Nanoparticle orientation to control RNA loading and ligand display on extracellular vesicles for cancer regression

  • Nature Nanotechnologyvolume 13pages8289 (2018)
  • doi:10.1038/s41565-017-0012-z
  • Download Citation


Nanotechnology offers many benefits, and here we report an advantage of applying RNA nanotechnology for directional control. The orientation of arrow-shaped RNA was altered to control ligand display on extracellular vesicle membranes for specific cell targeting, or to regulate intracellular trafficking of small interfering RNA (siRNA) or microRNA (miRNA). Placing membrane-anchoring cholesterol at the tail of the arrow results in display of RNA aptamer or folate on the outer surface of the extracellular vesicle. In contrast, placing the cholesterol at the arrowhead results in partial loading of RNA nanoparticles into the extracellular vesicles. Taking advantage of the RNA ligand for specific targeting and extracellular vesicles for efficient membrane fusion, the resulting ligand-displaying extracellular vesicles were capable of specific delivery of siRNA to cells, and efficiently blocked tumour growth in three cancer models. Extracellular vesicles displaying an aptamer that binds to prostate-specific membrane antigen, and loaded with survivin siRNA, inhibited prostate cancer xenograft. The same extracellular vesicle instead displaying epidermal growth-factor receptor aptamer inhibited orthotopic breast cancer models. Likewise, survivin siRNA-loaded and folate-displaying extracellular vesicles inhibited patient-derived colorectal cancer xenograft.

  • Subscribe to Nature Nanotechnology for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Shu, D., Shu, Y., Haque, F., Abdelmawla, S. & Guo, P. Thermodynamically stable RNA three-way junctions for constructing multifuntional nanoparticles for delivery of therapeutics. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 658–667 (2011).

  2. 2.

    Zhang, H. et al. Crystal structure of 3WJ core revealing divalent ion-promoted thermostability and assembly of the Phi29 hexameric motor pRNA. RNA 19, 1226–1237 (2013).

  3. 3.

    Guo, P., Erickson, S. & Anderson, D. A small viral RNA is required for in vitro packaging of bacteriophage phi29 DNA. Science 236, 690–694 (1987).

  4. 4.

    Guo, P., Zhang, C., Chen, C., Trottier, M. & Garver, K. Inter-RNA interaction of phage phi29 pRNA to form a hexameric complex for viral DNA transportation. Mol. Cell. 2, 149–155 (1998).

  5. 5.

    Lamichhane, T. N., Raiker, R. S. & Jay, S. M. Exogenous DNA loading into extracellular vesicles via electroporation is size-dependent and enables limited gene delivery. Mol. Pharm. 12, 3650–3657 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Rak, J. Organ-seeking vesicles. Nature 527, 312–314 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Melo, S. A. et al. Glypican-1 identifies cancer exosomes and detects early pancreatic cancer. Nature 523, 177–182 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Witwer, K. W. et al. Standardization of sample collection, isolation and analysis methods in extracellular vesicle research. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 2, (2013).

  9. 9.

    Shelke, G. V., Lasser, C., Gho, Y. S. & Lotvall, J. Importance of exosome depletion protocols to eliminate functional and RNA-containing extracellular vesicles from fetal bovine serum. J. Extracell. Vesicles. 3, (2014).

  10. 10.

    Thery, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G. & Clayton, A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 3, Unit 3.22 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Kumar, D., Gupta, D., Shankar, S. & Srivastava, R. K. Biomolecular characterization of exosomes released from cancer stem cells: possible implications for biomarker and treatment of cancer. Oncotarget 6, 3280–3291 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Bunge, A. et al. Lipid membranes carrying lipophilic cholesterol-based oligonucleotides: characterization and application on layer-by-layer coated particles. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 16425–16434 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Pfeiffer, I. & Hook, F. Bivalent cholesterol-based coupling of oligonucletides to lipid membrane assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10224–10225 (2004).

  14. 14.

    Marcus, M. & Leonard, J. N. FedExosomes: engineering therapeutic biological nanoparticles that truly deliver. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 6, 659–680 (2013).

  15. 15.

    van Dongen, H. M., Masoumi, N., Witwer, K. W. & Pegtel, D. M. Extracellular vesicles exploit viral entry routes for cargo delivery. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 369–386 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Parker, N. et al. Folate receptor expression in carcinomas and normal tissues determined by a quantitative radioligand binding assay. Anal. Biochem. 338, 284–293 (2005).

  17. 17.

    Dassie, J. P. et al. Targeted inhibition of prostate cancer metastases with an RNA aptamer to prostate-specific membrane antigen. Mol. Ther. 22, 1910–1922 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Rockey, W. M. et al. Rational truncation of an RNA aptamer to prostate-specific membrane antigen using computational structural modeling. Nucleic Acid Ther. 21, 299–314 (2011).

  19. 19.

    Binzel, D. et al. Specific delivery of MiRNA for high efficient inhibition of prostate cancer by RNA nanotechnology. Mol. Ther. 24, 1267–1277 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Hynes, N. E. & Lane, H. A. ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 341–354 (2005).

  21. 21.

    Esposito, C. L. et al. A neutralizing RNA aptamer against EGFR causes selective apoptotic cell death. PLoS One 6, e24071 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Shu, D. et al. Systemic delivery of anti-miRNA for suppression of triple negative breast cancer utilizing RNA nanotechnology. ACS Nano 9, 9731–9740 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Paduano, F. et al. Silencing of survivin gene by small interfering RNAs produces supra-additive growth suppression in combination with 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in human prostate cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 5, 179–186 (2006).

  24. 24.

    Khaled, A., Guo, S., Li, F. & Guo, P. Controllable self-assembly of nanoparticles for specific delivery of multiple therapeutic molecules to cancer cells using RNA nanotechnology. Nano Lett. 5, 1797–1808 (2005).

  25. 25.

    Cui, D. et al. Regression of gastric cancer by systemic injection of RNA nanoparticles carrying both ligand and siRNA. Sci. Rep. 5, 10726 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Lee, T. J. et al. RNA nanoparticles as a vector for targeted siRNA delivery into glioblastoma mouse model. Oncotarget 6, 14766–14776 (2015).

  27. 27.

    varez-Erviti, L. et al. Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 341–345 (2011).

  28. 28.

    Ohno, S. et al. Systemically injected exosomes targeted to EGFR deliver antitumor microRNA to breast cancer cells. Mol. Ther. 21, 185–191 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Tian, Y. et al. A doxorubicin delivery platform using engineered natural membrane vesicle exosomes for targeted tumor therapy. Biomaterials 35, 2383–2390 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Hung, M. E. & Leonard, J. N. Stabilization of exosome-targeting peptides via engineered glycosylation. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 8166–8172 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Binzel, D. W., Khisamutdinov, E. F. & Guo, P. Entropy-driven one-step formation of Phi29 pRNA 3WJ from three RNA fragments. Biochemistry 53, 2221–2231 (2014).

  32. 32.

    Haque, F. et al. Ultrastable synergistic tetravalent RNA nanoparticles for targeting to cancers. Nano Today 7, 245–257 (2012).

  33. 33.

    Li, Y., Tian, Z., Rizvi, S. M., Bander, N. H. & Allen, B. J. In vitro and preclinical targeted alpha therapy of human prostate cancer with Bi-213 labeled J591 antibody against the prostate specific membrane antigen. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 5, 36–46 (2002).

  34. 34.

    Pettaway, C. A. et al. Selection of highly metastatic variants of different human prostatic carcinomas using orthotopic implantation in nude mice. Clin. Cancer Res. 2, 1627–1636 (1996).

  35. 35.

    Rimawi, M. F. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer association with biologic phenotype and clinical outcomes. Cancer 116, 1234–1242 (2010).

  36. 36.

    Pecot, C., Calin, G. A., Coleman, R. L., Lopez-Berestein, G. & Sood, A. K. RNA interference in the clinic: challenges and future directions. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 59–67 (2011).

  37. 37.

    El Andaloussi, S., Mager, I., Breakefield, X. O. & Wood, M. J. Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12, 347–357 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Valadi, H. et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 654–659 (2007).

  39. 39.

    El Andaloussi, S., Lakhal, S., Mager, I. & Wood, M. J. Exosomes for targeted siRNA delivery across biological barriers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 391–397 (2013).

  40. 40.

    van Dommelen, S. M. et al. Microvesicles and exosomes: opportunities for cell-derived membrane vesicles in drug delivery. J. Control Release 161, 635–644 (2012).

  41. 41.

    Wiklander, O. P. et al. Extracellular vesicle in vivo biodistribution is determined by cell source, route of administration and targeting. J. Extracell. Vesicles 4, 26316 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Guo, P. The emerging field of RNA nanotechnology. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 833–842 (2010).

  43. 43.

    Shu, D., Khisamutdinov, E., Zhang, L. & Guo, P. Programmable folding of fusion RNA complex driven by the 3WJ motif of phi29 motor pRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e10 (2013).

  44. 44.

    Varkouhi, A. K., Scholte, M., Storm, G. & Haisma, H. J. Endosomal escape pathways for delivery of biologicals. J. Control Release 151, 220–228 (2011).

  45. 45.

    Kilchrist, K. V., Evans, B. C., Brophy, C. M. & Duvall, C. L. Mechanism of enhanced cellular uptake and cytosolic retention of MK2 inhibitory peptide nano-polyplexes. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 9, 368–381 (2016).

  46. 46.

    Jasinski, D., Schwartz, C., Haque, F. & Guo, P. Large scale purification of RNA nanoparticles by preparative ultracentrifugation. Methods Mol. Biol. 1297, 67–82 (2015).

Download references


We thank H. G. Zhang for his communication during the investigation of the exosome project, and J. Zhang, H. Weiss, D. Wu and D. Gao for assistance with statistical analysis. The research was supported mainly by National Institutes of Health grants UH3TR000875 and U01CA207946 (P. G.), and partially by R01CA186100 (B. G.), R35CA197706 (C.M.C.), P30CA177558 and R01CA195573 (B.M.E.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Tae Jin Lee

    Present address: Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA


  1. College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    • Fengmei Pi
    • , Daniel W. Binzel
    • , Zhefeng Li
    • , Hui Li
    • , Farzin Haque
    • , Shaoying Wang
    •  & Peixuan Guo
  2. Center for RNA Nanobiotechnology and Nanomedicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    • Fengmei Pi
    • , Daniel W. Binzel
    • , Zhefeng Li
    • , Hui Li
    • , Farzin Haque
    • , Shaoying Wang
    •  & Peixuan Guo
  3. Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    • Fengmei Pi
    • , Daniel W. Binzel
    • , Tae Jin Lee
    • , Zhefeng Li
    • , Hui Li
    • , Farzin Haque
    • , Shaoying Wang
    • , Carlo M. Croce
    •  & Peixuan Guo
  4. Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    • Fengmei Pi
    • , Daniel W. Binzel
    • , Zhefeng Li
    • , Hui Li
    • , Farzin Haque
    • , Shaoying Wang
    •  & Peixuan Guo
  5. Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    • Tae Jin Lee
    • , Carlo M. Croce
    •  & Peixuan Guo
  6. Department of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    • Meiyan Sun
    •  & Bin Guo
  7. Markey Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    • Piotr Rychahou
    •  & B. Mark Evers


  1. Search for Fengmei Pi in:

  2. Search for Daniel W. Binzel in:

  3. Search for Tae Jin Lee in:

  4. Search for Zhefeng Li in:

  5. Search for Meiyan Sun in:

  6. Search for Piotr Rychahou in:

  7. Search for Hui Li in:

  8. Search for Farzin Haque in:

  9. Search for Shaoying Wang in:

  10. Search for Carlo M. Croce in:

  11. Search for Bin Guo in:

  12. Search for B. Mark Evers in:

  13. Search for Peixuan Guo in:


P.G. generated the original idea of using the 3WJ structure orientation to control cell entry or cell surface anchoring, respectively, and designed the arrowhead and arrowtail technology. P.G. and F.P. conceived and designed the experiments. H.L. and S.W. developed the method for RNA insertion to EV. F.P., H.L., D.W.B. and Z.L. performed the experiments. M.S. and B. Guo performed the prostate cancer mouse studies. T.J.L. performed the breast cancer mouse studies. P.R. performed the colorectal cancer mouse studies. P.G. and F.H. supervised the project. P.G., C.M.C. and B.M.E. provided the funding and resources. P.G., F.P., F.H. and D.W.B. co-wrote the manuscript, and all authors refined the manuscript.

Competing interests

P.G.’s Sylvan G. Frank Endowed Chair position in Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery is funded by the CM Chen Foundation, and he is a consultant of Oxford Nanopore, Nanobio Delivery Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and the cofounder of P&Z Biological Technology LLC. F.P. now works for Nanobio Delivery Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. S.W. and F.H. now work for P&Z Biological Technology LLC.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peixuan Guo.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Information

    Supplementary figures and figure legends.

  2. Life Sciences Reporting Summary