Molecular chaperones establish essential protein-protein interaction networks. Modified versions of these assemblies are generally enriched in certain maladies. A study published in Nature Communications used epichaperomics to identify unique changes occurring in chaperone-formed protein networks during mitosis in cancer cells.
‘Chaperome’ is defined as the ensemble of all cellular, molecular chaperones and their regulators, or co-chaperones, that assists the folding of native, intermediates, or misfolded proteins1,2. This process safeguards cellular proteostasis3. ‘Epichaperomes’ are long-lived heterooligomeric assemblies and disease-associated pathologic scaffolds composed of tightly bound chaperones, co-chaperones, and other factors. They play a key role in many maladies, including cancer and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, or Parkinson’s disease4. The molecular chaperones heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and heat-shock cognate protein 70 (Hsc70) and their co-chaperones are all essential for epichaperome formation4,5. Previous work has identified that 60–70% of tumors express medium-to-high levels of epichaperomes, independent of tissue origin, tumor subtype, or genetic background3. However, epichaperome detection and affinity purification, as well as the development of chemical disruptors and quantitation probes, remain a challenge. In this newly published work, Rodina et al. have used their previously reported and refined chemical probes (YK-type)6 for targeting and isolating epichaperome-associated Hsp70 (epiHsp70) proteins from cancer cells7. Their assessment of 73 cancer cell lines encompassing 9 tumor types, and 19 primary breast tumors, for either vulnerability to YKs or epiHsp70s levels suggest epiHsp70 formation occurs in approximately 70% of tumors. Epichaperomes represent a fraction of the total chaperone pools (approximately 5–35%, depending on the cancer cell line), and thus epiHsp70 is only a small amount when compared to the abundant Hsp70 levels. However, cancers appear to be depending on these epichaperomes for their overall survival and growth7.
Within cancer types, there are different levels of epichaperomes. For example, breast cancer MDA-MB-468 and pancreatic cancer ASPC1 cells have comparable Hsp70 levels and other epiHsp70 component chaperones but are differentiated by their epichaperome content, with MDA-MB-468 being epiHsp70s-high and ASPC1 epiHsp70s-low. Interestingly, Rodina et al. also used epiHsp70 epichaperomics to identify thousands of proteins that are primarily involved in the mitotic checkpoint pathway7. This dataset also includes the chaperones Hsp70, Hsp90, and Hsp110, the Hsp70 co-chaperone Hsp40, as well as the Hsp90 co-chaperones Aha1 (accelerator of Hsp90 ATPase activity), Cdc37 (kinase clients scaffold) and HOP (decelerator of Hsp90 ATPase) (Fig. 1). The authors further suggest that epiHsp70 proteins not only bind to individual mitotic proteins but also alter the complexation of such proteins. Thus, epiHSP70 may exert its effect on mitosis by altering the complex formation of mitotic checkpoint proteins. These alterations lead to an increase in the fitness of mitotic processes, and while it remains to be seen, perhaps ‘epichaperomes’ serve to promote chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in cancer. Ultimately, this study suggests that unique chaperone networks underlie diverse cellular pathways, and these networks can potentially be specifically interrogated and disrupted using chemical tools built on the YK scaffold.
Previous work has shown regulation of the cell cycle through phosphorylation of Hsp70 and Hsp90, also known as the chaperone code8,9,10,11. Furthermore, emerging clinical data identify Hsp90 inhibition as a promising anti-cancer therapeutic strategy12. Cancer cells generally display sensitivity and selectivity towards ATP-competitive Hsp90 inhibitors than their non-tumorigenic counterparts13,14. Contributing to this sensitivity is the fact that Hsp90 inhibitors are retained by tumors in vivo, likely as a consequence of Hsp90 binding, far longer than in normal tissues15. Mechanistically, it has been previously shown that the mitotic checkpoint kinase Mps1 phosphorylation of Hsp90 sensitizes cancer cells to Hsp90 inhibitors, and elevated Mps1 levels confer tumor selectivity toward amino-domain inhibitors of Hsp909.
Although studies demonstrating the impact of post-translational modifications (PTMs) on the formation of epichaperome complexes are currently lacking, the fact that chaperones and co-chaperones in the chaperome assemblies are post-translationally modified suggests that PTMs will impact the epichaperome assembly. The chaperone code lies at the heart of epichaperome formation, as PTMs (Fig. 1) dictate the chaperome network and chaperone-client interactions10,11,16,17. Therefore, the chaperone code may potentially play a major role in dictating epichaperome formation (Fig. 1). The chemical probes evaluated by Rodina et al. to assay the epichaperome can be used to provide valuable information on the impact of PTMs on epichaperome composition and function7. These new findings have described the impact of the epichaperome on the mitotic cell cycle, however, further work is necessary to characterize context-specific function and pathway regulation by distinct epichaperome populations. Future studies using epichaperomics will also identify the specific PTMs that are involved in epichaperome formation in a disease context. This will ultimately determine how drugs can effectively target epichaperomes in different maladies, including cancer.
References
Wang, X. et al. Hsp90 cochaperone Aha1 downregulation rescues misfolding of CFTR in cystic fibrosis. Cell 127, 803–815 (2006).
Chiosis G., Digwal C. S., Trepel J. B. & Neckers L. Structural and functional complexity of HSP90 in cellular homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-023-00640-9 (2023).
Balch, W. E., Morimoto, R. I., Dillin, A. & Kelly, J. W. Adapting proteostasis for disease intervention. Science 319, 916–919 (2008).
Rodina, A. et al. The epichaperome is an integrated chaperome network that facilitates tumour survival. Nature 538, 397–401 (2016).
Dean, M. E. & Johnson, J. L. Human Hsp90 cochaperones: perspectives on tissue-specific expression and identification of cochaperones with similar in vivo functions. Cell Stress Chaperones 26, 3–13 (2021).
Rodina, A. et al. Identification of an allosteric pocket on human hsp70 reveals a mode of inhibition of this therapeutically important protein. Chem Biol. 20, 1469–1480 (2013).
Rodina, A. et al. Systems-level analyses of protein-protein interaction network dysfunctions via epichaperomics identify cancer-specific mechanisms of stress adaptation. Nat. Commun. 14, 3742 (2023).
Truman, A. W. et al. CDK-dependent Hsp70 Phosphorylation controls G1 cyclin abundance and cell-cycle progression. Cell 151, 1308–1318 (2012).
Woodford, M. R. et al. Mps1 Mediated Phosphorylation of Hsp90 Confers Renal Cell Carcinoma Sensitivity and Selectivity to Hsp90 Inhibitors. Cell Rep. 14, 872–884 (2016).
Nitika, Porter, C. M., Truman, A. W. & Truttmann, M. C. Post-translational modifications of Hsp70 family proteins: expanding the chaperone code. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 10689–10708 (2020).
Backe, S. J., Sager, R. A., Woodford, M. R., Makedon, A. M. & Mollapour, M. Post-translational modifications of Hsp90 and translating the chaperone code. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 11099–11117 (2020).
Kurokawa Y. et al. kuro. Ann. Oncol. 33, 959–967 (2022).
Kamal, A. et al. A high-affinity conformation of Hsp90 confers tumour selectivity on Hsp90 inhibitors. Nature 425, 407–410 (2003).
Pillarsetty, N. et al. Paradigms for precision medicine in epichaperome cancer therapy. Cancer Cell 36, 559–573.e557 (2019).
Trepel, J., Mollapour, M., Giaccone, G. & Neckers, L. Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 537–549 (2010).
Longshaw, V. M., Dirr, H. W., Blatch, G. L. & Lassle, M. The in vitro phosphorylation of the co-chaperone mSTI1 by cell cycle kinases substantiates a predicted casein kinase II-p34cdc2-NLS (CcN) motif. Biol. Chem. 381, 1133–1138 (2000).
Dunn, D. M. et al. c-Abl mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of Aha1 activates its co-chaperone function in cancer cells. Cell Rep. 12, 1006–1018 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01GM139932 (D.B.) and R35GM139584 (M.M.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.B. drew the figure, and M.R.W., D.B. and M.M. wrote the comment.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Woodford, M.R., Bourboulia, D. & Mollapour, M. Epichaperomics reveals dysfunctional chaperone protein networks. Nat Commun 14, 5084 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40713-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40713-z