Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ternary aromatic and anti-aromatic clusters derived from the hypho species [Sn2Sb5]3−

Abstract

Heterometallic clusters have attracted broad interests in the synthetic chemistry due to their various coordination modes and potential applications in heterogeneous catalysis. Here we report the synthesis, experimental, and theoretical characterizations of four ternary clusters ([M2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− (M = Cr, Mo), and [(MSn2Sb5)2]4−, (M = Cu, Ag)) in the process of capturing the hypho- [Sn2Sb5]3− in ethylenediamine (en) solution. We show that the coordination of the binary anion to transition-metal ions or fragments provides additional stabilization due to the formation of locally σ-aromatic units, producing a spherical aromatic shielding region in the cages. While in the case of [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− stabilization arises from locally σ-aromatic three-centre and five-centre two-electron bonds, aromatic islands in [(AgSn2Sb5)2]4− and [(CuSn2Sb5)2]4− render them globally antiaromatic. This work describes the coordination chemistry of the versatile building block [Sn2Sb5]3−, thus providing conceptual advances in the field of metal-metal bonding in clusters.

Introduction

Zintl-precursors play a key role in the construction of numerous metal clusters via complex coordination. The first structural determination of a Zintl anion was made by Kummer and Diehl in the 1970s, when they revealed the presence of [Sn9]4− cluster, which was subsequently used as a precursor for the synthesis of many polystannides1. Afterward, many more homo- and heteroatomic polyanions were discovered including [E9]4− (E = Si-Pb), [Pn7]3− (Pn = P-Bi) and [Tt2Pn2]2- (Tt = Ge-Pb)2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, and a number of new clusters were produced using them as precursors12,13,14,15. In the majority of these clusters, the relationship between structure, bonding, and valence electron count can be understood in terms of either the Zintl-Klemm concept addressing electron-precise structures composed of formal two-center two-electron (2c-2e)bonds16,17 or the Wade-Mingos rules18,19,20, which were originally applied to electron-deficient boranes with delocalized bonding, and later introduced into Zintl clusters. According to Wade-Mingos rules, [B10H10]2− is a classic closo-type polyhedron (Fig. 1a), isostructural with [Ge10]2− and [Pb10]2−. The most commonly used Zintl-precursors [E9]4−(E = Si-Pb) of the nido- type can be formed by removing one 4-connected vertex from the closo-type (Fig. 1b)21,22. Lately, Dehnen and co-workers reported the first arachno-Zintl ion [Sn5Sb3]3−, which fills the gap in the series of the known compounds (Fig. 1c)23. The only reported hypho-Zintl anion, [Sn3Bi3]5− with high negative charges, was obtained only in liquid ammonia24. However, the hypho-cage derived from the 10-vertice [B10H10]2− closo-type has not yet been observed.

Fig. 1: Four representative structures from closo to hypho-type (this work).
figure1

a [B10H10]2−, b [E9]4− (E = Si-Pb), c [Sn5Sb3]3−, d hypho-[Sn2Sb5]3−. The globe colors are as follow: B = green, Tt (Si-Pb) = orange, Sb = blue.

Recently, we adopted self-assembly as a synthetic strategy to synthesize a series of large Au/Pb clusters [Au8Pb33]6−, [Au12Pb44]8−, constructed from a nido-type cluster [AuPb11]3−25. As part of this ongoing study, we aim to build metal clusters using other unnoticed Zintl precursors and the solid-state Zintl phase “K8SnSb4” came into our sight26. Though no new precursor has yet been isolated from its solution, a family of clusters all containing a quadricyclane-like cage [Sn2Sb5]3− are crystallized in the reaction of K8SnSb4 with oxidizing organometallic compounds (Fig. 1d). Herein, we report the syntheses and characterizations of these clusters [M2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− (M = Cr, 1; Mo, 2), [(MSn2Sb5)2]4− (M = Ag, 3; Cu, 4). This series corresponds to a vertex supplement process, from hypho- to arachno-, and then to nido- type. Our analysis of the electronic structure also indicates that while clusters 1 and 2 are aromatic, 3 and 4 feature anti-aromaticity. It is also found that the solid phase “K8SnSb4” could act as a versatile precursor to construct multinary cluster anions, and [Sn2Sb5]3− may serve as a potential building unit for further reactions.

Results

Synthesis and characterization

An en solution of K8SnSb4 reacted with Cr(CO)6 or Mo(CO)6 in the presence of [2.2.2]-crypt to give rise to nido-type clusters [Cr2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− (1) or [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− (2). The compounds [K(2.2.2-crypt)]4[(AgSn2Sb5)2] (3′) and [K(2.2.2-crypt)]4[(CuSn2Sb5)2] (4′) were obtained from the reaction of K8SnSb4 with Ag4(Mes)4 and Cu(PPh3)Cl, respectively. Fig. 2a summarizes the reactions reported here. The ESI mass spectrum (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Figs. 1025) combined with EDX data (Supplementary Figs. 2629) confirms a 2:5 Sn:Sb ratio in all four clusters, while X-ray diffraction confirmed the positions of the heavy atoms in the clusters. The overall charges on the clusters (3− on 1 and 2, 4− on 3 and 4), in conjunction with the typical charges on the transition metal fragments ([Cr/Mo(CO)3]0, Cu+/Ag+), suggests that the Sn2Sb5 fragment is at the formal 3− charge state. To verify that, our structural studies were complemented by DFT calculations on the isolated [Sn2Sb5]3− unit. Various isomeric structures of the [Sn2Sb5]3− stoichiometry were explored via the unbiased Coalescence Kick27,28 (CK) algorithm and their total energies were compared (the lowest energy metastable isomers are shown in Supplementary Table 6). Three low-lying isomers exhibit cognate geometrical structures, differing in the positions of the Sb and Sn atoms (Supplementary Table 6, Supplementary Data 1). These isomers can be considered energetically indistinguishable at the DFT level as the energy difference was calculated to be within ~3 kcal/mol by most of the functionals. By comparing with the experimental X-ray data, it is evident that the isomer \(C_{{2v}}\)-[Sn2Sb5]3− describes well all structural features obtained from the experiment, better matching the atomic positions than the other two less symmetrical isomers (Supplementary Fig. 43). It is worthy to note that the described tri-anion [Sn2Sb5]3− species were not expected to be thermodynamically stable toward autodetachment of an electron, or structure dissociation. However, it was further proved that the results obtained for the [Sn2Sb5]3− species are similar to those of the neutral K3[Sn2Sb5] complexes, which are stable towards electrons ejections and structural degradation29. The CK calculations for K3[Sn2Sb5] confirmed similar geometrical features of the Sn2Sb5 core with the three low-lying isomers including C2v-K3[Sn2Sb5] (Supplementary Table 7, Supplementary Data 1). The energy difference between these isomers becomes even smaller, i.e., ~1 kcal/mol at most of the DFT functionals, and ~1.7 kcal/mol at the more accurate CCSD level, thus confirming that they are indeed energetically degenerate.

Fig. 2: Reaction diagram and major ESI (−) mass spectra.
figure2

a Reaction diagram for the synthesis of clusters 14. b ESI (−) mass peaks corresponding to [Cr2(CO)6Sn2Sb5] (left) and [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5] (right). The experimental mass distributions are depicted in black, and the theoretical masses of the isotope distributions are shown in red (the experimental values are labeled to the fourth digit.

It is important to note that silver and copper mirrors were observed on the wall of the test tubes during the synthesis of 3 and 4, indicating that AgI and CuI are acting as oxidizing agents. However, we have not been able to isolate naked [Sn2Sb5]3− (5) that may be indicative of the high degree of strain and that this cluster can be stabilized only through coordination to transition metal ions. In this sense, it is very similar to the case of the ozone-like [Bi3]3− cluster30.

As shown in Fig. 3, all four clusters contain the same hypho- structure unit [Sn2Sb5]3− (5) constructed by two 3-atom and 5-atom faces and one adjacent 4-atom face, which can be regarded as derived from the 10-vertex closo deltahedra by removing one 4-connected and two 5-connected vertices. Clusters 1 and 2 are isostructural, and contain nine atoms in a distorted mono-capped square antiprismatic geometry, with Sb atoms occupying all five 4-connected vertices and two Sn and Mo atoms at the 5-connected vertices. The two zero-electron donor transition metal fragments Mo(CO)3 coordinate to the 5-membered rings of the Sn2Sb5 cluster and form an expanded square plane Mo2Sn2 (3.1788(8)–3.2407(8) Å) compared with the bottom Sb4 plane (2.8031(9)–2.9259(8) Å). All Mo–Sb bond lengths fall in a narrow range, from 2.9250(8) Å to 2.9538(8) Å, comparable to those reported in the [Sb7Mo(CO)3]3− anion (2.942(8)–2.951(9)) Å31.

Fig. 3: Ellipsoid plot (50% level) of the crystal structures.
figure3

a [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3−, b [(AgSn2Sb5)2]4−, c [(CuSn2Sb5)2]4− (b, c represent front and side views of the same structural type). The ellipsoid colors are as follow: Sn = pink, Sb = blue, Mo = green, Ag = yellow, Cu = orange, C = gray and O = red.

The anionic clusters [(AgSn2Sb5)2]4− and [(CuSn2Sb5)2]4− are also isostructural and can be described as a dimer of two arachno-cages (MSn2Sb5)2− sharing an M2Sb2 diamond plane. From the structural perspective, the hypho-[Sn2Sb5]3− is very similar to that in 1 and 2 and the comparison of selected bond distances are listed in Table 1. By introducing a Cu+ or Ag+ ion to occupy one of the above-mentioned 5-connected vertices, 5 is transformed to an arachno-cage (MSn2Sb5)2-, which is isostructural with the recently reported Zintl ion [Sn5Sb3]3− 23. The two (MSn2Sb5)2− cages are arranged upside down resulting in two parallel Sb4 planes. In the Ag system (3), the Ag–Sn distances range from 2.970(3) Å to 3.025(3) Å, similar to those in [Ag(Sn9-Sn9)]5− (2.880(2)–3.010(1) Å)32, but longer than the typical Ag–Sn single bonds. There are limited opportunities to compare the Ag–Sb bonds with literature precedents because only a few organometallic compounds such as [Ag12{Sb(SiMe3)}6(PiPr3)6] (2.722(10)–2.746(12) Å) are available as ref. 33. There are three types of Ag–Sb bond lengths in cluster 3. Ag1–Sb1–Ag1’–Sb1’ construct a diamond plane, in which Ag1–Sb1’ and Ag1’–Sb1 are both 2.758(14) Å, similar to most Ag–Sb single bonds. However, Ag1–Sb1 and Ag1’–Sb1’ are 2.917(15) Å, significantly longer than those of the reported complexes. The remaining Ag–Sb bonds lie in a narrow range of 2.874(2)–2.875(3) Å. The only Ag–Ag bond is 2.802(2) Å, shorter than the sum of covalent radii for a single Ag–Ag bond, i.e., 2.88 Å. However, the Cu2Sb2 diamond plane is compressed compared to Ag2Sb2 in 4. The bond length of Cu–Sb1 (2.669 Å) is akin to Cu–Sb1’ (2.616 Å), close to those of {[CuSn5Sb3]2−}2 (2.619(2)–2.641(2) Å)34, but considerably longer than typical Cu–Sb single bond, 2.554(9) Å in [ClCu(SbPh3)3]35. The Cu–Cu distance is 2.545 Å, well comparable with those of [Cu4@Sn18]4− (2.5292(12)−2.5511(13) Å) and {[CuGe9Mes]2}4− (2.5214(7) Å)36,37.

Table 1 Comparison of selected atomic distances for clusters 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Structure and chemical bonding

According to Wade-Mingos and mno rules18,19,20,38, every naked Sn atom bearing a lone pair provides two electrons for cluster bonding (2 × 2), and each Sb atom owns three skeleton electrons (3 × 5), plus three negative charges, leading to a total of 22 skeleton electrons (2n + 8). The cluster contains one polyhedron (m = 1), seven atoms (n = 7) and three missing vertices (o = 3), totally generating 11 orbitals available for cluster bonding. By introducing a d10 metal atom (Ag or Cu) to occupy one of the missing 5-connected vertices, each half of dimeric 3 and 4 attains an arachno-type structure. In light of this, Ag+ or Cu+ provides one electron for cluster bonding, leading to 22 skeleton electrons (2n + 6) and fitting into m + n + o rule as well. Two Mo0 atoms each coordinated by three carbonyl groups occupy two 5-connected vertices, yielding a distorted monocapped square antiprism nido-type cluster 2. Thereby, the skeletal electron count is consistent with the above two cases.

In order to understand the chemical bonding of clusters 1, 2, 3, and 4, we started our analysis from the hypho-[Sn2Sb5]3− unit. The 36 valence electrons were distributed performing adaptive natural partitioning (AdNDP) analysis39 as implemented in AdNDP 2.0 code40. The AdNDP method can represent a chemical bonding pattern in terms of both Lewis bonding elements (lone pairs (1c–2e) and 2c–2e bonds) as well as delocalized bonding elements (such as nc–2e (n > 2) bonds), while the latter are usually associated with the concepts of aromaticity and antiaromaticity. This technique has been widely used in describing chemical bonding pattern of various Zintl clusters41,42,43,44,45,46,47. The chemical bonding of [Sn2Sb5]3− can be entirely described in terms of the classical 1c–2e and 2c–2e bonds (Supplementary Fig. 31). Specifically, seven s-type lone pairs with ON = 1.98–1.89 |e| were found on each Sn and Sb atoms, and one p-type lone pair with ON = 1.71 |e| was localized on the apex Sb-atom. The remaining 20 electrons form ten 2c–2e σ-bonds with ON = 1.99–1.92 |e|, which are responsible for the shape of the entire frame. Since the initial precursor is rather unstable in solution, it can be expected that the transition-metal coordination increases the stability of these clusters. According to the comparative chemical bonding analyses of complexes 14, the stabilization effect can be explained by the formation of locally σ-aromatic fragments between transition metal atoms and [Sn2Sb5]3− unit.

The optimized geometry of the [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− has C2v symmetry, and all bond lengths are within 0.07 Å of their crystallographic counterparts. Overall, 124 valence electrons can be found as 62 two-electron bonding elements. From the optimized geometry of the cluster, it is obvious that the geometry of [Sn2Sb5]3− unit is preserved, and, hence, similar bonding fragments are anticipated in this structure. Indeed, seven 1c–2e s-type lone pairs and four 2c–2e Sb–Sb σ-bonds were also found in [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3−, similar to the [Sn2Sb5]3− cluster (Fig. 4a). However, the rest of the bonding elements were found as delocalized: four 3c–2e σ-bonds with ON = 1.91 |e| were found over the Mo–Sb–Sn units, and the remaining six electrons form three 5c–2e bonds that are responsible for the locally σ-aromatic behavior of the Mo2Sn2Sb cap fragment. Thus, it is the formation of the multicenter 3c–2e and 5c–2e bonding elements that provides extra stabilization of the complex. In addition to AdNDP, the topology analysis of the electron localization function48 (ELF) was performed for this cluster, as additional valuable method for determination of chemical bonding of Zintl clusters49. The ELF results are fully consistent with the AdNDP picture (Supplementary Fig. 39). The same bonding pattern was found for the cognate [Cr2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− complex, although with slightly different ON values (Supplementary Figs. 3334).

Fig. 4: Chemical bonding pattern of the cage fragments.
figure4

a [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3−, b [(CuSn2Sb5)2]4−. ON denotes occupation numbers (equal to 2.00 |e| in an ideal case). Lines between atoms are presented for visualization and do not necessarily correspond to 2c–2e bonds. Sn-atoms are dark yellow, Sb-atoms are blue, Mo-atoms are green, C-atoms are gray, Cu-atoms are dark red and O-atoms are red.

A different origin of stabilization was found in the [(AgSn2Sb5)2]4− and [(CuSn2Sb5)2]4− clusters. As one would expect, the same bonding patterns were revealed for these species due to the valence isoelectronic Ag and Cu, in agreement with their similar geometrical structures. For the sake of simplicity, we will describe only the Cu-containing cluster below, noting that the same conclusions hold for the Ag-containing counterpart. Some of the bonds relevant to the discussion of the bonding pattern in the [(CuSn2Sb5)2]4− cluster are shown in Fig. 4b. As in the case of the Mo-based complex, the optimized geometry of [(CuSn2Sb5)2]4− contains two Sn2Sb5 fragments that are almost identical to the isolated [Sn2Sb5]3− unit geometry. However, in this case, the similarity is even more traced. Thus, fourteen s-type lone pairs with ON = 1.97–1.89 |e| and twenty 2c–2e bonds with ON = 1.98–1.80 |e| were localized, which almost completely coincides with the pattern found in [Sn2Sb5]3−. Further localization leads to five doubly occupied d-type lone-pairs on each Cu-atom with ON = 1.99–1.97 | e|. The remaining 4 electrons form two 4c–2e Sb-Cu-Cu-Sb σ-bonds (Supplementary Fig. 36), whose combination can give two 3c–2e Cu-Cu-Sb σ-bonds (Fig. 4b). The complete bonding patterns for the Ag-containing and Cu-containing complexes are shown in Supplementary Figs. 37, 38, respectively. The shape of the Cu2Sb2 fragment, the chemical bonding picture, and the number of electrons (4e) hint at the antiaromatic character of this diamond-shaped unit. Positive NICSzz values at the center of Cu2Sb2 confirm the antiaromatic behavior of this unit (Supplementary Table 8). This is also in agreement with our previous studies on the {[CuGe9Mes]2}4− cluster featuring a similar Cu2Ge2 fragment that was found to exhibit the antiaromatic character37. Similarly, it is noted that the antiaromaticity of fragments with four atoms leads to the formation of two locally σ-aromatic 3c–2e islands providing stabilization (Supplementary Fig. 36). This is denoted by their negative NICSzz values at the center of each M2Sb triangle (Supplementary Table 8), as manifestation of the characteristics central shielding for aromatic rings, with a complementary deshielding region (positive NICSzz values) which overlaps at the center of the M2Sb2 diamond.

To further explore the potential global aromatic/antiaromatic characteristics of 2–4, we report the induced magnetic field (Bind) as a magnetic criterion of aromaticity (Fig. 5)50,51,52. Spherical aromatic clusters are able to sustain a long-ranged shielding cone as a distinctive property involving the overall structure. It is useful to compare directly the induced field for all four clusters despite their different shape and composition. The isotropic term (Bisoind), accounting for the average of different orientations of the applied field resembling the constant molecular tumbling in solution-state, exhibits a shielding surface for [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− owing to the presence of the multiple delocalized bonding elements (Fig. 4). It is depicted by 3c–2e and 5c–2e bonds within the cluster cage, which share common atom centers (certain atoms contribute to both multi-center bonds), resulting in a spherical-like shielding surface as observed for other Zintl-clusters and intermetalloids41,53. This situation is similar to the [Ge9]4− case42, where the presence of multiple σ-aromatic boding elements, sharing common atom centers, generates a spherical-like aromatic behavior given by the characteristic shielding surface (Supplementary Fig. 42). To achieve the inherent characteristics of spherical-like aromatic clusters related to the observation of a featured shielding cone, the analysis of the different terms of Bind accounting for specific orientations of the applied field is given. This behavior builds a direct relation between planar and spherical aromatic compounds, which is now extended to spherical-like aromatic species bearing multiple aromatic circuits with common atom centers in the same cage. In the case of planar aromatic species, a shielding cone is established solely when the field is oriented perpendicularly to the ring, in contrast to its appearance under different orientations of the field in three-dimensional aromatic species54,55.

Fig. 5: Plots of magnetic response of the studied clusters.
figure5

Induced magnetic field accounting for the orientation averaged (Bindiso) term, and for different orientation of the external field along three representative axes, for a [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3−, b [(AgSn2Sb5)2]4−, c [(CuSn2Sb5)2]4−. Blue surface: Shielding; Red surface: Deshielding. Isovalue set to ±2 ppm. Sn-atoms are dark purple, Sb-atoms are blue, Mo-atoms are orange, Ag-atoms are green, Cu-atoms are dark yellow, C-atoms are gray, and O-atoms are red.

For [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3−, a long-ranged shielding response with a complementary perpendicular deshielding region is established under a field along the z-axis (Bzext). Interestingly, under different orientations given by Bxext, and Byext, the same features are retained, indicating spherical aromatic behavior in [Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3−, which is not found in the hypho-[Sn2Sb5]3− unit. This observation suggests that for the reactive precursor, the inclusion of Mo(CO)3 fragments achieves a more favorable situation resulting in the above depicted multiple-local aromatic circuits, combining in a spherical-like aromatic cluster, able to capture the hypho-[Sn2Sb5]3− motif. It has been recently discussed by Solà and Teixidor on the basis of closo-C2B10H10, that the spherical aromaticity in deltahedral clusters for a closo-cluster is able to be retained after the removal of a single vertex leading to an aromatic nido-counterpart56. Our results suggest that for a hypho-motif, the spherical-like aromatic behavior ascribed to the nido-[Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− is not able to be retained, as a direct consequence of the consecutive removal of cluster-vertices. Similar results are found for the Cr counterpart (Supplementary Fig. 42).

After aggregation of two hypho-[Sn2Sb5]3− motifs linked by two Ag(I) or Cu(I) atoms, the resulting cluster shows two separated spherical aromatic regimes as suggested by the appearance of two spherical-like shielding regions ascribed to each MSn2Sb5 side (Fig. 5b, c), from the Bisoind term. Moreover, specific orientations of the field cause the shielding cone behavior to be exposed, which results in a dual spherical-spherical aromatic cluster with two separated spherical aromatic regimes bridged by an antiaromatic M2Sb2 diamond, similar to our findings in {[CuGe9Mes]2}4− with an antiaromatic Cu2Ge2 bridging unit37. This behavior is related to the one found for [CB11H11]22− with two separated spherical closo-carboranes57. The characterization of [(AgSn2Sb5)2]4− and [(CuSn2Sb5)2]4−, retaining two spherical aromatic motifs resulting in a stable aggregate, suggests that the hypho-[Sn2Sb5]3− is a useful structural unit to achieve stable building blocks prone to condensate in a controlled manner.

Discussion

In summary, we have synthesized four ternary clusters ([M2(CO)6Sn2Sb5]3− (M = Cr, Mo), and [(MSn2Sb5)2]4−, (M = Cu, Ag)) by the coordination of the hypho-[Sn2Sb5]3− to various transition metals. Through detailed theoretical analysis, we have shown that the origin of stabilization of the clusters lies in the formation of locally σ-aromatic regions that result in a spherical-like shielding surface. In this work, we have presented an effective way to lead the construction of intermediates that can be used in further studies. We believe that our findings will bring new ideas to search for unstable main-group clusters and will also contribute to our understanding of chemical bonding in heterometallic clusters.

Methods

All manipulations and reactions were performed under a nitrogen atmosphere using standard Schlenk or glovebox techniques. En (Aldrich, 99%) and DMF (Aldrich, 99.8%) were freshly distilled by CaH2 prior to use, and stored in N2 prior to use. Tol (Aldrich, 99.8%) was distilled from sodium/benzophenone under nitrogen and stored under nitrogen. [2.2.2]-crypt (4,7,13,16,21,24-Hexaoxa-1,10-diazabicyclo (8.8.8) hexacosane, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, 98%) was dried in a vacuum for one day prior to use. K8SnSb4 was prepared by heating a stoichiometric mixture of the elements (K: 625.6 mg, Sn: 237.4 mg, Sb: 974.4 mg; K: +99%, Sn: 99.999%, Sb: 99.9%, all from Strem) at a rate of 70 °C per hour to 700 °C and keeping it for 36 h in sealed niobium containers closed in evacuated quartz ampules according to the previous procedures26. The K8SnSb4 solid was obtained with a high yield (~92%, 1.7 g) and stored under a dry nitrogen atmosphere in a glove box. Cr(CO)6 and Mo(CO)6 were purchased from Aldrich while Ag4Mes4 and Cu(PPh3) Cl were synthesized according to the literature with a yield of 55 and 60%, respectively58,59.

Synthesis of [K(2.2.2-crypt)]3[Cr2(CO)6Sn2Sb5] (1)

K8SnSb4 (50 mg, 0.055 mmol) and 2.2.2-crypt (83 mg, 0.220 mmol) were dissolved in 2.5 mL en and stirred for 0.5 h to yield a dark brown solution. Cr(CO)6 (25 mg, 0.110 mmol) was added into the reaction mixture resulting in a red-brown suspension, and stirred for 2.5 h at 60 °C. The resulting solution was filtered through glass wool and transferred to a test tube, then carefully layered by toluene (3 mL) to allow for crystallization. After one week, dark red plate crystals of [K(2.2.2-crypt)]3[Cr2(CO)6Sn2Sb5] (1′) in approximately 15% yield (based on Cr(CO)6). [K(2.2.2-crypt)]2[Sn2Sb2] as a side product was also crystallized on the wall of the test tube.

Synthesis of [K(2.2.2-crypt)]3[Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5] (2)

K8SnSb4 (50 mg, 0.055 mmol) and 2.2.2-crypt (83 mg, 0.220 mmol) were dissolved in 2.5 mL en and stirred for 0.5 h to yield a dark brown solution. Mo(CO)6 (33 mg, 0.110 mmol) was added into the reaction mixture resulting in a red-brown suspension, and stirred for 2.5 h at 60 °C. The resulting solution was filtered through glass wool and transferred to a test tube, then carefully layered by toluene (3 mL) to allow for crystallization. After 1 week, dark red plate crystals of [K(2.2.2-crypt)]3[Mo2(CO)6Sn2Sb5] (2′) in ~20% yield (based on Mo(CO)6) and [K(2.2.2-crypt)]2[Sn2Sb2] crystallized on the wall of the test tube.

Synthesis of [K(2.2.2-crypt)]4[(AgSn2Sb5)2] (3)

In vial 1, K8SnSb4 (50 mg, 0.055 mmol) and 2.2.2-crypt (83 mg, 0.220 mmol) were dissolved in 2.5 mL en and stirred for 0.5 h to yield a dark brown solution. In another vial, Ag4(Mes)4 (25 mg, 0.027 mmol) was dissolved in 0.5 mL tol resulting in a white suspension, and added into vial 1 dropwise. The reaction mixture turned into yellow-brown and stirred for 3.5 h at room temperature. The resulting solution was filtered through glass wool and transferred to a test tube, then carefully layered by toluene (3 mL) to allow for crystallization. After five months, brown thin plate crystals of [K(2.2.2-crypt)]4[(AgSn2Sb5)2] (3′) was isolated in 12% (based on Ag4(Mes)4) together with red crystals [K(2.2.2-crypt)]2[Sn7Sb2]. The crystals could also be isolated in one month but the crystal data quality was usually not as good as from long reaction time.

Synthesis of [K(2.2.2-crypt)]4[(CuSn2Sb5)2] (4)

K8SnSb4 (70 mg, 0.075 mmol) and 2.2.2-crypt (112 mg, 0.300 mmol) were dissolved in 2.5 mL en and stirred for 0.5 h to yield a dark green solution. Cu(PPh3)Cl (27 mg, 0.075 mmol) was added into the reaction mixture resulting in a yellow-brown suspension. After stirring for 3 h, the mixture was centrifuged for 10 min at 8000 r/min. The supernatant was filtered through glass wool and transferred to a test tube, then carefully layered by toluene (3.5 mL) to allow for crystallization. After one week, brown block crystals of [K(2.2.2-crypt)]4[(CuSn2Sb5)2] (4′) was isolated in 15% (based on Cu(PPh3)Cl) together with red crystals [K(2.2.2-crypt)]2[Sn7Sb2].

Theoretical methods

All structures were optimized at the DFT level using the PBE060 hybrid density functional and def2-TZVP basis set61. The Gaussian 16 code62 was used for the optimization procedures. The same level was used for chemical bonding analysis including the adaptive natural density partitioning (AdNDP)39,40 analysis and electron localization function (ELF)48 analysis. The AdNDP 2.0 code was used to perform AdNDP analysis, which is based on the general ideas of the NBO analysis63. The topology analysis of ELF was performed with the MultiWFN program64. The ChemCraft 1.8 software was used to visualize chemical bonding patterns and geometries of investigated compounds. The isomeric structures of [Sn2Sb5]3− were explored via an unbiased Coalescence Kick (CK) algorithm27,28. 2000 sample structures were optimized at PBE0/LANL2DZ65 level. The isomeric structures of K3[Sn2Sb5] were explored at the same level with 4000 sample structures. The seven lowest structures for both CK calculations then were reoptimized using different functionals and def2-TZVP basis set (Supplementary Tables 6, 7). The frequency calculations were performed using the harmonic approximation, and all reported structures were confirmed to be minima due to the absence of imaginary frequencies. To assess the aromaticity and antiaromaticity with a quantitative parameter, NICS calculations were performed at PBE0/def2-TZVP level.

The nucleus-independent shielding tensors (σij)52,66,67 were calculated within the GIAO formalism by using the ADF2019 code68, employing the OPBE60,69,70 functional and an all-electron STO-TZ2P basis set, placed in a three-dimensional grid in order to evaluate the induced field (Bind), upon an external magnetic field (Bext), related via Biind = −σijBjext52,66,67,71,72,73. For convenience, the i and j suffixes are related to the x-, y- and z-axes of the molecule-fixed Cartesian system (i, j = x, y, z). The values of Bind are given in ppm in relation to Bext. Relativistic effects were considered through the ZORA Hamiltonian74. Solvation effects were considered via the COSMO module as implemented in the ADF code by using ethylenediamine as a solvent.

X-ray diffraction

Suitable single crystals of compound 1′, 2′, 3′, and 4′ were selected for X-ray diffraction analyses. Crystallographic data were collected on Rigaku XtalAB Pro MM007 DW diffractometer with graphite monochromated Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54184 Å). Structures were solved using direct methods and then refined using SHELXL-2014 and Olex2 to convergence75,76,77, in which all the non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically during the final cycles and all hydrogen atoms of the organic molecule were placed by geometrical considerations. The disorder existed in cryptand molecules of compound 3′ and heavy atoms of cluster 3 and 4 were solved by the Split SAME process in Olex 2. The disordered two toluene solvent molecules of compound 1′ and 2′ were squeezed by the Solvent Mask in Olex 2. The specific bond angles and distances were constrained by the “Dfix” order.

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) investigations

Negative ion mode ESI-MS of the DMF solutions of crystals of 1′ and 2′ were measured on an LTQ linear ion trap spectrometer by Agilent Technologies ESI-TOF-MS (6230). The spray voltage was 5.48 kV and the capillary temperature was kept at 300 °C. The capillary voltage was 30 V. The samples were made up inside a glovebox under a nitrogen atmosphere and rapidly transferred to the spectrometer in an airtight syringe by direct infusion with a Harvard syringe pump at 0.2 mL/min.

Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopic analysis

EDX analysis on the compounds of 1′, 2′, 3′, and 4′ was performed using a scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JEOL JSM-7800F, Japan). Data acquisition was performed with an acceleration voltage of 15 kV and an accumulation time of 60 s.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on a reasonable request. The X-ray crystallographic of compounds 1, 2, 3, and 4 reported in this study have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) under deposition numbers 2080455 and 2080457–2080459. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

References

  1. 1.

    Diehl, L., Khodadadeh, K., Kummer, D. & Strähle, J. Inorganic polyhedral compoinds, II1 Zintl’s “polyanionic salts”: synthesis of the crystalline compounds [Na4·7en]Sn9, [Na4·5en]Ge9 and [Na3·4en]Sb7. The crystal structure of [Na4·7en] Sn9. Z. Naturforsch. B 31, 522–524 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Corbett, J. D. The nonastannide(4-) anion Sn94−, a novel capped antiprismatic configuration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 3313–3317 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yong, L., Hoffmann, S. D. & Fässler, T. F. ∞2[K4Pb9]—a low-dimensional arrangement of [Pb9]4− clusters in [K(18-crown-6)]2K2Pb9 · (en)1.5. Inorg. Chim. Acta 359, 4774–4778 (2006).

  4. 4.

    Liu, C. & Sun, Z.-M. Recent advances in structural chemistry of Group 14 Zintl ions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 382, 32–56 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Critchlow, S. C. & Corbett, J. D. Homopolyatomic anions of the post transition elements. Synthesis and structure of potassium-crypt salts of the tetraantimonide(2−) and heptaantimonide(3−) anions, Sb42− and Sb73−. Inorg. Chem. 23, 770–774 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kraus, F. & Korber, N. The chemical bond in polyphosphides: crystal structures, the electron localization function, and a new view of aromaticity in P42− and P5. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 5945–5959 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Adolphson, D., Corbett, J. D. & Merryman, D. Stable homopolyatomic anions of the post-transition metals. “Zintl ions”. The synthesis and structure of a salt containing the heptantimonide(3−) anion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, 7234–7239 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Perla, G. L., Oliver, G. A. & Sevov, S. C. Bi73–: The missing family member, finally isolated and characterized. Inorg. Chem. 54, 872–875 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lips, F., Schellenberg, I., Pöttgen, R. & Dehnen, S. The subtle influence of binary versus homoatomic Zintl ions: the phenyl-ligated trimetallic cage [Sn2Sb5(ZnPh)2]3−. Chem. Eur. J. 15, 12968–12973 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mitzinger, S., Broeckaert, L., Massa, W., Weigend, F. & Dehnen, S. Understanding of multimetallic cluster growth. Nat. Commun. 7, 10480 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wilson, R. J., Lichtenberger, N., Weinert, B. & Dehnen, S. Intermetalloid and heterometallic clusters combining p-block (semi)metals with d- or f-block metals. Chem. Rev. 119, 8506–8554 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Charles, S., Fettinger, J. C., Bott, S. G. & Eichhorn, B. W. Synthesis and characterization of [η4-P7Ni(CO)]3−, [η4-HP7Ni(CO)]2−, and [η2-P7PtH(PPh3)]2−: two electronically equivalent protonated Zintl ion complexes with markedly different structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 4713–4714 (1996).

  13. 13.

    Goicoechea, J. M. & Sevov, S. C. Deltahedral germanium clusters: insertion of transition-metal atoms and addition of organometallic fragments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 4155–4161 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Spiekermann, A., Hoffmann, S. D., Kraus, F. & Fässler, T. F. [Au3Ge18]5−—a gold–germanium cluster with remarkable Au–Au interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 1638–1640 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Pan, F.-X., Guggolz, L., Weigend, F. & Dehnen, S. Atom exchange versus reconstruction: (GexAs4−x)x (x=2, 3) as building blocks for the supertetrahedral Zintl cluster [Au6(Ge3As)(Ge2As2)3]3−. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 16638–16643 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Klemm, W. Metalloids and their compounds with the alkali metals. Proc. Chem. Soc. 329–364 (1958).

  17. 17.

    Nesper, R. The Zintl-Klemm concept—a history survey. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 640, 2639–2648 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wade, K. Skeletal electron counting in cluster species. Some generalisations and predictions. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 8, 559–562 (1972).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wade, K. Structural and bonding patterns in cluster chemistry. Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 18, 1–66 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Corbett, J. D. Homopolyatomic ions of the post‐transition elements—synthesis, structure, and bonding. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 21, 129–158 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bentlohner, M. M., Fischer, C. & Fässler, T. F. Synthesis and characterization of pristine closo-[Ge10]2-. Chem. Commun. 52, 9841–9843 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Spiekermann, A., Hoffmann, S. D. & Fässler, T. F. The Zintl ion [Pb10]2-: a rare example of a homoatomic closo cluster. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 3459–3462 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wilson, R. J., Weigend, F. & Dehnen, S. The Arachno‐Zintl Ion (Sn5Sb3)3− and the effects of element composition on the structures of isoelectronic clusters: another facet of the pseudo‐element concept. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 14251–14255 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Friedrich, U. & Korber, N. A step in between: [Sn3Bi3]5− and Its structural relationship to [Sn3Bi5]3− and [Sn4Bi4]4−. ChemistryOpen 5, 306–310 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Shu, C.-C., Morgan, H. W. T., Qiao, L., McGrady, J. E. & Sun, Z.-M. A family of lead clusters with precious metal cores. Nat. Commun. 11, 3477 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Eisenmann, B. & Klein, J. Na5SnSb3 und K8SnSb4, zwei neue Zintlphasen mit tetraedrischen SnSb4-Baueinheiten. Z. Naturforsch. B 43, 1156–1160 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sergeeva, A. P., Averkiev, B. B., Zhai, H.-J., Boldyrev, A. I. & Wang, L.-S. All-boron analogues of aromatic hydrocarbons: B17 and B18. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 224304 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Averkiev, B. B. “Geometry and electronic structure of doped clusters via the Coalescence Kick method,” Ph.D. dissertation (Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 2009).

  29. 29.

    Báez-Grez, R. et al. Exploring the potential energy surface of trimetallic deltahedral Zintl ions: lowest-energy [Sn6Ge2Bi]3− and [(Sn6Ge2Bi)2]4− Structures. Inorg. Chem. 58, 10057–10064 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Xu, L. & Sevov, S. C. Stabilization of ozone-like [Bi3]3− in the heteroatomic closo-clusters [Bi3Cr2(CO)6]3− and [Bi3Mo2(CO)6]3−. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 4091–4092 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Charles, S., Eichhorn, B. W., Rheingold, A. L. & Bott, S. G. Synthesis, structure, and properties of the [E7M(CO)3]3− complexes where E = P, As, Sb and M = Cr, Mo, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 8077–8086 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang, J.-Q., Wahl, B. & Fässler, T. F. [Ag(Sn9-Sn9)]5−: a homoleptic silver complex of a dimeric Sn9 Zintl anion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6592–6595 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Fenske, D., Rothenberger, A. & Wieber, S. Synthesis and characterization of the first silver complexes with antimony anions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 5, 648–651 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wilson, R. J., Broeckaert, L., Spitzer, F., Weigend, F. & Dehnen, S. {[CuSn5Sb3]2−}2: a dimer of inhomogeneous superatoms. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 1–7 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rheingold, A. L. & Fountain, M. E. Crystal and molecular structure of [(C6H5)3Sb]3CuCl·CHC13. J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc. 14, 549–557 (1984).

  36. 36.

    Qiao, L. et al. [Cu4@E18]4– (E = Sn, Pb): fused derivatives of endohedral stannaspherene and plumbaspherene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 13288–1329 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wang, Z.-C. et al. All-metal σ-antiaromaticity in dimeric cluster anion {[CuGe9Mes]2}4−. Chem. Commun. 56, 6583 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Jemmis, E. D., Balakrishnarajan, M. M. & Pancharatna, P. D. A unifying electron-counting rule for macropolyhedral boranes, metallaboranes, and metallocenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 4313–4323 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zubarev, D. Y. & Boldyrev, A. I. Developing paradigms of chemical bonding: adaptive natural density partitioning. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 5207–5217 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tkachenko, N. V. & Boldyrev, A. I. Chemical bonding analysis of excited states using the adaptive natural density partitioning method. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 9590–9596 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tkachenko, N. V. et al. Spherical aromaticity of all‐metal [Bi@In8Bi12]3−/5− clusters. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 2073–2079 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tkachenko, N. V. & Boldyrev, A. I. Multiple local σ-aromaticity of nonagermanide clusters. Chem. Sci. 10, 5761–5765 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Liu, C. et al. Structure and bonding in [Sb@In8Sb12]3− and [Sb@In8Sb12]5−. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8367–8371 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Xu, H.-L. et al. σ‐Aromaticity‐induced stabilization of heterometallic supertetrahedral clusters [Zn6Ge16]4− and [Cd6Ge16]4−. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 17286–17290 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Liu, C. et al. [Co2@Ge16]4−: localized versus delocalized bonding in two isomeric intermetalloid clusters. Chem. Eur. J. 24, 699–705 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Liu, C. et al. Symmetry reduction upon size mismatch: the non‐icosahedral intermetalloid cluster [Co@Ge12]3−. Chin. J. Chem. 36, 1165–1168 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Li, L.-J., Ali, B., Chen, Z. & Sun, Z.-M. Recent advances in aromatic antimony clusters. Chin. J. Chem. 36, 955–960 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Silvi, B. & Savin, A. Classification of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions. Nature 371, 683–686 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Stroganova, E. A., Troyanov, S. I., Morozov, I. V. & Kuznetsov, A. N. Bismuth polycations revisited: alternative synthesis and electronic structure of Bi6Br7, and bonding in main-group polyatomic ions from a direct space perspective. Crystals 10, 940 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Benassi, R., Lazzeretti, P. & Taddei, F. Magnetic criteria for aromaticity. J. Phys. Chem. 79, 848–851 (1975).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Porannea, R. G. & Stanger, A. Magnetic criteria of aromaticity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 6597–6615 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Islas, R., Heine, T. & Merino, G. The induced magnetic field. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 215–228 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kulichenko, M., Fedik, N., Boldyrev, A. & Castro, A. M. Expansion of magnetic aromaticity criteria to multilayer structures: magnetic response and spherical aromaticity of matryoshka‐like cluster [Sn@Cu12@Sn20]12−. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 2263–2268 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Castro, A. M. The shielding cone in spherical aromatic structures: insights from models for spherical 2(N + 1)2 aromatic fullerenes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 12633–12636 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Poater, J., Solà, M., Viñas, C. & Teixido, F. π Aromaticity and three‐dimensional aromaticity: two sides of the same coin? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 12191–12195 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Poater, J. et al. Too persistent to give up: aromaticity in boron clusters survives radical structural changes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 9396–9407 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Castro, A. M. Interplay between planar and spherical aromaticity: shielding cone behavior in dual planar‐planar, planar‐spherical and spherical‐spherical aromatics. ChemPhysChem 21, 1384–1387 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Meyer, E. M., Gambarotta, S., Floriani, C., Villa, A. C. & Guastinit, C. Polynuclear aryl derivatives of Group 11 metals. Synthesis, solid state-solution structural relationship, and reactivity with phosphines. Organometallics 8, 1067–1079 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Ashiq, K. et al. Synthesis, structure and cytotoxicity evaluation of complexes of N1-substituted-isatin-3-thiosemicarbazone with copper(I) halides. Inorg. Chim. Acta 449, 119–126 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Adamo, C. & Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158–6170 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Schäfer, A., Huber, C. & Ahlrichs, R. Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr. J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5829–5835 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16, Revision B.01 (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2016).

  63. 63.

    Weinhold, F. & Landis, C. R. Valency and bonding: a natural bond orbital donor-acceptor perspective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005).

  64. 64.

    Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wadt, W. R. & Hay, P. J. Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for main group elements Na to Bi. J. Chem. Phys. 82, 284–298 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Heine, T., Corminboeuf, C. & Seifert, G. The magnetic shielding function of molecules and Pi-electron delocalization. Chem. Rev. 105, 3889–3910 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Merino, G., Heine, T. & Seifert, G. The induced magnetic field in cyclic molecules. Chem. A Eur. J. 10, 4367–4371 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF 2019) Code. http://www.scm.com (2020).

  69. 69.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Wang, Y. Generalized gradient approximation for the exchange-correlation hole of a many-electron system. Phys. Rev. B 54, 16533–16539 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Handy, N. C. & Cohen, A. J. Left-right correlation energy. Mol. Phys. 99, 403–412 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Baranac-Stojanović, M. New insight into the anisotropic effects in solution-state NMR spectroscopy. RSC Adv. 4, 308–321 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Klod, S. & Kleinpeter, E. Ab initio calculation of the anisotropy effect of multiple bonds and the ring current effect of arenes—application in conformational and configurational analysis. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 1893–1898 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Charistos, N. D., Papadopoulos, A. G. & Sigalas, M. P. Interpretation of electron delocalization in benzene, cyclobutadiene, and borazine based on visualization of individual molecular orbital contributions to the induced magnetic field. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 1113–1122 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Lenthe, E. V., Baerends, E. J. & Snijders, J. G. Relativistic total energy using regular approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 101, 9783–9792 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXT—integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Cryst. A. 71, 3–8 (2015).

    MATH  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 339–341 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Spek, A. L. Structure validation in chemical crystallography. Acta Cryst. D. 65, 148–155 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21971118 to Z.M.S.) and the USA National Science Foundation (grant CHEM-1664379) to A.I.B. A.I.B. also acknowledges financial support from the R. Gaurth Hansen Professorship fund. The work was also supported by the US Department of Energy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Triad National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy (Contract No. 89233218CNA000001). I.A.P. acknowledges support from J. Robert Oppenheimer Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The support and resources from the Centre for High Performance Computing at the University of Utah are gratefully acknowledged. A.M.C. acknowledges financial support from FONDECYT 1180683. We also thank the valuable discussion with John E. McGrady (Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.M.S. conceived the project and designed the experiments. Y.H.X. performed the synthesis. N.V.T., I.A.P., A.M.C., and A.I.B. performed the quantum chemical calculations and analyzed the data. L.Q. performed the single-crystal X-ray diffraction and analyzed the data. All authors co-wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong-Ming Sun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Yihong Ding, Andreas Schnepf, William Tiznado and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, YH., Tkachenko, N.V., Popov, I.A. et al. Ternary aromatic and anti-aromatic clusters derived from the hypho species [Sn2Sb5]3−. Nat Commun 12, 4465 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24706-4

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing