Abstract
Inter-organ crosstalk has gained increasing attention in recent times; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we elucidate an endocrine pathway that is regulated by skeletal muscle interferon regulatory factor (IRF) 4, which manipulates liver pathology. Skeletal muscle specific IRF4 knockout (F4MKO) mice exhibited ameliorated hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis, without changes in body weight, when put on a nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) diet. Proteomics analysis results suggested that follistatin-like protein 1 (FSTL1) may constitute a link between muscles and the liver. Dual luciferase assays showed that IRF4 can transcriptionally regulate FSTL1. Further, inducing FSTL1 expression in the muscles of F4MKO mice is sufficient to restore liver pathology. In addition, co-culture experiments confirmed that FSTL1 plays a distinct role in various liver cell types via different receptors. Finally, we observed that the serum FSTL1 level is positively correlated with NASH progression in humans. These data indicate a signaling pathway involving IRF4-FSTL1-DIP2A/CD14, that links skeletal muscle cells to the liver in the pathogenesis of NASH.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterized by liver steatosis, inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning injury, and varying degrees of fibrosis1,2,3. NASH is associated with a higher risk of progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and is associated with metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome4,5. Increased physical conditioning has been observed to potentially improve hepatic metabolism independent of an individual’s body weight6. Apart from adipose tissue function and other targets of insulin activity, skeletal muscle physiology is closely integrated with overall energy homeostasis and calorie disposal. Skeletal muscle, acting as an endocrine organ, can secrete various myokines that affect other metabolic tissues, including liver tissue7. While some myokines (e.g., IL-6, myostatin, and activin) have been found to play roles in liver steatosis, fibrosis, and cancer8,9,10,11,12, many others are yet to be comprehensively investigated.
Interferon regulatory factor (IRF) 4, a member of the IRF family, is known for its role in the regulation of immune cell development and function13,14. It is also a transcriptional regulator of lipolytic genes in adipose tissue15,16, and partners with the co-activator PGC-1α in regulating thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue (BAT)17,18. Recently, we found that skeletal muscle-specific IRF4 knockout (F4MKO) mice fed a chow diet exhibited normal body weight and insulin sensitivity, but increased exercise capacity19. However, when put on a high-fat diet (HFD), F4MKO mice appeared to be protected from diet-induced obesity, and showed improved glucose tolerance and increased insulin sensitivity20. Further investigations are needed to determine whether the ablation of IRF4 in skeletal muscle would affect liver metabolism, given that insulin resistance in skeletal muscles has been linked to increased hepatic de novo lipogenesis and hepatic steatosis in the elderly21.
Follistatin-like protein 1 (FSTL1), a secretory glycoprotein, is a potential target for steatosis-associated liver fibrosis22. Macrophage FSTL1 has been shown to promote liver fibrosis by inducing M1 polarization and inflammation23. The overexpression of Fstl1 in the liver could promote the expression of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-624. Silencing Fstl1 using shRNA can reduce Col1a1 mRNA expression and macrophage accumulation in carbon tetrachloride injury-mediated liver fibrosis in mice25. Meanwhile, FSTL1 has been identified as a muscle-derived secretory myokine7,26, and skeletal muscle is a major source of circulating FSTL127. Dynamic resistance exercise was found to increase the expression of skeletal muscle-derived FSTL1, which can supplement the insufficiency of cardiac FSTL1 expression, induce cardiac angiogenesis, and promote cardiac rehabilitation in myocardial infarction rats26. Although FSTL1 has various functions, it remains unclear which receptors are required for FSTL1-mediated inflammatory responses, lipid metabolism, and fibrosis in the liver.
Inter-organ crosstalk has gained increasing attention recently. In this study, we proposed a signaling pathway that potentially regulates the communication between skeletal muscle and the liver, especially in NASH models. First, we found that IRF4 expression was significantly upregulated in the skeletal muscle of NASH mice. Second, F4MKO mice showed ameliorated hepatic pathology when administered a NASH diet. Third, proteomics analysis and dual luciferase assays results indicated that FSTL1 acts as a myokine that mediates this crosstalk. Moreover, findings from cell co-culture experiments suggested that DIP2A and CD14 could be receptors of FSTL1 in the liver to mediate its function. Lastly, the serum FSTL1 level was increased in patients with NASH compared with that in healthy individuals. Taken together, these results revealed a signaling pathway from skeletal muscles to the liver via the IRF4-FSTL1-DIP2A/CD14 pathway in the pathogenesis of NASH.
Results
Ablation of IRF4 expression in skeletal muscles ameliorated NASH
To confirm whether IRF4 expression was altered in the skeletal muscles of the NASH model, we measured the mRNA and protein expression levels in skeletal muscle and liver tissues from high-glucose and high-fat-diet-fed NASH mouse models. IRF4 protein and mRNA expression was increased in the gastrocnemius (GAS) (Fig. 1a, b), without significant changes in the liver of NASH mice (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). As exercise can attenuate the NASH phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 1c–e), IRF4 expression was found to be decreased in GAS in NASH mice subjected to exercise (Fig. 1c, d). These results indicated that skeletal muscle IRF4 expression was associated with the hepatic pathology of NASH.
To investigate whether the ablation of IRF4 in skeletal muscles ameliorated NASH progression, we generated skeletal muscle-specific IRF4 knockout (F4MKO) mice, as previously described19. Male mice were then fed a Western diet and high-fructose diet for 24 weeks to induce NASH, as reported before28. No differences in body weight and liver weight were observed between F4MKO and Flox mice (Supplementary Fig. 1f–h) fed the NASH diet. Liver tissue morphology and H&E staining results showed a mild difference in hepatic steatosis (Fig. 1e, f, Supplementary Fig. 1i). Moreover, unlike HFD-fed mice20, the F4MKO mice showed no changes in fat and muscle depots compared with Flox mice (Supplementary Fig. 1j, k). Similarly, no changes were observed in oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), and energy expenditure (EE) (Supplementary Fig. 1l–o). GAS fiber type-related genes and H&E staining also did not reveal any changes in the muscle fiber type or muscle cross-sectional area (Supplementary Fig. 1p, q). This was further illustrated by the NASH/NAFLD activity score (NAS score) in the liver of Flox and F4MKO mice (Fig. 1f). In addition, we observed that F4MKO mice showed lower serum ALT and AST levels (Fig. 1g, h), which were indicators of liver damage. Collectively, these data suggested that deletion of IRF4 in skeletal muscles could improve NASH progression. The amelioration of hepatic steatosis and liver damage was also observed in female mice (Supplementary Fig. 1r–t).
F4MKO mice showed a reduction in lipid accumulation, lower inflammation levels, and decreased fibrosis when fed the NASH diet
To further investigate the potential hepatic pathologies, we assessed lipid metabolism, inflammation, macrophage infiltration, and fibrosis in F4MKO and control mice. As anticipated, the levels of triglycerides and cholesterol were lower in the liver of F4MKO mice (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 2a, b), whereas the level of plasma triglycerides and cholesterol did not change (Supplementary Fig. 2c, d). Concomitant with this, lipogenic genes (Srebp1c, Scd1, Nr1h3, Fas) were downregulated in the liver of F4MKO mice compared with that in control mice, whereas fatty acid oxidation genes (Pparα, Cpt1a) were upregulated (Fig. 2b). To address macrophage infiltration in the liver, we measured F4/80+ Kupffer cells/macrophages in the liver. F4/80+ staining showed that there were fewer F4/80+-positive cells in F4MKO mice than in control mice (Fig. 2c). In addition, the M1 macrophage maker gene Nos2 was decreased and M2 marker genes Clec10a was upregulated. In line with this, the inflammatory genes Il-6, Il-1β, and Tnf were downregulated and anti-inflammatory gene Il-10 was upregulated in samples obtained from F4MKO mice (Fig. 2d). Furthermore, liver fibrosis was suppressed in the samples of F4MKO mice assessed by Sirius Red staining, along with the downregulation of key genes of fibrosis (Acat2, Col1a1, Col1a2, Timp2, and Tgfβ) (Fig. 2e, f).
Next, we assessed whether skeletal muscle tissues from F4MKO mice could directly regulate liver function by using a co-culture system (Supplementary Fig. 2e). We first generated cells to mimic NASH in vivo by treating hepatocytes and macrophages with palmitic acid (PA), and treating HSC-T6 cells with TGFβ (Supplementary Fig. 2f–i). When primary hepatocytes were co-cultured with GAS from F4MKO or control mice, lipid droplet accumulation was found to decrease (Fig. 2g), and the cellular TG level also decreased significantly in the F4MKO group relative to that in the control group (Fig. 2h). This phenomenon was also observed in HepG2 and AML12 cells (Supplementary Fig. 2j–m). In addition, the expression of inflammation-related genes in macrophages and fibrosis in HSC-T6 cells decreased when the cells were co-cultured with GAS from F4MKO mice (Fig. 2i, j). These data indicated that IRF4-specific knockout in skeletal muscles led to a reduction in lipid accumulation, inflammation, and fibrosis in liver tissues and in cells in vitro.
The expression of FSTL1, a myokine, was decreased in F4MKO mice and transcriptionally regulated by IRF4
The co-culture system indicated that skeletal muscles can directly communicate with liver tissues. We performed serum proteomics using samples from F4MKO and control mice and identified 376 differentially expressed proteins corresponding to a fold change >1.5 or fold change <0.67. This included 194 upregulated proteins and 182 downregulated proteins (Supplementary Fig. 3a). We then compared genes encoding these proteins with those differently expressed genes identified in our previous F4MKO muscle RNA-seq data20, and identified 15 overlapping downregulated and three overlapping upregulated genes (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Next, we overlapped these 18 proteins with myokines obtained from public literature29, identifying 12 downregulated and one upregulated myokine (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d). To further identify changes in these 13 myokines secreted by skeletal muscles, we examined these genes expression in the GAS of F4MKO NASH mouse models. We just found that Decorin, Fibronectin1, Fstl1, and Mmp2 were significantly downregulated in the GAS of F4MKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 3e). Fstl1, Mmp2, and Decorin expression was reported to be associated with NASH23,30,31. However, Mmp2 and Decorin exhibit a protective role on NASH, downregulation is likely to worsen NASH pathology30,31. Fstl1 was reported to promote fibrosis in the liver and Fibronectin 1 was expression important for the extracellular matrix23,32. We thus choose Fstl1 as a candidate that linked the muscle and liver tissues in our models. Meanwhile, we found that the protein expression of FSTL1 did not change in the GAS F4MKO mice fed a normal chow diet, whereas it decreased significantly in the GAS, soleus, and quadriceps of F4MKO mice under NASH model conditions (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 4a–c); the same was observed with plasma FSTL1 (Fig. 3c). Consistent with this, FSTL1 expression was higher in the GAS of NASH mice but lower in the GAS of NASH mice subjected to exercise (Fig. 3b).
We then assessed whether Fstl1 expression was transcriptionally regulated by IRF4. We constructed luciferase reporter genes containing different segments of the FSTL1 promoter and co-transfected them into 293T cells with pCDH-GFP or pCDH-IRF4. IRF4 increased the activity of the FSTL1 promoter in the −1520 to +76 region, whereas IRF4 had no effect on the activity of the promoter in the −1122 to +76 region, indicating that the element responsible for the action of IRF4 on FSTL1 promoter was positioned between bases −1520 and −1122 (Fig. 3d). Next, we analyzed the FSTL1 promoter between −1520 and −1122 using an online tool for predicting the interaction between promoters and transcription factors (http://jaspar.genereg.net). We subsequently identified three potential binding sites of IRF4 (ISRE) within this region of the FSTL1 promoter. We then constructed three mutant reporter genes with a disrupted ISRE motif, and re-conducted the dual-luciferase reporter assay. IRF4 exerted no effect on the FSTL1 promoter with the three different mutations (Fig. 3e). The data suggested that IRF4 manipulates FSTL1 expression by enhancing the activity of the FSTL1 promoter. Furthermore, the −1520 to −1122 region is responsible for this effect. Chip-qPCR results further confirmed that IRF4 was bound to the −1520 to 1122 region of FSTL1 promoter (Fig. 3f).
Skeletal muscle-derived FSTL1 was responsible for IRF4-mediated NASH progression
To verify whether FSTL1 mediates IRF4’s effects in liver cells in vivo, we induced the overexpression of FSTL1 directly in the GAS of mice using adenovirus-associated virus (AAV) delivery. Flox and F4MKO mice were first modeled with NASH. After 24-week NASH modeling, AAV-FSTL1, tagged with flag, was injected into the GAS. After 4 weeks of the AAV injection, the mRNA expression of FSTL1 in GAS was increased significantly in the AAV-FSTL1-treated group (Supplementary Fig. 4d), and the FSTL1 protein levels in GAS and serum also increased significantly (Fig. 4a, b). The circulating FSTL1 level also increased significantly (Fig. 4c). We observed that the FSTL1 level in the liver increased after AAV injection (Supplementary Fig. 4e), but the FSTL1 mRNA expression in the liver remained unchanged (Supplementary Fig. 4f), indicating that FSTL1 was secreted from the GAS and moved to the liver. There were no differences in the body, GAS, and liver weight among Flox, F4MKO, and F4MKO + FSTL1 mice (Supplementary Fig. 3g–k) fed the NASH diet. Liver tissue H&E staining showed that the degree of steatosis and inflammation in F4MKO mice injected with AAV-FSTL1 were similar to that observed in Flox mice (Fig. 4d), which was further illustrated by the NAS scores of the liver tissue of Flox, F4MKO, and F4MKO + FSTL1 mice (Fig. 4e). In addition, the F4MKO + FSTL1 mice exhibited higher serum ALT and AST levels (Fig. 4f, g). These data suggested that skeletal muscle-derived FSTL1 contributed to the amelioration of hepatic pathology in F4MKO mice.
Furthermore, we induced FSTL1 knockdown in both the liver and GAS using AAV. FSTL1 knockdown in the GAS (GFSTL1-KD) did not result in any significant improvement in circulating triglyceride level, hepatic lipid accumulation, or hepatic damage (Supplementary Fig. 5a, c–e). However, we observed a mild reduction in liver fibrosis in GFSTL1-KD mice assessed by Sirius Red staining (Supplementary Fig. 5b). In addition, the expression of key genes associated with fibrosis (Acat2 and Col1a1) was also found to be lowered (Supplementary Fig. 5f). However, we did not observe any significant effects on the NASH phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 5g–k) upon FSTL1 knockdown in the liver. These results provided further confirmation that FSTL1 derived from skeletal muscle plays a dominant role in the NASH pathology phenotype.
FSTL1 overexpression of counteracted the effects on the liver induced upon the ablation of skeletal muscle IRF4
To test whether FSTL1 mediates the effect of disrupted IRF4 expression in skeletal muscles on NASH progression, we performed the transcriptome analysis of liver tissues in Flox, F4MKO, and F4MKO + FSTL1 mice. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) pathway was repressed in F4MKO mice compared with that in control mice. Upon injection with AAV-FSTL1, the NAFLD pathway was activated relative to that in AAV-GFP-injected F4MKO mice (Fig. 5a, b). Next, we verified that skeletal muscle-derived FSTL1-mediated NASH progression with regards to hepatic lipid metabolism, fibrosis, and inflammation in vivo when specific IRF4 deletion was induced in skeletal muscles. First, we found that triglyceride content was significantly lowered in the liver of F4MKO mice but increased in the liver of AAV-FSTL1-injected F4MKO mice (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Fig. 6a). Consistent with this, key genes associated with lipogenesis were downregulated in F4MKO mice, but their expression was restored in F4MKO + FSTL1 mice (Fig. 5d). Second, we checked the degree of inflammation in the liver. F4/80 staining showed that there were less kupffer cells in F4MKO than in control mice, whereas the number of cells was greater in F4MKO mice injected with AAV-FSTL1 (Fig. 5e). Moreover, the expression of inflammatory genes, such as Il-6, Il-1β, Tnf, and Il-10 was reversed in F4MKO mice injected with AAV-FSTL1 (Fig. 5f). Third, Sirius Red staining showed that the degree of fibrosis in the liver was similar to that in control and F4MKO + FSTL1 groups but decreased in the F4MKO group (Fig. 5g). QPCR analysis revealed the same changes in the expression patterns of fibrosis-related genes (Fig. 5h).
In addition, recombinant protein-FSTL1 (rFSTL1) increased the TG concentration in primary hepatocytes and HepG2 cells treated with PA, but not the basal levels (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c). Since FSTL1 was downregulated in F4MKO mice, we added rFSTL1 into the co-culture system. In the primary hepatocyte steatosis cell model, rFSTL1 restored the cellular TG levels and lipid accumulation in cells co-cultured with GAS from F4MKO mice (Fig. 5i). rFSTL1 exerted the same effect in an HepG2 steatosis cell model (Supplementary Fig. 6d). Meanwhile, we tested the effects of rFSTL1 in macrophage cells (Supplementary Fig. 6e–h). rFSTL1 counteracted inflammatory gene expression in macrophages co-cultured with GAS from F4MKO mice (Fig. 5j). Consistent with this, rFSTL1 reversed liver fibrosis gene expression in HSC-T6 cells co-cultured with GAS from F4MKO mice (Fig. 5k, Supplementary Fig. 6i–m). In conclusion, FSTL1 overexpression could counteract the effects of skeletal muscle IRF4 ablation in steatosis, fibrosis, and inflammation in NASH mice.
Skeletal muscle IRF4 regulated liver metabolism via FSTL1-DIP2A/CD14
To screen the receptors of FSTL1 that is/are responsible for the liver phenotypes in F4MKO mice, we measured the expression of their transcripts. Twelve receptors were reported to be related to FSTL133,34,35,36. According to sc-RNA-Seq data from human and mouse livers, these 12 receptors were expressed in different patterns in different cell types (Supplementary Fig. 7a–d)37,38,39,40. We then measured the expression of these receptors in our models. The expression of seven receptors was altered in F4MKO mice; these were including Cd14, Dip2a, Eng, Bmpr2, Tgfbr1, Tgfbr2, and Bmpr1b (Supplementary Fig. 7e). Given that the Bmpr1b transcript was not detected in mouse NASH liver sc-RNA-Seq (Supplementary Fig. 7d), we designed the shRNA of the remaining six receptors to further clarify how FSTL1 regulates liver metabolism. We used mouse AML12 hepatocytes, hepatic stellate HSC-T6 cell, and a macrophage cell line, which were infected with an shRNA lentivirus to knockdown the receptors of FSTL1 (Supplementary Figs. 8a, 9a, 10a). Surprisingly, rFSTL1 increased lipid accumulation in AML12 cells, but the effects were only blocked by shDip2a and shCd14 and not by other receptors (Supplementary Fig. 8b–g). The blockade of Dip2a and Cd14 in AML12 cells did not result in any changes in the expression of the other receptors (Supplementary Fig. 8h, i). Again, we found that inflammatory gene expression was increased in macrophage cells treated with rFSTL1, whereas the expression of these genes normalized when the cells were infected with shCd14 (Supplementary Fig. 9b–g). Similarly, when Cd14 knockdown in macrophage cells did not cause changes in other receptors (Supplementary Fig. 9h). Combining these findings with the sc-RNA-Seq data, we selected four to six receptors (Eng, Bmpr2, Tgfbr2, and Dip2a) that showed a change in expression patterns in NASH HSCs. The fibrosis-related genes were upregulated in rFSTL1 supplement cells but downregulated only in shDip2a infected cells (Supplementary Fig. 10b–e). However, the expression of other receptors did not change in HSC-T6 cells infected with shDip2a (Supplementary Fig. 10f).
To identify the receptor that contributes to the effects of the skeletal muscle IRF4-FSTL1 axis on the liver, co-culture experiments were carried out. FSTL1 could not restore cellular lipid accumulation and lipid metabolism gene expression in Dip2a or Cd14 knockdown AML12 steatosis cells co-cultured with GAS from F4MKO mice (Fig. 6a–h). Moreover, following Cd14 knockdown in macrophages and Dip2a knockdown in HSC-T6, rFSTL1 was unable to reverse inflammation-related gene expression in macrophages and fibrosis-related gene expression in HSC-T6 cells co-cultured with GAS from F4MKO mice (Fig. 6i–r). Collectively, these data suggest that skeletal muscle IRF4 regulates lipid metabolism, fibrosis, and inflammation via FSTL1-DIP2A/CD14. To further validate these results in vivo, we used AAV delivery to directly block both Dip2a and Cd14 expression in the liver inducing the overexpression of FSTL1 in the GAS. FSTL1 could not rescue hepatic damage, lipid accumulation, and fibrosis when both Dip2a and Cd14 were knocked down in the liver (Fig. 6s–w). In summary, these data revealed that skeletal muscle IRF4 regulates NASH progression through the FSTL1-DIP2A/CD14 pathway.
The serum FSTL1 level was associated with hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in humans
To determine whether the serum FSTL1 level associated with liver pathology in humans, we analyzed specimens from 43 healthy participants, 43 patients with steatosis, 41 patients with early NASH and 53 with advanced NASH. The demographic characteristics are presented in Fig. 7a. Although the FSTL1 level did not vary by age, BMI, plasma TG level, free fatty acid (FFA) levels, or cholesterol levels, we observed a significant positive correlation between FSTL1 expression and liver pathologies (steatosis, ballooning, fibrosis, and NAS) (Fig. 7b–d). Notably, the plasma FSTL1 level was also correlated with glucose levels or HbA1c (Fig. 7e–g). Nonetheless, the Fstl1 mRNA level in liver biopsies from patients with NASH was significantly lower than that in controls (Fig. 7h, i). This, suggested that the increased plasma FSTL1 level in patients with NASH might be owing to FSTL1 secretion from other tissues, such as skeletal muscles, as shown in the present study. Consistent with the level of FSTL1 in the liver, the expression of its receptors was decreased in the liver from patients with NASH in our study as well as in other studies41 (Fig. 7h, i, Supplementary Fig. 11). Our data thus strongly suggested a model in which skeletal muscle IRF4 transcriptionally regulates FSTL1, and the latter is secreted in the liver to mediate liver metabolism through DIP2A/CD14, eventually affecting the pathology of NASH (Fig. 7j).
Discussion
The association between the pathogenesis and natural course of NASH and skeletal muscle dysfunction has been recognized widely in recent times. Here, we showed that skeletal muscle plays a role in the progression of NASH via the IRF4-FSTL1-DIP2A/CD14 axis (Fig. 7j). Surprisingly, IRF4 expression was higher in skeletal muscles, but not in the liver tissues, in NASH models. IRF4-specific deletion in skeletal muscle alleviated steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in the liver. These effects were mediated by a myokine named FSTL1, which exerts its function through DIP2A and CD14 in the liver. Importantly, serum FSTL1 expression is positively correlated with NASH progression in humans. Skeletal muscles are a major reservoir for secreted FSTL1, as addressed in other studies27. Our findings suggest a novel pathway that plays a role in the communication between skeletal muscles and the liver, which are potential drug targets in metabolic diseases.
Of note, IRF4 was shown to play a key role in the development and function of immune cells14,42. We have described that IRF4 expression in fat induces catabolic effects (increased lipolysis, anti-lipogenesis, and increased M2 macrophage abundance)15,43, and the overexpression of IRF4 in skeletal muscle favors diet induced-obesity20. Recently, we addressed that F4MKO mice are obesity-resistant and exhibit enhanced energy expenditure, insulin sensitivity, and exercise capacity19,20. Weight loss can help alleviate lipid-induced hepatocellular injury by mobilizing fat from the liver. However, limited information is available about such phenomena in the absence of weight loss, especially with respect to alterations in hepatic fat metabolism. Here, F4MKO mice fed the NASH diet showed an improvement in hepatic injury without body weight changes. Upon further investigation, IRF4 was found to transcriptionally regulate FSTL1 expression in skeletal muscle, the latter being secreted in the liver to exert its function on liver cells.
Skeletal muscles act as endocrine organs, secreting various myokines that affect other metabolic tissues, including the liver7. The insufficient or excessive secretion of myokines may regulate steatosis, inflammation, or fibrosis in the liver. FSTL1 is a myokine that mediates the function of IRF4s function in the liver. The serum FSTL1 level is positively correlated with NASH in humans. rFSTL1 treatment increases lipid accumulation in hepatocytes, enhances fibrosis in HSCs, and augments inflammatory gene expression in macrophages. However, FSTL1 expression is reported to be induced by dynamic resistance exercise and promotes cardiac rehabilitation in MI rats26. The controversial function of FSTL1 may be attributed to the post-translational modification of FSTL1. For example, in the sequence of mouse Fstl1, three potential sites are present for N-glycosylation and two potential sites are present for O-glycosylation. Glycosylation at these sites leads to cell-type specificity44. The activation of various signaling pathways through different receptors is likely responsible for that: the protective role of FSTL1 in the heart is mediated via DIP2A in MI rats26. In this study, not only DIP2A but also CD14 was found to responsible for the role of FSTL1 in the liver. However, the fact that additional endogenous or exogenous factors are involved in the regulation process cannot be ignored.
In addition, the circulating levels of FSTL1 were found to be elevated in patients with various diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases35,45,46, and liver disease22,41. In line with previous findings, our findings showed that FSTL1 concentrations were increased in patients with NASH. However, the mRNA levels of Fstl1 in the liver of patients with NASH were found to be lowered in our study, which was consistent with previous findings from transcriptome sequencing experiments41. Collectively, our findings, combined with previous results, suggest that muscle-derived FSTL1 is involved in the regulation of NASH development. This hypothesis is further supported by the following lines of evidence from in vitro and in vivo experiments. First, FSTL1 knockdown in the liver did not affect NASH progression. Second, FSTL1 knockdown in muscle partially alleviated NASH phenotypes, indicating that muscle-derived FSTL1 plays an essential role in the development of NASH. Third, findings from in vitro studies showed that recombinant FSTL1 protein could rescue the steatosis cell phenotype. Finally, in our model, replenishing FSTL1 in muscle effectively restored the NASH phenotypes induced by the reduction of FSTL1 expression resulting from IRF4 knockout in muscle. Thus, muscle-derived FSTL1 plays a major role in the regulation of NASH. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that IRF4 expressed in skeletal muscle plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of NASH through the FSTL1-DIP2A/CD14 pathway. Targeting this signaling pathway could serve as an attractive strategy for NASH management.
However, there are several limitations of this study. First, our study used high cholesterol content (1.25%) in the NASH diet, whether other NASH diets can obtain the same conclusion is worthy of further investigation. Second, we knockdown FSTL1 only in GAS but no other skeletal muscles, which may be not enough to mimic the effect of Mly1-cre/FSTL1. Third, we investigated the effect of FSTL1 on aggravated NASH induced by IRF4 muscle knockout mice, but the precise molecular mechanism of how FSTL1-DIP2A/CD14 pathway regulates liver metabolism need to be investigated in the future.
Methods
Animals
Mice were maintained under a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle at constant temperature (23 °C) and humidity (50–60%) with free access to food and water. The muscle-specific IRF4 knockout mice were generated as previous reported, detailed protocols and information regarding the establishment have been described previously19. All animals received humane care according to the criteria outlined in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The animal experiments abide by the ARRIVE guidelines. All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai University of Sport (102772022DW019).
Animal experiment design
C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Gempharmatech Co., Ltd (Nanjing, China). The mice were allowed to acclimate to the living environment for 7 days prior to the start of all experiments.
Animal experiment design 1#
The 8-week-old Wild-type male mice (total 16), five of them were used as normal controls (con), the others were established a NASH model by feeding the mice with a high fat and high carbohydrate diet (42% kcal/fat, 42.7% kcal/carbohydrate, 15.2%/protein, 41% wt sucrose, 7.5% wt maltodextrin, 3.5% wt mineral mix) and containing 1.25% wt cholesterol (TD 120528, Teklad Custom Diet) with a high fructose-glucose solution (23.1 g/L d-fructose +18.9 g/L d-glucose), as previously described47,48,49. After 24-week of treatment, NASH mice were randomly divided into 2 groups, NASH group (NASH) and NASH combined with exercise group (NASH + Exe). NASH + Exe group mice were underwent 8 weeks of moderate intensity exercise intervention as previous reported50. After 8-weeks exercise treatment, livers and gastrocnemius were collected from these mice to perform histological and molecular biological analysis.
Animal experiment design 2#
To investigate whether ablation of IRF4 in skeletal muscle would ameliorate NASH progression, we generated skeletal muscle-specific IRF4 knockout (F4MKO) mice. The male and female Flox and F4MKO mice were established NASH model for 24-week. After the NASH modeling period, the liver tissues were collected for the examination of diet-induced NASH in Flox and F4MKO mice.
Animal experiment design 3#
To specifically overexpressed FSTL1 in GAS in vivo experiments, the adeno-associated virus serotype 8 (AAV8)-muscle creatine kinase (MCK) encoding full-length FSTL1 sequences (AAV-FSTL1) delivery system was established. After 24-weeks NASH modeling, AAV-MCK promoter-FSTL1 tagged with Flag, was injected to gastrocnemius. After 4-weeks AAV injection, the liver tissue samples were collected from mice to detect corresponding histological, biochemical and molecular biological analysis.
Animal experiment design 4#
To construct a special knockdown of FSTL1 in vivo, AAV packaged a short hairpin RNA target FSTL1 was generated with a standard molecular procedure. And injected into male NASH mice via tail vein or directly into the gastrocnemius to achieve FSTL1 knockdown in liver or gastrocnemius, respectively. After 4-weeks AAV injection, the blood and liver tissues were collected to assess the effect of FSTL1 knockdown in the liver and muscle on the progression of NASH.
Animal experiment design 5#
To further validate that skeletal muscle IRF4 regulates lipid metabolism, fibrosis, and inflammation via FSTL1-DIP2A/CD14 in vivo, we constructed a special knockdown of Dip2a and Cd14 in vivo as described in model 4#. And the AAV of Dip2a and Cd14 were injected into male F4MKO mice via tail vein, based on overexpressed of FSTL1 in the GAS. After recovery for 4 weeks, the blood and liver tissues were subjected to histological analysis and biochemical analysis.
Human subjects
All subjects were from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. A liver biopsy was performed according to the EASL–EASD–EASO clinical practice guidelines to evaluate the severity of liver histology51. NAFLD was histologically diagnosed by the presence of ≧5% hepatic steatosis; NAFL was histologically diagnosed by the presence of steatosis without ballooning or lobular inflammation; NASH was histologically diagnosed by the joint presence of steatosis, ballooning, and lobular inflammation51. The NAFLD activity score (NAS) and the steatosis, activity, and fibrosis score (SAF) were used to quantify the severity of liver steatosis, ballooning, inflammation, and fibrosis based on liver histology52,53. NASH with fibrosis score <2 was defined as early NASH (eNASH) and NASH with fibrosis score ≧2 was defined as fibrotic NASH (fNASH)51. The competing etiologies (chronic viral hepatitis, hypothyroidism, excessive alcohol consumption, drugs leading to steatosis) of steatosis were ruled out based on laboratory examination and liver histology. Subjects with (1) age <17 years old; (2) type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), gestational diabetes, and other specific types of diabetes; (3) acute complications of diabetes; (4) severe renal disease or abnormal renal function (Cr≧115 µmol/L); or (5) history of malignant tumor, severe mental illness, or parenteral nutrition were excluded.
Finally, a total of 180 adult subjects (43 control, 43 NAFL, 41 eNASH, and 53 fNASH subjects) were included in this study. All subjects underwent routine physical measurements, blood biochemical tests, and medical history records as previously described54. All protocols were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975 and approved by the ethics committee of the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, and each subject provided written informed consent.
Liver histology
Liver tissues were fixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 24 h, embedded in paraffin. Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) (hematoxylin, E607317-0500; eosin, E607321-0100, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) staining was performed on paraffin-embedded tissues to visualize the pattern of lipid accumulation. Oil Red O (E607319-0010; Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) staining was performed on optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (4583, Sakura, Torrance, CA)-embedded frozen liver sections to visualize lipid droplet accumulation. Sirius red (PH1098; Scientific Phygene, Beijing, China) staining was performed to detect liver fibrosis with standard techniques. F4/80 (Proteintech) staining was performed to detect liver lobule inflammation. Moreover, to characterize the hepatocytes lipid accumulation, bodipy (Sigma) immunofluorescence of primary hepatocytes, HepG2, and AML12 cells was performed. Histological features were observed and captured with a light microscope (OLYMPUS DP80, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Cell lines, culture conditions, and transfection
Human HEK 293T cells, human HepG2 cells, Rat HSC-T6 cells and mouse RAW264.7 macrophage cells were cultured in DMEM/H (Gibco) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco), and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (P/S, Gibco), in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. Mouse AML12 were grown in DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS, 1% P/S, and 1% ITS Liquid Media Supplement (Gibco, 51300044) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. Polyethylenimine (PolySciences, 23966) was used for transfecting according to the instructions of manufacturer.
Isolation of primary hepatocytes
Primary hepatocytes were isolated by the collagenase perfusion method as described previously55. The isolated hepatocytes were enriched by Percoll gradient centrifugation. Then cultured in William’s E Medium containing 10% FBS and antibiotics on collagen-coated plates. After overnight incubation (16 h), the culture medium was refreshed.
Protein extraction and western blot analysis
Proteins were extracted with RIPA buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, China)) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Beyotime Biotechnology, China)) and were quantified using Rapid BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Western blot analysis was performed as previously described19. Briefly, 40 μg lysate was loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels, blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, USA), and incubated with antibodies. The primary antibodies used in this work including anti-IRF4 (Proteintech, 11247-2-AP, dilution 1:1000), anti-FSTL1 (Abcam, ab71548, dilution 1:1000), anti-β-Tubulin (Abclonal, AC008, dilution 1:5000), anti-GAPDH (Abways, AB0037, dilution 1:5000), anti-flag (Abclonal, AE005, dilution 1:2000).
Analysis of gene expression by quantitative real-time PCR
TRIzol method (Thermo Fisher) was used to extract total RNA from tissues and cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1 μg RNA was converted into cDNA using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher), and QPCR was performed with a QuantStudio™ 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher) using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Accurate Biology) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Tbp or18s was used as the endogenous control.
Plasmids construction
Encoding small hairpin RNA targeting FSTL1 receptor, was constructed by inserting small hairpin RNA sequence into the AgeI/EcoRI site of pLKO.1-puro (Addgene), detailed shRNA sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
AAV-FSTL1 production, purification, and injection
AAV8-MCK promoter-FSTL1 was produced and purified by OBiO Technology. For FSTL1 expression experiment in vivo, a dose of 1.3 × 1011 GC of AAV-FSTL1 was injected into the gastrocnemius muscle of MKO mice and a same dose of AAV-GFP was injected into the gastrocnemius muscle of MKO and control mice on 12-week NASH diet. The mice were sacrificed after 4 weeks of virus injection.
Dual-luciferase reporter assays
The pGL3-FSTL1-promoter (−1525/ + 76) reporter plasmid was constructed by amplifying PCR products from C57BL/6J mouse genomic DNA and inserting it into the XhoI/HindIII site of the luciferase reporter vector pGL3-Vector (Promega) by using the following primers: GAACCTCGAGCTCTTAGCTTCAGGCTAT (F) and GAACAAGCTTAGGACACTGGGCAGGGT (R). The pGL3-FSTL1-promoter (−1122/ + 76) reporter plasmid was constructed by amplifying PCR products from The pGL3-FSTL1-promoter (−1525/ + 76) reporter plasmid and inserting it into the XhoI/HindIIIsite of the luciferase reporter vector pGL3-Vector (Promega) by using the following primers: GAACCTCGAGCCATGATACCTGGTATGATGAGAGC (F for −1122/ + 76) and GAACAAGCTTAGGACACTGGGCAGGGT (R for −1122/ + 76). The mutant reporter plasmids were constructed by amplifying the pGL3-FSTL1-promoter (−1525/ + 76) reporter plasmid by using the following primers: TGGTTAACTAGCACACCCCTCTTAAGTATAGAG (F for −1492/−1477 mutant reporter plasmid) and GGGTGTGCTAGTTAACCATGATTGTTGAGTTGACATAGCCTGA (R for −1492/−1477 mutant reporter plasmid); ACATACCAACATCTGTGTAGCACTCGGGCTAT (F for −1254/−1232 mutant reporter plasmid) and CACAGATGTTGGTATGTATGTAAACTCTGTTATGGGTCATATTGG (R for −1254/−1232 mutant reporter plasmid); TTGGTCTTCAGCTGTAGGTATTCAGCAGACCT (F for −1195/−1180 mutant reporter plasmid) and CTACAGCTGAAGACCAAAAAATTATGCCTAAATTCCACACTGA (R for −1195/−1180 mutant reporter plasmid). HEK293T cells were cultured in 24-well plates and co-transfected with pCDH-IRF4 plasmid, luciferase reporter plasmid, and pRL-TK (control reporter) by using ProFection Mammalian Transfection System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 48 h, cells were harvested and measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter assay system (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity (control reporter).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR assay
We performed the ChIP assay using the Sonication chip Kit (ABclonal, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, we fixed 2 × 106 C2C12 cells in 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at ambient temperature. The fixed cells were harvested, lysed, and sonicated for 66 cycles of 20 s ON/40 s OFF and 80% AMPL using Qsonica Q800R3 (Qsonica, USA). Antibodies against IRF4 (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and mouse IgG (ABclonal, China) were used for immunoprecipitation. PCR amplification of the precipitated DNA was performed. The primer sequences were used for the ChIP assay as followed: ① forward primer, TCAAAACTAACTAGCACACCC, reverse primer, TACACAAGCAGGTTTTCCAA. ② forward primer, TTTTGTTTCCATCTGTGTAGC, reverse primer, CTTAGTTTATCGTCTACCGAG. ③ forward primer, TGAAACCTTCAGCTGTAGGT, reverse primer, CTTCTCTTCACCTTCTTTGC.
Co-culture assay
To simulate the in vivo environment of NASH mice, HSC-T6 cells were induced fibrosis by 10 ng/ml TGF-β (MCE, China) factor56. AML12 cells and macrophage were induced lipid accumulation and inflammation by 200 nM palmitic acid (Sigma)57. The optimum concentration of rFSTL1 protein (MCE, China) was explored according to different cell lines. Packaging constructed shRNA of FSTL1 receptor into lentivirus. HSC-T6, AML12 and macrophage cells were first infected with lentivirus for 48 h, then induced with TGF-β or palmitic acid for 24 h, then co-cultured with gastrocnemius from Flox and MKO mice with/without rFSTL1 protein for 24 h. Finally, the cells were harvested for indicated experiments.
Total RNA extraction, library construction, and sequencing
Three liver tissue samples of each group for RNA sequencing were collected. Total RNA was isolated using the Trizol method according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quality was measured using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (RNA 6000 Nano Kit; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). cDNA libraries for each sample were constructed as reported previously. Libraries were sequenced on BGIseq500 platform (BGI-Shenzhen, China), using 150 bp paired-end reads aimed at 30 million reads per sample. The raw sequencing data was filtered with trim-galore (v0.6.7) by removing reads containing sequencing adapter and reads with low-quality base. The clean reads were mapped to the reference genome (mm10) using Hisat2 (2.2.1). Quantification of gene expression was calculated using FeatureCounts (v2.0.1), converted to transcripts per million (TPM) using the R software. We conducted a differential gene expression analysis comparing F4MKO versus control and overexpression of FSTL1 in F4MKO (F4MKO + FSTL1) versus F4MKO. Subsequently, differential expression analysis between groups was conducted using the DESeq2(1.3.40) with adjust P value < 0.05 and |FC| > 1.5. We used the obtained log2FC to perform a gene-set enrichment analysis to detect pathways enriched with profiling genes.
Human serum proteomics
A total of 180 human serum samples (43 control, 43 NAFL, 41 eNASH, and 53 fNASH subjects) were used to perform proteomics analysis as previously described58. Human serum samples used for protein extraction were first removed the top 14 highest abundance proteins using an immunodepleting kit (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The depleted serum was digested by trypsin at an enzyme to protein mass ratio of 1:25 overnight at 37 °C, and the peptides were then extracted and dried.
Samples were measured using LC-MS instrumentation consisting of an EASY- nLC 1200 ultra-high-pressure system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled via a nano-electrospray ion source (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to a Fusion Lumos Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The peptides were dissolved with 12 μl loading buffer (0.1% formic acid in water), and 5 μl was loaded onto a 100 μm I.D. × 2.5 cm, C18 trap column at a maximum pressure 280 bar with 14 μl solvent A (0.1% formic acid in water). Peptides were separated on 150 μm I.D. × 15 cm column (C18, 1.9 lm, 120 #A, Dr. Maisch GmbH) with a linear 15–30% Mobile Phase B (ACN and 0.1% formic acid) at 600 nl/min for 75 min. The MS analysis was performed in a data-independent manner (DIA). The DIA method consisted of MS1 scan from 300–1400 m/z at 60k resolution (AGC target 4e5 or 50 ms). Then, 30 DIA segments were acquired at 15k resolution with an AGC target 5e4 or 22 ms for maximal injection time. The setting “inject ions for all available parallelizable time” was enabled. HCD fragmentation was set to normalized collision energy of 30%. The spectra were recorded in profile mode. The default charge state for the MS2 was set to 3.
The DIA data were searched against UniProt human protein database (updated on 2019.12.17, 20,406 entries) using FragPipe (v12.1) with MSFragger (2.2). The mass tolerances were 20 ppm for precursor and 50 mmu for product ions. Up to two missed cleavages were allowed. The search engine set cysteine carbamidomethylation as a fixed modification and N-acetylation and oxidation of methionine as variable modifications. Precursor ion score charges were limited to +2, +3, and +4. The data were also searched against a decoy database so that protein identifications were accepted at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1%. The results of DIA data were combined into spectra libraries using SpectraST software. DIA data was analyzed using DIA-NN (v1.7.0). The default settings were used for DIA-NN (Precursor FDR: 5%, Log lev: 1, Mass accuracy: 20 ppm, MS1 accuracy: 10 ppm, Scan window: 30, Implicit protein group: genes, Quantification strategy: robust LC (high accuracy)). Quantification of identified peptides was calculated as the average of chromatographic fragment ion peak areas across all reference spectra libraries. Label-free protein quantifications were calculated using a label-free, intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ) approach. We calculated the peak area values as parts of corresponding proteins. The fraction of total (FOT) was used to represent the normalized abundance of a particular protein across samples. FOT was defined as a protein’s iBAQ divided by the total iBAQ of all identified proteins within a sample. The FOT values were multiplied by 105 for the ease of presentation and missing values were imputed with 10−5.
Mouse serum proteomics
Mouse blood samples were obtained from the orbital vein and collected into commercial anticoagulation tubes containing tri-potassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Immediately after collection, the samples were centrifuged at 3000 × g for 15 min at +4 °C to separate the serum. The supernatant was then frozen at −80 °C before LC-MS analysis.
To prepare the samples for LC-MS/MS analysis, the 14 most abundant serum proteins were removed from each sample using commercial depletion kits (High Select™ Depletion Spin Columns, Thermo Fisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s instructions. After the depletion process, the proteins were denatured, reduced, alkylated, digested into peptides, and desalted using the C-18 column. Then the samples were analyzed using LC-MS/MS equipment, which was conducted as previously described59. The MS spectra were acquired using a Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) method. The DIA-MS method involved a preliminary MS1 scan covering the mass range of 300 to 1400 m/z (with an AGC target of 4 × 105 and a maximum injection time of 50 ms) at a resolution of 60,000. Subsequently, 30 DIA segments were employed, each covering a specific mass range. These segments were scanned with an AGC target of 5 × 104 and a maximum injection time of 22 ms, at a resolution of 15,000. Peptide identification and protein quantification was performed according to the standard workflow in Skyline (https://skyline.ms/_webdav/home/software/Skyline/@files/tutorials). 6 raw files’ reports were produced by Skyline DIA analysis and were merged to create an integrated expression matrix. This matrix includes the expression levels of each individual protein, utilizing all identified distinct peptides for protein quantification. The peptide and protein detection Q value was set at 5%. Proteome qualification was conducted using the iBAQ algorithm60, and the resulting values were normalized to the fraction of the total (FOT). FOT is defined as the ratio of a protein’s iBAQ to the total iBAQ of all identified proteins within a given sample, representing the normalized abundance of a specific protein across all samples. Any missing values were replaced with the 1/5 of minimal value.
Quantification and statistical analysis
A two-tailed Student t test was performed for comparison of two groups. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-tests were performed for intergroup comparisons. All data except human clinical data were presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM).
Clinical data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for intergroup comparisons of continuous data, and the chi-squared test was used for comparisons of categorical variables. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was calculated for nonnormally distributed data.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available in the article and its Supplementary information. Source data are provided as Source data file. All data supporting the findings of this study are available in the Source data file. RNA-seq data has been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession codes: GSE216378. The proteomics data have been deposited in the PRIDE under accession number: PXD045324. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Brunt, E. M. et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 1, 15080 (2015).
Bedossa, P. Pathology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 37, 85–89 (2017).
Liu, Z. et al. Phenome-wide association analysis reveals novel links between genetically determined levels of liver enzymes and disease phenotypes. Phenomics 2, 295–311 (2022).
Machado, M. V. & Diehl, A. M. Pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 150, 1769–1777 (2016).
Xiong, X. & Li, X. Type 2 diabetes originated from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Life Metabolism 2, 10–12 (2023).
Caldwell, S. & Lazo, M. Is exercise an effective treatment for NASH? Knowns and unknowns. Ann. Hepatol. 8, S60–S66 (2009).
Pedersen, B. K. & Febbraio, M. A. Muscles, exercise and obesity: skeletal muscle as a secretory organ. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 8, 457–465 (2012).
Fang, C. et al. Caffeine-stimulated muscle IL-6 mediates alleviation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Biochim Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1864, 271–280 (2019).
Choi, K. et al. The association of the serum levels of myostatin, follistatin, and interleukin-6 with sarcopenia, and their impacts on survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 26, 492–505 (2020).
Nagase, H., Visse, R. & Murphy, G. Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc Res. 69, 562–573 (2006).
Yoshio, S. et al. Myostatin as a fibroblast-activating factor impacts on postoperative outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol. Res. 51, 803–812 (2021).
Nishikawa, H. et al. Elevated serum myostatin level is associated with worse survival in patients with liver cirrhosis. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 8, 915–925 (2017).
Shaffer, A. L., Emre, N. C., Romesser, P. B. & Staudt, L. M. IRF4: Immunity. Malignancy! Therapy? Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 2954–2961 (2009).
Nam, S. & Lim, J. S. Essential role of interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) in immune cell development. Arch. Pharm. Res. 39, 1548–1555 (2016).
Eguchi, J. et al. Transcriptional control of adipose lipid handling by IRF4. Cell Metab. 13, 249–259 (2011).
Fabrizi, M. et al. IL-21 is a major negative regulator of IRF4-dependent lipolysis affecting Tregs in adipose tissue and systemic insulin sensitivity. Diabetes 63, 2086–2096 (2014).
Kong, X. et al. IRF4 is a key thermogenic transcriptional partner of PGC-1α. Cell 158, 69–83 (2014).
Kong, X. et al. Brown adipose tissue controls skeletal muscle function via the secretion of myostatin. Cell Metab. 28, 631–643.e633 (2018).
Zhu, X. et al. IRF4 in skeletal muscle regulates exercise capacity via PTG/glycogen pathway. Adv. Sci. 7, 2001502 (2020).
Yao, T. et al. Obese skeletal muscle-expressed interferon regulatory factor 4 transcriptionally regulates mitochondrial branched-chain aminotransferase reprogramming metabolome. Diabetes 71, 2256–2271 (2022).
Kato, K. et al. Liver steatosis is associated with insulin resistance in skeletal muscle rather than in the liver in Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Diabetes Investig. 6, 158–163 (2015).
Ramnath, D. et al. Hepatic expression profiling identifies steatosis-independent and steatosis-driven advanced fibrosis genes. JCI Insight 3, e120274 (2018).
Rao, J. et al. FSTL1 promotes liver fibrosis by reprogramming macrophage function through modulating the intracellular function of PKM2. Gut 71, 2539–2550 (2022).
Fan, N. et al. Follistatin-like 1: a potential mediator of inflammation in obesity. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013, 752519 (2013).
Vollmann, E. H. et al. Identification of novel fibrosis modifiers by in vivo siRNA silencing. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 7, 314–323 (2017).
Xi, Y. et al. Dynamic resistance exercise increases skeletal muscle-derived FSTL1 inducing cardiac angiogenesis via DIP2A-Smad2/3 in rats following myocardial infarction. J. Sport Health Sci. 10, 594–603 (2021).
Miyabe, M. et al. Muscle-derived follistatin-like 1 functions to reduce neointimal formation after vascular injury. Cardiovasc. Res. 103, 111–120 (2014).
Zhang, F. et al. Hepatic CREBZF couples insulin to lipogenesis by inhibiting insig activity and contributes to hepatic steatosis in diet-induced insulin-resistant mice. Hepatology 68, 1361–1375 (2018).
Bortoluzzi, S., Scannapieco, P., Cestaro, A., Danieli, G. A. & Schiaffino, S. Computational reconstruction of the human skeletal muscle secretome. Proteins 62, 776–792 (2006).
Zheng, Y., Huang, C., Zhao, L., Chen, Y. & Liu, F. Regulation of decorin by ursolic acid protects against non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 143, 112166 (2021).
Roeb, E. Matrix metalloproteinases and liver fibrosis (translational aspects). Matrix Biol. 68-69, 463–473 (2018).
McQuitty, C. E., Williams, R., Chokshi, S. & Urbani, L. Immunomodulatory role of the extracellular matrix within the liver disease microenvironment. Front Immunol. 11, 574276 (2020).
Murakami, K. et al. Follistatin-related protein/follistatin-like 1 evokes an innate immune response via CD14 and toll-like receptor 4. FEBS Lett. 586, 319–324 (2012).
Zhang, Y. et al. Follistatin-like 1 (FSTL1) interacts with Wnt ligands and Frizzled receptors to enhance Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in obstructed kidneys in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 102010 (2022).
Mattiotti, A., Prakash, S., Barnett, P. & van den Hoff, M. J. B. Follistatin-like 1 in development and human diseases. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 75, 2339–2354 (2018).
Chaly, Y., Hostager, B., Smith, S. & Hirsch, R. The follistatin-like protein 1 pathway is important for maintaining healthy articular cartilage. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2, 407–414 (2020).
Aizarani, N. et al. A human liver cell atlas reveals heterogeneity and epithelial progenitors. Nature 572, 199–204 (2019).
Liang, Y. et al. Temporal analyses of postnatal liver development and maturation by single-cell transcriptomics. Dev. Cell 57, 398–414 e395 (2022).
Alvarez, M. et al. Human liver single nucleus and single cell RNA sequencing identify a hepatocellular carcinoma-associated cell-type affecting survival. Genome Med. 14, 50 (2022).
Xiong, X. et al. Landscape of intercellular crosstalk in healthy and NASH liver revealed by single-cell secretome gene analysis. Mol. Cell 75, 644–660 e645 (2019).
Suppli, M. P. et al. Hepatic transcriptome signatures in patients with varying degrees of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease compared with healthy normal-weight individuals. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 316, G462–G472 (2019).
Honda, K. & Taniguchi, T. IRFs: master regulators of signalling by Toll-like receptors and cytosolic pattern-recognition receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 644–658 (2006).
Eguchi, J. et al. Interferon regulatory factor 4 regulates obesity-induced inflammation through regulation of adipose tissue macrophage polarization. Diabetes 62, 3394–3403 (2013).
Hambrock, H. O. et al. Structural characterization of TSC-36/Flik: analysis of two charge isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 11727–11735 (2004).
Tanaka, K. et al. Follistatin like 1 regulates hypertrophy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 1, 207–221 (2016).
Liu, Y. et al. The correlation between FSTL1 expression and airway remodeling in asthmatics. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 7918472 (2017).
Zhang, K. et al. Deficiency of the mitochondrial NAD kinase causes stress-induced hepatic steatosis in mice. Gastroenterology 154, 224–237 (2018).
Gallage, S. et al. A researcher’s guide to preclinical mouse NASH models. Nat. Metab. 4, 1632–1649 (2022).
Ichimura, M. et al. A diet-induced Sprague-Dawley rat model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis. J. Nutr. Biochem 40, 62–69 (2017).
Guo, S. et al. Impacts of exercise interventions on different diseases and organ functions in mice. J. Sport Health Sci. 9, 53–73 (2020).
European Association for the Study of the L, European Association for the Study of D, European Association for the Study of O. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 64, 1388–1402 (2016).
Bedossa, P. & Consortium, F. P. Utility and appropriateness of the fatty liver inhibition of progression (FLIP) algorithm and steatosis, activity, and fibrosis (SAF) score in the evaluation of biopsies of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 60, 565–575 (2014).
Kleiner, D. E. et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 41, 1313–1321 (2005).
Bian, H. et al. Impact of type 2 diabetes on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Endocr. Pr. 26, 444–453 (2020).
Li, P. et al. Hematopoietic-derived galectin-3 causes cellular and systemic insulin resistance. Cell 167, 973–984 e912 (2016).
Lua, I. et al. Characterization of hepatic stellate cells, portal fibroblasts, and mesothelial cells in normal and fibrotic livers. J. Hepatol. 64, 1137–1146 (2016).
Zhang, X. et al. Macrophage p38alpha promotes nutritional steatohepatitis through M1 polarization. J. Hepatol. 71, 163–174 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. Deep dive on the proteome of human body fluids: a valuable data resource for biomarker discovery. Cancer Genom. Proteom. 18, 549–568 (2021).
Chen, Y. M. et al. Blood molecular markers associated with COVID-19 immunopathology and multi-organ damage. EMBO J. 39, e105896 (2020).
Schwanhäusser, B. et al. Corrigendum: Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 495, 126–127 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the platform of State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering at Fudan University. The authors gratefully acknowledge Analysis and Testing center of Experiment Center for Science and Technology, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University for performing Proteomics. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (92157203) to X.K., the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32371194) to H.G., the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0801900, 2018YFA0800300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971074, 32150610475) to T.L., Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20ZR1410200) and Clinical Research Project of Zhongshan Hospital (2020ZSLC19) to H.B., the Yangfan Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (grant number: 21YF1405000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82300978) to Y.F., the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82100849) and Young Foundation of Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University (2021ZSQN07) to X.Z., the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82200952) to Q.Z.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The experimental plan was designed by S.G., T.L. and X.K., S.G., Y.F., X.Zhu, H.G. and X.Zhang performed experiments and analyzed data. X.Zhang, Y.F. and H.W. collected the human samples and analyzed RNA-SEQ data. S.G., R.W. and Q.Z. carried out the animal experiments and analyzed the data. Y.R., Y.F., X.G., H.B. and X.Zhu collected human samples and analyzed the proteomics. X.K. wrote the manuscript incorporating edits and comments from T.L., X.G., Y.L., H.B. and all other authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Ling Zheng, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, S., Feng, Y., Zhu, X. et al. Metabolic crosstalk between skeletal muscle cells and liver through IRF4-FSTL1 in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat Commun 14, 6047 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41832-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41832-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.