Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Electrical manipulation of skyrmions in a chiral magnet


Writing, erasing and computing are three fundamental operations required by any working electronic device. Magnetic skyrmions could be essential bits in promising in emerging topological spintronic devices. In particular, skyrmions in chiral magnets have outstanding properties like compact texture, uniform size, and high mobility. However, creating, deleting, and driving isolated skyrmions, as prototypes of aforementioned basic operations, have been a grand challenge in chiral magnets ever since the discovery of skyrmions, and achieving all these three operations in a single device is even more challenging. Here, by engineering chiral magnet Co8Zn10Mn2 into the customized micro-devices for in-situ Lorentz transmission electron microscopy observations, we implement these three operations of skyrmions using nanosecond current pulses with a low current density of about 1010 A·m2 at room temperature. A notched structure can create or delete magnetic skyrmions depending on the direction and magnitude of current pulses. We further show that the magnetic skyrmions can be deterministically shifted step-by-step by current pulses, allowing the establishment of the universal current-velocity relationship. These experimental results have immediate significance towards the skyrmion-based memory or logic devices.


The skyrmion lattice, a new magneto-crystalline order composed of topologically stable nanometer-sized magnetic whirls, was discovered in a chiral magnet MnSi a decade ago1,2. One year later, subsequent experiments showed that the skyrmion lattice could be driven to motion using direct currents (DC) at an ultra-low current density3,4. This prominent feature, together with its topological stability and small size, opens the door to skyrmion-based spintronic devices5, such as racetrack memory6, logic devices7, and neuromorphic computation8,9. However, from the technological point of view, the controllable creation, deletion, and motion of isolated skyrmions10,11,12, rather than skyrmion lattices, using nanosecond current pulses are of critical significance in practical applications11,13,14. These operations of the Néel skyrmions induced by the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction15 (DMI) have been demonstrated in heterostructures using the spin-orbit torque (SOT)13,14,16,17,18,19,20. However, the same operations of skyrmions using spin-transfer-torque (STT) in bulk chiral magnets have progressed very slowly in the past decade. In contrast to the magnetic thin films, the main challenge is fabricating high-quality microdevices from bulk samples for in-situ magnetic imaging. Very few experiments of electrical manipulation of isolated skyrmions12,21 have been reported, but long and wide current pulses (milliseconds) had to be used.

Here, we present systematic experiments on the STT-induced creation, deletion, and motion of magnetic skyrmions in chiral magnet Co8Zn10Mn222 at room temperature. Under a relatively low current density, the creation and deletion of isolated skyrmion have been realized via a geometrical notch at the device edge. Moreover, the universal current-velocity relation of skyrmions motions is established, and a combined operation of creation, motion, and deletion is implemented.


Skyrmions creation and deletion with a Notch

We first demonstrate the current induced skyrmion creation using a notch at the sample boundary23. The fabricated micro-device24 comprises two Pt electrodes and a thin lamella with a thickness of 150 nm (see Methods, Supplementary Fig. S1 and Movie 1). A \(190\times 280\) nm2 notch is specifically designed to serve as a nucleation seed for creating skyrmions using current. The notch width of ~190 nm is comparable to the period of the spin helix (L 114 nm)25, much smaller than that reported in a recent FeGe-based device12, making the creation of a single skyrmion possible.

Figure 1a shows the snapshots of the skyrmion creation process after applying a sequence of current pulses with the width of 20 ns and current density of \(-4.26\times {10}^{10}{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\) in the x-direction (see the details in Supplementary Movie 2). Initially, the sample is in the conical state under the external field B of 70 mT. After applying two pulses, one skyrmion with a topological charge of \(Q=-1\) is created. The created skyrmion is attached to the notch, indicating the attractive interaction between the skyrmion and the notch. Further application of current pulses continuously creates skyrmions one-by-one till the end of the 12th pulse (Fig. 1b). After that, it occasionally happens that no skyrmion is created under a few applications of current pulses. Nevertheless, the linear relationship between the number of created skyrmion and applied pulses is well identified (Fig. 1b and see also Supplementary Fig. S2 for other datasets). At last, a skyrmion cluster composed of 19 skyrmions is created after the 21st pulse. It stretches into a ribbon-like shape due to the skyrmion Hall effect16,19,26.

Fig. 1: Skyrmion creation with a notch.
figure 1

a A sequence of Lorentz TEM images of the skyrmion creation process after applying designated numbers of current pulses. After the 2nd, 6th, and 21st pulse, the created skyrmions are 1, 5, and 19, respectively. The depth and width of the notch are 280 nm and 190 nm, respectively. The orange circle highlights a skyrmion at the corner. b The number of created skyrmions as a function of pulse numbers. Inset: Schematic plots of the experimental setup (upper left) and a magnetic skyrmion (lower right). c The average numbers of created skyrmions per current pulse as a function of current density. The creation rate is asymmetric with respect to the current direction, especially in the STT-dominated region. The scale bar in (a) is 400 nm. d Unidirectional skyrmion creation in the STT-dominated regime. Skyrmions with the topological charge of Q = −1 (Q = +1) are created on the right (left) side of the notch under a negative (positive) j and a positive (negative) external field B. No skyrmion is created under the combinations \(j \, > \, 0\), B > 0, and \(j \, < \, 0,{B} \, < \, 0\). The unidirectional skyrmion creation originates from the unique direction of the spin precession that breaks the reflection symmetry. \(\odot\) and .. stand for the upward and outward directions of the external magnetic field, respectively. The amplitude of the magnetic field is B = 70 mT, and the current density is \({{{{{\rm{|}}}}}}j{{{{{\rm{|}}}}}}=4.26\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\) and pulse width 20 ns.

The spin textures of the notch play an essential role in creating the skyrmions. The notch has a sizeable in-plane magnetization component that is perpendicular to the direction of electrical current, while it is parallel at the normal edges. Under the electrical current, the spin textures could swell out and then nucleate a skyrmion due to the STT, but absent at the regular edges (Supplementary Fig. S3). Therefore, the skyrmion nucleation energy is lower at the notch than the “normal” sample edges.

The effect of the current pulse magnitude and direction on the skyrmion creation is summarized in Fig. 1c, where the parameter <Ns> represents the average number of created skyrmions per current pulse. Under a negative current pulse, the threshold current density for the skyrmion creation is approximate \(-3.4\times {10}^{10}{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\), which is one order of magnitude smaller than the theoretical estimation23. On the contrary, a positive current with the same current density failed to create skyrmions (Fig. 1d), indicating the asymmetric STT effects with regard to the current direction23. This asymmetry of STT-induced skyrmion creation originates from the breakdown of reflection symmetry due to the unique direction of the spin precession23. Consequently, skyrmions with Q = +1 could only be created with a positive current and a negative field (Fig. 1d). The thermal effect starts to dominate the creation process when the current density exceeds \(5\times {10}^{10}{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\). After that, the Joule heating becomes increasingly prominent. The ultrafast field-warming beyond the Tc and then field-cooling process results in the creation of skyrmions27,28. As a result, the unidirectionality is weakened (Supplementary Movie 3) and <Ns> rapidly increases (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. S4).

The unidirectionality of skyrmion creation with the notch allows us to delete the skyrmion by using its inverse process. Figure 2a shows the representative Lorentz-TEM images of an Ns = 15 skyrmion cluster after successive applications of negative current pulses under \(j \sim 4.06\times {10}^{10}{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\) and B ~ 70 mT (see the details in Supplementary Movie 4). Once the positive current pulses are applied, the number of skyrmions \({N}_{s}\) decrease quickly with the increase of pulse number. Finally, only one skyrmion is left. It is attached to the edge owing to the attractive interaction between skyrmion and the edge29, which is different from the two-dimensional system where the boundary twist owing to DMI induces a repulsive potential to skyrmions.

Fig. 2: Skyrmion annihilation with a notch.
figure 2

a A skyrmion cluster is pushed towards the notch using current pulses and absorbed by the notch gradually. The snapshots were taken under the defocus of 1 mm. The external field B = 70 mT, the pulse width is 20 ns and current density is \(4.06\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\). b The number of skyrmions \({N}_{s}\) decreases as the current pulses are applied to the system. c The average number of erased skyrmion per pulse as a function of current density.

The number of remaining skyrmions as a function of current pulses is shown in Fig. 2b. The average number of deleted skyrmions per pulse depends on the strength of current density, as shown in Fig. 2c. The deletion rate increases with the current density (Supplementary Fig. S5) and reaches its maximum at \(j \sim 3.65\times {10}^{10}{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\). Note that the threshold current density required to delete skyrmions is much smaller than that to create skyrmions, although it appears to be the inverse process of the latter. It can be attributed to the asymmetric energy landscape between the conical state and the skyrmion state. The energy barrier of skyrmion deletion is smaller than that of skyrmion creation30. In principle, a flat edge should also absorb skyrmions due to the inevitable skyrmion Hall effect under large current density16. However, it did not occur even at \(j \sim 4.06\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\) (Supplementary Fig. S6), indicating the crucial role of the rectangular notch.

Skyrmions motion by current

We now turn to the motion of skyrmions driven by STT. The universal current-velocity relation of skyrmion dynamics under STT has been theoretically addressed31. The longitudinal velocity of a skyrmion is derived as \({v}_{x}\approx -b\,j\) under the electrical current, where b is a constant and \(j\) is the current density (see Supplementary Note I). The experimental results of the nanosecond-pulse-driven skyrmions motion are summarized in Figs. 35 with varied skyrmion numbers. For Q = −1, the skyrmion moves along the \(+x\) direction under a negative current with pulse width of 80 ns and \(j \sim -3.48\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\) (Supplementary Movie 5 for \(j \sim -2\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\)). The transverse motion along the \(+y\) direction, i.e., skyrmion Hall effect (quantified as \(\tan {\theta }_{h}={v}_{y}/{v}_{x}\)) is observed, as depicted in Fig. 3a. The trajectory (Fig. 3e) shows approximately linear behavior as predicted in theory. The pinning effect and thermal fluctuation can reasonably explain the deviation from the linearity. The longitudinal velocity \({v}_{x}\) is always antiparallel to the current flow while the transverse velocity \({v}_{y}\) is related to the topological charge Q (Supplementary Note I and Fig. 3). Therefore, the magnetic skyrmion moves in the opposite direction when a positive current is applied, and a reversal sign of Q only changes the direction of velocity \({v}_{y}\) (Fig. 3b, d).

Fig. 3: Lorentz TEM imaging of a single skyrmion motion driven by current pulses.
figure 3

a A single skyrmion with \(Q=-1\) moves forward with a negative \(j \, < \, 0\). b The reversal motion of skyrmion with \(Q=-1\) at \(j \, > \, 0\). c A single skyrmion with \(Q=+1\) moves forward at \(j \, < \, 0.\) d The reversal motion of skyrmion with \(Q=+1\) at \(j \, > \, 0\). The corresponding trajectories of the skyrmion motion are shown in (eh). The fitted lines are shown to guide the eyes. The nonzero transverse motion in the +y direction is characterized by the skyrmion Hall angle, which depends on the skyrmion number while not the current direction. A negative (positive) Q is determined by the positive (negative) magnetic field at B = 94 mT. The current density is \({|j|}=3.48\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\) and the pulse width is 80 ns. The scale bars are 300 nm.

Fig. 4: Spin transfer torque induced skyrmion clusters motion.
figure 4

The sequences of images in (a) and (b) show the positions of skyrmions after applying the negative current pulses where the duration of each pulse is 80 ns, and the current density is \(-2\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\). a A skyrmion cluster with \({N}_{s}=4\). b A skyrmion cluster with \({N}_{s}=26\). The corresponding trajectories of the skyrmion center are shown in (c and d) and fit well to straight lines. The negative pulses lead to positive displacements in the +x direction independent of the skyrmion number. The skyrmion Hall angle characterizes the nonzero transverse motion in the +y direction \({\theta }_{{{{{{\rm{h}}}}}}}\) which depends on the skyrmion number and is unrelated to the current direction. The amplitude of the external field B is 117 mT. e The skyrmion velocity as a function of the current density. The x-component velocity scales linearly with the current density. f The skyrmion Hall angle \({\theta }_{{{{{{\rm{h}}}}}}}\) as a function of current density.

Fig. 5: Electrically manipulation of a skyrmion cluster: a combination of creation, motion, and deletion.
figure 5

a The snapshots of the skyrmion cluster on different stages. The skyrmion cluster is created in the first stage () and moves forward in the second stage (). Then, the skyrmion is pushed back in the third stage () and is finally deleted in the fourth stage (). b The details of the current pulses and the number of skyrmions as a function of pulse number are plotted. The current densities used on these four stages are \(-4.87\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\), \(-2.03\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\), \(2.03\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\) and \(3.65\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\), respectively.

The current-driven skyrmions motion can also be observed in skyrmion cluster states (Fig.4). Figure 4ab show the collective motion of skyrmion clusters with \({N}_{s}=4\) and \({N}_{s}=26\), respectively. Both the velocity and skyrmion Hall angle are similar to those of the single skyrmion, which is because the shape factor \(\eta\) of a cluster scales linearly with \({N}_{s}\) (see Supplementary Note I). However, the trajectories’ deviation from straight lines is significantly suppressed with the increased number of skyrmions in the cluster states (Supplementary Fig. S7). The collective motions of two skyrmion clusters are possible, as shown in Supplementary Fig. S8 with \({N}_{s}=11\) and \({N}_{s}=21\), where the distance between the two clusters remains constant during the motion. Interestingly, the skyrmion clusters can even steadily pass through a defect without noticeable deformation (Supplementary Fig. S8 and Movie 6).

Based on the trajectories of magnetic skyrmions under varied current densities, the current-density-dependent skyrmion velocities are summarized in Fig. 3e. To minimize the uncertainty, skyrmion clusters with the number of \({N}_{s} \sim 20\) is selected therein. The predicted linear relationship32 between the skyrmion velocity and current density is obtained. Moreover, the estimated spin polarization of current for Co8Zn10Mn2 is P 0.57 (see Methods), which is two times larger than that for FeGe12 (P 0.27), resulting in a comparable efficiency (defined as \({\varepsilon =v}_{x}/j\)) to the reported record using SOT mechanism13,16. Below a low critical current density \({j}_{c1}=1.0\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\), magnetic skyrmions are static. This critical current density is directly related to the pinning forces arising from the disorder or impurity32. In addition, the critical current density depends on the pulse width as well. It decays exponentially with respect to the pulse width and reduces to \(\sim 5\times {10}^{9}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\) at the pulse width of 200 ns (Supplementary Fig. S9). Above the critical density \({j}_{c2}=3.5\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\), skyrmions are dynamically created and annihilated due to the combined effect of STT and the Joule heating by current pulses27.

Figure 3f depicts an inverse relationship between the skyrmion Hall angle (\({\theta }_{{{{{{\rm{h}}}}}}}\)) and the current density. In a defect-free system, the skyrmion Hall angle \({\theta }_{{{{{{\rm{h}}}}}}}\) should be constant. However, in natural materials, the defects-induced pinning force will give rise to a transverse motion of magnetic skyrmions, yielding an extrinsic skyrmion Hall effect32 (Supplementary Note I and Supplementary Fig. S10). At low current density, a low drift velocity increases the scattering rate and thus results in a large skyrmion Hall angle (Supplementary Fig. S11 and Supplementary Movie 7). At higher current density, the scattering rate decreases, and the observed skyrmion Hall angle is close to the intrinsic value \({\theta }_{h}\), which is as low as 15º. Our results are quite different from previous studies in magnetic multilayers16,33,34, where the skyrmion Hall angle shows a complicated relationship with current density. The underlying reason is that the skyrmion Hall angle therein is particularly susceptible to the change of radius under magnetic field and the deformation of the spin texture in the motion.

Integrated operations of skyrmions

At last, we demonstrate a combination of all creation, motion, and deletion operations on a single device shown in Fig. 4 (see the details in Supplementary Movie 8 and Supplementary Fig. S12 for other datasets). In the first stage, a skyrmion cluster with ten skyrmions is created with the pulse width of 20 ns and \(j \sim -4.86\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\) as shown in Fig. 4a. In the second stage, the skyrmion cluster is displaced by 680 nm after five pulses with the pulse width of 60 ns and \(j \sim -2.03\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\). After that, the skyrmion cluster is pulled back with the pulse width of 60 ns at \(j \sim 2.03\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\). In the final stage, the skyrmion cluster is deleted eventually with the pulse width of 20 ns at j = \(3.65\times {10}^{10}\,{{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-2}\).

In this work, we show a proof-of-concept demonstration of necessary operations for skyrmion-based memory. In our experiments, this achievement of skyrmion creation, motion, and deletion at room temperature enable the chiral magnets as a unique platform for skyrmion-based spintronic devices. Additionally, chiral magnets allow the coexistence of other exotic particle-like magnetic objects such as bobbers35 and hopfions36,37, making the versatile spintronic devices38 based on three-dimensional spin textures possible.


Preparation of Co8Zn10Mn2 crystals

Polycrystalline samples of Co8Zn10Mn2 crystals were synthesized by a high-temperature reaction method. Stoichiometric amounts of cobalt (Alfa Aesar, purity > 99.9%), zinc (Alfa Aesar, purity > 99.99%), and manganese (Alfa Aesar, purity > 99.95%) were loaded into a pure quartz tube and sealed under vacuum, heated to 1273 K for 24 h, followed by a slow cooling down to 1198 K, and then kept at this temperature for more than three days. After that, the tube was quenched into cold water. Finally, a ball-shaped Co8Zn10Mn2 alloy with a metallic luster was obtained.

Fabrication of Co8Zn10Mn2 micro-devices

The Co8Zn10Mn2 micro-devices suitable for TEM observation are fabricated from a polycrystal Co8Zn10Mn2 alloy using the focus ion beam (FIB) dual-beam system (Helios NanoLab 600i; FEI) equipped with GIS and Omniprobe 200+ micromanipulator. A customized electrical chip with four Au electrodes was self-designed for the in-situ Lorentz transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiment. The electrical TEM micro-devices are fabricated based on the conventional FIB lift-out method. The detailed procedures can be found in Supplementary Fig. S1 and Movie 1.

Estimation of effective spin polarization for Co8Zn10Mn2 and FeGe

The effective spin polarization of current is established using the relation between the measured skyrmion velocity and the current density. Using the fitted slope \(\left.b=1.18\times {10}^{-10}\,{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{3}\cdot {{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}}^{-1}\cdot {{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{-1}\right)\) and the estimated \({M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}=2.78\times {10}^{5}{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-1}\) for Co8Zn10Mn2 at 300K, the spin polarization of Co8Zn10Mn2 is estimated with \({{{{{\rm{P}}}}}}\approx 2e{M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}b/g{{{{{{\rm{\mu }}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{B}}}}}}}\approx 0.57\). Similarly, the effective polarization for FeGe can be established as P 0.27 using \({M}_{{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}=3.84\times {10}^{5}{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{-1}\) and \(b=4\times {10}^{-11}\,{{{{{{\rm{m}}}}}}}^{3}\cdot {{{{{{\rm{A}}}}}}}^{-1}\cdot {{{{{{\rm{s}}}}}}}^{-1},\) which is extracted from Fig. 3a in Ref. 12.

Data availability

The data that support the plots provided in this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu, X. Z. et al. Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature 465, 901–904 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jonietz, F. et al. Spin Transfer Torques in MnSi at ultralow current densities. Science 330, 1648–1651 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schulz, T. et al. Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet. Nat. Phys. 8, 301–304 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V. Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17031 (2017).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fert, A., Cros, V. & Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 152–156 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, X., Ezawa, M. & Zhou, Y. Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions. Sci. Rep. 5, 9400 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Song, K. M. et al. Skyrmion-based artificial synapses for neuromorphic computing. Nat. Electron. 3, 148–155 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grollier, J. et al. Neuromorphic spintronics. Nat. Electron. 3, 360–370 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Romming, N. et al. Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions. Science 341, 636–639 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sampaio, J., Cros, V., Rohart, S., Thiaville, A. & Fert, A. Nucleation, stability and current-induced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 839–844 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu, X. Z. et al. Motion tracking of 80-nm-size skyrmions upon directional current injections. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz9744 (2020).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Woo, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 15, 501–506 (2016).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Legrand, W. et al. Room-temperature current-induced generation and motion of sub-100 nm skyrmions. Nano Lett. 17, 2703–2712 (2017).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rohart, S. & Thiaville, A. Skyrmion confinement in ultrathin film nanostructures in the presence of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Phys. Rev. B 88, 184422 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang, W. et al. Direct observation of the skyrmion Hall effect. Nat. Phys. 13, 162–169 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang, W. et al. Blowing magnetic skyrmion bubbles. Science 349, 283–286 (2015).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Büttner, F. et al. Field-free deterministic ultrafast creation of magnetic skyrmions by spin–orbit torques. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1040–1044 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Litzius, K. et al. Skyrmion Hall effect revealed by direct time-resolved X-ray microscopy. Nat. Phys. 13, 170–175 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu, G. et al. Room-temperature skyrmion shift device for memory application. Nano Lett. 17, 261–268 (2017).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu, X. et al. Current-induced nucleation and annihilation of magnetic skyrmions at room temperature in a chiral magnet. Adv. Mater 6, (2017).

  22. Tokunaga, Y. et al. A new class of chiral materials hosting magnetic skyrmions beyond room temperature. Nat. Commun. 6, 7638 (2015).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Iwasaki, J., Mochizuki, M. & Nagaosa, N. Current-induced skyrmion dynamics in constricted geometries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 742–747 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang, J. et al. Magnetic skyrmion bundles and their current-driven dynamics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1086–1091 (2021).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu, X. Z. et al. Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet. Nature 564, 95–98 (2018).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zang, J., Mostovoy, M., Han, J. H. & Nagaosa, N. Dynamics of skyrmion crystals in metallic thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 136804 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, X., Wang, S., Wang, C. & Che, R. Thermal effects on current-related skyrmion formation in a nanobelt. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 212403 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lemesh, I. et al. Current-induced skyrmion generation through morphological thermal transitions in chiral ferromagnetic heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 30, 1805461 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Du, H. et al. Interaction of individual skyrmions in a nanostructured cubic chiral magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 197203 (2018).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, X. et al. Skyrmion-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge repulsions in skyrmion-based racetrack memory. Sci. Rep. 5, 7643 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Everschor, K. et al. Rotating skyrmion lattices by spin torques and field or temperature gradients. Phys. Rev. B 86, 054432 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Iwasaki, J., Mochizuki, M. & Nagaosa, N. Universal current-velocity relation of skyrmion motion in chiral magnets. Nat. Commun. 4, 1463 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeissler, K. et al. Diameter-independent skyrmion Hall angle observed in chiral magnetic multilayers. Nat. Commun. 11, 428 (2020).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Woo, S. et al. Spin-orbit torque-driven skyrmion dynamics revealed by time-resolved X-ray microscopy. Nat. Commun. 8, 15573 (2017).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng, F. et al. Experimental observation of chiral magnetic bobbers in B20-type FeGe. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 451–455 (2018).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, X. S., Qaiumzadeh, A. & Brataas, A. Current-driven dynamics of magnetic hopfions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 147203 (2019).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, Y., Hou, W., Han, X. & Zang, J. Three-dimensional dynamics of a magnetic hopfion driven by spin transfer torque. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 127204 (2020).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fernandez-Pacheco, A. et al. Three-dimensional nanomagnetism. Nat. Commun. 8, 15756 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


H.D. acknowledges the financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China, Grant No. 2017YFA0303201; the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XDB33030100; and the Equipment Development Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. YJKYYQ20180012; the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS No. 2015267; J.Z. was supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, U.S. Department of Energy, under Award No. DE-SC0020221, and also supported by Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; D.S. acknowledges the financial support from the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (52173215), the National Natural Science Fund for Excellent Young Scientists Fund Program (Overseas) and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province for Excellent Young Scientist (2108085Y03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



H.D. supervised the project. J.Z. conceived the theory. W.W., D.S., P.N., and H.D. conceived the experiments. W.-S.W. synthesized Co8Zn10Mn2 crystals. W.W., D.S., H.D., and J.Z. prepared the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dongsheng Song, Jiadong Zang or Haifeng Du.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, W., Song, D., Wei, W. et al. Electrical manipulation of skyrmions in a chiral magnet. Nat Commun 13, 1593 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing