Trapping lead in perovskite solar modules with abundant and low-cost cation-exchange resins

Abstract

One major concern for the commercialization of perovskite photovoltaic technology is the toxicity of lead from the water-soluble lead halide perovskites that can contaminate the environment. Here, we report an abundant, low-cost and chemically robust cation-exchange resin (CER)-based method that can prevent lead leakage from damaged perovskite solar modules under severe weather conditions. CERs exhibit both high adsorption capacity and high adsorption rate of lead in water due to the high binding energy with lead ions in the mesoporous structure. Integrating CERs with carbon electrodes and layering them on the glass surface of modules has a negligible detrimental effect on device efficiency while reducing lead leakage from perovskite mini-modules by 62-fold to 14.3 ppb in water. The simulated lead leakage from damaged large-area perovskite solar panels treated with CERs can be further reduced to below 7.0 ppb even in the worst-case scenario that every sub-module is damaged.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Lead adsorption properties of CERs.
Fig. 2: Characterization of CERs on PSCs.
Fig. 3: Lead sequestration in perovskite solar mini-modules with CER coating layers.
Fig. 4: Lead sequestration in PSCs with CER-incorporated carbon electrodes.
Fig. 5: Lead leakage simulation on a damaged carbon perovskite solar panel.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the published article and its Supplementary Information and Source Data files. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. 1.

    NREL, Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed February 2020).

  2. 2.

    Deng, Y. et al. Tailoring solvent coordination for high-speed, room-temperature blading of perovskite photovoltaic films. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax7537 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Extance, A. The reality behind solar power’s next star material. Nature 570, 429–432 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cheacharoen, R. et al. Encapsulating perovskite solar cells to withstand damp heat and thermal cycling. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2, 2398–2406 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rong, Y. et al. Challenges for commercializing perovskite solar cells. Science 361, eaat8235 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rajagopal, A., Yao, K. & Jen, A. K.-Y. Toward perovskite solar cell commercialization: a perspective and research roadmap based on interfacial engineering. Adv. Mater. 30, 1800455 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ke, W. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Prospects for low-toxicity lead-free perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 965 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kamat, P. V., Bisquert, J. & Buriak, J. Lead-free perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 904–905 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yang, S. et al. Stabilizing halide perovskite surfaces for solar cell operation with wide-bandgap lead oxysalts. Science 365, 473–478 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bai, S. et al. Planar perovskite solar cells with long-term stability using ionic liquid additives. Nature 571, 245–250 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jiang, Y. et al. Reduction of lead leakage from damaged lead halide perovskite solar modules using self-healing polymer-based encapsulation. Nat. Energy 4, 585–593 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lee, J., Kim, G. W., Kim, M., Park, S. A. & Park, T. Nonaromatic green-solvent-processable, dopant-free, and lead-capturable hole transport polymers in perovskite solar cells with high efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1902662 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li, X. et al. On-device lead sequestration for perovskite solar cells. Nature 578, 555–558 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Da̧browski, A., Hubicki, Z., Podkościelny, P. & Robens, E. Selective removal of the heavy metal ions from waters and industrial wastewaters by ion-exchange method. Chemosphere 56, 91–106 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Alexandratos, S. D. Ion-exchange resins: a retrospective from industrial and engineering chemistry research. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 388–398 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sulaeman, A., Driejana, D. & Hasan, N. Y. Composition of ions and trace metals in rainwater in Bandung city, Indonesia. IPTEK J. Proc. Ser. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2017i6.3310 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Ropo, M., Schneider, M., Baldauf, C. & Blum, V. First-principles data set of 45,892 isolated and cation-coordinated conformers of 20 proteinogenic amino acids. Sci. Data 3, 160009 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ropo, M., Blum, V. & Baldauf, C. Trends for isolated amino acids and dipeptides: conformation, divalent ion binding, and remarkable similarity of binding to calcium and lead. Sci. Rep. 6, 35772 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Florea, A.-M. et al. Lead (Pb2+) neurotoxicity: ion-mimicry with calcium (Ca2+) impairs synaptic transmission. A review with animated illustrations of the pre- and post-synaptic effects of lead. J. Local Glob. Health Sci. https://doi.org/10.5339/jlghs.2013.4 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Burgess, J. Metal Ions in Solution (Horwood, Chichester, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Razzaq, R., Shah, K. H., Fahad, M., Naeem, A. & Sherazi, T. A. Adsorption potential of macroporous Amberlyst-15 for Cd(II) removal from aqueous solutions. Mater. Res. Express 7, 025509 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Determining Resistance of Photovoltaic Modules to Hail by Impact With Propelled Ice Balls ASTM E1038-10, (ASTM International, 2019); https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1038.htm

  23. 23.

    Fagiolari, L. & Bella, F. Carbon-based materials for stable, cheaper and large-scale processable perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 3437–3472 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Meng, F. N. et al. Current progress in interfacial engineering of carbon-based perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 8690–8699 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mei, A. et al. A hole-conductor-free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability. Science 345, 295–298 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Han, Y. et al. Degradation observations of encapsulated planar CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells at high temperatures and humidity. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 8139–8147 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kato, Y. et al. Silver iodide formation in methyl ammonium lead iodide perovskite solar cells with silver top electrodes. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2, 1500195 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Guerrero, A. et al. Interfacial degradation of planar lead halide perovskite solar cells. ACS Nano 10, 218–224 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sanehira, E. M. et al. Influence of electrode interfaces on the stability of perovskite solar cells: reduced degradation using MoOx/Al for hole collection. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 38–45 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Grancini, G. et al. One-year stable perovskite solar cells by 2D/3D interface engineering. Nat. Commun. 8, 15684 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chu, Q.-Q. et al. Highly stable carbon-based perovskite solar cell with a record efficiency of over 18% via hole transport engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 35, 987–993 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wu, X. et al. Efficient and stable carbon-based perovskite solar cells enabled by the inorganic interface of CuSCN and carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 12236–12243 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Arora, N. et al. Low-cost and highly efficient carbon-based perovskite solar cells exhibiting excellent long-term operational and UV stability. Small 15, 1904746 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Newbury, D.E. Mistakes encountered during automatic peak identification in low beam energy X-ray microanalysis. Scanning 29, 137–151 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lagergren, S. About the theory of so-called adsorption of soluble substances. Kungl. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl. 24, 1–39 (1898).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Fairley, N. CasaXPS: processing software for XPS, AES, SIMS and more. v. 2, 15, (2016).

  37. 37.

    Blum, V. et al. Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2175–2196 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ambrosetti, A., Reilly, A. M., DiStasio, R. A. Jr. & Tkatchenko, A. Long-range correlation energy calculated from coupled atomic response functions. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 18A508 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rossi, M., Chutia, S., Scheffler, M. & Blum, V. Validation challenge of density-functional theory for peptides—example of Ac-Phe-Ala5-LysH+. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 7349–7359 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Schubert, F. et al. Exploring the conformational preferences of 20-residue peptides in isolation: Ac-Ala19-Lys + H+ vs. Ac-Lys-Ala19 + H+ and the current reach of DFT. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 7373–7385 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported mainly by the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. We acknowledge support for the first-principles computations by the Center for Hybrid Organic Inorganic Semiconductors for Energy (CHOISE), an Energy Frontier Research Center (EFRC) funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science. We used the BET surface area and pore diameter analyser (Quantachrome NOVA 2000e) at the AMPED EFRC Instrumentation Facility established by the Alliance for Molecular PhotoElectrode Design for Solar Fuels, an EFRC funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, under award number DE-SC0001011).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.H. and S.C. conceived the idea. S.C. fabricated the metal electrode PSCs and carbon perovskite solar devices, and conducted the lead leakage tests. Y.D. fabricated the metal electrode perovskite solar modules. H.G. prepared the carbon paste. S.X. simulated the lead leakage from solar panels. S.W. analysed the XPS results. Z.Y. assisted the fabrication of carbon PSCs. V.B. performed the computation of adsorption energies. J.H. and S.C. wrote the paper. All authors reviewed the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinsong Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–18 and Tables 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical Source Data

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical Source Data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Deng, Y., Gu, H. et al. Trapping lead in perovskite solar modules with abundant and low-cost cation-exchange resins. Nat Energy 5, 1003–1011 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00716-2

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing