replying to B. Holder et al. Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26437-y (2021)
The Matters Arising article from Holder et al. argues that the finding of carbon particles reaching the fetal side of the human placenta is based on anatomical misinterpretation and that we identified its presence mainly in the trophoblast layer of the placental villous tissue. Instead, Holder et al. presume the location of carbon particles being in the placental villous tissue, more specifically, the trophoblast layer. Their concerns are primarily based on the use of the term “fetal side of the placenta”, which can be defined as (i) the sample collection site of the fetal biopsy, namely at the placental side facing the fetus or (ii) the anatomical site that is in direct contact with the fetal circulation (i.e., fetal capillaries). Whereas we used the terms “fetal and maternal side” of the placenta to define our biopsies as done in several previous studies1,2,3,4,5, we agree that there is no unambiguous boundary between the fetal and maternal side of the placenta being separated by the intervillous space and that more conventional terms (e.g., the basal and chorionic plate, respectively) should be used for future reference to avoid possible confusion. Although full macro- and microscopic analysis of the placental structure and particle localization was outside the scope of our paper, which aimed to look for the presence of carbonaceous particles from ambient exposure in the placenta per se, we have further evidence for the presence of carbon particles in fetal microvessels (vide infra). Hence, our claim that carbon particles reach the fetal side of the human placenta is valid irrespective of the used definition for the term “fetal side of the placenta”.
We first wish to further clarify how we carried out the two types of biopsies. As referred to in our “Methods” section, a detailed description of the placental biopsy sampling is provided in the ENVIRonmental influence ON AGEing in early life (ENVIRONAGE) birth cohort profile6. The fetal-sided biopsies were collected from four-quadrant chorionic villous tissue sampling sites, ~4 cm away from the umbilical cord insertion. The order of the four biopsies is clockwise starting at the main blood vessel. The maternally sided biopsy is taken at the basal side of the placenta at an equivalent position of biopsy 1. The basal plate is known to contain both cells of fetal (e.g., villous-lining syncytiotrophoblast) and maternal (e.g., polygonal decidual cells) origin, as also shown in Fig. 1. In our paper, and in general our birth cohort, we follow generally accepted methods for biopsy sampling and associated terminology1,2,3,4,5.
Cellular composition of the placenta
Trophoblast cells constitute the placenta’s key cellular layer, which serves as a physical barrier to protect the fetus. In this regard, preferential uptake and accumulation of nanosized particles (e.g., polystyrene7 and gold8 nanoparticles) in the syncytiotrophoblast layer have been previously described. Our published images not only show the presence of carbon particles in the syncytiotrophoblast but also in the stroma of the villous placental tissue indicating that few particles can bypass the outermost cellular layer. Our paper sought to investigate whether combustion-derived particles are present in placental tissue and whether the placental black carbon load is related to ambient residential black carbon exposure during gestation. Overview images rather than detailed high resolution and high magnification images (using, for example, electron microscopy) were collected to analyze sufficiently large tissue areas for the presence of carbon particles and shown as such as being representative for the placental black carbon load as used in our performed quantitative analysis.
According to Holder et al., to demonstrate particle transfer across the placental barrier to the fetus, it needs to be established that particles (i) have crossed the syncytiotrophoblast and particles are present within the villous stroma and/or (ii) are localized in the endothelium of fetal blood vessels substantiated by co-localization of cell lineage-specific markers. First of all, carbon particles can be identified within the villous stroma of the placenta as already shown in the published images (Fig. 2, original manuscript). Second, we now show the transfer of air pollution-derived particles towards the fetal circulation by identifying black carbon particles in the central core of the chorionic villous tissue, more specifically inside the fetal capillaries, as visualized in Fig. 2. Also, our findings are further supported by a recent study by Liu et al. describing the uptake of inhaled air pollution-derived particles by macrophage-enriched placental cells isolated from healthy post-term placentae suggesting possible fetal transfer of such pollution-sourced nanoparticles9.
In summary, we unequivocally confirm our main conclusion that black carbon particles from environmental exposure reach the fetal side of the human placenta. However, we agree with Holder and colleagues that our findings, although in line with recent independent observations by other colleagues (e.g., presence of air pollution particles in placental tissue cells observed by Liu et al.9), require further research to understand direct fetal exposure more precisely. In this regard, we are currently studying the presence of particles in umbilical cord blood and its connection with the placental black carbon load. To use the words of Holder et al., “only by sufficiently rigorous scientific and technical approach can we reliably advance understanding of the environmental determinants of pregnancy outcome and offspring health”. By demonstrating, for the first time ever, the presence of black carbon particles in the human placenta, we contributed reliably to the understanding of possible particle translocation towards the fetus and insights into preventable adverse health effects that could potentially harm the next generation.
Masson’s Trichrome was performed to assess the macroscopic structure of the placenta. The stained sections were visualized using a light microscope (Nikon SMZ800, Nikon Corporation, Japan) and acquired using a digital camera (Nikon Cs-Ri2, Nikon Corporation, Japan). Cellular distribution of black carbon particles in placental tissue sections was evaluated by staining endothelial cells. This experiment was performed in triplicate and representative images are shown. For marker expression analysis, 4-µm-thick placental paraffin sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a graded ethanol series and PBS. Next, the sections were submerged in a citrate buffer solution (10 mM, pH 6.0) for 40 min at 97 °C for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by immersing the sections in 0.3% H2O2 in PBS for 10 min. After blocking non-specific binding sites with protein block (X0909, Agilent Dako, USA) for 60 min, tissue sections were probed with mouse monoclonal antibody against human CD31 (1:100, M0823, Agilent, USA) overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the tissue sections were incubated with an Alexa Fluor® 555 conjugated goat-anti mouse secondary antibody (1:500, A2122, Invitrogen, USA). The antibody was diluted in 10% protein block/PBS. SYTOTM 61 Red (1:1000, S11343, Invitrogen, USA) was used as a nuclear counterstain. Images with a 512 × 512-pixel resolution of stained tissue sections were collected at room temperature using a Zeiss LSM 880 (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and a Plan-Apochromat ×20/0.8 (Carl Zeiss, Germany) objective at a 4.1 µs pixel dwell time. The Alexa Fluor® 555-labeled endothelial cells and SYTOTM 61 Red-labeled nuclei were excited by using a 0.64 mW 543 He–Ne laser and a 5 mW 633 He–Ne laser, respectively. Band-pass filters 490–600 and 650–750 nm were used for filtering the emission signal from the labeled placental cells and nuclei, respectively. A femtosecond pulsed laser (810 nm, 150 fs, 80 MHz, MaiTai DeepSee, Spectra-Physics, USA) tuned to a central wavelength of 810 nm was used to excite the black carbon particles. Two-photon induced white-light emission of the carbon particles was acquired in the non-descanned mode after spectral separation and emission filtering using 400–410 and 450–650 nm band-pass filters. Thresholded and overlapping pixels in the narrow second harmonic generation channel (405/10 nm) and the broader two-photon excited autofluorescence channel (550/200 nm) were confirmed to be black carbon particles. The images were acquired by ZEN Black 2.0 software (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Adibi, J. J. et al. Placental biomarkers of phthalate effects on mRNA transcription: application in epidemiologic research. Environ. Health 8, 20 (2009).
Roberts, V. H. et al. A standardized method for collection of human placenta samples in the age of functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biotechniques 67, 45–49 (2019).
Gaccioli, F., Lager, S., Sovio, U., Charnock-Jones, D. S. & Smith, G. C. S. The pregnancy outcome prediction (POP) study: investigating the relationship between serial prenatal ultrasonography, biomarkers, placental phenotype and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Placenta 59, S17–S25 (2017).
Lauder, A. P. et al. Comparison of placenta samples with contamination controls does not provide evidence for a distinct placenta microbiota. Microbiome 4, 29 (2016).
Vilahur, N. et al. Storage conditions and stability of global DNA methylation in placental tissue. Epigenomics 5, 341–348 (2013).
Janssen, B. G. et al. Cohort Profile: The ENVIRonmental influence ON early AGEing (ENVIRONAGE): a birth cohort study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, 1386–1387m (2017).
Grafmueller, S. et al. Bidirectional transfer study of polystyrene nanoparticles across the placental barrier in an ex vivo human placental perfusion model. Environ. Health Perspect. 123, 1280–1286 (2015).
Aengenheister, L. et al. Gold nanoparticle distribution in advanced in vitro and ex vivo human placental barrier models. J. Nanobiotechnology 16, 79 (2018).
Liu, N. M. et al. Evidence for the presence of air pollution nanoparticles in placental tissue cells. Sci. Total Environ. 751, 142235 (2021).
H.B., M.B.J.R., M.A. and T.S.N. declare competing financial interests: Aspects of the work mentioned in the paper are the subject of a patent application (method for detecting or quantifying carbon black and/or black carbon particles, US20190025215A1) filed by Hasselt University (Hasselt, Belgium) and KU Leuven (Leuven, Belgium). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bongaerts, E., Bové, H., Lambrichts, I. et al. Reply to ‘Fetal side’ of the placenta: Anatomical mis-annotation of carbon particle ‘transfer’ across the human placenta. Nat Commun 12, 7050 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26438-x
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.