Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ultraflexible electrode arrays for months-long high-density electrophysiological mapping of thousands of neurons in rodents

Abstract

Penetrating flexible electrode arrays can simultaneously record thousands of individual neurons in the brains of live animals. However, it has been challenging to spatially map and longitudinally monitor the dynamics of large three-dimensional neural networks. Here we show that optimized ultraflexible electrode arrays distributed across multiple cortical regions in head-fixed mice and in freely moving rats allow for months-long stable electrophysiological recording of several thousand neurons at densities of about 1,000 neural units per cubic millimetre. The chronic recordings enhanced decoding accuracy during optogenetic stimulation and enabled the detection of strongly coupled neuron pairs at the million-pair and millisecond scales, and thus the inference of patterns of directional information flow. Longitudinal and volumetric measurements of neural couplings may facilitate the study of large-scale neural circuits.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of the large-scale modular NET technology.
Fig. 2: Overview of the recording performance.
Fig. 3: Volumetric high-density mapping of the visual cortex in an awake head-fixed mouse.
Fig. 4: Visual decoding using large-scale neural recordings.
Fig. 5: Simultaneous volumetric recording and optogenetic stimulation.
Fig. 6: Large-scale distributed recording in awake head-fixed mice and behaviour decoding.
Fig. 7: Chronic stability of large-scale recordings by NETs, and evaluation of network stability over time.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the results of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. The datasets generated during the study are too large to be publicly shared. Sample data are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Code availability

Mountainsort3, which we used for spike sorting, is not maintained anymore, but Mountainsort4 is available at https://github.com/magland/ml_ms4alg. Deeplabcut, for animal-posture extraction, is available at https://github.com/DeepLabCut/DeepLabCut. Facemap, for animal-posture extraction, is available at https://github.com/MouseLand/facemap. Visual stimulus decoder was adapted into Matlab code, but Python code is available from the original author at https://github.com/MouseLand/stringer-et-al-2019. BehaveNet for video latent extraction is available at https://github.com/themattinthehatt/behavenet. The LSTM neural decoder is available at https://github.com/KordingLab/Neural_Decoding. The remaining analyses were done with custom Matlab routines, which are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

References

  1. Braitenberg, V. & Schüz, A. Anatomy of the Cortex: Statistics and Geometry (Springer, 1991).

  2. Kleinfeld, D. et al. Can one concurrently record electrical spikes from every neuron in a mammalian brain? Neuron 103, 1005–1015 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Marblestone, A. H. et al. Physical principles for scalable neural recording. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 7, 137 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, T. W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Adam, Y. et al. All-optical electrophysiology reveals brain-state dependent changes in hippocampal subthreshold dynamics and excitability. Nature 569, 413 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung, J. E. et al. High-density, long-lasting, and multi-region electrophysiological recordings using polymer electrode arrays. Neuron 101, 21–31.e5 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jun, J. J. et al. Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity. Nature 551, 232 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Steinmetz, N. A. et al. Neuropixels 2.0: a miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings. Science 372, eabf4588 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. He, F., Lycke, R., Ganji, M., Xie, C. & Luan, L. Ultraflexible neural electrodes for long-lasting intracortical recording. iScience 23, 101387 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Luan, L. et al. Ultraflexible nanoelectronic probes form reliable, glial scar-free neural integration. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601966 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, E. N., Kass, R. E. & Mitra, P. P. Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 456–461 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei, X. et al. Nanofabricated ultraflexible electrode arrays for high-density intracortical recording. Adv. Sci. 5, 1700625 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, Z. et al. Parallel, minimally-invasive implantation of ultra-flexible neural electrode arrays. J. Neural Eng. 16, 035001 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chung, J. E. et al. Chronic implantation of multiple flexible polymer electrode arrays. J. Vis. Exp. 152, e59957 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chung, J. E. et al. A fully automated approach to spike sorting. Neuron 95, 1381–1394.e6 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Siegle, J. H. et al. Survey of spiking in the mouse visual system reveals functional hierarchy. Nature 592, 86–92 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Niell, C. M. & Stryker, M. P. Highly selective receptive fields in mouse visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 7520–7536 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohki, K., Chung, S., Ch’ng, Y. H., Kara, P. & Reid, R. C. Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature 433, 597–603 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lein, E. S. et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445, 168–176 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stringer, C., Michaelos, M., Tsyboulski, D., Lindo, S. E. & Pachitariu, M. High-precision coding in visual cortex. Cell 184, 2767–2778.e15 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao, Z. et al. Nanoelectronic coating enabled versatile multifunctional neural probes. Nano Lett. 17, 4588–4595 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nabavi, S. et al. Engineering a memory with LTD and LTP. Nature 511, 348–352 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Batty, E. et al. BehaveNet: nonlinear embedding and Bayesian neural decoding of behavioral videos. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15706–15717 (2019).

  24. Glaser, J. I. et al. Machine learning for neural decoding. eNeuro 7, ENEURO.0506-19.2020 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kozai, T. D. Y. et al. Ultrasmall implantable composite microelectrodes with bioactive surfaces for chronic neural interfaces. Nat. Mater. 11, 1065–1073 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Berenyi, A. et al. Large-scale, high-density (up to 512 channels) recording of local circuits in behaving animals. J. Neurophysiol. 111, 1132–1149 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Musk, E. & Neuralink An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, e16194 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kay, K. et al. Constant sub-second cycling between representations of possible futures in the hippocampus. Cell 180, 552–567.e25 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Trautmann, E. M. et al. Accurate estimation of neural population dynamics without spike sorting. Neuron 103, 292–308 e294 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rolston, J. D., Gross, R. E. & Potter, S. M. Common median referencing for improved action potential detection with multielectrode arrays. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009, 1604–1607 (2009).

  31. Dhawale, A. K. et al. Automated long-term recording and analysis of neural activity in behaving animals. eLife 6, e27702 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Combrisson, E. et al. Visbrain: a multi-purpose GPU-accelerated open-source suite for multimodal brain data visualization. Front. Neuroinform. 13, 14 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathis, A. et al. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1281–1289 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stringer, C. et al. Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brainwide activity. Science 364, 255 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Karlsson and M. Borius for input about neural recording electronics, C. Kemere for input about motion decoding, V. Yip for assistance with devices fabrication and assembly and A. Li for assistance with tests of the decoding model. This work was funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grants R01NS102917 (to C.X.), U01NS115588 (to C.X. and L.F.), R01NS109361(to L.L.) and UF1 NS107667 (to L.F); the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute grant K25HL140153 (to L.L.); the Welch Foundation Research grant #F-1941-20170325 (to C.X.); and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (to L.F.)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.X. conceived and organized the overall study; Z.Z., H.Z., X.L., L.L. and C.X. designed the experiments, with inputs from all authors; Z.Z. and X.L. designed and fabricated the NET devices, with supervision from C.X.; D.F.L., J.E.C. and L.F., in collaboration with SpikeGadgets LLC, designed the stacking head-mount recording system; Z.Z. and X.L. designed the NET-probe integration with the head-mount recording system, with help from J.E.C. and D.F.L., and supervision from C.X. and L.F.; Z.Z. and X.L. developed and performed surgical procedures, supervised by C.X.; Z.Z., X.L. and H.Z. performed animal neural-recording experiments, with help from L.S. and F.H., and supervision from C.X. and L.L.; H.Z. and Z.Z. developed and implemented data pre-processing, supervised by C.X. and with input from J.E.C. and L.F.; Z.Z. and H.Z. performed data post-analysis, supervised by L.L. and C.X. and with input from L.F.; Z.Z. performed histology, supervised by C.X.; Z.Z., L.L. and C.X. wrote and revised the manuscript, with input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lan Luan or Chong Xie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

C.X., L.L. and Z.Z. are co-inventors on a patent filed by The University of Texas (WO2019051163A1, 14 March 2019) on the ultraflexible neural electrode technology described in this study. L. F., L.L. and C.X. hold equity ownership in Neuralthread Inc., an entity that is licensing this technology. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biomedical Engineering thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Immunohistochemistry analysis showing the tissue-NET interface at a high implantation density.

One mouse was implanted in visual cortex with 10 type-I NET modules, at inter-shank spacings of 150 µm and inter-module spacings of 250 µm. Fluorescent (a) and brightfield (b) microscopy show no observable scarring in the implanted regions. Neuron: red; NETs: yellow. (c), We counted numbers of neurons in seven randomly-chosen 200-µm-diameter regions centering around NETs (yellow circled regions as an example) and five 200-µm-diameter randomly-chosen regions away from NETs (cyan circled regions as an example). We found no significant difference between the two groups using unpaired T test, p = 0.275 (d), suggesting no significant neuronal loss induced by dense NET implants. These results are consistent with our prior studies using single or few NETs (10, 13). Scalebars: 250 µm (a and b) and 50 µm (c).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Example recording performances of type-II (A) and –III (B) NET electrode designs.

These two designs offer high electrode density that allows for the recording of individual neurons by multiple channels and therefore perform better in single unit isolation. Color code corresponds to the location of the recording sites. Each dashed box outlines the waveforms of a single unit recorded on the corresponding sites. Scale bars: 100 μV (vertical) and 2 ms (horizontal).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Modular recording system interfacing with NETs.

(a), A ready-to-implant 128-channel NET module connected to a flexible printed circuit (FPC). Left panel shows the NET module and ball grid array (BGA) through which the connection to FPC was made. Right panel shows that individual NET shanks was attached to tungsten microwires for implantation. (b), Photo of a 128-channal stackable headstage connected to NET through an FPC. (c), Photo of a 1024-channel system composed of eight stackable modules. (d), Photo of a free-moving rat carrying a 1024-channel NET array and stackable headstages as shown in c. 3D printed case enclosed all headstages.

Supplementary information

Main Supplementary Information

Supplementary figures, tables and video captions.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Ultraflexibility of the NET arrays.

Supplementary Video 2

Micro-CT scan of a densely implanted NET array.

Supplementary Video 3

Example of 3D reconstruction of local field potentials recorded by a 1,024-channel NET array.

Supplementary Video 4

Example of spiking activity recorded in visual regions responding to drifting grating stimuli.

Supplementary Video 5

Example of spiking activity recorded by a NET array in visual, sensory and motor cortical regions.

Supplementary Video 6

Example of local field potentials recorded in visual, sensory and motor cortical regions by a NET array.

Supplementary Video 7

Animal facial-motion decoding by large-scale neural recordings.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Z., Zhu, H., Li, X. et al. Ultraflexible electrode arrays for months-long high-density electrophysiological mapping of thousands of neurons in rodents. Nat. Biomed. Eng 7, 520–532 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00941-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00941-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing