Introduction

In condensed matter physics, an effective axion field can be derived from the (4+1)-dimensional Chern-Simons theory of topological insulators (TIs)1,2, described by an axion action \({S}_{\theta }=\frac{\theta }{2\pi }\frac{{e}^{2}}{h}\int {{\rm{d}}}^{3}x{\rm{d}}t{\bf{E}}\cdot {\bf{B}}\), in which E and B are the electromagnetic fields inside the insulators, e is the charge of an electron, h is Planck’s constant, θ is the dimensionless pseudoscalar parameter as the axion field3. The axion field θ is odd under the time reversal symmetry \({\mathcal{T}}\) or spatial inversion symmetry \({\mathcal{P}}\), so it is quantized to π (mod 2π) for TIs and 0 (mod 2π) for normal insulators (NIs) if \({\mathcal{T}}\) or \({\mathcal{P}}\) is preserved. Such a quantized θ can lead to the image magnetic monopole effect4, the quantized magneto-optical Faraday/Kerr effect5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, the topological magnetoelectric effect (TME)2,13,14,15,16,17,18 and the half-integer quantum Hall effect on the \({\mathcal{T}}\)-breaking surface of TIs2. Recently, the axion field in condensed matters was studied in magnetic topological insulators19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, topological-material heterostructures28[,29, and charge-density-wave Weyl semimetals30,31. An overall review of the axion physics in condensed matters can be found in refs. 32,33.

In antiferromagnetic (AFM) insulators, the axion field θ can be an unquantized value, once both \({\mathcal{T}}\) and \({\mathcal{P}}\) are broken. The spin-wave excitations can induce fluctuations of the axion field34,35,36, called as the dynamical axion field (DAF) θ(r, t) which has spatial and temporal dependence. θ(r, t) can lead to rich dynamical magnetoelectric (ME) effects, for example, the dynamical chiral magnetic effect37,38,39,40, anomalous Hall effect37, axionic polariton34,41 and unconventional electromagnetic effects42,43,44. In principle, generic AFM insulators may exhibit the DAFs, such as Cr2O315,45,46, but the DAFs turn out to be too weak to be detected36. Large DAF requires the topologically nontrivial AFM insulators described by nonzero spin Chern numbers47. Recently, layered material Mn2Bi2Te5 and the superlattice (MnBi2Te4)2(Bi2Te3) were predicted to host large DAFs36,47, denoted as DAF insulators. However, the experimental synthesis of them has not been reported. Therefore, the challenge is to discover realistic DAF insulators.

Recently, bulk MnBi2Te4 was discovered to be an AFM TI and it hosts a quantized axion field θ = π protected by the inversion symmetry \({\mathcal{P}}\) and the magnetic-crystalline symmetry \({\mathcal{S}}={\mathcal{T}}{\tau }_{1/2}\), where τ1/2 is the half-translation operator22,23,25,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62. Interestingly, both \({\mathcal{P}}\) and \({\mathcal{S}}\) are spontaneously broken in MnBi2Te4 films with even septuple layers (SLs). In this article, our results indicate that the fluctuations of AFM order can lead to substantially enhanced dynamical ME effects in MnBi2Te4 thin films, induced by the \({\mathcal{P}}\) and \({\mathcal{S}}\) breaking.

As shown in Fig. 1a, the AFM TI MnBi2Te422 consists of SLs coupled to each other by a Van der Waals-type interaction. It features an A-type AFM magnetic ground state with the out-of-plane easy axis. Although the magnetic order explicitly breaks the \({\mathcal{T}}\), the bulk MnBi2Te4 possesses the \({\mathcal{S}}\), marked in Fig. 1a. In addition, the \({\mathcal{P}}\) is preserved for the bulk MnBi2Te4 with the inversion center at the Mn layer in the middle of each SL. Interestingly, both the \({\mathcal{S}}\) and \({\mathcal{P}}\) are explicitly broken in even-SL MnBi2Te4 thin films due to the finite size, schematically shown in Fig. 1b. As a result, the restriction for the quantization of the axion field θ is removed, which will lead to a tunable dynamical ME effect.

Fig. 1: Schematic of \({\mathcal{P}}\), \({\mathcal{S}}\)-breaking mass in MnBi2Te4 thin films.
figure 1

a Crystal structure of MnBi2Te4. The red arrows denote the spin moment of Mn atoms and the green arrows represent the half-translation operator τ1/2 for the \({\mathcal{S}}\) symmetry. b Schematic of MnBi2Te4 thin films with even septuple layers grown along the easy axis (the z-direction). c Schematic of the \({\mathcal{P}}\), \({\mathcal{S}}\)-breaking mass m5 in MnBi2Te4 thin films. m5 expects to increase when the film thickness decreases due to the \({\mathcal{P}}\), \({\mathcal{S}}\)-breaking.

Results

Effective model analysis

We start from the low-energy effective Hamiltonian of bulk MnBi2Te4. Taking the relevant symmetries \({\mathcal{S}}\), \({\mathcal{P}}\) and \({{\mathcal{C}}}_{3z}\) into account, the four-band kp model up to the third order of k can be obtained as22 H = H0 + H3, where

$${H}_{0}=\epsilon ({\bf{k}}){{{\Gamma }}}_{0}+\mathop{\sum }\limits_{i=1}^{5}{d}_{i}({\bf{k}}){{{\Gamma }}}^{i},$$
(1)

with \({d}_{i}({\bf{k}})=\left(\right.{A}_{2}{k}_{y},-{A}_{2}{k}_{x},{A}_{1}{k}_{z},M({\bf{k}}),0\left)\right.\), \(\epsilon ({\bf{k}})={C}_{0}+{D}_{1}{k}_{z}^{2}+{D}_{2}({k}_{x}^{2}+{k}_{y}^{2})\), and \(M({\bf{k}})={m}_{4}+{B}_{1}{k}_{z}^{2}+{B}_{2}({k}_{x}^{2}+{k}_{y}^{2})\). Here, m4 is the mass term with m4 < 0 (m4 > 0) depicting the inverted (normal) band structure. The Dirac matrices are given by Γ0,1,...,5 = (τ0σ0, τxσx, τxσy, τyσ0, τzσ0, τxσz), where τx,y,z and σx,y,z denote the Pauli matrices for the orbital and spin, respectively. The third order term H3 is given explicitly by

$${H}_{3}={R}_{1}\left({k}_{x}^{3}-3{k}_{x}{k}_{y}^{2}\right){{{\Gamma }}}_{5}+{R}_{2}\left(3{k}_{x}^{2}{k}_{y}-{k}_{y}^{3}\right){{{\Gamma }}}_{3}.$$
(2)

The detailed parameters can be obtained by fitting with first-principles band structure and have already been provided in ref. 22.

For MnBi2Te4 thin films, both \({\mathcal{S}}\) and \({\mathcal{P}}\) are broken, but the combined symmetry \({\mathcal{PT}}\) is preserved. Based on the symmetry analysis, a mass term m5Γ5 to the leading order adds to the effective Hamiltonian of MnBi2Te4 thin films and significantly changes the axion field θ from the quantized value (π). Actually, the mass term m5Γ5 indicates an effective staggered Zeeman field generated by the AFM order34. Due to the finite-size effect, it expects to decrease with increasing thickness of the films, and finally vanishes for the bulk limit, as illustrated in Fig. 1c. This is in contrast to the three-dimensional (3D) DAF insulator34,36,47 with a non-vanishing m5 in the bulk limit. Based on the effective Hamiltonian, the energy gap at the Γ point of MnBi2Te4 thin films is found to be \({E}_{\text{gap}}=2\sqrt{{m}_{4}^{2}+{m}_{5}^{2}}\). When the strength of spin-orbit coupling (SOC) λ is tuned from zero to the realistic value λ0, the band inversion is induced along with the mass term m4 changing from m4 > 0 to m4 < 0, and the energy gap reaches the minimum Egap = 2m5 when the band inversion happens (m4 = 0). Based on this picture, we can quantitatively characterize the mass m5 for MnBi2Te4 thin films.

As an example, the first-principles band structures of 12-SL MnBi2Te4 with different SOC are calculated, shown in Fig. 2a. The SOC dependence of Egap is further extracted and shown in Fig. 2b. When SOC is weak, the band structures indicate an energy gap Egap without a band inversion. As expected, when increasing SOC, Egap decreases to a minimum around SOC (λ ~ 0.9λ0) without gap closing, and then increases with a band inversion. In Fig. 2c, it explicitly shows the mass m5 as a function of the thickness of N bi-SL MnBi2Te4 thin films (red line), which indeed gradually decreases with increasing N. For comparison, we also present the result of m5 for Mn2Bi2Te5 thin films (blue line). It is obvious that for large N towards the bulk limit, m5 approaches zero (a finite value) for MnBi2Te4 (Mn2Bi2Te5), as expected. Note that m5 of MnBi2Te4 films is tunable to zero within a larger range than that of Mn2Bi2Te5 films, as shown in Fig. 2c. Furthermore, it is numerically found that m5 exhibits an approximately linear behavior against 1/N, namely, the inverse of the thickness for both MnBi2Te4 and Mn2Bi2Te5 films, as shown in Fig. 2d.

Fig. 2: Finite-size effect of MnBi2Te4 thin films.
figure 2

a The evolution of the band structure of the 12-SL MnBi2Te4 thin film as a function of the strength of the SOC λ/λ0. b The evolution of the energy gap with the SOC strength. The energy gap first goes smaller and then goes larger without exactly closing. It is clear to see a minimum energy gap when increasing the SOC, which corresponds to 2m5 (the \({\mathcal{P}}\), \({\mathcal{S}}\)-breaking mass). c,d The mass m5 versus the thickness of MnBi2Te4 (red) and Mn2Bi2Te5 (blue) thin films. N presents the number of bi-SLs of MnBi2Te4 films or (nonuple layers)NLs of Mn2Bi2Te5 films.

Dynamical magnetoelectric effect

The application of an electric field can induce a magnetization, and reversely, the application of a magnetic field can lead to a polarization, which is the typical ME effect. In 3D TIs, such as Bi2Se363, the ME response is isotropic, which can be described by the effective axion action Sθ with the quantized axion field θ = π, protected by the time reversal symmetry \({\mathcal{T}}\). In AFM TI MnBi2Te4, both \({\mathcal{P}}\) and \({\mathcal{S}}\) constrain the axion field θ to the quantized value of π. However, for even-SL MnBi2Te4 thin films, all \({\mathcal{P}}\), \({\mathcal{T}}\) and \({\mathcal{S}}\) symmetries are broken and the mass m5 is induced, thus rendering an unquantized θ. It should be pointed out that due to the finite-size effect in MnBi2Te4 thin films, the ME response is generically anisotropic64. Moreover, since m5 is related to the inherently fluctuating AFM order, the axion field will be time dependent ∂tθ(t) ≠ 0, leading to the dynamical ME effect. In the following, we will show that the dynamical ME effect can be realized and substantially tuned by adjusting the film thickness, temperature or element substitutions.

Here, we consider applying a magnetic field B in the plane of MnBi2Te4 thin films (e.g. the x-axis in Fig. 1a), which will induce a charge polarization P in the same direction. To describe such a ME response, we need to calculate the ME coefficient α defined as P = − αB and it can be obtained from the quantity \(\gamma \equiv (1/d)\mathop{\int}\nolimits_{-d/2}^{d/2}{\rm{d}}z\eta (z)\) through α = γ(e2/2h)17,64. Here, η(z) is a dimensionless function defined as

$$\eta (z)=2\mathop{\int }\limits_{-d/2}^{d/2}{\rm{d}}z^{\prime} z^{\prime} {{{\Pi }}}_{xy}(z,z^{\prime} ),$$
(3)

where the current correlation function \({{{\Pi }}}_{xy}(z,z^{\prime} )\) is given by the Kubo formula,

$$\begin{array}{lll}{{{\Pi }}}_{xy}(z,z^{\prime} )&=&\frac{{\hslash }^{2}}{2\pi e}\int {d}^{2}{\bf{k}}\mathop{\sum}\limits_{n\ne m}f({\epsilon }_{n{\bf{k}}})\\ &&\times 2{\rm{Im}}\left[\frac{\left\langle n{\bf{k}}\right|{j}_{x}({\bf{k}},z)\left|m{\bf{k}}\right\rangle \left\langle m{\bf{k}}\right|{j}_{y}({\bf{k}},z^{\prime} )\left|n{\bf{k}}\right\rangle }{{({\epsilon }_{n{\bf{k}}}-{\epsilon }_{m{\bf{k}}})}^{2}}\right].\end{array}$$
(4)

Here, \(\left|n{\bf{k}}\right\rangle\) is the normalized Bloch wavefunction of the n-th electron subband, and j(k, z) = (e/)∂kH(k, z) represents the x-y plane current density operator, where H(k, z) is obtained by discretizing the system into a tight-binding model along the z-direction and fixing the periodic boundary condition in the x-y plane to preserve kx and ky as good quantum numbers.

In the bulk limit, the quantity γ is related to the axion field by γ = θ/π. Considering the inherent AFM fluctuations with δm5, θ can be divided into a static part θ0 and a dynamical part δθ(t). Similarly, γ is also comprised of a static part γ0 and a dynamical part δγ(t) given by δγ = δm5/g with the coefficient 1/g = ∂γ/∂m5 to the linear order of δm5. We can see that 1/g is a key quantity for a large dynamical ME effect under AFM fluctuations δm5.

In Fig. 3a, we present the quantity γ0 as a function of the thickness of N bi-SLs MnBi2Te4 thin films (red line) and we take Mn2Bi2Te5 films (yellow line) for comparison. It can be seen that with increasing N, γ0 gradually increases and approaches 1 at the bulk limit with N →  for MnBi2Te4 while it approaches a finite value ( < 1) for Mn2Bi2Te5 films at the bulk limit. The dependence of γ0 on the mass term m5 for MnBi2Te4 films with different thicknesses (N = 4, 6, 8, 16) are shown in Fig. 3b. When N is large, γ0 quickly increases when m5 is small. With increasing m5, γ0 exhibits a linear decrease for all films, which indicates a large m5 tends to suppress γ0. Based on the dependence of γ0 on m5, the dependence of the the quantity 1/g on m5 can be further obtained, shown in Fig. 3d. The generic feature is that 1/g increases with decreasing m5, and approaches the maximum value when m5 → 0. It is notable that there is a broad range of m5 to a large 1/g for thin films (e.g. N = 4, 6, 8), while that range of m5 is extremely reduced for thick films (e.g. N = 16). We then investigate the tunability of 1/g from the film thickness, temperature and element substitutions.

Fig. 3: Dynamical magnetoelectic effect.
figure 3

a, c The ME quantity γ0 (a) and 1/g (c) versus the thickness with N bi-SLs for MnBi2Te4 (red) and NLs Mn2Bi2Te5 (yellow) thin films, where values of m5 are obtained from first-principles calculations. b, d γ0 (b) and 1/g (d) as a function of m5 for films with different thickness (N = 4, 6, 8, 16). The shaded regions in (d) denote the substantially tunable range 1/g of realistic MnBi2Te4 thin films by decreasing m5 with increasing temperatures up to the Néel temperature. e, f γ0 (e) and 1/g (f) as a function of the thickness (N bi-SLs) of films for three representative values of the mass term m4, where negative (positive) m4 represents topologically nontrivial (trivial) band structure with (without) the band inversion. The mass term m4 can be tuned through the element substitution of Mn(Bi1−xSbx)2(Te1−ySey)4.

We first inspect the finite-size effect. Based on first-principles calculations of m5 presented in Fig. 2c, the dependence of 1/g on varying N is shown in Fig. 3c. We can see that 1/g is large for the ultrathin limit, and quickly decreases with increasing the film thickness (N), and then crosses zero from positive to negative, and gradually saturates. Secondly, we discuss the temperature effect. M = 1/2(〈SiA〉 − 〈SiB〉) is taken as the AFM order parameter, where i denotes the unit cell and A/B denotes the magnetic sites. The AFM order is in the \(\hat{z}\) direction (\({{\bf{M}}}^{-}={M}^{-}\hat{z}\)) for MnBi2Te4 films and it leads to \({m}_{5}\propto {M}_{z}^{-}\)34. With increasing the temperature from zero to the Néel temperature, \({M}_{z}^{-}\) inevitably decreases from the maximum value to zero. Consequently, for MnBi2Te4 thin films, the m5 can be continuously tuned by the temperature, from the maximum value at zero temperature to zero near the Néel temperature TN. Therefore, a tunable range of substantially enhanced 1/g is obtained through adjusting the temperature from zero to TN (see the shaded regions). According to Fig. 3a, d, the ultrathin films (e.g. N = 4) have a broad tunable range of m5 to large 1/g, but a small static γ0. The bulk limit films have a tiny range of m5 to large 1/g (e.g. N = 16). Most interestingly, the proper thin films (e.g. N = 6, 8) have both a broad tunable range of m5 to large 1/g and a large static γ0, which should be a promising choice for experiments.

At last, we investigate the effect of element substitutions. The mass term m4, with m4 < 0 (m4 > 0) indicates a topologically nontrivial (trivial) electronic structure. Interestingly, m4 can be experimentally tuned through element substitutions in Mn(Bi1−xSbx)2(Te1−ySey)4 materials. Here, we choose three representative m4, namely, two in the band-inverted nontrivial regime [m4 = − 116.7 meV (red lines) is taken from ref. 22 and m4 = − 50 meV (blue lines) presents a moderate band inversion], and one in the trivial regime [m4 = 50 meV (yellow lines)], to show γ0 and 1/g for different thick films in Fig. 3e, f. In the topologically trivial case, γ0 ~ 0. In the topologically nontrivial case, it can be seen that a larger m4 exhibits a larger γ0, which approaches 1 for N → . According to Fig. 3f, 1/g in the topologically trivial case is obviously negligible compared to that in the topologically nontrivial case. As for the nontrivial case, overall speaking, a weaker band inversion with smaller m4 (m4 < 0) leads to a larger magnitude of 1/g, shown in Fig. 3f. Notably, the band-inversion magnitude could be modified by the finite-size effect65, as reflected by the non-monotonic behavior (blue line) of 1/g on N in Fig. 3f.

Experimental detection

Many interesting experimental designs of axion electrodynamics have been proposed, including the instability in an external electric field42, the recent proposal of unconventional level attraction in cavity axion polariton41 and the proposal to detect dark matter axions66, but the experimental progress is quite slow due to the lack of realistic DAF materials. The tunable dynamical ME effect in MnBi2Te4 thin films expects to be used for these proposals. Here, we quantitatively estimate that it is experimentally accessible to detect the dynamical ME effect in MnBi2Te4 thin films through the current transport techniques. The basic idea is to measure the in-plane response current induced by the chiral magnetic effect, given by \({j}_{\text{CME}}=-\frac{{e}^{2}}{2h}\frac{\partial \delta \gamma }{\partial t}B\), where B is the uniform inplane magnetic field. Since the dynamical ME coefficient δγ is proportional to the change of the AFM order δm5, a time-varying δγ can be driven by AFM resonance37, in the presence of both a uniform magnetic field along the out-of-plane (z) direction and a microwave magnetic field along the in-plane direction. Therefore, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 4, we apply a tilted static magnetic field B, with components Bx and Bz along x and z directions, respectively, and a microwave magnetic field Bω with a frequency of ω along the inplane direction. Taking \(\delta \gamma (t)\approx \delta {m}_{5}^{0}\sin (\omega t)/g\), where \(\delta {m}_{5}^{0}\) is the amplitude of the driven AFM fluctuation, the response current can be obtained as

$${j}_{\text{CME}}=-\frac{{e}^{2}}{2h}\frac{\delta {m}_{5}^{0}\omega {B}_{x}}{g}\cos (\omega t).$$
(5)

Note that since 1/g can be tuned by the film thickness, temperature, and element substitutions, the magnitude of jCME can thus be tunable. As a concrete example, we choose N = 6 bi-SL MnBi2Te4 thin film with γ0 = 0.6, m5 = 3 meV, and 1/g = 0.1 meV−1. The other parameters are chosen typically as Bx = 0.1 T, ω/2π = 20 GHz, and \(\delta {m}_{5}^{0}=0.5\) meV. Finally, the amplitude of jCME is approximated as 1.2Acm−2, which can be further much enhanced through tuning 1/g (see the shade region in Fig. 3d), therefore it is accessible by current transport experimental techniques.

Fig. 4: Experimental setup for detecting the tunable dynamical ME effect.
figure 4

A tilted static magnetic is applied with components along both x and z directions. A microwave magnetic field with a frequency of ω is applied along the in-plane x-direction to drive the AFM resonance. The chiral magnetic effect due to the time-varying dynamical ME coefficient will lead to a measurable inplane response current.

Discussion

To summarize, our work presents that AFM TI films MnBi2Te4 family, which have been successfully synthesized and well studied, provide a promising material platform to realize the dynamical ME effects. More interestingly, the dynamical ME effect is tunable and even substantially enhanced through engineering the thickness of films, temperature or element substitutions. It expects to be experimentally detectable and should be used to realize those exotic axion electrodynamics previously proposed.

Methods

Computational details

We performed the first-principles calculations for bulk MnBi2Te4 and Mn2Bi2Te5 with different SOC through employing the Vienna ab-initio simulation package(VASP)67,68 and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof(PBE)69,70 type exchange-correlation potential was adopted, with the energy cutoff fixed to 420 eV. By considering the transition metal Mn, GGA+U functional with U = 3 eV for Mn d orbitals for all the results in this work. The k-point sampling grid of Brillouin zone in the self-consistent process was a Γ-centered Monkhorst–Pack k-point mesh of 8 × 8 × 4 for the bulk systems, and a total energy tolerance 10−7eV was adopted for self-consistent convergence. For MnBi2Te4 and Mn2Bi2Te5 films, we employed the maximally localized Wanneir functions (MLWF) from the first-principles calculations71,72 to construct tight-binding Hamiltonians for different thickness. The Mn − d, Te − p and Bi − p orbitals were initialized for MLWFs by Wannier9073.