Abstract
Rapidly renewable tissues adapt different strategies to cope with environmental insults. While tissue repair is associated with increased intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation and accelerated tissue turnover rates, reduced calorie intake triggers a homeostasis-breaking process causing adaptive resizing of the gut. Here we show that activins are key drivers of both adaptive and regenerative growth. Activin-β (Actβ) is produced by stem and progenitor cells in response to intestinal infections and stimulates ISC proliferation and turnover rates to promote tissue repair. Dawdle (Daw), a divergent Drosophila activin, signals through its receptor, Baboon, in progenitor cells to promote their maturation into enterocytes (ECs). Daw is dynamically regulated during starvation-refeeding cycles, where it couples nutrient intake with progenitor maturation and adaptive resizing of the gut. Our results highlight an activin-dependent mechanism coupling nutrient intake with progenitor-to-EC maturation to promote adaptive resizing of the gut and further establish activins as key regulators of adult tissue plasticity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Adult tissues with high turnover rates depend on stem cells (SCs) to provide a continuous source of differentiated cells to maintain tissue homeostasis. Adaptation of organ size and physiology to internal or environmental cues involves adjustments of divisions and fate decisions to maintain tissue integrity and ensure organism health and reproductivity. Due to a high level of conservation of both structure, physiology, and the gene-regulatory network controlling ISC activity, the Drosophila midgut has proven a powerful model for dissecting the molecular mechanisms underlying adult SC activity and fate decisions1,2. Drosophila ISCs are embedded basally throughout the gut epithelium and divide non-symmetrically to give rise to a daughter ISCs and transient progenitor cells, enteroblasts (EBs) or EE progenitor cells (EEPs), that are destined to differentiate into ECs or EE cells (EECs), respectively3,4,5,6,7. In homeostatic conditions, the majority of ISCs undergo asymmetric divisions giving rise to one ISC (self-renewal) and one daughter cell committed to differentiate into an EB (90%) or pre-EEC (10%) ensuring a constant pool of progenitor cells6,8. By contrast, adaptive growth, which can be triggered by anticipatory internal signals, e.g., following mating9,10,11, or environmental cues, is characterized by accelerated ISC division rates and a shift from asymmetric to symmetric ISC divisions12. One striking example of adaptive growth is the shrinkage and expansion of the gut in response to cycles of starvation and refeeding, which has been observed in a wide range of organisms12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Widespread damage and severe intestinal infections also trigger a switch in division mode towards symmetric divisions to ensure rapid replacement of lost ECs19,20,21. To identify niche-derived signals controlling ISC division rates and/or fate decisions in conditions associated with accelerated tissue turnover rates, we used RNAis to knock down all secreted peptides (approx. 800) in different populations of the ISC niche and screened for reduced survival to enteric infection. Strikingly, among the top candidate hits, we identified two ligands belonging to the activin branch of the TGF-β superfamily, Actβ and Daw, and their inhibitor, Follistatin (FS), suggesting a key role of activin signaling in controlling ISC activity and fate decisions.
The architecture of the Activin signaling pathway is highly conserved between flies and mammals22. In mammals, activins and Nodal share the same receptors and effectors, and hence, the pathway is often referred to as the Nodal/Activin pathway. Binding of Nodal/Activin growth factors to two type II activin receptors (Activin receptor type IIA/B (ActRIIA/B)) results in the recruitment, phosphorylation, and activation of two type I activin receptors (Activin receptor-like kinase 4 and 7 (ALK4 or ALK7)), which subsequently triggers the phosphorylation of receptor-regulated Suppressor of Mother against Decapentaplegic (R-Smads) 2 and 3. Phosphorylated R-Smads associate with the Co-Smad, Smad 4, and translocate into the nucleus to regulate the expression of broad range of genes in a tissue-specific and context-dependent manner23. In much the same way, binding of Drosophila activins to a single type I receptor, Baboon (Babo), promotes the assembly of heteromeric type I/type II (Punt/Wishful thinking) receptor complexes triggering phosphorylation of the downstream activin-specific R-Smad-related protein, Smad on X (Smox), which together with the Co-Smad, Medea, translocates to the nucleus to regulate gene expression22,24. Alternative splicing of babo gives rise to three isoforms, Babo-A, Babo-B, and Babo-C, that differ in their extracellular domain, and hence their affinity for the three related activin ligands, Actβ, Daw, and Myoglianin (Myo)24,25. Daw, which is a divergent paralogue of Actβ more related to vertebrate TGFβ1, signals exclusively through Babo-C in vitro25, whereas both Myo and Actβ was reported to utilize Babo-A26,27,28. For now, a clear relationship between Babo-B and one or more activins has not been established. Activin signaling is further regulated by the highly conserved secreted antagonist FS, which inhibits ligand/receptor interactions in both flies and mammals.
While the role of activin signaling in progenitor expansion and cell specification during early development and organogenesis is well established in both flies and mammals23,24,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39, its function in adult tissues is not well understood. For instance, Activin B/ActRIB signaling promotes stemness of hair follicle SCs in the skin40, while neutralization of Activin A by the activin antagonist, FS, is required to maintain the proliferative potential of ΔNp63+ stem- and progenitor cells in mouse salivary glands41. In flies, FS is required in testicular somatic cyst SCs (CySCs) to maintain niche quiescence, as loss of FS in CySCs or ectopic activation of activin signaling in hub (niche) cells results in their transdifferentiation into CySCs and a loss of niche capacity42. It is not clear whether the opposing outcomes of activin signaling on SCs self-renewal and differentiation reflect tissue-specific requirements. Nevertheless, mutations affecting Activin/Nodal signaling are frequent in cancer stem cells (CSCs) in a variety of tissues43,44,45, suggesting a broader role of activins in regulating SC fate decisions in adult tissues.
Here we show that activin signaling is instrumental in coordinating ISC proliferation and fate decisions in both homeostatic conditions and during regenerative/adaptive growth. While Actβ signals through Babo-A in ISCs to promote their self-renewal and differentiation into EBs, Daw/Babo-C signaling is required in EBs for their maturation into ECs. Actβ is produced by EBs in response to intestinal infections and required for tissue repair, while Daw expression is dynamically regulated by nutrient intake and plays a key role in the adaptive resizing of the gut during cycles of starvation and refeeding by controlling EB maturation and tissue turnover rates.
Results
Activin signaling regulates homeostatic gut epithelial turnover rates
While activins have essential functions during early development in mammals, their function in most adult tissue including the gut has not been studied. To investigate how activin signaling might regulate tissue turnover in the adult gut, we analyzed the expression pattern of the activin type I receptor, Babo, using a babo > UAS-GFP reporter and endogenously GFP-tagged Babo (Babo::GFP). We found that babo is broadly expressed, but enriched in ISCs and EBs (Fig. 1a–c and Supplementary Fig. 1a, a″). To analyze whether activin signaling is required to sustain tissue turnover in homeostatic conditions, we knocked down Babo and its downstream effector Smox in progenitor cells and monitored the effect on gut size (Fig. 1d–g) and numbers of newly generated ECs using a Repressible Dual Differential stability cell Marker (ReDDM) line (Fig. 1h–l)46. The ReDDM system labels progenitor cells (ISCs/EBs) with long-lived Histone (His) 2B-RFP and a short-lived GFP, while newly generated ECs are only positive for His-2B-RFP that remains stable for 28 days after its expression is turned off in ECs (Fig. 1h). Knockout of either Babo or Smox reduced gut size (Fig. 1d–g) and knockdown slowed down the production of ECs, demonstrating that activin signaling is required in progenitor cells to maintain tissue turnover rates in homeostatic conditions (Fig. 1d–l). Consistent with this, ectopic expression of a constitutively active form of Smox in progenitor cells was sufficient to trigger ISC proliferation and accelerate tissue turnover (Fig. 1m–o′).
Babo-A and Babo-C regulates different steps of ISC-to-EC differentiation
The babo gene encodes three different isoforms that differ in their extracellular domains and affinity for the three activin ligands. While Babo-C is thought to bind Daw, Babo-A was reported to mediate both Myo and Actβ signaling25,26,27,28. To analyze the role of each of these isoforms in regulating ISC-driven tissue turnover, we first analyzed their expression patterns. While isoforms A and C were expressed at intermediate and high levels, respectively, isoform B expression was hardly detectable in the gut (Fig. 2a). Knockdown of Babo-C reduced the number of ECs produced over time, showing that it is required for ISC proliferation and/or differentiation into ECs (Fig. 2b,d–e′, Supplementary Fig. 1b″). By contrast, Babo-A and Babo-B knockdown did not affect tissue turnover rates in homeostatic conditions, although Babo-A knockdown caused a significant reduction in the stem and progenitor pool (Fig. 2b, c, e, e′ and Supplementary Fig. 1b, b′). To analyze how Babo-A, Babo-B, and Babo-C depletion affects ISC differentiation we made use of a cell fate sensor (Cfsts) line allowing us to monitor the sizes of the ISC, EB and EC populations over time (Fig. 2f; ref. 47). Strikingly, knockdown of Babo-A resulted in a depletion of EBs, while the ISC pool remained stable (Fig. 2g–i″), suggesting that Babo-A regulates the maturation of ISCs into EBs. While Babo-B depletion did not affect the sizes of gut resident populations (Fig. 2g, g″′), knockdown of Babo-C in ISCs/EBs caused an accumulation of both ISCs and EBs suggesting a defect in the maturation of EBs to ECs (Fig. 2g–h″, j, j″). Indeed, EB-specific Babo-C depletion triggered an accumulation of EBs, showing that Babo-C is required in EBs to promote their maturation into ECs (Fig. 2k, m, n). Consistent with Babo-C, and not Babo-A, signaling being rate limiting for tissue turnover rates in homeostatic conditions (Fig. 2b–e′), knockdown of all three iso-forms resulted in an accumulation of EBs (Supplementary Fig. 1c–e′). As expected, knockdown of Babo-A in ISCs, but not EBs, reduced EBs numbers (Fig. 2k–l, n–q). Hence, Babo-A and Babo-C display different expression patterns and control different steps of ISC to EC differentiation.
Actβ/Babo-A signaling promotes regenerative growth
The role of activin signaling in regenerative growth has not been investigated in neither the mammalian or fly gut. We therefore tested how tissue repair triggered by oral infection is affected by ISC/EB-specific Babo knockdown. Knockdown of all three Babo isoforms significantly reduced the infection-induced ISC proliferative response (Fig. 3a, b) and led to a decrease in organism viability after oral infection of mated female flies with the pathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas entomophila (Pe; Fig. 3c). The reduced regenerative response was recapitulated by ISC/EB-specific knockdown of Babo-A, but not Babo-B or Babo-C (Fig. 3d, e). Using the cell fate sensor, we further showed that knockdown of Babo-A in progenitor cells specifically reduces the number of EBs, whereas ISC numbers are slightly increased compared with infected control guts (Fig. 3f–h′). Altogether, this is consistent with a key role of Babo-A in promoting ISC divisions and ISC-to-EB differentiation. Babo-A was previously reported to function as a receptor for both Actβ and Myo. However, while Actβ expression was strongly upregulated in response to oral infection (Fig. 3i), the expression of Myo was only moderately increased (Supplementary Fig. 2a), suggesting that Actβ might be the principal driver of regenerative growth. We also observed an intermediate up-regulation of Daw 16 hours after infection (Supplementary Fig. 2a′). In homeostatic conditions, Actβ expression is detected exclusively in EECs (Fig. 3j, j″; ref. 27) but its expression is triggered in EBs in response to oral infections by the mildly pathogenic, Erwinia carotovora carotovora 15 (Ecc15) and the highly virulent Pe (Fig. 3k–m″). This is consistent with RNAseq data on FACS sorted gut cells showing a 100-fold upregulation of Actβ in EBs in response to oral Pe infection48. In accordance with EBs being the main source of Actβ fueling regenerative growth, we found that knockdown of Actβ in EBs, but not ISCs, EECs or ECs, significantly reduced the proliferative response (Fig. 3n, Supplementary Fig. 2b–e). Of note, knocking down Act-β in both ISC and EBs more efficiently suppressed the proliferative response to intestinal infections than EB-specific Act-β knockdown, suggesting that ISCs might constitute an additional source of Act-β (Fig. 3o–q). Consistent with this, Act-β was also upregulated in ISCs following Pe and Ecc15 infections (Fig. 3m′). Likewise, knockdown of Babo-A diminished the progenitor pool in conditions of infection-induced regenerative growth and reduced tissue turnover rates (Fig. 3r, s, u, u′). Consistent with the role of Babo-C in promoting EB-to-EC maturation, knockdown of Babo-C increased the progenitor pool (Fig. 3u′) and suppressed EC replenishment in both homeostatic conditions and during tissue repair (Figs. 2e and 3r, t–u′). In agreement with a role of activin signaling in promoting tissue repair, ISC/EB-specific knockdown of Babo-A or EB-specific knockdown of Actβ reduced the resistance of mated female flies to oxidative stress (Supplementary Fig. 2f–g).
Many signals that stimulate proliferation and tissue repair in young animals also contribute to aged-related dysplasia. To investigate how augmented levels of activin signaling might affect longevity, we knocked down the activin inhibitor, FS, which was reported to counteract activin signaling in both flies and mammals. We observed an increase in ISC proliferation upon EC-specific knockdown of FS in both young and old animals accompanied by a reduced lifespan of mated female flies (Supplementary Fig. 2h, i), suggesting that excess activin signaling might accelerate ageing-associated deterioration of the gut epithelium.
Daw/Babo-C signaling adapts gut size to nutrient availability
The adult gut is a plastic organ that undergoes resizing in response to certain environmental cues. Hence, it was shown that the cycles of starvation and refeeding causes the gut to shrink and regrow, respectively, in a wide range of organisms12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Previous studies in flies have demonstrated an essential role of the insulin-like molecule Dilp3 in driving progenitor and gut expansion following the first meals in newly eclosed flies12. By contrast, it is not clear how short cycles of intermittent feeding affects progenitor number in the mature gut nor how adaptive growth is regulated in this condition. We therefore applied cycles of 48 hours of starvation followed by 24 h of refeeding to 6-day-old virgins. Two days of starvation was sufficient to shrink the gut, while 24 hours of refeeding allowed the gut to reach its pre-starvation size (Fig. 4a, b). Interestingly, while 2 days of starvation decreased the total number of ECs, EECs, and ISCs, it increased EB numbers (Fig. 4c, c″′). This contrasts with prolonged starvation, which results in a loss of EBs and massive apoptosis12,17. While we could detect moderate levels of apoptosis in ECs, we did not observe significant levels of apoptosis in ISC/EBs following 48 hours of starvation, suggesting that EBs are only lost upon prolonged starvation (Fig. 4d, d″, Supplementary Fig. 3a, b″). The accumulation of EBs observed after 48 hours of starvation recapitulated the phenotype caused by EB-specific knockdown of Babo-C (Fig. 2n), and hence, to test whether activin signaling regulates nutrient-dependent adaptive growth, we next monitored the expression levels of activin ligands during cycles of starvation and refeeding. Strikingly, we found that Daw expression was strongly suppressed by starvation and reexpressed upon refeeding (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 3c–f). Although the expressions of both Actβ and Myo were slightly reduced upon nutrient deprivation, their expression levels were not restored upon refeeding (Supplementary Fig. 3g, h). Consistent with the role of Daw in coupling adaptive resizing of the gut with nutrient availability, knockdown of its receptor, Babo-C, in progenitor cells reduced tissue turnover (Fig. 4j–l), prevented normalization of EB numbers (Fig. 4f–h), and impaired resizing of the gut in refed animals (Fig. 4i). This suggests that starvation-mediated repression of Daw signaling might shrink the gut by preventing EB differentiation, while refeeding promotes Daw-dependent EB maturation and adaptive growth. Consistent with this, Daw is required in ECs, where it is also highly expressed (Supplementary Fig. 3f), to resize the gut following refeeding by permitting the accumulated pool of EBs to mature into ECs (Fig. 4m–p). Intermittent cycles of starvation might be a frequently occurring phenomenon in nature, and hence, loss of gut plasticity could have far-reaching consequences for survival. To test this, we subjected flies to repetitive cycles of fasting and refeeding and monitored survival. Indeed, knockdown of Babo-C in progenitor cells or Daw in ECs is sufficient to make mated female flies more sensitive to successive cycles of starvation/refeeding (Fig. 4q, r), demonstrating the physiological importance of Daw/Babo-C signaling in coupling nutrient intake with adaptive gut resizing. Altogether, our work establishes activins as key regulators of adult gut homeostasis and identifies a role of activins in coupling tissue turnover rates and organ size with environmental cues to promote resistance to pathogenic infections and fluctuations in nutrient availability (Fig. 4s).
Discussion
In mammals, the BMP branch of the TGF-β superfamily has a well-defined role in regulating intestinal homeostasis. BMP signaling exhibits a gradient along the crypt to villus axis. Low levels of BMP signaling at the bottom of the crypt is essential to promote Lgr5+ ISC self-renewal, while high levels of BMP suppress proliferation and prevents expansion of the Lgr5+ ISC population outside of the crypt49,50. The role of BMP/Dpp signaling in the fly gut is more complex, as different sources of Dpp was reported to promote20,51 or restrict52,53 regenerative growth. Interestingly, Ayyaz et al.51 reported that Smox, normally considered an activin-specific mediator, was required downstream of hemocyte-derived Dpp to trigger regenerative growth. This was contradicted by a more recent study showing that hemocytes are dispensable for proliferative response triggered by intestinal infection, bringing into question whether Dpp mediates Smox-dependent regenerative growth54. According to the data presented here, an alternative possibility is that Smox-dependent regenerative growth is triggered by activins.
The intense research put into deciphering the role of BMP signaling in maintaining gut homeostasis contrasts with a lack of studies addressing the function of nodal/activin signaling in the adult gut. Here we show that activin signaling plays a key role in regulating epithelial turnover rates in the gut by controlling ISC proliferation and fate choices. While Actβ signals through Babo-A to promote ISC self-renewal and their differentiation into EBs, Daw/Babo-C signaling is required in EBs for their maturation into ECs. Intestinal infections induce high levels of Actβ expression in EBs, where Actβ is required for the accelerated epithelial turnover rates associated with regenerative growth. Daw expression is also induced by oral infections, and consistent with this, Daw/Babo-C signaling is required in EBs to replenish the pool of ECs in this condition. Interestingly, Actβ produced by the PNS acts on the hematopoietic progenitors in hematopoietic pockets to stimulate their proliferation in larvae55. As the prime function of the PNS is to detect innocuous and noxious sensory stimuli, it is possible that activin signaling has a more general role in coupling harmful environmental cues with progenitor expansion to promote host defence. As mentioned before, Daw is related to vertebrate TGFβ1. In mammals, TGF-β/TβR1 signaling gradually increases from the crypt towards the tip of the villi with nuclear Smad3 being detectable in late TA and differentiated cells56. Based on in vitro and in vivo experiments, TGF-β is thought to promote terminal differentiation of ECs as these move out the crypt and up the villi57,58,59,60,61. Moreover, TGF-ß signaling is required for tissue repair, as epithelial wide inactivation of TβRII results in the accumulation of undifferentiated progenitor cells62. Our data suggest that the role of Daw/TGFß signaling in promoting terminal EC differentiation might be conserved between flies and mammals.
The rapid tissue turnover observed in mammalian guts is an energy expensive process, consuming up to 15% of the total basal metabolic rate63, and hence, during periods with reduced food intake, it is likely advantageous to reduce the total number of cells needing constant replenishment. Indeed, in both flies and mammals, prolonged periods of starvation can result in a reduction in gut size of up to 50%, which can be recovered following a few days of refeeding. In mammals, starvation slows down the proliferation in the transient amplifying region thereby reducing the number of epithelial cells, while +4 ISCs numbers and niche function is preserved64,65. This allows for rapid expansion of the epithelium upon refeeding. In flies, the expansion of progenitor cells in newly eclosed flies is triggered by food intake and mediated by the insulin-like molecule Dilp312. By contrast, it is not clear how adaptive growth is triggered during cycles of starvation-refeeding in mature guts. So far, most starvation-refeeding studies have been performed within 3 days of eclosion, when progenitor cells have not reached homeostatic numbers12,16, or involves prolonged periods of protein starvation of 7-15 days, which triggers high levels of apoptosis and dramatically reduces total numbers of EBs and ECs17. Importantly, as a proxy for intermittent feeding opportunities encountered by flies in the nature, it might be physiologically more relevant to study how shorter periods of starvation affects progenitor cell numbers. Here, we show that 24-48 hours of starvation, a condition that is not associated with massive cell death, results in an accumulation of EBs, despite a reduction in ECs and total number of cells. While the failure of EBs to differentiate into ECs results in shrinkage of the gut, it also generates a pool of poised EBs committed to promote adaptive growth upon refeeding. Indeed, EB numbers normalize shortly after refeeding, a process that depends on Daw/Babo-C signaling. Accordingly, Daw expression is strongly repressed upon nutrient deprivation, which likely restricts EB to EC differentiation, and reinduced upon refeeding. Altogether, this suggests that Daw/Babo-C signaling is essential for coupling adaptive resizing of the gut with nutrient intake. In mammals, nutrient restriction results in an accumulation of dormant ISCs (d-ISCs), also called +4 ISCs as they mark the transition from rapidly cycling Lgr5+ ISCs at the base of the crypt and the TA zone64. While d-ISCs cycle slowly or not at all in homeostatic conditions, they accumulate in response to nutrient restriction and participate in the regenerative growth during refeeding64. Hence, rapid regrowth of the gut upon calorie intake might rely on differentiation of stalled progenitors in both flies and mammals. The Daw-mediated adaptive resizing of the gut is physiologically relevant, as knockdown of Babo-C in EBs decreases the chances of survival of flies exposed to intermittent cycles of starvation and refeeding. Future research should aim at addressing whether TGF-β signaling plays a similar prominent role in adaptation of gut size to calorie intake in mammals.
While regulators of organ plasticity are essential for host adaptation, reproductivity and survival in an ever-changing environment, the same signals are often deregulated in cancers. Indeed, mutations affecting TGF-β/Nodal/activin signaling has been observed in a wide range of cancers, and better understanding of how TGF-β/Nodal/activin signaling affects intestinal growth might provide a starting point for the development of therapeutic strategies targeting colorectal cancers.
Methods
Fly stocks and husbandry
Animals were maintained on a standard cornmeal diet (containing: 82 g/L cornmeal, 60 g/L sucrose, 34 g/L yeast, 8 g/L agar, 4.8 mL/L propionic acid and 1.6 g/L methyl-4- hydroxybenzoate) at 25 °C and 60% relative humidity under 12-hour light/dark cycle conditions. Virgin females were used for experiments unless otherwise stated. w1118 was used as control for most experiments whereas the attP2 TRiP background stock was used as a control for TRiP RNAi lines. Temporal control of transgene expression using tubGal80ts in adult flies was achieved by raising flies at 18 °C through development until 4–7 days after eclosion to allow maturation of the digestive system. Then, flies were shifted to 29 °C to induce Gal4 mediated transgene expression in a cell-type-specific manner. The duration of UAS induction was 10 days unless otherwise stated. Flies were flipped onto fresh medium every second day. For experiments using CRISPR/Cas9, UAS-Cas9.P2, and UAS-gRNA were co-induced at 29 °C for 10 days to allow mutagenesis of the target gene followed by a shift to 18 °C for 30 days.
The following lines were generous gifts from the colleagues in the fly community: Cell fate sensor, Cfs: w;esg-Gal4,UAS-CFP,Su(H)Gbe-nlsGFP; ubi-his2av-RFP (Lucy O’brien, Stanford University, USA). Myo1a-Gal4, Su(H)Gbe-Gal4 and Voila-Gal4 (Armel Gallet, ISA, France). esg-ReDDM UAS-CD8::GFP; UAS-H2B::RFP, tubGal80ts/TM6b (Maria Dominguez, IN, Spain). Su(H)-Gal80, TubGal80ts (Heinrich Jasper, Genentech, USA), UAS-dSmad2SDVD, Actβ-Gal4 and Daw-Gal4 (Michael O’Connor, CBS, USA). Actβ-gRNA v342095, babo-gRNA v341225, dSmad2-gRNA v342177, UAS-babo-RNAi v106092, UAS-Daw-RNAi v105309, Babo::GFP v318433 and UAS-Fs-RNAi v46260 were obtained from the Vienna Drosophila RNAi center. UAS-Actβ-RNAi BL29597, UAS-babo-RNAi BL29533, UAS-babo-A-RNAi BL44400, UAS-babo-B-RNAi BL44401, UAS-babo-C-RNAi BL44402, UAS-dSmad2-RNAi BL41670, UAS-Fs-RNAi BL57394, babo-Gal4 BL83164, esg-Gal4 BL93857, Su(H)Gbe-LacZ BL83352, esg-lacZ BL10359, UAS-Cas9.P2 BL58986, UAS-GFP BL39760, tub-Gal80ts BL7107 and BL7108, da-gal4 BL95282, mex-Gal4 BL91368, TRiP attP2 background BL36303 were obtained from the Bloomington stock center.
Detailed information about the genotypes behind each Figure is presented in Supplementary Table 1.
Longevity
Flies raised at 18 °C through development were allowed to emerge over 48 h and transferred to fresh media for an additional 48 h at 25 °C to mate. Mated female flies were then sorted into vials containing sugar/yeast food (consisting of 90 g/L sucrose, 80 g/L yeast, 10 g/L agar, 0,5% propionic acid, and 0.15% methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate) and transferred to 29 °C to induce transgenes. Flies were transferred onto fresh food every 2–3 days and the number of dead animals was assessed each 2–3 day until all animals had died. UAS-RNAi transgenes were backcrossed for at least 7 generations into the w1118 background used as control.
Oral infections
For oral infections with bacteria (Ecc15 or Pe), overnight cultures were grown from single colonies (Ecc15) or directly from a glycerol stock kept at −80 °C (Pe). Cultures were grown in conical flasks containing LB broth at 29 °C (Ecc15) or at 30 °C with rifampicin supplied (Pe). The next day optical density OD600 was measured, cultures were spun down and the remaining bacterial pellet was resuspended in an appropriate volume of 5% sucrose such that OD600 was adjusted to 200. The concentrated bacterial solution was then, in a volume of 50 μl, added directly onto Whatman filter paper discs resting on the surface of normal fly food with reduced yeast content (containing: 82 g/L cornmeal, 60 g/L sucrose, 17 g/L yeast, 8 g/L agar and 4.6 g/L methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate). To ensure efficient intake of bacteria, flies were sorted by 10 in empty vials and starved for 2 hours before transfer to the prepared vials containing bacteria. To assess survival to bacterial infection with Pe, mated female flies raised at 18 °C through development were sorted 10 flies per vial and transferred to 29 °C for 7 days before initiating the first infection. Flies were repeatedly infected once per day by transferring them to fresh vials with newly prepared Pe solution added. UAS- baboRNAi #106092 was backcrossed for at least 7 generations into the w1118 background used as control.
Starvation refeeding scheme
Flies were nutrient starved in vials containing H20 + 1% agar for 24 or 48 hours. For refeeding, 48 hours starved flies were transferred to normal food and allowed to feed for 24 hours. To assess survival to nutritional fluctuations, mated female flies raised at 18 °C through development were sorted 15 flies per vial and transferred to 29 °C for 4 days before initiating the first starvation-refeeding cycle. The number of dead flies were assessed once per day.
Oxidative stress survival
To assess survival to oxidative stress, mated female flies raised at 18 °C through development were sorted 10 flies per vial and transferred to 29 °C for 15 days before oxidative stress challenge. Sugar/yeast food supplemented with 5% H2O2 was freshly prepared on the day. Flies were starved for 2 hours before being transferred to H2O2 food. The number of dead animals was assessed three times a day until all animals had died.
Dissections and immunohistochemistry
Midguts were dissected in PBS and immediately transferred into fixative consisting of 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 1 hour at RT. Fixed midguts were washed twice with PBS and further two times 15 min with PBS + 0,1% Triton (PBS-T) with agitation. Midguts that were not stained with antibodies (esgReDDM and Cfsts) were immediately washed once with PBS and mounted on microscopy slides at this stage. Midguts that were stained with antibodies were incubated for 2 hours in blocking solution (PBS-T containing 10% FCS) followed by incubation with primary antibodies prepared in blocking solution at 4 °C overnight. The next day, midguts were washed three times 15 min with PBS-T and incubated with secondary antibodies for 3 hours at RT or overnight at 4 °C. At last, the stained midguts were washed two times 15 min with PBS-T followed by a single wash with PBS before being mounted on glass slides in Vectashield mounting media with or without DAPI. All midguts were mounted with 0,12 mm SecureSeal spacers (Grace Bio-Labs) except for experiments assessing the number of mitotic (PH3 + ) cells per gut. Primary antibodies were used with the following dilutions: rabbit anti-PH3 1:1000 (Milipore 06-570), chicken anti-GFP 1:10000 (Abcam 13970), mouse anti-β-Galactosidase (DSHB 40-1 A), mouse anti-Armadillo 1:100 (DSHB N2-7A1), mouse anti-Pros 1:200 (DSHB MR1A), mouse anti-Delta 1:100 (DSHB C594.9B) and rabbit anti-cDcp-1 1:100 (Cell Signaling Asp215). Secondary antibodies were used with the following dilutions: Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit 1:1000 (Thermofisher #A-11008), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-chicken 1:1000 (Thermofisher #A-21467), Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-mouse 1:1000 (Jackson ImmunoResearch #715-165-151) and Cy5-conjugated donkey anti-chicken 1:1000 (Jackson ImmunoResearch #703-175-155). TOPRO-3 (Invitrogen) was used to counterstain nuclei when necessary.
TUNEL assay
Apoptotic cells were detected using the TMR red In Situ Cell Detection Kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Midguts were dissected in PBS and transferred into fixative consisting of 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at RT. The fixed midguts were then handled as described for immunohistochemistry to counterstain with anti-GFP or anti-β-Galactosidase although with secondary antibodies diluted in the TUNEL reaction media and three extra PBS-T washes following the TUNEL reaction.
Microscopy
Mounted midguts were imaged on an inverted Zeizz LSM-900 confocal microscope with Zen Blue software using 5x, 20x, or 40x objectives. For imaging CFP, GFP and RFP together (Cfsts), the following bandwidth settings were used to avoid spectral bleed-through: CFP excitation at 405 nm and detection at 400–480 nm, GFP excitation at 488 nm and detection at 510-550 nm, RFP excitation at 561 nm and detection at 580-700 nm. 6-12 confocal stacks were acquired with an interval of 2 μm spanning the intestinal epithelium from the base to the lumen. An identical number of z-stacks were acquired for each experiment involving quantitative assessment of cell types. All images including the ones for quantifications were acquired in the posterior gut in region R4bc whereas the image in Fig. 1a is taken in region R5. Images were processed using Fiji and Adobe Photoshop software.
Image analysis and quantifications
Image analysis and quantifications were performed using the open-source FIJI software. For quantitative measurements of specific cell types per area, a z-stacks were acquired with a 20x objective in the R4bc region for each mounted gut. Acquired z-stacks were converted to maximum-intensity projections and cell numbers was manually counted using the CellCounter Fiji plugin and normalized to the total epithelial area counted in. Cells per area is defined as cells per 10000 μm2 in all cases. For quantitative measurements of total number of specific cell types in posterior midguts, tiles of z-stacks were acquired covering the entire posterior midgut from top to halfway through the organ. Acquired z-stacks were converted to maximum-intensity projections and cell numbers was manually counted using the CellCounter Fiji plugin and multiplied by two. For quantifications of gut dimensions, tiled images of entire fixed midguts mounted with 0,12 mm spacers were acquired with fluorescence imaging with a 5x objective and stitched together in Zen Blue imaging software (Zeizz). Length was then measured in Fiji by drawing a segmented line using spline along the center of each midgut while R4 width was measured by drawing a straight line perpendicular to the midgut at the widest point in the R4 region. TUNEL+ cells were determined in FIJI by applying the following steps to each maximum-intensity projection: (1) kuwahara filter= 5, (2) smooth, (3) auto threshold = max entropy, (4) convert to mask, (5) watershed, and (6) analyze particles.
RNA extraction and qPCR
8-10 dissected midguts per biological replicate was directly transferred into lysis buffer and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using RNAeasy microkit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For cDNA synthesis, RNA was treated with DNase and reverse-transcribed using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). The resulting cDNA was used for real-time RT-PCR on a QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR system using RealQ Plus 2x Master Mix Green (Ampliqon) with 8 ng of cDNA template. Samples were normalized to levels of ribosomal protein 49 expression levels and analyzed with QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR software using the delta-delta Ct method. Five to six biological replicates were used for each condition or genotype and triplicate measurements were performed.
The following primers were used:
actβ _F 5′-ACG GCA AAT TTT GAC AAA GC-3′
actβ_R 5′-TTG GTA TCA TTC GTC CAC CA-3′
daw _F 5′-TGA GCC ACC TCA TCC AAA TCA CCT-3′
daw_R 5′-TCG ATC ACG ATG AAT GGC CGG TAA-3′
Myo _F 5′-GGC GAC CAC ATA ATG ACT-3′
Myo_R 5′-TTA GCA TCA TCT CCC TGC ATT-3′
babo-A_F 5′-GGC TTT TGT TTC ACG TCC GTG GA-3′
babo-A_R 5′-CTG TTT CAA ATA TCC TCT TCA TAA TCT CAT-3′
babo-B_F 5′-GCA AGG ACA GGG ACT TCT G-3′
babo-B_R 5′-GGC ACA TAA TCT TGG ACG GAG-3′
babo-C_F 5′- GAC CAG TTG CCA CCT GAA GA-3′
babo-C_R 5′- TGG CAC ATA ATC TGG TAG GAC A-3′
Statistics
Visualization of data in graphs and statistical analysis were performed using GraphPad Prism software. Each dataset was assessed for normal distribution using Shapiro-Wilks normality test before analysis. Comparisons of three or more groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests according to the outcome of normality tests followed by post-hoc multiple comparison analysis. Comparisons across genotype and condition were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc multiple comparison analysis. Differences between control and one group was analyzed by unpaired t-tests if passing normality tests or Mann-Whitney tests if not. Comparisons of survival curves was analyzed using Mantel-Cox Log Rank test. All error bars indicate standard deviation.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All source data needed to evaluate the conclusions are present in the paper as a Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Liu, X., Hodgson, J. J. & Buchon, N. Drosophila as a model for homeostatic, antibacterial, and antiviral mechanisms in the gut. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006277 (2017).
Colombani, J. & Andersen, D. S. The Drosophila gut: a gatekeeper and coordinator of organism fitness and physiology. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 9, e378 (2020).
Biteau, B. & Jasper, H. Slit/Robo signaling regulates cell fate decisions in the intestinal stem cell lineage of Drosophila. Cell Rep. 7, 1867–1875 (2014).
Guo, Z. & Ohlstein, B. Stem cell regulation. Bidirectional Notch signaling regulates Drosophila intestinal stem cell multipotency. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0988 (2015).
Micchelli, C. A. & Perrimon, N. Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature 439, 475–479 (2006).
Ohlstein, B. & Spradling, A. The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature 439, 470–474 (2006).
Zeng, X. & Hou, S. X. Enteroendocrine cells are generated from stem cells through a distinct progenitor in the adult Drosophila posterior midgut. Development 142, 644–653 (2015).
de Navascues, J. et al. Drosophila midgut homeostasis involves neutral competition between symmetrically dividing intestinal stem cells. EMBO J. 31, 2473–2485 (2012).
Reiff, T. et al. Endocrine remodelling of the adult intestine sustains reproduction in Drosophila. Elife 4, e06930 (2015).
Hadjieconomou, D. et al. Enteric neurons increase maternal food intake during reproduction. Nature 587, 455 (2020).
Ahmed, S. M. H. et al. Fitness trade-offs incurred by ovary-to-gut steroid signalling in Drosophila. Nature 584, 415–419 (2020).
O’Brien, L. E., Soliman, S. S., Li, X. & Bilder, D. Altered modes of stem cell division drive adaptive intestinal growth. Cell 147, 603–614 (2011).
Altmann, G. G. Influence of starvation and refeeding on mucosal size and epithelial renewal in the rat small intestine. Am. J. Anat. 133, 391–400 (1972).
Andrew, A. L. et al. Rapid changes in gene expression direct rapid shifts in intestinal form and function in the Burmese python after feeding. Physiol. Genom. 47, 147–157 (2015).
Dunel-Erb, S. et al. Restoration of the jejunal mucosa in rats refed after prolonged fasting. Comp. Biochem Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 129, 933–947 (2001).
Lucchetta, E. M. & Ohlstein, B. Amitosis of polyploid cells regenerates functional stem cells in the Drosophila intestine. Cell Stem Cell 20, 609–620.e606 (2017).
McLeod, C. J., Wang, L., Wong, C. & Jones, D. L. Stem cell dynamics in response to nutrient availability. Curr. Biol. 20, 2100–2105 (2010).
Secor, S. M., Stein, E. D. & Diamond, J. Rapid upregulation of snake intestine in response to feeding: a new model of intestinal adaptation. Am. J. Physiol. 266, G695–705 (1994).
Hu, D. J. & Jasper, H. Control of intestinal cell fate by dynamic mitotic spindle repositioning influences epithelial homeostasis and longevity. Cell Rep. 28, 2807–2823.e2805 (2019).
Tian, A., Wang, B. & Jiang, J. Injury-stimulated and self-restrained BMP signaling dynamically regulates stem cell pool size during Drosophila midgut regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2699–E2708 (2017).
Zhai, Z., Boquete, J. P. & Lemaitre, B. A genetic framework controlling the differentiation of intestinal stem cells during regeneration in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006854 (2017).
Song, W., Ghosh, A. C., Cheng, D. & Perrimon, N. Endocrine regulation of energy balance by Drosophila TGF-beta/activins. Bioessays 40, e1800044 (2018).
Pauklin, S. & Vallier, L. Activin/Nodal signalling in stem cells. Development 142, 607–619 (2015).
Brummel, T. et al. The Drosophila activin receptor baboon signals through dSmad2 and controls cell proliferation but not patterning during larval development. Genes Dev. 13, 98–111 (1999).
Jensen, P. A., Zheng, X., Lee, T. & O’Connor, M. B. The Drosophila Activin-like ligand Dawdle signals preferentially through one isoform of the Type-I receptor Baboon. Mech. Dev. 126, 950–957 (2009).
Awasaki, T., Huang, Y., O’Connor, M. B. & Lee, T. Glia instruct developmental neuronal remodeling through TGF-beta signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 821–823 (2011).
Song, W. et al. Midgut-derived activin regulates glucagon-like action in the fat body and glycemic control. Cell Metab. 25, 386–399 (2017).
Upadhyay, A., Peterson, A. J., Kim, M. J. & O’Connor, M. B. Muscle-derived Myoglianin regulates Drosophila imaginal disc growth. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51710 (2020).
Ellis, J. E., Parker, L., Cho, J. & Arora, K. Activin signaling functions upstream of Gbb to regulate synaptic growth at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Dev. Biol. 342, 121–133 (2010).
Lengil, T., Gancz, D. & Gilboa, L. Activin signaling balances proliferation and differentiation of ovarian niche precursors and enables adjustment of niche numbers. Development 142, 883–892 (2015).
Ng, J. TGF-beta signals regulate axonal development through distinct Smad-independent mechanisms. Development 135, 4025–4035 (2008).
Parker, L., Ellis, J. E., Nguyen, M. Q. & Arora, K. The divergent TGF-beta ligand Dawdle utilizes an activin pathway to influence axon guidance in Drosophila. Development 133, 4981–4991 (2006).
Peterson, A. J. & O’Connor, M. B. Activin receptor inhibition by Smad2 regulates Drosophila wing disc patterning through BMP-response elements. Development 140, 649–659 (2013).
Rossi, A. M. & Desplan, C. Extrinsic activin signaling cooperates with an intrinsic temporal program to increase mushroom body neuronal diversity. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58880 (2020).
Wells, B. S., Pistillo, D., Barnhart, E. & Desplan, C. Parallel Activin and BMP signaling coordinates R7/R8 photoreceptor subtype pairing in the stochastic Drosophila retina. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25301 (2017).
Yu, X. M. et al. Plum, an immunoglobulin superfamily protein, regulates axon pruning by facilitating TGF-beta signaling. Neuron 78, 456–468 (2013).
Zheng, X. et al. Baboon/dSmad2 TGF-beta signaling is required during late larval stage for development of adult-specific neurons. EMBO J. 25, 615–627 (2006).
Zhu, C. C. et al. Drosophila Activin- and the Activin-like product Dawdle function redundantly to regulate proliferation in the larval brain. Development 135, 513–521 (2008).
Ting, C. Y. et al. Photoreceptor-derived activin promotes dendritic termination and restricts the receptive fields of first-order interneurons in Drosophila. Neuron 81, 830–846 (2014).
Kadaja, M. et al. SOX9: a stem cell transcriptional regulator of secreted niche signaling factors. Genes Dev. 28, 328–341 (2014).
Min, S. et al. p63 and its target follistatin maintain salivary gland stem/progenitor cell function through TGF-beta/activin signaling. iScience 23, 101524 (2020).
Herrera, S. C. et al. Proliferative stem cells maintain quiescence of their niche by secreting the Activin inhibitor Follistatin. Dev. Cell 56, 2284–2294.e2286 (2021).
Lonardo, E. et al. Nodal/Activin signaling drives self-renewal and tumorigenicity of pancreatic cancer stem cells and provides a target for combined drug therapy. Cell Stem Cell 9, 433–446 (2011).
Massague, J. TGFbeta in cancer. Cell 134, 215–230 (2008).
Topczewska, J. M. et al. Embryonic and tumorigenic pathways converge via Nodal signaling: role in melanoma aggressiveness. Nat. Med. 12, 925–932 (2006).
Antonello, Z. A., Reiff, T., Ballesta-Illan, E. & Dominguez, M. Robust intestinal homeostasis relies on cellular plasticity in enteroblasts mediated by miR-8-Escargot switch. EMBO J. 34, 2025–2041 (2015).
Martin, J. L. et al. Long-term live imaging of the Drosophila adult midgut reveals real-time dynamics of division, differentiation and loss. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36248 (2018).
Dutta, D., Buchon, N., Xiang, J. & Edgar, B. A. Regional cell specific RNA expression profiling of FACS isolated drosophila intestinal cell populations. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. 34, 2F 2 1–2F 2 14 (2015).
Gehart, H. & Clevers, H. Tales from the crypt: new insights into intestinal stem cells. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 19–34 (2019).
Wang, S. & Chen, Y. G. BMP signaling in homeostasis, transformation and inflammatory response of intestinal epithelium. Sci. China Life Sci. 61, 800–807 (2018).
Ayyaz, A., Li, H. & Jasper, H. Haemocytes control stem cell activity in the Drosophila intestine. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 736–748 (2015).
Guo, Z., Driver, I. & Ohlstein, B. Injury-induced BMP signaling negatively regulates Drosophila midgut homeostasis. J. Cell Biol. 201, 945–961 (2013).
Zhou, J. et al. Dpp/Gbb signaling is required for normal intestinal regeneration during infection. Dev. Biol. 399, 189–203 (2015).
Chakrabarti, S. et al. Remote control of intestinal stem cell activity by haemocytes in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006089 (2016).
Makhijani, K. et al. Regulation of Drosophila hematopoietic sites by Activin-beta from active sensory neurons. Nat. Commun. 8, 15990 (2017).
Fink, M. & Wrana, J. L. Regulation of homeostasis and regeneration in the adult intestinal epithelium by the TGF-beta superfamily. Dev. Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.500 (2022).
Cammareri, P. et al. TGFbeta pathway limits dedifferentiation following WNT and MAPK pathway activation to suppress intestinal tumourigenesis. Cell Death Differ. 24, 1681–1693 (2017).
Flentjar, N. et al. TGF-betaRII rescues development of small intestinal epithelial cells in Elf3-deficient mice. Gastroenterology 132, 1410–1419 (2007).
Halttunen, T., Marttinen, A., Rantala, I., Kainulainen, H. & Maki, M. Fibroblasts and transforming growth factor beta induce organization and differentiation of T84 human epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 111, 1252–1262 (1996).
Kurokowa, M., Lynch, K. & Podolsky, D. K. Effects of growth factors on an intestinal epithelial cell line: transforming growth factor beta inhibits proliferation and stimulates differentiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 142, 775–782 (1987).
Yamada, Y. et al. Functional roles of TGF-beta1 in intestinal epithelial cells through Smad-dependent and non-Smad pathways. Dig. Dis. Sci. 58, 1207–1217 (2013).
Oshima, H. et al. Suppressing TGFbeta signaling in regenerating epithelia in an inflammatory microenvironment is sufficient to cause invasive intestinal cancer. Cancer Res. 75, 766–776 (2015).
Aiello, L. C. & Wheeler, P. The expensive-tissue hypothesis. Curr. Anthropol. 36, 199–221 (1995).
Richmond, C. A. et al. Dormant intestinal stem cells are regulated by PTEN and nutritional status. Cell Rep. 13, 2403–2411 (2015).
Yilmaz, O. H. et al. mTORC1 in the Paneth cell niche couples intestinal stem-cell function to calorie intake. Nature 486, 490–495 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all members of the Colombani and Andersen laboratory for scientific discussion and for carefully reading the manuscript. We thank M. O’Connor, M. Dominguez, A. Gallet, L. O’Brien, the Bloomington Stock Center and the Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center for fly stocks. J.C. and D.S.A. are funded by H2020 European Research Council grant number 803630, Novo Nordisk Foundation grant number NNF180C0033920. We thank the Carlsberg foundation for an equipment grant CF19-0353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.F.C., J.C., and D.S.A designed the research, C.F.C., Q.L, R.L, J.C., and D.S.A performed the genetic screen, C.F.C. conducted all the remaining experiments for the manuscript, C.F.C., J.C., and D.S.A analyzed the data, J.C. and D.S.A supervised the project, and D.S.A. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Christensen, C.F., Laurichesse, Q., Loudhaief, R. et al. Drosophila activins adapt gut size to food intake and promote regenerative growth. Nat Commun 15, 273 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44553-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44553-9
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.