Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Breast adipocyte size associates with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer risk after ductal carcinoma in situ

Abstract

Although ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor to ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC), most DCIS lesions remain indolent. Hence, overdiagnosis and overtreatment of DCIS is a major concern. There is an urgent need for prognostic markers that can distinguish harmless from potentially hazardous DCIS. We hypothesised that features of the breast adipose tissue may be associated with risk of subsequent iIBC. We performed a case–control study nested in a population-based DCIS cohort, consisting of 2658 women diagnosed with primary DCIS between 1989 and 2005, uniformly treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) alone. We assessed breast adipose features with digital pathology (HALO®, Indica Labs) and related these to iIBC risk in 108 women that developed subsequent iIBC (cases) and 168 women who did not (controls) by conditional logistic regression, accounting for clinicopathological and immunohistochemistry variables. Large breast adipocyte size was significantly associated with iIBC risk (odds ratio (OR) 2.75, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.25–6.05). High cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 protein expression in the DCIS cells was also associated with subsequent iIBC (OR 3.70 (95% CI = 1.59–8.64). DCIS with both high COX-2 expression and large breast adipocytes was associated with a 12-fold higher risk (OR 12.0, 95% CI = 3.10–46.3, P < 0.001) for subsequent iIBC compared with women with smaller adipocyte size and low COX-2 expression. Large breast adipocytes combined with high COX-2 expression in DCIS is associated with a high risk of subsequent iIBC. Besides COX-2, adipocyte size has the potential to improve clinical management in patients diagnosed with primary DCIS.

Introduction

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor to invasive breast cancer (IBC). DCIS incidence has increased manifold since the implementation of population-based mammographic breast cancer screening1,2,3,4. In Western countries, DCIS comprises 15–30% of all newly diagnosed breast neoplasms3,4,5,6. DCIS is generally treated with surgery, often followed by radiotherapy and sometimes adjuvant hormonal therapy. The majority of patients with primary DCIS, however, will not develop a subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC)7,8,9,10, suggesting overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Clinicians urgently need prognostic biomarkers to distinguish hazardous from indolent DCIS for adequate risk stratification. Previous studies identified several clinicopathological prognostic factors for subsequent in situ or IBC recurrences11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. A previous study in our Dutch nationwide DCIS cohort revealed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, high cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 protein expression and the presence of periductal fibrosis as promising markers for predicting subsequent iIBC after primary DCIS13.

Obesity prevalence is rapidly increasing25 and is associated with an increased risk for developing postmenopausal IBC26,27,28,29,30,31 and poorer outcome in pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer32,33. Obesity at initial DCIS diagnosis has also been associated with increased risk of second breast cancers34.

Body mass index (BMI) alone is not sufficient for assessing adipose-tissue-related risk of IBC, as some postmenopausal women with higher body fat level have an elevated risk for IBC, despite of a normal BMI35. Increased adiposity is associated with (breast) adipocyte hypertrophy and low-grade inflammation of white adipose tissue (WAT), resulting from hypertrophic dying adipocytes encircled by macrophages forming crown-like structures (CLS)29,36,37. Although present in the majority of obese and overweight individuals38, enlarged adipocytes and WAT inflammation have also been found in the breast tissue of women with a normal BMI39. Apart from chronic inflammation of WAT, hyperadiposity commonly leads to altered local steroid hormone biosynthesis and disruptions in adipokine levels and insulin metabolism40,41,42,43. The altered microenvironment of (mammary) hyperadiposity has been associated with increased breast cancer risk44.

Although adipose tissue is a major component of the mammary gland, its potential role in development of subsequent iIBC after primary DCIS has received little attention. We hypothesised that breast adipocyte hypertrophy in DCIS is associated with a risk of subsequent iIBC.

Results

Patient and baseline characteristics

Basic characteristics of our nested case–control study within a nationwide population-based cohort are described in the Methods section. A total of 276 DCIS patients that have undergone breast conserving surgery (BCS) alone were included in this case–control study (Fig. 1). Cases (n = 108) are women with specimen histology showing pure DCIS that predates diagnosis of iIBC. Controls (n = 168) are women with pure DCIS that have not developed subsequent iIBC and are matched for age of DCIS diagnosis (± 0 to 6 months). Median time from primary DCIS diagnosis to iIBC was 5.8 years (range 0.5–19.2). Clinical characteristics were comparable across cases and controls (Table 1). As the majority of DCIS patients was diagnosed during the implementation phase of mammographic screening (1989–1998), the proportion detected by mammographic screening was only 48%.

Fig. 1: Diagram of women with DCIS included in the analysis.
figure 1

Abbreviations BCS: breast conserving surgery; iIBC: ipsilateral invasive breast cancer; FFPE: formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded; LCIS: lobular carcinoma in situ; IHC: immunohistochemistry. The cohort consisted of 2658 women with primary DCIS treated with BCS alone, of which 374 women developed subsequent iIBC, as first invasive cancer. At the start of the study, we received FFPE blocks of 255 and 915 controls. Some patients were excluded because no matched case or control was available for the case–control set they were part of. In total, 108 cases and 168 controls were included in the study.

Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics of women with primary DCIS.

Histologic grade was comparable between cases and controls. Grade 1 was found in 13.9% of cases and 13.1% of controls, grade 2 in 56.5% of cases and 61.9% of controls and grade 3 in 29.6% of cases versus 25.0% of controls (Table 2). DCIS phenotype in terms of dominant growth pattern, lesion size, presence of necrosis, calcifications, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 did not differ between cases and controls (Table 2). Periductal fibrosis (P = 0.10) and positive margin status (P = 0.10) were somewhat more common among cases compared to controls. Both margin status and lesion size were not always reliably reported in these older patient series and for 16% and 67%, respectively, these data were missing.

Table 2 Univariate results of histopathological characteristics and IHC markers associated with subsequent iIBC.

Immunohistochemical COX-2 expression was scored as “low” or “high” and the scoring system was described in detail in the Methods section. COX-2 expression was significantly more often highly expressed in cases compared to controls (odds ratio (OR) 3.70, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.59–8.64, P < 0.001; Table 2).

Breast adipocyte measurements

Breast WAT features including relative amount (percentage) of adipose tissue, adipocyte diameter at the 75th percentile (adipocyte diameter75th) and adipocyte area at the 75th percentile (adipocyte area75th) were assessed with digital pathology among all patients (see Methods). Median percentage of breast adipose tissue was 65% (interquartile range (IQR) 47–77%). A median number of 2514 adipocytes was measured per patient with digital pathology (IQR 1313–5419). Median adipocyte diameter at the 75th percentile (adipocyte diameter75th) was 86 µm (IQR 77–94) and median adipocyte area at the 75th percentile (adipocyte area75th) was 6174 µm2 (IQR 5165–7604), respectively. Figure 2 illustrates the appearance and distribution of adipocytes in two representative patients.

Fig. 2: Digital assessment of breast adipocyte area in two representative patients. Scale bars represent 500 µm.
figure 2

a A 68-year-old patient with DCIS that developed subsequent iIBC. The breast adipose tissue consists of large adipocytes. b Adipocytes were analysed with the vacuole module v2.1 (HALO software, Indica Labs, Corrales, NM, USA). c Beeswarm plot of the corresponding distribution of adipocyte area with mean adipocyte area and area75th of 7287 and 10493 µm2, respectively. d DCIS surrounded by small adipocytes from a 38-year-old patient. No subsequent iIBC occurred during follow-up. e Corresponding image of analysed adipocytes in HALO software. f Beeswarm plot of the corresponding distribution of adipocyte area with mean adipocyte area and area75th of 2593 and 3274 µm2, respectively.

Higher relative area of breast adipose tissue and larger adipocyte size were significantly associated with higher age (P < 0.001, Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 1). The age group of >55 years, used as a proxy for postmenopausal status, shows a significantly higher relative area of mammary adipose tissue (P < 0.001) and larger adipocyte size (P < 0.001) than the age group of <45 years.

Fig. 3: Older DCIS patients have a higher percentage of breast adipose tissue and larger adipocyte size.
figure 3

a A higher percentage of mammary adipose tissue in one representative slide per DCIS patient is significantly associated with older age in n = 249 (unique) DCIS patients. *P = 0.002, **P = 0.028, ***P < 0.001 (Mann-Whitney U Test), overall P < 0.001 (Kruskal-Wallis test). b Larger mammary adipocyte size is significantly associated with older age. *P = 0.049, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.001 (Student’s t-test), overall P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA).

Assessment of crown-like structures (CLS)

CLS assessment as a measure for WAT inflammation was possible for 56 DCIS patients (26 cases matched with 30 controls) for whom at least five paraffin blocks were available. Median number of CLS per 10 cm2 was 1.4 (range 0–211 CLS/10 cm2, IQR 0–8 CLS/10 cm2). The number of CLS per 10 cm2 correlated with adipocyte area75th (ρ = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.23–0.66, P < 0.001, Supplementary Fig. 2). In the subset of DCIS patients for which CLS/10 cm2 was assessed, subsequent iIBC risk did not differ between patients with a high (≥5 CLS/10 cm2) and a low (<5 CLS/10 cm2) CLS count (OR 1.2, 95% CI = 0.43–3.35, Supplementary Table 2).

Adipocyte characteristics associated with subsequent iIBC

Breast adipocyte size at primary DCIS diagnosis was positively associated with risk for a subsequent iIBC (Table 3). For each 10 µm increase in adipocyte diameter75th (range 47–118 µm), the OR for a subsequent iIBC increased with 25% (95% CI = 1.02–1.54), while for each 103 µm2 increase in adipocyte area75th (range 2016–11569 µm2) the OR for subsequent iIBC increased with 17% (95% CI = 1.01–1.35). Women with an adipocyte area75th within the highest quartile had a 2.75-fold (95% CI = 1.25–6.05) increased risk for subsequent iIBC compared to women with an adipocyte area75th within the lowest quartile. When compared to women with an adipocyte area75th within the lowest three quartiles, women with an adipocyte area75th of the highest quartile had a 2.08 times (95% CI = 1.16–3.74) increased risk for subsequent iIBC. Relative area of breast adipose tissue was not associated with subsequent iIBC risk.

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate results of adipocyte characteristics and COX-2 expression in relation to subsequent iIBC.

We also assessed whether adipocyte area75th remained associated with iIBC risk when adjusted the presence of periductal fibrosis, Her2 status and COX-2 expression in DCIS cells (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3). In the presence of high COX-2 expression, adipocyte area75th remained an independent predictor of subsequent iIBC. Women with an adipocyte area75th within the highest quartile had a 3.05-fold (95% CI = 1.32–7.05) increased risk for subsequent iIBC compared to women with an adipocyte area75th within the lowest quartile, while COX-2 was an independent predictor for iIBC in the presence of adipocyte area75th (OR 4.33, 95% CI 1.79–10.5). Compared to women with an adipocyte area75th within quartiles 1–3, women with an adipocyte area75th within the highest quartile had a 2.34-fold increased risk for subsequent iIBC (OR 2.34, 95% CI = 1.23–4.45, Table 3) while COX-2 was an independent predictor for iIBC in the presence of adipocyte area75th (OR 4.24, 95% CI = 1.76–10.2). The risk of subsequent iIBC in DCIS patients with high COX-2 expression and an adipocyte area75th within the highest quartile was 12 times higher than in DCIS patients with low COX-2 expression and an smaller (quartile 1–3) adipocyte area75th (OR 12.0, 95% CI = 3.10–46.3, Table 3).

Periductal fibrosis and Her2 were no independent predictors in a model which already contained adipocyte area75th and COX-2, and did not change the estimate for adipocyte area75th and COX-2 (Supplementary Table 3).

The estimated overall 10- and 15-year cumulative iIBC incidence in our study population was 10.9% and 13.8%, respectively (Fig. 4). DCIS patients with large breast adipocytes and high COX-2 expression (area75thq4/COX-2high) had a 10- and 15-year cumulative incidence of 22.7% and 28.7%, respectively (Fig. 4), while DCIS patients with smaller breast adipocytes (area75thq1–3) and low COX-2 expression had an estimated 10- and 15-year iIBC cumulative incidence of 2.0% and 2.6%, respectively. Within our study population, a combination of large adipocyte size and high COX-2 expression (area75thq4/COX-2high) was present in 25.9% of cases and 14.3% of controls (Table 3).

Fig. 4: Estimated cumulative incidence of subsequent iIBC in DCIS for a combination of adipocyte area75th and COX-2 status.
figure 4

Estimated cumulative incidence of iIBC per category of adipocyte area75th/COX-2 status among women with primary DCIS treated by BCS alone. Cumulative incidence of subsequent iIBC by adipocyte area75th and COX-2 status was estimated using the ORs for adipocyte area75th and COX-2 status from the current study. The cumulative risk of iIBC and death due to other causes was derived from the full cohort.

Discussion

In this study we investigated mammary adiposity in relation to risk of subsequent iIBC after primary DCIS. We show that the presence of large breast adipocytes in primary DCIS is associated with a risk for subsequent iIBC. DCIS with high COX-2 expression, a cytoplasmic enzyme involved in prostaglandin synthesis, was also associated with iIBC risk, as we previously showed13. Moreover, in combination with high COX-2 expression in DCIS cells, patients with large breast adipocyte size (area75th, highest quartile) have a 12-fold increased risk for a subsequent iIBC, resulting in an estimated 10- and 15-year cumulative iIBC incidence of 22.7% and 28.7%, respectively. Women with smaller breast adipocytes (area75th, quartiles 1–3) in combination with low COX-2 have a 10- and 15-year cumulative iIBC incidence of 2.0% and 3.9%, respectively, which is similar to the 10- and 15-year breast cancer incidence in the general population. However, it should be noted that the DCIS patients in this lowest risk category have been treated (with BCS alone). Taken together, besides COX-2 expression, breast adipocyte size appears to be promising for clinical management in primary DCIS.

Several other important findings have emerged from this study. Firstly, we found that women with DCIS in the age group of <45 years on average have the smallest adipocytes and the lowest percentage of mammary adipose tissue among all age groups. DCIS patients in the age group >55 years (as a proxy of postmenopausal status) have the largest adipocytes and highest relative area of adipose tissue. The association between breast adipocyte characteristics and age underlines that matching DCIS cases and controls for age is essential. Iyengar et al. found a correlation between breast adipocyte size, CLS and postmenopausal status among breast cancer patients that underwent mastectomy36. As DCIS incidence sharply rises during menopause and is highest in the postmenopausal group (60% of all patients in our study are >55 years), future research may focus on the role of adipocytes in the pathogenesis of iIBC after primary DCIS in the context of the menopausal transition.

Secondly, we found that breast adipocyte size correlates with adipose inflammation expressed as the number of CLS per 10 cm2. Number of breast CLS and BMI previously has been shown to correlate with breast adipocyte diameter in IBC36,39,45. Carter et al. found that a high CLS count (>5 CLS/sample) was associated with subsequent IBC (OR 6.8, 95% CI = 1.4–32.4) in biopsies of 172 patients with benign breast disease44. In our study, number of CLS/10 cm2 was not associated with subsequent iIBC in 56 DCIS patients, although the analysis had low power to detect such an association.

WAT inflammation has been associated with elevated secretion of proinflammatory mediators and adipokines such as COX-2, TNF-α, IL-1ß and leptin46,47, resulting in the induction of aromatase, the rate-limiting enzyme for oestrogen biosynthesis48. The subsequent locally produced oestrogen may be a key driver to ER-positive IBC. In the present study, however, ER status alone was not a predictor of iIBC risk and did not significantly change the risk estimate when added to a model containing adipocyte area75th and COX-2. The study potentially lacked power to show significant interaction. Larger studies and mechanistic studies are needed to investigate the relationship between WAT inflammation, COX-2, ER status and outcome after primary DCIS.

Our study presented some limitations. Firstly, BMI was not available from the old patient records from 1989–2004 in our study. However, a study of Iyengar et al. indicates that BMI is not always an appropriate proxy for breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women, because women with increased body fat as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are at elevated risk of breast cancer despite of a normal BMI35. Furthermore, a second study of Iyengar et al. in women with a normal BMI undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction showed WAT inflammation in 39% of women39. Since WAT inflammation was associated with larger breast adipocytes, higher circulating leptin levels and increased aromatase in breast tissue, breast adipocyte size may be more accurate for breast cancer risk assessment than BMI alone39.

Secondly, in 35% of the DCIS lesions, breast adipocytes were too severely damaged and therefore we were unable to assess adipocyte size in these patients. In addition, analyses of CLS were limited by the relatively low number of DCIS patients with ≥5 available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks. In order to increase the number of DCIS specimen with intact and sufficient breast adipose tissue, future studies on breast adipocytes could benefit from adaptations in the surgical breast pathology pipeline.

Thirdly, data on lesion size was often missing (67% of patients). Furthermore, patients with a positive margin status typically undergo a re-excision lumpectomy or mastectomy according to Dutch guidelines. The final margin status after re-excision was not reliably registered between 1989 and 2004. Among the patients with known lesion size and margin status, no significant differences were observed between cases and controls.

A major strength of our study is the population-based nested case–control design allowing for the study of a high number of subsequent iIBC with long-term follow-up. Treatment of DCIS with BCS alone was more commonly practiced between 1989 and 2004. All DCIS patients received a uniform treatment of BCS alone, without radiotherapy or endocrine therapy that could impact subsequent iIBC risk. Furthermore, the population-based nature and the fact that the patient-material was derived from 58 different pathology laboratories, makes our results potentially more generalisable.

The study is further strengthened by the use of digital pathology, enabling tissue segmentation and the automatic evaluation of the diameter and area of high numbers of intact adipocytes. The measurement of the adipocyte area rather than its diameter approximates the three-dimensional nature of an adipocyte in real life more accurately, as compared to manual measurements.

In conclusion, breast adipocyte area75th and COX-2 are promising prognostic markers for prediction of iIBC risk in primary DCIS patients. Patients with an adipocyte area75thq4/COX-2high DCIS lesions when treated with BCS alone, had a 12-fold increased risk for subsequent iIBC compared to adipocyte area75thq1-3/COX-2low DCIS lesions, and thus may benefit from more careful monitoring during follow-up.

As a next step, our findings need to be confirmed in independent cohorts in which not only subsequent iIBC but also contralateral iIBC risk is considered49, after which our findings could be used to improve clinical management at primary DCIS diagnosis. Further studies are needed to unravel the exact underlying mechanisms behind the notable associations of mammary adiposity, adipocyte inflammation and anthropometric factors. The acquired insights may be used to reduce risk of subsequent iIBC after primary DCIS.

Methods

Study population

We conducted a nested case–control study within a nationwide population-based cohort of 2658 DCIS women diagnosed in the Netherlands with primary DCIS between 1 January 1989 and 31 December 2004, and a median follow-up of 12.0 years (IQR 9.0–15.3). Women were uniformly treated with BCS without radiotherapy and/or anti-hormonal therapy. A detailed description of this cohort was published previously9,13. Women with primary DCIS that developed iIBC were defined as cases. Controls correspond to women with primary DCIS that did not develop iIBC for at least the same follow-up duration as time to iIBC in the corresponding cases. Cases and controls were matched for age at DCIS diagnosis (±0 to 6 months). Cases and controls were not matched for year of diagnosis. None of the patients developed subsequent contralateral IBC while on study. FFPE tissue blocks and pathology reports were obtained from 58 pathology laboratories in the Netherlands13. Margin status and lesion size were not routinely registered in the pathology reports, especially not in the older cases of our retrospective series.

The study was approved by the review boards of the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch National Pathology Automated Archive (PALGA). The secondary use of tissue and data in this study is covered by an opt-out regimen conform Dutch regulations, the Code of Conduct of Federa-COREON50 and the international Guideline on Good Clinical Practice. The study also meets the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) criteria that came into effect on 25 May 2019.

Adipocyte measurements with digital pathology

After sample selection, intact adipose tissue was assessed in haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides from 108 cases and 168 controls. In each case–control set, a case was matched with at least 1 control.

Breast adipose tissue was characterised by digital pathology using HALO® image analysis software (v2.2, Indica Labs, Corrales, NM, USA). For each patient, one representative H&E slide had previously been selected for histopathological assessment and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of DCIS. For the measurement of adipocyte size, areas of intact adipocytes at a distance of ≥500 µm from a DCIS duct were annotated by two experienced pathologists (M.M.A. and J.S.), blinded for case or control status. DCIS patients without intact breast adipocytes (adipocytes with intact membranes) were excluded.

Representative whole slides were scanned with a 20x objective using a Leica Aperio AT2 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). To assess the relative amount of breast adipose tissue, we trained a supervised machine learning algorithm (random forest classifier) to recognise adipose, stromal and epithelial compartments from which the corresponding tissue surface and percentage were calculated.

Adipocyte diameter (µm) was digitally assessed with the HALO vacuole module v2.1 and calculated as follows: the algorithm of the HALO vacuole module calculated the centroid of the object. Subsequently, 18 diameters were passed through the centroid at different angles taken at 10-degree increments, from which the median was taken. The algorithm settings included conditions on the roundness and the regularity of the contours of the measured objects in order to discriminate between intact adipocytes and in-between areas. The same algorithm settings were used for all patients.

Measurements with a diameter under 30 µm were not considered in our analysis in order to discriminate mature adipocytes from artefacts36. To guarantee the measurement of true and intact adipocytes, we systematically determined adipocyte size at the 75th percentile of the adipocyte population of each patient as the unique value characterising adipocyte size of that patient. Taken together, digital breast adipose characterisation resulted in percentage of adipose tissue, adipocyte diameter at the 75th percentile (adipocyte diameter75th) and adipocyte surface area at the 75th percentile (adipocyte area75th) for each patient.

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry

H&E slides, histopathological data as well as ER, PR, HER2 and COX-2 IHC data were already available as previously described13. Antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

CD68 IHC analysis of 56 FFPE DCIS samples was performed on a BenchMark Ultra autostainer. Briefly, paraffin sections were cut at 3 µm, heated at 75 °C for 28 min and deparaffinized in the instrument with EZ prep solution (Ventana Medical Systems). Heat-induced antigen retrieval was carried out using Cell Conditioning 1 (CC1, Ventana Medical Systems) for 32 min at 95 °C. CD68 was detected using clone KP1 (Cat. No. M0814, 1/10,000 dilution, 32 min at 37 °C, Agilent / DAKO). Bound antibody was detected using the OptiView DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems). Slides were counterstained with Haematoxylin and Bluing Reagent (Ventana Medical Systems). IHC stained slides were scanned using an Aperio AT2 Slide Scanner (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).

A CLS was defined as an adipocyte surrounded by a rim of CD68-positive macrophages. In order to investigate sufficient amounts of breast adipose tissue, one section of CD68 IHC data were generated on five different FFPE blocks per patient39,45,51,52. At least five tissue blocks were available in a subset of 56 DCIS patients (26 cases and 30 controls). Number of CLS per 10 cm2 of adipose tissue as a measure of adipocyte inflammation was assessed by an experienced pathologist (M.M.A.).

Statistical analyses

Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate associations of adipocyte size, relative area of adipose tissue and number of CLS/10 cm2 adipose tissue with subsequent iIBC risk after primary DCIS. ORs were calculated as estimates of relative risks (RR); while 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were Wald-based and P-values were likelihood ratio-based. We subsequently assessed whether adipocyte size remained an independent predictor of subsequent iIBC risk when accounting for the association of other histopathological (dominant growth pattern, grade, necrosis, calcifications, periductal fibrosis and periductal lymphocytes) and immunohistochemical features (ER, PR, HER2 and COX-2) with iIBC risk. Margin status and lesion size were excluded from the multivariable models because they were not always reliably reported in these older patient series and part of data was missing. Variables showing association with IBC risk at a P-value ≤ 0.1 were included in a multivariable model. Model fit was assessed by likelihood ratio tests or Akaike information criterion, in case of non-nested models. We also evaluated whether variables with a main effect in multivariable analysis modified the association of adipocyte size with subsequent iIBC risk by adding an interaction-term to our model.

BMI and menopausal status were not available. The following age categories were used to approximate menopausal status: <45 years (premenopausal), ≥45–55 years (perimenopausal) and ≥55 years (postmenopausal). Both relative area of breast adipose tissue and adipocyte size were correlated with age using these age categories as a proxy for menopausal status in all unique patients (n = 249). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess departure from the normality assumption. Relative area of adipose tissue was compared between age categories using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. For comparisons of adipocyte size with age the student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA test was used. Correlation of the number of CLS/10 cm2 of adipose tissue and adipocyte size was assessed by the Spearman’s rho test.

We estimated the expected cumulative incidence of breast cancer for our population from the expected breast cancer incidence and expected all-cause mortality based on the Hakulinen method53 and using age-specific breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Dutch female population. All-cause mortality rates were derived from the Central Bureau of Statistics in The Netherlands while age-specific breast cancer incidence was provided by the nationwide Dutch Cancer Registry (NKR), using 5-year band for age 1-year band for calendar year.

Statistical analyses were two-sided and P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using Stata/SE (version 13.1, StataCorp), software packages SPSS for Windows version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and Graph Pad Prism 7.0 (Graph Pad Prism Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Beeswarm plots to represent adipocyte size distribution of individual patients were performed in R (software version 4.0.3, R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria; http://www.r-project.org) using ggplot2 and dplyr packages.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry data, and data on adipocyte measurements using digital pathology, which support the findings of this study, are not publicly available in order to protect patient privacy. The data will be made available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author, Prof. Jelle Wesseling, email address: j.wesseling@nki.nl. The data generated and analysed during this study are described in the following metadata record: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1358053154

Code availability

Codes of Stata/SE (version 13.1. StataCorp) and R (software version 4.0.3) are available upon request. Information about the machine learning algorithms of HALO (version 2.2, Indica Labs, Corrales, NM, USA) and the Vacuole module version 2.1 is available upon request. Please contact the corresponding author.

References

  1. Ernster, V. L. et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 94, 1546–1554 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kerlikowske, K. Epidemiology of ductal carcinoma in situ. J. Natl Cancer Inst. Monogr. 2010, 139–141 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. UK CR. Breast Carcinoma in Situ (1993–2017). https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/breast-cancer/incidence-in-situ#heading-Two (accessed April 2020).

  4. IKNL, NCCO. DCIS Incidence Trends Over Time. Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands. https://www.iknl.nl/nieuws/2018/borstkanker-in-nederland-trends-over-de-periode-19 (accessed April 2020).

  5. DeSantis, C. E. et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 69, 438–451 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Howlader, N. et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2017. National Cancer Institute. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2017/ (based on November 2019 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website, April 2020).

  7. Elshof, L. E. et al. Cause-specific mortality in a population-based cohort of 9799 women treated for ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann. Surg. 267, 952–958 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stuart, K. E., Houssami, N., Taylor, R., Hayen, A. & Boyages, J. Long-term outcomes of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. BMC Cancer 15, 890 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elshof, L. E. et al. Subsequent risk of ipsilateral and contralateral invasive breast cancer after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: incidence and the effect of radiotherapy in a population-based cohort of 10,090 women. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 159, 553–563 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryser, M. D. et al. Cancer outcomes in DCIS patients without locoregional treatment. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 111, 952–960 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rakovitch, E. et al. Refined estimates of local recurrence risks by DCIS score adjusting for clinicopathological features: a combined analysis of ECOG-ACRIN E5194 and Ontario DCIS cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 169, 359–369 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rakovitch, E. et al. HER2/neu and Ki-67 expression predict non-invasive recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Br. J. cancer 106, 1160–1165 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Visser, L.L. et al. Clinicopathological risk factors for an invasive breast cancer recurrence after ductal carcinoma in situ—a nested case–control study.Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 3593–3601 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Molinaro, A. M., Sison, J. D., Ljung, B. M., Tlsty, T. D. & Kerlikowske, K. Risk prediction for local versus regional/metastatic tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis treated by lumpectomy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 157, 351–361 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Curigliano, G. et al. Risk of subsequent in situ and invasive breast cancer in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann. Oncol. 26, 682–687 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheung, S., Booth, M. E., Kearins, O. & Dodwell, D. Risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Breast 23, 807–811 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong, I. et al. Age at diagnosis predicts local recurrence in women treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based outcomes analysis. Curr. Oncol. 21, e96–e104 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holmberg, L. et al. Mammography casting-type calcification and risk of local recurrence in DCIS: analyses from a randomised study. Br. J. cancer 108, 812–819 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Collins, L. C. et al. Risk factors for non-invasive and invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 139, 453–460 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kerlikowske, K. et al. Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 95, 1692–1702 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kerlikowske, K. et al. Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 102, 627–637 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ringberg, A. et al. Histopathological risk factors for ipsilateral breast events after breast conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast–results from the Swedish randomised trial. Eur. J. Cancer 43, 291–298 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hwang, E. S. et al. Association between breast density and subsequent breast cancer following treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 16, 2587–2593 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bijker, N. et al. Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. J. Clin. Oncol. 19, 2263–2271 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ward, Z. J. et al. Projected U.S. state-level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 2440–2450 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reeves, G. K. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: cohort study. BMJ 335, 1134 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhaskaran, K. et al. Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5.24 million UK adults. Lancet 384, 755–765 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sebastiani, F. et al. Increased incidence of breast cancer in postmenopausal women with high body mass index at the modena screening program. J. Breast Cancer 19, 283–291 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neuhouser, M. L. et al. Overweight, obesity, and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer risk: a secondary analysis of the women’s health initiative randomized clinical trials. JAMA Oncol. 1, 611–621 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Renehan, A. G., Tyson, M., Egger, M., Heller, R. F. & Zwahlen, M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 371, 569–578 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van den Brandt, P. A. et al. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 152, 514–527 (2000).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chan, D. S. et al. Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies. Ann. Oncol. 25, 1901–1914 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Goodwin, P. J. et al. Insulin- and obesity-related variables in early-stage breast cancer: correlations and time course of prognostic associations. J. Clin. Oncol. 30, 164–171 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Flanagan, M. R. et al. Relationship between anthropometric factors and risk of second breast cancer among women with a history of ductal carcinoma in situ. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2, pky020 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Iyengar, N. M. et al. Association of body fat and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women with normal body mass index: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial and observational study. JAMA Oncol. 5, 155–163 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Iyengar, N. M. et al. Menopause is a determinant of breast adipose inflammation. Cancer Prev. Res. (Philos.) 8, 349–358 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vaysse, C. et al. Inflammation of mammary adipose tissue occurs in overweight and obese patients exhibiting early-stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 3, 19 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun, X. et al. Normal breast tissue of obese women is enriched for macrophage markers and macrophage-associated gene expression. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 131, 1003–1012 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Iyengar, N. M. et al. Metabolic obesity, adipose inflammation and elevated breast aromatase in women with normal body mass index. Cancer Prev. Res. (Philos.) 10, 235–243 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Howe, L. R., Subbaramaiah, K., Hudis, C. A. & Dannenberg, A. J. Molecular pathways: adipose inflammation as a mediator of obesity-associated cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 6074–6083 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosen, E. D. & Spiegelman, B. M. What we talk about when we talk about fat. Cell 156, 20–44 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goodwin, P.J. et al. Effect of metformin vs placebo on and metabolic factors in NCIC CTG MA.32.J. Natl Cancer Inst. 107, djv006 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kershaw, E. E. & Flier, J. S. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89, 2548–2556 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Carter, J. M. et al. Macrophagic “Crown-like Structures” are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in benign breast disease. Cancer Prev. Res. (Philos.) 11, 113–119 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Morris, P. G. et al. Inflammation and increased aromatase expression occur in the breast tissue of obese women with breast cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. (Philos.) 4, 1021–1029 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Subbaramaiah, K. et al. Increased levels of COX-2 and prostaglandin E2 contribute to elevated aromatase expression in inflamed breast tissue of obese women. Cancer Discov. 2, 356–365 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lee, J. Y., Sohn, K. H., Rhee, S. H. & Hwang, D. Saturated fatty acids, but not unsaturated fatty acids, induce the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 mediated through Toll-like receptor 4. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 16683–16689 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Irahara, N., Miyoshi, Y., Taguchi, T., Tamaki, Y. & Noguchi, S. Quantitative analysis of aromatase mRNA expression derived from various promoters (I.4, I.3, PII and I.7) and its association with expression of TNF-alpha, IL-6 and COX-2 mRNAs in human breast cancer. Int J. Cancer 118, 1915–1921 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Giardiello, D. et al. Prediction of contralateral breast cancer: external validation of risk calculators in 20 international cohorts. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 181, 423–434 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Federa-COREON. Dutch Regulations and the Code of Conduct (Federa-COREON, 2004).

  51. Brown, K. A. et al. Menopause is a determinant of breast aromatase expression and its associations with BMI, inflammation, and systemic markers. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 102, 1692–1701 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Iyengar, N. M. et al. Systemic correlates of white adipose tissue inflammation in early-stage breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 2283–2289 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hakulinen, T. Cancer survival corrected for heterogeneity in patient withdrawal. Biometrics 38, 933–942 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Almekinders, M. M. et al. Metadata supporting the article: Breast Adipocyte Size associates with Ipsilateral Invasive Breast Cancer Risk after DuctalCarcinoma in Situ. figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13580531 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Grand Challenge PRECISION (PREvent ductal Carcinoma In Situ Invasive Overtreatment Now) Consortium is recipient of the Cancer Research UK Grand Challenge Award 2017, jointly funded by Cancer Research UK and Dutch Cancer Society (KWF) [grant numbers C38317, A24043]. The study was also supported by Pink Ribbon [grant number 2013.WO29], A Sisters Hope [grantnumber2011.WO19.C88] and the Luxemburg Cancer Foundation [FC/2018/07 to C.D.].

We acknowledge the NKI-AVL Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking (CFMPB) including D. Peters for supplying NKI-AVL Biobank material and their lab support. We are grateful to W. Tong for his assistance in statistical analysis.

Prior presentation

Part of this work has been presented at the annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in December 2019 (Almekinders et al. # P6-15-07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Conception and study design: M.M.A., M.S., C.D. and J.W. Development of methodology: M.M.A. and M.S. Acquisition of data: M.M.A, L.L.V., J.S. and I.H. Analysis and interpretation of data: M.M.A, M.S., B.T, L.L.V, T.B, L.F.A.W, E.H.L., C.D. and J.W. Writing and review of the manuscript: M.M.A, M.S., C.D. and J.W. Critical revision of the manuscript: all authors. Administrative, technical or material support: I.H., M.M., A.B. and E.H. Supervision: M.M.A., C.D. and J.W. Authors C.D. and J.W. contributed equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jelle Wesseling.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analyses and data interpretation, writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almekinders, M.M.M., Schaapveld, M., Thijssen, B. et al. Breast adipocyte size associates with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer risk after ductal carcinoma in situ. npj Breast Cancer 7, 31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00232-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-021-00232-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing