Abstract
HIV-1 capsid (CA) stability is important for viral replication. E45A and P38A mutations enhance and reduce core stability, thus impairing infectivity. Second-site mutations R132T and T216I rescue infectivity. Capsid lattice stability was studied by solving seven crystal structures (in native background), including P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, E45A/R132T CA, using molecular dynamics simulations of lattices, cryo-electron microscopy of assemblies, time-resolved imaging of uncoating, biophysical and biochemical characterization of assembly and stability. We report pronounced and subtle, short- and long-range rearrangements: (1) A38 destabilized hexamers by loosening interactions between flanking CA protomers in P38A but not P38A/T216I structures. (2) Two E45A structures showed unexpected stabilizing CANTD-CANTD inter-hexamer interactions, variable R18-ring pore sizes, and flipped N-terminal β-hairpin. (3) Altered conformations of E45Aa α9-helices compared to WT, E45A/R132T, WTPF74, WTNup153, and WTCPSF6 decreased PF74, CPSF6, and Nup153 binding, and was reversed in E45A/R132T. (4) An environmentally sensitive electrostatic repulsion between E45 and D51 affected lattice stability, flexibility, ion and water permeabilities, electrostatics, and recognition of host factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
During maturation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), capsid proteins (CA) assemble into a conical core (or capsid) surrounding the viral genome. Formation of a core with optimal stability is a strict requirement for efficient HIV-1 infection1,2,3. Following delivery into the cytoplasm, the HIV-1 core undergoes controlled disassembly (uncoating), which appears to be coordinated with productive reverse transcription and concealing the DNA product from immune surveillance of the target cell4,5.
The structure of CA and its effects on core stability are critical for uncoating, reverse transcription, nuclear entry, integration site selection, and assembly2,3,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. CA folds into two distinct domains connected by a linker: the N-terminal domain (CANTD), composed of seven α-helices and a single β-hairpin, and the C-terminal domain (CACTD), composed of a 310-helix and four α-helices6,7,8,13,14. Purified HIV-1 CA can spontaneously assemble in vitro into tubes and cones that recapitulate the CA-CA interactions of authentic viral capsids2,15,16,17. The cores comprise ~250 CA hexamers and 12 CA pentamers2,15,16,17. A hexagonal lattice is the foundation of the mature capsid. It is stabilized by intra-hexamer (CANTD-CANTD and CANTD-CACTD contacts between six adjacent CAs in a hexamer), inter-hexamer (2-fold and 3-fold CACTD-CACTD interactions between two or three adjacent CA hexamers, respectively), as well as intra-protomer (CANTD-CACTD contacts in the CA monomer) interfaces6,7,8,13,14,17,18,19. To our knowledge, so far, there have been no reports of CANTD-CANTD inter-hexamer interactions. It was previously shown that inositol hexaphosphate (IP6), stabilizes hexamers and promotes DNA synthesis, by binding at the six-fold symmetry axis of a CA hexamer, at a pocket composed of six R18 residues from each of the six CA monomers20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30.
Extensive research efforts have been invested over many years to determine the effect of residue changes on the structure and function of CA1,2,3,31,32. Among them, P38A and E45A did not cause obvious defects in assembly, maturation or the packaging of viral proteins, yet significantly reduced infectivity3. The infectivity reduction has been linked to altered core stability: P38A mutation destabilized viral cores, whereas E45A resulted in hyperstable cores1. Moreover, E45A decreased susceptibility to PF7433,34,35 and resistance to the restriction effects of CPSF6-35836,37 and TRIM-Nup15337,38. Resistance to PF74 is reversed in E45A/R132T33,34,35. Structures of cross-linkable HIV-1 CA complexes with PF74, CPSF6, or Nup153 have been available;37,38,39 however, mutations that were engineered to facilitate crystallization of hexameric CA (E45C, A14C, W184A, M185A), interfered with the comprehensive description of the inter-hexamer interactions. These primarily involve helices α9 at the 2-fold interface (α9_hex1 and α9_hex2), and helices α10 at the 3-fold interface (α10_hex1, α10_hex2, and α10_hex3). [Note: herein, we use the terms _hex1, _hex2, and _hex3 as descriptors for helices from hexamers 1, 2, and 3 that are engaged in inter-hexamer interactions; we refer to intra-hexamer interactions between helices in 3 neighboring subunits of the same hexamer using prime (΄), no prime, or double prime (΄΄), Supplementary Fig. 1]. To understand how CA binding to PF74, CPSF6 or Nup153 can be affected by changes at the 2-fold α9_hex1–α9_hex2 inter-hexamer interface imparted by the E45A mutation, we compared the structures of native WT CA in complex with peptides from CPSF6 or Nup153 solved herein, or with PF74 (previously described18). All structures have been solved in the native background, and thus encompass the authentic α9_hex1–α9_hex2 inter-hexamer interfaces.
In addition to the role of E45A and P38A we examined the role of respective second-site compensatory mutations, T216I and R132T, which have been selected by Yang et al.33. These mutations rescued the infectivity impairment caused by the original mutations without correction of the intrinsic capsid stability defect33 (data summarized in Supplementary Table 1). Structural elucidation of the effects of P38A, E45A, and R132T mutations has been limited to analyzing chemical shift changes by NMR spectroscopy using the purified N-terminal CA domain33. The exact structural effects of the mutations in the context of full-length CA and core assemblies remain unclear.
To address these knowledge gaps, we primarily focused our analysis on P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, and E45A/R132T CA mutations. To understand how these affect access to the PF74/CPSF6/Nup153 binding pocket, we also solved structures of native WT with CPSF6 or Nup153 peptides and compared them to our previous WT, WT/PF74 structures in the native background. To characterize the effects of primary and compensatory mutations we assessed the assembly competence of CA mutants in vitro; conducted morphology studies using cryo-EM; analyzed core stability and uncoating using the CypA-DsRed live imaging assay; employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to assess in silico the effect of mutations on lattice thermal stability, ion and water permeability, flexibility, and electrostatics.
Results and discussion
Crystallographic analysis
We have crystallized and solved the structures of full-length CA bearing P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, or E45A/R132T substitutions in the native, full-length WT CA background (Supplementary Fig. 2)18. Similar to CA WT, the crystal structures of CA mutants have been solved in space group P6 with one molecule per asymmetric unit (Supplementary Table 2). Flanking neighboring subunits of CA monomers are represented as CA΄ and CA΄΄ (left and right, respectively; nomenclature is described in Supplementary Fig. 1).
X-ray structures of P38A and P38A/T216I CA
P38A CA: The structures of P38A (resolution 2.4 Å) and P38A/T216I (resolution 2.6 Å), are very similar to that of WT CA (RMSD 0.32 and 0.41 Å, respectively), demonstrating conservation of the overall global fold of the protein6,18. Residue 38 is located in the middle of the helix α2, which together with helices α1 and α3 form the 18-helix barrel at the center of the hexamer. Consistent with the previous structural assessment by NMR33 and compared to WT CA, P38A CA exhibits subtle changes that are dispersed over a wide region (Fig. 1). The affected residues are located proximal to the site of mutation in helices α1 (E29, K30), α2 (P34, E35, V36, I37, mutation site A38, M39, S41, A42), and in the neighboring intra-hexamer subunit (marked with ΄) in helices α1΄ (L20΄, E28΄), and in α3΄ (T54΄) (Fig. 1b). Moreover, the changes extend downstream from the site of mutation, altering the preceding loop between helices α1 and α2 (A31, F32, S33) (Fig. 1c). Further changes at the end of helix α7 (R143, M144, Y145) are mediated primarily via F32 in the affected loop, which in turn remodel the loop between helices α8 and α9 (Q176) (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, additional rearrangements are observed at the beginning of helix α8΄΄ (R162΄΄) in the other neighboring intra-hexamer subunit (marked with ΄΄) due to the changes in α7 (Fig. 1c). Finally, there are changes upstream from the mutation site that alter the network of interactions between E45 (in the loop between α2 and α3) within one subunit and residues of the neighboring subunit: P1΄ and H12΄ in the β΄-sheet), Q50΄ in helix α3΄, and D51΄ in helix α3΄ (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 3c). Notably, this network of interactions has been reported to potentially affect the β-hairpin conformation40.
a A CA hexamer is shown in surface view representation with three neighboring intra-hexamer CA monomers colored in orange (subunit ΄), yellow (subunit without prime symbol), and green (subunit ΄΄); the other three are shown in gray. P38A mutation site is marked with a red star in the yellow subunit. The P38A mutation affects regions in three subunits, shown in light blue surface view. b–d Superposition of WT (cartoon ribbons of three neighboring subunits colored in green, yellow, and orange) and P38A (in blue) CA. The mutation alters inter-hexamer CANTD-CANTD b, d and CANTD-CACTD interfaces c. Specific residues affected by P38A mutation (in red) are shown as sticks. For clarity, residues E35, V36, I37 are not shown. Dashed lines are shown between residues that are within 4 Å. Box colors in b–d correspond to the boxed regions in a. Dashed box in b is an insert of a region within the other box in b. For reference, the relative position of the revertant site, T216΄΄, not mutated here, is shown in red in c.
Thus, the P38A mutation initiates a cascade of subtle changes that alter the network of intra-protomer (CANTD-CACTD), as well as inter-protomer (CANTD-CANTD΄ and CANTD-CACTD΄΄) interactions, thus altering the structure of three neighboring subunits within a hexamer (Fig. 1a). The structural changes cause a decrease in the calculated interface area (IA) at the inter-CA interfaces (Supplementary Table 3) that likely results in the observed broad destabilization and “loosening of the CA structure”.
Similar rearrangements are observed in the crystal structure of P38A/T216I, presumably due to the P38A mutation (Supplementary Fig. 3d and 4a–c). The compensatory T216I is in helix α11΄΄, proximal to helix α7 of the neighboring intra-hexamer subunit that is affected by the P38A mutation (Fig. 1c). T216I results in subtle rearrangements close to the mutation site in helix α11΄΄ (mutation site I216΄΄, Q219΄΄, V221΄΄), and also affects helix α10 (I201΄΄, L202΄΄, K203΄΄, A204΄΄) and the loop between α10 and α11 (G206΄΄, P207΄΄, G208΄΄) (Supplementary Fig. 4d). As a result, there is >200% increase in the IA at the 3-fold CACTD-CACTD inter-hexamer interface, as compared to P38A. Moreover, a ~ 5% increase in the IA is observed at the other CA-CA interfaces (Supplementary Table 3). Notably, the T216I substitution instead of reversing the structural changes imparted by P38A, it induces subtle rearrangements that may lead to slight stabilization of the hexamers themselves as well as interactions between them, thus partially offsetting the destabilizing effect of P38A.
Crystallographic analysis of E45A and E45A/R132T CA mutants
While E45A also crystallizes in space group P6 as P38A and P38A/T216I, surprisingly, we obtained data from crystals with two different unit cell dimensions: a = b = 87.6 Å, c = 56.5 Å (resolution 2.5 Å, labeled E45Aa) and a = b = 92.5 Å, c = 57.8 Å (resolution 2.2 Å, labeled E45Ab) (Supplementary Table 2). Both structures reveal the overall global fold to be essentially the same as in WT CA. Superpositions of E45Aa and E45Ab with WT CA revealed larger deviations of atomic positions (RMSD 1.44 and 0.81 Å) compared to P38A and P38A/T216I.
The ~5% difference in the unit cell dimensions between E45Aa and E45Ab is explained by the repositioning of the loop between helices α8 and α9 (~3 Å movement) in E45Aa. This important movement primarily affects interactions at the 2-fold interface between neighboring hexamers; specifically, between helix α9 from one hexamer (α9_hex1) and the same α9 helix from the neighboring hexamer (α9_hex2). Of note, the adjoining 310_hex1 and 310_hex2 helices are also slightly rearranged in the E45Aa structure (Supplementary Fig. 5a and b). In addition, the changes are also translated to helices α10 and α11 that help form the 3-fold inter-hexamer interface (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). As a result, the hexamers in E45Aa arrange more tightly than in WT CA or E45Ab (Fig. 2), forming extended interactions (Supplementary Table 6) at the 2-fold and 3-fold CACTD-CACTD inter-hexamer interfaces that are distant from the location of mutation. Interface area calculations reveal that E45Aa has ~160% (726.2 vs. 453.2 Å2) and ~510% (236.4 vs. 46.3 Å2) more buried surface than WT CA at the 2-fold and 3-fold, respectively (Supplementary Table 3). Moreover, there are more inter-subunit interactions in E45Aa than in WT and in E45Ab. Notably, a novel inter-hexamer interface is formed in E45Aa between N-terminal domains along the 3-fold symmetry axis (IA 23.9 Å2) mediated by R82 of the E45Aa CANTDs (Fig. 2) and a H2O molecule (6 H2O per hexamer). To our knowledge, this interaction is absent in all other CA structures. Thus, the enhanced buried surface area and inter-subunit interactions observed in E45Aa may contribute to a “tighter” structure of E45Aa, further stabilized by CANTD-CANTD interactions at the 3-fold inter-hexamer interface, potentially contributing to the hyper-stabilization effect observed for HIV-1 E45A cores. Because there is considerably more buried surface area and inter-subunit interactions in E45Aa than in E45Ab we expect the former conformation to be more relevant for the stabilization effects of the E45A mutation.
Neighboring hexamers in the lattices of CA WT, E45Aa, E45Ab, and E45A/R132T are shown in surface representation and also in enlarged views. CANTDs are colored in green, CACTDs in purple. R82 is labeled and shown as sticks. Residue 45 and 132 mutation sites are shown as orange and yellow circles, respectively. The 3-fold inter-hexamer interface interactions present in E45Aa and not in WT are: at the CACTD-CACTD interface: I201/A204, K203/T216, K203/A217, K203/G220, A204/L205, P207/E212, P207/E213, and P207/T216 (Supplementary Table 6); at the CANTD-CANTD interface: N21/A22, E35/V59, S41/H2O/Q50, A42/H2O/I15, L43/P17.
The E45A mutation primarily remodels the neighboring network of interactions (Supplementary Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 4). This involves residues in the loop between helices α2 and α3 (S44, A45, G46), helix α7 (E128, K130, R132) of one subunit, as well as residues in helix α3΄ (Q50΄, D51΄) and β-hairpin (P1΄, H12΄) of the neighboring intra-hexamer subunit (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b, e, and f, Supplementary Table 4). As a result, there is a ~ 10% increase in the IA at the intra-hexamer interfaces of E45Ab (1,221.6 vs. 1,118.8 Å2). Additional subtle changes are observed at the inter-hexamer interfaces resulting in a ~ 10% (409.1 vs. 453.2 Å2) and ~40% (32.4 vs. 46.3 Å2) decrease in the IA at the 2-fold and 3-fold, respectively (Supplementary Table 3). Notably, this region was also altered by the P38A mutation (Supplementary Fig. 3a–d, Supplementary Table 6).
Similar changes are observed in the E45A/R132T (resolution 2.0 Å) structure (Supplementary Fig. 3g, Supplementary Table 4). The second-site mutation, R132T, located in helix α7 near E45A, partially restores extended water-mediated interactions impaired by E45A. Additionally, there is a decrease with respect to WT, in the IA at the intra- and inter-hexamer interfaces (Supplementary Table 3). This suggests that R132T may at least partially decrease the excess stability of the hexamers and hexagonal lattice imparted by E45A.
Surprisingly, comparison of the E45Aa and E45Ab structures with resolved β-hairpins revealed that they assume two distinct conformations that differ by ~11 Å (as measured by the displacement of the Q7 Cα): ‘open’ in the E45Aa, and ‘closed’ in the E45Ab (Fig. 3a). Similarly, a comparison of available CA crystal structures40 showed that different β-hairpin conformations result from a pivoting movement of ~39° about the N-terminal proline (P1). In the E45Ab structure where the β-hairpin assumes ‘closed’ conformation, P1 forms a salt-bridge with D5131 (Fig. 3b). In the E45Aa where β-hairpin assumes ‘open’ conformation, D51 maintains interaction with P1 and now adds a second salt-bridge interaction with H12 (in yellow, Fig. 3b). Notably, six R18 residues in the middle of the ‘open’ E45Aa and ‘closed’ E45Ab hexamers, similarly adopt ‘open’ and ‘closed’ R18-ring conformations (Fig. 3c, d), resulting in pores with a diameter of ~11 Å and 5 Å, respectively. In the absence of biological data preferentially supporting one over the other E45A structures, it is possible that both conformations are present during infection.
a Superposition of N-terminal domains from E45Aa (CANTD in light green, β-hairpin in yellow) and E45Ab (CANTD in green, β-hairpin in orange). b Detailed view of the dashed boxed region in a shows that ‘open’ (yellow) and ‘closed’ (orange) β-hairpin conformations are the result of the hydrogen-bond network around P1, H12 and D51. c Detailed view of the solid boxed region in a shows that R18A toggles between ‘open’ and ‘closed’ states. d β-hairpin conformations dictate the presence of a pore at the 6-fold axis. E45Aa and E45Ab hexamers are shown in surface view representation with CANTDs in light green and green, CACTDs in light purple and purple. β-Hairpin in E45Aa structure is shown in white and yellow, while in E45Ab in light orange and orange. The boxed region shows a detailed view at the 6-fold axis in cartoon with R18 shown as sticks.
Notably, the altered α9_hex1–α9_hex2 inter-hexamer conformation in E45Aa with respect to other CA proteins is restored to WT-like interactions in E45A/R132T (Supplementary Fig. 5a and b).
Thus, the combined effects of CA mutations (P38A and T216I or E45A and R132T) on core structure are highly complex, affecting not only the mutation sites, but also modulating inter- and intra-hexamer interactions.
Comparison of WT/PF74, WT/CPSF6, WT/Nup153 with E45Aa and E45A/R132T crystal structures
The shared CA binding site targeted by PF74, CPSF6, and Nup153 is near α9΄ of a neighboring CA within the same hexamer (Supplementary Fig. 6a, Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). At the same time, α9 forms the inter-hexamer 2-fold interface by interacting with α9 from a neighboring hexamer (α9_hex1–α9_hex2; Supplementary Fig. 5a, b, b, and d). Because in E45Aa the α9_hex1–α9_hex2 inter-hexamer interaction is changed with respect to WT but restored to WT-like in E45A/R132T (Supplementary Fig. 5a and b), we hypothesized that the conformational variability of the α9_hex1–α9_hex2 inter-hexamer region affects the phenotypic differences in ligand binding at the PF74/CPSF6/Nup153 pocket of various Cas. To help address this hypothesis we also solved structures of native WT CA complexes with CPSF6 (WTCPSF6) or Nup153 (WTNup153) peptides (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 6) at 2.5 and 2.4 Å resolution, and analyzed them together with E45Aa and our previous native WT CA, WTCA, and WTPF74 structures18, thus enabling structural comparisons in the context of native CAs bound to PF74/CPSF6/Nup153 ligands. The reason we could not rely on information on α9_hex1–α9_hex2 from previously solved structures of cross-linked CA in complex with CPSF6 (CAXL-CPSF6) or Nup153 (CAXL-Nup153), is that mutations W184A and M185A at the α9 helix severely affected the inter-hexamer region:37,39 specifically, we see significant differences between WTCPSF6 and CAXL-CPSF6 or between WTNup153 and CAXL-Nup153 at the 2-fold (Supplementary Fig. 6c) regions. Comparison of WTCA to WTCPSF6 or WTNup153 revealed some minor structural differences at the 2-fold (Supplementary Fig. 6d) and 3-fold (Supplementary Fig. 6e) regions, and binding of the CPSF6 or Nup153 to native WTCA CA (WTCPSF6 or WTNup153) or the cross-linked CAXL (CAXL-CPSF6 or CAXL-Nup153) was essentially the same.
Comparison of the E45Aa, E45A/R132T, WTCA, WTPF74, WTCPSF6, and WTNup153 revealed that repositioning of the α9 helix in E45Aa may lead to steric interference that could affect access to the PF74/CPSF6/Nup153 pocket (Supplementary Fig. 7). In turn, the R132T secondary mutation in E45A/R132T appears to restore the local structure to WT-like conformation, likely enabling unfettered access to the PF74/CPSF6/Nup153 pocket (Supplementary Fig. 7). Lenacapavir (LEN), a long-acting capsid-targeting antiviral developed by Gilead41 and recently approved for anti-HIV therapy as Sunleca, also binds at this pocket42. Therefore, we expect that the structural changes in the α9-helix will prevent binding of these antivirals. Of note, the recently published clinical reports on LEN resistance mutations do not include E45A, likely because this mutation structurally disrupts the pocket where host factors CPSF6 and Nup153 need to be accommodated for the virus to be able to replicate.
Morphology studies using cryo-EM
It is known that CA is capable of different assembly pathways in vitro depending on the protein concentration, pH, or ionic strength43,44,45. The sensitivity of the higher-order structures to such factors indicates that polar interactions on the multimer surface regulate their formation43. Previous studies of the assembly properties of CA mutants by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that P38A and E45A assembled with efficiencies similar to that of the CA WT2 at protein concentrations of 5, 10, and 15 mg/ml.
To evaluate the effects of compensatory mutations on the assembly competence of CA mutants, we incubated CA at high salt and analyzed cylinder formation in cryo-electron micrographs (cryo-EM). Under these conditions, P38A CA does not assemble into tubular structures; however, tubular assembly was rescued by T216I (Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). Consistent with the structural diversity observed in the E45Aa and E45Ab structures, E45A CA assembles into a mixture of short tubes and cones (Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). As in P38A/T216I, R132T, reverts the E45A assembly morphology to that of WT CA long tubes. These results are consistent with the pelleting assay that allows to evaluate assembly efficiency of CA proteins (Supplementary Fig. 8c). The E45A CA assembles more efficiently comparted to the CA WT and other CA mutants, while the assembly of P38A CA is largely impaired. These observations are consistent with the characterization of CA mutants P38A as unstable and E45A as hyperstable1. Interestingly, under the conditions of this assay, compensatory mutations T216I and R132T, reverted the effect of the primary mutation on the assembly competence of mutant proteins.
Evaluation of core stability using CypA-DsRed loss assay
Biochemical studies have shown that detergent-treated purified capsids tend to disassemble in a temperature-dependent manner, and mutations in CA can strongly modulate core stability1. Consistent with our data (Supplementary Fig. 9a–c), intact cores could be recovered from WT, but not from P38A virions, presumably due to their reduced stability. Cores from E45A CA yielded greater quantities, and were found to disassemble more slowly than WT CA-containing cores, when heated at 37 °C1. Notably, cores recovered from P38A/T216I and E45A/R132T did not behave very differently from P38A and E45A33.
We have used virus-imaging to evaluate the effect of mutations on the stability of cores. This strategy enables visualization of HIV-1 uncoating using a fluorescently-tagged oligomeric form of a capsid-binding host protein, cyclophilin A (CypA-DsRed), which is specifically packaged into virions through high-avidity binding to CA46. Single virus imaging revealed that CypA-DsRed remained associated with cores after permeabilization/removal of the viral membrane and that CypA-DsRed and CA were lost concomitantly from the cores in vitro and in living cells46. The rate of loss was modulated by the core stability and was accelerated upon the initiation of reverse transcription.
To evaluate the effects of P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, and E45A/R132T CA mutations on uncoating and core stability, we employed the CypA-DsRed loss assay. CypA-DsRed was lost from the permeabilized E45A particles much slower than from WT particles (Supplementary Fig. 9a, b. Addition of R132T resulted in a decreased stability for the E45A/R132T cores, albeit still higher than that of WT, especially at later time points (Supplementary Fig. 9b). The vast majority of CypA-DsRed puncta disappeared in less than 5 minutes after membrane permeabilization of the P38A viruses (Supplementary Fig. 9a, c). The P38A/T216I cores became slightly more stable than P38A at later time points. Hence, consistent with previous reports33,47,48,49, the second-site suppressor mutations do not fully correct the respective stability defects imposed by E45A or P38A.
Molecular dynamics simulations
We also used MD simulations to probe the following correlates of structural stability: in silico thermal stability, the ion and water permeabilities, structure flexibility, electrostatics, as well as inter- and intra-hexamer interactions in WT and mutant lattices.
To assess the stability of the WT CA lattice compared to the hyper stable E45A and compensatory R132T mutant lattices, we performed tempering MD simulations to derive lattice melting temperature profiles (Fig. 4). As outlined in Supplementary Methods, we subjected each CA lattice construct to constant-pressure constant-temperature (NPT) simulations across a temperature range (310-500 K) with a stride of 10 K. We then analyzed the dimerization domains of the CA lattice CTDs to assess stability, using RMSD of the temperature replicas against the reference simulated at 310 K. This RMSD was then utilized to determine whether a dimer interface was disrupted; disruption was considered as a dimer interface heavy-atom RMSD > 3.5 Å from its 310 K reference. All computed RMSDs are shown in Fig. 4a.
a Dimer interface RMSD analysis for 2 × 3 × 3 hexameric CA lattices. Four constructs, WT, E45Aa, E45Ab, and E45A/R132T, were subjected to tempering simulations. Temperatures employed for NPT simulations were between 310 K and 500 K with a stride of 10 K. The RMSD is presented as the mean and standard deviation, of all dimers in each lattice (n = 32 dimer interfaces from each 2 × 3 × 3 hexameric lattice simulation), between backbone atoms comprising the interface. The reference structures were taken as the respective dimer interface simulated at 310 K. This reference point is included in the plot for clarity. b Tm profiles for all CA lattice constructs, based on the RMSD data shown in a. Based on the RMSD analysis, we consider a dimer interface to be disrupted if it deviates from its 310 K reference structure with a heavy-atom RMSD > 3.5 Å. Tm is the temperature where half of the dimer interfaces in the lattice are disrupted. This is visible as the point of intersection between the traces and the horizontal dashed line at a y-axis position of 0.5. For WT, this is 81.0 °C; for E45Aa and E45Ab, these are 141.8 and 136.9 °C, respectively; for E45A/R132T, this is 124.6 °C. c Snapshots of 1 × 3 × 3 lattice CTDs taken at select intervals across the temperature range sampled, providing a qualitative view of the lattice stability. E45Aa is robust even at the highest simulation temperatures. Snapshots of NTDs and CTDs for every temperature are shown in Supplementary Fig. 10.
In Fig. 4b, we show the fraction of disrupted dimers versus temperature for each CA construct; we consider the simulation temperature where half of all dimer interfaces are disrupted as the Tm. Remarkably, both E45Aa and E45Ab lattices are more stable than the WT and E45A/ R132T lattices. WT CA is the least stable, with a Tm of 81.0 °C. E45Aa and E45Ab lattices are the most stable (Tm = 141.8 and 136.9 °C, respectively). For E45A/R132T CA, there is a loss in stability (Tm = 124.6 °C). Our simulations corroborate that E45A significantly stabilizes the lattice, likely through abundant resulting CTD contacts. Further, addition of R132T confers a decrease in stability, matching what is observed experimentally for E45A/R132T CA. Figure 4c shows snapshots of the lattice CTDs at some of the simulated temperatures (Supplementary Fig. 10 shows both NTD and CTD snapshots for all systems across every simulated temperature).
To mimic the interior and exterior of the capsid, we built a model of two 3 × 3 planar hexamer lattices in a mirrored configuration (Supplementary Fig. 11, see Supplementary Methods for additional details). The middle water layer, enclosed by the CANTDs of the hexamers, represents the exterior environment of the HIV-1 capsid (Supplementary Fig. 12). Water molecules and ions in the model, were only able to exchange from/to the exterior to/from the interior of the capsid by crossing the hexamer layers. Using this model, we calculated the transfer rates of ions and water molecules in the case of WT and mutated CA hexamers (Supplementary Fig. 13). For each hexamer, the inwards and outwards transfer rates of each species were found to be similar. This suggests that ions and water are in thermal equilibrium between the inside and outside of the hexamer lattices. Interestingly, in all cases the transfer rate of chloride is much higher (at least two-fold) than the transfer rate of sodium (Supplementary Fig. 13a vs. b). In particular, the transfer rate of chloride through WT CA hexamers is 2.72 ± 0.33 and 2.77 ± 0.31 ions per ns, inwards and outwards, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 13a), whereas for sodium, the transfer rates through WT CA hexamers are 0.65 ± 0.16 (inwards) and 0.69 ± 0.26 (outwards) ions per ns (Supplementary Fig. 13b). Comparison of the ion transfer rates of mutated vs. WT CA hexamers, suggests that in general, mutations reduce the ability of the hexamers to transport ions to variable extent, except in the second-site suppressor mutant E45A/R132T and E45Ab (Supplementary Fig. 13a). Interestingly, the E45Aa CA hexamer has the lowest Na+ and water permeability among mutant hexamers. Nonetheless, the ability of the E45Aa CA hexamers to translocate ions and water is recovered by the introduction of the second-site mutation E45A/R132T. Notably, the P38A mutant reduces the anion permeability of the protein, while introduction of T216I in P38A/T216I slightly increases the chloride ion permeability (Supplementary Fig. 13a).
CA flexibility was assessed by means of the root mean squared fluctuation (RMSF) calculated using VMD, where larger fluctuations represent more flexible regions of the protein. Comparison of the RMSF of Cα for WT and mutant CA hexamers in Supplementary Fig. 14 shows the disordered or mobile regions (coils, turns) to have higher RMSF values than the helices. Moreover, comparison of the E45Aa hexamer with WT and E45A/R132T mutant hexamers suggests that E45Aa CA has slightly lower mobility (smaller RMSF values) in the C-terminal domains (Supplementary Fig. 14a). Among the three E45Aa, E45Ab, and E45A/R132T mutants, the generally slightly smaller RMSF value for E45Aa suggests that it is more rigid in the CACTD region. Similarly, comparison of the RMSF between CA WT, P38A, and P38A/T216I, indicates similar flexibilities among them, except the N- and C-terminus (Supplementary Fig. 14b). Moreover, the structural changes of WT and mutant hexamers (Supplementary Fig. 14c) also show that E45A mutations have smaller RMSDs with respect to their crystal structures. Hence, the mutations appear to have insignificant effects on the flexibility of CA, except E45A that reduce the flexibility of CA, especially in the C-terminal domains.
Electrostatic maps were calculated for single hexamer (Supplementary Fig. 15, Supplementary Fig. 16) and 3 × 3 lattices (Supplementary Fig. 17) of CA WT and mutant proteins. The electrostatic maps revealed two charged areas in the surface of the capsid. In particular, all hexamers present a highly positively charged area located in the central pore. Similarly, negative charges are localized in the boundary of hexamer-hexamer interfaces, particularly the two-fold and three-fold interfaces. The observed electrostatic changes at regions known to affect core stability and are thus consistent with the lattice stability changes calculated by the MD simulations. Electrostatic and Van der Waals (VDW) interaction energies between individual hexamers and their six surrounding neighbors were calculated for WT and mutant CA to evaluate the strength of the interactions between the respective hexamers. Overall, the electrostatic energy does not exhibit significant differences among hexamers from various proteins (difference <3%). Importantly, the two E45A single mutants display markedly stronger VDW inter-hexamer interactions than the WT and other mutants do (Supplementary Fig. 18). In contrast, addition of R132T to E45A reverses the E45A changes, leading to similar inter-hexamer VDW interaction energies for WT and E45A/R132T.
Implications for the structural mechanism of HIV-1 capsid stability and uncoating
Uncoating, or disassembly of the viral capsid, is a critical, yet poorly understood step of the HIV-1 life cycle. In the present work, we observed that T216I and R132T mutations can at least partially correct in vitro assembly defects imposed by P38A and E45A, respectively, without fully correcting the altered core stability (disassembly in Supplementary Fig. 9b, c) imposed by the original mutations. As suggested previously33, one possible explanation for this discrepancy could be that the available assays, even though improved over time, may be limited in their ability to detect subtle changes in capsid stability. Alternatively, the suppressor mutations may alter interactions with host factors that participate in HIV-1 uncoating in target cells.
The core stability is intrinsically connected to the strength of the interactions between the building blocks (mostly hexamers but also few pentamers) and between the monomers within each building block, with the latter having larger impact on the CA stability50. While crystal structures represent a single averaged conformation, they relate to the diverse CA subunits in an actual fullerene cone capsid as they likely recapitulate part of the large spectrum of similar conformations. The MD simulation stability data at the lattice level strengthen the relevance of these studies, as they show that a flat lattice recapitulates the defects on stability.
Our structural analysis of P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, and E45A/R132T CA proteins revealed short- and long-range rearrangements in HIV-1 CA. The structure of E45Aa exhibited notable changes with respect to WT, E45Ab and E45A/R132T structures: changes in CANTD-CANTD inter-hexamer interactions in Fig. 2; changes in CACTD-CACTD (α9_hex1 with α9_hex2) inter-hexamer interactions, in Supplementary Fig. 5a, b; beta-hairpin region and ring-of-six-R18 pore size changes in Fig. 3; and changes in intra-hexamer interactions (α3΄ with α2 and with β΄) in Supplementary Fig. 3.
The P38A mutation, by itself, or present together with T216I, initiates a cascade of subtle changes that result in remodeling of the CA-CA interaction network in a hexamer (Fig. 1). Notably, in the P38A structure (but not in P38A/T216I), these changes also affect the network of interactions between E45 (which is at the top of the α2 helix where 38 is present) of one subunit and residues of the neighboring hexamer. The second-site mutation T216I is at the 3-fold inter-hexamer interface; it induces further rearrangements that may lead to stabilization of interactions between hexamers, thereby partially offsetting the effect of P38A (Supplementary Fig. 4). On the other hand, E45A primarily remodels the network of polar and water-mediated interactions proximal to the site of mutation. R132T is near E45A and partially restores impaired water-mediated interactions (Supplementary Fig. 3g). Notably, second-site mutation-induced reversal of altered interactions around residue 45 are observed not only in E45A/R132T vs. E45A structures, but also in P38A/T216I vs. P38A structures. Hence, a key conclusion is that residue 45 is involved in capsid stability directly, as well as indirectly.
In terms of electrostatic changes, the E45A, and to a lesser extent, the P38A mutations alter the surface electrostatic potential in CA hexamers. Specifically, while E45 in WT CA is engaged in both attractive and repulsive ionic interactions with D51 from the neighboring subunit (Supplementary Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 5), the E45A mutation relieves local electrostatic repulsion (Supplementary Fig. 3e, f, 16b, c, Supplementary Table 5), thus stabilizing the E45A CA hexamer. In addition, both E45Aa and E45Ab structures have variable interactions of the beta hairpin base with D51, also resulting in local electrostatic changes (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Figs. 3e, f, 16b, c). In P38A the interactions around E45 are altered, leading to an increase in the electrostatic repulsion between E45 and D51, and destabilization of the P38A CA hexamer (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Figs. 3c and 15b, Supplementary Table 5). Compensatory mutations T216I and R132T, respectively, may affect the charge distribution of CA (Supplementary Figs. 3d, g, 15c, and 16d). Those local changes in surface electrostatic potential may help explain differences in susceptibility to PF74 and interactions with host factors, including CPSF6, Nup153, TRIM5, CypA, TNPO3, and nucleoporins from the nuclear pore complex (Supplementary Table 1). Most importantly, the unique interactions between the α9_hex1 and α9_hex2 helices from neighboring hexamers in the E45Aa structure (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b), directly affect access to the common binding site of PF74, Nup153, and CPSF6 (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). This decreased accessibility is not present in E45A/R132T, as the structure of this region is restored to a WT-like conformation (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Collectively, our data shed light on how the changes in α9_hex1 and α9_hex2 helices in E45Aa affect binding of PF7433,34,35, decrease in restriction by CPSF6-35836,37, and by TRIM-Nup15337,38 and also show how E45A/R132T may reverse such effects as it restores the structure of this region to a WT-like conformation (Supplementary Fig. 5b).
The T216I mutation has been shown to reverse the impaired ability of the P38A mutant to abrogate TRIMCyp- and TRIM5α-mediated restriction of HIV-1 (Supplementary Table 1)33. It has been shown that TRIM5α binding involves multiple capsid molecules along the 2-fold and 3-fold inter-hexamer interfaces51,52. Thus, our observed structural changes at the 3-fold interface in P38A/T216I may explain the rescue of the ability to abrogate TRIM5α restriction. Alternatively, T216I may simply restore capsid stability and thus the ability to deplete TRIM5α. Recent statistical analysis implicates the CypA binding loop region in binding of CA TRIM5α53. As this loop is involved in crystal contacts, any changes between mutant CA structures at this location would be difficult to interpret.
Unexpectedly, E45A CA crystallized in two different forms under very similar crystallization conditions. While the overall fold of E45A in both structures is essentially the same, their inter- and intra-hexamer interactions differ; the E45Aa structure appears to be stabilized by a novel 3-fold inter-hexamer interface formed between N-terminal domains of the E45A CA (residue R82 in Fig. 2). To our knowledge, this is the first report of CNTD-CNTD inter-hexamer interactions that may be a major factor in the increased stability of the E45A capsid. The differences in intra-hexamer interactions are caused by changes at multiple sites. Loss of interactions between E45 and D51 from the neighboring subunit (Supplementary Fig. 3b vs. e, and f, Supplementary Tables 4 and 5) enables D51 to form H-bonds with either P1 or H12 residue, while remaining virtually unmoved (Fig. 3b). The two different conformations (E45Aa and E45Ab) are likely the result of differences in the protonation state of H12 (crystals were set at pH ~6.5, near the pKa of H12), which in turn affected the H12-D51 interactions (Supplementary Fig. 3e, f). This is consistent with the proposed effect of pH on the conformation of the β-hairpin40. Remarkably, the differences in H12-D51 interactions directly result in significant changes at the top of the pore at the 6-fold symmetry axis, where the β-hairpin was observed in an “open” conformation in E45Aa and a “closed” conformation in E45Ab (Fig. 3). Likely connected to these rearrangements at the top of the pore, we also observe changes deeper in that channel: specifically, the six R18 side chains are in the “up” conformation in E45Aa where the β-hairpin is “open”, and in the “down” conformation in E45Ab where the β-hairpin is “closed” (Fig. 3c, d). The ring of R18s forms a pore of variable size ( ~ 11 Å diameter in E45Aa), which has been proposed to facilitate transit of negatively charged small molecules (including deoxynucleoside triphosphates, dNTPs) to the interior of HIV-1 E45A capsid40. The two solved E45A structures confirm maximum pore flexibility under near physiological conditions. Of note, the E45A structures can only be structurally studied with our crystallographic system of native CA, as the cross-linkable crystallographic system6,40 relies on an engineered disulfide bond between E45C and A14C.
It has been previously observed that E45A cores appear to be more permeable to fluorescent dyes than WT cores54. Moreover, E45A HIV-1 exhibited a rapid viral RNA decay profile and a more rapid accumulation of early reverse transcripts. As a result, it was concluded that the E45A capsid dissociated early after infection54. Our data provide evidence that enlarged pores can exist in the intact E45A capsid, allowing an enhanced influx of dyes and dNTPs, which may explain the observed phenotypes.
It has been proposed that the highly hydrated character of the CA is compatible with the quasi-equivalent switching mechanism, because water molecules should be particularly adept at repositioning to accommodate altered orientations in hydrogen bonding and side chain packing geometries6,8. Interestingly, the hyperstable E45A has a significantly different hydration layer than the unstable P38A, consistent with the hypothesis that structured water molecules may contribute to the stabilization of capsid18.
We propose that the intra-hexamer electrostatic repulsion between E45 and D51 from neighboring CA monomers is a functionally important interaction. These residues are forced into proximity within the hexamer structure and they are also interacting with one or both ends of the β-hairpin (P1 and H12, Supplementary Fig. 3). Hence, this network of interactions can provide an environmentally-sensitive switch that can affect the conformation of the β-hairpin, the presence of the pore, and also the stability of the core and its disassembly (or uncoating) of the viral capsid. This mechanism is additionally supported by site-directed mutagenesis data, as mutating the carboxylate group of D51 to the corresponding amide (N51) results in capsids that exhibit significantly increased stability compared to CA WT55. Moreover, D51N formed long tubular structures in vitro comparable to CA WT, both in terms of external diameter and length of the tubes56.
Collectively, the structures support the hypothesis that CA plasticity is a key factor for its stability and interactions with antivirals and host factors. The possibility of capsid stability regulation through changes in pH, dNTP recruitment and DNA synthesis, provides a model whereby DNA synthesis is coordinated with uncoating to cloak the viral genome from cytoplasmic DNA sensing.
Methods
Design, expression and purification of CA mutants
WT, P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, E45A/R132T CA proteins were cloned in a pET11a construct18. Mutations were introduced using overlap extension PCR cloning and verified by DNA sequencing. WT and mutant P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, E45A/R132T CA proteins were expressed and purified as previously described18,57.
Crystallization of CA mutants
Crystals of WT P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, E45A/R132T CA grew at 18 °C in hanging drops, containing 2–5 mg/ml of protein, 2–14% PEG 3350, 2–6% glycerol, sodium iodide, and sodium cacodylate. Hexagonal plate-like crystals appeared after 5 days and crystal growth was completed in over 2 weeks. Crystals were briefly soaked in 20% glycerol or paraffin oil before cryo-cooling in liquid nitrogen. For the WTCPSF6 and WTNup153 complexes, peptides (CPSF6313–324 with sequence PVLFPGQPFGQP and Nup1531407–1423 with sequence TNNSPSGVFTFGANSST) were soaked into unliganded WT crystals for approximately 24 h.
Data collection and structure determination
Data were collected on a MAR CCD (23-ID-B), Dectris Eiger-16m (23-ID-B) or Pilatus3 6 M (23-ID-D) detectors at the Advanced Photon Source, Sector 23, and on a CMOS detector at Advanced Light Source (ALS) beamline 4.2.2, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Datasets were collected and processed using XDS58. The data were examined for the presence of systematic absences, however, no characteristic patterns were observed. Thus, the crystals were indexed in hexagonal space group P6 with one CA molecule in the asymmetric unit. No twinning was present, as determined by either POINTLESS (version 1.10.21)59 or XTRIAGE (version 1.11.1-2575_1692)60. Space group and twinning were also verified by ZANUDA61. The phase problem of CA was solved either using single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) or molecular replacement, with the native CA (PDB ID: 4XFX) as the starting model. For SAD, substructure solution, phasing, density modification, model building, and refinement were carried out using SHELX C/D, SOLOMON, PARROT, BUCCANEER and REFMAC in CRANK-2 (version 2.0.111)61. For molecular replacement, initial phases were solved via PHASER (version 2.7.17)61. Several rounds of iterative model building and refinement were carried out using Coot (version 0.8.8)62 and PHENIX (version 1.11.1-2575_1692)60, REFMAC (version 5.8.0155)61,63, or PDBREDO (version 6.24; https://pdb-redo.eu/), respectively. Structure validation of final models was performed with MOLPROBITY (version 4.5.2; http://molprobity.biochem.duke.edu/). Accessible and buried surface area were calculated using PISA (version 1.5.0)61. The figures showing structural information were generated in PyMOL (version 1.7.6.7; http://www.pymol.org/). Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB; see additional details in the Data Availability statement). Data collection and refinement statistics are provided in Supplementary Table 2. Representations of the asymmetric unit, biological assembly, and electron density maps of regions of interest can be found in Supplementary Fig. 19.
Pelleting assay
CA WT and mutants (P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, and E45A/R132T) were assembled at 2 mg/ml (80 µM) in buffer containing 1 M NaCl and 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 at 37 °C for 1 h. A total of 5 µl samples were withdrawn from the reaction mixtures and immediately used for cryo-EM analysis. The remaining sample was pelleted at 21,000×g for 30 min at 4 °C. Supernatants (S) and pellets (P) were mixed with 4 × LDS loading buffer (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), without boiling, resolved on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie Blue. Experiments were performed as three biological replicates, with one representative gel shown in Supplementary Fig. 8c.
Morphology studies of CA mutants
The fresh assembled samples (4 μl) were applied to the carbon side of a glow discharged perforated Quantifoil grid (Quantifoil Micro Tools, Jena, Germany). The grids were then manually blotted with a filter paper from backside to remove the excess fluid, and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane using a home-made gravity plunger. For cryo-EM imaging, the frozen grids were loaded into a cryo-holder (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA), inserted into a Tecnai F20 transmission electron microscope (FEI, Inc., Hillsboro, OR) and imaged with a 4k×4k charge-coupled device camera (Gatan). Low dose ( ~ 20 e−/Å2) projection images were recorded at a nominal magnification of 50,000 × with a pixel size of 2.26 Å and underfocus values ranging from 3.0 to 5.0 µm. The low magnification images were recorded at the magnification 5,000 ×. Experiments were performed as three biological replicates, with representative images shown in Supplementary Fig. 8a, b.
CypA-DsRed loss assay
HIV-1 viruses bearing P38A, P38A/T216I, E45A, and E45A/R132T mutations were produced in 293 T cells (obtained from and validated by ATCC, Manassas, VA) by incorporating INsfGFP and CypA-DsRed46. Viruses were bound to poly-l-lysine treated coverglass and viral membrane was permeabilized with 100 µg/ml saponin for 1 min followed by 1× wash with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (dPBS). The solution was replaced with 200 µl dPBS, and four fields of view were imaged at room temperature. The total numbers of INsfGFP spots and CypA-DsRed spots as a function of time were determined for each condition. HIV-1 core (CypA-DsRed) retention was calculated for the first time point for each CA mutant by using the respective INsfGFP-signal (pre-/post-saponin) as reference. The core stability was determined by plotting the loss of CypA-DsRed spots over-time, normalized to the initial number of spots. The number of INsfGFP spots remained constant and served as a reference marker. Cyclosporine A (CsA) 5 μM was added at 22 min after virus permeabilization. Immature particles that retained CypA-DsRed and failed to respond to CsA treatment were excluded from analysis. Plots in Supplementary Fig. 9 are means and standard errors from 4 independent experiments; for each experiment,
Molecular modeling
Model building
The structures of mutant CA hexamers, namely E45Ab, E45Aa, E45A/R132T, P38A, and P38A/T216I were used as the starting point for all mutant simulations in the present study; missing residues were added using Modeller64. For simulations of CA WT, a previously reported structure of the hexamer was employed (PDB ID: 4XFX). To mimic the interior and exterior of the capsid, two 3 ×3 planar hexamer lattices were built in a mirrored configuration (Supplementary Fig. 11). The facing lattices were placed at least 4 nm away from each other to avoid interactions between the two protein layers. The middle water layer, enclosed by the CANTDs of the hexamers, represents the exterior environment of the HIV-1 capsid (Supplementary Fig. 12). Conversely, the other two layers of water represent the interior of the capsid and are connected together due to the periodicity of the simulation along the z-axis. It is worth noting that water molecules and ions in the model could only exchange between the exterior and the interior of the capsid by crossing the hexamer layers.
The resulting lattices were solvated using the TIP3P water model employing the Solvate 1.5 plugin in VMD 1.9.465. Subsequently, extra water molecules were deleted, and the water boxes were shaped to fit in the periodic hexamer lattice of dimensions: a = b = 277 (except E45Aa: 263) and c = 235 (except E45Ab: 252) Å, with unit cell angles α = β = 90° and γ = 120°. The solvated systems were then neutralized by adding sodium and chloride ions and the total concentration of NaCl was set to 150 mM using Autoionize plugin (version 1.3) in VMD. The resulting models contained ~1.6 million atoms, including protein, water, and ions.
Molecular dynamics simulations
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for each of the models were performed using NAMD 2.1266 and CHARMM36 force field67. Each model was initially subjected to an energy minimization and followed by a thermalization of 10,000 steps, while applying harmonic restrains of 10 kcal·mol−1·Å−2 on the protein heavy atoms. After heating, the whole system was subjected to three steps of equilibration of 0.5 ns where the harmonic restraints were gradually released. Production simulations were carried out using a Langevin thermostat at 310 K and a Langevin piston barostat at 1.0 atmosphere; a v-RESPA integrator was employed with an internal time step of 2 fs and electrostatic interactions were treated using the PME (particle-mesh Ewald) algorithm with a 1.2 nm cutoff. Long-range interactions were updated every 4 fs while non-bonded interactions were recalculated every 2 fs. The SHAKE algorithm was applied to all hydrogen bonds. Simulations were performed with a total of at least 130 ns for each model in the Blue Waters super-computer.
Molecular dynamics simulations—Tempering
Tempering simulations of WT and mutant E45Aa, E45Ab and E45A/R132T hexameric lattices were accomplished using NAMD2.14. Utilizing the equilibrated systems, prepared according to above section, a series of constant-pressure constant-temperature (NPT) simulations were performed at varying temperatures; for all CA lattices, temperatures ranging from 310 K to 500 K, with a stride of 10 K, were employed. Target temperatures for the Langevin thermostat and Langevin piston barostat were set to the relevant temperature for each simulation. Tempering simulations utilized the CHARMM36m protein force field. Target pressures for the barostat were maintained at 1.0 atmosphere for all simulations. A v-RESPA integrator was employed with an internal timestep of 2 fs, and long-range electrostatics were computed using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) algorithm, the latter utilizing a distance cutoff of 1.2 nm. Long-range interactions were computed every 4 fs, while short-range interactions were computed every 2 fs. The SHAKE algorithm was employed to constrain all bonds to hydrogen.
Analysis of lattice thermal stability
To establish the thermal stability of the WT and CA mutant lattices, each dimer interface in the 2 × 3 × 3 hexameric systems was identified and aligned to its reference dimer modeled at a temperature of 310 K. Following alignment, the RMSD (measured in Å) among backbone heavy atoms in the C-terminal domains of monomers comprising the dimer interface was measured. A dimer interface was considered melted, or disrupted, when the RMSD was greater than or equal to 3.5 Å from its reference dimer. The fraction of melted dimers, taken as the number melted divided by the total number of dimer interfaces in the system, was then computed for each CA lattice construct at every temperature simulated. The Tm was then determined as the temperature where the fraction melted was equal to 0.5; that is, the temperature where half of the dimer interfaces deviated from their reference interface by more than 3.5 Å.
Analysis of ion and water transport through CA hexamers
Analysis of MD trajectories were performed using VMD65 and NAMD66. We began the analysis of the trajectories by calculating the exchange rates of ions and water molecules. First, based on the definition of the exterior and interior regions of the capsid, water molecules and ions in the exterior/interior region were labeled as exterior/interior molecules. Subsequently, the number of exterior/interior molecules at a reference time t0, which were found at a later time t > t0 on the opposite region of the capsid, interior/exterior, were counted. Importantly, the slopes of the counts versus time constitute the exchange rates for ion and water molecules (in number of molecules per ns) and were calculated.
Flexibility of WT and mutant CA hexamers
Flexibility of the capsid protein was assessed by means of the root mean squared fluctuation (RMSF) calculated using VMD65. Rotations and translations of the capsid lattices during the simulation were removed by aligning all the monomers to reference structures. The resulting RMSFs of Cα were averaged over the eighteen monomers present in each simulation.
Interaction energies between and within CA hexamers
The pair interaction function implemented in NAMD66 was used to calculate the electrostatic and Van der Waals interaction energies. Inter-hexamer interaction energies were calculated between a central hexamer and six surrounding hexamers and averaged during the course of the simulation.
Electrostatics of CA hexamer
Electrostatic calculations of the hexamer models were performed using the APBS package68. Starting from a 3 × 3 lattice of hexamers, the electrostatic density maps of each model were evaluated using an asynchronous parallel calculation. The electrostatic surfaces of the hexamer models were then visualized using VMD.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information file and from the corresponding author upon request. X-ray crystal structure coordinates and structure factor data have been deposited into the RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB) under accession codes 6AY9 (WT CA/CPSF6), 6AYA (WT CA/Nup153), 6B2G (P38A CA), 6B2H (P38A/T216I CA), 6B2I (E45Aa CA), 6B2J (E45Ab CA), 6B2K (E45A/R132T CA). The manuscript also refers to existing crystal structures 4XFX (WT CA) and 4XFZ (WT CA/PF74). The molecular dynamics datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8180089. The source data underlying Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 8c, 9b, c, 13a–c, 14a–c, and 18 are provided as a Source data file.
References
Forshey, B. M., von Schwedler, U., Sundquist, W. I. & Aiken, C. Formation of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 core of optimal stability is crucial for viral replication. J. Virol. 76, 5667–5677 (2002).
Ganser-Pornillos, B. K., von Schwedler, U. K., Stray, K. M., Aiken, C. & Sundquist, W. I. Assembly properties of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 CA protein. J. Virol. 78, 2545–2552 (2004).
von Schwedler, U. K., Stray, K. M., Garrus, J. E. & Sundquist, W. I. Functional surfaces of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid protein. J. Virol. 77, 5439–5450 (2003).
Lahaye, X. et al. The capsids of HIV-1 and HIV-2 determine immune detection of the viral cDNA by the innate sensor cGAS in dendritic cells. Immunity 39, 1132–1142 (2013).
Bulli, L. et al. Complex interplay between HIV-1 capsid and MX2-independent alpha interferon-induced antiviral factors. J. Virol. 90, 7469–7480 (2016).
Pornillos, O. et al. X-ray structures of the hexameric building block of the HIV capsid. Cell 137, 1282–1292 (2009).
Zhao, G. et al. Mature HIV-1 capsid structure by cryo-electron microscopy and all-atom molecular dynamics. Nature 497, 643–646 (2013).
Pornillos, O., Ganser-Pornillos, B. K. & Yeager, M. Atomic-level modelling of the HIV capsid. Nature 469, 424–427 (2011).
Jiang, J. et al. The interdomain linker region of HIV-1 capsid protein is a critical determinant of proper core assembly and stability. Virology 421, 253–265 (2011).
Rihn, S. J. et al. Extreme genetic fragility of the HIV-1 capsid. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003461 (2013).
Meng, X. et al. Protease cleavage leads to formation of mature trimer interface in HIV-1 capsid. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002886 (2012).
Gamble, T. R. Structure of the carboxyl-terminal dimerization domain of the HIV-1 capsid protein. Science 278, 849–853 (1997).
Deshmukh, L. et al. Structure and dynamics of full-length HIV-1 capsid protein in solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16133–16147 (2013).
Du, S. et al. Structure of the HIV-1 full-length capsid protein in a conformationally trapped unassembled state induced by small-molecule binding. J. Mol. Biol. 406, 371–386 (2011).
Ganser, B. K., Li, S., Klishko, V. Y., Finch, J. T. & Sundquist, W. I. Assembly and analysis of conical models for the HIV-1 core. Science 283, 80–83 (1999).
Li, S., Hill, C. P., Sundquist, W. I. & Finch, J. T. Image reconstructions of helical assemblies of the HIV-1 CA protein. Nature 407, 409–413 (2000).
Ganser-Pornillos, B. K., Cheng, A. & Yeager, M. Structure of full-length HIV-1 CA: a model for the mature capsid lattice. Cell 131, 70–79 (2007).
Gres, A. T. et al. STRUCTURAL VIROLOGY. X-ray crystal structures of native HIV-1 capsid protein reveal conformational variability. Science 349, 99–103 (2015).
Ni, T. et al. Intrinsic curvature of the HIV-1 CA hexamer underlies capsid topology and interaction with cyclophilin A. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 855–862 (2020).
Datta, S. A. et al. Interactions between HIV-1 Gag molecules in solution: an inositol phosphate-mediated switch. J. Mol. Biol. 365, 799–811 (2007).
Mallery, D. L. et al. IP6 is an HIV pocket factor that prevents capsid collapse and promotes DNA synthesis. Elife 7, e35335 (2018).
Obr, M. & Krausslich, H. G. The secrets of the stability of the HIV-1 capsid. Elife 7, e38895 (2018).
Dick, R. A. et al. Inositol phosphates are assembly co-factors for HIV-1. Nature 560, 509–512 (2018).
Dick, R. A., Mallery, D. L., Vogt, V. M. & James, L. C. IP6 regulation of HIV capsid assembly, stability, and uncoating. Viruses 10, 640 (2018).
Mallery, D. L. et al. Cellular IP6 levels limit HIV production while viruses that cannot efficiently package IP6 Are Attenuated for Infection and Replication. Cell Rep 29, 3983–3996 e3984 (2019).
Yu, A., Lee, E. M. Y., Jin, J. & Voth, G. A. Atomic-scale characterization of mature HIV-1 capsid stabilization by inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6). Sci. Adv. 6, eabc6465 (2020).
Xu, C. et al. Permeability of the HIV-1 capsid to metabolites modulates viral DNA synthesis. PLoS Biol. 18, e3001015 (2020).
Kucharska, I. et al. Biochemical reconstitution of HIV-1 assembly and maturation. J. Virol. 94, e01844–01819 (2020).
Dostalkova, A. et al. In vitro quantification of the effects of IP6 and other small polyanions on immature HIV-1 particle assembly and core stability. J. Virol. 94, e00991–00920 (2020).
Craveur, P. et al. Novel intersubunit interaction critical for HIV-1 core assembly defines a potentially targetable inhibitor binding pocket. mBio 10, e02858–02818 (2019).
von Schwedler, U. K. et al. Proteolytic refolding of the HIV-1 capsid protein amino-terminus facilitates viral core assembly. EMBO J. 17, 1555–1568 (1998).
Davey, N. E. et al. The HIV mutation browser: a resource for human immunodeficiency virus mutagenesis and polymorphism data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003951 (2014).
Yang, R. et al. Second-site suppressors of HIV-1 capsid mutations: restoration of intracellular activities without correction of intrinsic capsid stability defects. Retrovirology 9, 30 (2012).
Shi, J., Zhou, J., Shah, V. B., Aiken, C. & Whitby, K. Small-molecule inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection by virus capsid destabilization. J. Virol. 85, 542–549 (2011).
Shah, V. B. et al. The host proteins transportin SR2/TNPO3 and cyclophilin A exert opposing effects on HIV-1 uncoating. J. Virol. 87, 422–432 (2013).
Lee, K. et al. Flexible use of nuclear import pathways by HIV-1. Cell Host Microbe 7, 221–233 (2010).
Price, A. J. et al. Host cofactors and pharmacologic ligands share an essential interface in HIV-1 capsid that is lost upon disassembly. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004459 (2014).
Matreyek, K. A., Yucel, S. S., Li, X. & Engelman, A. Nucleoporin NUP153 phenylalanine-glycine motifs engage a common binding pocket within the HIV-1 capsid protein to mediate lentiviral infectivity. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003693 (2013).
Bhattacharya, A. et al. Structural basis of HIV-1 capsid recognition by PF74 and CPSF6. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 18625–18630 (2014).
Jacques, D. A. et al. HIV-1 uses dynamic capsid pores to import nucleotides and fuel encapsidated DNA synthesis. Nature 536, 349–353 (2016).
Link, J. O. et al. Clinical targeting of HIV capsid protein with a long-acting small molecule. Nature 584, 614–618 (2020).
McFadden, W. M. et al. Rotten to the core: antivirals targeting the HIV-1 capsid core. Retrovirology 18, 41 (2021).
Ehrlich, L. S., Agresta, B. E. & Carter, C. A. Assembly of recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid protein in vitro. J. Virol. 66, 4874–4883 (1992).
Campbell, S. & Vogt, V. M. Self-assembly in vitro of purified CA-NC proteins from Rous sarcoma virus and human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 69, 6487–6497 (1995).
Gross, I., Hohenberg, H. & Krausslich, H. G. In vitro assembly properties of purified bacterially expressed capsid proteins of human immunodeficiency virus. Eur. J. Biochem. 249, 592–600 (1997).
Francis, A. C., Marin, M., Shi, J., Aiken, C. & Melikyan, G. B. Time-resolved imaging of single HIV-1 uncoating in vitro and in living cells. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1005709 (2016).
Hulme, A. E., Kelley, Z., Okocha, E. A. & Hope, T. J. Identification of capsid mutations that alter the rate of HIV-1 uncoating in infected cells. J. Virol. 89, 643–651 (2015).
Jun, S. et al. Direct visualization of HIV-1 with correlative live-cell microscopy and cryo-electron tomography. Structure 19, 1573–1581 (2011).
Ingram, Z., Taylor, M., Okland, G., Martin, R. & Hulme, A. E. Characterization of HIV-1 uncoating in human microglial cell lines. Virol. J. 17, 31 (2020).
Ramalho, R., Rankovic, S., Zhou, J., Aiken, C. & Rousso, I. Analysis of the mechanical properties of wild type and hyperstable mutants of the HIV-1 capsid. Retrovirology 13, 17 (2016).
Morger, D. et al. The three-fold axis of the HIV-1 capsid lattice is the species-specific binding interface for TRIM5alpha. J. Virol. 92, e01541–17 (2018).
Forshey, B. M., Shi, J. & Aiken, C. Structural requirements for recognition of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 core during host restriction in owl monkey cells. J. Virol. 79, 869–875 (2005).
Yu, A. et al. TRIM5alpha self-assembly and compartmentalization of the HIV-1 viral capsid. Nat. Commun. 11, 1307 (2020).
Xu, H. et al. Evidence for biphasic uncoating during HIV-1 infection from a novel imaging assay. Retrovirology 10, 70 (2013).
Leschonsky, B., Ludwig, C., Bieler, K. & Wagner, R. Capsid stability and replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 are influenced critically by charge and size of Gag residue 183. J. Gen. Virol. 88, 207–216 (2007).
Abdurahman, S., Youssefi, M., Hoglund, S. & Vahlne, A. Characterization of the invariable residue 51 mutations of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid protein on in vitro CA assembly and infectivity. Retrovirology 4, 69 (2007).
Lanman, J., Sexton, J., Sakalian, M. & Prevelige, P. E. Jr. Kinetic analysis of the role of intersubunit interactions in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid protein assembly in vitro. J. Virol. 76, 6900–6908 (2002).
Kabsch, W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).
Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 72–82 (2006).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 1948–1954 (2002).
Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 (2011).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Murshudov, G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367 (2011).
Webb, B. & Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 54, 5.6.1–5.6.37 (2016).
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 14, 33–38 (1996).
Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).
Best, R. B. et al. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone ϕ, ψ and side-chain χ1 and χ2 dihedral angles. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 3257–3273 (2012).
Baker, N. A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M. J. & McCammon, J. A. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10037–10041 (2001).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health AI120860, AI150472, AI170855, and AI050409 (S.G.S.), AI150481 (P.Z.), AI129862 (G.B.M.), AI150581 (C.A.), AI148382 (G.B.M. and S.G.S.), and T32GM135060 and F31AI174951 (W.M.M.). S.G.S. acknowledges funding from the Nahmias-Schinazi Distinguished Chair in Research. This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source (APS), a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. X-ray diffraction data were collected at beamlines 23 ID-B and 23 ID-D. We are also grateful to Dr. Ruslan Sanishvili and all the staff of the APS Sector 23 (GM/CA-CAT) for helpful discussions regarding data collection, processing, refinement, and validation strategies. Initial crystal screening and data collection was performed with the assistance of Dr. Jay Nix at the beamline 4.2.2, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The Advanced Light Source is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
The molecular dynamics simulations in the present work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which is supported by National Science Foundation grant number OCI-1053575. Specifically, it used the Bridges system, which is supported by NSF award number ACI-1445606, at the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center (PSC). The present work was also supported by the NIH Cobre seed grant for development of Biomaterials.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.T.G. performed crystallization experiments, collected diffraction data, performed initial analysis of the data. H.D. expressed and purified proteins. D.L. performed cloning experiments. C.X., A.J.B., and J.R.P. performed molecular simulation experiments and described and analyze the relevant data. X.F. and P.Z. performed assembly assays and described the relevant data. A.C.F. and G.B.M. performed CypA-DsRed loss assay and described the relevant data. J.S. and C.A. shared mutant viruses. K.A.K. and S.G.S. supervised the project. A draft of the paper was initially written by A.T.G., and edited significantly by S.G.S., K.A.K., and W.M.M. All authors read and commented on the results and discussion of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gres, A.T., Kirby, K.A., McFadden, W.M. et al. Multidisciplinary studies with mutated HIV-1 capsid proteins reveal structural mechanisms of lattice stabilization. Nat Commun 14, 5614 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41197-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41197-7
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
