Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Intravital measurements of solid stresses in tumours reveal length-scale and microenvironmentally dependent force transmission

Nature Biomedical Engineering volume 7, pages 1473–1492 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

In cancer, solid stresses impede the delivery of therapeutics to tumours and the trafficking and tumour infiltration of immune cells. Understanding such consequences and the origin of solid stresses requires their probing in vivo at the cellular scale. Here we report a method for performing volumetric and longitudinal measurements of solid stresses in vivo, and findings from its applicability to tumours. We used multimodal intravital microscopy of fluorescently labelled polyacrylamide beads injected in breast tumours in mice as well as mathematical modelling to compare solid stresses at the single-cell and tissue scales, in primary and metastatic tumours, in vitro and in mice, and in live mice and post-mortem tissue. We found that solid-stress transmission is scale dependent, with tumour cells experiencing lower stresses than their embedding tissue, and that tumour cells in lung metastases experience substantially higher solid stresses than those in the primary tumours. The dependence of solid stresses on length scale and the microenvironment may inform the development of therapeutics that sensitize cancer cells to such mechanical forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The workflow of in vivo solid stress measurement in primary and metastatic tumours.
Fig. 2: Validation and sensitivity analysis of solid stress measurement at the cellular and tissue scales in vivo.
Fig. 3: Solid stress transmission is scale dependent: in vivo solid stresses experienced by cancer cells at the cellular scale is significantly lower than solid stresses experienced at the tissue scale.
Fig. 4: Longitudinal and spatial measurements of solid stresses in vivo at the cellular scale.
Fig. 5: Measurement of solid stress in breast cancer lung metastases in a functioning lung.
Fig. 6: Measurement of solid stresses that individual cells experience in blood vessels using cellular-scale beads as surrogates for single cells.
Fig. 7: In vitro models of tumours faithfully model the solid stresses levels in vivo at the cellular scale.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the results in this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. The raw and analysed datasets generated during the study are too large to be publicly shared, yet they are available for research purposes from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

MATLAB codes are available at https://github.com/suezhangBU/solid_stress.

References

  1. Nia, H. T., Munn, L. L. & Jain, R. K. Physical traits of cancer. Science 370, 6516 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kechagia, J. Z., Ivaska, J. & Roca-Cusachs, P. Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 457–473 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benham-Pyle, B. W., Pruitt, B. L. & Nelson, W. J. Mechanical strain induces E-cadherin-dependent Yap1 and β-catenin activation to drive cell cycle entry. Science 348, 1024–1027 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Munn, L. L. & Nia, H. T. Mechanosensing tensile solid stresses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 21960–21962 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Levayer, R. Solid stress, competition for space and cancer: the opposing roles of mechanical cell competition in tumour initiation and growth. Semin. Cancer Biol. 63, 69–80 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, M. L. et al. Force-induced unfolding of fibronectin in the extracellular matrix of living cells. PLoS Biol. 5, e268 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Saini, K., Cho, S., Dooling, L. J. & Discher, D. E. Tension in fibrils suppresses their enzymatic degradation—a molecular mechanism for ‘use it or lose it’. Matrix Biol. 85-86, 34–46 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubow, K. E. et al. Mechanical forces regulate the interactions of fibronectin and collagen I in extracellular matrix. Nat. Commun. 6, 8026 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirby, T. J. & Lammerding, J. Emerging views of the nucleus as a cellular mechanosensor. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 373–381 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho, S., Irianto, J. & Discher, D. E. Mechanosensing by the nucleus: from pathways to scaling relationships. J. Cell Biol. 216, 305–315 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chauhan, V. P. et al. Angiotensin inhibition enhances drug delivery and potentiates chemotherapy by decompressing tumour blood vessels. Nat. Commun. 4, 2516 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Padera, T. P. et al. Cancer cells compress intratumour vessels. Nature 427, 695 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stylianopoulos, T. et al. Causes, consequences, and remedies for growth-induced solid stress in murine and human tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 15101–15108 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mpekris, F. et al. Normalizing the microenvironment overcomes vessel compression and resistance to nano-immunotherapy in breast cancer lung metastasis. Adv. Sci. 8, 2001917 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain, R. K. Antiangiogenesis strategies revisited: from starving tumors to alleviating hypoxia. Cancer Cell. 26, 605–622 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Munn, L. L. & Jain, R. K. Vascular regulation of antitumor immunity. Science 365, 544–545 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones, D. et al. Solid stress impairs lymphocyte infiltration into lymph-node metastases. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1426–1436 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tse, J. M. et al. Mechanical compression drives cancer cells toward invasive phenotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 911–916 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Das, J. & Maiti, T. K. in Autophagy in Tumor and Tumor Microenvironment Ch. 8, 171–182 (Springer, 2020).

  20. Fernandez-Sanchez, M. E. et al. Mechanical induction of the tumorigenic β-catenin pathway by tumour growth pressure. Nature 523, 92–95 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seano, G. et al. Solid stress in brain tumours causes neuronal loss and neurological dysfunction and can be reversed by lithium. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 230–245 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nia, H. T. et al. In vivo compression and imaging in mouse brain to measure the effects of solid stress. Nat. Protoc. 15, 2321–2340 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Panagi, M. et al. Polymeric micelles effectively reprogram the tumor microenvironment to potentiate nano-immunotherapy in mouse breast cancer models. Nat. Commun. 13, 7165 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Provenzano, P. P. et al. Enzymatic targeting of the stroma ablates physical barriers to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 21, 418–429 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, Y. et al. Losartan treatment enhances chemotherapy efficacy and reduces ascites in ovarian cancer models by normalizing the tumor stroma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2210–2219 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Proton w/FOLFIRINOX-losartan for pancreatic cancer; identifier NCT01821729. ClinicalTrials.gov https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01821729 (2020).

  27. Murphy, J. E. et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX in combination with losartan followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 5, 1020–1027 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nia, H. T. et al. Quantifying solid stress and elastic energy from excised or in situ tumors. Nat. Protoc. 13, 1091–1105 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nia, H. T. et al. Solid stress and elastic energy as measures of tumour mechanopathology. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 0004 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Voutouri, C. et al. Role of constitutive behavior and tumor–host mechanical interactions in the state of stress and growth of solid tumors. PLoS ONE 9, e104717 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dolega, M. E. et al. Cell-like pressure sensors reveal increase of mechanical stress towards the core of multicellular spheroids under compression. Nat. Commun. 8, 14056 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Helmlinger, G. et al. Solid stress inhibits the growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. Nat. Biotechnol. 15, 778–783 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shah, M. K., Leary, E. A. & Darling, E. M. Integration of hyper-compliant microparticles into a 3D melanoma tumor model. J. Biomech. 82, 46–53 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Islam, M. T., Tasciotti, E. & Righetti, R. Non-invasive imaging of normalized solid stress in cancers in vivo. IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Health Med. 7, 4300209 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Islam, M. T. & Righetti, R. A new poroelastography method to assess the solid stress distribution in cancers. IEEE Access. 7, 103404–103415 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Islam, M. T. & Righetti, R. A novel finite element model to assess the effect of solid stress inside tumors on elastographic normal strains and fluid pressure. J. Eng. Sci. Med Diagn. Ther. 2, 031006 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wagstaff, L. et al. Mechanical cell competition kills cells via induction of lethal p53 levels. Nat. Commun. 7, 11373 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Takao, S., Taya, M. & Chiew, C. Mechanical stress-induced cell death in breast cancer cells. Biol. Open. 8, bio043133 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Matamoro-Vidal, A. & Levayer, R. Multiple influences of mechanical forces on cell competition. Curr. Biol. 29, R762–R774 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McGrail, D. J. et al. Osmotic regulation is required for cancer cell survival under solid stress. Biophys. J. 109, 1334–1337 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hepworth, D. G., Steven-fountain, A., Bruce, D. M. & Vincent, J. F. Affine versus non-affine deformation in soft biological tissues, measured by the reorientation and stretching of collagen fibres through the thickness of compressed porcine skin. J. Biomech. 34, 341–346 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Guilak, F. & Mow, V. C. The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 33, 1663–1673 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chan, V. W. L. et al. Image-based multi-scale mechanical analysis of strain amplification in neurons embedded in collagen gel. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 22, 113–129 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Girardo, S. et al. Standardized microgel beads as elastic cell mechanical probes. J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 6245–6261 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, W. et al. Dispersible hydrogel force sensors reveal patterns of solid mechanical stress in multicellular spheroid cultures. Nat. Commun. 10, 144 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Li, W. et al. Combining losartan with radiotherapy increases tumor control and inhibits lung metastases from a HER2/neu-positive orthotopic breast cancer model. Radiat. Oncol. 16, 48 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Borriello, L., Condeelis, J., Entenberg, D. & Oktay, M. H. Breast cancer cell re-dissemination from lung metastases—a mechanism for enhancing metastatic burden. J. Clin. Med. 10, 2340 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Traber, N. et al. Polyacrylamide bead sensors for in vivo quantification of cell-scale stress in zebrafish development. Sci. Rep. 9, 17031 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Boudou, T. et al. Nonlinear elastic properties of polyacrylamide gels: implications for quantification of cellular forces. Biorheology 46, 191–205 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Islam, M. T. et al. Non-invasive imaging of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio in cancers in vivo. Sci. Rep. 10, 7266 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Stylianopoulos, T. & Jain, R. K. Combining two strategies to improve perfusion and drug delivery in solid tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18632–18637 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Jacobetz, M. A. et al. Hyaluronan impairs vascular function and drug delivery in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Gut 62, 112–120 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Islam, M. T., Tang, S. & Righetti, R. Non-invasive assessment of the spatial and temporal distributions of interstitial fluid pressure, fluid velocity and fluid flow in cancers in vivo. IEEE Access. 89222–89233 (2021).

  54. Chauhan, V. P. et al. Compression of pancreatic tumor blood vessels by hyaluronan is caused by solid stress and not interstitial fluid pressure. Cancer Cell 26, 14–15 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Boucher, Y., Baxter, L. T. & Jain, R. K. Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. Cancer Res. 50, 4478–4484 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zanetti-Dallenbach, R. et al. Length scale matters: real-time elastography versus nanomechanical profiling by atomic force microscopy for the diagnosis of breast lesions. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 3840597 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Plodinec, M. et al. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 757–765 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Padera, T. P. et al. Differential response of primary tumor versus lymphatic metastasis to VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 kinase inhibitors cediranib and vandetanib. Mol. Cancer Ther. 7, 2272–2279 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Labriola, N. R., Mathiowitz, E. & Darling, E. M. Fabricating polyacrylamide microbeads by inverse emulsification to mimic the size and elasticity of living cells. Biomater. Sci. 5, 41–45 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Solis, A. G. et al. Mechanosensation of cyclical force by PIEZO1 is essential for innate immunity. Nature 573, 69–74 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Maruyama, K., Nemoto, E. & Yamada, S. Mechanical regulation of macrophage function—cyclic tensile force inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent IL-1β secretion in murine macrophages. Inflamm. Regen. 39, 3 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Li, C., Hu, Y., Mayr, M. & Xu, Q. Cyclic strain stress-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase 1 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells is regulated by Ras/Rac-MAPK pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 25273–25280 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Stylianopoulos, T. et al. Coevolution of solid stress and interstitial fluid pressure in tumors during progression: implications for vascular collapse. Cancer Res. 73, 3833–3841 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Limjunyawong, N., Fallica, J., Horton, M. R. & Mitzner, W. Measurement of the pressure-volume curve in mouse lungs. J. Vis. Exp. 95, 52376 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Banerji, R. et al. Probing lung function at high spatiotemporal resolution using a novel crystal ribcage. Nat. Methods (in press).

  66. Vinci, M. et al. Advances in establishment and analysis of three-dimensional tumor spheroid-based functional assays for target validation and drug evaluation. BMC Biol. 10, 29 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Kodack, D. P. et al. The brain microenvironment mediates resistance in luminal breast cancer to PI3K inhibition through HER3 activation. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaal4682 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Campas, O. et al. Quantifying cell-generated mechanical forces within living embryonic tissues. Nat. Methods 11, 183–189 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Gross, B., Shelton, E., Gomez, C. & Campàs, O. STRESS, an automated geometrical characterization of deformable particles for in vivo measurements of cell and tissue mechanical stresses. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.437148 (2021).

  70. Voutouri, C. & Stylianopoulos, T. Accumulation of mechanical forces in tumors is related to hyaluronan content and tissue stiffness. PLoS ONE 13, e0193801 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Chauhan, V. P. et al. Reprogramming the microenvironment with tumor-selective angiotensin blockers enhances cancer immunotherapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10674–10680 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Martin, J. D., Seano, G. & Jain, R. K. Normalizing function of tumor vessels: progress, opportunities, and challenges. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 81, 505–534 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Cleaver, O. & Melton, D. A. Endothelial signaling during development. Nat. Med. 9, 661–668 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Jain, R. K. Normalizing tumor microenvironment to treat cancer: bench to bedside to biomarkers. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 2205–2218 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Jain, R. K. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 307, 58–62 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Stylianopoulos, T., Munn, L. L. & Jain, R. K. Reengineering the physical microenvironment of tumors to improve drug delivery and efficacy: from mathematical modeling to bench to bedside. Trends Cancer 4, 292–319 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Nava, M. M. et al. Heterochromatin-driven nuclear softening protects the genome against mechanical stress-induced damage. Cell 181, 800–817 e822 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Wirtz, D., Konstantopoulos, K. & Searson, P. C. The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 512–522 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Lefrancais, E. et al. The lung is a site of platelet biogenesis and a reservoir for haematopoietic progenitors. Nature 544, 105–109 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Kedrin, D. et al. Intravital imaging of metastatic behavior through a mammary imaging window. Nat. Methods 5, 1019–1021 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Pittet, M. J. & Weissleder, R. Intravital imaging. Cell 147, 983–991 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Tse, J. R. & Engler, A. J. Preparation of hydrogel substrates with tunable mechanical properties. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 10, 16 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Chen, I. X. et al. Blocking CXCR4 alleviates desmoplasia, increases T-lymphocyte infiltration, and improves immunotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 4558–4566 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Muzumdar, M. D. et al. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Vanderpool, R. R. & Chesler, N. C. Characterization of the isolated, ventilated, and instrumented mouse lung perfused with pulsatile flow. J. Vis. Exp. 50, 2690 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Kovac, B., Fehrenbach, J., Guillaume, L. & Weiss, P. FitEllipsoid: a fast supervised ellipsoid segmentation plugin. BMC Bioinf. 20, 142 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Moller, T. A fast triangle–triangle intersection test. J. Graph Tools 2, 25–30 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Danso, E. K., Julkunen, P. & Korhonen, R. K. Poisson’s ratio of bovine meniscus determined combining unconfined and confined compression. J. Biomech. 77, 233–237 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Tarasova, N. et al. The new approach to the preparation of polyacrylamide-based hydrogels: initiation of polymerization of acrylamide with 1,3-dimethylimidazolium (phosphonooxy-)oligosulphanide under drying aqueous solutions. Polymers 13, 1806 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Cheng, G., Tse, J., Jain, R. K. & Munn, L. L. Micro-environmental mechanical stress controls tumor spheroid size and morphology by suppressing proliferation and inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. PLoS ONE 4, e4632 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Hutter, J. L. & Bechhoefer, J. Calibration of atomic‐force microscope tips. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 1868–1873 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Roose, T. et al. Solid stress generated by spheroid growth estimated using a linear poroelasticity model. Microvasc. Res. 66, 204–212 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Netti, P. A. et al. Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors. Cancer Res. 60, 2497–2503 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Dimitriadis, E. K. et al. Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 82, 2798–2810 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Neurophotonics Center at Boston University for their generous support and access to their facility. Research reported in this publication was supported by the Boston University Micro and Nano Imaging Facility and the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health of the National Institutes of Health under award number S10OD024993. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Health. H.T.N. discloses support for the research described in this study from the National Institutes of Health (DP2HL168562 and R21EB031332, to H.T.N.), Beckman Young Investigator Award (to H.T.N.), Boston University Center for Multiscale and Translational Mechanobiology (to S. Zhang, K.R. and H.T.N.), and the American Cancer Society Institutional Fund at Boston University (to H.T.N.). M.W.G. discloses support from the National Institutes of Health (T32EB006359 to S. Zhang and M.W.G.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

    Sue Zhang, Gabrielle Grifno, Rachel Passaro, Kathryn Regan, Siyi Zheng, Muhamed Hadzipasic, Rohin Banerji, Logan O’Connor, Vinson Chu, Sung Yeon Kim, Jiarui Yang, Linzheng Shi, Kavon Karrobi, Darren Roblyer, Mark W. Grinstaff & Hadi T. Nia

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Muhamed Hadzipasic

  3. Department of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

    Mark W. Grinstaff

Authors
  1. Sue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabrielle Grifno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rachel Passaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kathryn Regan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Siyi Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhamed Hadzipasic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rohin Banerji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Logan O’Connor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Vinson Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sung Yeon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jiarui Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Linzheng Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Kavon Karrobi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Darren Roblyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Mark W. Grinstaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Hadi T. Nia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S. Zhang and H.T.N. conceived the project and wrote the manuscript; S. Zhang conducted most of the experiments, performed data analysis and generated the experimental mice; R.P. assisted with collecting and analysing spheroid data; K.R. generated the image segmentation and ellipsoid-fitting codes; M.H. collected Young’s modulus data of cells, spheroids and tumours with AFM; G.G. generated lung metastasis models and performed lung extraction and imaging; S. Zheng collected mechanical data on PA hydrogels; L.O. assisted with the design and fabrication of the intravital window and imaging stage; V.C. assisted with PA bead fabrication; S.Y.K. assisted with generating code for defining bead deformations; J.Y. assisted with OCT imaging; R.B. provided materials for lung imaging; L.S. performed liver and brain experiments, K.K., D.R. and M.W.G. contributed to discussions on crucial aspects of the project; H.T.N. supervised the project and provided guidance on experimental design, data interpretation and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadi T. Nia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Window implantation after tumour growth causes artificial compression.

a, Methodology and timeline for tumour induction. The outlined image was taken using a fluorescent stereomicroscope. b, After showing that window implantation after tumour formation applies artificial compression, which relaxes over 6 days, we switched to window implantation before the tumour induction. Window implantation before tumour induction does not alter the solid-stress level (Fig. 2h). The XZ and XY views of the bead (E = 1.3 ± 0.13 kPa) in the tumour at days 0, 3, and 6, captured with OCT. c, Aspect ratios of polyacrylamide beads over time (mean ± STD, n = 3–6 beads).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Longitudinal in vivo imaging of MCa-M3C-H2B-dendra2 tumours at the cellular and tissue scale.

a, Cellular-scale beads (0.77 ± 0.16 kPa) were imaged up to 7 days via two-photon microscopy (cancer cells (green), polyacrylamide beads (magenta)). b, Tissue-scale beads (E = 1.3 ± 0.13 kPa) were tracked up to 14 days via optical coherence microscopy (polyacrylamide bead (outlined in yellow)). The experiments were performed independently in 3 (cellular scale) and 2 (tissue scale) mice, with similar results.

Supplementary information

Source data

Source data

Source data for the tumour-growth plot shown in Supplementary Fig. 7.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Grifno, G., Passaro, R. et al. Intravital measurements of solid stresses in tumours reveal length-scale and microenvironmentally dependent force transmission. Nat. Biomed. Eng 7, 1473–1492 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01080-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01080-8

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer