Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21146-y, published online 08 February 2021

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 4b, in which patient 4 was incorrectly labelled as Patient 3. The correct version of Fig. 4b is:

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.