Abstract
Electron-vibration coupling is of critical importance for the development of molecular electronics, spintronics, and quantum technologies, as it affects transport properties and spin dynamics. The control over charge-state transitions and subsequent molecular vibrations using scanning tunneling microscopy typically requires the use of a decoupling layer. Here we show the vibronic excitations of tetrabromotetraazapyrene (TBTAP) molecules directly adsorbed on Ag(111) into an orientational glassy phase. The electron-deficient TBTAP is singly-occupied by an electron donated from the substrate, resulting in a spin 1/2 state, which is confirmed by a Kondo resonance. The TBTAP•− discharge is controlled by tip-gating and leads to a series of peaks in scanning tunneling spectroscopy. These occurrences are explained by combining a double-barrier tunneling junction with a Franck-Condon model including molecular vibrational modes. This work demonstrates that suitable precursor design enables gate-dependent vibrational excitations of molecules on a metal, thereby providing a method to investigate electron-vibration coupling in molecular assemblies without a decoupling layer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Electron–vibration (e–ν) coupling is a central topic in a wide range of molecular electronics, spintronics and quantum computing. The e–ν coupling in a single-molecule junction strongly influences charge transport through the molecule1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. When an electron tunnels from the electrode onto a molecule, the molecule enters a charge state that can force the relaxation of the nuclear coordinates. This process, which gives rise to vibrational excitations of a molecule during an electronic transition, is commonly treated within the Franck–Condon (FC) picture11,12. In this model, an instantaneous electronic transition is assumed, in contrast to the slow motion of nuclei that is directly visible in the low-temperature transport spectroscopy of single molecules1,13,14,15,16. However, detecting the e–ν coupling is a difficult task because it requires to control down to the nanometer scale, where such electronic transitions only have femtosecond lifetimes17,18,19,20.
Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and spectroscopy (STS) are useful tools for this purpose, as they can visualize the topography of molecules on surfaces at the atomic scale and probe their electronic states. The strong e–ν coupling, whose fingerprint is a sequential electron transport during charge or discharge processes in single-molecules, has been measured using STS on various substrates4,5,21,22, but also in transport devices23,24,25,26. While the study of the charge-state control and vibrational excitations of molecules on decoupling layers was widely reported27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34, observing e–ν coupling in STS measurements is more challenging when molecules are directly adsorbed on metal surfaces35.
Despite the high lateral resolution of a STM, the short lifetime of charge states in molecular species in direct contact with a metal substrate typically results in a broadened peak in the differential conductance, making the detailed observation of vibrational excitations challenging4,35. This problem can be circumvented by decoupling molecules from the metal using an insulating layer to better resolve them with high intensity and resolution22,27,36,37,38. However, exploring vibrational excitations in molecular assemblies on decoupling layers is rather scarce in the literature since assembly protocols are less established than those on metals.
As a consequence, a facile protocol has been developed through the judicious design and chemical modification of a pyrene core. The insertion of four nitrogen atoms at 1-,3-,6- and 8-positions of the aromatic ring imparts a strong electron-deficiency to tetraazapyrene (TAP)39,40. The subsequent introduction of four bromine atoms at 4-,5-,9- and 10-positions of the TAP core is beneficial to multiple types of non-covalent intermolecular interactions, leading to the formation of N ⋯ Br and Br ⋯ Br halogen bonds and N ⋯ H and Br ⋯ H hydrogen bonds41,42,43. On the other hand, the bulky bromine atoms can efficiently decouple the TAP core from a metal surface.
Herein, we demonstrate that 4,5,9,10-tetrabromo-1,3,6,8-tetraazapyrene (TBTAP) molecules (Fig. 1a) adsorbed directly on an Ag(111) surface can exhibit pronounced vibronic features in dI/dV spectroscopic measurements. Self-assembly of TBTAP molecules on Ag(111) leads to an orientational glassy phase, as determined by high-resolution STM and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Due to their electron-accepting nature, TBTAP molecules are charged by a single electron donated from the substrate, which is confirmed by a Kondo resonance observed in tunneling spectroscopy. The discharge of TBTAP•− can be locally controlled by the electric field of the tip, leading to conductance resonances at positive voltages in dI/dV spectra and concentric rings in dI/dV maps. These peaks result from the discharge of the molecule followed by vibrational excitations in accordance with the FC model. Our work thus provides an alternative route to study e–ν coupling of molecules self-assembled on a metal substrate through an appropriate design of the precursors.
Results
Orientational glassy phase of TBTAP molecules on Ag(111)
TBTAP was prepared following the literature procedure39,40. Molecules were sublimated on the Ag(111) surface kept at a temperature of ~100–150 K (see the “Methods” section). Such cold deposition not only prevents the dehalogenation reaction of the molecule43 but also leads to their spontaneous assembly into extended molecular islands, as shown in the STM overview of Fig. 1b. In these domains, each TBTAP molecule has a H shape contrast in agreement with the molecule’s dimension and is adsorbed along the three main [10\(\overline{1}\)] directions of Ag(111). These adsorption orientations are denoted by white, black and blue circles, respectively. Using constant-height AFM imaging with CO-terminated tips (Fig. 1c)44, we also resolved the chemical structure of individual TBTAP molecule within the assembly. We conclude that the molecules lie flat on Ag(111) and are stabilized by non-covalent Br ⋯ Br and Br ⋯ N halogen bonds (white dashed lines in Fig. 1c) and by C–H ⋯ Br and C–H ⋯ N hydrogen bonds (Supplementary Fig. 1)41,42,43. The white dotted lines of Fig. 1b indicate that the molecular assembly forms a perfect hexagonal tiling in relative registry with the underlying substrate (plain lines). Along each dotted line, molecules are randomly rotated by ≈ ±60° with respect to each other (Supplementary Fig. 2). This is likely induced by the limited rotational dynamics of molecules in the assembly at the low temperature which restricts a rearrangement of the molecular lattice. As a result, the TBTAP lattice adopts an orientational glassy phase45,46.
We next acquired a series of STM images at the same area by varying the bias voltage from 0.6 to 1.5 V (Fig. 1d–f). While at Vs = 0.6 V all molecules show a very similar contrast by STM, some of them appear much brighter above Vs ≥ 1 V (Fig. 1e). A closer look at these bright molecules reveals a particular bonding environment that consists of six molecules with three distinct adsorption orientations. These surrounding molecules have the arrangement as depicted in the inset of Fig. 1f.
Electronic and magnetic properties of TBTAP molecules
We next investigate the electronic properties of TBTAP molecules using differential conductance measurements. Figure 2a shows exemplary dI/dV point-spectra acquired at TBTAP molecules (blue and black dots in the STM inset). A step-like feature at Vs ≈ +0.5 V (gray dashed line) is systematically observed which is attributed to an interfacial state (IS) similar to those observed for epitaxial PTCDA or NTCDA molecules on Ag(111)47,48,49. At higher voltages, a series of intense resonance peaks denoted Pn (n is an integer) appear starting from P1 = 0.6 V (0.9 V) for the blue (black) spectra. A slight shift of the P1 energy is often observed between neighboring molecules of the assembly, as exemplary shown in Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4. We also assign the resonance at Vs = −1.1 V to the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO, Supplementary Fig. 5). As will be discussed in the following, we attribute the sequence of Pn peaks to two concomitant mechanisms: first the charge-state transition from the radical anionic species TBTAP•− molecule to its neutral counterpart TBTAP0 induced by the electric field of the tip30,31,32 and second, the associated vibrational excitations of the molecule50.
Upon adsorption to Ag(111), the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the neutral TBTAP shifts below EF and becomes populated by a single electron leading to a singly occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) of spin 1/2 (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Due to Coulomb repulsion, the SOMO level is accompanied by the formation of a resonance above EF (i.e. singly unoccupied molecular orbitals—SUMO) separated by the Coulomb energy U as reported by Fernandez-Torrente et al. in the case of TCNQ− molecules on Au(111)51. To confirm the radical anionic character of the TBTAP molecule on Ag(111), we then focus using dI/dV spectroscopy on energies close to the Fermi level.
Figure 2b shows the zero-bias peak (ZBP) detected in dI/dV spectra at the center of the molecule, which is always accompanied by two pronounced side peaks at ±52 mV (gray dotted lines). The resonances at ±110 mV (black arrows) are assigned to the SOMO/SUMO states of the molecule. As compared to the ZBP, they are much broader, symmetric to EF and separated by U ≈ 220 mV. Note that a variation of their position in energy was estimated between 90 and 110 meV among molecules of the glassy phase (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Using dI/dV mapping, we also confirmed that the SUMO and SOMO orbitals are identical as a result of their splitting in the anionic TBTAP•− (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Figure 2c displays a dI/dV spectra acquired at the periphery of the molecule, where the ZBP becomes more pronounced as compared to the side peaks. In analogy to ref. 51, we assign the ZBP to the manifestation of a Kondo singlet from the TBTAP•− electron trapped in the SOMO level while side-peaks are related to inelastic vibrational excitations of the molecule. Two more pairs of resonances are observed at ±18 and ±36 mV with much lower intensity (dashed lines in Fig. 2c). We think that they might be also related to low-vibronic modes of the TBTAP molecule.
To confirm the Kondo nature of the ZBP, dI/dV spectra were acquired at varying sample temperatures T. Figure 2d shows a significant broadening of the ZBP with increasing T, which fully vanishes for T = 15.6 K. For each spectrum, we extracted the half width at half maximum (HWHM) and plotted it as a function of the temperature T (Fig. 2e). A typical Kondo-screened state is deduced with an estimated Kondo temperature of TK ≈ 8.8 ± 1.5 K using the Fermi liquid model52. Using density functional theory (DFT), we also calculated the spin density of the TBTAP•− in gas phase (Fig. 2f). Its distribution is mostly located at the periphery of the TAP core, in relative agreement with the localization of the ZBP over the TBTAP•− molecule obtained by zero-bias dI/dV mapping (Fig. 2g). From these spectroscopic data, we infer the ground-state of the radical TBTAP•− molecules on Ag(111) as a result of the occupancy by a single electron of its former LUMO orbital. This “charged” TBTAP configuration can be pictured as the analog of a singly-occupied quantum dot, whose charge-state is modified by the local field of the STM tip.
Experimental signature of electron–vibration coupling
We next investigate the influence of the tip-sample distance Z on the discharging/vibronic Pn peaks above the IS onset (gray dotted line) by recording a series of dI/dV point-spectra with increasing Z (Fig. 3a). The first peak P1 is assigned to the threshold voltage at which the discharge of the TBTAP•− molecule occurs by tip gating. Such tip-assisted discharge of a molecular radical at surfaces is usually described using a double barrier tunneling junction (DBTJ)30,31,32. Within this model, the lever arm α is a key parameter that reflects the efficiency with which the STM can locally gate the molecular level and provoke its discharge. Considering a plate-capacitor geometry, this voltage drop α between molecule and substrate linearly depends on the (X, Y, Z) tip positions with respect to the molecule as well as the voltage Vs applied to the substrate. As described in ref. 30, α can be estimated by the ratio ESOMO/(E−→0−ESOMO) with ESOMO is the SOMO energy and E−→0 = e ⋅ P1 is the discharging energy. In our experiments, P1 is found to vary from 0.35 up to 0.8 V within a molecular assembly using the same tip conditions and tip–sample separations (Fig. 1a, see also Supplementary Fig. 3) whereas the SOMO energy is ≈ − 90–110 meV between TBTAP•− molecules (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 5). Thus, we estimate the voltage drop in our system to be in the range of α = 0.12–0.35. This value is in a similar range compared to previous works of molecules on metal30.
Increasing the tip–sample distance Z between dI/dV spectra (Fig. 3a) systematically leads to the shift of the Pn peaks towards higher voltage values (dashed lines) since the fraction α decreases with the tip retraction. All peaks decrease in intensity as Z increases or even vanish (P4 and P5 for Z ≥ 50 pm) due to the small tunneling current in the STM junction at such tip–sample separation27. Figure 3b shows the Pn peak positions extracted from Fig. 3a as a function of Z offset, where each collection of data-points is fitted with linear functions. Their slopes a slightly increase with n such as \({a}_{{{{{{{{\rm{{P}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\rm{1}}}}}}}}}}}}\) = 1.425 mV pm−1, \({a}_{{{{{{{{\rm{{P}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\rm{2}}}}}}}}}}}}\) = 1.438 mV pm−1 and \({a}_{{{{{{{{\rm{{P}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\rm{3}}}}}}}}}}}}\) = 1.544 mV pm−1, which is in analogy to ref. 27. The fit lines are also shifted in voltage by ΔV ≈ 120–150 mV extracted from several experimental data-sets. More precisely, the spacing between P1 and P2 is always about 10% larger than between P2 and P3 and 10% shorter than the P3/P4 spacing. If the molecular degrees of freedom are considered within the harmonic approximation, the energy difference between vibrationally excited states of a single mode should be equal leading to equally-spaced resonance peaks. However, this may not be a realistic representation of the STM setup where anharmonic effects may result in peaks that are not evenly spaced. Additionally, the tunneling of current through the STM device induces a charge redistribution that results in an atomic rearrangement53, thereby altering the vibrational spectrum.
Assuming that the vibrational excitation peaks correspond to a single vibronic mode of the molecule, we estimate the vibration energy \({{\Omega }}_{\exp }\) taking into account the voltage drop α such as \({{\Omega }}_{\exp }\) = αΔV. With the large variation of α = 0.15–0.35 between neighboring molecules, the absolute value of \({{\Omega }}_{\exp }\) ranges from 14 up to 53 meV, which is in the range of the values obtained by tunneling through the Kondo resonance (Fig. 2c). Since α remains constant at one molecule site, the error on the estimate of single mode energy \({{\Omega }}_{\exp }\) is about ± 10% (i.e. maximum 5 meV) as it scales with ΔV.
We last compare this experimental value to the infrared spectrum (FT-IR) of TBTAP in solution (Supplementary Fig. 6). Although the FT-IR spectrum of polycyclic aromatic molecules is sensitive to their charge states whereby these modes are activated by ionization, the frequency shifts are limited to about 100 cm−1 (i.e. 12 meV) relative to the neutral state54. As compared to Supplementary Fig. 6, the energy range of \({{\Omega }}_{\exp }\) corresponds to the vibrational mode of the peripheral C–Br bonds (peak 4 at 79 ± 12 meV) as well as vibrational-rotational of the pyrene structure (peak 1 at 50 ± 12 meV). Note also that these values corresponding to the single molecule in gas phase are likely overestimated as compared to the case of TBTAP coupled to the Ag(111) surface.
Figure 3c shows a dI/dV(V, X) cross-section acquired along four neighboring molecules (white arrow of the STM inset). The hyperbola of high conductance marked by black dotted contour lines correspond to the discharge event P1 detected above the molecules as a function of the lateral tip position X. The contour lines thus pinpoint the charge-state transition from radical anions TBTAP•− molecules to neutral TBTAP0 as a function of the tip position X and the applied voltage Vs29,30,31,32. Each hyperbola is centered to the molecular sites indicating the localization of the charge before its removal by gating. For voltages Vs greater than values of the contour lines (area n = 1), one electron is successfully removed from one molecule. For increasing Vs above a molecule (white dashed line in Fig. 3c), two more hyperbola of high intensities (denoted P2 and P3) emerge which are followed by a fainter oscillation, which maxima are marked P4 and P5. These features correspond to the sequence of discharging/vibrational excitation peaks exemplary shown in Fig. 3a. These resonances are systematically observed above each molecule but can be slightly shifted in energy as a result of a modulation of the surface potential within the molecular assembly.
As expected for the DBTJ model27,28,29,30,31,32, increasing Vs leads to the expansion of the branches of each discharge hyperbola up to their crossing. Such crossing point, whose position in X is marked by a white dotted line in Fig. 3c, corresponds to the equidistance of the tip from the neighboring molecules 1 and 2. At voltage values corresponding to the area n = 2, the removal of two electrons by gating (one from each molecule) becomes possible, which indicates that two neighboring molecules can be subsequently excited at this tip position. To illustrate this, Fig. 3d compares dI/dV spectra of Fig. 3c extracted along the white dashed lines (molecule 1) and white dotted lines (between molecules 1 and 2), respectively. Both curves show the typical series of discharging/vibronic oscillations Pn at voltages between 0.6 and 1.0 V corresponds to region n = 1. At higher voltage (Vs ≥ 1.2 V), no more resonances are observed when placing the tip on the molecule whereas a second series of oscillations emerges when probing between the two molecules (n = 2 in blue spectra). The resurgence of the oscillations at the region n = 2 of Fig. 3c (see also Supplementary Fig. 3) suggests the vibrational excitations of both neighboring molecules at such tip position. This can be explained by a slight difference of the SOMO levels between these neighboring molecules or a local variation of their electrostatic environment.
Charging/discharging events triggered by tip gating in the case of 0D-quantum dot systems appear in dI/dV mapping at a given Vs as rings of high differential conductance also called “Coulomb” rings29,30,31,32. To explore the contribution of the vibronic modes to the Coulomb pattern, we acquired a series of constant-height dI/dV maps at constant voltage Vs = 0.5 V while approaching the tip by 50 pm between maps (Fig. 3e–g). The dI/dV maps show three concentric rings centered to anionic TBTAP•− molecules indicative of their succesfull discharge and the subsequent vibrational excitations (molecules are turned into the neutral TBTAP0 state inside the ring)29. The Coulomb ring with the largest diameter always corresponds to P1 while the internal ones are associated to the vibronic modes P2,3,..in agreement with the dI/dV(X, V) cross-section of Fig. 3c. Note that as Z decreases for a constant-voltage, the electric field of the tip is more efficient to discharge molecules resulting in the appearance of more rings over the assembly.
The dI/dV map at Vs = 1.0 V (Fig. 3h) shows even more ring features centered to TBTAP molecules as compared to Fig. 3e–g. However, their observation is more tedious since the contrast is hampered by the strong contribution of the IS state above Vs = 0.5 V to the dI/dV maps. We also emphasize that the variable emergence of the Coulomb rings is the result of the complex electrostatic potential experienced by each molecule in the orientational glassy phase due to the neighboring ones. Adjacent rings arising from neighboring molecules intersect at high voltage (white arrow in Fig. 3g) but do not fuse implying the absence of electron correlations between molecules during the discharging process55.
Discussion
We interpret the peaks in Fig. 3a as the tip-induced discharging of the TBTAP•− radical in the form of a double barrier tunneling junction model in combination with a FC model. At low bias voltages, a single electron is trapped on each TBTAP molecule (Fig. 4a). When the threshold voltage \({V}_{{{{{{{{\rm{Thres}}}}}}}}}\) is reached, the electrons can tunnel from the molecule towards the substrate (Fig. 4b), leaving the molecule in a neutral state above \({V}_{{{{{{{{\rm{Thres}}}}}}}}}\). As a result of the discharging process, the current exhibits the characteristic step-like increase for the FC model, causing sharp peaks in the conductance. The molecular vibrations are strongly coupled to the charge transport, resulting in the onset of a FC blockade. Note also that the detection of such discharging/vibronic events of the TBTAP•− is not restricted to tunneling measurements since preliminary force spectroscopic data (Supplementary Fig. 7) have also detected features similar to those obtained by AFM using single redox molecules56. Future AFM-based investigations will address this in more details.
To support the interpretation of the experimental results as a strong coupling between electronic and vibrational degrees of freedom, we theoretically investigate the charge transport in a system that corresponds to an approximation of the experimental setup. As discussed above, we model the STM setup using a DBTJ with a single vibrational mode and a single electronic state corresponding to the SOMO. We investigate this model by employing a Born–Markov master equation approach3,57,58, which treats the setup within second-order in the environment–molecule coupling. The parameters defining the model are determined by fitting the conductance computed by the transport method to the experimentally measured curves depicted in Fig. 3a for Z = 0. For additional information regarding the utilized model system and transport formalism, we refer to Supplementary Note 1.
Relevant parameters for the interpretation include, for example, the coupling of the molecule to the tip and substrate, which have been determined to ΓT = 100 neV and ΓS = 580 neV, respectively. It is noted that within the Born–Markov master equation used, these coupling parameters determine the overall strength of the current but not the width of the resonance peaks. The lever arm associated with the asymmetric coupling is α ≈ 0.15, which lies within the range of the experimental values. Our numerical fitting procedure estimates the vibrational frequency to ΩTheory = 20 meV, and a dimensionless electronic-vibrational coupling strength to λ/Ω = 2.4, corresponding to a Huang–Rhys factor59 of R ≈ 3.4. Figure 4c depicts the fitted conductance–voltage characteristics employing the previously described parameters. The convincing agreement between the model and the experiments justifies the use of a single-state single-mode model system.
The weak coupling between molecules and the environment is crucial for the strong signature of electronic–vibrational coupling to emerge. Four Br atoms in each molecule could be the key aspect to lift the molecular backbone from the substrate. In order to examine this argument, debromination of TBTAP were performed by annealing the sample to ≈400 K. Supplementary Fig. 8 shows the honeycomb metal-organic frameworks formed by (MOFs)–TBTAP–Ag2. As reported recently43, organometallic C–Ag–C bonds are the main building blocks for the metal-organic frameworks. Within this framework, there are no longer any electron–vibration features in the dI/dV-spectra. The dehalogenation process strongly enhances the coupling between molecules and substrates, and forms a relatively strong C–Ag–C bond between molecules and substrates.
To further investigate the radical state of TBTAP molecules on Ag(111), we employed the STM tip to relocate the molecules from the island to the exposed surface. Supplementary Fig. 9a and b depict our successful transfer of a TBTAP molecule from the molecular island to the clean surface. However, obtaining spectra from the isolated molecule poses significant challenges due to its high mobility induced by the STM tip on the free surface. Despite this, we managed to construct dimers successfully, which revealed the presence of Coulomb rings in both molecules (supplementary Fig. 9c and d). This observation provides compelling evidence that TBTAP molecules exhibit radical-charged characteristics upon absorption on the Ag(111) surface.
In summary, we employed high-resolution STM and AFM images to observe a pattern of gate-dependent vibrational excitations in the orientational glassy phase of self-assembled TBTAP molecules on Ag(111). The TBTAP molecules are in a negatively charged radical state due to the electron donation of the substrate, as evidenced by the observation of a Kondo resonance in STS. dI/dV spectra further demonstrate the capability of discharging the molecule by tip gating and a strong electron–vibration coupling in molecules. Further dehalogenation experiments have proven that the weak interactions between molecules and substrates are due to the presence of the four Br atoms. Model calculations confirm the interpretation of the experimental data. Our results provide a feasible way to study electron–vibration couplings in molecules on the metal surface through a chemical design of molecular structures.
Methods
Sample preparation
The Ag(111) surface (MaTeck GmbH, 99.999%) was cleaned by cycles of Ar ion sputtering and annealing. TBTAP molecules were sublimated at ≈440 K with the substrate kept at ≈100–150 K.
STM/STS experiments
STM and dI/dV experiments were performed with a low-temperature (1 K) Joule–Thomson STM/AFM microscope (purchased from Omicron GmbH) in ultra high vacuum (UHV) of ≈ 10−10 mbar operated with a Nanonis RC5e electronics. Differential conductance, dI/dV, spectra were recorded with a lock-in amplifier using modulation amplitudes indicated in the caption. The dI/dV(X,V) of Fig. 3d consists of 40dI/dV spectra of 512 pixels each separated by ≈90 pm along the X direction (i.e. 3.2 nm × 2.2 V for 40 × 512 pixels2). Raw dI/dV spectra are shown in a waterfall plot (Supplementary Fig. 3).
AFM experiments
AFM experiments were performed in another low-temperature microscope (4.5 K) equipped with a qPlus sensor (f0 = 23.7 kHz, k = 1800 N m−1).56 In order to enhance the AFM resolution, the tip was functionalized with a CO molecule. CO functionalizing was done by depositing CO molecules on the cold surface (≤15 K) and then gently indenting the tip on top of a single CO molecule.
DFT calculations
Gas-phase DFT calculations were performed with the Gaussian 16 package60, using the B3LYP exchange-correlation functional61 and a 6-31G⋆⋆ basis set. To simulate the molecular anion, an extra electron was added and a doublet multiplicity initialized.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
References
Koch, J., Von Oppen, F. & Andreev, A. Theory of the Franck–Condon blockade regime. Phys. Rev. B 74, 205438 (2006).
Galperin, M., Ratner, M. A. & Nitzan, A. Molecular transport junctions: vibrational effects. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 103201 (2007).
Härtle, R. & Thoss, M. Resonant electron transport in single-molecule junctions: vibrational excitation, rectification, negative differential resistance, and local cooling. Phys. Rev. B 83, 115414 (2011).
Franke, K. J. & Pascual, J. I. Effects of electron–vibration coupling in transport through single molecules. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 394002 (2012).
Sukegawa, J. et al. Electron transfer through rigid organic molecular wires enhanced by electronic and electron–vibration coupling. Nat. Chem. 6, 899–905 (2014).
Gali, A. et al. Electron–vibration coupling induced renormalization in the photoemission spectrum of diamondoids. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–9 (2016).
Bocquet, M.-L., Lesnard, H. & Lorente, N. Inelastic spectroscopy identification of stm-induced benzene dehydrogenation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 096101 (2006).
Viljas, J. K., Cuevas, J. C., Pauly, F. & Häfner, M. Electron–vibration interaction in transport through atomic gold wires. Phys. Rev. B 72, 245415 (2005).
Graus, M. et al. Electron–vibration coupling in molecular materials: assignment of vibronic modes from photoelectron momentum mapping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 147601 (2016).
Secker, D. et al. Resonant vibrations, peak broadening, and noise in single molecule contacts: the nature of the first conductance peak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 136807 (2011).
Condon, E. A theory of intensity distribution in band systems. Phys. Rev. 28, 1182–1201 (1926).
Franck, J. & Dymond, E. G. Elementary processes of photochemical reactions. Trans. Faraday Soc. 21, 536–542 (1926).
Koch, J. & Von Oppen, F. Franck–Condon blockade and giant Fano factors in transport through single molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 206804 (2005).
Leturcq, R. et al. Franck–Condon blockade in suspended carbon nanotube quantum dots. Nat. Phys. 5, 327–331 (2009).
Burzurí, E. et al. Franck–Condon blockade in a single-molecule transistor. Nano Lett. 14, 3191–3196 (2014).
Galperin, M., Ratner, M. A. & Nitzan, A. Hysteresis, switching, and negative differential resistance in molecular junctions: a polaron model. Nano Lett. 5, 125–130 (2005).
Benyamini, A., Hamo, A., Kusminskiy, S. V., von Oppen, F. & Ilani, S. Real-space tailoring of the electron–phonon coupling in ultraclean nanotube mechanical resonators. Nat. Phys. 10, 151–156 (2014).
Bartels, L., Wang, F., Moller, D., Knoesel, E. & Heinz, T. F. Real-space observation of molecular motion induced by femtosecond laser pulses. Science 305, 648–651 (2004).
Bylinkin, A. et al. Real-space observation of vibrational strong coupling between propagating phonon polaritons and organic molecules. Nat. Photonics 15, 197–202 (2021).
Kong, F.-F. et al. Probing intramolecular vibronic coupling through vibronic-state imaging. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–8 (2021).
Schulze, G. et al. Resonant electron heating and molecular phonon cooling in single C60 junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136801 (2008).
Krane, N. et al. High-resolution vibronic spectra of molecules on molybdenum disulfide allow for rotamer identification. ACS Nano 12, 11698–11703 (2018).
Chae, D.-H. et al. Vibrational excitations in single trimetal-molecule transistors. Nano Lett. 6, 165–168 (2006).
Moth-Poulsen, K. & Bjørnholm, T. Molecular electronics with single molecules in solid-state devices. Nat. Nanotech. 4, 551–556 (2009).
Burzurí, E. et al. Sequential electron transport and vibrational excitations in an organic molecule coupled to few-layer graphene electrodes. ACS Nano 10, 2521–2527 (2016).
Evers, F., Korytár, R., Tewari, S. & van Ruitenbeek, J. M. Advances and challenges in single-molecule electron transport. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 035001 (2020).
Wu, S., Nazin, G., Chen, X., Qiu, X. & Ho, W. Control of relative tunneling rates in single molecule bipolar electron transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 236802 (2004).
Wu, S., Ogawa, N. & Ho, W. Atomic-scale coupling of photons to single-molecule junctions. Science 312, 1362–1365 (2006).
Teichmann, K. et al. Controlled charge switching on a single donor with a scanning tunneling microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 076103 (2008).
Fernández-Torrente, I., Kreikemeyer-Lorenzo, D., Stróżecka, A., Franke, K. J. & Pascual, J. I. Gating the charge state of single molecules by local electric fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 036801 (2012).
Kocić, N. et al. Periodic charging of individual molecules coupled to the motion of an atomic force microscopy tip. Nano Lett. 15, 4406–4411 (2015).
Kocić, N., Decurtins, S., Liu, S.-X. & Repp, J. Forces from periodic charging of adsorbed molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 146, 092327 (2017).
Kumar, D., Krull, C., Yin, Y., Medhekar, N. V. & Schiffrin, A. Electric field control of molecular charge state in a single-component 2D organic nanoarray. ACS Nano 13, 11882–11890 (2019).
Hauptmann, N., Hamann, C., Tang, H. & Berndt, R. Switching and charging of a ruthenium dye on Ag(111). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 10326–10330 (2013).
Frederiksen, T. et al. Dynamic Jahn–Teller effect in electronic transport through single C60 molecules. Phys. Rev. B 78, 233401 (2008).
Qiu, X., Nazin, G. V. & Ho, W. Vibronic states in single molecule electron transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 206102 (2004).
Repp, J., Liljeroth, P. & Meyer, G. Coherent electron-nuclear coupling in oligothiophene molecular wires. Nat. Phys. 6, 975–979 (2010).
Schulz, F. et al. Many-body transitions in a single molecule visualized by scanning tunnelling microscopy. Nat. Phys. 11, 229–234 (2015).
Geib, S. et al. 1, 3, 6, 8-tetraazapyrenes: synthesis, solid-state structures, and properties as redox-active materials. J. Org. Chem. Res. 77, 6107–6116 (2012).
Zhou, P. et al. Effect of tert-butyl groups on electronic communication between redox units in tetrathiafulvalene-tetraazapyrene triads. Chem. Commun. 57, 12972–12975 (2021).
Tschakert, J. et al. Surface-controlled reversal of the selectivity of halogen bonds. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–8 (2020).
Han, Z. et al. Imaging the halogen bond in self-assembled halogenbenzenes on silver. Science 358, 206–210 (2017).
Li, H. et al. Sub-angstrom imaging of nondegenerate Kekulé structures in a two-dimensional halogen-bonded supramolecular network. J. Phys. Chem. C 126, 4241–4247 (2022).
Gross, L., Mohn, F., Moll, N., Liljeroth, P. & Meyer, G. The chemical structure of a molecule resolved by atomic force microscopy. Science 325, 1110–1114 (2009).
Jiang, S. et al. Orientationally glassy crystals of Janus spheres. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 218301 (2014).
Moret, R. Structures, phase transitions and orientational properties of the C60 monomer and polymers. Acta Crystallogr. A 61, 62–76 (2005).
Temirov, R., Soubatch, S., Luican, A. & Tautz, F. S. Free-electron-like dispersion in an organic monolayer film on a metal substrate. Nature 444, 350–353 (2006).
Marks, M. et al. Energy shift and wave function overlap of metal-organic interface states. Phys. Rev. B 84, 081301(R) (2011).
Eschmann, L. et al. Coverage-dependent anisotropy of the NTCDA/Ag(111) interface state dispersion. Phys. Rev. B 100, 125155 (2019).
Reecht, G. et al. Vibrational excitation mechanism in tunneling spectroscopy beyond the Franck–Condon model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 116804 (2020).
Fernández-Torrente, I., Franke, K. & Pascual, J. Vibrational kondo effect in pure organic charge-transfer assemblies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 217203 (2008).
Mishra, S. et al. Topological frustration induces unconventional magnetism in a nanographene. Nat. Nanotech. 15, 22–28 (2020).
Bai, M. et al. Current-induced phonon renormalization in molecular junctions. Phys. Rev. B 94, 035411 (2016).
Calvo, F., Basire, M. & Parneix, P. Temperature effects on the rovibrational spectra of pyrene-based pahs. J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 8845–8854 (2011).
Li, H. et al. Imaging local discharge cascades for correlated electrons in WS2/WSe2 moiré superlattices. Nat. Phys. 17, 1114–1119 (2021).
Roy-Gobeil, A., Miyahara, Y., Bevan, K. & Grutter, P. Fully quantized electron transfer observed in a single redox molecule at a metal interface. Nano Lett. 19, 6104–6108 (2019).
Galperin, M., Nitzan, A. & Ratner, M. A. Resonant inelastic tunneling in molecular junctions. Phys. Rev. B 73, 045314 (2006).
Čížek, M., Thoss, M. & Domcke, W. Theory of vibrationally inelastic electron transport through molecular bridges. Phys. Rev. B 70, 125406 (2004).
Huang, K., Rhys, A. & Mott, N. F. Theory of light absorption and non-radiative transitions in F-centres. Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. 204, 406–423 (1950).
Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16 Revision C.01 (Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2016).
Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652 (1993).
Acknowledgements
We thank the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF-grant 200021_204053, 200020_188445), the SNSF through the NCCR MUST “Molecular Ultrafast Science and Technology” and the Swiss Nanoscience Institute (SNI). E.M. and R.P. acknowledge funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (ULTRADISS grant agreement No 834402) and supports as a part of NCCR SPIN, a National Centre of Competence (or Excellence) in Research, funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 51NF40-180604). C.L. acknowledges the Georg H. Endress Foundation for financial support. C.K. and M.T. are supported by a research grant of the German Research Foundation (DFG). C.K. and M.T. gratefully acknowledge support from the state of Baden-Württemberg through bwHPC and the DFG through Grants No. INST 40/575-1 FUGG (JUSTUS 2 cluster). U.A. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation Professorship grant PP00P2_187185. Computational resources were provided by the University of Bern (on the HPC cluster UBELIX, http://www.id.unibe.ch/hpc).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.M., R.P. and C.L. designed the experiments. P.Z., R.H., S.-X.L. and S.D. synthesized the molecule. C.L., J.C.L., O.C., T.G. and R.P. performed STM/AFM experiments and analyzed the data. C.K. and M.T. performed the theoretical simulation. U.A. performed the DFT calculations. C.L., C.K., S.-X.L., R.P. and E.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, C., Kaspar, C., Zhou, P. et al. Strong signature of electron-vibration coupling in molecules on Ag(111) triggered by tip-gated discharging. Nat Commun 14, 5956 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41601-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41601-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.