Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Recycling lead and transparent conductors from perovskite solar modules

Abstract

Perovskite photovoltaics are gaining increasing common ground to partner with or compete with silicon photovoltaics to reduce cost of solar energy. However, a cost-effective waste management for toxic lead (Pb), which might determine the fate of this technology, has not been developed yet. Here, we report an end-of-life material management for perovskite solar modules to recycle toxic lead and valuable transparent conductors to protect the environment and create dramatic economic benefits from recycled materials. Lead is separated from decommissioned modules by weakly acidic cation exchange resin, which could be released as soluble Pb(NO3)2 followed by precipitation as PbI2 for reuse, with a recycling efficiency of 99.2%. Thermal delamination disassembles the encapsulated modules with intact transparent conductors and cover glasses. The refabricated devices based on recycled lead iodide and recycled transparent conductors show comparable performance as devices based on fresh raw materials. Cost analysis shows this recycling technology is economically attractive.

Introduction

Perovskite photovoltaic (PV) technologies are revolutionizing electricity generation by using a new generation of metal halide perovskites (MHPs)1,2. The best perovskite solar-cell efficiency already reached 25.5%, comparable to the best PV cells made of single-crystal silicon, and the perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells already achieved a high certified efficiency of 29.5%3. The defect-tolerant metal halide perovskites could be manufactured by low-cost solution processes, such as blade coating, slot-die coating, and spray coating, which offer small capital expense4,5,6,7,8. The efficiencies of perovskite minimodules fabricated by scalable deposition methods are also approaching 20%9. There are more than a dozen companies world-widely commercializing the perovskite PV either by combining with existing PV technology using tandem structures, or standalone using single-junction structure10.

In this study, we proposed a low-cost recycling technique for perovskite solar modules using carboxylic acid cation-exchange resin as lead adsorbent and using thermal delamination to expose perovskite films. The carboxylic acid cation-exchange resin could efficiently adsorb lead ions from organic solvents and efficiently release the adsorbed lead ions to clean solution by ion-exchange process between Pb2+ ions and H+ ions. Different from previous lead-trapping studies via strongly acidic cation-exchange resin21,22, the weakly acidic cation-exchange resin showed better lead recycling efficiency due to easy release of Pb2+ ions from carboxylic acid functional group compared with sulfonic acid. The lead was precipitated from aqueous solution as recrystallized PbI2 for reusing after reaction with sodium iodide. We also developed a thermal delamination method to disassemble the encapsulated perovskite solar module with intact glass substrates, which recycled both front transparent conductor and back cover glass with high reuse value. Finally, the recycling cost was estimated to evaluate the economic incentives of this recycling technique.

Results

$$2{{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}-{{{{{\rm{COOH}}}}}}+{{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}}^{2+}\leftrightarrow {\left({{{{{\rm{R}}}}}}-{{{{{\rm{COO}}}}}}\right)}_{2}{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}+{2{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{+}$$
(1)

It is noted that the ion-exchange process is a reversible reaction. A high concentration of H+ ions in solution could reverse the equilibrium in equation (1), which is a resin-regeneration process and thus can be used for lead release. Typical regenerant for cation-exchange resins is high-concentration HCl or H2SO4 acid solution. Considering PbCl2 and PbSO4 have low solubility in aqueous solution, regeneration by HCl and H2SO4 could directly precipitate the released Pb2+ ions as PbCl2 and PbSO4, respectively, which cause difficulty to separate lead with resin. Here, we chose HNO3 aqueous solution as regenerant to release the adsorbed lead ions as water-soluble Pb(NO3)2. Because PbI2 is the main lead source for most of highly efficient perovskite solar cells, the best form of recycled lead for reusing is PbI2 Therefore, the lead is converted from Pb(NO3)2 to PbI2 precipitation by adding low-cost NaI due to their solubility difference in aqueous solution.

Module delamination

To recycle the end-of-life perovskite solar modules, the first step is to develop a delamination technique to disassemble the encapsulated modules in order to expose the perovskite layer. Here we consider the perovskite module structure fabricated on indium tin oxide (ITO) glass and encapsulated with another piece of glass and encapsulant. The existing encapsulants for perovskite solar cells include epoxy resin, polyolefin, Surlyn, polyisobutylene, polyurethane, etc., together with a back cover glass which can effectively prevent the permeation of moisture, oxygen, and other hazards38,39,40,41. This is the most likely structure in commercial perovskite solar modules that gives best stability, and was thus chosen for this study. We discovered that a short thermal treatment at high temperature can effectively disassemble the encapsulated perovskite solar modules and obtain both intact ITO glass and back cover glass. After thermal stress at 250 °C for 2 min, the polymer encapsulant was melt, which created a strain to delaminate the perovskite solar module at the interface of electron-transport layer (ETL) and metal electrode, such as epoxy resin as encapsulant in Fig. 2. The lead halide perovskite films and ETL stayed at the ITO/glass side, then ETL was washed by 1,2-dichlorobenzene (DCB), and lead halide perovskite was dissolved in DMF for subsequent lead recycling (Fig. 2b). After washing away the hole-transport layer and other residuals, ITO/glass could reuse for module refabrication. We found no noticeable conductivity changes for the ITO/glass substrate after recycling process. Even after annealing at 250 °C for 1 h, the conductivity of ITO/glass only slightly increased from 14.6 Ω/sq to 15.2 Ω/sq (Fig. 2c). The Cr and Cu electrodes with the encapsulant stayed at back cover-glass side, where 30 nm of Cr layer on the top surface induced a black color and electrode/encapsulant film formed winkles after thermal stress (Fig. 2b). The encapsulant and metal electrode were scraped by a knife when the encapsulant was still soft, and then the back cover glass was cleaned for reuse.

Cation-exchange resins for lead recycling

The large total capacity of WAC resin and its high affinity for hydrogen ions are crucial to achieve both high lead-removal ratio during adsorption process and high lead-release ratio during regeneration process. The ion exchange between H+ and Pb2+ undergoing reversible reaction as shown in equation (1) and the equilibrium constant $${K}_{{\rm {H}}^{+}}^{{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}}$$can be defined as:

$${K}_{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}^{+}}^{{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}}=\frac{{\left[{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}\right]}_{r}\times {\left[{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{s}^{2}}{{\left[{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}\right]}_{s}\times {\left[{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{r}^{2}}$$
(2)

where $${\left[{{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}}^{2+}\right]}_{{{{{{\rm{r}}}}}}}$$ and $${\left[{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{{{{{{\rm{r}}}}}}}$$ is the concentration of Pb2+ and H+ ions on resin, respectively, and $${\left[{{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}}^{2+}\right]}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}$$ and $${\left[{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}$$ is the concentration of Pb2+ and H+ ions in solution, respectively. The ratio of Pb2+ concentration on resin and Pb2+ concentration in solution is characterized with a distribution coefficient D:

$$D=\frac{{\left[{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}\right]}_{r}}{{\left[{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}\right]}_{s}}={K}_{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}^{+}}^{{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}}\times \frac{{\left[{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{r}^{2}}{{\left[{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{s}^{2}}$$
(3)

A large D value is needed for lead-adsorption process and a small D value is preferred during regeneration process, where the concentration difference of H+ on resin and in solution is also important besides $${K}_{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}^{+}}^{{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}}$$ value. In lead-adsorption process, the large difference of H+ ion concentration on resin $${\left[{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{{{{{{\rm{r}}}}}}}$$ and in solution $${\left[{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{{{{{{\rm{r}}}}}}}$$ generates a large D value for efficient adsorption of Pb2+ ions. The WAC-gel and WAC-MP resin in this study has a high total capacity (total active H+ sites on resin) of 4 eq/L (equivalents per liter of resin), which is larger than the total capacity of 1.9 eq/L for SAC-gel resin and 1.7 eq/L for SAC-MP resin. This large $${\left[{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{{{{{{\rm{r}}}}}}}$$ on WAC resin explains its excellent lead-adsorption performance. During the resin-regeneration process, the high H+ ion concentration in HNO3 solution $${\left[{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}}^{+}\right]}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}$$ decreases the D value, thus releasing Pb2+ ions. The major difference between the WAC resin and SAC resin is their affinity of Pb2+ ions compared with H+ ions. Due to different acid-dissociation constant, the $${K}_{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}^{+}}^{{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}}$$ for WAC resin based on carboxylic acid functional group is smaller than 1, while the $${K}_{{{{{{\rm{H}}}}}}^{+}}^{{{{{{\rm{Pb}}}}}}^{2+}}$$ for SAC resin based on sulfonic acid functional group is larger than 142. As a result, WAC resin can be regenerated to its full capacity with near 100% lead desorption by using a low concentration of HNO3 solution. However, the SAC resin is difficult to fully release the adsorbed Pb2+ ions even under high concentration of HNO3 solution. We thus chose the WAC resin for the lead recycling.

To better understand the lead-adsorption process on WAC-gel resin, the adsorption kinetics is characterized in Fig. 3c. During the rate-limiting step, if the adsorbed ion interacts with single unoccupied site on the adsorbent, the curve can be fitted with the pseudo-first-order kinetic model43,44:

$$\frac{d{q}_{t}}{dt}={k}_{1}\cdot ({q}_{e}-{q}_{t})$$
(4)
$$\log ({q}_{e}-{q}_{t})=\,\log ({q}_{e})-\left (\frac{{k}_{1}}{2.303}\right )t$$
(5)

where qe and qt the amount adsorbed at equilibrium and at time t, respectively (mg/g), and k1 is the rate constant (min−1). A pseudo-second-order kinetic model is based on sorption equilibrium that the adsorbed ion interacts with pairs of independent unoccupied sites on adsorbent during the rate-limiting step, and the kinetic rate is43,44:

$$\frac{d{q}_{t}}{dt}={k}_{2}\cdot {({q}_{e}-{q}_{t})}^{2}$$
(6)
$$\frac{t}{{q}_{t}}=\frac{1}{{k}_{2}{q}_{e}^{2}}+\frac{1}{{q}_{e}}t$$
(7)

where k2 is the rate constant (min−1). Figure 3d and Supplementary Fig. 1 show that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model is more matched than pseudo-first-order kinetic model for lead adsorption by WAC-gel resin. This indicates that the chemical adsorption of Pb2+ ions involves ion exchanges with two H+ sites on WAC-gel resin during the rate-limiting step.

In order to better characterize the adsorption performance, we analyzed the adsorption-operating capacity of WAC-gel resin under different Pb2+ ion concentrations. Different initial concentration of PbI2 solutions was prepared by dissolving 2 mmol of PbI2 powder in different amount of DMF solvent, then 1 g of WAC-gel resin was added into those PbI2 solutions under 400-rpm stir at room temperature for three days. Figure 3e shows the measured relation of adsorbed lead amount on WAC-gel resin and equilibrium Pb2+ ion concentration in solution. For 1 g of WAC-gel resin, it could adsorb more than 100 mg and around 150 mg of lead when the equilibrium Pb2+ concentration in solution is larger than 200 ppm and 6000 ppm, respectively.

Lead conversion from Pb(NO3)2 to PbI2

NaI solution was added into Pb(NO3)2 containing solution to convert the soluble Pb(NO3)2 to insoluble PbI2 as precipitation. Low solubility of PbI2 in aqueous solution, especially solution with additional I- ions, is the key for high conversion ratio of lead from Pb(NO3)2 to PbI2. Supplementary Fig. 2 shows the measured lead concentration of PbI2 in water as a function of added iodide concentration. The Pb2+ ion concentration in saturated PbI2 water solution is 261.7 ppm. With the addition of NaI, the concentration of I- ions in solution is increased, as a result, the concentration of Pb2+ ions in solution is decreased in order to maintain the solubility-product constant of Ksp = [Pb2+][I]2. However, when the concentration of I ions is too high, it facilitates the formation of other types of soluble lead, such as $${{{{{{\rm{PbI}}}}}}}_{3}^{-}$$ and $${{{{{{\rm{PbI}}}}}}}_{4}^{2-}$$ (Supplementary Fig. 2b). For 0.04 M Pb(NO3)2 solution, Fig. 3g shows that after mixing the Pb(NO3)2 solution with 1.5 M NaI solution at volume ratio between 14:1 and 1:1 could convert more than 99.6% of Pb(NO3)2 to PbI2, and a volume ratio of 5:1 results in a reduced lead concentration to ~1 ppm, which corresponds to a theoretical maximum PbI2 precipitation yield of 99.98%. The yield of PbI2 precipitation from Pb(NO3)2 solution is calculated by the amount of Pb2+ ions in solution before and after adding NaI solution. Considering the lead-adsorption ratio of 99.6% and lead-release ratio of 99.7%, the overall lead-recycling ratio was 99.2% after lead adsorption, lead release, and lead conversion processes (Fig. 3h).

Recycled materials’ properties

The lead-recycling performance of carboxylic acid cation-exchange resin for mixed-cation solution was investigated. It is important to selectively recycle PbI2 from the perovskite solution with mixed cations. We compared the lead adsorption speeds for PbI2 solution and mixed cation Cs0.1FA0.9PbI3 perovskite solution by WAC-gel in Fig. 4a, and they showed similar speed. This indicated that the Cs+ ions and FA+ ions did not reduce the lead-adsorption rate, which was attributed to the stronger bonding of Pb2+ ion to cation-exchange resin than other cations in perovskite solution. For 10 delaminated perovskite solar modules with composition of Cs0.1FA0.9PbI3 directly dissolved in 20 mL of DMF, the initial lead concentration was 1955 ppm, and it dropped to 0.5 ppm with a lead-adsorption ratio of 99.97% after three WAC-gel treatments. For mixed-cation Cs0.1FA0.9PbI3 perovskite solution, after ion exchanges for adsorption and desorption and subsequently reaction with NaI solution, the precipitation was pure PbI2 without CsI or FAI, as confirmed by XRD patterns (Fig. 4c). This is because CsI and FAI have large solubility in aqueous solution and do not form precipitation, even if Cs+ ions and FA+ ions were adsorbed and released by cation-exchange resins.

We compared the purity of recycled PbI2 powder with commercial PbI2 powders—99.99% purity from TCI and 99% purity from Sigma-Aldrich. For the recovered lead from perovskite photovoltaics in the format of PbI2, we denote it as recycled PbI2. For 184 mg of different types of PbI2 powder dissolved in 2 mL of DMF solvent, Fig. 4d and e shows that recycled PbI2 had 99.9% of relative lead concentration and 100% of relative iodine concentration compared with commercial 99.99% PbI2, and it had better purity than the commercial 99% PbI2. The ratios of Cs and Na to Pb for recycled PbI2 dissolved in DMF are both less than 0.1% (Fig. 4f). For the Cs0.1FA0.9PbI3 perovskite solar cells based on different type of PbI2, the median PCE was 21.0%, 20.4%, and 19.4% for 99.99% PbI2, recycled PbI2, and 99% PbI2, respectively (Fig. 4g). It shows that the purity of PbI2 powder influences the photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cells, and the perovskite solar cells based on recycled PbI2 displayed comparable efficiency to the devices fabricated with commercial high-purity (99.99%) PbI2.

During the whole recycling processes, the lead, front ITO/glass, and back cover glass could be recycled from degraded perovskite solar modules. The perovskite solar cells based on recycled PbI2 and perovskite solar modules based on recycled ITO/glass displayed PCE close to devices fabricated on fresh commercial raw materials (Fig. 4g, h, and Supplementary Fig. 3). Supplementary Fig. 4 shows that the recycled PbI2 and recycled ITO/glass substrates did not compromise the photovoltaic stability of perovskite solar devices. Moreover, the DMF organic solvent and regenerated cation-exchange resin could be reused to reduce the cost of recycling process. The regenerated WAC-gel resin displayed similar lead-adsorption performance as the fresh resin (Fig. 4i). Supplementary Fig. 5 shows that the WAC-gel resin had excellent lead-adsorption performance in different organic solvents, aqueous solution, as well as solvents with a wide range of pH values. This makes it easy for the fresh and regenerated resin to recover lead from different types of lead-containing solutions.

Cost analysis

A technoeconomic assessment was carried out to understand the potential cost saving for the recycling technology for perovskite solar modules. Here we mainly consider the material cost. As shown in Table 1, the calculated total material cost for perovskite solar module based on structure in Fig. 2a was ~$24.8 /m2, similar as the cost modeling by Li et al. and Cai et al.45,46. The total value of recycled components, including front ITO/glass, PbI2, and back cover glass, was around$12/m2. Since the perovskite raw material itself constitutes a very small portion of the material cost in perovskite solar modules, the saving of material cost from recycled lead as PbI2 is not large. The majority of the material cost saving comes from expensive ITO glass and cover glass45,46,47,48,49,50,51. The recycling process does consume materials, including DMF, cation-exchange resin, DCB, HNO3, and NaI, while some of them can be reused for multiple cycles. For 1-m2 perovskite solar module with 1-μm-thick lead halide perovskite layer, it needs around 63 g of DMF to dissolve them for 0.1 M perovskite solution, 20 g of resin for three WAC-gel-adsorption treatments, 4 g of DCB for C60 removal52, 2.5 g of nitric acid for lead release, and 2.7 g of NaI for lead conversion. Based on this recycling process, the material consumption for recycling the perovskite solar module was $4.24 /m2 if these materials were used only once. The material cost could further be decreased to$1.35 /m2 if reusing DMF and resin for five times, which is around one order of magnitude lower than the overall value of recycled components. Besides removal of the toxic lead from end-of-life perovskite solar modules to avoid the environmental pollution, this recycling technique brings in dramatic revenue to make recycling compelling. Recycled components could provide energy savings compared with the production of new materials, and they provide another source of raw materials that is not dependent on primary mining and could relieve some supply chain constraints as well.

Discussion

In conclusion, we developed a recycling technology for end-of-life perovskite solar modules that not only recycled the toxic lead to avoid the environmental pollution but also recycled valuable glass components as cost-effective method. The recycling process included thermal delamination to disassemble modules with intact glass substrates and efficient ion exchange to separate and recycle lead from organic solvent. The carboxylic acid cation-exchange resin showed high lead-adsorption ratio to separate lead from lead-containing solution, as well as high lead-release ratio during resin-regeneration process to recover lead ions as soluble Pb(NO3)2 and then convert to PbI2 precipitate for reuse. This method could recycle both the toxic lead and valuable ITO/glass and back cover-glass substrates from decommissioned perovskite solar modules for device refabrication. There was no obvious photovoltaic performance drop for the perovskite solar devices based on recycled PbI2 or recycled ITO/glass compared with the fresh counterparts. This provides a cost-effective recycling method for a close-loop lead management for perovskite solar modules to avoid the environmental pollution, which could significantly accelerate the penetration of perovskite photovoltaic technologies into the clean and renewable energy market.

Methods

Materials

Carboxylic acid cation-exchange resin WAC-gel (WACG-HP, gel type, hydrogen form) and WAC-MP (WACMP, macroporous type, hydrogen form) and sulfonic acid cation-exchange resin SAC-MP (SACMP-H, macroporous type, hydrogen form) were purchased from ResinTech Inc. Sulfonic acid cation-exchange resin SAC-gel (Amberlite® IRC120 H, gel type, hydrogen form), Lead(II) iodide (99%), PTAA (average Mn 7000–10,000), bathocuproine (BCP), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 2-methoxyethanol (2-ME), 1,2-Dichlorobenzene, toluene, isopropyl alcohol, phenylethyl ammonium chloride, and Pb standard solution (1000 ± 2 ppm) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Lead(II) iodide (99.99%, trace-metal basis) was purchased from TCI America. Formamidinium iodide (FAI) and formamidinium chloride were purchased from GreatCell Solar. C60 was purchased from Nano-C Inc. Copper (Cu) and chromium (Cr) for thermal evaporation were purchased from Kurt J. Lesker company.

Fabrication of perovskite solar cells and modules

Prepatterned ITO glass substrates (1.5 cm by 1.5 cm for solar cells and 6.5 cm by 8.5 cm for solar modules) were first cleaned by ultrasonication with soap, deionized water, isopropyl alcohol, and acetone, and then UV ozone was treated for 15 min before use. The PTAA solution with a concentration of 2.2 mg/mL in toluene was blade-coated on ITO/glass substrate at 20 mm/s with 200-µm coating gap. The perovskite film coating was similar to previous studies9. The Cs0.1FA0.9PbI3 perovskite films were blade-coated at 20 mm/s with 250-µm coating gap at room temperature under nitrogen knife blowing by using a precursor solution containing 1.0 M FAPbI3 and 0.11 M CsPbI3 dissolved in a 2-ME/DMSO solvent mixture, where the precursor was filtered by PTFE filter with pore size of 0.2 µm before use. Formamidinium hypophosphite, formamidinium chloride, and phenylethyl ammonium chloride were added into the solution as additives at molar percentages of ~1.0%, ~1.5%, and ~0.15% to Pb2+ ions, respectively. The as-coated solid film was annealed at 150 °C in air for 3 min. Then the perovskite films were thermally evaporated with C60 (30 nm), BCP (6 nm), and Cu (150 nm) to complete the perovskite solar cell fabrication. For fabricating modules, laser ablation was applied before and after the deposition of the metal electrode (30 nm of Cr and 150 nm of Cu) to complete the series interconnection between subcells in the module.

Module encapsulation and delamination

Perovskite solar module was encapsulated by a back cover glass using a Gorilla epoxy coated at the top sides of the glass and then cured for one night. The encapsulant layer thickness after drying was around 300 µm. The module delamination was carried out by placing the encapsulated perovskite solar module on a hot plate at 250 °C for 2 min. The encapsulant was softened and melt, and then a knife blade inserted between ITO/glass substrate and back cover glass at one corner of the module to detach the two glass substrates. The perovskite layer on delaminated ITO/glass substrate was dissolved by DMF for the subsequently lead-recycling process.

Device characterizations

The power conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cell and solar module was characterized by J–V measurement under a xenon lamp based solar simulator (Oriel Sol3A, Class AAA Solar Simulator). The light intensity was calibrated to 100 mW cm−2 by a silicon reference cell (Newport 91150-KG5). For perovskite solar cells, a metal mask with an aperture area of 6.08 mm2 (3.8 mm × 1.6 mm) aligned with the device area. The J–V curves were measured by a Keithley 2400 source meter with a backward and forward scan rate of 0.1 V s−1 with a delay time of 10 ms in air at room temperature. To measure the long-term operational stability, the encapsulated devices and modules was illuminated by a 1-sun-equivalent LED light. External quantum efficiency data were obtained with a Newport QE measurement kit by focusing a monochromatic beam of light onto the device. The XRD patterns were obtained by a Rigaku sixth-generation MiniFlex X-ray diffractometer.

Reporting summary

Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

1. 1.

Jena, A. K., Kulkarni, A. & Miyasaka, T. Halide perovskite photovoltaics: Background, status, and future prospects. Chem. Rev. 119, 3036–3103 (2019).

2. 2.

Huang, J., Yuan, Y., Shao, Y. & Yan, Y. Understanding the physical properties of hybrid perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17042 (2017).

3. 3.

NREL. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html. (2021).

4. 4.

Deng, Y. et al. Tailoring solvent coordination for high-speed, room-temperature blading of perovskite photovoltaic films. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax7537 (2019).

5. 5.

Subbiah, A. S. et al. High-performance perovskite single-junction and textured perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells via slot-die-coating. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 3034–3040 (2020).

6. 6.

Das, S. et al. High-performance flexible perovskite solar cells by using a combination of ultrasonic spray-coating and low thermal budget photonic curing. ACS Photonics 2, 680–686 (2015).

7. 7.

Yin, W.-J., Shi, T. & Yan, Y. Unusual defect physics in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cell absorber. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 063903 (2014).

8. 8.

Li, Z. et al. Scalable fabrication of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 18017 (2018).

9. 9.

Deng, Y. et al. Defect compensation in formamidinium-cesium perovskites for highly efficient and stable solar modules. Nat. Energy 6, 633–641 (2021).

10. 10.

Extance, A. The reality behind solar power’s next star material. Nature 570, 429–433 (2019).

11. 11.

Lu, H. Z. et al. Vapor-assisted deposition of highly efficient, stable black-phase FAPbI3 perovskite solar cells. Science 370, eabb8985 (2020).

12. 12.

Jeong, J. et al. Pseudo-halide anion engineering for alpha-FAPbI3 perovskite solar cells. Nature 592, 381–385 (2021).

13. 13.

Jung, E. H. et al. Efficient, stable and scalable perovskite solar cells using poly(3-hexylthiophene). Nature 567, 511–515 (2019).

14. 14.

Jiang, Q. et al. Surface passivation of perovskite film for efficient solar cells. Nat. Photonics 13, 460–466 (2019).

15. 15.

Chen, S. S., Xiao, X., Gu, H. Y. & Huang, J. S. Iodine reduction for reproducible and high-performance perovskite solar cells and modules. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe8130 (2021).

16. 16.

Hao, F., Stoumpos, C. C., Cao, D. H., Chang, R. P. H. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Lead-free solid-state organic-inorganic halide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 8, 489–494 (2014).

17. 17.

Jiang, X. Y. et al. Ultra-high open-circuit voltage of tin perovskite solar cells via an electron transporting layer design. Nat. Commun. 11, 1245 (2020).

18. 18.

Yang, X. Q., Wang, W., Ran, R., Zhou, W. & Shao, Z. P. Recent advances in Cs2AgBiBr6-based halide double perovskites as lead-free and inorganic light absorbers for perovskite solar cells. Energy Fuels 34, 10513–10528 (2020).

19. 19.
20. 20.

Li, X. et al. On-device lead sequestration for perovskite solar cells. Nature 578, 555–558 (2020).

21. 21.

Chen, S. et al. Trapping lead in perovskite solar modules with abundant and low-cost cation-exchange resins. Nat. Energy 5, 1003–1011 (2020).

22. 22.

Chen, S. et al. Preventing lead leakage with built-in resin layers for sustainable perovskite solar cells. Nat. Sustain. 4, 636–643 (2021).

23. 23.

Heath, G. A. et al. Research and development priorities for silicon photovoltaic module recycling to support a circular economy. Nat. Energy 5, 502–510 (2020).

24. 24.

Deng, R., Chang, N. L., Ouyang, Z. & Chong, C. M. A techno-economic review of silicon photovoltaic module recycling. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 109, 532–550 (2019).

25. 25.

Chowdhury, M. S. et al. An overview of solar photovoltaic panels’ end-of-life material recycling. Energy Strategy Rev. 27, 100431 (2020).

26. 26.

Liu, F.-W. et al. Recycling and recovery of perovskite solar cells. Mater. Today 43, 185–197 (2021).

27. 27.

Zhang, S. et al. Cyclic utilization of lead in carbon-based perovskite solar cells. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 7558–7564 (2018).

28. 28.

Kim, B. J. et al. Selective dissolution of halide perovskites as a step towards recycling solar cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 11735 (2016).

29. 29.

Poll, C. G. et al. Electrochemical recycling of lead from hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites using deep eutectic solvents. Green. Chem. 18, 2946–2955 (2016).

30. 30.

Kadro, J. M. et al. Proof-of-concept for facile perovskite solar cell recycling. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3172–3179 (2016).

31. 31.

Gonzalez, M., Trócoli, R., Pavlovic, I., Barriga, C. & La Mantia, F. Capturing Cd (II) and Pb (II) from contaminated water sources by electro-deposition on hydrotalcite-like compounds. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 1838–1845 (2016).

32. 32.

Kim, T.-y., Jeung, S.-Y., Cho, S.-Y., Kang, Y. & Kim, S.-J. Removal and regeneration of heavy metal ions using cation exchange column. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 10, 695–700 (2004).

33. 33.

Goel, J., Kadirvelu, K., Rajagopal, C. & Garg, V. K. Removal of lead (II) by adsorption using treated granular activated carbon: batch and column studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 125, 211–220 (2005).

34. 34.

Matlock, M. M., Howerton, B. S. & Atwood, D. A. Chemical precipitation of lead from lead battery recycling plant wastewater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 1579–1582 (2002).

35. 35.

Dean, J. G., Bosqui, F. L. & Lanouette, K. H. Removing heavy metals from waste water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 6, 518–522 (1972).

36. 36.

Abdullah, N. et al. Polysulfone/hydrous ferric oxide ultrafiltration mixed matrix membrane: preparation, characterization and its adsorptive removal of lead (II) from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 289, 28–37 (2016).

37. 37.

Park, S. Y. et al. Sustainable lead management in halide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Sustain. 3, 1044–1051 (2020).

38. 38.

Deng, Y. et al. Reduced self-doping of perovskites induced by short annealing for efficient solar modules. Joule 4, 1949–1960 (2020).

39. 39.

Shi, L. et al. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses of encapsulated stable perovskite solar cells. Science 368, 1328 (2020).

40. 40.

Cheacharoen, R. et al. Encapsulating perovskite solar cells to withstand damp heat and thermal cycling. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2, 2398–2406 (2018).

41. 41.

Jiang, Y. et al. Reduction of lead leakage from damaged lead halide perovskite solar modules using self-healing polymer-based encapsulation. Nat. Energy 4, 585–593 (2019).

42. 42.

Kunin, R. & Barry, R. E. Carboxylic, weak acid type, cation exchange resin. Ind. Eng. Chem. 41, 1269–1272 (1949).

43. 43.

Fil, B. A., Boncukcuoğlu, R., Yilmaz, A. E. & Bayar, S. Adsorption of Ni (II) on ion exchange resin: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Korean. J. Chem. Eng. 29, 1232–1238 (2012).

44. 44.

Rengaraj, S., Kim, Y., Joo, C. K., Choi, K. & Yi, J. Batch adsorptive removal of copper ions in aqueous solutions by ion exchange resins: 1200H and IRN97H. Korean. J. Chem. Eng. 21, 187–194 (2004).

45. 45.

Li, Z. et al. Cost analysis of perovskite tandem photovoltaics. Joule 2, 1559–1572 (2018).

46. 46.

Cai, M. et al. Cost-performance analysis of perovskite solar modules. Adv. Sci. 4, 1600269 (2016).

47. 47.

Chang, N. L. et al. Manufacturing cost and market potential analysis of demonstrated roll-to-roll perovskite photovoltaic cell processes. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 174, 314–324 (2018).

48. 48.

Chang, N. L. et al. A manufacturing cost estimation method with uncertainty analysis and its application to perovskite on glass photovoltaic modules. Prog. Photovolt. 25, 390–405 (2017).

49. 49.

Song, Z. N. et al. A technoeconomic analysis of perovskite solar module manufacturing with low-cost materials and techniques. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1297–1305 (2017).

50. 50.

Horowitz, K. A. et al. An analysis of the cost and performance of photovoltaic systems as a function of module area (National Renewable Energy Lab, 2017).

51. 51.

Louwen, A., Van Sark, W., Schropp, R. & Faaij, A. A cost roadmap for silicon heterojunction solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 147, 295–314 (2016).

52. 52.

Wang, C. I. & Hua, C. C. Solubility of C60 and PCBM in organic solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 14496–14504 (2015).

Acknowledgements

This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation Award Number 2050357 and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under Solar Energy Technologies Office (SETO) Agreement Number DE-EE0008749. The authors thank the help from Dr. Marina Sokolsky at UNC Nanomedicines Characterization Core Facility (NCore) during ICP-MS measurement.

Author information

Authors

Contributions

B.C. and J.H. conceived the idea. B.C. designed the experiment. B.C., S.C., and X.X. carried out the lead-recycling test. B.C. conducted the module thermal delamination. C.F. and H.G. fabricated the perovskite solar cells and perovskite solar modules. B.C. and J.H. wrote the paper, and all authors reviewed the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinsong Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Chen, B., Fei, C., Chen, S. et al. Recycling lead and transparent conductors from perovskite solar modules. Nat Commun 12, 5859 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26121-1