Abstract
Nanoscale electron transfer (ET) in solids is fundamental to the design of multifunctional nanomaterials, yet its process is not fully understood. Herein, through X-ray crystallography, we directly observe solid-state ET via a crystal-to-crystal process. We first demonstrate the creation of a robust and flexible electron acceptor/acceptor (A/A) double-wall nanotube crystal ([(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n) with a large window (0.90 nm × 0.92 nm) through the one-dimensional porous crystallization of heteroleptic Zn4 metallocycles ((Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4) with two different acceptor ligands (2,7-bis((1-ethyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)ethynyl)acridine (LA) and 2,7-bis((1-ethyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)ethynyl)acridin-9(10H)-one (LA=O)) in a slow-oxidation-associated crystallization procedure. We then achieve the bottom-up construction of the electron donor incorporated-A/A nanotube crystal ([(D)2⊂(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n) through the subsequent absorption of electron donor guests (D = tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) and ferrocene (Fc)). Finally, we remove electrons from the electron donor guests inside the nanotube crystal through facile ET in the solid state to accumulate holes inside the nanotube crystal ([(D•+)2⊂(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n), where the solid-state ET process (D – e– → D•+) is thus observed directly by X-ray crystallography.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nanoscale electron transfer (ET) in solids is fundamental to the design of multifunctional nanomaterials1,2, yet its process is insufficiently understood3,4. Among nanomaterials, nanotubes are a fascinating nanomaterial owing to their unique structures5,6,7, which offer a variety of unique electronic states through electron and hole injection to accumulate electrons and holes in the nanotubes8,9. Despite their fascinating ET properties, carbon-based nanotube materials are difficult to control in terms of their size and shape owing to their extreme synthesis conditions, such as high temperatures. Conversely, a viable strategy for fabricating well-defined nanotubes with high tunability is a bottom-up construction of non-covalent nanotubes through the infinite one-dimensional (1D) columnar organization of organic10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 or metallic macrocycles22,23,24,25,26,27,28, which sometimes offers crystalline-form nanotube materials. However, non-covalent nanotube crystals are not robust enough to be subjected to electron and hole injection, as these ET events generate active radical sites on the building constituents and can break the non-covalent interactions and destroy the crystalline state. Therefore, if one could succeed in the bottom-up construction of robust and flexible non-covalent nanotube crystals such that hole or electron accumulation occurs through a crystal-to-crystal process, the direct observation of thermal ET in solids through X-ray crystallography would be possible. Direct ET observation through X-ray crystallography has greatly benefited various fields in science, yet its success has been limited in the observation of the photo-induced charge separation process without stoichiometric changes29,30,31.
Herein, we demonstrate a direct observation of the solid-state ET based on X-ray crystallography through a crystal-to-crystal process of hole accumulation in electron-acceptor/acceptor (A/A) multi-wall nanotube crystal incorporating electron-donor guests (D = tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) and ferrocene (Fc)). First, we present the creation of an A/A double-wall nanotube crystal using a novel supramolecular crystallization method involving slow oxidation32 associated crystallization, by which controlled crystallization of heteroleptic33 Zn4 metallocycles having a double-wall structure into a 1D porous framework is achieved (Fig. 1a–c). Owing to its unique double-wall structure with large windows (0.90 nm × 0.92 nm), the resulting Zn4n double-wall nanotube crystal ([(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n) is robust and flexible enough to maintain its crystalline state upon ET oxidation processes. The A/A double-wall nanotube crystal is capable of absorbing electron donors, whereas the crystal-to-crystal bottom-up construction of a double-wall nanotube crystal incorporating electron donor guests ([(D)2⊂(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n) is made possible by the subsequent absorption of D at the crystalline state (Fig. 1d)34. Electrons can be removed from the inner electron donors by facile ET in the solid state to accumulate holes inside the nanotube crystal ([(D)2⊂(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n – 2ne– → [(D•+)2⊂(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n), whereas the nanotube crystal maintains the crystalline state (Fig. 1d). Thus, surprisingly, the thermal ET process in solids (D – e– → D•+) can be directly observed by X-ray crystallography.
Results and discussion
Electron-donor incorporated double-wall nanotube crystal
A new acridine ligand (LA) acting as an electron acceptor was designed and synthesized in accordance with imidazole-based ditopic ligands developed in our supramolecular systems (Fig. 1e)35,36,37. Self-assembly of the homoleptic and heteroleptic double-wall Zn4 metallocycles [respectively (Zn2+)4(LA)8 and (Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4] in solution was investigated by adopting nuclear magnetic resonance and electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (Supplementary Note 2; Supplementary Figs. 1–6).
Slow diffusion of 1,4-dioxane into an acetonitrile solution containing (Zn2+)4(LA)8 gave crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Notes 3 and 4; Supplementary Figs. 7–13), which revealed 1D porous double-wall nanotubes ([(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n) formed by the infinite 1D columnar stacking of (Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4. The heteroleptic Zn4 host frame ((Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4) comprised two acridine dimer stacking units and two acridone dimer stacking units, where each dimer stacking unit was twisted; specifically, M-helicity for the acridine dimers and P-helicity for the acridone dimers (Fig. 2d). Hence, the obtained double-wall nanotubes had chirality38, where the enantiomers (i.e., [MMPP-(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n and [PPMM-(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n) were stacked with each other in the crystal packing structure (Supplementary Fig. 14).
In the present study, we used ferrocene (Fc) and tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) (Fig. 1f) as prototypical electron donors to assess the viability of the electron-donor incorporation method for the double-wall nanotube at the crystalline state (Supplementary Notes 5 and 6; Supplementary Figs. 15–20; Supplementary Table 1), wherein both Fc and TTF could enter the Zn4 host frame window (0.90 nm × 0.92 nm; Supplementary Figs. 21 and 22). Soaking the double-wall nanotube crystals ([(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n) in acetonitrile/1,4-dioxane (1:2, v/v) containing Fc or TTF for 7 days resulted in crystal color changes (Fig. 2a), indicating absorption of the guest molecules39,40,41. However, the crystals maintained their crystalline states and no appreciable shape change was observed in the Zn4 host frame after absorption of the electron donors (Supplementary Fig. 25). Electron density maps (Fo) from the X-ray diffraction analysis of the Fc- and TTF-soaked crystals revealed new electron densities in the cavities of the Zn4 host frame (Fig. 2c). The distributions of these new electron densities agreed well with those of Fc and TTF, as calculated adopting density functional theory (Fig. 2b). X-ray structural analysis of the Fc- and TTF-soaked crystals revealed that the absorbed Fc and TTF were aligned in one direction along the inner channel cavity (Fig. 2e, f; Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). A maximum of two Fc or TTF guests could be stored per Zn4 host frame (Supplementary Figs. 23–26), and the chirality of the Zn4 host frame was successfully transferred to the arrangement of the absorbed guests; i.e., P- and M-helicity was imparted by the PPMM- and MMPP-(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4 host frames, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 27).
Direct observation of thermal ET in solids through X-ray crystallography
Then, we investigated the direct observation of the thermal ET in solids using the above TTF- and Fc-incorporated double-wall nanotube crystals through X-ray crystallography. TTF and Fc have low one-electron oxidation potential and are suitable for facial ET oxidation by [Fe(H2O)6](ClO4)3 (Supplementary Fig. 28)42,43. Upon surface contact with the [Fe(H2O)6](ClO4)3 solids, there are gradual changes from the yellow color of the TTF- and Fc- incorporated nanotube crystals to the dark brown color of TTF radical cation (TTF•+) and the dark color of ferrocenium ion (Fc+), respectively (Fig. 3a, b; see Supplementary Movies 1 and 2). Furthermore, the TTF-incorporated nanotube crystals exhibited an intense electron spin resonance signal due to TTF•+ after the ET oxidation (Supplementary Fig. 29). It is noteworthy that such remarkable color change of the crystal could not be observed for the electron-donor unoccupied nanotube crystal (i.e., [(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4]n) upon surface contact with the [Fe(H2O)6](ClO4)3 solid (Fig. 3c; see Supplementary Movie 3). Thus, the color changes observed for the TTF- and Fc-incorporated nanotube crystals (Fig. 3a, b) are attributed to the ET oxidation of the inner donor guests to accumulate holes inside the nanotube (Fig. 1d). Surprisingly, both TTF- and Fc-incorporated nanotube crystals maintained crystalline states during the ET oxidation (Supplementary Fig. 30), and we thus performed the X-ray structural analysis of the nanotube crystals after the ET oxidation. The X-ray structural analysis revealed that the acridine ligands of the host frame were almost fully oxidized to acridone in the generation of a homoleptic Zn4 host frame [(Zn2+)4(LA)4(LA=O)4 → (Zn2+)4(LA=O)8] after the ET oxidation (Fig. 3e, f; Supplementary Figs. 31–35; Supplementary Tables 4–6), while no appreciable shape change (e.g., Zn-Zn distances) was observed in the Zn4 host frame (Supplementary Figs. 36–38). Moreover, two ClO4– newly appeared close to the inner TTF and Fc guests (Fig. 3e, f; Supplementary Figs. 39 and 40). The additional ClO4– molecules originated from the counter anion of [Fe(H2O)6](ClO4)3 used as the oxidant, which compensated the additional positive charge in the nanotube crystal generated by the ET oxidation. In addition, after the ET oxidation, the two inner TTF guests moved toward the closest OTf– molecules to generate hydrogen bonds between the terminal hydrogen atoms of TTF and the F atoms of the OTf– molecules (dH–F = 2.572 Å, Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 41; see Supplementary Movie 4). An electrostatic potential map of TTF•+ suggests that the terminal hydrogen atoms were most positively charged (Fig. 3d), which explains the observed movement of the inner TTF molecules by the ET oxidation. Intriguingly, the positions of the two inner TTF molecules changed from the twisted conformation to the parallel conformation after the ET oxidation (θ = 66.4° → 11.8°); therefore, the chirality was almost lost in the arrangement of the two TTF guests (Fig. 3e). In contrast, only a slight positional change (θ = 60.7° → 57.4°) was observed for the Fc guests after the ET oxidation (Fig. 3f; see Supplementary Movie 5). Fc+ has no acidic hydrogen atom to form a hydrogen bond with the F atom of the OTf– molecule (Fig. 3d), thus no significant positional change can be expected before and after the ET oxidation of the inner Fc guests. Conversely, the two ClO4– molecules that appeared after the ET oxidation were located at the more inner regions of the Zn4-host frame than that of the TTF-incorporated nanotube crystals (Fig. 3f vs. e), which should be attributed to the high positive charge of the central Fe3+ of the inner Fc+ guests (Fig. 3d). Although the detailed solid-state ET mechanism in this system is still unclear at present, the tubular void with a large window (0.90 nm × 0.92 nm) should play an important role in delivering the additional ClO4– and holes generated at the surface into the depths of the tube (Supplementary Note 7; Supplementary Figs. 43–45). This is fundamentally different from the crystal-to-crystal transition of the redox-responsive metal-organic-frameworks (MOF) (Supplementary Fig. 46)44,45,46.
Since the above X-ray crystallography method can directly determine the initial and the final structures of the solid-state ET process (Fig. 3e, f), this opens a way for direct determination of the reorganization energy (λ) of the thermal ET in solids within the framework of the Marcus-Hush two-state model (Supplementary Note 8; Supplementary Figs. 42 and 43)47,48,49. The present analysis revealed unusually large λ values for the solid-state ET oxidation of TTF and Fc inside the nanotube (1.36 and 2.23 eV, respectively). Such large λ values are mostly attributed to the incoming ClO4– molecules to compensate for the additional positive charge on the electron donor molecules after the ET oxidation. Such large λ normally decelerates the ET rate, and thus the findings give a convincing explanation for the fact that the solid-state ET system is still quite rare. An efficient ET in solids should be rather rigid showing only small composition changes in response to the oxidation/reduction, like typical ET of biological cofactors50.
This result is a striking example of the direct observation of a thermal ET process in solids through X-ray crystallography and demonstrates that the scope of the proposed method can be expanded to cover ET events in nanomaterials. A variety of solid-state ET processes can be investigated in a similar way.
Methods
General methods
1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured with JEOL JNM-ECZ400S, JNM-ECA500 and Bruker AVANCE NEO 400. UV-Vis absorption spectra were recorded by a JASCO V-660 at ambient temperature. High-resolution electrospray ionization (HR-ESI) mass spectra were measured with mass spectrometers X500R QTOF (Sciex, MA, USA). DFT studies were performed with the GAUSSIAN ’09 package. The atomic coordinate files after DFT calculations are included as Supplementary Data files 1–12.
Synthesis and characterization
2,7-Bis((1-ethyl-1H-imidazol-2-yl)ethynyl)acridine (LA)
To a two-necked flask, CuI (176 mg, 0.928 mmol), 2,7-bis(ethynyltrimethylsilane)acridine (3.45 g, 9.28 mmol), 1-ethyl-2-iodo-1H-imidazole (5.15 g, 23.2 mmol), THF (80 mL), and triethylamine (60 mL) were added. After the solution was degassed by bubbling with Ar gas for 30 min, tetrabutylammonium fluoride (in tetrahydrofuran 1 mol/L, 27.8 mL) and Pd(PPh3)4 (1.07 g, 0.928 mmol) were added to the flask. Then, the reaction mixture was refluxed under an Ar atmosphere for 24 h. The filtrate was extracted with chloroform. The organic phase was consecutively washed with water and then brine. It was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent was evaporated, the crude product was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel (chloroform/methanol = 9/1) and purified by GPC with chloroform to afford a yellow solid (1.26 g, 32.7%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, 298 K, CD3CN) δ 8.94 (s, 1H), 8.41 (s, 2H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.93 (dd, J = 8.9, 1.7 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (s, 2H), 7.06 (s, 2H), 4.24 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 1.48 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, 298 K, CDCl3) δ 148.59, 135.79, 132.55, 131.94, 131.12, 130.10, 129.74, 126.27, 119.88, 119.78, 92.18, 80.63, 41.95, 16.07 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C27H21N5 + H]+: 416.18752; found: 416.18681. Synthesis and characterization details can be found in the Supplementary Note 1.
X-ray crystallographic analysis
X-ray diffraction data were collected on Bruker-AXS・D8 QUEST using microfocus MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) equipped with a CCD detector. All data collection strategies were performed at 90 K using cold nitrogen streams. X-ray crystallographic analysis details can be found in the Supplementary Note 1. Cif files and checkcif files are included as Supplementary Data files 13-24.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The X-ray data have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) under reference numbers 2262473–2262475; 2298311–2298313. All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Junpei Yuasa (e-mail: yuasaj@rs.tus.ac.jp.).
References
Pal, S. K. et al. Resonating valence-bond ground state in a phenalenyl-based neutral radical conductor. Science 309, 281–284 (2005).
Raman, K. V. et al. Interface-engineered templates for molecular spin memory devices. Nature 493, 509–513 (2013).
Sui, Q. et al. Effects of different counter anions on solid-state electron transfer in viologen compounds: modulation of color and piezo- and photochromic properties. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 9282–9288 (2020).
Biswas, A., Bhunia, A. & Mandal, S. K. Mechanochemical solid state single electron transfer from reduced organic hydrocarbon for catalytic aryl-halide bond activation. Chem. Sci. 14, 2606–2615 (2023).
Iijima, S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Science 354, 56–58 (1991).
Baughman, R. H., Zakhidov, A. A. & de Heer, W. A. Carbon nanotubes—the route toward applications. Science 297, 787–792 (2002).
Xia, Y. et al. One-dimensional nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv. Mater. 15, 353–389 (2003).
Kazemi, S., Jang, Y., Liyanage, A., Karr, P. A. & D’Souza, F. A Carbon nanotube binding BODIPY-C60 nano tweezer: charge stabilization through sequential electron transfer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202212474 (2022).
Yang, L. et al. Boron-doped carbon nanotubes as metal-free electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 7132–7135 (2011).
Bong, D. T., Clark, T. D., Granja, J. R. & Ghadiri, M. R. Self-assembling organic nanotubes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 988–1011 (2001).
Ghadiri, M. R., Granja, J. R., Milligan, R. A., McRee, D. E. & Khazanovich, N. Self-assembling organic nanotubes based on a cyclic peptide architecture. Nature 366, 324–327 (1993).
Zhang, J. & Moore, J. S. Aggregation of hexa(phenylacetylene) macrocycles in solution: a model system for studying π-π interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 9701–9702 (1992).
Leonhardt, E. J. et al. A bottom-up approach to solution-processed, atomically precise graphitic cylinders on graphite. Nano Lett. 18, 7991–7997 (2018).
Strauss, M. J. et al. Divergent nanotube synthesis through reversible macrocycle assembly. Acc. Mater. Res. 3, 935–947 (2022).
Mao, L. et al. Highly efficient synthesis of non-planar macrocycles possessing intriguing self-assembling behaviors and ethene/ethyne capture properties. Nat. Commun. 11, 5806 (2020).
Nagai, A. et al. Pore surface engineering in covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2, 536 (2011).
Venkataraman, D., Lee, S., Zhang, J. & Moore, J. S. An organic solid with wide channels based on hydrogen bonding between macrocycles. Nature 371, 591–593 (1994).
Yang, Y. et al. Strong aggregation and directional assembly of aromatic oligoamide macrocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18590–18593 (2011).
Zhong, Y. et al. Enforced tubular assembly of electronically different hexakis(m-phenylene ethynylene) macrocycles: persistent columnar stacking driven by multiple hydrogen-bonding interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 15950–15957 (2017).
Hsu, T.-J., Fowler, F. W. & Lauher, J. W. Preparation and structure of a tubular addition polymer: a true synthetic nanotube. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 142–145 (2012).
Chen, L. et al. Luminescent metallacycle-cored liquid crystals induced by metal coordination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 10143–10150 (2020).
Chatterjee, B. et al. Self-assembly of flexible supramolecular metallacyclic ensembles: structures and adsorption properties of their nanoporous crystalline frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10645–10656 (2004).
Dobrzańska, L., Lloyd, G. O., Raubenheimer, H. G. & Barbour, L. J. A discrete metallocyclic complex that retains its solvent-templated channel structure on guest removal to yield a porous, gas sorbing material. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 13134–13135 (2005).
Zasada, L. B. et al. Conjugated metal−organic macrocycles: synthesis, characterization, and electrical conductivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 4515–4521 (2022).
Dobrzańska, L., Lloyd, G. O., Raubenheimer, H. G. & Barbour, L. J. Permeability of a seemingly nonporous crystal formed by a discrete metallocyclic complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 698–699 (2006).
Frischmann, P. D., Guieu, S. G., Tabeshi, R. & MacLachlan, M. J. Columnar organization of head-to-tail self-assembled Pt4 rings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 7668–7675 (2010).
Otsubo, K. et al. Bottom-up realization of a porous metal–organic nanotubular assembly. Nat. Mater. 10, 291–295 (2011).
Slater, A. G. et al. Reticular synthesis of porous molecular 1D nanotubes and 3D networks. Nat. Chem. 9, 17–25 (2017).
Wöhri, A. B. et al. Light-induced structural changes in a photosynthetic reaction center caught by laue diffraction. Science 328, 630–633 (2010).
Stowell, M. H. B. et al. Light-induced structural changes in photosynthetic reaction center: implications for mechanism of electron-proton transfer. Science 276, 812–816 (1997).
Hoshino, M. et al. Determination of the structural features of a long-lived electron-transfer state of 9-mesityl-10-methylacridinium ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 4569–4572 (2012).
Yu, J., Yang, H., Jiang, Y. & Fu, H. Copper-catalyzed aerobic oxidative C–H and C–C functionalization of 1-[2-(Arylamino)aryl]ethanones leading to acridone derivatives. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 4271–4277 (2013).
Tessarolo, J., Lee, H., Sakuda, E., Umakoshi, K. & Clever, G. H. Integrative assembly of heteroleptic tetrahedra controlled by backbone steric bulk. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 6339–6344 (2021).
Inokuma, Y. et al. X-ray analysis on the nanogram to microgram scale using porous complexes. Nature 495, 461–466 (2013).
Hamashima, K. & Yuasa, J. Entropy versus enthalpy controlled temperature/redox dual-triggered cages for selective anion encapsulation and release. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202113914 (2022).
Iseki, S., Nonomura, K., Kishida, S., Ogata, D. & Yuasa, J. Zinc-ion-stabilized charge-transfer interactions drive self-complementary or complementary molecular recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 15842–15851 (2020).
Ogata, D. & Yuasa, J. Dynamic open coordination cage from nonsymmetrical imidazole-pyridine ditopic ligands for turn-on/off anion binding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 18424–18428 (2019).
Chamorro, P. B. & Aparicio, F. Chiral nanotubes self-assembled from discrete non-covalent macrocycles. Chem. Commun. 57, 12712–12724 (2021).
Dewal, M. B. et al. Absorption properties of a porous organic crystalline apohost formed by a self-assembled bis-urea macrocycle. Chem. Mater. 18, 4855–4864 (2006).
Dawn, S. et al. Self-assembled phenylethynylene bis-urea macrocycles facilitate the selective photodimerization of coumarin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 7025–7032 (2011).
Jacobs, T. et al. In situ X-ray structural studies of a flexible host responding to incremental gas loading. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 4913–4916 (2012).
Iyoda, M., Hasegawa, M. & Enozawa, M. Self-assembly and nanostructure formation of multi-functional organic π-donors. Chem. Lett. 36, 1402–1407 (2007).
Bhatta, S. R., Bheemireddy, V. & Thakur, A. A redox-driven fluorescence “off−on” molecular switch based on a 1,1′-unsymmetrically substituted ferrocenyl coumarin system: mimicking combinational logic operation. Organometallics 36, 829–838 (2017).
Choi, H. J. & Suh, M. P. Dynamic and redox active pillared bilayer open framework: single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformations upon guest removal, guest exchange, and framework oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 15844–15851 (2004).
Su, J. et al. Redox activities of metal–organic frameworks incorporating rare-earth metal chains and tetrathiafulvalene linkers. Inorg. Chem. 58, 3698–3706 (2019).
Su, J. et al. Redox-switchable breathing behavior in tetrathiafulvalene-based metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 8, 2008 (2017).
Marcus, R. A. On the theory of oxidation-reduction reactions involving electron transfer. I. J. Chem. Phys. 24, 966–978 (1956).
Hush, N. S. Adiabatic theory of outer sphere electron-transfer reactions in solution. Trans. Faraday Soc. 57, 557–580 (1961).
Deng, W.-Q. & Goddard, W. A. Predictions of hole mobilities in oligoacene organic semiconductors from quantum mechanical calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108, 8614–8621 (2004).
Blumberger, J. Recent advances in the theory and molecular simulation of biological electron transfer reactions. Chem. Rev. 115, 11191–11238 (2015).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Jay Freeman at Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript. This work was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI under grant numbers JP23H01941 (J.Y.) and JP23H0397 (J.Y.) (Scientific Research on Innovative Areas, Dynamic Exciton) and JP21J20598 (D.O.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.O., H.K. and K.S. performed the synthesis and characterization of materials. D.O. and H.K. analyzed the experimental data, including the X-ray crystal structures. J.Y. designed the study, analyzed the experimental data, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ogata, D., Koide, S., Kishi, H. et al. Direct observation of electron transfer in solids through X-ray crystallography. Nat Commun 15, 4412 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48599-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48599-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.