Introduction

Organic–inorganic halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have emerged as the most promising third-generation photovoltaic technology due to their high efficiency and low-cost solution-processed device fabrication1,2. Currently, the highest certified power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs has achieved 25.7%, which is comparable with that of silicon solar cells3. Recently, flexible PSCs have gained increasing attention due to their light weight, portability, and adaptability for building-integrated photovoltaics4,5. However, the efficiency and stability of flexible PSCs still lag behind those of rigid PSCs due to low crystallization of perovskite films with more defect sites on flexible substrates6. Moreover, the mechanical stability of flexible PSCs is not good enough due to the brittle nature of perovskite film7.

Many efforts have been made to enhance the performance of flexible PSCs. Combining 2D perovskite and 3D perovskite to construct 2D/3D heterostructure can enhance the mechanical durability of flexible PSCs8. However, the introduction of organic spacer molecules may exert a negative influence on charge transport. The incorporation of polymer additives can significantly enhance the mechanical stability of flexible PSCs. For example, Gao and co-workers introduced β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) and adamantane (AA) as a self-healing system into flexible PSCs, which significantly enhanced the mechanical stability9.

Alloying Sn and Pb to get Sn–Pb mixed perovskite is an effective method to tune the bandgap of perovskite, which can be a promising way to achieve the highest PCE of single-junction PSCs predicted by the Shockler–Queisser limit10,11. However, little efforts have been focused on flexible Sn–Pb-mixed PSCs.

In this work, we introduce N,N-dimethyl acrylamide (DMAA) as an additive into Sn–Pb-mixed perovskite film. DMAA can form strong interaction with the precursor solution, leading to enhanced crystallization and reduced defects. Meantime, the cross-linkable DMAA formed by in situ polymerization during thermal annealing can anchor at grain boundaries as flexible scaffolds, which is beneficial for enhanced mechanical stability of the perovskite film. Consequently, the PSCs showed PCEs of 16.44% and 15.44% on rigid and flexible substrates, respectively. Meanwhile, the flexible PSCs demonstrated excellent mechanical stability, which remained over 80% of the original efficiency after 5000 bending cycles at a radius of 5 mm.

Results and discussion

Interactions between perovskite film and DMAA

The Sn–Pb mixed perovskite film with a composition of FA0.7MA0.3Sn0.5Pb0.5I3 was prepared by one-step antisolvent method with DMAA as additive. The morphology of the perovskite films with and without DMAA additive was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). As shown in Fig. 1a, b, there is no obvious change in the grain size. Remarkably, the root-mean-square (Rq) of the perovskite film decreased from 34.8 to 16.9 nm after the DMAA modification (Fig. 1d, e). Meantime, the cross-sectional SEM images show that the DMAA-modified perovskite film has fewer grain boundaries (Supplementary Fig. 1). We propose that DMAA can coordinate with perovskite precursor to regulate the film crystallization for retarded crystal growth of Sn-containing perovskite, leading to the formation of smooth perovskite film12. Then, X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted to examine the phase of the perovskite films. As can be seen from Fig. 1c, the characteristic peaks at about 14° and 28° correspond to the (110) and (220) planes of mixed Sn–Pb perovskite13, implying that DMAA is not incorporated into the perovskite crystal structure. Moreover, the perovskite film with DMAA shows stronger diffraction intensity and reduced full width at half maximum (FWHM) value, indicating enhanced perovskite crystallization. Figure 1f shows the UV–vis absorption of the perovskite films, and the DMAA-modified perovskite film demonstrated slightly enhanced optical absorption.

Fig. 1: Morphology, structure, and optical properties of perovskite films.
figure 1

SEM images of perovskite films (a) without and (b) with DMAA, and the scale bar is 100 nm. c XRD patterns of perovskite films. AFM images of perovskite films (d) without and (e) with DMAA. f UV–vis absorption spectra of perovskite films.

DMAA contains C = C bonds, which favors in situ cross-linked polymerization during thermal annealing of perovskite14. Meantime, the C = O bonds can form interaction with uncoordinated ions in perovskite films (Fig. 2a). The photographs of DMAA before and after cross-linking polymerization are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2, which changed from liquid to transparent solid after thermal annealing, validating the cross-linking polymerization15. To study the interaction between DMAA and perovskite, Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) are taken. As shown in Fig. 2b, the C = O peak shifts to lower wavelength, which is resulted from the coordination of C = O and Sn2+16. Meanwhile, the C = C peak disappeared after thermal annealing, which indicated the cross-linking polymerization17. To further investigate the interaction between DMAA and perovskite, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted and shown in Supplementary Fig. 3 and Fig. 2c–e. Due to the electron-donating nature of the C = O group, the peaks of Pb, Sn, and I shift to lower binding energies after the incorporation of DMAA, indicating the interaction between DMAA and perovskite18,19. Meanwhile, the Sn 3d spectra of the films were deconvoluted into two peaks corresponding to Sn2+ and Sn4+, respectively (Fig. 2f, g). The DMAA-modified perovskite film shows lower Sn4+ peak than that of the control film, indicating the introduction of DMAA can effectively suppress the oxidation of Sn2+, which is beneficial for enhanced photovoltaic performance20. The mitigation of Sn2+ oxidation induced by DMAA can be attributed to the smooth perovskite film and the coordination between DMAA and Sn2+, which synergistically inhibit oxygen ingressing into the film and improve the oxidation resistance of the film21.

Fig. 2: Interactions between perovskite and DMAA.
figure 2

a Schematic illustration of the interaction between DMAA and perovskite. b FTIR spectra of DMAA, SnF2 and DMAA-SnF2 after thermal annealing. XPS spectra of (c) Pb 4 f, (d) I 3d, and (e) Sn 3d for the perovskite films. XPS spectra of perovskite film without (f) and with (g) DMAA.

Photovoltaic performance of Sn–Pb mixed PSCs

PSCs with a structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag were fabricated to investigate the effect of DMAA on photovoltaic performance (Fig. 3a). The optimal amount of DMAA in the precursor was obtained by careful optimization, and the photovoltaic parameters of devices with different contents of DMAA are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. The current density-voltage (J–V) curves of the champion device with and without DMAA are shown in Fig. 3b. The control device showed short-circuit current (JSC) of 27.36 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.73 V, fill factor (FF) of 74.94, and a PCE of 15.03%. The device modified with DMAA showed enhanced performance with JSC of 27.79 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.78 V, and FF of 75.05, yielding a PCE of 16.44%. Importantly, much reduced hysteresis was observed in the DMAA-modified device, which can be ascribed to the enhanced perovskite film quality22. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra of the devices are shown in Supplementary Fig. 5, and the integrated JSC are in line with the results from the J–V curves. Meantime, the DMAA-modified unencapsulated devices showed excellent long-term stability, which remained more than 90% of the initial efficiency after 1000 h storage in N2 glovebox (Supplementary Fig. 6). On the other hand, the control device degraded quickly and maintained only 40% of the original efficiency after 500 h. Then, flexible PSCs are prepared and the DMAA-modified devices achieved a PCE of 15.44%, while the control device showed a lower PCE of 14.22% (Fig. 3c). The corresponding statistic photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Supplementary Fig. 7. The bending stability of the devices was evaluated with a curvature radius of 5 mm. As demonstrated in Fig. 3d, the PSCs with DMAA maintained over 80% of the initial efficiency after 5000 bending cycles, while the PCE of the control device gradually decreased to 35% under the same condition. The cross-linking DMAA located at grain boundaries can protect the perovskite films, leading to the enhanced mechanical stability of the devices.

Fig. 3: Photovoltaic performance of Sn–Pb mixed PSCs.
figure 3

a Device structure of the Sn–Pb mixed PSCs. J–V curves of the Sn–Pb mixed PSCs on (b) rigid and (c) flexible substrates, the inset of (c) shows the picture of a flexible PSC. d Bending tests of flexible PSCs with a bending radius of 5 mm.

Charge-carrier dynamics

To analyze the carrier kinetics of the perovskite films, steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy was taken. As seen in Fig. 4a, the PL intensity of the film with DMAA is higher than that of the control film, indicating improved film quality with reduced non-radiative recombination. Figure 4b shows the dark J–V curve of the devices, and DMAA-modified device has a much lower dark current density than that of the control, indicating that the introduction of DMAA can effectively reduce the leakage current23. To quantitatively estimate the defects of the perovskite films, the space-charge-limited-current (SCLC) was measured and shown in Fig. 4c. Hole-only devices with the structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/Au were prepared, and trap density (Nt) can be calculated from Nt = 2εε0VTFL/qL2, where q is the elementary charge, L is the thickness of the perovskite layer, ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, ε is the dielectric constant of the perovskite film, and VTFL is the trap filling limit voltage24,25. With the DMAA additive, the calculated trap density decreased from 4.34 × 1014 cm−3 to 3.87 × 1014 cm−3, which confirms the defect passivation effect of DMAA. Then, electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was measured to understand the charge transfer process of the PSCs26. The Nyquist plots of devices can be fitted using the equivalent circuit such as the inset in Fig. 4d and the low-frequency arcs of the diagram represent charge recombination resistance27. As shown in Fig. 4d, the device with DMAA shows larger charge recombination resistance, which indicates the DMAA additive can inhibit charge recombination.

Fig. 4: Charge-carrier dynamics.
figure 4

a Steady-state PL spectra of perovskite films. b Dark J–V curves of the PSCs. c I–V curves of the hole-only devices. d Nyquist plots of the PSCs and the inset shows the equivalent circuit diagram used for calculation.

In summary, we incorporated DMAA into perovskite film to in situ form cross-linking scaffolds for flexible Sn–Pb mixed PSCs. The DMAA can interact with perovskite precursor to regulate the crystallization process, leading to enhanced crystallinity and reduced defects. In addition, the polymer can chemically anchor at grain boundaries, which can greatly improve the mechanical stability of the devices. Sn–Pb mixed PSCs achieved PCEs of 16.44% and 15.44% on rigid and flexible substrates, respectively. More importantly, the flexible PSCs demonstrated excellent bending stability, which retained over 80% of the initial performance after 5000 bending cycles at a radius of 5 mm. This work provides a promising method for achieving high-performance flexible devices for portable and wearable applications.

Methods

Materials

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS, Clevios PVP AI 4083) was purchased from Heraeus. N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), chlorobenzene (CB), tin (II) iodide (SnI2), lead iodide (PbI2), tin (II) fluoride (SnF2), formamidine iodide (FAI), methylammonium iodide (MAI), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Bathocuproine (BCP) was purchased from TCI.

Device fabrication

ITO-coated substrates were cleaned by ultra-sonication in deionized water, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol for 10 min, respectively. PEDOT:PSS was spin-coated onto ITO substrates at 4000 rpm for 30 s and annealed at 150 °C for 30 min. Then, the substrates were transferred to a nitrogen glovebox. The 1.45 M FA0.7MA0.3Sn0.5Pb0.5I3 perovskite precursor solution was prepared in mixed solvents of DMF and DMSO with a volume of 4:1. In total, 10 mol% SnF2 relative to SnI2 was added in the precursor solution. In terms of DMAA additive, the molar ratio of DMAA and SnI2 was 3%, 5%, 10%, and 20%, and the DMAA additive was directly added to the precursor solution. The mixed perovskite solution was spin-coated on PEDOT:PSS layer at 4000 rpm for 30 s, and CB was poured on the film at 10th s, followed by annealing at 100 °C for 10 min. PCBM (20 mg ml−1 in CB) and BCP (0.5 mg ml−1 in IPA) were spin-coated on the perovskite film at 2000 rpm for 30 s and 5000 rpm for 30 s, respectively. Finally, 100 nm Ag was evaporated by thermal evaporation under high vacuum to fabricate PSCs with 0.1-cm2 active areas.

Characterization

SEM was performed by JSM-7800F (JEOL, Japan) with a field-emission gun electron source. The perovskite films were first covered with a thin layer of gold before the SEM measurement. The ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectra were performed on UV-1750 (Shimadzu, Japan). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was performed on Scientific Nicolet iS50 (Thermo, America) with ATR Unit. EIS measurement was recorded on CHI760E electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments Ins, USA). J−V curves were measured by using a Class 3A solar simulator (XES-40S3, SAN-EI) under AM 1.5 G standard light equipped with a Keithley 2400 source meter. A shadow mask was used to define the effective aperture area of the device to 0.09 cm2. The scanning rate was 100 mV s−1 with a voltage step of 10 mV, using both reverse (from VOC to JSC) and forward (from JSC to VOC) scans. XPS was performed on PHI 5000 VersaProbe III (Ulvac-Phi, Japan) using Al Kα radiation. PL was performed on FLS980 spectrometer by Edinburgh Instruments using a pulsed excitation source at 520 nm with a repetition rate of 1 MHz.