Introduction

Late blight, caused by the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, is the most economically important potato disease worldwide. It triggered the Irish Famine in the mid-19th century and still causes economic losses in excess of $6 billion annually1,2. Taking China as an example, according to the official statistics from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, the occurrence of potato late blight affects up to 50.91% of the total cultivated area, and the annual yield loss accounts for between 12.56 and 583.10 kilotons. A large outbreak of late blight occurred in 2012, and the total infected area peaked at 2.65 million ha. Potato production relies almost exclusively on chemical measures to control late blight. However, the frequent application of synthetic pesticides has raised environmental, health and safety concerns3,4. Therefore, alternative green technologies should be developed for reduced toxicity, more target specificity and environmental sustainability. RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved regulatory mechanism mediated by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), which can silence or inhibit the expression of target genes5,6,7,8. Crops can be directly sprayed with dsRNA (spray-induced gene silencing, SIGS) targeting key genes of plant pathogens to induce specific silencing, thus providing an opportunity to realize sustainable eco-friendly disease management9,10,11,12.

Although fungi such as Botrytis cinerea can efficiently absorb dsRNA from the environment13, P. infestans does not readily take up environmental dsRNA14,15, possibly due to characteristics of its cell wall16,17. In oomycetes, low uptake efficiency of exogenous RNA is the key obstacle in identifying gene function and RNA fungicide application13,18,19. Thus, a SIGS strategy requires a reliable vehicle to break the dsRNA delivery bottleneck for P. infestans. Nanoparticles with good biocompatibility can promote the translocation of exogenous substances, and have been widely adopted in cancer therapy20,21,22,23. Our previous study demonstrated that nanocarriers can accelerate endocytosis to promote the translocation of dsRNA across cell membranes for efficient cellular uptake24,25,26.

We previously constructed a facile-synthesized star polycation (SPc) as a low cost dsRNA nanocarrier, with high intracellular delivery efficiency, good biocompatibility and biodegradability27,28. The SPc nanocarrier consists of a hydrophobic core and a hydrophilic shell with positively-charged tertiary amine in the side chain. The hydrophobic core can be applied to assemble hydrophobic active ingredients, and the tertiary amine can combine with negatively-charged nucleic acids through electrostatic adsorption29.

In this study, we find that the SPc overcomes the dsRNA delivery bottleneck for P. infestans, thus efficiently inhibiting infection and extending the RNAi protective window. The SPc nanocarrier enhances the stability of dsRNA, protecting it from degradation, and facilitates its efficient intracellular delivery. Moreover, we co-express dsRNAs of two target genes in a bacterial system to markedly increase production at low cost to meet the demands necessary for field application. In addition, the nano-enabled elicitor amplifies the systemic defense responses of plants. After a simple incubation process, SPc can self-assemble with dsRNA and elicitors into bioprotectant nanoparticles through hydrophobic and electrostatic forces. The multicomponent nano-bioprotectant provides a significant protective effect in both laboratory and field conditions, enabling sustainable green management of potato late blight.

Results and discussion

Protective effect of SPc on dsRNA and its enhanced delivery

In this study, we demonstrated that SPc could protect dsRNA from enzymolysis whereas naked dsRNA was degraded quickly by RNase A at low salt concentration30, thus increasing the environmental stability of dsRNA (Supplementary Fig. 1). To determine uptake by P. infestans, naked dseGFP (dsRNA targeting the enhanced green fluorescent protein gene) was labeled with fluorescein to yield green fluorescence. After assembly with SPc, the fluorescence intensity of dseGFP was essentially unchanged (Supplementary Fig. 2). Confocal microscopy observations showed that naked dseGFP was poorly absorbed by P. infestans sporangia and hyphae. In comparison, SPc facilitated the uptake of dseGFP, overcoming the dsRNA delivery bottleneck (Fig. 1a). When applied to plant surfaces, the fluorescence intensity of SPc-loaded dseGFP was increased by 3.65-fold compared to naked dseGFP in potato leaves, which was consistently observed in both roots and leaves of the model solanaceous host plant Nicotiana benthamiana (Fig. 1b–d). Similarly, sporangia of a transgenic P. infestans strain expressing tdTomato (tandem dimer Tomato) fluorescent protein were treated with dstdTomato/SPc complex and dstdTomato alone. The red fluorescence was markedly reduced in the dstdTomato/SPc complex treatment, and the tdTomato gene expression level was decreased by 2.7-fold compared to dstdTomato alone (Fig. 1e, f). These results supported that the dsRNA could be effectively delivered into both oomycetes and plants with the help of SPc, leading to higher RNAi efficiency. Since SPc can protect dsRNA from enzymatic degradation and promote dsRNA delivery, the elevated uptake might be due to the combination of these two aspects.

Fig. 1: Enhanced delivery efficiency and protective effect of SPc-loaded dsRNA on leaves.
figure 1

a SPc promoted the uptake of fluorescently-labelled dseGFP by P. infestans sporangia. Five μL of dseGFP (500 ng/μL) and dseGFP/SPc complex were respectively added to both P. infestans sporangia and hyphae (12 d) (105 sporangia /mL), and fluorescence intensity was measured at 12 h after the incubation. (n = 3 biological replicates). b, c SPc promoted the uptake of fluorescent dseGFP by potato leaves after washing (fluorescein was used as the control). c The fluorescence intensity was measured at 12 h after the application (n = 3 leaves containing 12 inoculation points). The asterisk indicates significant difference according to independent two-tailed t-test (***p < 0.001). Bars represent the mean ± SE. d SPc promoted the uptake of fluorescently labelled dseGFP by N. benthamiana roots and leaves. The plot of the profile (right) indicates that the majority of the green fluorescence (white line) was found in the dseGFP/SPc complex-treated samples. (n = 3 biological replicates). e, f SPc increased the RNAi efficiency of the tdTomato gene in a P. infestans transformant expressing tdTomato fluorescent protein. Enlarged images of representative sporangia are shown. Five μL of dstdTomato (500 ng/μL) and dstdTomato/SPc complex were used, separately, to treat 5 μL of tdT-88069 sporangia suspension (105 sporangia/mL). Both fluorescence intensity and gene expression were examined at 12 h after the treatment. The plot of the profile (right) indicates the majority of the red fluorescence (white line). Bars represent the mean ± SE. Gene expression (f) represents the comparison with the non-silenced control. (n = 3 biological replicates). The asterisk indicates significant difference according to independent two-tailed t-test (***p < 0.001). Bars represent the mean ± SE. g, h Enhanced protective effect of SPc-loaded dsRNA on potato leaves. g The detached potato leaves were sprayed with various formulations (dsRNA concentration: 500 ng/μL), and sporangia suspension was inoculated onto plant leaves after 24 h. Pictures were acquired at 2, 5 and 15 dpi, and then (h) lesion area was measured (n = 3 biological replicates). Different letters above each bar indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 as determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison post hoc test. Bars represent the mean ± SE. A five-pointed star means that the corresponding value is zero. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Nano-enabled dsRNA exhibits a significant protective effect

Oomycetes such as P. infestans employ a complex assortment of cell wall-degrading enzymes to breach plant cells, with the cuticle being the first barrier. Once infection has been successfully established, hyphae subsequently grow through the plant tissue to extend haustoria into cells, thus potentially facilitating uptake of nutrients from plant cells16. During the initial stages of the infection process, cutinase (PiCut3) degrades cutin as the outermost pathogen-plant barrier31. The haustorial membrane protein 1 (PiHmp1) is a jacalin lectin-like protein that localizes to the haustorium membrane and is essential for infection32. We synthesized dsRNAs for PiHmp1 (216 bp) and PiCut3 (251 bp) in vitro, and then sprayed dsPiHmp1, dsPiCut3 and their SPc-loaded complexes onto detached potato leaves. P. infestans sporangia suspension was inoculated onto plant leaves 24 h later, and the lesion area was measured at 2, 5, and 15 days post infection (dpi). As shown in Fig. 1g, h, application of SPc-loaded dsPiHmp1 or dsPiCut3 strongly protected the leaves against infection after 24 h, whereas naked dsRNA had no protective effect due to limited uptake and instability of dsRNA, which was consistent with the report of Qiao et al.15. Other studies using naked dsRNAs showed decreased infection by P. infestans, but not complete protection against disease14. Importantly, there were still no disease symptoms in the leaves after 15 days of initial inoculation, prolonging the RNAi protective window. Our study found that the SPc/dsRNA complex remained on plants for up to 12 days and was 1.5-fold more abundant than dsRNA alone (Supplementary Fig. 3). We synthesized dsRNA from the two genes together in tandem (dsPiHmp1+PiCut3; 24 ng/μL) without SPc loaded in vitro, and showed that this had a significant silencing effect on both PiHmp1 and PiCut3 (Supplementary Fig. 4). These results demonstrated that dsRNAs homologous to two selected target genes could be combined and applied to inhibit P. infestans infection, but only via the SPc-based delivery system.

Scaling up production of dsRNA is a limiting factor for field applications; thus we established a bacterial expression system based on pET28-BL21(DE3) RNase III-. Its dsRNA expression is three-fold greater than that of the widely-used dsRNA expression system L4440-HT115 (DE3), which has increased utility for large-scale dsRNA production with low cost33. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 5a, b, dsPiHmp1 and dsPiCut3 were tandemly constructed in the pET28a vector and co-expressed in our bacterial expression system. The bacteria were lysed using lysozyme, incubated with SPc, and then analyzed for protective effects on leaves. The RNAi efficiency of SPc-loaded dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 produced by the bacterial system was comparable to in vitro-synthesized dsRNA, and the detached potato leaves treated with dsPiHmp1+PiCut3/SPc complex showed no disease symptoms, confirming its protective effect (Supplementary Fig. 5c–e).

Nano-enabled elicitor amplifies the defense responses of plants

To further increase the control efficacy of the dsPiHmp1+PiCut3/SPc complex for field application, a plant elicitor cellobiose (4-OR-β-D-glucopyranosyl-β-D-glucopyranose) was introduced to construct a multicomponent nano-bioprotectant. Studies have shown that cellobiose can be effectively sensed by plants to activate defense signaling against diseases34. Our results revealed that SPc could self-assemble with cellobiose with a drug loading content of 12.70 ± 1.07% (Supplementary Table 1). The cellobiose/SPc complex activated endocytosis in potato cells, evidenced by up-regulation of the EH-domain-binding protein gene (StEPSIN), protein-sorting-associated protein 36 gene (StVPS36), vesicle-associated membrane protein gene (StVAMP1-2, StVAMP3-1) and Ras-related in brain gene (StRab) by 1.4 to 2.9-fold compared with cellobiose alone (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Furthermore, plant defense genes such as pathogenesis-related protein 1 (StPR1), StWRKY1, polyphenol oxidase (StPPO) and StPTI5, induced by cellobiose, were further up-regulated in combination with SPc. The defense-associated transcription factor StWRKY1 was prominent among the genes tested, being up-regulated by 920-fold (Supplementary Fig. 6b). Two antimicrobial phytoalexins genes related to synthesis of coumarin and epicatechin were also up-regulated by 2.5 and 24-fold, and coumarin content was significantly increased by 2.1-fold (Supplementary Fig. 6c–f). SPc alone did not cause up-regulation of immune genes (Supplementary Fig. 7). The above results illustrated that SPc could amplify the cellobiose-induced defense responses by enhancing endocytosis, consistent with reports by Wang et al.35 and Ma et al.25.

Self-assembly mechanism of multicomponent nano-bioprotectant

Nanoparticle-based gene/drug co-delivery systems have shown many advantages since the first application in the cancer therapy field36. SPc is a multifunctional nanoparticle that can co-deliver dsRNA and bioprotectant for insect pest control37. The current study constructed a multicomponent nano-bioprotectant based on dsRNA and a plant elicitor, which has potential to enhance the antimicrobial bioactivity from two angles for green management of potato late blight. The self-assembly of the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant was investigated using isothermal titration calorimetry (Fig. 2). The cellobiose solution was titrated with SPc aqueous solution to determine their interaction (Supplementary Fig. 8a). The low dissociation constant (Kd) of 4.075×10−6 M suggested the effective interaction between SPc and cellobiose. The positive values of ΔH and ΔS suggested that noncovalent molecular interactions, such as hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions, performed a dominant role in the self-assembly of the cellobiose/SPc complex. To further investigate the complexation of cellobiose/SPc complex with dsRNA, excessive cellobiose was first incubated with SPc, and then dialyzed to obtain pure cellobiose/SPc complex, which was further titrated with dseGFP aqueous solution. As shown in Fig. 2b, there was an effective, automatic and strong binding force between cellobiose/SPc complex and dseGFP. Meanwhile, values of ∆H and ∆S revealed that the further self-assembly was driven by hydrogen bond and Van der Waals forces. In addition, the agarose gel retardation assay suggested that electrostatic interactions also played an important role in self-assembly of the multicomponent complex (Supplementary Fig. 8b).

Fig. 2: Self-assembly mechanism of cellobiose/SPc/dsRNA complex.
figure 2

a Schematic illustration of self-assembled cellobiose/SPc/dsRNA complex. b, b-1 ITC titration of dseGFP solution (0.67 ×10−6 mol/L) into cellobiose/complex (1.4 × 10−6 mol/L). c–h TEM images (ce) and particle size distributions (fh) of cellobiose, cellobiose/SPc complex and cellobiose/SPc/dseGFP complex. The number indicates the average particle size. Data are from three biological replicates. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The bioactivity of the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant was directly related to its particle size and morphology, which were analyzed using dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 2c–h). The morphology of SPc is approximately spherical with a size of nearly 100 nm (Supplementary Fig. 8c, d). Cellobiose self-aggregated into nearly spherical particles of 219 nm diameter. Its complexation with SPc decreased the particle size to 35 nm, which was similar to previous studies that demonstrated SPc can decrease the particle sizes of various pesticides in aqueous solution38,39. Interestingly, the particle size of cellobiose/SPc/dseGFP complex increased to 88 nm due to the adhesion of dseGFP to the surface of the cellobiose/SPc complex. Anthrone-sulfuric acid colorimetry was performed for quantitative analysis of cellobiose content in the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant. The cellobiose content was determined according to the standard curve after 12 h dialysis of cellobiose/SPc/dseGFP complex (Supplementary Fig. 8e). Based on the binding mass ratio of cellobiose/SPc complex to dseGFP in an agarose gel retardation assay, the mass ratio of each component in the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant was 53 (cellobiose): 1000 (SPc): 1000 (dseGFP). The multicomponent nano-bioprotectant could still protect dsRNA from degradation, and deliver dsRNA to P. infestans and plant cells (Supplementary Fig. 9).

Protective effect of multicomponent nano-bioprotectant

To assess the protective effect of the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant on whole plants, disease protection assays were performed under greenhouse and field conditions. In the greenhouse, spraying with the dsRNA/SPc, cellobiose/SPc, and multicomponent nano-bioprotectant all provided protection against late blight on potato plants (Fig. 3a, b), which was confirmed by P. infestans biomass testing results (Fig. 3c). The above three treatments showed smaller amounts of pathogen compared to control and other treatments. There were no marked differences among the above three treatments (Fig. 3c). No defects in the growth of potato plants were observed after any of the treatments. Under field conditions, the seedlings were sprayed with the formulations described above from the second day after the initial spots of late blight were discovered. Due to the suitable climate and susceptible varieties, P. infestans infected rapidly and killed nearly all potato foliage in control (water) treatments. By contrast, the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant exhibited the best protective effect with the lowest disease index (20), and its protective effect (68%) was significantly higher than that (53%) of the widely-used mancozeb fungicide at 29 dpi (Fig. 3d–g). Due to the SPc-based nano-delivery system, the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant could not only enter P. infestans cells more efficiently for gene silencing, but also enhanced the systemic resistance of plants.

Fig. 3: Stronger protective effect of multicomponent nano-bioprotectant toward potted plants in the greenhouse, and under field conditions.
figure 3

ac The multicomponent nano-bioprotectant exhibited stronger protective effect on whole plants grown in pots. Various formulations were sprayed onto whole plants (ddH2O was used as control) and sporangia suspension was then sprayed onto plant leaves after 24 h. a Representative photos were acquired at 6 dpi, and then (b) disease index and (c) relative biomass was quantified (n = 3 biological replicates). Different letters above each bar indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 as determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison post hoc test. Bars represent the mean ± SE. d-g, Control efficacy of the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant against potato late blight under field conditions. d Disease index was calculated at 7, 14, 19, 21, 23, 25 and 29 day after the initial symptoms of late blight were discovered. Bars represent the mean ± SE. e The protective effect was calculated for each treatment at 29 days, analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison post hoc test. Bars represent the mean ± SE. f AUPDC value was calculated after 29 days. The field experiments for each treatment included three random replicate plots. g Representative photos were taken at 29 days. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

In summary, we applied the SPc-based dsRNA nano-delivery system to perform RNAi in a recalcitrant pathogen, eliminating the dsRNA delivery barrier to broaden the application of RNAi. We co-expressed the dsRNAs of two target genes in a bacterial system to provide a high yield, achieving high production at low cost to meet the demands necessary for field application. We prepared a nano-sized plant elicitor using SPc, amplifying plant defense responses against pathogens. Based on the technologies developed here, we designed a self-assembled multicomponent nano-bioprotectant, realizing sustainable green management of potato late blight via the angles of pathogen inhibition and elevated plant defense (Supplementary Fig. 10). We propose the strategy could be useful for pesticide/drug design and green management of devastating plant diseases and pests.

Methods

Synthesis of SPc and dsRNA in vitro

SPc was synthesized according to the method described by Li et al.27. In brief, the star initiator Pt-Br was synthesized using commercial pentaerythritol; the polymerization of star initiator with DMAEMA (2-(Dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate) was carried out under nitrogen atmosphere. The solvent tetrahydrofuran was removed by a rotary evaporator and reused at the end of polymerization to decrease the production cost. Subsequently, dialysis was carried out to purify the crude product in ddH2O four times, and the final SPc product was obtained as white powder after freeze-drying.

For dsRNA synthesis, total RNA was extracted from P. infestans strain T30-440 using RNA Simple Total RNA Kit (Tiangen Co., China), and 2 μg of RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using the PrimeScriptTM RT Reagent Kit (Takara Co., Japan). Templates of the pathogenesis genes PiHmp1 (PITG_00375; XP_002908980) and PiCut3 (PITG_12361; XM_002900240) were amplified using the above cDNA, cloned into pMD19T-Vector (Takara Co. D102A.) and transformed into Escherichia coli strain DH5α (Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd, China). The plasmid was extracted and verified by Sanger sequencing, and then used for dsRNA synthesis using T7 RiboMAX Express RNAi System (Promega Co., USA). The enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) gene was amplified by PCR using the template of pB7WGF2 containing the eGFP gene. Fluorescent dseGFP was synthesized using a Fluorescein dsRNA Labeling Kit (Roche Co. USA). All primers (Sangon biotech Co. China) are shown in Supplementary Table 2.

To determine whether the fluorescence intensity of dseGFP was changed after its self-assembly with SPc, ELIASA (Molecular Devices) was used to measure the 488-520 nm fluorescence intensity of dseGFP and dseGFP/SPc complex (dseGFP amount was 170 ng). A UV-visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to measure the full UV absorption spectra of SPc, dseGFP and dseGFP/SPc complex (final concentration for dseGFP: 20 ng/μL), respectively. Each treatment included three independent samples.

Stability test of SPc-loaded dsRNA

A gel retardation test was first performed to determine the best mass ratio for the combination of dsRNA with SPc. The dsPiCut3 (500 ng) was mixed with SPc at various mass ratios, and the mixture (8 μL) was incubated at room temperature for 15 min and then analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. To confirm the fast degradation of dsRNA by RNase A, 1 μg of dsPiCut3 was mixed with different quantities of RNase A (Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd). According to the information provided by the manufacturer (Thermo Co. USA), RNase A can degrade dsRNA under low salt conditions as used in this study. The mixture was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C, and then detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. To investigate the protective effect of SPc on dsRNA, dsPiCut3 was mixed with SPc at the best mass ratio, and treated with RNase A. The dsPiCut3/SPc complex was decomplexed in 0.3% SDS solution and analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis. Naked dsPiCut3 was employed as control. The relative band density was determined using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, USA). Each treatment included three independent samples.

Uptake efficiency assay of SPc-loaded dsRNA

Two P. infestans strains, MZ and tdT-88069, were employed to determine the delivery efficiency of SPc-loaded dsRNA into sporangia and hyphae. The MZ strain was cultured on Rye A agar (1000 mL ddH2O containing 60 g rye extract, 20 g sucrose and 15 g agar) in darkness at 18 °C for 2 weeks. Five μL of fluorescent dseGFP (500 ng/μL) and dseGFP/SPc complex were respectively mixed with 5 μL of sporangia suspension and hyphae (12 days) (105 sporangia/mL), then dropped inoculated onto Rye A agar, and cultured in darkness at 18 °C for 12 h. Fluorescence images were captured and analyzed using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope (Leica Co., Germany), and the fluorescence intensity was measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA). Each treatment was repeated six times.

Potato and N. benthamiana were employed to determine the delivery efficiency of SPc-loaded dsRNA. For the potato uptake assay, 5 μL of 500 ng/μL fluorescent dseGFP and dseGFP/SPc complex were applied separately as droplets on the detached leaves, and fluorescence images were taken at 12 h after application. Similar experiments were performed with detached leaves and roots of N. benthamiana.

The tdT-88069 strain expressing tandem dimer Tomato fluorescent (tdTomato) protein was cultured on Rye A agar containing geneticin (50 mg/L). The dstdTomato (205 bp) was synthesized in vitro. Similarly, five μL of dstdTomato (500 ng/μL), dstdTomato/SPc complex and control (SPc, dsPiCut3 and dsPiCut3/SPc complex) were used to treat 5 μL of tdT-88069 sporangia suspension (105 sporangia/mL), and red fluorescence was detected with an argon laser at 587 nm and analyzed using the confocal microscope. The silencing efficiency of tdTomato was also examined using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Total RNA was extracted from tdT-88069 strain and reverse-transcribed to cDNA. The qRT-PCR was performed with a QuantStudioTM 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) using Power SYBR® Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Reactions were performed in triplicate using the following conditions: pre-denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s, and annealing at 60 °C for 30 s. The P. infestans actin gene (XM_002897714.1) transcript was used as an internal control using the 2-ΔΔCT method41. Each treatment was repeated three times.

Elevated bioactivity assay of dsPiHmp1 and dsPiCut3 with the aid of SPc

Potato cv. Favorita was used in the current study due to its high susceptibility to P. infestans. Potato plants were grown in a soil-less mix consisting of a 1:1 (v:v) peat-vermiculite mix until 15 cm height in the greenhouse (60–70% RH, 12 h light/day). The detached potato leaves were sprayed with SPc, dsPiHmp1 (500 ng/μL), dsPiCut3 (500 ng/μL) and their SPc-loaded complexes with the application amount of 200 μL per leaf; ddH2O was applied as control. After 24 h, 10 μL of sporangial suspension (104 sporangia/mL) (MZ) was inoculated onto the abaxial side of leaves and incubated in moist sealed boxes at 20 ˚C with 12 h light/day. The lesion area was measured at 2, 5 and 15 dpi. Each treatment was repeated three times.

Construction of dsPiHmp1+PiCut3/SPc complex and its protection assay

dsPiHmp1 and dsPiCut3 were co-expressed in vivo for large batch dsRNA production. Two genes were tandemly constructed into pET28a (386595) vector and then co-expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) RNase III- system. A single colony was selected and cultured in 5 mL LB liquid medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 mg/L), followed by overnight shaking at 37 °C. The culture medium was added to new LB medium with kanamycin, and then cultured at 37 °C until the OD600 nm reached 0.55. The culture incubation was continued for 4 h after adding isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) (1 mM) for dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 expression. Five mL of LB culture was heated for 20 min at 80 °C, and 75% ethanol added to break the bacterial cell wall. The expressed dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 was dissolved in NaCl solution (150 mM). The obtained dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 was purified by RNA clean kit (Tiangen Co., China) and quantified using NanoDrop2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., USA).

The dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 was mixed with SPc at the mass ratio of 1:1 to prepare the dsPiHmp1+PiCut3/SPc complex. Subsequently, the silencing efficiency in P. infestans was examined at 24 h after the treatment using qRT-PCR. The protective effect was further confirmed on detached potato leaves similarly as above. Each treatment was repeated three times.

Bioactivity assay of cellobiose with the aid of SPc

To investigate the loading capacity of SPc toward cellobiose, 100 mg of SPc and cellobiose were both dissolved in 10 mL of ddH2O and stirred for 2 h. The mixture was dialyzed using regenerated cellulose with a molecular weight cut-off of 1000 Da (Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., China) for 12 h to obtain pure cellobiose/SPc complex. After freeze-drying, product powder was weighed and calculated using the following formula:

$${{{\rm{Drug}}}}\; {{{\rm{loading}}}}\; {{{\rm{content}}}}\,({{{\rm{DLC}}}},\%)\,=\, {{{\rm{weight}}}}\; {{{\rm{of}}}}\; {{{\rm{drug}}}}\; {{{\rm{loaded}}}}\; {{{\rm{in}}}}\; {{{\rm{complex}}}}/\\ {{{\rm{weight}}}}\; {{{\rm{of}}}}\; {{{\rm{drug}}}}-{{{\rm{loaded}}}}\; {{{\rm{complex}}}}\times 100$$
(1)

The experiment was repeated three times.

To determine the immunity response induced by cellobiose in potato, four-week-old potato leaves were sprayed with cellobiose (138 mg/L) and cellobiose/SPc complex prepared according to the DLC using an application volume of 200 μL; ddH2O and SPc (1.815 mg/mL) were applied as controls. RNA was extracted from leaves at 24 h after the spray to examine the expression of cellobiose-induced immunity genes such as StPR1 (XM_006367028.1), StPPO (U22921.1), StPTI5 (XM_006367134.2), StWRKY1 (NM_001288675.1), StCoum (OL412004.1) and StEpic (XM_006349390.2) using qRT-PCR. The relative mRNA levels were normalized to the abundance of a housekeeping gene in potato (Elongation factor 1 alpha, XM_022311019.1) using the 2-ΔΔCT method41. The endocytosis-related genes StEPSIN (XM_006349904.1), StVPS36 (XM_006347647.2), StVAMP1-2 (XM_006364202.2), StVAMP3-1 (XM_049539029.1) and StRab (CP055242.1) were also investigated. Each treatment was repeated three times.

As a phytoalexin, coumarin content was further examined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Coumarin was extracted from 5 g of potato leaves using 50% methanol. After centrifugation, 8 mL of the supernatant was evaporated using a gentle stream of nitrogen, and then dissolved in 200 μL 50% methanol. Samples were separated using an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 3.5 μm) by an Agilent 1260 infinity HPLC system (Agilent Co. USA). The mobile phases consisted of water (A) and acetonitrile (B), both of which contained 0.1% formic acid (v/v). The gradient run was initiated with 5% B for 3 min, then increased to 90% B in the next 20 min linearly at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The HPLC system was coupled online with an Agilent 6520 Q-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with an ESI ion source. The MS parameters were as follow: positive ion mode, gas temperature 325°C, drying gas flow 13 L/min and VCap 4.0 kV. The raw MS data were analyzed by MassHunter (Agilent Co.). Standard curves were obtained from the chromatographic data of standard coumarin with various qualities. Three biological replicates were independently tested for each treatment.

Preparation and characterization of cellobiose/SPc/dsRNA complex

Excess cellobiose was mixed with SPc at the mass ratio of 1:1 in aqueous solution, and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. The mixture was dialyzed to obtain pure cellobiose/SPc complex. The cellobiose/SPc complex was further incubated with dseGFP at the mass ratio of 1:1 (SPc: dseGFP) and dialyzed for 12 h to prepare cellobiose/SPc/dsRNA complex.

The size and morphology of cellobiose/SPc/dsRNA complexes were investigated using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscope (TEM), respectively. The particle sizes of SPc (1 mg/mL), cellobiose (1 mg/mL), cellobiose/SPc complex (1 mg/mL) and cellobiose/SPc/dseGFP complex (0.5 mg/mL) were measured in triplicate at 25 °C using DLS (Malvern Instruments Ltd., UK). Their morphologies were further examined using TEM (JEOL-1200, Japan). Five µL of each sample were applied as droplets on the carbon support film, and then air-dried before TEM observation.

Self-assembly and component quantification of cellobiose/SPc/dsRNA complex

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) can accurately reflect the thermodynamic parameters of the intermolecular interaction between two substances, and thus suggest the dominant interaction force42. One mL cellobiose (0.138 × 10−3 mol/L) was titrated with 500 µL SPc aqueous solution (0.1 × 10−3 mol/L) in a Nano ITC (TA Instruments Waters, USA) to examine the interaction between cellobiose and SPc. ITC titration of dseGFP (0.67 × 10−6 mol/L) into cellobiose/SPc complex (1.4 × 10−6 mol/L) was performed to further illustrate the self-assembly of cellobiose/SPc/dsRNA complex. The heat of interaction during each injection was calculated by the integration of each titration peak using Origin7 software (OriginLab Co., USA). The test temperature was 25 °C, and the ΔG was calculated using the following formula:

$$\Delta {{{\rm{G}}}}\,=\,\Delta {{{\rm{H}}}}-{{{\rm{T}}}}\Delta {{{\rm{S}}}}$$
(2)

Component quantification of the cellobiose/SPc/dsRNA complex was performed using agarose gel retardation assay and anthrone-sulfuric acid colorimetry. Pure cellobiose/SPc complex was mixed with dseGFP at the mass ratio of 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 (SPc: dseGFP), and each mixture was analyzed by agarose gel retardation assay. Anthrone-sulfuric acid colorimetry was performed for cellobiose quantification assay. The absorbance of cellobiose at various concentrations was measured at 630 nm after reacting with concentrated sulfuric acid and anthrone to obtain the standard curve. Cellobiose absorbance was measured after the dialysis of cellobiose/SPc/dseGFP complex for another 12 h, and the cellobiose content was calculated.

Stability test and uptake efficiency assay of multicomponent nano-bioprotectant

To investigate the stability of dsRNA in the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant, cellobiose/SPc/dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 complex (cellobiose: 53 ng; SPc: 1 μg; dsRNA: 1 μg) was treated with RNase A (20 ng), and analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis. Naked dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 was employed as control. Each treatment included three independent samples.

Multicomponent nano-bioprotectant containing 2.5 μg fluorescent dseGFP was mixed with sporangia suspension, then droplet inoculated on Rye A agar, and cultured in darkness at 18 °C for 12 h. For plant uptake assays, the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant was applied as droplets on the detached leaves, and fluorescence images were taken at 12 h after application and analyzed. Each treatment was repeated six times.

Protection assay of multicomponent nano- bioprotectant on whole potato plants in greenhouse pots and field

For dsRNA release from the bacteria, lysozyme was added into LB cultures to the final concentration of 1.3 mg/mL for 30 min to break bacterial cell walls, and the mixture was incubated at 75 °C for 5 min to kill the remaining bacteria. The obtained dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 was purified by RNA clean kit (Tiangen Co. China, Cat.#: 4992728) and quantified using a NanoDrop2000 spectrophotometer to prepare the multicomponent nano-bioprotectant. The cellobiose was firstly mixed with SPc according to the component quantification of cellobiose/SPc/dsRNA complex, and then assembled with dsRNA at the final concentration of 24 mg/L (dsRNA).

Four-week-old potato plants were sprayed with the formulations of cellobiose (138 mg/L), cellobiose/SPc complex (cellobiose: 138 mg/L), naked dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 (24 mg/L), dsPiHmp1+PiCut3/SPc complex (dsRNA: 24 mg/L), cellobiose/SPc/dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 complex (cellobiose: 138 mg/L; SPc: 2.76 g/L; dsRNA: 24 mg/L) as well as controls water and SPc (2.76 g/L) on both sides of the leaf surfaces using an atomizer. All plants were sprayed with P. infestans (MZ) sporangia suspension (1.5 × 104 sporangia/mL) at 24 h after the treatment and incubated at 20˚C with 60–70% relative humidity, 12 h light/day. Representative infected leaflets were chosen for photography. The relative biomass of P. infestans/potato was quantified using qRT-PCR at 6 dpi43. Each treatment included three potted plants and was repeated three times.

The field trial was carried out to determine the protective effects of various formulations in a potato field (Chengde, Hebei province, China) where naturally occurring late blight was prevalent due to the suitable climate. The P. infestans susceptible cv. Wotu 5 was grown. The field trials were at different geographical locations (different fields), sown on separate dates between April 1 to 10. There were three trials of the experiments. Plots were randomly assorted, each treatment contained three field plots, and each field plot was 20 m2. Plots were treated with cellobiose/dsRNA/SPc and other treatments on the same dates between July 1-29, since the first late blight disease symptoms were observed at that time. Various formulations were prepared similarly as described above, and sprayed onto the foliage immediately after the first disease symptoms were observed. Formulations included water (control), commercial fungicide Mancozeb (Shuangji Co., China) (local application amount: 5.6 kg/ha), cellobiose/SPc complex, dsPiHmp1+PiCut3/SPc complex and cellobiose/SPc/dsPiHmp1+PiCut3 complex. Disease records were taken at various time intervals by visually assessing the percent of the blighted leaf area per plant. The leaf disease index and protective effect were assessed using the following formula44. Protection effect was assessed by disease index.

$${Disease}\,{index}\,=\, \sum \frac{({the}\,{number}\,{of}\,{samples}\times {Disease}\,{grade})}{\left({total}\,{sample}\,{size}\times {Highest}\,{disease}\,{class}\right)}\times 100$$
(3)
$${Percent}\,{of}\,{time}\,{duration}\,{protection}\,=\, 1-\frac{{Mean}\,{treated}\,{disease}\,{index}}{{Control}\,{isease}\,{index}}\times 100$$
(4)

Control efficacy of season-long protection for each formulation was calculated as the mean area under disease progress curves (AUDPCs)45 for all treatment plots. The potato disease classification method was adopted according to the 9 grades classification standard of CIP (International Potato Center) (Supplementary Table 3).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., USA). Independent t-test was used to determine the significant differences between two samples. The other data were analyzed using the Tukey HSD test at the P value < 0.05 level of significance. The descriptive statistics are shown as the mean value and standard errors of the mean.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.