Organisation of the orthobunyavirus tripodal spike and the structural changes induced by low pH and K+ during entry

Hover, Samantha; Charlton, Frank W.; Hellert, Jan; Swanson, Jessica J.; Mankouri, Jamel; Barr, John N.; Fontana, Juan

doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41205-w

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 21 September 2023

Organisation of the orthobunyavirus tripodal spike and the structural changes induced by low pH and K⁺ during entry

Nature Communications volume 14, Article number: 5885 (2023) Cite this article

1808 Accesses
1 Citations
9 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Following endocytosis, enveloped viruses employ the changing environment of maturing endosomes as cues to promote endosomal escape, a process often mediated by viral glycoproteins. We previously showed that both high [K⁺] and low pH promote entry of Bunyamwera virus (BUNV), the prototypical bunyavirus. Here, we use sub-tomogram averaging and AlphaFold, to generate a pseudo-atomic model of the whole BUNV glycoprotein envelope. We unambiguously locate the Gc fusion domain and its chaperone Gn within the floor domain of the spike. Furthermore, viral incubation at low pH and high [K⁺], reminiscent of endocytic conditions, results in a dramatic rearrangement of the BUNV envelope. Structural and biochemical assays indicate that pH 6.3/K⁺ in the absence of a target membrane elicits a fusion-capable triggered intermediate state of BUNV GPs; but the same conditions induce fusion when target membranes are present. Taken together, we provide mechanistic understanding of the requirements for bunyavirus entry.

Cryo-EM structures of Banna virus in multiple states reveal stepwise detachment of viral spikes

Article Open access 13 March 2024

The palisade layer of the poxvirus core is composed of flexible A10 trimers

Article Open access 05 February 2024

Visualization of conformational changes and membrane remodeling leading to genome delivery by viral class-II fusion machinery

Article Open access 15 August 2022

Introduction

The Bunyavirales constitute the largest order of enveloped negative-sense RNA viruses with over 500 named isolates. Within this group, members of the Hantaviridae, Nairoviridae, Phenuiviridae and Peribunyaviridae families possess tri-segmented genomes¹ that minimally encode an RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (L), a nucleocapsid (N) protein that encapsidates the genomic segments forming ribonucleoproteins (vRNPs), and two viral glycoproteins (GPs) Gn and Gc, which form spikes projecting from the viral envelope². Several members of these families are serious human pathogens, including La Crosse virus (LACV) (Peribunyaviridae family) which causes severe neurological encephalitis and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (Nairoviridae family) which carries a 30% fatality rate. However, no vaccines or antiviral therapies to prevent their associated disease in humans have been approved^3,4.

Bunyaviruses enter cells through the endocytic system, releasing their genomes following fusion between their envelope and vesicular membranes, mediated by the Gn-Gc spikes, which together comprise the fusion machinery. For the prototypic model peribunyavirus, Bunyamwera virus (BUNV), a low-resolution subtomogram average (STA) of the BUNV Gn-Gc ( ~ 30 Å) previously revealed an unusual tripod-like structure of the GPs, forming a local lattice-like arrangement of trimers on the virus surface⁵. Three regions of the GP tripod were termed the head (apex of the tripod; viral membrane-distal), stalk (connects head-floor) and the floor region (membrane-proximal). More recently, it was identified that the head and stalk regions are formed by the first half of the Gc ectodomain by solving the crystal structures of the head domains from the peribunyaviruses BUNV, Oropouche virus (OROV) and LACV, and the head/stalk domains from Schmallenberg virus (SBV)⁶. The membrane-proximal floor region is therefore predicted to contain the remaining half of the Gc ectodomain, which includes the fusion domain, and the entire Gn ectodomain. While there are no published structures of Gn, an AlphaFold model of LACV Gn alone was previously generated⁷, however without a complete structure of Gn-Gc or a higher resolution map the interpretation of this model is limited.

In structures of related bunyavirus Gn-Gc complexes (Phenuiviridae: Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) and Hantaviridae: Tula virus (TULV) and Andes virus (ANDV)) the fusogenic protein Gc adopts a class II fusion fold, and Gn acts as the shielding subunit typically overtopping Gc^8,9. Thus Gn is likely involved in protecting the fusion loops and mediating initial contact with the target cells^10,11. Compared to these orthologous systems, peribunyaviruses possess a relatively small Gn ( ~ half the size; 186 residue ectodomain for BUNV) and a Gc around twice the size (910 residue ectodomain for BUNV) (Fig. 1a)^10,11. This suggests that the functions of these proteins may not be identical across bunyavirus families, which coupled with the scarcity of peribunyavirus structures available has limited our structural understanding.

**Fig. 1: BUNV GPs exhibit a trimeric tripod-like architecture.**

The cues that trigger fusion often result from endosomal maturation, which might involve a gradual drop in intraluminal pH, changes in concentrations of other ions, or alterations to the lipid and protein composition of endosomal membranes¹², dictating when and where fusion occurs. This prevents premature fusion in inappropriate compartments, which would jeopardize virus entry and infection¹³. For bunyaviruses, the events that lead to spike fusogenesis are incompletely characterised and indeed the structural steps in membrane fusion are often inferred from pre-fusion and post-fusion structures, and from what is known for class II fusion proteins of alphaviruses^7,11. Many bunyaviruses require low pH to induce a fusogenic state and, for some, a high H⁺ concentration has been reported to be sufficient to establish post-fusion conformations in vitro and trigger interactions with liposomes^14,15,16. Working with the model peribunyavirus BUNV, and the model nairovirus, Hazara virus (HAZV), we recently showed the current description of bunyavirus entry is over-simplistic. We showed that the concentration of K⁺ ions ([K⁺]) in endosomes, which is controlled by cellular K⁺ channels and increases as endosomes mature¹⁷, peaking in late endosomes, is an important cue for BUNV and HAZV entry. By blocking K⁺ channels pharmacologically, we showed that disruption of endosomal K⁺ accumulation impeded BUNV infection by preventing endosomal release, and instead, viruses were trafficked to lysosomes, where they were degraded^18,19,20. For HAZV, we further showed that elevated K⁺ alone (at pH 7.3) triggered conformational changes in the GP spikes and induced interactions with co-purified vesicles²¹. Additionally, it has recently been shown that disruption of the cellular K⁺ gradient using KCl or the K⁺ ionophore valinomycin inhibits infection by the peribunyaviruses LACV, Keystone virus and Germiston virus; and of the phenuivirus RVFV^22,23, suggesting that K⁺ is broadly required during bunyavirus entry.

Here, we used cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) to unravel the structure of the envelope of BUNV and to identify changes in the virion architecture at endosomal pH and [K⁺]. STA was performed to generate an average of the BUNV GPs that allowed us to fit published atomic models of specific regions of Gc⁶, and modelling both GPs (Gn and Gc) using AlphaFold²⁴ allowed us to generate a full pseudo-atomic model of the BUNV GP envelope. Furthermore, STA of pH 6.3/K⁺ treated virions revealed drastic changes in the GPs, including an uncoupling of Gn-Gc hetero-hexamers. Consistent with these structural data, biochemical assays confirmed that the structural changes elicited by K⁺ are localised to the floor region of the GP spikes. pH 6.3/K⁺ treated viruses also interacted more readily with target membranes, suggesting these conditions prompt exposure of the fusion loops, and when treatment occurs in the presence of a target membrane, it can trigger fusion.

Results

An improved STA of the BUNV GP permits modelling of the Gc and Gn hetero-hexameric arrangement

To determine the arrangement of Gn and Gc in the BUNV spike by cryo-EM, WT BUNV was concentrated and purified as previously described^5,25 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Purified virions (in a pH 7.3/no K⁺ buffer) were then vitrified on cryo-EM grids. Cryo-ET tilt series were collected and 3D tomograms were reconstructed, revealing roughly spherical virions ( ~ 100 nm) in which the lipid bilayer with tripod-like spikes was clearly identifiable surrounding a core of tightly packed ribonucleoproteins (Fig. 1b), as previously described⁵. STA was used to align and average ~20,000 spikes, which confirmed their tripodal arrangement, resolved at ~16 Å (by gold-standard (GS)-FSC Supplementary Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 1). In this average, both leaflets of the viral membrane (‘M’) were clearly defined at the base, with a GP spike projecting ~16 nm from the surface (Fig. 1c, d). Our STA showed distinguishable head, stalk and floor regions (Fig. 1e, f), and a previously unidentified density protruding from the floor but shielded by the tripod head (Fig. 1e white arrowheads). Fitting of the previously determined X-ray structures of the head (BUNV) and stalk (SBV) domains into our model (Fig. 1g, h) revealed a tight fit corresponding to cross-correlation values of 0.70 and 0.82 for the head and stalk domains, respectively. The fit of the head trimer allowed us to confirm the handedness of the average (Supplementary Fig. 2b, c). By exclusion, the floor domain must contain the conserved class II fusion domain of Gc and Gn, however, specific arrangements could not be obtained from this average (Fig. 1g, h and Supplementary Movie 1).

To further our understanding of the architecture of this floor domain, STA was performed focused on the floor region (Fig. 1i, j) and resulted in an average at a slightly improved resolution of ~13 Å, as determined by GS-FSC (Supplementary Fig. 2a). This average is thought to represent a hetero-hexameric assembly of a trimer of Gn and a trimer of the Gc floor region, which includes the fusion domains. In the floor domain, details were identified that were not resolved in the previously published STA⁵, highlighting the interconnected organisation of the fusion domains (Fig. 2a–d). Three stalk domains were also resolved, which identify the connections to three independent tripods. A post-fusion structure of the fusion domain for the related peribunyavirus LACV has been recently solved (pdb: 7A57)²⁶. LACV Gc exhibits a class II fusion domain and shares ~49% amino acid identity and ~69% amino acid similarity with the fusion domain of BUNV Gc. We therefore modelled a LACV pre-fusion domain, based on the differences between the pre-fusion and post-fusion conformations observed for other bunyavirus class II fusion domains, which in broad terms involve the rigid-body rearrangement of domain III (Supplementary Fig. 3)^9,14,27,28. In addition, there was unoccupied density remaining in the floor region that could accommodate a trimer of Gn in the centre, allowing it to contact the Gc fusion domains and the viral membrane (Fig. 2e, f).

**Fig. 2: STA of the floor region allows modelling of the BUNV fusion domain.**

There are currently no Gn structures solved for any peribunyavirus, however, an AlphaFold prediction of a LACV Gn monomer was previously generated⁷. For Gc only partial structures are available: the BUNV head domain, SBV, LACV and OROV stalk domains, and the LACV (post-fusion) fusion domain. In order to interpret the STA map of the BUNV pre-fusion spike, we generated an AlphaFold model of the entire Gn-Gc dimeric complex (Fig. 3a, b)^24,29, which reached an overall high confidence score with an average pLDDT of 85 (predicted local distance difference test, which is a per-residue estimate of its confidence; scores of >70 are expected to be modelled well²⁴) (pLDDT scores and predicted aligned error plot in Supplementary Fig. 4a–c) with all conserved cysteines forming plausible disulphides. Fitting of the ectodomains of Gn and Gc from the AlphaFold model into our STA of the tripod (Fig. 3c, d, cross-correlation 0.72) required only minor adjustments of the angles between head/stalk and floor domains (Supplementary Fig. 4a, d; orange arrows), and it resulted in only minor clashes at protein contact sites within the floor.

**Fig. 3: AlphaFold dimeric structure of BUNV Gn and Gc fits reliably within our GP STA.**

At the time the prediction was made, AlphaFold had not yet been trained on the recently published post-fusion structure of the orthobunyavirus LACV Gc fusion ectodomains (pdb:7A57)²⁶, a circumstance that allowed further validation of the model. Indeed, the individual Gc fusion domains I, II, and III of the model are virtually identical to those of the LACV X-ray structure with RMSD values of 0.867-0.993 Å (pruned atom pairs; Supplementary Fig. 4e), and in the model are arranged in the canonical pre-fusion orientations relative to one another. Similarly, comparison of the AlphaFold model with the published BUNV head and SBV stalk domains revealed RMSD values of 0.419 Å and 1.087 Å respectively. The arrangement of the Gc fusion domain in the floor STA shows that a trimer fits well within this average (Fig. 3e, f; cross-correlation 0.73), and in a highly similar way to that predicted using the LACV structure with the fusion loops pointing upward underneath the tripod (Fig. 2e, f and Supplementary Movie 1).

The Gn AlphaFold model also displays the typical architecture of its orthologs from hantaviruses, phleboviruses, tospoviruses and alphaviruses, which are typically divided into four domains (domains A, B and C and the β-ribbon)⁷. BUNV Gn lacks the canonical domain B, but possesses domains A, C and β-ribbon observed in other bunyavirus Gn proteins⁷, and similarly sits parallel to domain II of the Gc fusion domain, forming numerous stabilising interactions (Fig. 4a–c). The absence of domain B makes orthobunyavirus Gn significantly shorter than its orthologues, but this appears to be compensated by the head and stalk domains on Gc, which are not found in any other bunyaviruses (Fig. 4, compare a, b, c). Our unambiguous fit of three Gn-Gc heterodimer models into the triangular floor of the spike also demonstrates that three protomers of Gn oligomerize at the centre of the floor in a similar fashion as in the tetrameric hantavirus spike⁹ (Fig. 4h).

**Fig. 4: Comparison of GP arrangements of BUNV with that of hantaviruses and phenuiviruses.**

Overall, the AlphaFold prediction confirms the orientation and positions of both Gn and Gc, and allowed us to model the whole orthobunyavirus GP envelope. This arrangement emphasises the role of Gn in stabilising the tripod and the fusion domains in the floor region and demonstrates how the lattice-like local arrangements are formed (Fig. 3g, h and Supplementary Movie 2).

Acidic pH and K⁺ alter the architecture of BUNV virions preventing virion aggregation

We are interested in the structural and functional changes of bunyavirus GPs in response to biochemical cues during entry. In our previous studies, we showed that the pH and K⁺ dependence of virus entry can be recapitulated in vitro (termed acid-treatment), where exposing virions to physiologically relevant endosomal [H⁺] and [K⁺], at 20 mM or higher, led to accelerated onset of infection¹⁹. Here, we aimed to untangle the effects of low pH and K⁺. Of note, when treating viruses in vitro at pH 6.3 prior to infection, the addition of K⁺ resulted in a dramatic increase in the amount of viral N protein (a known marker for viral infection) observed at 18 hpi (during the exponential growth phase), and suggested a distinct role for K⁺ in expediting BUNV entry¹⁹.

In order to characterise the structural effects of pH and K⁺ on BUNV GPs, we treated purified virions as above at both pH 7.3 and pH 6.3, and pH 6.3 with K⁺, prior to vitrification. 2D cryo-EM micrographs of pH 6.3/no K⁺ treated virions versus pH 7.3/no K⁺, showed that the morphology of the virions was altered and ~98% virions were forming clusters (compared to ~4% and ~13% of pH 7.3/no K⁺ and pH 6.3/K⁺ treated virions respectively, Fig. 5a, b; low magnification micrographs in Supplementary Fig. 5a, b), suggestive of direct interactions between virus particles. The electron-dense interior of individual virions can still be distinguished from one another, indicating virion-virion interactions are not fusion events. These interactions may have been driven by exposure of the fusion loops of Gc on one virion contacting neighbouring virions, leading to clustering. Intriguingly, virions at pH 6.3/K⁺ formed no such clusters and appeared as individual virions (Fig. 5c), suggesting that K⁺ prevents the direct interaction of GPs with other viruses. Taken together, these data suggest that K⁺ has a direct effect on virion morphology and GP architecture and function, beyond that elicited by acidic pH.

**Fig. 5: pH 6.3/K⁺ disrupts the BUNV GP spike arrangements on the virion surface.**

Cryo-ET reveals an altered GP arrangement in pH 6.3/K⁺ virions

We next employed cryo-ET to characterise the morphology of virions treated in conditions mimicking early endosomes (pH 6.3/K⁺)³⁰. Compared to pH 7.3/no K⁺ virions (Fig. 1b), pH 6.3/K⁺ virions were noticeably more pleomorphic, with clear disruption of the regular GP arrangement (Fig. 5d, f). Areas of GP-free membrane were also evident on ~48% virions. These data suggested that pH 6.3/K⁺ induced disruption to the locally ordered GP arrangements and allowed GPs to move more freely, revealing spike-free membrane regions.

In our tomograms, both the tripodal structure and local trimeric lattice were easily identifiable on pH 7.3/no K⁺ virions (Fig. 5e). However, pH 6.3/K⁺ virions showed a clear disruption of this arrangement and minimal evidence of tripods (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Fig. 5g), resembling the disruption previously observed in 2D cryo-EM at pH 5.1⁵. Of note, there were no obvious differences in the cores of the virions, suggesting that the effect(s) of pH 6.3/K⁺ were limited to viral GPs. Taken together, these data confirm that treatment at pH 6.3/K⁺ leads to drastic changes in the GP structure of BUNV.

pH 6.3/K⁺ results in GP hetero-hexamer uncoupling, dissociating the tripod and floor domain trimers

We subsequently used STA to determine the GP arrangement from pH 6.3/K⁺ virions. A dramatic change in GP architecture was observed, with the lack of clear tripods and the flexibility of the spikes evident early during processing (Fig. 5d, f, g–j). A short spike-like projection was aligned extending from the membrane ( ~ 10 nm), with a large, flat region of density above the lipid bilayer, which did not form the regular floor domain structure observed in the pH 7.3/no K⁺ condition. The lack of density at the top of the spike was indicative of a highly dynamic unstructured region, suggesting multiple conformations as the density cannot be well refined by STA (Fig. 5f, g). However, two features were apparent from these averages: 1) the lack of organised tripods indicates uncoupling of this region, with the spike potentially corresponding to an extended Gc fusion domain (with or without Gn) or a stalk domain from the pH 7.3/no K⁺ average (Supplementary Fig. 6b–d); 2) a floor region was present in this average, albeit it did not appear to form the ordered trimeric arrangement at the base of the spike comparable to the pH 7.3/no K⁺ (Fig. 5k). Although some of the pH 6.3/K⁺ densities might be visually similar to pH 7.3/no K⁺ floor-like triangular conformations when viewed across a Z plane, the heterogeneity is still evident and any remaining symmetric floor domains are averaged out during processing indicating they are not a highly common occurrence.

In order to obtain further indirect information about the GP arrangement on pH 6.3/K⁺ virions, we performed neutralisation tests with a monoclonal anti-Gc neutralising antibody (mAb-742) which recognises a conformational epitope on the head domain (near glycosylation site N624, which resides on the top of the head (Fig. 1a (asterisk) and h, N624))^31,32. Western blot for BUNV-N of lysates from cells infected with viruses treated at pH 7.3/no K⁺, pH 6.3/no K⁺ or pH 6.3/K⁺, and incubated with mAb-742, showed that this antibody neutralises infection by all treated virions (Supplementary Fig. 7a–d). This confirms that the head-stalk domains are intact and remain attached after pH 6.3/K⁺ treatment, which was unclear from the STA. It is likely that the pH 6.3/K⁺ viruses are still neutralised owing to steric hindrance, impeding the refolding of BUNV GPs or blocking the fusion loops from physically reaching the target membrane.

We additionally confirmed effects of K⁺, beyond that elicited by H⁺, in the floor region utilising a recombinant BUNV lacking the Gc head and ~70% of the stalk domains, which are replaced with eGFP (termed GFP-BUNV; Supplementary Fig. 7e)³³. We previously described that for WT BUNV pre-treatment with pH 6.3/K⁺ resulted in increased levels of BUNV-N at ~18 hpi compared to no treatment, suggesting that pH 6.3/K⁺ expedited BUNV entry. Levels of pH 6.3/K⁺ and pH 7.3/no K⁺ BUNV-N expression, however, normalise by ~24 hpi, during the post-exponential plateau phase¹⁹. Here we confirmed that the GFP-BUNV mutant virus can be triggered by pH 6.3/K⁺ and expedite infection similar to the pH 6.3/K⁺ treated WT BUNV (Supplementary Fig. 7f, g), as previously described for WT¹⁹. Therefore K⁺ must act on the floor region (i.e., Gn and/or the fusion domain of Gc), as this is the only common component between GPs from WT BUNV and GFP-BUNV. This aligns with our observations that pH 6.3/K⁺ treated virions (Fig. 5f–j) lack an ordered arrangement in the GP floor domain. Together with the previous finding that the C-terminal portion of Gc is essential for virus infection³⁴, this indicates that the floor domain of the envelope is the main determinant for virus entry in vitro.

pH 6.3/K⁺ exposes the fusion loops and in the presence of a target membrane can induce fusion

As the GPs are key mediators of multiple stages of viral entry, we modified the in vitro pre-infection acid-treatment assays¹⁹ to assess the effects of K⁺ treatment on GP interactions with host membranes. Virions were in vitro treated at pH 6.3/K⁺ ( + ), pH 6.3/no K⁺ (-) or at pH 7.3/no K⁺ as a control (pH 7), and the acidic buffers were diluted out prior to binding to cells at 4 °C (to block endocytosis). Any weakly bound virions were then removed by washing, and virus binding to host cells was assessed by measuring the amount of N at 24 hpi. For WT BUNV, PBS or trypsin washes efficiently remove surface-bound virions (Supplementary Fig. 8a). In the pH 7 control and pH 6.3/no K⁺ treated viruses, little-to-no BUNV-N was detectable at 24 hpi when virions were washed after binding at 4 °C, indicating that virions treated at these conditions do not bind strongly to the cell surface (Supplementary Fig. 8b, c lanes 1–2, and 8d). In contrast, BUNV-N was detected at similar levels to the unwashed viruses when virions were pre-treated at pH 6.3/K⁺, indicating that these virions bind more strongly to host cell membranes and/or receptors, and are less readily removed by washing (compare Supplementary Fig. 8c, lane 3–4, 5, and 8d). As we showed that pH 6.3/no K⁺ virions form clusters (Fig. 5b), we explored if clusters remain bound to the cell surface after washing. Bound virions (at an MOI of ~10) were fixed post-washing (0 hpi), then immunofluorescently labelled for BUNV-N (Supplementary Fig. 8e). This allowed us to confirm that large virion clusters are still bound, however, are likely unable to infect cells efficiently owing to this clustering.

We hypothesised that pH 6.3/no K⁺ and pH 6.3/K⁺ elicit structural changes that expose the previously shielded Gc fusion loops which facilitate contact with target membranes upon subsequent addition to cells, hence improving cell binding. Therefore, we next investigated whether these conditions are sufficient to induce fusion. For this we tested the ability of un-treated virions to fuse with the plasma membrane under acidic conditions using acid-bypass assays³⁵. Virions were bound to cells at 4 °C, after which pH 6.3/no K⁺, pH 6.3/K⁺ or pH 5.3/no K⁺ acidic buffers were added for a 2 min pulse to induce fusion at the plasma membrane and compared to an untreated control, which should not fuse. Post-bypass, pharmacological inhibitors were added to inactivate any remaining surface-bound virions (TCEP) and prevent endocytic entry (NH₄Cl)^19,20 (Fig. 6a). Finally, infection was assessed at 24 hpi. Under these conditions, any BUNV-N signal should represent successful fusion at the plasma membrane (Fig. 6b, lanes 1-5). Of note, BUNV-N signal was detected for the acid-bypass at both pH 6.3/no K⁺ (lane 3) and pH 6.3/K⁺ (lane 4) that was not present in the untreated control or pH 5.3/no K⁺ conditions, indicating that these virions can bypass endocytosis and fuse at the cell membrane. The pH 6.3/K⁺ BUNV-N fusion band (lane 4) was also the strongest of these conditions, suggesting that although pH 6.3/no K⁺ can induce fusion pH 6.3/K⁺ is more efficient at doing so.

**Fig. 6: pH 6.3/K⁺ induces fusion in the presence of a target membrane.**

This was also compared to infections in the same conditions as above, but without the pharmacological inhibitors, allowing, therefore, viral entry by both fusion at the plasma membrane and by endocytosis. As a result, all corresponding BUNV-N bands are stronger (Fig. 6b, c). The limited N-band in the untreated control (lane 6) is likely owing to the short duration of virus entry during the 2 min pulse, after which non-internalised viruses are removed; and the relative higher intensity of the bands in the adjacent lanes during the western blot exposure.

To confirm that pH 6.3/K⁺ is inducing fusion when a target membrane is present, we incubated purified BUNV virions with artificial membranes, liposomes, at pH 7.3/no K⁺ or pH 6.3/K⁺ (37 °C, 2 hrs) to visualize fusion events by cryo-ET (similar to that previously described for influenza virus fusion³⁰). After pH 7.3/no K⁺ treatment, distinct virions could be seen in close contact with liposomes (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Fig. 9a, b and Supplementary Movie 3), which are identifiable owing to their electron-dense vRNP-containing core (as in Figs. 1b and 5a). After pH 6.3/K⁺ treatment, fusion successfully occurred, as no distinct virions could be identified amongst the liposome clusters (Fig. 6e–h). Additionally, GP spikes could now be identified on liposomal membranes (black arrows) and vRNPs could be located within and surrounding liposomes (white arrows; free-vRNPs are likely due to liposomes breaking, either during the incubation or the freezing processes). This virus-liposome fusion is also exemplified by tomographic segmentation and 3D representation, where vRNPs can be identified within a spike-containing liposome suggesting that a virion(s) had fused with the liposome, releasing its contents within (Fig. 6h and Supplementary Movie 4). This suggests that pH 6.3/K⁺ and a target membrane are sufficient to induce fusion. Of note, 2D cryo-EM projections of pH 6.3/no K⁺ and pH 5.3/no K⁺ conditions also showed no evidence of whole virions reminiscent of the pH 6.3/K⁺ condition, suggesting fusion had occurred (Supplementary Fig. 9a), however as pH 6.3/K⁺ was ~3-fold stronger than without K⁺ at inducing fusion (Fig. 6a–c) this was the condition taken forward to cryo-ET.

Together, these data indicate that K⁺ and pH 6.3 act upon the BUNV GPs to promote conformational changes that increase interactions with membranes without fusion (Fig. 7b), however pH 6.3/K⁺ in the presence of a target membrane can induce fusion (Fig. 7a) and is the most efficient of the conditions tested.

**Fig. 7: Model hypothesising the role of pH 6.3/K⁺ in BUNV fusion events.**

Discussion

We previously demonstrated that for BUNV low pH and K⁺ treatment, and for HAZV neutral pH and K⁺ treatment expedite infection^19,21. However, mechanistic insight was limited owing to the low resolution of the HAZV STA and lack of complete GP structures available for BUNV and HAZV. Here, we utilised BUNV to investigate the mechanistic and structural consequences of endosomal pH and K⁺ during BUNV entry using cryo-ET and STA.

First, we improved the average of the BUNV spike, allowing us to fit structures of the BUNV head and SBV stalk, confirming previous predictions that the fusion domain resides in the floor region (Figs. 1, 2)^5,6. Our improved resolution of the floor region, coupled with an AlphaFold model of the complete BUNV Gn-Gc dimer, allowed us to model the whole viral ectodomain and demonstrates the hetero-hexameric 3x(Gn/Gc) assembly (Fig. 3g, h). Additionally, the fitting of Gc in our subtomogram average shows by exclusion that Gn resides at the centre of the floor domain, connecting the stalks from three tripods, likely stabilising this region. This assembly resembles the organization of the Alphavirus envelope, in which three protomers of the class II fusion protein E1 laterally surround a trimeric core of its chaperone E2³⁶. A similar assembly, with different stoichiometry, is also found in the hetero-octameric 4x(Gn-Gc) complex of the orthohantavirus envelope (Fig. 4e, h)⁹. In contrast to other bunyaviruses however, our model of the BUNV envelope illustrates that the orthobunyavirus Gn cannot completely cover the Gc fusion domain (Fig. 4g). The capping loop found at the tip of BUNV Gn is also shorter than that of hantaviruses, although it still partially shields the fusion loops (Fig. 4a, b). Additionally, a strictly conserved N-linked glycan on the capping loop (residue N60) is likely maintained to allow direct interaction with the fusion loops on Gc, as described for hantaviruses⁹ (Figs. 3a, f and 4a). This BUNV Gn glycan was previously shown to be essential for correct GP folding and successful virus rescue, suggesting an important function in the regulation of the pre/post-fusion switch³². The unique N-terminal half of the larger orthobunyavirus Gc appears to compensate for the small size of its Gn, being well positioned for receptor scavenging and indirectly shielding the fusion machinery (Figs. 3, 4 and Supplementary Movie 1). These head and stalk domains of BUNV Gc are however dispensable for infection in vitro and are not involved in cell fusion or Golgi trafficking, indicating no role in other stages of infection^33,34. Furthermore, our results show that the head and stalk domains are not required for virus triggering by pH 6.3/K⁺, indicating an effect of this condition on the floor region (Supplementary Fig. 7e–g).

With the shielding of the fusion loops, disassembly is required during fusion, similar to the glycoprotein rearrangement required for exposure of the fusion loops of RVFV, HTNV and ANDV^8,9,37,38. As is established for class II fusion proteins¹³, this pre-fusion conformation disassembly is initiated by a biochemical trigger during entry which would elicit structural changes in the GPs to expose the fusion loops, permitting their interaction with endosomal membranes. This is what we observed upon pH 6.3/K⁺ treatment, where pH 6.3/K⁺ triggers the disassembly of the organised hetero-hexameric arrangement, generating an intermediate state that likely involves exposure of the fusion loops to target membranes. This is consistent with the K⁺ effects previously shown for HAZV, where K⁺ treatment triggered large structural changes in the GPs at neutral pH, causing elongation of the GP spikes and their association with co-purified membranes²¹. At a more acidic pH 5.0, loss of the ordered tetrameric arrangement is also observed for TULV (hantavirus) GPs³⁸, and the elongation and membrane interaction of GP spikes of UUKV (phenuivirus)³⁹. However, the requirement of K⁺ for TULV and UUKV entry has not been explored.

For BUNV, if virions are pH 6.3/K⁺ treated when a target membrane is present, fusion can occur, as is shown with the acid-bypass (plasma membrane; Fig. 6b, lane 4) and liposome-virus fusion (Fig. 6e–h) assays. These conditions are therefore sufficient to induce the subsequent structural rearrangements necessary for fusion (Fig. 7a), suggesting that no other host factors are required. In the absence of a target membrane (in vitro pre-treatment), disassembly of the ordered GP arrangement (Fig. 5f–j) establishes a conformation with enhanced binding to the cell post-treatment (Supplementary Fig. 8b, d), however does not lead to an irreversible post-fusion conformation, as these viruses are still fusion-capable and infectious post-treatment. In addition, our previous work determined that endosomal H⁺ and K⁺ are still required post-in vitro-treatment at pH 6.3/K⁺ but to a lesser extent¹⁹, suggesting low pH and K⁺ are required for further structural changes in the fusion process beyond the initial disassembly (Fig. 7b, dotted line).

Interestingly, previous studies on the BUNV GP suggested the occurrence of uncoupling at pH 5.1 in the absence of K⁺⁵, later shown to render BUNV non-infectious¹⁹, therefore likely representing a post-fusion conformation. Fusion events have also been observed at pH 5.3 (no K⁺) using cell-cell fusion assays with BUNV GPs expressed on the surface of BHK cells^34,40. Although in our 2 min acid-bypass assay pH 5.3/no K⁺ did not elicit fusion (Fig. 6a–c), likely due to the short incubation time, the 2 hr liposome fusion assay did suggest that this condition can actually induce fusion (Supplementary Fig. 9a).

We also demonstrated that although pH 6.3/K⁺ was the pre-eminent condition at inducing fusion, pH 6.3/no K⁺ can also induce fusion in acid-bypass and liposome assays, suggesting the H⁺ alone can induce fusion (Fig. 6a–c and Supplementary Fig. 9a). Compared to pH 6.3/K⁺, similar structural changes in BUNV may also be elicited at low pH alone (pH 6.3/no K⁺), which allows interactions with other virions (Fig. 5b). However, the lack of virus-virus interactions in the presence of K⁺ at pH 6.3 suggests that K⁺ limits the effects of pH and prevents full exposure of the fusion domains. Interestingly, a post-fusion X-ray structure of HTNV Gc at pH 6.5 in the presence of KCl coordinates a K⁺ ion within domain II, at tyrosine residue Y105, which then forms different interactions and a more unstable arrangement⁴¹. A similar scenario may be true for the pH 6.3/K⁺ BUNV Gc, in which a K⁺ ion coordination may affect exposure or stability of the fusion loops, thereby preventing virion aggregation as the fusion loops cannot interact with one another. The fact that we cannot resolve a stable conformation of the pH 6.3/K⁺ GP spike is also suggestive of an unstable, flexible conformation (Fig. 5f–j). Of note, for the orthobunyavirus Germiston virus, fusion can be induced at pH 6.0 and the endocytic switch from Na⁺ to K⁺ was also shown to be important for entry²³. Although the effects of pH 6.0 with K⁺ on Germiston virus fusion were not investigated, this represents an interesting comparison and suggests a shared mechanism.

In summary, we have determined the molecular arrangement of the Gc fusion domain and Gn within the floor domain of the BUNV spike, and additionally resolved drastic structural changes in the GP architecture in response to pH 6.3/K⁺, which in the presence of a target membrane can induce fusion. The ability of pharmacological K⁺ channel inhibitors to disrupt infection by a number of bunyaviruses from different families^18,21,22,42, alongside the structural changes elicited by K⁺ on both BUNV and HAZV, which is potentially shared by other bunyaviruses, suggests a shared mechanism that could be exploited therapeutically.

Methods

Cells and viruses

A549 (human alveolar carcinoma epithelial; 86012804), SW13 (human adrenal cortex carcinoma; 87031801) and BHK-21 (baby hamster kidney; 85011433) cells were obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC). Cell lines were authenticated by ECACC and were routinely tested for mycoplasma. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Sigma) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and maintained in a humidified incubator at 37 °C, with 5% CO₂. Wild-type BUNV stocks (provided by Professor Richard Elliott, Glasgow Centre for Virus Research (CVR)) were generated from infected cell supernatants and titre estimated by plaque assay^18,19. For infection assays, A549 cells were infected at an MOI = 0.1 unless otherwise specified. GFP-BUNV stocks were provided by Dr Xiaohong Shi (Glasgow CVR) and encoded an eGFP tag replacing residues 478-827 of the BUNV M segment (the Gc head and stalk regions)³³. Wild-type human respiratory syncytial virus A2 strain (HRSV) was obtained from the National Collection of Pathogenic Viruses (NCPV; Public Health England)⁴³.

Virus purification

BHK-21 cells were seeded into T175 flasks and infected with BUNV for 3 hr in FBS-free DMEM (MOI of 0.1). Media was replaced with 2% FBS DMEM and incubated until 44 hpi at 32 °C. Virus-containing supernatants were clarified by centrifugation and filtration (0.22 µm filter), and then virions were pelleted by ultracentrifugation (150,000 x g, 3 hr, 4 °C) through a 30% sucrose cushion²⁵. Virions were resuspended in 0.1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 0.1x to dilute the salts) by gentle rocking at 4 °C overnight. BUNV titres were determined by plaque assay, and purity was determined by silver staining and negative stain EM.

Plaque assays

Plaque assays were performed in SW13 cells as previously described¹⁹. Viral stocks were serially diluted from 10⁻¹ to 10⁻⁶, and SW13 cells were infected for 1 hr at 37 °C. Infected cells were overlayed with 1.6% carboxy-methyl cellulose diluted equally in complete DMEM. After 6 days the overlay was removed, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 mins at 4 °C, stained with 1% crystal violet and the number of plaques counted to estimate viral titre.

Silver staining

During the BUNV purification 10 µl samples were collected of the pre-ultracentrifugation viral supernatant (snt), the post-ultracentrifugation snt, snt-sucrose interface, and sucrose. Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE alongside 0.5 µl of purified BUNV and 1:100 diluted protein ladder, then fixed and stained following the silver staining kit (GE Healthcare) manufacturer’s instructions.

Western blot

At the indicated time points cells were lysed (25 mM glycerol phosphate, 20 mM tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 50 mM NaF, 5 mM Na₄O₇P₂, pH 7.4), and western blotting was performed^19,43. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF; Millipore) membranes. After blocking in 10% (w/v) milk in TBS-T, the appropriate primary antibodies were added at 4 °C overnight: sheep α-BUNV-N (1:5000) produced by J N Barr, University of Leeds (antibody-containing serum was obtained from a sheep inoculated with BUNV-N protein previously expressed in E. coli and purified by affinity and size-exclusion chromatography detailed in Ariza et al. (2013)⁴⁴; and used extensively in previous publications¹⁸); goat α-HRSV (1:1000; Abcam ab20745); mouse α-GAPDH (1:2000, Santa Cruz sc47724); or mouse α-GFP (1:1000; Santa Cruz sc-9996). This was followed by the corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Merck α-sheep A3415; α-goat A8919; α-mouse A4416) for 1 hr. Labelling was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (Advansta) and a G:Box processor. Densitometry was performed using ImageJ, showing standard deviation error bars and statistical significance determined using a one-way ANOVA where P < 0.05. Full uncropped blots and densitometry data can be found in the Source Data file.

Immunofluorescence staining

After the indicated infection times, cells were washed with PBS and then fixed for 15 mins at 4 °C with 4% paraformaldehyde. Fixed cells were permeabilised with 50% methanol/acetone, blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin (in PBS) for 30 mins and labelled using α-BUNV-N primary antibodies (1:5000) for 1 hr, followed by α-sheep Alexa-fluor-594 or -488 fluorescent secondary antibodies added 1:500 for 1 hr (Thermo Scientific A11016 and A11015 respectively). As specified, fluorescence was imaged using the IncuCyte ZOOM imaging system, or coverslips were mounted onto glass slides (ProLong Gold Anti-Fade reagent; Invitrogen) and imaged using a Zeiss Confocal LSM880 upright microscope (40x magnification).

In vitro acid pre-treatment assays

BUNV acid pre-treatment assays were previously optimised, including assessment of a range of time points, ionic buffers and physiological KCl concentrations¹⁹. Therefore, these in vitro treatment assays are from established protocols and were performed as previously described. Any adaptations are highlighted. BUNV was incubated pre-infection at 37 °C for 2 hrs in a range of buffers: pH 7.3 (20 mM tris), pH 6.3 (30 mM bis-tris) or pH 5.3 (50 mM sodium citrate) supplemented with 10 mM NaCl (to maintain osmolarity), with or without 140 mM KCl (‘K⁺’ vs ‘no K⁺’). Buffer was diluted out with DMEM prior to infection of A549 cells at a MOI of 0.1 for the indicated times (hpi), after which cells were lysed and BUNV infection assessed by western blot. Cell lysis at 18 hpi represents the exponential phase of BUNV infection (where pH 6.3/K⁺ expedited entry at BUNV-N expression begins earlier than WT and there is therefore more N) and 24 hpi during the plateau post-exponential phase (pH 6.3/K⁺ treated virions and WT BUNV-N expression is equal)¹⁹. For the GFP-BUNV, virus was treated with buffers as with WT BUNV, and infection was assessed at 18 hpi.

For the cell binding assays, after the pre-infection in vitro treatment (pH 6.3/no K⁺, pH 6.3/K⁺, or a pH 7.3 control), buffers were diluted out with cold DMEM and virions added to cells at 4 °C for 1.5 hrs; to allow binding but prevent internalisation¹⁹. Cells were washed 3x 30 secs with 0.1x PBS or left unwashed, and infection was allowed to proceed until 24 hpi (see Supplementary Fig. 8b). Infection was assessed by western blot of cells lysed at 24 hpi. In the immunofluorescence binding test, purified virions were in vitro treated (pH 7.3/no K⁺ or pH 6.3/K⁺), bound to cells at 4 °C for 1.5 hrs, and then washed as above. Cells were fixed (0 hpi) and immunofluorescently stained for BUNV-N. Purified BUNV of a high titre ( ~ 1 × 10⁹ PFU/ml) was used in order to bind viral particles an MOI of ~10 to the cells, to improve virion detection by this method. Images were taken by confocal microscopy. In the initial wash test assay (Supplementary Fig. 8a), A549 cells were infected at 4 °C with BUNV (MOI = 0.1) and left unwashed or washed 3x 30 seconds with 0.1x PBS or 0.1% trypsin. Infection was assessed at 24 hpi by western blot.

For the neutralisation assays, BUNV was treated at pH 7.3/no K⁺ (control), pH 6.3/no K⁺ or pH 6.3/K⁺ as above, then buffer was diluted and virions were neutralised with mAb-742 anti-BUNV-Gc monoclonal antibody (1:10,000; produced in the Professor Richard Elliott laboratory, CVR, University of Glasgow and provided by Dr Xiaohong Shi³¹) or a dH₂O control for 1 hr with gentle rocking. A549 cells were then infected at an MOI 0.1 for 18 hrs, at which point cells were fixed for immunofluorescence or lysed for western blot. Fixed cells were immunofluorescently stained for BUNV-N and images taken using an IncuCyte ZOOM as previously utilised^19,43. HRSV control experiments were performed as with WT BUNV, however infections were performed at an MOI = 1 for 24 hrs, and analysed by western blot.

Acid-bypass assay

To induce fusion at the plasma membrane, and thus bypass endosomal entry (see Fig. 6a), a protocol was adapted from the procedure previously outlined by Stauffer et al. (2014)³⁵. BUNV (MOI 0.1) was bound to A549 cells by addition at 4 °C for 1 hr, and unbound virus was then removed with the media. Virions bound to the cell membrane were subjected to acidic buffers (‘acid-bypass’) by adding warm fusion buffers to cells for a 2 min pulse at 37 °C: pH 6.3/no K⁺, pH 6.3/K⁺, pH 5.3/no K⁺, or a DMEM-added infection control (Inf. ctl) (instead of the 2 hrs used for acid pre-treatments). The fusion buffers used were the same as those used for the acid-treatments in the above experiments, but additionally containing 0.1x PBS to maintain cell osmolarity. Conditions were performed in duplicate and to one of each buffer condition, fusion buffers were gently removed and replaced with DMEM (no harsh washing steps to avoid removing weakly bound virions). Thus, endocytic entry, as well as plasma membrane fusion, will proceed (labelled: endocytosed+fused). To the duplicate well for each fusion buffer condition, cells were subsequently washed with cold DMEM and treated with or without drugs to prevent endocytic entry: the reducing agent tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP; 10 mM, Sigma) was added to cells for the + drugs wells for 5 mins at 37 °C to inactivate surface-bound virions²⁰, which was then removed and replaced with an acid-bypass stop buffer (DMEM containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.3), and 20 mM ammonium chloride (NH₄Cl); Sigma) to prevent endosomal acidification and hence entry by endocytosis¹⁹. As such, only virions that bypass the endocytic network and fuse at the plasma membrane would result in a productive infection^19,20 (labelled: fused at p.m. (drugs)). Cells were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hrs, then lysed and infection assessed by western blot.

Liposome preparation

Liposomes consisting of phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylcholine, and rhodamine-labelled phosphatidylethanolamine (ratio 10:10:1) with 10% cholesterol were purified as previously described⁴⁵. Briefly, lipids in chloroform were dried in a film with argon and rehydrated in 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM Hepes pH 7.5. The rehydrated lipids were initially extruded through a mini-extruder (Avanti Polar Lipids) using a 400 nm pore-size membrane (Whatman) and further extruded using a 100 nm pore-size membrane (Whatman). Liposomes were pelleted by ultracentrifugation at 140,100 xg (20 °C) for 20 minutes using a SW55 rotor. A comparison of the rhodamine fluorescence in the liposome preparation and samples of rehydrated lipids with known lipid concentrations was used to estimate the lipid concentration of the liposomes.

Electron microscopy

Negative stain EM was used to assess the purification of BUNV prior to cryo-EM²¹. Briefly, purified BUNV was loaded onto glow-discharged carbon-coated grids and allowed to stand for 30 secs. Grids were washed three times with dH₂O and stained with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate for 10 secs. Images were collected on a FEI Tecnai T12 electron microscope at 120 kV, using a Gatan Ultrascan 4000 charge-coupled device camera and operated between -1 µm and -5 µm nominal defocus.

For cryo-EM and cryo-ET, 2 µl purified BUNV virions ( ~ 6.8 x 10⁶ particles) were diluted in 2 µl (1:1) of a range of acidic buffers (components outlined in ‘acid pre-treatment’ section above, however, adjusted to equate the same final concentrations: pH 7.3/no K⁺, pH 6.3/no K⁺, pH 6.3/K⁺; final concentration 127.5 mM KCl) for 2 hr at 37 °C matching the acid-treatment experiments used previously¹⁹. Virions were then mixed with 2 µl of Protein A conjugated with 10-nm colloidal gold (Aurion) as a fiducial marker for tomogram alignment, and 3 µl of the mixture was immediately loaded onto glow-discharged lacey-carbon EM grids, with an ultra-thin 2 nm carbon support film (Agar scientific). Grids were blotted for 3 secs and vitrified using a Leica EM GP automatic plunge freezer. Cryo-EM micrographs were collected for each condition on an FEI Titan Krios using a Falcon E3C direct electron detector, operated at 300 KeV and at −0.5 to −3.5 µm defocus.

For the liposome fusion assay, 2 µl purified BUNV ( ~ 2.25 × 10⁶ particles) were combined with 1 µl liposomes and 3 µl buffer (buffer pH 7.3/no K⁺, pH 6.3/no K⁺, pH 6.3 or pH 5.3/no K⁺ as for cryo-EM of virions) for 2 hr at 37 °C, conditions known to elicit changes in the BUNV GPs. Samples were then cooled at 4 °C until 3 µl colloidal gold was added and immediately vitrified on cryo-EM grids, as above. Cryo-EM grid screening micrographs were collected as above.

Cryo-ET and image processing

Grids for cryo-ET were prepared as described above and tilt series were collected using a FEI Titan Krios using an energy-filtered (20 eV slit) Gatan K2 XP summit direct electron detector in counting mode (300 KeV), and a Volta phase plate. Tomography 4 (FEI) and EPU v2.8.1 software were used to collect single-axis tilt series from −60° to +60°, at 2° increments. A defocus of -1 µm was used, at x53,000 magnification, corresponding to a pixel size of 2.72 Å, and an electron dose of ~1.8 e⁻ per image (total dose per tilt series ~108 e^-/Å²). Tilt-series projections were pre-processed by motion correction using Relion 3.0, and contrast transfer function (CTF) calculated using Relion 3.0 (gctf) and then corrected using CTF phase-flip^46,47. The IMOD package eTOMO was used to align the projections using the gold fiducials and calculate the 3D reconstructions by weighted back projection⁴⁸, with a final pixel size of 5.44 Å after binning by a factor of two. For STA, unbinned tomograms (2.72 Å pixel size) were also generated using only the −30˚ to +30˚ tilt angles (to improve the signal-to-noise of the resulting tomograms). Representative images were Gaussian Blur 3D filtered using ImageJ.

Cryo-ET tilt series were collected for the liposome-virus fusion assays for the pH 7.3/no K⁺ and pH 6.3/K⁺ conditions, using similar parameters to those above (−60˚ to +60˚, at 2˚ increments) on a FEI Titan Krios with a Falcon 4i detector in counting mode (300 KeV). TOMO software was used to set up data collections, and a dose of ~2.4 e⁻ per image was used (total dose 148 e⁻/Å²). Projections were motion corrected as above and 3D reconstructions also generated using eTOMO (IMOD). Tomograms were binned by a factor of 4, yielding a final pixel size of 9.6 Å, and representative images ( > 6 tomograms per condition) were Gaussian blur filtered in ImageJ. Segmentation of representative tomograms was performed using AmiraEM software (Thermo Scientific).

Subtomogram averaging

PEET (IMOD package) was used for STA⁴⁹ and Bsoft for basic image processing⁵⁰. Briefly, for both conditions ~200 tripodal spikes were initially selected and the spikeInit programme used to calculate initial orientations perpendicular to the viral membrane. These initial orientations were employed to generate an initial ‘tripod’ reference used for subsequent particle selection.

For the pH 7.3/no K⁺ tripod STA, the seedSpikes and spikeInit programmes were used to automatically estimate all spike positions and orientations on the viral membranes (71 virions used, ~9000 subtomograms), which were then iteratively refined following PEET guidelines using the previously generated initial reference. A summary of the processing stages and EM maps obtained can be found in Supplementary Table 1. Duplicate particles were removed at each stage, and a spherical mask around the tripod was used to focus alignments. After the initial refinements C3 symmetry was evident, therefore in later stages pseudo-particles representing the 3 possible orientations of each tripod were calculated, thereby tripling the number of subtomograms. Additionally, re-creating unbinned tomograms using -30˚ to +30˚ tilt angles, to remove the projections from high tilt angles, improved the resolution achievable in STA. For the whole tripod, this resulted in 20,282 subtomograms with a calculated FSC resolution of ~9.1 Å, using the calcFSC PEET programme and a 0.5 cutoff. The subtomogram average of the floor region was generated as above, but by re-centring the average on this region instead of the tripod (using the modifyMotiveList programme to translate the position of the original spikes before tripod refinement) and then iteratively refining the locations and orientations of the subtomograms. This similarly resulted in 16,096 subtomograms, but an improved resolution of ~6.6 Å (0.5 FSC cutoff) of this region using the full dataset.

For accurate structural determination and resolution calculations GS-FSC was also performed on half split datasets. For GS-FSC resolution estimation, all automatically selected particles were passed through an initial iteration to remove duplicate particles. The remaining particles were split into half datasets and independently aligned and averaged following identical steps to that outlined above. The half datasets were then aligned to bring the two averages into a common position and orientation, following PEET guidelines. The FSC between the two half maps was computed using the calcUnbiasedFSC programme (PEET), the result of which was used to filter the resolution of the full dataset. This resulted in an unbiased FSC calculation (using a 0.143 cutoff) for the tripod was ~16 Å and ~13 Å for the floor STA.

For the pH 6.3/K⁺ treated virus STA, automatic selection of spikes using seedSpikes, did not result in a coherent average. Subtomograms were therefore manually selected ( ~ 20,000) from 89 virions and alignment was refined iteratively using the initial reference, obtained as for the control. No symmetry was evident and therefore was not applied (Supplementary Table 1). Additionally, the density at the top of the spikes could not be well refined suggesting multiple conformations. To address this, principal components analysis (pca) and clusterPca programmes were used to identify clusters of separate conformations. Three clusters were identified however the top of the spikes remained unresolved for all (this was also the case for all the clustering options explored) and therefore suggested a highly dynamic structure. The largest cluster (9,987 subtomograms) was taken forward for further refinements utilising a loosely fitted mask to improve the more structured regions and resulted in ~16 Å resolution. This was determined using the calcFSC (0.5 cutoff) PEET programme (not GS-FSC), owing to the high flexibility and low resolution of the average.

Subtomograms were visualised using Chimera and ChimeraX^51,52. Fitting of the BUNV head domain (pdb: 6H3V), SBV stalk (pdb: 6H3S)⁶ and the LACV fusion domains (pre-fusion modelled from pdb: 7A57) was also performed in ChimeraX; using fitmap, which provides cross-correlation scores. Comparison of the RMSD values between the individual domain structures of the BUNV, SBV & LACV Gc with the AlphaFold Gc was obtained using the matchmaker command in ChimeraX. RMSD values (Å) for the pruned atom pairs are shown (Supplementary Fig. 4e).

A local install of AlphaFold_Multimer v2.1.0 (as described at https://github.com/deepmind/alphafold) was used to generate the multimer structure of the BUNV Gn/Gc complex, using the M segment sequences for Gn and Gc from uniprot: P04505 (Gn residues 17-302, Gc residues 478−1433)^24,29. At the time of model generation, only the Gc head and stalk domains were available for orthobunyaviruses; no Gc fusion domain nor Gn structures were available for training the model. For fitting into the tripod STA, the output model was rotated (ChimeraX and Coot) using rigid-body fitting about the flexible inter-domain region (which also had low model confidence) between the stalk and fusion domains I (see Supplementary Fig. 4a, d).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The cryo-ET STA averages have been deposited in EMBD under accession codes EMD-15557 (STA of the pH 7.3/no K⁺ BUNV tripod in Fig. 1); EMD-15569 (STA of the floor region in Fig. 2); and EMD-15579 (STA of the pH 6.3/K⁺ GPs in Fig. 5). The AlphaFold model (Fig. 3), lacking the TMDs (which are not supported by the STA data) can be found in Supplementary Data 1. The previously published X-ray crystal structures can be obtained from PDB using accession codes 6H3V [https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb6H3V/pdb] (BUNV Gc head domain); 6H3S [https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb6H3S/pdb] (SBV Gc head/stalk domains); and 7A57 [https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb7A57/pdb] (LACV Gc fusion domains in the post-fusion conformation). The source data underlying Fig. 6b, c; and Supplementary Figs. 4a, 6a, 7b–d, 7f, g and 8a–c are provided as a Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Briese, T., Calisher, C. H. & Higgs, S. Viruses of the family Bunyaviridae: are all available isolates reassortants? Virology 446, 207–216 (2013).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Elliott, R. M. Emerging viruses: the Bunyaviridae. Mol. Med. 3, 572–577 (1997).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Abudurexiti, A. et al. Taxonomy of the order Bunyavirales: update 2019. Arch Virol. 164, 1–17 (2019).
Elliott, R. M. Orthobunyaviruses: Recent genetic and structural insights. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 673–685 (2014).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bowden, T. A. et al. Orthobunyavirus ultrastructure and the curious tripodal glycoprotein spike. PLOS Pathog. 9, e1003374 (2013).
Hellert, J. et al. Orthobunyavirus spike architecture and recognition by neutralizing antibodies. Nat. Commun. 10, 879 (2019).
Guardado-Calvo, P. & Rey, F. A. The viral class II membrane fusion machinery: divergent evolution from an ancestral heterodimer. Viruses 13, 2368 (2021).
Halldorsson, S. et al. Shielding and activation of a viral membrane fusion protein. Nat. Commun. 9, 349 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Serris, A. et al. The hantavirus surface glycoprotein lattice and its fusion control mechanism. Cell 183, 442–456 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guardado-Calvo, P. & Rey, F. A. The Envelope Proteins of the Bunyavirales. Adv. Virus Res. 98, 83–118 (2017).
Hulswit R. J. G., Paesen G. C., Bowden T. A., Shi X. Recent advances in bunyavirus glycoprotein research: Precursor processing, receptor binding and structure. Viruses 13, 353 (2021).
Huotari, J. & Helenius, A. Endosome maturation. EMBO J. 30, 3481–3500 (2011).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Harrison, S. C. Viral membrane fusion. Virology 479–480, 498–507 (2015).
PubMed Google Scholar
Halldorsson, S. et al. Structure of a phleboviral envelope glycoprotein reveals a consolidated model of membrane fusion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7154–7159 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Acuña, R., Bignon, E. A., Mancini, R., Lozach, P.-Y. & Tischler, N. D. Acidification triggers Andes hantavirus membrane fusion and rearrangement of Gc into a stable post-fusion homotrimer. J. Gen. Virol. 96, 3192–3197 (2015).
PubMed Google Scholar
de Boer, S. M. et al. Acid-activated structural reorganization of the rift valley fever virus gc fusion protein. J. Virol. 86, 13642–13652 (2012).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Scott, C. C. C. & Gruenberg, J. Ion flux and the function of endosomes and lysosomes: pH is just the start. Bioessays 33, 103–110 (2011).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hover, S. et al. Modulation of potassium channels inhibits bunyavirus infection. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 3411–3422 (2016).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hover, S. et al. Bunyavirus requirement for endosomal K⁺ reveals new roles of cellular ion channels during infection. PLOS Pathog. 14, e1006845 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Charlton, F. W. et al. Cellular cholesterol abundance regulates potassium accumulation within endosomes and is an important determinant in bunyavirus entry. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 7335–7347 (2019).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Punch, E. K. et al. Potassium is a trigger for conformational change in the fusion spike of an enveloped RNA virus. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 9937–9944 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sandler Z. J. et al. Novel ionophores active against La Crosse virus identified through rapid antiviral screening. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 64, e00086–20 (2020).
Windhaber, S. et al. The orthobunyavirus Germiston enters host cells from late endosomes. J. Virol. 96, e0214621 (2022).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Hopkins F. R. et al. The native orthobunyavirus ribonucleoprotein possesses a helical architecture. mBio. 13, e0140522 (2022).
Hellert, J. et al. Structure, function, and evolution of the Orthobunyavirus membrane fusion glycoprotein. Cell Rep. 42, 112142 (2023).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dessau, M. & Modis, Y. Crystal structure of glycoprotein C from Rift Valley fever virus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1696–1701 (2013).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Guardado-Calvo, P. et al. A glycerophospholipid-specific pocket in the RVFV class II fusion protein drives target membrane insertion. Science 358, 663–667 (2017).
CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at bioRxiv.2021.10.04.463034v2.
Lee, K. K. Architecture of a nascent viral fusion pore. EMBO J. 29, 1299–1311 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lappin, D. F., Nakitare, G. W., Palfreyman, J. W. & Elliott, R. M. Localization of Bunyamwera bunyavirus G1 glycoprotein to the Golgi requires association with G2 but not with NSm. J. Virol. 75, 3441–3451 (1994).
CAS Google Scholar
Shi, X., Brauburger, K. & Elliott, R. M. Role of N-linked glycans on bunyamwera virus glycoproteins in intracellular trafficking, protein folding, and virus infectivity. J. Virol. 79, 13725–13734 (2005).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shi, X., van Mierlo, J. T., French, A. & Elliott, R. M. Visualizing the replication cycle of Bunyamwera orthobunyavirus expressing fluorescent protein-tagged Gc glycoprotein. J. Virol. 84, 8460–8469 (2010).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shi, X., Goli, J., Clark, G., Brauburger, K. & Elliott, R. M. Functional analysis of the Bunyamwera orthobunyavirus Gc glycoprotein. J. Gen. Virol. 90, 2483–2492 (2009).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stauffer, S. et al. Stepwise priming by acidic pH and a high K⁺ concentration is required for efficient uncoating of influenza A virus cores after penetration. J. Virol. 88, 13029–13046 (2014).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Voss, J. E. et al. Glycoprotein organization of Chikungunya virus particles revealed by X-ray crystallography. Nature 468, 709–712 (2010).
CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Bignon, E. A., Albornoz, A., Guardado-Calvo, P., Rey, F. A. & Tischler, N. D. Molecular organization and dynamics of the fusion protein Gc at the hantavirus surface. Elife 8, e46028 (2019).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rissanen, I. et al. Structural transitions of the conserved and metastable hantaviral glycoprotein envelope. J. Virol. 91, 378–417 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bitto, D., Halldorsson, S., Caputo, A. & Huiskonen, J. T. Low pH and anionic lipid-dependent fusion of Uukuniemi phlebovirus to liposomes. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 6412–6422 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shi, X., Kohl, A., Li, P. & Elliott, R. M. Role of the cytoplasmic tail domains of Bunyamwera orthobunyavirus glycoproteins Gn and Gc in virus assembly and morphogenesis. J. Virol. 81, 10151–10160 (2007).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Guardado-Calvo, P. et al. Mechanistic insight into bunyavirus-induced membrane fusion from structure-function analyses of the hantavirus envelope glycoprotein Gc. PLOS Pathog. 12, e1005813 (2016).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sabella, E. et al. Effects of modulation of potassium channels in tobacco mosaic virus elimination. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 102, 180–184 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
Pearson, H. et al. TMEM16A/ANO1 calcium-activated chloride channel as a novel target for the treatment of human respiratory syncytial virus infection. Thorax 76, 64–72 (2021).
PubMed Google Scholar
Ariza, A. et al. Nucleocapsid protein structures from orthobunyaviruses reveal insight into ribonucleoprotein architecture and RNA polymerization. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 5912–26 (2013).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Panjwani A., et al. Capsid protein VP4 of human rhinovirus induces membrane permeability by the formation of a size-selective multimeric pore. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004294 (2014).
Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Xiong, Q., Morphew, M. K., Schwartz, C. L., Hoenger, A. H. & Mastronarde, D. N. CTF determination and correction for low dose tomographic tilt series. J. Struct. Biol. 168, 378–387 (2009).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. N. & Held, S. R. Automated tilt series alignment and tomographic reconstruction in IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 102–113 (2017).
PubMed Google Scholar
Nicastro, D. et al. The molecular architecture of axonemes revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 313, 944–948 (2006).
CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Heymann, J. B. & Belnap, D. M. Bsoft: image processing and molecular modeling for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 3–18 (2007).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chao, L. H., Klein, D. E., Schmidt, A. G., Peña, J. M. & Harrison, S. C. Sequential conformational rearrangements in flavivirus membrane fusion. Elife 3, e04389 (2014).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Astbury Biostructure Laboratory electron microscopy facility and the bioimaging facility for support in using the microscopes, and a particular thanks to Dr. Emma Hesketh, Dr. Rebecca Thompson, Dr. Yehuda Halfon and Dr. Louie Aspinall (University of Leeds) for the cryo-electron tomography data collection setups. Thanks to Professor Félix Rey (Institut Pasteur, Paris) for kindly providing the structure of the LACV post-fusion Gc prior to publication and for useful comments on the manuscript. Thanks also to Dr Xiaohong Shi, Professor Richard Elliott and Professor Alain Kohl from the Glasgow Centre for Virus Research (CVR, University of Glasgow), and Dr Cheryl Walter (University of Hull) for providing reagents. Finally, thanks to Dr. Samuel Haysom, Dr. Katherine Fenn and Jonathan Machin for their help with AlphaFold. J.F. was funded by the University of Leeds (University Academic Fellow scheme). This work was funded by the Human Frontiers Science Program (RGP0040/2019) awarded to J.F., the Academy of Medical Sciences and the Wellcome Trust (Springboard Award, SBF002\1029) awarded to J.F., the Rosetrees Trust (A1618) awarded to J.F., and the MRC (MR/T016159/1) awarded to J.M., J.N.B. and J.F. Electron Microscopy was performed at the Astbury Biostructure Laboratory (University of Leeds), which was funded by the University of Leeds and the Wellcome Trust (108466/Z/15/Z, 090932/Z/09/Z, 221524/Z/20/Z). The IncuCyte ZOOM live imaging system was funded by the BBSRC (BB/P001459/1), and awarded to Professor Nicola Stonehouse (University of Leeds). The Zeiss LSM 880 upright Confocal microscope was funded by the Wellcome Trust (WT104918MA) and awarded to the University of Leeds BioImaging facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Leeds, United Kingdom
Samantha Hover, Frank W. Charlton, Jessica J. Swanson, Jamel Mankouri, John N. Barr & Juan Fontana
Astbury Centre for Structural and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, United Kingdom
Samantha Hover, Frank W. Charlton, Jessica J. Swanson, Jamel Mankouri, John N. Barr & Juan Fontana
Centre for Structural Systems Biology, Leibniz-Institut für Virologie (LIV), Notkestraße 85, 22607, Hamburg, Germany
Jan Hellert

Authors

Samantha Hover
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Frank W. Charlton
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jan Hellert
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jessica J. Swanson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jamel Mankouri
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
John N. Barr
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Juan Fontana
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Experimental work performed by S.H.; grid preparation by S.H. and J.F.; liposome preparation by J.J.S.; computational analysis by S.H., J.F., F.W.C., and J.H.; experimental design by S.H., J.F., J.M., and J.N.B.; manuscript preparation by S.H., J.F., J.M., and J.N.B., with input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jamel Mankouri, John N. Barr or Juan Fontana.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Nicole Tischler and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Supplementary Movie 3

Supplementary Movie 4

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hover, S., Charlton, F.W., Hellert, J. et al. Organisation of the orthobunyavirus tripodal spike and the structural changes induced by low pH and K⁺ during entry. Nat Commun 14, 5885 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41205-w

Download citation

Received: 16 September 2022
Accepted: 26 August 2023
Published: 21 September 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41205-w

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.