Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Radiative properties of quantum emitters in boron nitride from excited state calculations and Bayesian analysis

Abstract

Point defects in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) have attracted growing attention as bright single-photon emitters. However, understanding of their atomic structure and radiative properties remains incomplete. Here we study the excited states and radiative lifetimes of over 20 native defects and carbon or oxygen impurities in hBN using ab initio density functional theory and GW plus Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations, generating a large data set of their emission energy, polarization and lifetime. We find a wide variability across quantum emitters, with exciton energies ranging from 0.3 to 4 eV and radiative lifetimes from ns to ms for different defect structures. Through a Bayesian statistical analysis, we identify various high-likelihood charge-neutral defect emitters, among which the native VNNB defect is predicted to possess emission energy and radiative lifetime in agreement with experiments. Our work advances the microscopic understanding of hBN single-photon emitters and introduces a computational framework to characterize and identify quantum emitters in 2D materials.

Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) materials are rapidly growing as a platform for photon based quantum information technologies1,2. The discovery of single-photon emitters (SPEs) at point defects in hBN3 has spurred an intense search for optically active defects in 2D crystals4. Compared to defects in bulk crystals, such as diamond and silicon carbide5,6,7,8, defects embedded in 2D materials promise to be more easily addressed and controlled. In the case of hBN, defect emitters exhibit a range of desirable properties, including high emission rate, room temperature stability, strong zero-phonon line (ZPL) and easy integration with other optical components using 2D hBN crystals1,9,10,11,12.

A pressing challenge for defect emitters in hBN is identifying their atomic structure. Various possible structures have been proposed on the basis of density functional theory (DFT) calculations and their comparison with experiments3,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. However, while DFT can provide valuable insight into the formation energy, symmetry and electronic structure of SPE defects, it cannot address key aspects of point-defect SPEs such as their excited states and radiative processes responsible for light emission. To complicate the matter further, similar to other 2D materials and their defects20,21,22, optical transitions at defects in hBN are dominated by excitonic effects23, which require specialized first-principles calculations beyond the scope of DFT. Quantum chemistry approaches and density matrix renormalization group have also been used to investigate specific defect structures24,25, but wide comparisons among different structures are still missing.

The Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) can accurately predict optical properties and excitons in materials26. It also enables, due to recent advances, precise calculations of radiative lifetimes in 2D and bulk crystals27,28,29,30. The radiative lifetime plays an important role in the study of SPEs as it determines the shortest decay time constant in the second-order photon correlation function31,32 and can also be measured directly from fluorescence intensity decay3,10. Applying the BSE and related methods to defect emitters in hBN would enable direct comparisons between theory and experiment of the emission energy and radiative lifetime, providing valuable information to identify defect SPEs. Yet, first-principles BSE calculations are computationally costly to carry out on defect structures, and the radiative lifetime calculations are only a recent development.

In this work, we employ the BSE approach to compute from first principles the optical properties, transition dipoles, excitons and radiative lifetimes of atomic defects in hBN. We examine a large pool of candidate SPE structures, spanning native defects and carbon or oxygen impurities, to correlate their atomic structures with their photophysics. We find that different quantum emitters exhibit radiative lifetimes spanning six orders of magnitude and emission energies from infrared to ultraviolet. Bayesian statistical analysis is employed to correlate our results with experiments and identify high-likelihood charge-neutral SPEs in hBN, among which we find the VNNB defect to have the highest likelihood. In-depth calculations on the VNNB defect highlight the strong dependence of its radiative properties on small perturbations to its atomic structure. The dependence of the defect radiative properties on dielectric screening is analyzed by comparing monolayer and bulk hBN results. Our systematic investigation addresses key challenges for characterizing the excited states and radiative properties of defect emitters in 2D materials.

Results

Excited state properties of hBN defect emitters

Our candidate defect structures consist of charge-neutral native defects and carbon or oxygen impurities occupying one or two atomic sites, for a total of 8 different native defects and 7 structures for each of carbon and oxygen impurities. We compute the ground state defect properties using DFT, employing fully relaxed defect atomic structures in 5 × 5 supercells of monolayer hBN (and for some defects, in bulk hBN). We then refine the electronic structure of selected defects using GW calculations33, followed by BSE calculations to obtain the exciton energies and wave functions and from them the optical absorption, transition dipoles and radiative lifetimes (see the “Methods” section). In the following, we denote the defects in hBN as XNYB if neighboring N and B atoms are replaced by species X and Y, respectively, where X and Y can be a vacancy (denoted as V) or another element3,13. We focus on emitters in the interior of the 2D crystal34,35 and do not consider defects that would likely appear at the sample edges or corners36,37.

The electronic energies obtained using DFT, while in general not representative of electronic or optical transitions, can be used for estimating qualitative trends. Figure 1 shows the lowest (HOMO-LUMO) spin-conserving transition energy of the candidate defects, obtained from DFT, together with the emission polarization inferred from structural symmetry. The defect structures considered here exhibit three different types of local symmetries, D3h, C2v, and Cs. In the high symmetry D3h structure, adopted by NB, VN, BN, CB, CN, ON, emitted light cannot be linearly polarized. Conversely, linearly polarized emitted light, as observed experimentally in hBN SPEs11, is possible in the C2v and Cs symmetries. In the C2v configuration, which is the most common among the defects investigated here, the threefold rotational symmetry is broken but all the atoms remain in-plane, preserving the mirror symmetry with respect to the crystal plane. The Cs symmetry found in the VNNB, VNCB, VNOB and OB defects is instead associated with an out-of-plane distortion that breaks the mirror symmetry about the plane. The DFT transition energies for the 22 defect structures range from 0 to 3.5 eV. In contrast, the ZPL of the measured SPEs are in the 1.6−2.2 eV energy range11, as shown by the shaded region in Fig. 1. While candidate structures with D3h symmetry can be ruled out, C2v and Cs structures with exceedingly small or large DFT transition energies also appear unlikely on the basis of the DFT results.

Fig. 1: DFT transition energy of candidate defect structures.
figure1

Distribution of the DFT transition energy, structural symmetry and emitted light polarization of 22 candidate defect structures. The shaded area shows the experimental range of values for SPEs in hBN.

Starting from the DFT ground state, for selected defects we compute the excited state properties with the GW-BSE method, obtaining the quasiparticle energies in the one-shot G0W0 approximation and the exciton energies and wave functions with the BSE, which captures electron-hole interaction and excitonic effects. We combine the solutions of the BSE with an approach we recently developed29,30 to compute the radiative lifetime of an exciton state from Fermi’s golden rule. Generalizing our previous formula for isolated (0D) emitters29 to include anisotropic dielectric screening in hBN, the radiative decay rate γS of an exciton state S is:

$${\gamma }_{S}=\frac{\sqrt{{\epsilon }_{xy}({{\bf{k}}}_{xy})}{e}^{2}{E}_{S}}{3\pi {\epsilon }_{0}{m}^{2}{c}^{3}{\hslash }^{2}}\left[\left(\frac{3}{4}+\frac{{\epsilon }_{z}}{4{\epsilon }_{xy}({k}_{xy})}\right)| {{\bf{p}}}_{S,xy}{| }^{2}+| {p}_{S,z}{| }^{2}\right]\ ,$$
(1)

where ϵxy(kxy) and ϵz are the in-plane and out-of-plane dielectric function of hBN, respectively, kxy is the in-plane photon wavevector, ES is the exciton energy and pS,xy and pS,z are the corresponding components of the exciton transition dipole. The radiative lifetime τS below is defined as the inverse of γS and accounts only for the radiative decay channel. We use a constant in-plane dielectric function for bulk hBN (ϵxy = 5) at optical wavelengths, and for monolayer hBN we take into account the dependence on wavevector k as ϵxy(k) ≈ 1 + 2πα2Dk38, where α2D is a constant equal to 0.4 nm39. In this approach, which is appropriate for 2D materials, the in-plane dielectric function of monolayer hBN reduces to a value of 1 at optical photon wavelengths.

Figure 2 shows the computed radiative lifetimes and lowest bright exciton energies for nine selected defects, including VN, BN, VNNB, CN, VNCB, CNVB, OB, ONVB, and VBON. We find that the exciton energy can differ significantly−by as much as 1 eV− from the corresponding DFT transition energy, which fails to account for screening and electron-hole interaction effects. This result is a testament to the importance of excited state calculations for investigating SPEs. Surprisingly, we find that the computed radiative lifetime for the selected structures span six orders of magnitude, from about 1 to 106 ns (1 ms), showing that the emission rate and brightness of quantum emitters in hBN can vary widely. The values typically found in experiments for the emission energy (1.6−2.2 eV) and radiative lifetime (1−10 ns) are also given for comparison in Fig. 2.

Writing the exciton transition dipole in Eq. (1) as pS = − (imES/e) × erS, with \(\left|{{\bf{r}}}_{S}\right|=\left|\left\langle 0\right|{\bf{r}}\left|S\right\rangle \right|\) to highlight its physical meaning of an atomic-scale dipole, and setting \(\left|{{\bf{r}}}_{S}\right|\) equal the B-N bond length, we obtain an upper bound estimate of the exciton transition dipole (of 6.9 Debye) because the excitons considered here are tightly bound to the defect. The resulting radiative lifetime as a function of exciton energy, as shown by the blue line in Fig. 2, gives an approximate lower bound to the calculated radiative lifetimes. Our calculated exciton energies and radiative lifetimes clearly follow the trend set by this lower bound. The physical insight of this analysis is that due to incomplete overlap of the electron and hole wavefunctions, the exciton transition dipole for most defects is significantly smaller than the bond length, leading to longer radiative lifetimes than this theoretical bound. We note that the experimental emission energies and lifetimes for defect emitters in hBN, indicated by the gray area in Fig. 2, fall almost entirely below this lower bound, suggesting that nonradiative decay processes need to play an important role if atomic point defects like the ones discussed here are responsible for SPE.

Fig. 2: Radiative lifetime and energy of the lowest bright exciton of candidate defect SPEs in hBN from GW-BSE calculations.
figure2

The range of experimental values is shown as a shaded region. The blue line shows the radiative lifetime of an exciton with an assumed transition dipole moment of 6.9 Debye.

Bayesian analysis of the likelihood of candidate defect structures

As the candidate defect structures have properties distributed across a wide range, it is challenging to pinpoint the correct defect structure from our results. As such, we pursue a quantitative analysis of the relative likelihood of the various structures using Bayesian inference, a statistical approach for dealing with uncertainties and combining information from different categories, in which the likelihood of a hypothesis is updated as more evidence or information becomes available40. The workflow of our analysis is shown in Fig. 3. We first generate candidate structures by systematically enumerating all possible structures where n adjacent atomic sites are replaced by a vacancy, antisite or impurity point defect. We then obtain the list of defects studied in our work by considering structures with n = 1 or 2 replacements, as defects spanning multiple sites are typically less likely to occur. We use carbon and oxygen as the impurity elements, the most likely impurities in hBN according to the current literature. This list of candidates includes structures similar to known solid-state quantum emitters such as the NV and SiV centers in diamond, and includes most of the hBN defect emitters proposed in the literature so far13,14,15,16,17,18,19 as well as additional structures that were not previously considered.

Fig. 3: Bayesian inference workflow.
figure3

Candidate structures are initially generated through combinatorial enumeration of point defects in hBN and attributed a prior likelihood based on structural complexity. The likelihood of each defect is then updated using results from our DFT calculations. For the most promising defect structures, the likelihood is refined using GW-BSE calculations.

A prior likelihood p(h) is then assigned to each candidate structure h as an initial guess of how likely it is that the defect structure can appear in the hBN crystal. The prior likelihood can be tailored to describe various experimental scenarios. For example, if carbon impurities are added in the experiment, as shown in recent work41, one could include the presence of a carbon impurity in the prior likelihood, therefore favoring the posterior likelihood of carbon-containing emitters. Here, without referring to specific experimental conditions, we choose the prior likelihood p(h) on the basis of the structural complexity of the defect, using the single exponential form \(p(h)\propto {S}_{h}{A}^{-{C}_{h}}\), where Ch measures the complexity of the structure, defined as the number of vacancies and antisite defects plus twice the number of impurities, A is a constant, and Sh is a degeneracy factor due to symmetry-related configurations.

We subsequently combine our computational results with experimental evidence to obtain a posterior likelihood p(hE) for each structure40:

$$p(h| E)\propto p(h)p(E| h),$$
(2)

where the likelihood function p(Eh) is the likelihood that the structure h is compatible with a specific piece of experimental evidence E on the basis of our calculations. The resulting posterior likelihood, which is updated in multiple steps using several computed properties, quantifies which structures among those considered are more likely to be defect emitters in hBN.

The properties of the candidate SPE defects and the results of our Bayesian inference analysis are summarized in Table 1. Moving in the table from left to right, the prior likelihood p(h) is updated to posterior likelihood p(hE) using calculations presented in subsequent columns. The first computed posterior likelihood, p1(hE), uses the DFT results to infer whether the defect symmetry is compatible with linearly polarized emission and whether the DFT transition energy, within a standard deviation of ~0.5 eV, falls in the 1.6−2.2 eV emission range found in experiments10,11,34. The final posterior likelihood p2(hE) in the rightmost column of Table 1 gives the likelihood of the most likely defect structures when all factors have been taken into account, including comparison between the lowest bright exciton energy and the experimental emission energy, and comparison with experiment of the radiative lifetime from our GW-BSE calculations. We emphasize that the absolute value of the likelihood is arbitrary and a value of 1 does not imply certainty. The likelihood shown in Table 1 is normalized so that the maximum value on each column is 1. The detailed rationale of our Bayesian analysis is described in the Supplementary Note 3.

Table 1 Calculated properties of candidate defect emitters in hBN and their likelihood based on Bayesian inference analysis.

The main finding from the data in Table 1 is that the VNNB defect, which was originally proposed as a SPE in hBN on the basis of DFT calculations3,13,18, possesses optical and radiative properties that most accurately match the experimental results, even after taking into account excitonic effects and radiative lifetimes. The next most likely structure is the oxygen impurity defect, OB, with an emission energy of 1.52 eV, just below the experimental range. On the other hand, we find that the VNCB defect, which is also considered a likely candidate in the literature based on DFT calculations13,18, has an emission energy of 2.6 eV that lies too far above the experimental energy range when excitonic effects are included, making it a less likely candidate. Although our analysis excludes VNCB and other defects with higher emission energies as candidates for the 1.6−2.2 eV SPEs, these structures may still be good candidates for SPEs in the ultraviolet range42,43. As the most likely defect emitter in hBN is the VNNB structure according to our analysis, we investigate it in more detail to better understand its radiative properties.

Figure 4(a) shows that the relaxed atomic structure of the VNNB defect in monolayer hBN exhibits an out-of-plane displacement of the central nitrogen (N) atom by z = 0.66 Å. If the structure is made planar by constraining the N atom to the hBN plane, the total energy of the system is only moderately higher (by 0.125 eV) than the equilibrium structure. Therefore the total energy forms a shallow double-well potential as a function of the out-of-plane N atom displacement. Consistent with recent findings44, this small energy difference suggests that the structure is soft in the out-of-plane direction and could fluctuate due to external perturbations.

To take this result into account, we compute the optical absorption spectrum of the VNNB defect for out-of-plane displacements z of the N atom in the 0−0.83 Å range, interpolating between the in-plane and out-of-plane equilibrium structures to obtain the intermediate metastable structures. We find that the absorption spectrum changes drastically even for small changes of z, as shown in Fig. 4(c). The spectrum is dominated by two exciton absorption peaks at low energy. At the equilibrium position (z = 0.66 Å), the first peak at 1.92 eV is associated with a transition from the top valence to the bottom conduction spin-majority electronic states, whose wave functions are shown in Fig. 4(b). As the displacement z of the N atom is decreased from the equilibrium value to zero, which corresponds to a planar structure, the energy of the first exciton peak decreases at first but then increases again at small z values while gaining oscillator strength monotonically. The second peak at 2.7 eV is also due to a transition from the top valence to the bottom conduction spin-minority bands with relatively large oscillator strength at the out-of-plane equilibrium N atom position. Both the energy and the oscillator strength of this peak decrease monotonically as z decreases [see Fig. 4(c)]. For the planar structure (z=0), the second peak becomes the lowest-energy transition but completely loses its oscillator strength and becomes a dark state.

Fig. 4: Properties of the VNNB defect.
figure4

a Atomic structure in top and side views, with N atoms shown as blue and B atoms as green spheres. Also shown in the side view is the N atom out-of-plane displacement z. b GW electronic band structure computed using a 5 × 5 supercell. The wave function of the two majority-spin bands that mainly contribute to the lowest-energy exciton are plotted on the right. c Absorption spectrum and (d) radiative lifetime as a function of the out-of-plane displacement z of the central N atom.

These significant changes in the two lowest-energy exciton peaks are accompanied by substantial changes in the exciton radiative lifetimes. Although the lifetime of the lowest exciton is 334 ns for the DFT equilibrium out-of-plane distortion, it becomes only 19 ns if the VNNB structure is kept planar (z = 0 case), as shown in Fig. 4(d). This value of the radiative lifetime for the planar structure is within a factor of 2−3 of experimental results11. Because many experiments are carried out on thicker hBN samples, we also calculated the radiative lifetime of the VNNB defect embedded in bulk hBN (instead of monolayer), a setting resembling more closely SPE experimental measurements in thicker hBN samples (see the “Methods” section). Due to interlayer interactions, the out-of-plane displacement of the N atom is reduced to 0.45 Å in bulk hBN. Going from monolayer to bulk reduces the radiative lifetime of the VNNB defect to 147 ns due to changes in the dielectric environment and transition dipole, both of which affect the radiative emission rate in Eq. (1). This result shows that different dielectric environments, for example due to the use of different substrates, may have a strong impact on the radiative properties of the defect. Therefore we conclude that the radiative lifetime of the VNNB defect is highly sensitive to both out-of-plane structural distortions and the dielectric environment.

Discussion

While our computed lifetimes are in the 20−350 ns range for different VNNB structures, these values pertain to an ideal defect with 100% quantum yield, whereas defect emission measured so far in hBN is likely associated with a lower quantum yield. To explain the discrepancy between the experimental and calculated lifetimes, note that nonradiative processes, which are not included in our calculation of intrinsic radiative lifetimes, could significantly reduce the apparent lifetime measured in experiments. For example, a defect with a measured 10 ns lifetime but only a 10% quantum yield would correspond to a 100 ns intrinsic radiative lifetime in the same range as our computed values. Future SPE measurements in hBN taking into account the quantum yield may provide a better estimate of the intrinsic SPE radiative lifetime and enable a more accurate comparison with our calculations.

In our study, we did not take into account the Frank-Condon shift or exciton-phonon coupling effects such as zero-point renormalization, which are beyond the scope of this work. Although these effects may cause small shifts of the exciton energy and lead to broadening or satellite peaks45,46, the overall transition dipole remains the same within the Frank-Condon approximation, and thus we expect minimal changes in the radiative lifetimes due to these effects. Note also the possible presence of charged defects in experiments4, which are not considered in this work.

In summary, we have investigated the excited state and radiative properties of many candidate defect SPEs in hBN. Our calculations address the photophysics of these defect structures, including their optical transitions and radiative lifetimes, using calculations that accurately account for excitonic effects and anisotropic dielectric screening. Our Bayesian statistical analysis allows us to identify the native VNNB defect as the most likely candidate within a wide pool of over 20 charge-neutral native defects and carbon or oxygen impurities. This work explores the fertile ground at the intersection of excited-state first-principles calculations and Bayesian learning methods, and the application of this framework to quantum technologies. The search for solid-state quantum emitters will greatly benefit from such precise first-principles calculations of excited states in materials.

Methods

Details of the first-principles calculations

We carry out DFT calculations in the generalized gradient approximation using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional47. Our spin-polarized DFT calculations employ the plane-wave pseudopotential method implemented in Quantum Espresso48. The defects are placed in a 5 × 5 supercell of hBN with the lattice constant kept fixed at 5 × 2.504 Å while the atoms are fully relaxed without symmetry constraints. For calculations on monolayer hBN, a vacuum of 15 Å is used to avoid spurious inter-layer interactions with the periodic replicas. We use ONCV pseudopotentials49,50 for all atoms, a plane-wave kinetic energy cutoff of 80 Ry and a 3 × 3 k-point Brillouin zone grid. The GW-BSE calculations are carried out with the Yambo code51,52 using a 2D slab cutoff of the Coulomb interaction. For calculations of defects in monolayer hBN, a 3 × 3 k-point grid is employed together with an energy cutoff of 10 Ry for the dielectric matrix. The number of empty bands included in the GW calculation (for the polarizability and self-energy summations) is 7 times the number of occupied bands. At least 6 valence and 6 conduction bands are included when diagonalizing the BSE matrix. These parameters converge the exciton energy to within 0.1 eV in our test calculations, which are shown in the Supplementary Note 1. For calculations on defects in bulk hBN, we use a 5 × 5 × 1 supercell containing two AA’-stacked layers. The bulk case uses a 2 × 2 × 3 k-point grid; all other parameters are the same as in the monolayer case.

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Information. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

References

  1. 1.

    Liu, X. & Hersam, M. C. 2D materials for quantum information science. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 669–684 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chen, X. Entanglement of single-photons and chiral phonons in atomically thin WSe2. Nat. Phys. 15, 221–227 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tran, T. T., Bray, K., Ford, M. J., Toth, M. & Aharonovich, I. Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 37–41 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gottscholl, A. Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der Waals crystal at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 19, 540–545 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Childress, L. Coherent dynamics of coupled electron and nuclear spin qubits in diamond. Science 314, 281–285 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ladd, T. D. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hensen, B. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Aharonovich, I., Englund, D. & Toth, M. Solid-state single-photon emitters. Nat. Photonics 10, 631–641 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Caldwell, J. D. Photonics with hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 552–567 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jungwirth, N. R. Temperature dependence of wavelength selectable zero-phonon emission from single defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nano Lett. 16, 6052–6057 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tran, T. T. Robust multicolor single photon emission from point defects in hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Nano 10, 7331–7338 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dietrich, A. Observation of fourier transform limited lines in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 98, 081414 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tawfik, S. A. First-principles investigation of quantum emission from hBN defects. Nanoscale 9, 13575–13582 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Weston, L., Wickramaratne, D., Mackoit, M., Alkauskas, A. & Van de Walle, C. G. Native point defects and impurities in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 97, 214104 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sajid, A., Reimers, J. R. & Ford, M. J. Defect states in hexagonal boron nitride: Assignments of observed properties and prediction of properties relevant to quantum computation. Phys. Rev. B 97, 064101 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    López-Morales, G. I., Proscia, N. V., López, G. E., Meriles, C. A. & V. M. Menon, Toward the identification of atomic defects in hexagonal boron nitride: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and first-principles calculations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.05924 (2018).

  17. 17.

    Noh, G. Stark tuning of single-photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride. Nano Lett. 18, 4710–4715 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Abdi, M., Chou, J. P., Gali, A. & Plenio, M. B. Color centers in hexagonal boron nitride monolayers: A group theory and ab initio analysis. ACS Photonics 5, 1967–1976 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Turiansky, M. E., Alkauskas, A., Bassett, L. C. & Van De Walle, C. G. Dangling bonds in hexagonal boron nitride as single-photon emitters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 127401 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bernardi, M., Palummo, M. & Grossman, J. C. Extraordinary sunlight absorption and one nanometer thick photovoltaics using two-dimensional monolayer materials. Nano Lett. 13, 3664 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Qiu, D. Y., Da Jornada, F. H. & Louie, S. G. Optical spectrum of MoS2: Many-body effects and diversity of exciton states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 216085 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Refaely-Abramson, S., Qiu, D. Y., Louie, S. G. & Neaton, J. B. Defect-induced modification of low-lying excitons and valley selectivity in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 167402 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Attaccalite, C., Bockstedte, M., Marini, A., Rubio, A. & Wirtz, L. Coupling of excitons and defect states in boron-nitride nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 83, 144115 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Reimers, J. R., Sajid, A., Kobayashi, R. & Ford, M. J. Understanding and calibrating density-functional-theory calculations describing the energy and spectroscopy of defect sites in hexagonal boron nitride. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 1602–1613 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    V., Ivády, et al. Ab initio theory of the negatively charged boron vacancy qubit in hexagonal boron nitride. npj Comput. Mater. 6 (2020).

  26. 26.

    Rohlfing, M. & Louie, S. G. Electron-hole excitations and optical spectra from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 62, 4927 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Palummo, M., Bernardi, M. & Grossman, J. C. Exciton radiative lifetimes in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 15, 2794 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chen, H.-Y., Palummo, M., Sangalli, D. & Bernardi, M. Theory and ab initio computation of the anisotropic light emission in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 18, 3839 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chen, H.-Y., Jhalani, V. A., Palummo, M. & Bernardi, M. Ab initio calculations of exciton radiative lifetimes in bulk crystals, nanostructures, and molecules. Phys. Rev. B 100, 075135 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jhalani, V. A., Chen, H.-Y., Palummo, M. & Bernardi, M. Precise radiative lifetimes in bulk crystals from first principles: the case of wurtzite gallium nitride. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 084001 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (OUP Oxford, 2000).

  32. 32.

    Kimble, H. J., Dagenais, M. & Mandel, L. Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 691 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hybertsen, M. S. & Louie, S. G. Electron correlation in semiconductors and insulators: Band gaps and quasiparticle energies. Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Exarhos, A. L., Hopper, D. A., Grote, R. R., Alkauskas, A. & Bassett, L. C. Optical signatures of quantum emitters in suspended hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Nano 11, 3328–3336 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hayee, F. Revealing multiple classes of stable quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride with correlated optical and electron microscopy. Nat. Mater. 19, 534–539 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Chejanovsky, N. Structural attributes and photodynamics of visible spectrum quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride. Nano Lett. 16, 7037–7045 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Choi, S. Engineering and localization of quantum emitters in large hexagonal boron nitride layers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 29642–29648 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cudazzo, P., Tokatly, I. V. & Rubio, A. Dielectric screening in two-dimensional insulators: Implications for excitonic and impurity states in graphane. Phys. Rev. B 84, 085406 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Andersen, K., Latini, S. & Thygesen, K. S. Dielectric genome of van der Waals heterostructures. Nano Lett. 15, 4616–4621 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Von Toussaint, U. Bayesian inference in physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 943–999 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mendelson, N. et al. Identifying carbon as the source of visible single-photon emission from hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Mater. (2020).

  42. 42.

    Bourrellier, R. Bright UV single photon emission at point defects in h-BN. Nano Lett. 16, 4317–4321 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tan, Q.-H. et al. Ultraviolet to near-infrared single photon emitters in hBN. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06578 (2019).

  44. 44.

    Li, S. et al. Giant shift upon strain on the fluorescence spectrum of VNNB color centers in h-BN. NPJ Quantum Information. 6, 85 (2020). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-020-00312-y.

  45. 45.

    Jungwirth, N. R. & Fuchs, G. D. Optical absorption and emission mechanisms of single defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 057401 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Mishra, H. & Bhattacharya, S. Giant exciton-phonon coupling and zero-point renormalization in hexagonal monolayer boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 99, 165201 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Giannozzi, P. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hamann, D. R. Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Schlipf, M. & Gygi, F. Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 196, 36–44 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Marini, A., Hogan, C., Grüning, M. & Varsano, D. Yambo: an ab initio tool for excited state calculations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1392–1403 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Sangalli, D. Many-body perturbation theory calculations using the yambo code. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 31, 325902 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge valuable discussions with Hamidreza Akbari. This work was supported by the Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-SC0019166. The radiative lifetime code development was partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ACI-1642443. H.-Y.C. was partially supported by the J. Yang Fellowship. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.G. and M.B. conceived and designed the research. S.G. performed calculation and analysis. H.-Y.C. provided theoretical support. M.B. supervised the entire research project. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Bernardi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, S., Chen, HY. & Bernardi, M. Radiative properties of quantum emitters in boron nitride from excited state calculations and Bayesian analysis. npj Comput Mater 7, 85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00544-2

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing