Consistent failure over the past few decades to reduce the high prevalence of stress-related disorders has motivated a search for alternative research strategies. Resilience refers to the phenomenon of many people maintaining mental health despite exposure to psychological or physical adversity. Instead of aiming to understand the pathophysiology of stress-related disorders, resilience research focuses on protective mechanisms that shield people against the development of such disorders and tries to exploit its insights to improve treatment and, in particular, disease prevention. To fully harness the potential of resilience research, a critical appraisal of the current state of the art — in terms of basic concepts and key methods — is needed. We highlight challenges to resilience research and make concrete conceptual and methodological proposals to improve resilience research. Most importantly, we propose to focus research on the dynamic processes of successful adaptation to stressors in prospective longitudinal studies.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Vos, T. et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 386, 743–800 (2015).
Olesen, J. et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur. J. Neurol. 19, 155–162 (2012).
Jorm, A. F., Patten, S. B., Brugha, T. S. & Mojtabai, R. Has increased provision of treatment reduced the prevalence of common mental disorders? Review of the evidence from four countries. World Psychiatry 16b, 90–99 (2017).
Bonanno, G. A., Westphal, M. & Mancini, A. D. Resilience to loss and potential trauma. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 7, 511–535 (2011).
Boden, J. M. & McLeod, G. F. H. Resilience and psychiatric epidemiology: implications for a conceptual framework. Behav. Brain Sci. 38, e95 (2015).
Chang, L. J., Reddan, M., Ashar, Y. K., Eisenbarth, H. & Wager, T. D. The challenges of forecasting resilience. Behav. Brain Sci. 38, e98 (2015).
Sapienza, J. K. & Masten, A. S. Understanding and promoting resilience in children and youth. Curr. Opin. Psychiat. 24, 267–273 (2011).
Bonanno, G. A., Romero, S. A. & Klein, S. I. The temporal elements of psychological resilience: an integrative framework for the study of individuals, families, and communities. Psychol. Inq. 26, 139–169 (2015).
Kalisch, R., Müller, M. B. & Tüscher, O. A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience. Behav. Brain Sci. 38, e92 (2015).
Kalisch, R., Müller, M. B. & Tüscher, O. Advancing empirical resilience research. Behav. Brain Sci. 38, e128 (2015).
Tugade, M. M. & Fredrickson, B. L. Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86, 320–333 (2004).
Kaplan, C. P., Turner, S., Norman, E. & Stillson, K. Promoting resilience strategies: a modified consultation model. Child. Sch. 18, 158–168 (1996).
Saleebey, D. The strengths perspective in social work practice: extensions and cautions. Soc. Work 41, 296–305 (1996).
Schultze-Lutter, F., Schimmelmann, B. G. & Schmidt, S. J. Resilience, risk, mental health and well-being: associations and conceptual differences. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 25, 459–466 (2016).
Pęciłło, M. The concept of resilience in OSH management: a review of approaches. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 22, 291–300 (2016).
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D. & Becker, B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev. 71, 543–562 (2000).
Tedeschi, R. G. & Calhoun, L. G. Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol. Inq. 15, 1–18 (2004).
Joseph, S. & Linley, P. A. Growth following adversity: theoretical perspectives and implications for clinical practice. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 26,1041–1053 (2006).
Johnson, S. F. & Boals, A. Refining our ability to measure posttraumatic growth. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 7, 422–429 (2015).
Seery, M. D., Holman, E. A. & Silver, R. C. Whatever does not kill us: cumulative lifetime adversity, vulnerability, and resilience. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99, 1025–1041 (2010).
Seery, M. D., Leo, R. J., Lupien, S. P., Kondrak, C. L. & Almonte, J. L. An upside to adversity? Moderate cumulative lifetime adversity is associated with resilient responses in the face of controlled stressors. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1181–1189 (2013).
Boks, M. P. et al. Longitudinal changes of telomere length and epigenetic age related to traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 51, 506–512 (2015).
Breen, M. S. et al. Gene networks specific for innate immunity define post-traumatic stress disorder. Mol. Psychiatry 20, 1538–1545 (2015).
Krishnan, V. et al. Molecular adaptations underlying susceptibility and resistance to social defeat in brain reward regions. Cell 131, 391–404 (2007).
Friedman, A. K. et al. Enhancing depression mechanisms in midbrain dopamine neurons achieves homeostatic resilience. Science 344,313–319 (2014).
Wang, M., Perova, Z., Arenkiel, B. R. & Li, B. Synaptic modifications in the medial prefrontal cortex in susceptibility and resilience to stress. J. Neurosci. 34b, 7485–7492 (2014).
Maier, S. F. Behavioral control blunts reactions to contemporaneous and future adverse events: medial prefrontal cortex plasticity and a corticostriatal network. Neurobiol. Stress 1, 12–22 (2015).
Russo, S. J., Murrough, J. W., Han, M.-H., Charney, D. S. & Nestler, E. J. Neurobiology of resilience. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1475–1484 (2012).
Bonanno, G. A. loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am. Psychol. 59, 20–28 (2004).
Windle, G., Bennett, K. M. & Noyes, J. A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 9, 8 (2011).
Kline, A. et al. Gender differences in the risk and protective factors associated with PTSD: a prospective study of National Guard troops deployed to Iraq. Psychiatry 76, 256–272 (2013).
McAndrew, L. M. et al. Resilience during war: better unit cohesion and reductions in avoidant coping are associated with better mental health function after combat deployment. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 9, 52–61 (2017).
Clark, R. et al. Predicting post-traumatic stress disorder in veterans: interaction of traumatic load with COMT gene variation. J. Psychiatr. Res. 47, 1849–1856 (2013).
Eraly, S. A. et al. Assessment of plasma C-reactive protein as a biomarker of posttraumatic stress disorder risk. JAMA Psychiatry 71, 423–431 (2014).
Gupta, S. & Bonanno, G. A. Trait self-enhancement as a buffer against potentially traumatic events: a prospective study. Psychol. Trauma 2, 83–92 (2010).
Jenness, J. L. et al. Catastrophizing, rumination, and reappraisal prospectively predict adolescent PTSD symptom onset following a terrorist attack. Depress. Anxiety 33, 1039–1047 (2016).
Morin, R. T., Galatzer-Levy, I. R., Maccallum, F. & Bonanno, G. A. Do multiple health events reduce resilience when compared with single events? Health Psychol. (in the press).
Smid, G. E. et al. Cytokine production as a putative biological mechanism underlying stress sensitization in high combat exposed soldiers. Psychoneuroendocrinology 51, 534–546 (2015).
Steudte-Schmiedgen, S. et al. Hair cortisol concentrations and cortisol stress reactivity predict PTSD symptom increase after trauma exposure during military deployment. Psychoneuroendocrinology 59, 123–133 (2015).
van Zuiden, M. et al. Pre-existing high glucocorticoid receptor number predicting development of posttraumatic stress symptoms after military deployment. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 89–96 (2011).
Wald, I. et al. Attention to threats and combat-related posttraumatic stress symptoms: prospective associations and moderation by the serotonin transporter gene. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 401–408 (2013).
Zhu, Z., Galatzer-Levy, I. R. & Bonanno, G. A. Heterogeneous depression responses to chronic pain onset among middle-aged adults: a prospective study. Psychiatry Res. 217, 60–66 (2014).
The following colleagues were helpful in proof-reading and approving the submitted manuscript: D. Hermans, F. Raes and J. Vlaeyen (all University of Leuven, Belgium), B. Berninger, H. Luhmann, R. Nitsch, K. Radyushkin, S. Ryu, M. Schreckenberger, S. Schweiger, A. Stroh, U. Zechner (all at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), A. Acker-Palmer, S. Duvarci, J. Roeper, T. Sigurdsson (all at Goethe University), J. Letzkus, E. Schuman (both at Max Planck Institute for Brain Research) and V. Tiwari (Institute for Molecular Biology). In preparing this Perspective, U.B. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG CRC 1193, subproject C06); G.A.B. by the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (project 2013067), David and Maureen O’Connor, and the Rockefeller Foundation (2012-RLC 304); A.C. by DFG CRC 1193, subproject C04; E.B. by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme (EU H2020/705217); C.J.F. by DFG CRC 1193, subprojects C03 and C06, DFG FI 848/5-1, and the European Research Council (ERC-CoG 617891); I.G.-L. by the National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH102415); S.G. by DFG CRC 1193, subproject B05; E.J.H. by the ERC (ERC-CoG682591); R.K. by DFG CRC 1193, subprojects B01 and C01, and the State of Rhineland-Palatinate (project 1080, MARP); K.L. by DFG CRC 1193, subproject Z03, and the State of Rhineland-Palatinate (project 1080, MARP); B.L. by DFG CRC 1193, subprojects A02, B03, and Z02; M.B.M. by DFG CRC 1193, subprojects A03 and Z02; R.J.M. by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF 100014-143398; project no. un 8306); A.R. by DFG CRC 1193, subprojects C07 and Z03, and EU H2020/2014-2020 (643051 (MiND) and 667302 (CoCA)); K.R. by the ERC (ERC_StG2012_313749) and the NWO (NWO VICI no. 453-12-001); B.P.F.R. by the NWO (NWO VENI no. 916-11-086); D.S. by the SNF (SNF 100014-143398, project no. un 8306); O.T. by DFG CRC 1193, subproject C04, and the State of Rhineland-Palatinate (project 1080, MARP); A.-L.v.H. by the Royal Society (DH150176); C.H.V. by the Netherlands Brain Foundation (Fellowship F2013(1)-216) and the NWO (NWO VENI no. 451-13-001); T.D.W. by the National Institute of Health (NIH); M.We. by DFG CRC 1193, subprojects C05 and C07; and M.Wi. by DFG CRC 1193, subproject C04. The authors thank A. Kline and J. L. Jenness for providing unpublished results.
All authors report to have no financial and non-financial actual or perceived competing interests. A.R. has received a research grant from Medice and speakers honoraria from neuraxpharm and Boehringer. H.W. has received a speaker’s honorarium from Servier. All other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kalisch, R., Baker, D.G., Basten, U. et al. The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders. Nat Hum Behav 1, 784–790 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0200-8
Journal of Affective Disorders (2021)
Frontiers in Psychiatry (2021)
Psychiatry Research (2021)
BMJ Open (2021)
Investigation of the mental health status of frontier-line and non-frontier-line medical staff during a stress period
Journal of Affective Disorders (2021)