Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12536-4, published online 24 October 2019

The original version of this Article contained an error in Table 1, in which the odds ratios were incorrectly calculated. The correct version of Table 1 is:

Table 1 Overview of lead SNPs with significant associations at 29 independent loci in UL GWAS meta-analysis

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

Table 1 Overview of lead SNPs with significant associations at 29 independent loci in UL GWAS meta-analysis

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.