Abstract
We investigate the voltage control of magnetism in a van der Waals (vdW) heterostructure device consisting of two distinct vdW materials, the ferromagnetic Fe3-xGeTe2 and the ferroelectric In2Se3. It is observed that gate voltages applied to the Fe3-xGeTe2/In2Se3 heterostructure device modulate the magnetic properties of Fe3-xGeTe2 with significant decrease in coercive field for both positive and negative voltages. Raman spectroscopy on the heterostructure device shows voltage-dependent increase in the in-plane In2Se3 and Fe3-xGeTe2 lattice constants for both voltage polarities. Thus, the voltage-dependent decrease in the Fe3-xGeTe2 coercive field, regardless of the gate voltage polarity, can be attributed to the presence of in-plane tensile strain. This is supported by density functional theory calculations showing tensile-strain-induced reduction of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy, which in turn decreases the coercive field. Our results demonstrate an effective method to realize low-power voltage-controlled vdW spintronic devices utilizing the magnetoelectric effect in vdW ferromagnetic/ferroelectric heterostructures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The magnetoelectric effect is a classical topic in material science and physics. In magnetoelectric materials, the electric and magnetic properties are coupled: the magnetic moments (electric dipoles) can be manipulated by the electric (magnetic) field1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. The interactions between the distinct magnetic and electric order parameters, along with the associated atomic, ionic, or molecular structure, can result in emergence of rich and intriguing physical phenomena. An effective strategy to achieve the magnetoelectric effect is to combine materials with distinct ferroic orders. For instance, in a ferromagnetic/ferroelectric composite system, the electric-field-controlled polarization or strain in the ferroelectric can induce modulation of the magnetic properties in the adjacent ferromagnet5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. When utilized in nano-electronic devices, these composite systems offer multifunctional and advanced device characteristics that cannot be attained by the constituent materials independently8,9,13.
In this article, we experimentally demonstrate the magnetoelectric effect in a van der Waals (vdW) material heterostructure, consisting of a ferromagnetic and a ferroelectric vdW material. Ferromagnetic/ferroelectric vdW heterostructures offer unique advantages over conventional thin-film-based composite systems to investigate the magnetoelectric effect. (1) Heterostructures composed of various families of vdW materials can be readily fabricated by mechanical exfoliation, transfer, and stacking, which makes it possible to investigate new functionalities arising from the interplay between symmetry-breaking orderings, that are separately present in the constituent materials, through interfacial coupling14,15. (2) Various fundamental material properties of two-dimensional (2D) vdW materials can be functionally controlled through strain, gating, proximity effect, and twist angle, which facilitates the controllability of vdW materials via external methods16. (3) The weak interlayer magnetic interactions make vdW ferromagnets an ideal material platform to investigate interfacial interactions, i.e., the coupling at the ferromagnetic/ferroelectric interface can play a more prominent role since the ferroic orderings within the component materials are not too strong. A recent study shows that interfacial magnetic effects can indeed be enhanced when the interlayer magnetic coupling is weak17.
Given these advantages, it is natural to conceive a vdW-material-based device consisting of a ferromagnetic and a ferroelectric vdW material in which the change in the polarization by applied electric field can modify the properties of the ferromagnet by interfacial coupling. In fact, theoretical studies suggest the possibility of magnetoelectric interactions between vdW materials18,19,20,21,22. Yet, the voltage-controlled magnetoelectric effect in vdW heterostructures, consisting of two functional vdW materials, has not been experimentally demonstrated so far.
Here, we study the voltage control of magnetism in a vdW heterostructure device consisting of a ferromagnetic Fe3-xGeTe2 (x ≈ 0.36) layer and a ferroelectric α-In2Se3 layer. Fe3-xGeTe2 (FGT), which is a hole-doped version of Fe3GeTe223,24, is a vdW ferromagnetic metal with bulk Curie temperature TC around 150 K and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy25,26,27. Large doping-dependent modulation of TC and coercive field is reported; these doping effects are closely related with the change in magnetocrystalline anisotropy induced by shifts in the energy bands28. This intricate relationship between electronic structures and magnetic anisotropy facilitates the capability to electrically control magnetism by changing the electronic structures, as the magnetic anisotropy acts as an energy barrier in the magnetization switching process. The non-centrosymmetric α-In2Se3 (IS) is a vdW semiconductor that exhibits room temperature ferroelectricity, showing a relatively small ferroelectric coercivity of ~2 × 107 V m−129,30,31,32. Due to the voltage-dependent expansion of in-plane lattice constants33,34,35, a large piezoelectric effect is expected which allows the control of in-plane strain and surface charges by applied voltage.
In our experiments, the magnetic properties of FGT are measured while applying an external voltage to the FGT/IS vdW heterostructure, using a magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE) microscopy system. We find that the magnetic properties of FGT show a sizeable voltage-dependent change where the decrease in coercive field is observed in both positive and negative voltages. This unusual homopolar behavior is further investigated by voltage-dependent Raman micro-spectroscopy which confirms the existence of piezoelectric strain in the FGT/IS heterostructure providing tensile strain for both positive and negative voltages. The link between the strain and magnetic properties of FGT is investigated by first-principles density functional theory (DFT) showing substantial decrease in the magnetocrystalline anisotropy with tensile strain, which can account for the reduction of the magnetic coercivity. Our experiments and calculations demonstrate a new method of voltage-controlled magnetism via strain coupling in a vdW ferromagnetic/ferroelectric heterostructure. Furthermore, our realization of a vdW magnetoelectric device signals a major advance towards developing low-power all-2D-material-based spintronic devices36, e.g., 2D versions of energy-efficient magnetoelectric spin–orbit (MESO) devices, recently proposed in the semiconductor industry13.
Results and discussion
Device characteristics and magnetic properties
Figure 1a shows the schematic diagram of our vdW heterostructure. A ferroelectric IS flake is sandwiched between two metallic materials, FGT and graphite, where the ferromagnetic FGT also functions as a gate electrode. An optical microscopy image of the FGT/IS heterostructure is displayed in Fig. 1b (also see “Methods” section for details of the device fabrication process and layer thicknesses). In the scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of FGT/IS (Supplementary Information (SI) Fig. S1), we observe a thin (~2 nm) polymer buffer layer, unintentionally inserted between FGT and IS during the mechanical exfoliation process. This layer may in fact act as a flexible adhesive layer; earlier studies show that polymer layers can effectively transfer in-plane strain to an adjacent vdW materials37,38,39, such that it may in fact help transfer in-plane strain from the IS to FGT in this work (see “Discussion” section).
A gate voltage (VG) is applied across the IS between the FGT (top electrode) and graphite (bottom electrode); the top FGT is grounded such that negative (positive) VG denotes the FGT being at higher (lower) electric potential. The VG-dependent gate current (IG) flowing through the IS, measured under the illumination of laser at 70 K, exhibits a diode-like behavior (Fig. 1c). This originates from the Schottky barriers at the IS interfaces30. In addition, the asymmetry between the top- and bottom-electrode materials may enhance the rectification feature in our device40. The FGT magnetic properties, obtained by MOKE, show robust ferromagnetism below its TC (Fig. 1d). The square shaped out-of-plane magnetic hysteresis loop at zero bias (VG = 0 V) is consistent with the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of FGT reported previously24,28,41,42.
Voltage-dependent modulation of magnetic properties in the vdW heterostructure
Voltage-induced effects on the magnetic properties of the FGT/IS heterostructure are investigated by measuring voltage-dependent magnetic hysteresis loops. The MOKE signals were probed at the yellow spot in Fig. 1b, where the FGT overlaps the IS. The measurements were performed at T = 67 K and 80 K, below the ferromagnetic TC of FGT. The magnetic hysteresis of FGT show square-shaped loops at VG = 0 V. Note the small coercive field (e.g., ≈30 mT at 67 K) of the FGT (Fe2.64GeTe2) used in this work, which is a hole-doped version of Fe3GeTe2. Upon voltage application, the FGT magnetic properties exhibit an intriguing VG-dependent change (Fig. 2a–d). At positive VG, the coercive field (Hc) decreases as VG increases (Fig. 2a, 2c) with this VG-induced Hc decrease becoming particularly prominent for large voltages (VG = 4–5 V). For the negative VG case, Hc again decreases as the magnitude of VG increases (Fig. 2b, 2d). In Fig. 2e, Hc is plotted as a function of VG, which illustrates the VG-induced Hc decrease. It is clear that both positive and negative biases act to decrease Hc. This VG-dependent Hc decrease is consistently observed in other FGT/IS devices (SI Fig. S2). We also find that the voltage effect does not show FGT-thickness-dependence up to 20 nm (See SI Fig. S3 and discussion). To examine whether this voltage effect is reversible or remanent, we measure the hysteresis loops when VG is decreased back to zero after voltage application. Square-like loops with larger Hc reappear at VG = 0 (SI Fig. S4), implying that the VG-induced Hc modulation is reversible and mostly non-remanent. The reversible behavior is observed over 50 cycles of voltage application (SI Fig. S5), showing that this voltage-tunable magnetic effect is quite robust and stable.
In an effort to verify the role of the IS in the VG-induced Hc change in the vdW heterostructure, additional VG-dependent MOKE measurements are performed with a FGT(12 nm)/h-BN(10 nm) heterostructure device at 67 K, in which a paraelectric and insulating h-BN replaces IS. Here, the loops are unaffected by VG up to ±14 V (Fig. 2f), showing that the voltage effect does not appear when h-BN is used for voltage gating. In another control experiment, MOKE measurements on a FGT/β-In2Se3 heterostructure device, in which a non-ferroelectric β-In2Se3 is used, again does not show significant change when VG is applied (SI Fig. S6). These control experiments confirm that the presence of ferroelectric/piezoelectric IS (α-In2Se3) adjacent to FGT is essential for the emergence of the voltage effect on the FGT magnetic properties.
Given the homopolar voltage dependence of magnetic properties and absence of voltage-dependent change in the centrosymmetric substrate, we propose the interfacial coupling that transfers the strain developed in IS to FGT as the origin of the observed non-remanent voltage effect in the magnetic properties of FGT. The Raman analysis and DFT calculations that follow will confirm this. Other possible interpretations, such as current-induced effects or interfacial charge from the out-of-plane polarization, are excluded based on our experimental results.
First, current-induced Joule heating effects can be ruled out from the lack of any voltage-dependent change in the TC of the FGT in the heterostructure devices. In SI Fig. S7, we observe that the TC of the FGT flakes are ≈120 K at zero bias, and the TC shows little change with voltage application (VG = ± 4–5 V). In the discussions following the Raman analysis, we further rule out the possibility of current-induced Joule heating effects. Second, current-induced spin-torque effects can be excluded: the current density flowing through the FGT/IS hetero-junction is ~ 106 A m−2, which is ~ 5 orders of magnitude smaller than the ~1011 A m−2 current density typically required for any significant spin-transfer-torque or spin–orbit-torque effects to occur. Additionally, we do not observe any electrically induced Hc change in the region of the same FGT/IS heterostructure device where the ferroelectric IS is absent, even when the same level of current is flowing through the region (see SI Fig. S8). This effectively eliminates any possible current-induced spin-torque effects. Third, the effect of surface charge induced by the out-of-plane polarization of IS can be excluded since Hc decreases for both positive and negative voltages (Fig. 2a–c). The effect of IS surface charge would be opposite when the voltage polarity is switched. Given the previous report of remanent effect from the polarization-induced IS surface charge33, the non-remanent VG-induced Hc change (SI Fig. S4) provides further evidence that the IS surface charge is not likely responsible for the voltage effect. We also note that while the interfacial polymer layer might act as a dielectric resulting in accumulated interfacial charges induced by the IS polarization, the relatively thick metallic FGT thickness (~10 nm), compared to the electron screening length, would prevent large electron/hole doping effects despite the possible presence of accumulated interface charges; earlier studies show that extremely large electron/hole doping, rarely achievable in solid state devices, is required for significant changes in the FGT magnetic anisotropy28. Deliberately adding a thin metallic charge dissipation layer underneath the FGT might help further rule out the effect of polarization-induced surface charge modulation; this is not trivial as such control experiment is based on assumptions that the metallic layer is stretchable enough for strain-transfer across all the interfaces.
The homopolar behavior of Hc strongly suggests that the strain from the IS is the main driving force. The electric-field-induced strain modulation (or converse piezoelectric effect) of IS is identical regardless of voltage polarity as long as the external electric field (±6 V in this work) is much larger than the ferroelectric switching field of IS (i.e., below ~1 V for the 50-nm-thick IS used in this work)30,40; in such condition, the polarization is always kept parallel to the external field such that the sign of the converse piezoelectric coefficient remains the same. The amplitude of in-plane lattice expansion/contraction is determined not by the direction but by the amplitude of the out-of-plane polarization. This change in the in-plane lattice constants provides strain to the FGT by interfacial coupling, which can induce the VG-dependent Hc modulation in the FGT/IS heterostructure.
Voltage-induced tensile strain in the vdW heterostructure
In order to observe the voltage-dependent strain modulation in the heterostructure, its Raman spectra are measured as a function of VG. Raman micro-spectroscopy is a useful technique to study the local strain state of micrometer-sized flakes, since the characteristic wavenumber of phonon modes are sensitive to lattice expansion/contraction43,44,45. Figure 3a shows the VG-dependent Raman shift measured at 70 K, i.e., approximately the temperature at which the MOKE measurements are performed. We observe four peaks within the Raman shift range of 80–160 cm−1 where the Raman modes at zero bias (VG = 0 V) are indicated by vertical lines. This region of spectra allows easy tracking of both FGT and IS peaks depending on a voltage bias: two peaks observed at ~96 and ~110 cm−1 originate from the E and A1 modes of α-IS46, and the other two peaks located at ~132 and ~148 cm−1 correspond to FGT47. The comparison between spectra obtained at 70 K (solid curves) and 300 K (dashed curve; black) clearly shows the temperature-dependent Raman peak positions moving towards lower wavenumbers (or redshift) as the temperature increases; for example, the strongest IS peak is observed at 103 cm−1 at room temperature (RT; 300 K), such that the amount of redshift is ~7 cm−1 per 230 K. This redshift of the Raman peak positions is mainly due to the lattice expansion of each material and consistent with previous reports47,48,49,50.
The piezoelectric IS layer can generate strain in response to the varying VG, which would result in changes to the Raman peak positions. In order to observe any VG-dependent Raman peak position change, the VG-dependent Raman spectra are fitted with the multiple-Voigt-function model; the IS and FGT peak positions are shown as dotted gray lines in Fig. 3a, and Fig. 3b summarizes the relation between the Raman shifts and VG. For all the IS and FGT Raman peaks, we see the same trend with voltage. When VG is applied, the Raman peak positions of both IS and FGT decrease (redshift) compared to the zero bias case, regardless of polarity. This implies that the interfacial coupling between the IS and FGT layer is strong enough, such that the piezoelectric response of the IS layer is transferred to the ferromagnetic FGT layer. By analogy with the thermal-expansion-induced redshift (see previous paragraph), and from the fact that the in-plane lattice of IS expands as the out-of-plane polarization increases (opposite to conventional ferroelectrics)35, the voltage-induced redshift of the Raman peaks corresponds to an in-plane tensile strain in the heterostructure. We estimate the tensile strain of IS to be 0.3–0.4 % at VG = 5 V, based on the rate 3.1 cm−1/% of Raman shift change with respect to strain, derived by Guo et al.51 While the FGT Raman peak redshift suggests the presence of tensile strain in FGT, the exact amount of strain in the FGT cannot be estimated due to lack of earlier studies on Raman measurements of the strain state of FGT.
The polarization-induced surface charge modulation at the FGT/IS interface can once again be excluded by measuring the Raman spectra of the remanent states at zero bias after voltage application, which shows that the VG-induced Raman peak redshift disappears when the bias is decreased back to zero (SI Fig. S9). Note that any remanent in-plane strain at zero bias during the voltage-sweep, due to the remanent ferroelectric polarization, should be minimal considering that the voltage-sweep range (±6 V) is much larger than the expected ferroelectric coercivity (Ec) of the IS flake (±1 V)30. While the increase of Ec is expected at low temperatures, other well-known room temperature ferroelectric materials (e.g., BiFeO3) show 30–100% increase of Ec at cryogenic temperatures compared to room temperature52, such that the voltages we applied for the MOKE and Raman measurements are likely larger than the Ec of the IS flake even at 70 K. Also, note that the thermal effect due to Joule heating cannot explain the VG-induced peak position change in Raman spectra since the FGT peaks are generally insensitive to temperatures below ~140 K47. Furthermore, in case the Raman peak position change is purely due to Joule heating, the amount of change in the peak positions we observe (i.e., around 1–2 cm−1) would correspond to at least 30 K, assuming a linear relation between the data points at 70 and 300 K; this value is unreasonably large considering the small IG observed in the device. Therefore, we believe the VG-induced tensile strain in the FGT/IS heterostructure is the most likely origin of the consistent Raman peak redshifts that we observe.
From the experiments, it is clear that both the magnetic properties (especially, Hc) and the tensile strain in the FGT/IS heterostructure device show consistent voltage dependence. This suggests that the IS piezoelectric strain and accompanied change in lattice constants modulates the Hc of the adjacent FGT. In general, Hc of magnetic materials are determined by many material parameters, including the magnetic anisotropy, magnetization, magnetic domains, defects, etc. However, it is not likely that there will be voltage-induced changes in the defect states of the metallic FGT. We also argue that any voltage-dependent modulation of the magnetic domains would likely be a consequence of changes in the magnetic anisotropy53. Thus, it is reasonable to expect the observed reversible voltage-dependent change of Hc can most likely be attributed to a voltage-controlled modulation of either the magnetization or the magnetic anisotropy54.
Theoretical calculations: strain-induced change in magnetic anisotropy
The mechanism of the strain-induced change in the magnetic properties of FGT (e.g., magnetization, magnetic anisotropy) is investigated by first-principles density functional theory (DFT), which reveals the existence of a substantial tensile-strain-induced decrease in the FGT perpendicular magnetocrystalline anisotropy. We assume 1 hole doping (h) per formula unit (f.u.) corresponding to the Fe-deficiency x ≈ 0.36 mostly on the Fe3+ site of Fe3-xGeTe2 (FGT) (see “Methods” section and ref. 28 for details). Figure 4a presents the magnetic moment per Fe and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (MAE) with respect to the in-plane strain, where the MAE is defined as the total energy per Fe with in-plane ([210]) magnetization with respect to that with out-of-plane ([001]) magnetization; there is negligible energy change with rotation of the magnetization direction in the (001) plane. We find that there is almost no strain dependence in the magnetic moment per Fe (Fig. 4a) and also find that the MAE monotonically decreases with increasing strain (Fig. 4a), showing a significant reduction in the MAE even for small strain states (0 ~ +0.4%). These suggest that the reduced FGT magnetic anisotropy, rather than any modulation of its magnetization, is the origin of the observed tensile-strain-induced reduction in Hc. We point out that the hole doping due to the Fe deficiency in our FGT specimen is crucial for this large strain-induced change in the MAE. That is, the hole doping decreases the overall MAE and drives the system in close proximity to the tensile strain-induced transition from out-of-plane to in-plane magnetocrystalline anisotropy. As the hole doping decreases, the MAE can become relatively insensitive to the strain, or in some cases show a tensile-strain-induced MAE increase (see SI Fig. S10). This doping-dependence on the MAE-strain relation suggests that hole doping is an additional parameter that can be utilized for subtle control of the magnitude and sign of the voltage-induced MAE modulation.
Further investigation of the strain-induced change in the electronic structures (for the 1 h per f.u. case, as discussed in the previous paragraph) reveals that the tensile strain induces the momentum-dependent band shifts. This results in the decrease (increase) in MAE around the Γ(K)-point, with the net effect being the decrease in the overall MAE. The momentum-resolved MAE ξk is defined as
where \({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{IP}}}}}}}\) and \({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{OP}}}}}}}\) are eigenvalues calculated with in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OP) magnetization, respectively, N is the number of k-points, and \(f(\epsilon )\) is the Fermi-Dirac distribution. Since ξk integrated over the Brillouin zone (BZ) comes to be the MAE, by analyzing the ξk, we can identify k-points that mainly contribute to the MAE and also the momentum-dependent MAE changes with tensile strain. Figure 4b, c show the momentum-resolved MAE with 0% and 1% strain, and the difference between the two is depicted in Fig. 4d. We choose results with 0% and 1% tensile strain to depict the strain dependence more clearly. Nevertheless, the general trend is the same for smaller strain differences, consistent with the monotonic strain dependence shown in Fig. 4a. The \({{{{{{\rm{\xi }}}}}}}_{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\) areshown in the in-plane BZ, where the out-of-plane momentum (\({k}_{{{{{{\rm{z}}}}}}}\)) contribution of \({{{{{{\rm{\xi }}}}}}}_{k+{k}_{{{{{{\rm{z}}}}}}}}\) are combined for each in-plane crystal momentum k. We find that for both unstrained and strained cases, the \({\xi }_{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}\) shows a similar k-dependent pattern. As the k-vector moves away from the Γ-point, there is an alternating contribution to MAE, with negative (positive) values for small (large) magnitude of k-vectors. In the vicinity of the K-point, there is also substantial contribution to MAE, with positive MAE contribution in close proximity to the K-point and negative MAE further away from the K-point. When all the contributions in the in-plane BZ are summed, the overall MAE changes sign from positive (perpendicular anisotropy) to negative (in-plane anisotropy) with a large 1% tensile strain as shown in Fig. 4a. The difference in the k-dependent MAE between the unstrained and strained cases reveals that the negative MAE contributions around the Γ-point dominate, resulting in a net negative change in MAE.
Comparison of the band structures and the associated change in the momentum-dependent MAE reveals how the strain-induced band shifts result in the large strain-induced modulation of the total MAE. Figure 4e, f show band structures around the Fermi energy with in-plane magnetization (dotted red lines) and out-of-plane magnetization (solid black lines) with 0% and 1% tensile strain. Given the large positive eigenvalue ~8.5 eV for εnk around the Fermi energy, Eq. (1) suggest that the positive MAE at a k-point is expected when the number of occupied states with in-plane magnetization is larger than that with out-of-plane magnetization (\({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{IP}}}}}}} \, < \, {\epsilon }_{{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}} \, < \, {\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{OP}}}}}}}\)) and negative MAE for vice versa (\({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{OP}}}}}}} \, < \, {\epsilon }_{{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}} \, < \, {\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{IP}}}}}}}\)).
We find that there are two major changes in the band structures in the presence of tensile strain. First, there is splitting of the \({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{OP}}}}}}}\) bands (marked with magenta arrows), which increase the occupancy of the out-of-plane bands right at the K-points, but decrease the occupancy at k-points around the K- and H-points. Since the IP bands are relatively insensitive to the strain, this gives an overall positive MAE around the K- and H-points and small negative MAE right at the K-point as shown in Fig. 4d, g. Second, there are large upshifts of the bands around the Γ-point. Figures 4h and 4i show a magnified view of the electronic bands near the Γ-point, where the band upshift effect (i.e., increased splitting between \({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{OP}}}}}}}\) and \({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{IP}}}}}}}\)) is most clearly seen. Since \({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{OP}}}}}}} \, < \, {\epsilon }_{{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}} \, < \, {\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{IP}}}}}}}\), the increased splitting contributes to the negative MAE around the Γ-and A-points (Fig. 4d, g). We note that the reduction in MAE from the shift of bands with large \({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{IP}}}}}}}\) and \({\epsilon }_{n{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}^{{{{{{\rm{OP}}}}}}}\) band splitting away from the Fermi energy is consistent with the doping-induced reduction of MAE28. The strain-dependent analysis of the FGT band structure confirms that tensile strain can indeed induce significant modulation in its MAE, supporting our experimental results.
Discussion: role of the interfacial polymer layer in the strain-mediated magnetoelectric effect
We note that the overall homopolar voltage effect has some temperature-dependent and sample-to-sample variations (Figs. 2a–e, and SI S2). At 67 K, the voltage-dependent Hc modulation shows some polarity-dependent asymmetry, in contrast to the more or less symmetric voltage-dependent Hc modulation at 80 K. Additionally, the overall voltage-dependent Hc decrease shows some minor sample-to-sample variations (see SI Fig. S2). We suggest the properties of the polymer layer existing at the FGT/IS interface as the possible origin of these temperature-dependent and sample-to-sample variations in the detailed features of the voltage-induced Hc modulation. As discussed earlier, we believe the interfacial polymer at the FGT/IS interface acts as a flexible adhesive layer to transfer strain between the two vdW materials. Yet, there could be small variations in the amount of strain transfer for each voltage-induced-strain-application owing to its plastic properties, resulting in minor differences in the voltage dependence.
Full validation of the proposed strain-mediated mechanism requires further investigation, and we propose follow-up studies. A comparison between samples with and without interfacial polymer layers can reveal the exact role of the thin interfacial polymer layer. However, the removal of this interfacial layer has been difficult (see “Methods” section). Nevertheless, we obtain consistently similar polymer thickness under our sample fabrication conditions (see SI Fig. S11). Here, we take advantage of the polymer-mediated-strain-transfer to implement voltage-controlled magnetoelectric effect in a vdW heterostructure, and emphasize that a consistent voltage effect, i.e., the homopolar voltage-induced Hc decrease, is always observed in all the FGT/IS heterostructure devices studied.
In fact, in an earlier study55, the presence of the inverse magnetostriction effect in Fe3GeTe2 was revealed by probing the strain-dependent modulation of the magnetic properties of Fe3GeTe2 directly transferred on a flexible polyimide substrate. A large increase in the Hc of Fe3GeTe2 was reported when an in-plane tensile strain was applied to the polyimide substrate, confirming the existence of the inverse magnetostriction effect in Fe3GeTe2. The tensile-strain-induced Hc decrease that we observe in our work seems opposite to the tensile-strain-induced Hc increase in the study. However, both of these seemingly contradictory tendencies can in fact be well understood by our DFT calculation results. In SI Fig. S10, the MAE decreases with tensile strain for the 1h-doped FGT (Fe2.64GeTe2) we use in our work, but the MAE increases with strain for lower-level-hole-doping cases in agreement with the tensile-strain-induced Hc increase in the un-doped Fe3GeTe2 observed by Yu Wang et al.55
In conclusion, we investigate the voltage control of magnetism in a vdW ferromagnetic/ferroelectric FGT/IS heterostructure device. Voltage-dependent MOKE measurements on the heterostructure device show a decrease in FGT coercive field for both positive and negative biases, while voltage-dependent Raman spectroscopy reveals the existence of voltage-dependent tensile strain states of FGT and IS, regardless of voltage polarity. The consistent voltage-dependent change in both the magnetic properties and strain state suggests that the voltage-induced piezoelectric strain in IS gives rise to changes in the magnetic properties of the adjacent ferromagnetic FGT. Density functional theory calculations show a large strain-dependent change in the FGT magnetic anisotropy energy, confirming the coupling between strain and magnetism in a vdW ferromagnetic/ferroelectric heterostructure.
Methods
Single crystal growth
Single crystals of Fe2.64GeTe2 (FGT) are grown from molten metallic fluxes, as reported previously25. Single crystals of graphite, h-BN, and 2H α-In2Se3 (IS) are commercially available from HQ Graphene.
Heterostructure device fabrication
The substrate is a 5 mm × 5 mm size Si wafer with a 300-nm-thick thermally oxidized SiOx layer. Au (100 nm)/Ti (5 nm) electrodes are deposited by electron-beam evaporation after photo-lithography with AZ4210 polymer coated and baked (110 °C, 90 seconds) on the substrate. Graphite nanoflakes are exfoliated from single crystals with scotch tape onto polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) blocks, and then transferred onto Au/Ti electrodes on the substrate, which allows the Au/Ti electrodes to become closer in lateral distance. IS and FGT nanoflakes are exfoliated and transferred onto the substrate by the same dry transfer method inside an Ar-filled glovebox (H2O: <0.8 ppm; O2: <0.7 ppm) to prevent sample oxidation and degradation during fabrication. The completed device consists of a FGT/IS/graphite heterostructure in which a 12-nm-thick graphite (bottom layer) and a 10.5-nm-thick (13 layers) FGT (top layer) are spaced by a 50-nm-thick IS. The FGT is connected to the Au/Ti electrode through 5-nm-thick graphite. A large 20-nm-thick h-BN flake fully covers the FGT in order to minimize any chemical reaction or oxidation of FGT in air.
In addition to PDMS, we use various types of polymer materials (PC, PPC, gel-pak) for this dry transfer method, and as discussed in the main text, we always find the presence of an interfacial polymer layer. Typically, releasing the vdW material cleanly from the polymer requires a heating process. The difficulty lies in that the heating process should be limited when handling FGT; the ferromagnetic properties of FGT disappear after high-temperature (>80 °C) annealing. Additionally, applying chemical or etching methods, which alters the ferroelectric and ferromagnetic properties of the IS and FGT, respectively, should be avoided. Due to these restrictions, we are not able to prepare polymer-free interfaces with the dry transfer method. Nevertheless. the voltage effect on the FGT magnetic properties is consistently observed regardless of the polymer material used for the fabrication process (see SI Fig. S11 for samples fabricated by the dry transfer method using gel-pak).
TEM measurement
The TEM specimens are prepared by a focused ion beam (Hitachi; NX5000) using Ga and Ar ions. The high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) STEM images are acquired using monochromated and Cs-corrected TEM (FEI;Titan S80 − 300) equipped with a Gatan energy filter (GATAN; GIF Quantum ERS System, model 966). The energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectra and maps are obtained from multiple EDS detector TEMs (FEI; Talos F200X).
Magnetic measurements
Magnetic hysteresis loops of FGT are measured at cryogenic temperatures by a polar (out-of-plane) MOKE measurement system built by Neoark Corporation. The MOKE system has Kerr rotation detection sensitivity <0.1 mrad, and utilizes a polarized 408 nm diode laser. The measuring laser beam spot size (FWHM) is ~2 μm on the sample, but due to the Gaussian shape of the beam, signals can be detected >5 μm away from the center. Considering the small lateral size of the FGT/IS heterostructure (5–10 μm), the obtained Kerr rotation is the magnetic signal averaged over a majority of the heterostructure device. Yet, it is possible that some part of the Gaussian-shaped laser beam can drift outside of the heterostructure, i.e., where there is no FGT layer, in the presence of inevitable random sample drifts, which can result in some variation in the Kerr rotation signals. The MOKE data are averaged over 3–10 measurements in order to compensate, to some degree, for this measurement-to-measurement variation issue. The gate voltage VG is always applied through the graphite under IS while FGT is grounded (Fig. 1b).
Raman spectroscopy measurements
Raman measurements are conducted at 300 and 70 K with a micro-Raman spectrometer with 1200 g mm-1 (Princeton Instruments; HRS-500) and a cryogenically cooled Si CCD camera (Princeton Instruments; PyLoN-100BRX) at the Multidimensional Materials Research Center (MMRC) of Kyung Hee University. A 514.4-nm CW laser (Cobolt; Fandango), whose bandwidth is further narrowed using Optigrate’s Bragg grating bandpass and notch filters for low energy Raman measurement, is attenuated with one of the selected neutral density (ND) filters and focused down to a 2 μm spot on the samples. The spectral resolution is 1 cm−1. The Raman peak positions are determined by fitting the measured data using the multiple-Voigt-function-model43,56. Multiple peaks are simultaneously fitted and the best-fit parameters (positions, heights, and widths) are found. The peak positions determined from the best-fit are plotted in Fig. 3b and Fig. S9b. In our experiments, we observe small fluctuations in the Si Raman peak positions; this could be due to simple measurement errors, or small changes in the calibration. This implies that there will be inevitable fluctuations in the IS or FGT Raman peak positions, which we define as the error in determining the IS or FGT Raman peak positions. Thus, using the measured Si peak fluctuation, Si peak FWHM, and FGT or IS peak FWHM, we can estimate
The gate voltage VG is always applied through the graphite under IS while FGT is grounded (Fig. 1b).
First-principles calculations
First-principles DFT calculations are performed using the Vienna ab-initio simulation package (VASP)57,58. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) is used for the exchange-correlation functional with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) parametrization59. The projector augmented wave method60 is used with the energy cutoff of 600 eV and Γ-point centered 16×16×5 k-point grid. Spin–orbit coupling is included. The MAE is calculated using the force theorem61,62. Hole-doping is treated by reducing the total number of electrons with compensating uniform background charge. For each hole doping case, the atomic structures are obtained by relaxing the internal atomic coordinates with inclusion of the vdW interaction using the DFT-D2 method of Grimme63 where the experimental lattice constants with Fe-deficiency (corresponding to hole doping) is used. When there are no corresponding experimental values, the lattice constants are obtained by interpolating the known the reported experimental values. The electronic structures with in-plane strain are obtained by strained-bulk calculation where the in-plane lattice constants are changed according to the strain and the out-of-plane lattice constant is determined such that the unit-cell volume is conserved. With the fixed lattice constants, the internal-coordinate relaxation is performed.
Data availability
All data generated in this study are provided in the article and Supplementary Information. Additional data and materials are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
References
Röntgen, W. C. Ueber die durch bewegung eines im homogenen electrischen felde befindlichen dielectricums hervorgerufene electrodynamische kraft. Ann. Phys. 271, 264–270 (1888).
Spaldin, N. A. & Fiebig, M. The renaissance of magnetoelectric multiferroics. Science 309, 391–392 (2005).
Ramesh, R. & Spaldin, N. A. Multiferroics: progress and prospects in thin films. Nat. Mater. 6, 21–29 (2007).
Bibes, M. Nanoferronics is a winning combination. Nat. Mater. 11, 354–357 (2012).
Hu, J. M., Chen, L. Q. & Nan, C. W. Multiferroic heterostructures integrating ferroelectric and magnetic materials. Adv. Mater. 28, 15–39 (2016).
Chu, Y.-H. et al. Electric-field control of local ferromagnetism using a magnetoelectric multiferroic. Nat. Mater. 7, 478–482 (2008).
Heron, J. et al. Deterministic switching of ferromagnetism at room temperature using an electric field. Nature 516, 370–373 (2014).
Wang, Y., Hu, J., Lin, Y. & Nan, C.-W. Multiferroic magnetoelectric composite nanostructures. NPG Asia Mater. 2, 61–68 (2010).
Liang, X., Chen, H. & Sun, N. X. Magnetoelectric materials and devices. APL Mater. 9, 041114 (2021).
Lindemann, S. et al. Low-voltage magnetoelectric coupling in membrane heterostructures. Sci. Adv. 7, eabh2294 (2021).
Dmitriyeva, A. et al. Magnetoelectric coupling at the Ni/Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 interface. ACS Nano 15, 14891–14902 (2021).
Peng, B. et al. Large in-plane piezo-strain enhanced voltage control of magnetic anisotropy in Si-compatible multiferroic thin films. Mater. Horiz. 9, 3013–3021 (2022).
Manipatruni, S. et al. Scalable energy-efficient magnetoelectric spin–orbit logic. Nature 565, 35–42 (2019).
Gong, C. & Zhang, X. Two-dimensional magnetic crystals and emergent heterostructure devices. Science 363, eaav4450 (2019).
Gibertini, M., Koperski, M., Morpurgo, A. F. & Novoselov, K. S. Magnetic 2D materials and heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 408–419 (2019).
Burch, K. S., Mandrus, D. & Park, J.-G. Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials. Nature 563, 47–52 (2018).
Gweon, H. K. et al. Exchange bias in weakly interlayer-coupled van der Waals magnet Fe3GeTe2. Nano Lett. 21, 1672–1678 (2021).
Gong, C., Kim, E. M., Wang, Y., Lee, G. & Zhang, X. Multiferroicity in atomic van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–6 (2019).
Wang, W. et al. Nonvolatile magnetoelectric coupling in two-dimensional ferromagnetic-bilayer/ferroelectric van der Waals heterostructures. Nanoscale 13, 14214–14220 (2021).
Huang, X. et al. Interfacial coupling induced critical thickness for the ferroelectric bistability of two-dimensional ferromagnet/ferroelectric van der Waals heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 100, 235445 (2019).
Yan, Z., Li, Z., Han, Y., Qiao, Z. & Xu, X. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance and electroresistance in α-In2Se3-based van der Waals multiferroic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B 105, 075423 (2022).
Javaid, M., Taylor, P. D., Tawfik, S. A. & Spencer, M. J. Tuning the Schottky barrier height in a multiferroic In2Se3/Fe3GeTe2 van der Waals heterojunction. Nanoscale 14, 4114–4122 (2022).
Deiseroth, H. J., Aleksandrov, K., Reiner, C., Kienle, L. & Kremer, R. K. Fe3GeTe2 and Ni3GeTe2 – two new layered transition‐metal compounds: crystal structures, HRTEM investigations. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 1561–1567 (2006).
Fei, Z. et al. Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomically thin Fe3GeTe2. Nat. Mater. 17, 778–782 (2018).
Liu, Y., Ivanovski, V. N. & Petrovic, C. Critical behavior of the van der Waals bonded ferromagnet Fe3-xGeTe2. Phys. Rev. B 96, 144429 (2017).
Liu, Y., Stavitski, E., Attenkofer, K. & Petrovic, C. Anomalous Hall effect in the van der Waals bonded ferromagnet Fe3-xGeTe2. Phys. Rev. B 97, 165415 (2018).
León-Brito, N., Bauer, E. D., Ronning, F., Thompson, J. D. & Movshovich, R. Magnetic microstructure and magnetic properties of uniaxial itinerant ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2. J. Appl. Phys. 120, 083903 (2016).
Park, S. Y. et al. Controlling the magnetic anisotropy of the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2 through hole doping. Nano Lett. 20, 95–100 (2020).
Zhou, Y. et al. Out-of-plane piezoelectricity and ferroelectricity in layered α-In2Se3 nanoflakes. Nano Lett. 17, 5508–5513 (2017).
Wan, S. et al. Room-temperature ferroelectricity and a switchable diode effect in two-dimensional α-In2Se3 thin layers. Nanoscale 10, 14885–14892 (2018).
Xue, F. et al. Room-temperature ferroelectricity in hexagonally layered α-In2Se3 nanoflakes down to the monolayer limit. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1803738 (2018).
Li, Y., Gong, M. & Zeng, H. Atomically thin α-In2Se3: an emergent two-dimensional room temperature ferroelectric semiconductor. J. Semicond. 40, 061002 (2019).
Cui, C. et al. Intercorrelated in-plane and out-of-plane ferroelectricity in ultrathin two-dimensional layered semiconductor In2Se3. Nano Lett. 18, 1253–1258 (2018).
Xue, F. et al. Multidirection piezoelectricity in mono-and multilayered hexagonal α-In2Se3. ACS Nano 12, 4976–4983 (2018).
Yuan, S. et al. Enhanced piezoelectric response of layered In2Se3/MoS2 nanosheet-based van der Waals heterostructures. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 11979–11986 (2020).
Yang, H. et al. Two-dimensional materials prospects for non-volatile spintronic memories. Nature 606, 663–673 (2022).
Yan, W. et al. Giant gauge factor of van der Waals material based strain sensors. Nat. Commun. 12, 2018 (2021).
Cho, C. et al. Highly strain-tunable interlayer excitons in MoS2/WSe2 heterobilayers. Nano Lett. 21, 3956–3964 (2021).
Song, J.-Y., Yu, P.-L. & Li, J.-C. Low-temperature bending fatigue of MXene/PDMS flexible pressure sensor. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 9, 2201463 (2022).
Si, M. et al. Asymmetric metal/α-In2Se3/Si crossbar ferroelectric semiconductor junction. ACS Nano 15, 5689–5695 (2021).
Kim, K. et al. Large anomalous Hall current induced by topological nodal lines in a ferromagnetic van der Waals semimetal. Nat. Mater. 17, 794–799 (2018).
Deng, Y. et al. Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2. Nature 563, 94–99 (2018).
Pezzotti, G. Raman spectroscopy of piezoelectrics. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 211301 (2013).
Li, Q. et al. Localized strain measurement in molecular beam epitaxially grown chalcogenide thin films by micro-Raman spectroscopy. ACS Omega 5, 8090–8096 (2020).
Himcinschi, C., Guo, E.-J., Talkenberger, A., Dörr, K. & Kortus, J. Influence of piezoelectric strain on the Raman spectra of BiFeO3 films deposited on PMN-PT substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 042902 (2016).
Lewandowska, R., Bacewicz, R., Filipowicz, J. & Paszkowicz, W. Raman scattering in α-In2Se3 crystals. Mater. Res. Bull. 36, 2577–2583 (2001).
Du, L. et al. Lattice dynamics, phonon chirality, and spin–phonon coupling in 2D itinerant ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1904734 (2019).
Zhou, S., Tao, X. & Gu, Y. Thickness-dependent thermal conductivity of suspended two-dimensional single-crystal In2Se3 layers grown by chemical vapor deposition. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 4753–4758 (2016).
Igo, J. et al. Anharmonic phonon coupling in single-crystal semiconducting and metal-like van der Waals In2Se3. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 22849–22855 (2018).
Milosavljević, A. et al. Lattice dynamics and phase transitions in Fe3-xGeTe2. Phys. Rev. B 99, 214304 (2019).
Guo, F. et al. Piezoelectric biaxial strain effects on the optical and photoluminescence spectra of 2D III–VI compound α-In2Se3 nanosheets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 113101 (2020).
Botea, M. et al. Lead-free BiFeO3 thin film: ferroelectric and pyroelectric properties. Electron. Mater. 3, 173–184 (2022).
Ando, F. et al. Modulation of the magnetic domain size induced by an electric field. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 022401 (2016).
Cullity, B. D., Graham, C. D. Introduction to Magnetic Materials (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).
Wang, Y. et al. Strain-sensitive magnetization reversal of a van der Waals magnet. Adv. Mater. 32, 2004533 (2020).
Martins, L. G. P. et al. Raman evidence for pressure-induced formation of diamondene. Nat. Commun. 8, 96 (2017).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).
Daalderop, G., Kelly, P. & Schuurmans, M. First-principles calculation of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy of iron, cobalt, and nickel. Phys. Rev. B 41, 11919 (1990).
Wang, X., Wang, D.-s, Wu, R. & Freeman, A. Validity of the force theorem for magnetocrystalline anisotropy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, 337–341 (1996).
Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).
Qiu, Z. & Bader, S. D. Surface magneto-optic Kerr effect. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 1243–1255 (2000).
Acknowledgements
J.W.C., J.H.L., J.E., H.R., and C.J. were supported by the KIST Institutional Program (2E32251, 2E32252), and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (NRF-2021R1A2C2011007, NRF-2021M3H4A1A03054856, NRF-2020R1A5A1016518, and NRF-2021R1A2C2014179). S.Y.P. was supported by the NRF grant funded by the MSIT (No. 2021R1C1C1009494) and by Basic Science Research Program through the NRF funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2021R1A6A1A03043957). C.-H.Y. acknowledges the support of the Korean Government via the Creative Research Initiative Center for Lattice Defectronics (No. 2017R1A3B1023686). Materials synthesis by S.C. and C.P. was supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-SC0012704. M.C and Y.D.K was supported by the NRF grant funded the MSIT (2022R1A4A3030766, 2021R1A2C2093155). Y.D.K acknowledges MMRC of Kyung Hee University (Grant No. 2021R1A6C101A437).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.W.C. conceived the project on voltage control of magnetism in vdW heterostructures. J.H.L. designed the strain analysis investigation. S.Y.P. led and conducted the theoretical calculations and analysis. J.E. fabricated the heterostructure device with assistance from I.L. and J.Y.K., and conducted the magnetic measurements. J.E. and M.C. carried out the Raman spectroscopy measurements. J.H.L, J.E., Y.S., Y.D.K., and M.-J.S. carried out the Raman analysis. H.S. and H.J.C. conducted the TEM measurements. J.S., H.-J.C., S.-H.B., and C.-H.Y. characterized the ferroelectric properties of the device. S.C. and C.P. synthesized the FGT single crystals. J.E., J.H.L., S.P., and J.W.C wrote the manuscript, with assistance from H.R., C.J., Y.D.K., M.-J.S., and comments from all the authors. J.H.L., S.P., and J.W.C. supervised the work.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Aitian Chen and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Eom, J., Lee, I.H., Kee, J.Y. et al. Voltage control of magnetism in Fe3-xGeTe2/In2Se3 van der Waals ferromagnetic/ferroelectric heterostructures. Nat Commun 14, 5605 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41382-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41382-8
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.