Abstract
Ambient-temperature sodium-sulfur (Na-S) batteries are potential attractive alternatives to lithium-ion batteries owing to their high theoretical specific energy of 1,274 Wh kg−1 based on the mass of Na2S and abundant sulfur resources. However, their practical viability is impeded by sodium polysulfide shuttling. Here, we report an intercalation-conversion hybrid positive electrode material by coupling the intercalation-type catalyst, MoTe2, with the conversion-type active material, sulfur. In addition, MoTe2 nanosheets vertically grown on graphene flakes offer abundant active catalytic sites, further boosting the catalytic activity for sulfur redox. When used as a composite positive electrode and assembled in a coin cell with excess Na, a discharge capacity of 1,081 mA h gs−1 based on the mass of S with a capacity fade rate of 0.05% per cycle over 350 cycles at 0.1 C rate in a voltage range of 0.8 to 2.8 V is realized under a high sulfur loading of 3.5 mg cm−2 and a lean electrolyte condition with an electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio of 7 μL mg−1. A fundamental understanding of the electrocatalysis of MoTe2 is further revealed by in-situ synchrotron-based operando X-ray diffraction and ex-situ time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Room temperature (RT) sodium-sulfur (Na-S) batteries emerge as strong contenders for the next-generation energy storage systems. This recognition stems from their favorable sustainability and economic attributes, owing to their cost-effectiveness and the abundance of both sodium and sulfur in the Earth’s crust1,2,3,4,5,6. Moreover, Na-S batteries have high theoretical specific capacity of 1675 mA h gs−1 (gs refers to based on the mass sulfur) and specific energy of 1274 Wh kg−1 (based on the mass of Na2S), which are optimal for energy storage systems7,8,9. However, several technical challenges remain before the practical applications of Na-S batteries. The poor electronic conductivity of sulfur (5 × 10−28 S m−1 at 25 °C) limits electron transport in the cathode, resulting in low sulfur utilization10,11,12,13. Moreover, the Na polysulfide (NaPSs) intermediates are highly soluble in organic electrolytes causing the notorious shuttle effect, which leads to substantial active material loss and interfacial deterioration14,15,16.
Inspired by the developments of lithium-sulfur batteries, including the hybrid strategies of TiS2, Mo6S8, and S17,18, intensive research efforts have been focused in the Na-S field, such as the combination of conductive carbon and sulfur, modification of separators with carbon, and development of sulfides cathode19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26. These systems have illustrated decent electrochemical performance, but only with a low sulfur loading (<2 mg cm−2). The lifespan of the Na-S batteries with high sulfur loadings (>4 mg cm−2) still needs significant improvement. In addition, an excessive amount of electrolyte is required in these systems to guarantee a complete conversion from S to Na2S in Na-S batteries. Recently, the catalytic effect was demonstrated to be an efficient way to promote the transformation of NaPSs, improving the redox kinetics in Na-S batteries27,28. For example, Zhang et al. prepared Mo2N-W2N heterostructures as a catalyst for RT Na-S batteries to accelerate the kinetics of the redox29, exhibiting a stable cycling performance over 400 cycles with a sulfur loading of 2.7 mg cm−2. However, recently reported work is mainly based on carbonate electrolytes, where the flooded electrolyte amount is required to thoroughly wet the glass fiber separator. He et al. developed a localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE) that enables a stable Na-S battery under a decent amount of electrolyte condition30. But the capacity is only 675 mA h gs−1 after 300 cycles with a sulfur loading of 2 mg cm−2 at a low rate of 0.1 C (1 C = 1675 mA gs−1), which is far from the theoretical capacity of 1675 mA h gs−1 of Na-S batteries. Recently, several sulfide electrocatalysts, including MoS2, ZnS, FeS2, and ZnS-CoS2, have been shown to have an intercalative behavior which can further promote the kinetics of the redox both in Li-S and Na-S batteries31,32,33,34,35,36. All of those work further motivates us to develop a new electrocatalysts to improve the electrochemical performance with high sulfur loading. In this regard, achieving high-performance Na-S batteries under rigorous conditions, including high active material loading (>3 mg cm−2) and lean electrolyte (electrolyte-to-sulfur ratio: <15 μl mg−1), is still challenging, which is crucial to achieving the practical application of Na-S batteries. Therefore, the utilization of sulfur and the kinetics of the redox need to be further improved.
Here, we propose a concept of the intercalation-conversion hybrid cathode to promote the kinetics of sulfur redox and improve the utilization of sulfur by introducing electrochemically active MoTe2 with fast sodium intercalation reaction into the sulfur cathode for Na-S batteries. As one of the many transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), MoTe2 possesses a much wider interlayer distance of 0.69 nm than MoS2 (0.61 nm)37. The large interlayer space can easily accommodate the large Na-ions, resulting in better TMDs structural stability during the cycling process. Moreover, the electronic conductivity of MoTe2 is 1.8 S cm−1 (25 °C), which is nine times higher than that of MoSe2 (0.2 S cm−1, 25 °C)38. Such a result demonstrates that the MoTe2 can further promote the transport of electrons. MoTe2 in the voltage range of 0.8 to 2.8 V (vs. Na+/Na) can convert to NaxMoTe2. This conversion is intercalative and thus has faster kinetics39, which is similar to the prior studies for Li-S batteries as mentioned above where sulfide electrocatalysts were reported to exhibit intercalation. In addition, we rationally design the MoTe2 with a nanosheet morphology which vertically grows on the graphene flakes. Such a nanostructure provides abundant active catalytic sites, further boosting catalytic activity for conversion between S and Na2S in Na-S batteries. The catalytic mechanism with rich active catalytic sites of hybrid cathode enables stable cycling performance with a low capacity fade rate of 0.02% per cycle after 900 cycles with practical parameters including lean electrolyte and high sulfur loading.
Results
Fabrication and characterization of the MTG host
MoTe2 nanosheets were rationally prepared by a facile hydrothermal reaction of MoO3, Te powder, and hydrazine hydrate at 220 °C for 24 h to obtain an intercalation-conversion hybrid cathode. Graphene oxide was introduced into the above reaction to improve the catalytic activity sites. Owing to the rich functional group on the graphene oxide providing abundant anchor sites, the MoTe2 can uniformly grow on the graphene sheet, forming a MoTe2-graphene sheet (MTG). More importantly, the architecture with a few-layered MoTe2 nanosheets that are vertically aligned on graphene surfaces was obtained through the self-assembly of MoTe2 nanosheets on graphene (Fig. 1a). Such an architecture ensures more abundant exposed active edge sites of MoTe2 nanosheets to encourage a fast Na+ intercalation. As shown in Fig. 1b, when the MTG is employed as a catalyst for Na-S batteries, it shows several advantages. First, the intercalation-type MoTe2 can provide fast Na-ion transport, ensuring fast reaction kinetics during charge-discharge cycling. Second, the architecture of vertically aligned few-layered MoTe2 on graphene provides more abundant exposed active edge sites for catalyzing sulfur species redox. Third, the highly conductive graphene skeleton guarantees fast charge transfer, further accelerating the sulfur species conversion reaction.
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images in Fig. 2a–c reveal that MoTe2 nanosheets (<10 layers, as shown in Fig. 2e) are homogeneously and vertically aligned on the surface of the graphene nanoflakes, forming a heterostructured micro forest. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image in Fig. 2d shows that the few-layered MoTe2 nanosheets grow on both sides of the graphene flakes since both are accessible to the MoTe2 precursors during the reaction. Such an architecture further improves the exposure of active sites, offering rich electrode/electrolyte interfaces for sulfur conversion reactions and efficient ionic diffusion. The high-resolution TEM image in Fig. 2e indicates the interlayer spacing of 0.73 nm, corresponding to the (002) plane of MoTe2. It should be noted that the interlayer spacing is larger than that of bulk MoTe2 (JCPDS No. 071-2157), which has an interlayer spacing of 0.69 nm. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX) elemental mappings of the MTG in Fig. 2f demonstrate that Mo and Te are uniformly distributed on the C region, evidencing that the ultrathin MoTe2 nanosheets are evenly aligned on the graphene flakes.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern in Fig. 2g can be indexed to be the hexagonal phase of 1 T′-MoTe2. Compared to the standard XRD pattern (JCPDS No. 071-2157), the (002) peak displays a negative shift by 0.5°. The d-spacing of the (002) plane can be calculated to be 0.73 nm, which matches the TEM data well. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis in Fig. 2h further indicates that MTG possesses a porous structure, offering rich loading sites for sulfur. The corresponding pore size distribution via the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method is given in Fig. 2i, which indicates the bimodal mesopores in MTG.
Interaction between MTG and sulfur species
In order to understand the underlying mechanism of MTG in promoting kinetics of sulfur redox reaction for Na-S batteries, the MTG/S and C/S cathodes with high sulfur loading of 3.5 mg cm−2 were tested in the localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE) as reported in our previous work30. In detail, the LHCE consists of sodium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (NaFSI), 1,2-Dimethoxyethane (DME), and 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether (TTE) with an molar ratio of 1:1.2:1. The LHCE can not only mitigate the NaPSs shuttling, but can also protect the Na anode from dendritic growth. As shown in Fig. S1, the Na||Cu cell with LHCE at 1 mA cm−2 with an areal capacity of 1 mAh cm−2 can deliver a stabilized Coulombic efficiency of 95.2% at 50 cycles. The discharge profile of the C/S cathode in Fig. 3a consists of a plateau followed by a slope, which is different from the single-sloping profile in our previous report30. This plateau at 2.1 V in the discharge curve is mainly attributed to the NaPS formation. Although the LHCE can significantly mitigate the NaPS dissolution into the electrolyte, the C/S cathode with higher sulfur loading will form a lot of NaPSs during the conversion, which is beyond the ability of LHCE to suppress NaPSs dissolution. Therefore, an obvious plateau related to the NaPS formation can easily be recognized. In addition, a larger voltage hysteresis (ΔE, voltage difference between the charge and discharge profiles at the 50% capacity of the cells) of 0.97 V was detected compared to our previous report30. Such enlarged voltage hysteresis indicates a sluggish redox reaction kinetics brought about by increasing the sulfur loading. In contrast, the plateau at 2.1 V in the discharge profile of the MTG/S cathode in Fig. 3b becomes very short and imperceptible, indicating a limited NaPS formation and dissolution in the MTG/S cathode. Also, the MTG/S cathode could exhibit a low voltage hysteresis of 0.73 V. These features suggest a promoted kinetics of sulfur redox reaction in MTG/S cathode. Interestingly, a new plateau at 0.9 V was observed in the discharge profile attributed to the sodiation of MoTe2 to NaxMoTe2. In addition, a new plateau at 1.05 V was detected in the charging process corresponding to the desodiation of NaxMoTe2 to MoTe2. These behaviors match well with the voltage profile of MoTe2 in Fig. S2 and previous reports39. The sodiation/desodiation behaviors of MTG significantly promote the kinetics of sulfur redox reaction.
To further identify the intercalation-conversion electrochemistry in MTG/S cathode, cyclic voltammetry (CV) characteristics were obtained in the voltage range between 0.8 and 2.8 V. The CVs were recorded at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1, as shown in Fig. 3c, d. The CV curve of C/S cathode shows two representative cathodic peaks at 2.01 and 1.68 V that are attributed to the reduction of sulfur to NaPS and Na2S, respectively. The anodic peaks at 2.08 and 2.30 V are owing to, respectively, the coupled conversion from Na2S to NaPSs and sulfur. As shown in Fig. 3d, the two cathodic peaks related to the sulfur conversion also can be detected. Compared to those of the C/S cathode, the peaks of the MTG/S cathode show a positive shift and become more distinguished, displaying smaller current response and larger polarization. The above results demonstrate that the MTG/S cathode enables a faster redox reaction process and low intrinsic resistance40. Additionally, a new cathodic peak at 0.89 V and an anodic peak at 1.06 V appear in the CV curve of MTG/S cathode, which are related to, respectively, the sodiation of MoTe2 to NaxMoTe2 and desodiation of NaxMoTe2 to MoTe2. These electrochemical behaviors match well with the voltage profile in Fig. 3b.
Static adsorption of polysulfides can effectively reveal the affinity of host toward sulfur species, forming during the sulfur conversion in Na-S batteries. As shown in Fig. 3e, the ultraviolet-visible (UV–vis) spectrum of Na2S6 solution exhibits three broad peaks at 239, 283, and 421 nm, corresponding to the S62−, S62−, and S42− species, respectively. After contacting with carbon for 24 h, the UV–vis spectrum of the solution shows only a slight change. As a comparison, the characteristic peaks of polysulfides in the spectrum of the solution contacting with MTG completely vanish, indicating a strong adsorption ability of MTG. Visual adsorption experiments were carried out in Na2S6 solution to evaluate the chemical anchoring ability of MTG toward polysulfides. As shown in Fig. S3, the polysulfide solution containing MTG is completely transparent after adsorption. In contrast, the polysulfide solution containing C remains light-yellow after adsorption, indicating the much stronger absorptivity of MTG toward polysulfides than that of C. When pure MoTe2 is used as a sulfur host, it can also be used as a polysulfide absorber (Fig. S3). However, the electronic conductivity of MoTe2 is not as high as graphene. Therefore, using pure MoTe2 may not be as beneficial to improve the sulfur redox kinetics. The strong coupling of graphene sheets with MoTe2 nanosheets enhances ionic and electronic transport simultaneously, which is important to achieve a fast sulfur redox. In addition to the adsorption capability of polysulfide, sulfur catalysis also plays an important role in the enhancement of sulfur redox. The liquid-solid nucleation behaviors of sodium sulfide (Na2S) on the host can reflect the kinetics of sulfur redox reaction, involving the liquid-solid phase conversion of sulfur species. Here, comparative chronoamperometry curves are illustrated in Fig. 3f. The cell with MTG delivers a higher current response of 0.4 mA and a larger deposition capacity of 161.3 mA h gs−1 than those in the cell with carbon (0.2 mA and 43.7 mA h gs−1, respectively). Such results suggest the superior capability of MTG for promoting the conversion from polysulfide into solid Na2S.
Electrochemical performance
To demonstrate the effectiveness of the intercalation-conversion hybrid cathode, the C/S or MTG/S cathode was paired with Na anode in LHCE and assembled for Na-S cells. Figure 4a shows the voltage profiles of Na||MTG/S cell at various cycles at 0.1 C rate (1 C = 1675 mA gs−1). In the initial discharge cycle, a short slope at 2.0 V related to the NaPS formation is detected from the voltage profile in Fig. 4a. In addition to the NaPS formation slope, a unique plateau of 0.9 V is observed, corresponding to the sodiation process of MoTe2 to NaxMoTe2. In the charge curve, the plateau at 1.0 V associated with desodiation of NaxMoTe2 to MoTe2 can also be detected. All these electrochemical behaviors matched well with the early discussions. After the initial cycle, the NaPS formation slope becomes negligible, indicating a significant suppression of NaPS formation and shuttling in MTG/S cathode. Notably, the plateaus related to the sodiation of MoTe2 to NaxMoTe2 and desodiation of NaxMoTe2 to MoTe2 still can be observed even after 350 cycles, suggesting the MTG has a good activity after an extensive sodiation/desodiation process. The profiles remain stable after the initial cycle, indicating this sulfur reaction pathway in MTG/S is highly reversible under the conditions studied.
The Na-S cell with MTG/S cathode delivers an initial discharge capacity of 1081 mA h gs−1 as shown in Fig. 4b. Even after 350 cycles, the capacity remains at 901 mA h gs−1, corresponding to a capacity fade of as low as 0.05% per cycle. The Coulombic efficiency at 350 cycles is 100%, which indicates little NaPS shuttling in the MTG/S cathode. It should be noted that the sulfur loading is 3.5 mg cm−2, and the electrolyte-to-sulfur (E/S) ratio is controlled to be 7 μl mg−1. The cell with C/S cathode shows poor cycling performance with a rapid fading within 100 cycles, and finally exhibits a capacity of 456 mA h gs−1 after 246 cycles. The capacity based on the total mass of electrode materials is calculated and presented in Fig. S4, which shows the cycling performance improvement of the electrode. Such significant improvement in the specific capacity and lifespan in MTG/S cathode compared to these of C/S cathode further evidence the advantages of MTG in suppressing the NaPS formation and shuttling.
To further identify the role of the sodiation/desodiation of MoTe2 behavior during cycling, the MTG/S cathode was tested in a limiting potential window between 0.8 and 2.8 V. With this potential limit, the continual sodiation/desodiation of MoTe2 was excluded. As shown in Figs. S5 and S6, the capacity of the MTG/S cathode reduces to 637 mA h gs−1 after 100 cycles. The reduction of the capacity can be attributed to two factors. First, without the sodiation/desodiation of MoTe2, the kinetic of the redox was limited, leading to lower utilization of the active material. Second, the sulfur conversion becomes incomplete, resulting in a lower MTG capacity. These results reconfirm the advantage of the intercalation-conversion hybrid cathode.
The MTG/S cathode was further tested at a high current density of 1 C to reveal the kinetics of the reaction and structural stability of the cathode. Figure 4c shows that the MTG/S can still deliver a discharge capacity of 637 mA h gs−1 even after 900 cycles, corresponding to a capacity decay rate of 0.02% per cycle. MTG/S cathode also exhibits improved rate performance at various rates from 0.1 C to 2 C. As shown in Fig. 4d, MTG/S cathode delivers a high specific capacity of 1039, 951, 897, 843, 819, 806, and 694 mA h gs−1, respectively, at 0.1C, 0.2C, 0.3C, 0.5C, 0.8C, 1C, and 2C, suggesting fast reaction kinetics in MTG/S cathode. Furthermore, when the current density switches back to 0.1C, the specific capacity can recover to 1007 mA h gs−1, indicating a highly reversible reaction in the MTG/S cathode.
Higher sulfur loading and higher areal capacities are essential for high energy density. Given this, cells with MTG/S cathode were further tested at higher sulfur loadings to support higher energy density. A further cycling evaluation on MTG/S cathode was performed at 0.1C with higher sulfur loading of 4.7 and 5.8 mg cm−2. As shown in Fig. 4e, with a sulfur loading of 4.7 mg cm−2, MTG/S cathode delivers an initial discharge capacity of 1000 mA h gs−1 and maintains good stability over 100 cycles. Furthermore, MTG/S cathode with a high sulfur loading of 5.8 mg cm−2 can still deliver an initial high capacity of 887 mA h gs−1, equivalent to an areal capacity of 5.1 mA h cm−2. Even after 100 cycles, the MTG/S cathode exhibits good cycling durability with capacity retention of up to 73.8%. The ability of MTG/S cathode to operate under these conditions highlights the abilities of MTG compared to the state-of-the-art hosts, as summarized in Table S1. Such upbeat characteristics point to the alluring host architecture of MTG for high-performance Na-S batteries.
Delineation of the sulfur transformation and interfacial chemistry
Synchrotron-based operando X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted to experimentally assess the sulfur transformation in different hosts. As shown in Fig. S7, a window coin cell was designed for the operando testing, which has been applied in our previous reports41,42. The details of the assembled cells are described in the “Methods” section. Synchrotron X-rays went through all components within a window coin cell, and their diffraction patterns were combined into a single XRD pattern. Figure 5 shows an operando XRD result of sulfur cathodes for Na-S window coin cells. The cells were tested at 0.1C in the voltage range of 0.8 and 2.8 V for one full discharge-charge cycle, during which the XRD signal was simultaneously recorded as reflected by the contour plot next to the discharge-charge profile. In the contour plot of the cell with C/S cathode (Fig. 5a), a set of dominant peaks of α-S8 (JCPDS No. 008-0247) can be clearly detected at the beginning of discharge and remains detectable at high intensity during the entire discharge process, indicating the incomplete conversion of sulfur to Na2S. This is owing to the sluggish kinetics of sulfur redox reaction in C/S cathode. Such incomplete conversion of sulfur well explains the low utilization of active material and low capacity of C/S cathode. In addition to the sulfur peak, one dominant peak at 1.66° corresponding to the (031) of Na2S5 (JCPDS No.044-0823), which can be a representative of the NaPSs, can be detected during the whole discharge process, demonstrating the inability of carbon to promote NaPS conversion and resulting the severe NaPS shuttling in the cell with C/S cathode. In sharp contrast, in the case of the MTG/S cathode (Fig. 5b), the strong α-S8 peak was detected in the contour plot at the beginning of the discharge and gradually vanished along with the discharge process. This suggests the efficient transformation of sulfur to Na2S. It is noted that no obvious peak associated with MTG can be identified because of its much lower intensity compared to sulfur. Moreover, no pronounced Na2S5 peak is observed during the entire discharge process, indicating the effective suppression of NaPS formation and shuttling in MTG/S cathode. During charge, the β-S8 phase gradually appears, which indicates that, by this point, the polar MTG facilitates efficient electron transfer and promotes redox to sulfur, assisting in its nucleation. This results in solid and clear peaks for β-S8 (JCPDS No. 071-0137) by the end of the charge. Thus, this investigation provides clear insights into the efficient polysulfide mediation provided by MTG.
To further investigate the interfacial chemistry of the cathode, time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) was performed, which can easily verify the spatial distribution of sulfur in hosts. Figure 5c shows the ToF-SIMS depth profiles of S- secondary ion in various cycled S cathodes at 0.1C for 100 cycles. The depth profile of cycled C/S cathode exhibits a high intensity in the initial sputtering time of 200 s, then rapidly fades to very low intensity, and finally remains stable at 20% of its peak intensity. This behavior indicates a sulfur migration layer owing to the NaPS shuttling. In sharp contrast, the intensity of the MTG/S cathode quickly reaches its peak and maintains a high value after that. Such a homogeneous distribution of sulfur suggests the excellent confinement of sulfur species within MTG.
The thickness of the sulfur migration layer in C/S cathode can further be revealed by the 3D visualization of the architecture evolution in Fig. 5d. Due to the weak immobilization of carbon toward NaPSs, most sulfur species migrate outside the framework of the carbon host, and only a small amount of sulfur is residual in the carbon host. Such migration of the sulfur results in huge active material loss and consequently leads to the poor lifespan of the Na-S batteries. In sharp contrast, the MTG/S maintains a uniform sulfur distribution over 100 cycles. No sulfur migration was observed in the 3D visualization of the architecture evolution of cycled MTG/S cathode in Fig. 5e. Such uniform sulfur distribution in cycled MTG/S cathode further suggests the MTG architecture remarkably immobilized sulfur species within the cathode structure through physical and chemical molecular interactions. As shown in Fig. S8, the MT/S shows a uniform sulfur distribution after 100 cycles, which is similar to that of MTG/S. The comparative cross-sectional morphologies of cycled Na in Na−S cells with MTG and C/S cathodes are shown in Fig. S9 to demonstrate the advantage of MTG further. As shown in Fig. S9a, the surface of cycled Na paired with MTG/S cathode is smooth without cracking. In contrast, the surface of the Na paired with C/S cathode is covered by a thick uneven layer with many cracks (Fig. S9b), which may be attributed to the NaPS shuttling in the C/S cathode.
In summary, we develop an intercalation-conversion hybrid cathode that enables a shuttle-less sulfur cathode and improves sulfur redox kinetics in ambient-temperature Na-S batteries. The intercalation-type MTG not only serves as multiple adsorptive sites to chemically confine sulfur species and catalyze the sulfur conversions toward fast and durable sulfur electrochemistry, but also offers good short-range ion conduction for sulfur redox reactions by sodiation/desodiation process of MTG. Such an intercalation-conversion pathway further inhibits polysulfide dissolution and shuttling and greatly suppresses parasitic reactions with the Na anode. These simultaneous benefits allow for a long lifespan of 900 cycles with a capacity decay rate of 0.02% per cycle under a high sulfur loading of 3.5 mg cm−2 and a lean electrolyte condition (E/S = 7 μl mg−1).
Methods
Preparation of the MTG
Graphene oxide (GO) was prepared by a modified Hummers’ method similar to that presented in the previous report43. A 5 g amount of graphite and 20 g of KMnO4 were added into 200 ml of concentrated H2SO4 and stirred for 2 h at 35 °C. Then 400 ml of deionized water (DI water) was slowly added into the mixed solution, and the temperature of the solution was kept at 95 °C. Next, 5 ml of H2O2 was added into the previous solution when its temperature decreased to 60 °C. Afterward, 100 ml of diluted HCl was added. Finally, the GO solution was filtrated several times with DI water and then dried. A one-pot solvothermal strategy synthesized MTG. 0.2 g of GO was well dispersed in 45 ml N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) by ultrasonication probe (1000 W) for 30 min to form a uniform suspension. 0.765 g of Te powder, 0.432 g of MoO3, and 15 ml of hydrazine hydrate (35%) were added above the suspension. The mixture was stirred for 24 h, transferred into a 100 ml autoclave, and then heated at 220 °C for 24 h. After cooling down naturally, the formed MTG was vacuum filtered and washed several times with deionized water and ethanol before being dried by freeze-drying.
Preparation of the sulfur cathode
The sulfur cathode in this work was obtained by a modified melt-diffusion method35. The MTG or Ketjen Black carbon was mixed with an appropriate amount of sulfur with a mass ratio of 1:9, and the mixture was heated at 155 °C for 12 h in a sealed vial under an Ar atmosphere. Then, the as-obtained product was heated at 200 °C for 30 min in a flowing Ar atmosphere in a tube furnace to remove the redundant sulfur outside of the MTG or Ketjen Black carbon. The sulfur content in the composite was calculated to be ~87 wt%, which was determined by comparing the weight of the composites before and after melt-diffusion method.
Preparation of the electrolyte
Sodium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (NaFSI, Solvionic Corporation) was dried in a vacuum oven for 24 h at 60 °C. 1,2-Dimethoxyethane (DME, Sigma-Aldrich) was dried with molecule sieves for 3 days. The electrolyte was prepared inside an Ar-filled glove box. Particularly, DME was mixed with NaFSI at a molar ratio of 1:1.2 and stirred over 3 h to obtain transparent solutions. Then, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether (TTE) was added to the above solutions with the same molar amount as NaFSI.
Characterizations
The morphology investigation was performed with a scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta 650 SEM operated at 20 kV) and an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer to detect the elemental signals. TEM images were collected with a TEM field emission from JEOL 2010F powered at 200 kV. The adsorption of the host toward the polysulfide (Na2S6 was chosen as a representative) was measured with a UV–vis spectrometer (Cary 5000) with baseline correction (Varian).
Synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD)
Synchrotron operando XRD measurements were collected at the 11-ID-C beamline at the Advanced Photon Source (APS) at Argonne National Laboratory. The X-ray energy was 105.7 keV, and the beam spot size was 0.5 mm by 0.5 mm. A Perkin Elmer area detector was used to collect the 2D diffraction images, the sample-to-detector distance was calibrated using a CeO2 standard, and the images were integrated into 1D diffraction patterns using the GSAS-II package44. XRD data were collected continuously in transmission mode by rastering back and forth between cells with a collection time of 2 min per pattern, during which the cells were cycled at 0.1C rate from 0.8–2.8 V for one full charge-discharge cycle. House-built CR2016-type window coin cells were assembled inside a glovebox with H2O and O2 levels lower than 1 ppm. The schematic of the window coin cell is shown in Fig. S7. Both the top casing and the bottom casing were punched with a 3 mm in diameter window to allow the penetration of X-ray. The windows were sealed with Al foil (12 μm thick) and Cu foil (9 μm thick), respectively, on the cathode side and the anode side. An epoxy composed of Eccobond 45 and Catalyst 15 with a ratio of 1:1 in volume was applied to allow a reliable sealing, as demonstrated in previous publications41,45. Two discs of Na metal were used as both the ion source and as the spacer to maintain good mechanical contact with the sulfur electrode. These house-built cells were assembled in our lab and shipped to APS for operando characterization.
Electrochemical measurements
The electrodes for the liquid-solid reaction kinetics study contained 60 wt% MTG or Ketjen Black carbon, 20 wt% Super-P, and 20 wt% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) binder. The main reason CMC is used as the binder for the MTG/S electrode is that the Na-ions present in CMC could potentially provide some ionic conductivity, greatly improving the reversible capacity of Na-S cells. In addition, compared with PVDF, the electrode with CMC as a binder shows enhanced electrochemical performance, consistent with previous reports46. The sodium foil was prepared manually during cell assembly. The thickness of sodium foils is around 600 μm. The Na||Cu cells were constructed using Cu foil (99.95% purity, 9 μm thickness, Guangdong Canrd New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.) as working electrode, Na metal as counter electrode. Following a previously validated method, the Na||Na2S6 cells were constructed for liquid-solid reaction kinetics study with chronoamperometry. In detail, the working electrode (MTG or Ketjen Black carbon) was assembled with Celgard 2500 separator and a Na foil anode inside an Ar-filled glove box. A 30 μl of 0.2 M Na2S6/1 M NaTFSI-tetraglyme catholyte and 20 μl of 1 M NaTFSI-tetraglyme anolyte were used. Cells were discharged galvanostatically to 1.3 V, followed by a potentiostatic discharging at 1.25 V for about 10,000 s. For the standard Na-S batteries, each electrode contained 80 wt% sulfur composite, 5 wt% Super-P, 5 wt% multi-walled carbon nanotubes, and 10 wt% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) binder. All electrodes were cut into small plates with a diameter of 10 mm. The sulfur loading in each electrode was ~70 wt%. Coin-type (CR2032) cells were assembled in an Ar-filled glove box with sodium metal as the anode. Celgard 2500 was used as the separator. The electrolytes were prepared as in the abovementioned procedures. The E/S ratio in the coin cells was 7 μl mg−1. An Arbin battery cycler was used to conduct the cycling performance between 0.8 and 2.8 V. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were evaluated with a VoltaLab PGZ 402 Potentiostat with various scan rates in the potential range of 0.8 and 2.8 V. All the cells were tested at room temperature. In this work, the specific capacity values were calculated based on sulfur mass (gs).
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Li, S. et al. High-performance room temperature sodium–sulfur battery by eutectic acceleration in tellurium-doped sulfurized polyacrylonitrile. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 2956–2964 (2019).
Yan, J. et al. An in situ prepared covalent sulfur–carbon composite electrode for high-performance room-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1307–1315 (2020).
Zhang, S., Yao, Y. & Yu, Y. Frontiers for room-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 529–536 (2021).
Bao, W. et al. Boosting performance of Na–S batteries using sulfur-doped Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets with a strong affinity to sodium polysulfides. ACS Nano 13, 11500–11509 (2019).
Wang, C. et al. Frogspawn‐coral‐like hollow sodium sulfide nanostructured cathode for high‐rate performance sodium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1803251 (2019).
Ye, H. & Li, Y. Room-temperature metal–sulfur batteries: what can we learn from lithium–sulfur? InfoMat 4, e12291 (2022).
Zhou, J. et al. Sulfur in amorphous silica for an advanced room‐temperature sodium–sulfur battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 10129–10136 (2021).
Ye, C. et al. A Mo5N6 electrocatalyst for efficient Na2S electrodeposition in room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Nat. Commun. 12, 7195 (2021).
Kumar, V. et al. An artificial metal-alloy interphase for high-rate and long-life sodium–sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 29, 1–8 (2020).
Zhang, B. W. et al. Long‐life room‐temperature sodium–sulfur batteries by virtue of transition‐metal‐nanocluster–sulfur interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 1484–1488 (2019).
Liu, D. et al. Recent advances in cathode materials for room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. ChemPhysChem 20, 3164–3176 (2019).
Zou, R., Liu, W. & Ran, F. Sulfur-containing polymer cathode materials: from energy storage mechanism to energy density. InfoMat 4, e12319 (2022).
Wang, T. et al. Strategies toward high-loading lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 116–150 (2023).
Pampel, J., Dörfler, S., Althues, H. & Kaskel, S. Designing room temperature sodium sulfur batteries with long cycle-life at pouch cell level. Energy Storage Mater. 21, 41–49 (2019).
Wu, J. et al. Non-flammable electrolyte for dendrite-free sodium-sulfur battery. Energy Storage Mater. 23, 8–16 (2019).
Zhang, Y. et al. Complex permittivity-dependent plasma confinement-assisted growth of asymmetric vertical graphene nanofiber membrane for high-performance Li-S full cells. InfoMat 4, e12294 (2022).
Chung, S., Luo, L. & Manthiram, A. TiS2–polysulfide hybrid cathode with high sulfur loading and low electrolyte consumption for lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 568–573 (2018).
Xue, W. et al. Intercalation-conversion hybrid cathodes enabling Li–S full-cell architectures with jointly superior gravimetric and volumetric energy densities. Nat. Energy 4, 374–382 (2019).
Kohl, M., Borrmann, F., Althues, H. & Kaskel, S. Hard carbon anodes and novel electrolytes for long-cycle-life room temperature sodium-sulfur full cell batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502185 (2016).
Kim, I. et al. A singular flexible cathode for room temperature sodium/sulfur battery. J. Power Sources 307, 31–37 (2016).
Wang, Y. et al. Achieving high-performance room-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries with S@Interconnected mesoporous carbon hollow nanospheres. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 16576–16579 (2016).
Yu, X. & Manthiram, A. Capacity enhancement and discharge mechanisms of room-temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. ChemElectroChem 1, 1275–1280 (2014).
Zhang, E. et al. Single-atom yttrium engineering Janus electrode for rechargeable Na–S batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 18995–19007 (2022).
Zhou, X. et al. A high‐efficiency Mo2C electrocatalyst promoting the polysulfide redox kinetics for Na–S batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2200479 (2022).
Yang, H. et al. Architecting freestanding sulfur cathodes for superior room-temperature Na–S batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2102280 (2021).
Fang, D. et al. Low-coordinated Zn–N2 sites as bidirectional atomic catalysis for room-temperature Na–S batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 26650–26659 (2023).
Wang, N. et al. High-performance room-temperature sodium–sulfur battery enabled by electrocatalytic sodium polysulfides full conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 562–570 (2020).
Aslam, M. K. et al. Metal chalcogenide hollow polar bipyramid prisms as efficient sulfur hosts for Na-S batteries. Nat. Commun. 11, 5242 (2020).
Zhang, S. et al. Mo2N–W2N heterostructures embedded in spherical carbon superstructure as highly efficient polysulfide electrocatalysts for stable room‐temperature Na–S batteries. Adv. Mater. 33, 2103846 (2021).
He, J., Bhargav, A., Shin, W. & Manthiram, A. Stable dendrite-free sodium–sulfur batteries enabled by a localized high-concentration electrolyte. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 20241–20248 (2021).
Wang, Y. et al. Li intercalation in an MoSe2 electrocatalyst: in situ observation and modulation of its precisely controllable phase engineering for a high‐performance flexible Li‐S battery. Carbon Energy 5, e255 (2023).
Lin, G. et al. P–P orbital interaction enables single-crystalline semimetallic β-MoTe2 nanosheets as efficient electrocatalysts for lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 55616–55626 (2022).
Liu, H. et al. Sustainable S cathodes with synergic electrocatalysis for room-temperature Na–S batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 9, 566–574 (2021).
Liu, H. et al. Electrocatalyzing S cathodes via multisulfiphilic sites for superior room-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 14, 7259–7268 (2020).
Wang, Y. et al. Tunable electrocatalytic behavior of sodiated MoS2 active sites toward efficient sulfur redox reactions in room‐temperature Na–S batteries. Adv. Mater. 33, 2100229 (2021).
Yan, Z. et al. A high‐kinetics sulfur cathode with a highly efficient mechanism for superior room‐temperature Na–S batteries. Adv. Mater. 32, 1906700 (2020).
Bai, J. et al. Self-assembled MoTe2 hierarchical nanoflowers with carbon coating as anode material for excellent sodium storage performance. Chem. Eng. J. 452, 139111 (2023).
El-Mahalawy, S. H. & Evans, B. L. Temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity and hall coefficient in 2H-MoS2, MoSe2, WSe2, and MoTe2. Phys. Status Solidi B 79, 713–722 (1977).
Panda, M. R. et al. Blocks of molybdenum ditelluride: a high rate anode for sodium-ion battery and full cell prototype study. Nano Energy 64, 103951 (2019).
Qi, Y. et al. A Fe3N/carbon composite electrocatalyst for effective polysulfides regulation in room-temperature Na-S batteries. Nat. Commun. 12, 6347 (2021).
Su, L. et al. Multiscale operando X-ray investigations provide insights into electro-chemo-mechanical behavior of lithium intercalation cathodes. Appl. Energy 299, 117315 (2021).
Su, L. et al. Tailoring electrode–electrolyte interfaces in lithium-ion batteries using molecularly engineered functional polymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 9919–9931 (2021).
He, J., Chen, Y. & Manthiram, A. Metal sulfide‐decorated carbon sponge as a highly efficient electrocatalyst and absorbant for polysulfide in high‐loading Li2S batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1900584 (2019).
Toby, B. H. & Von Dreele, R. B. GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 544–549 (2013).
Su, L. et al. Designing reliable electrochemical cells for operando lithium-ion battery study. MethodsX 8, 101562 (2021).
Xu, X. et al. A room-temperature sodium–sulfur battery with high capacity and stable cycling performance. Nat. Commun. 9, 3870 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering under award number DE-SC0005397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.H. designed, performed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. A.B. performed the high-loading coin cell experiments. H.C. and L.S. performed the Synchrotron operando XRD and corresponding analysis. A.M. supervised the project and edited the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Weijiang Xue, Sundara Ramaprabhu, and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
He, J., Bhargav, A., Su, L. et al. Intercalation-type catalyst for non-aqueous room temperature sodium-sulfur batteries. Nat Commun 14, 6568 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42383-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42383-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.