Outdoor air pollution contributes to millions of deaths worldwide yet air pollution has differential exposures across racial/ethnic groups and socioeconomic status. While green infrastructure has the potential to decrease air pollution and provide other benefits to human health, vegetation alone cannot resolve health disparities related to air pollution injustice. We discuss how unequal access to green infrastructure can limit air quality improvements for marginalized communities and provide strategies to move forward.
Outdoor air pollution is a leading contributor to the environmental burden of disease and linked to over four million deaths worldwide each year1. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that almost half of cities with more than 100,000 residents, and most (97%) cities in low- and middle-income countries of that size, do not meet WHO air quality guidelines2. From 1960 to 2009, global levels of fine particulate matter increased by 38% leading to a greater health burden from polluted air3. Even in the midst of the current pandemic, evidence of higher COVID-19 deaths among people with pre-existing conditions was linked to elevated air pollution exposure4,5 and/or residing in areas with historically higher levels of air pollution6. Exposure to air pollution, however, is not evenly distributed, especially within cities. Many studies document differential exposure to air pollution by race/ethnicity7,8 and socio-economic status8,9,10 in cities across the world. Neighborhoods segregated by race and class often have less political and economic power, and are often neglected by government institutions such that they receive fewer resources compared to privileged communities11. This predicament results in disproportionate and overlapping exposures to environmental burdens11. Through the years, some approaches to decrease outdoor pollution include regulation of air pollution sources, emission controls on personal vehicles, and—more recently—the expansion of green infrastructure. The expansion of green infrastructure can mitigate urban air pollution to some extent. Yet, urban greening cannot compensate for systemic injustices that lead to disproportionate burdens in environmental health, and therefore, green infrastructure investments need to be balanced with other efforts to ameliorate air pollution injustices.
Green infrastructure for air pollution mitigation
Many cities have explored the potential of green infrastructure to mitigate urban air pollution and studies estimate that the value of this ecosystem service is worth about $3.8 billion dollars in the United States alone12. The definition of green infrastructure varies by discipline and scope. In this article, we focus on the broader role of all urban vegetation that provides ecosystem services via the mitigation of air pollution. For example, roadside green barriers can block the movement of traffic pollution into surrounding communities, mitigating some air pollution exposure and its resulting negative health effects13.
Green infrastructure is one variable that makes up the collective infrastructure that supports city dwellers. While the extent of air pollution removal by green infrastructure can vary14, many researchers note the benefits of green infrastructure to a city’s ambient environment12,15. In some cases, increased tree density and leaf area index are associated with a variety of health benefits including fewer cases of respiratory illness16. The net benefits of green infrastructure, however, should be balanced with their potential to increase pollen and other compounds that contribute to air pollution17. Special attention to tree size, condition, density, and species is also needed to increase a tree’s capacity to provide benefits and decrease disservices14. Although green infrastructure can provide benefits to urban air, urban settings have their own stressors (e.g., compaction, high levels of air pollution) that can impede the ability of green infrastructure to provide ecosystem services. For example, factors such as meteorology, mixture of air pollution, and urban layout can affect the ability of green infrastructure to remove air pollution18. Along with ecosystem services related to air pollution removal, mounting studies document various physical and mental health benefits related to green spaces19,20,21,22,23. Green infrastructure in the form of parks, street trees, and other urban vegetation can also buffer against health disparities for conditions such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, psychological distress, and heat-related illness24.
Unequal access to green infrastructure
While there is ample evidence for health benefits of vegetation, widespread inequities in urban vegetation by race and income25,26 prompt concerns of limited ecosystem services from green infrastructure in marginalized communities around the world. For example, findings of disparate access to green infrastructure are documented in parts of Canada27, South Africa28,29, the United Kingdom30, China31, and Colombia32. Many underlying drivers (e.g., exclusionary practices) that result in unequal exposure to environmental burdens reflect factors that also lead to unequal access to green infrastructure33. Systemic racism prompted practices such as residential segregation in various locations34. Residential segregation can force racial and ethnic populations to be located in areas with limited resources, greater community stressors, and exposure to pollutants that contribute to environmental health disparities35. To illustrate, the report ‘Toxic Waste and Race at Twenty,’ found that race continues to be the most important factor determining hazardous waste facility siting in the U.S36. Also, scholars describe how the legacy of apartheid and segregation negatively influenced the availability and access to urban green infrastructure in South Africa today29. Another example of this was redlining—a discriminatory mortgage appraisal process that began in the 1930s in the U.S36—which has been linked to disparate air pollution exposures34, health disparities37, and inequitable access to green infrastructure36,38. For example, Schell et al.34 describes how redlined neighborhoods have on average twenty-one percent less tree canopy compared to other communities. A study in Baltimore, Maryland observed that patterns of residential segregation contributed to the unequal distribution of green infrastructure and greater presence of stressors such as pollution, flooding, and urban heat islands39. Variations of green infrastructure access can also relate to the type of vegetation, urban form, and methodological approach being explored30. Therefore, unequal access to green infrastructure and its ecosystem services can have various implications in environmental health.
Part of the solution, but not a panacea
Given the range of benefits from green infrastructure, more attention should be directed to sustainably increase the presence of and access to it within vulnerable urban communities. We acknowledge, however, that the strategy to reduce air pollution’s inequitable health impacts should not rest solely on the effectiveness of green infrastructure. Multiple systematic and long-lasting processes of discrimination (e.g., inequitable citing of industrial facilities and high traffic roads33,34,35,36,37,38) have resulted in unequal exposure to air pollution. Therefore, one strategy alone cannot solve the associated problems of inequitable exposure to air pollution. Without addressing these persistent and structural factors, green infrastructure can only taper air pollution injustice, without solving it sustainably.
Similar to other environmental perils, air pollution in disadvantaged communities must be mitigated at the source—through regulating pollution emissions equitably and dismantling systems that lead to disproportionate exposures in the first place. Improving management strategies also applies to other sectors of the environmental field. Comparable to the sentiment expressed in Hardin’s Tragedy of the Commons37, underestimating the importance of sustainable stewardship of natural resources will lead to environmental and health burdens. The idea that the social forces that lead to inequitable systems should then govern and allocate the benefits that nature offers perpetuates environmental injustice. For example, developing cities in a way that regards vegetation as merely an aesthetic accessory instead of a key part of its ecological backbone can be detrimental in many ways. On the other hand, increasing natural amenities in disadvantaged communities can result in gentrification if housing protections are not put into place38. Solutions are needed that relieve the burden that air pollution has on public health through green infrastructure while not inducing further harm to environmental justice communities. A key component of this is the comprehensive inclusion of affected communities at all levels of decision-making.
Making green infrastructure work to promote air pollution justice
Given these systemic issues, we suggest that green infrastructure development be partnered with actions to ensure equity and environmental justice. First of all, environmental justice calls for the involvement of diverse residents in environmental decision making. With concerns that urban green space development may lead to population displacement (i.e., green gentrification)39,40 and strains to public health41, re-engaging community members and professionals in this arena is imperative. Surface level involvement of local communities is not sufficient to mitigate such effects25. Therefore, we suggest that community inclusion be placed at the center of green infrastructure development. Also, urban foresters, planners, and dendrologists that participate in green infrastructure projects should be trained in inclusive community engagement to secure beneficial outcomes for residents.
In order for communities to be engaged in air pollution mitigation in a meaningful way, they need access to inventories of emissions data and ambient air quality monitoring in formats that are user-friendly and publicly available. This is essential for affected communities, researchers, and other stakeholders to have accurate data for mitigation measures like green infrastructure. Recognizing that air pollution can negatively impact health at multiple scales, mitigation strategies must note the importance of green infrastructure policies at larger (e.g., regional) geographic levels42. Likewise, infrastructure to monitor air pollution should be refined at smaller geographic scales, such as census block groups or city blocks, that more accurately reflect community demographics. Current regulatory monitoring does not adequately represent disparate air pollution exposures at the community scale, particularly for low-income and communities of color43. Accounting for these challenges relates to quantifying air pollution exposure in different locations44 and understanding spatial patterns of air quality.
While we acknowledge the importance of equal access to green infrastructure, it is crucial to ensure that related professionals uphold ethical practices and dismantle further marginalization. Many organizations have standards related to justice and fair treatment of all people in their mission41,42, but the actual implementation of these standards in green infrastructure projects needs to be evaluated. A code of ethics is shortsighted without objective oversight in place to verify that it is being practiced. Therefore, we suggest more emphasis on how environmental, urban planning, and public health professionals are evaluated on their ethical practices.
In many sectors of society, marginalized people and communities are treated without the value and significance that they inherently possess. To actualize equitable policies on green infrastructure and air pollution, we must honor the moral and ethical tenets of equal protection under our laws (and create those that do not exist). This means reducing pollution exposure and repositioning vulnerable populations to receive ecosystem services. Although scholars have long expressed how systemic racism and disenfranchisement create health disparities45,46, the seeds of inequality planted centuries ago have perpetuated unequal exposure to environmental hazards and access to environmental benefits. Developing green infrastructure projects can bring great benefits to marginalized communities, but cannot on its own solve historical and systemic inequality. In the same way that we invest to protect ecological diversity, we must act to eliminate inequity for marginalized people by effectively partnering nature with all of the people that it supports.
Cohen, A. J. et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 389, 1907–1918 (2017).
WHO. Global Ambient Air Quality Database, https://www.who.int/airpollution/data/cities/en/ (2018).
Butt, E. et al. Global and regional trends in particulate air pollution and attributable health burden over the past 50 years. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 104017 (2017).
Rajagopalan, S., Al-Kindi, S. G. & Brook, R. D. Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 72, 2054–2070 (2018).
Guan, W.-J. et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with Covid-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur. Respir. J. 55, 200547 (2020).
Zhu, Y., Xie, J., Huang, F. & Cao, L. Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 infection: evidence from China. Sci. Total Environ. 727, 138704 (2020).
Clark, L. P., Millet, D. B. & Marshall, J. D. National patterns in environmental injustice and inequality: outdoor NO 2 air pollution in the United States. PloS one 9, e94431 (2014).
Fairburn, J., Schüle, S. A., Dreger, S., Karla Hilz, L. & Bolte, G. Social inequalities in exposure to ambient air pollution: a systematic review in the WHO European Region. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 16, 3127 (2019).
Hajat, A., Hsia, C. & O’Neill, M. S. Socioeconomic disparities and air pollution exposure: a global review. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2, 440–450 (2015).
Dionisio, K. L. et al. Within-neighborhood patterns and sources of particle pollution: mobile monitoring and geographic information system analysis in four communities in Accra, Ghana. Environ. Health Perspect. 118, 607–613 (2010).
Corburn, J. Concepts for studying urban environmental justice. Curr. Environ. health Rep. 4, 61–67 (2017).
Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E. & Stevens, J. C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Urban Gree 4, 115–123 (2006).
Baldauf, R. Recommendations for Constructing Roadside Vegetation Barriers to Improve Near Road Air Quality (Washington D.C., 2016).
Kumar, P. et al. The nexus between air pollution, green infrastructure and human health. Environ. Int. 133, 105181 (2019).
Abhijith, K. et al. Air pollution abatement performances of green infrastructure in open road and built-up street canyon environments–A review. Atmos. Environ. 162, 71–86 (2017).
Jennings, V. et al. Structural characteristics of tree cover and the association with cardiovascular and respiratory health in Tampa, FL. J. Urban Health 96, 669–681 (2019).
Lovasi, G. S. et al. Urban tree canopy and asthma, wheeze, rhinitis, and allergic sensitization to tree pollen in a New York City birth cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 121, 494–500 (2013).
Vos, P. E., Maiheu, B., Vankerkom, J. & Janssen, S. Improving local air quality in cities: to tree or not to tree? Environ. Pollut. 183, 113–122 (2013).
Frumkin, H. et al. Nature contact and human health: a research agenda. Environ. Health Perspect. 75001, 1 (2017).
Shanahan, D. et al. Toward improved public health outcomes from urban nature. Am. J. Public Health 105, 470–477 (2015).
Reid, C. E., Clougherty, J. E., Shmool, J. L. & Kubzansky, L. D. Is all urban green space the same? A comparison of the health benefits of trees and grass in New York City. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 14, 1411 (2017).
Wolf, K. L. et al. Urban trees and human health: a scoping review. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 17, 4371 (2020).
Jennings, V. & Bamkole, O. The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: an avenue for health promotion. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 16, 452 (2019).
Jennings, V. & Johnson Gaither, C. Approaching environmental health disparities and green spaces: an ecosystem services perspective. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 12, 1952–1968 (2015).
Wolch, J., Byrne, J. & Newell, J. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc. Urban Plann. 125, 234–244 (2014).
Rigolon, A., Browning, M. & Jennings, V. Inequities in the quality of urban park systems: an environmental justice investigation of cities in the United States. Landsc. Urban Plann. 178, 156–169 (2018).
Pham, T.-T.-H., Apparicio, P., Séguin, A.-M., Landry, S. & Gagnon, M. Spatial distribution of vegetation in Montreal: an uneven distribution or environmental inequity? Landsc. Urban Plann. 107, 214–224 (2012).
McConnachie, M., Shackleton, C. M. & McGregor, G. K. The extent of public green space and alien plant species in 10 small towns of the Sub-Tropical Thicket Biome. South Afr. Urban Urban Gree 7, 1–13 (2008).
Venter, Z. S., Shackleton, C. M., Van Staden, F., Selomane, O. & Masterson, V. A. Green Apartheid: urban green infrastructure remains unequally distributed across income and race geographies in South Africa. Landsc. Urban Plann. 203, 103889 (2020).
Ferguson, M., Roberts, H. E., McEachan, R. R. C. & Dallimer, M. Contrasting distributions of urban green infrastructure across social and ethno-racial groups. Landsc. Urban Plann. 175, 136–148 (2018).
Zhu, Z., Ren, J. & Liu, X. Green infrastructure provision for environmental justice: application of the equity index in Guangzhou, China. Urban Urban Gree 46, 126443 (2019).
Escobedo, F. J., Clerici, N., Staudhammer, C. L. & Corzo, G. T. Socio-ecological dynamics and inequality in Bogotá, Colombia’s public urban forests and their ecosystem services. Urban Urban Gree 14, 1040–1053 (2015).
Jennings, V., Floyd, M. F., Shanahan, D., Coutts, C. & Sinykin, A. Emerging issues in urban ecology: implications for research, social justice, human health, and well-being. Popul. Environ. 39, 69–86 (2017).
Schell, C. J. et al. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments. Science 369, eaay4497 (2020).
Gee, G. C. & Payne-Sturges, D. C. Environmental health disparities: a framework integrating psychosocial and environmental concepts. Environ. Health Perspect. 112, 1645 (2004).
Bullard, R. D., Mohai, P., Saha, R. & Wright, B. Toxic wastes and race at twenty: Why race still matters after all of these years. Environ. Law, 38, 371–411 (2008).
Hardin, G. Tragedy of Commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968).
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Cole, H. & Pearsall, H. New scholarly pathways on green gentrification: What does the urban ‘green turn’mean and where is it going? Prog. Hum. Geogr. 43, 1064–1086 (2019).
Maantay, J. A. & Maroko, A. R. Brownfields to greenfields: Environmental justice versus environmental gentrification. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 15, 2233 (2018).
Cole, H. V. S., Triguero-Mas, M., Connolly, J. J. T. & Anguelovski, I. Determining the health benefits of green space: does gentrification matter? Health Place 57, 1–11 (2019).
Jelks, N. T. O., Jennings, V. & Rigolon, A. Green Gentrification and Health: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 18, 907 (2021).
Baró, F. et al. Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain. AMBIO 43, 466–479 (2014).
Stuart, A., Mudhasakul, S. & Sriwatanapongse, W. The social distribution of neighborhood-scale air pollution and monitoring protection. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 59, 591–602 (2009).
Wu, C.-D. et al. Mapping the vertical distribution of population and particulate air pollution in a near-highway urban neighborhood: Implications for exposure assessment. J. exposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 24, 297–304 (2014).
Williams, D. R. & Collins, C. Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep. 116, 404 (2001).
Jones, C. P. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener’s tale. Am. J. Public Health 90, 1212 (2000).
The authors would like to thank Drs. Richard Schulterbrandt Gragg and Gary Adamkiewicz for feedback that enhanced the quality of this manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Jennings, V., Reid, C.E. & Fuller, C.H. Green infrastructure can limit but not solve air pollution injustice. Nat Commun 12, 4681 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24892-1