Abstract
Wavelengthscale lasers provide promising applications through low power consumption requiring for optical cavities with increased quality factors. Cavity radiative losses can be suppressed strongly in the regime of optical bound states in the continuum; however, a finite size of the resonator limits the performance of bound states in the continuum as cavity modes for active nanophotonic devices. Here, we employ the concept of a supercavity mode created by merging symmetryprotected and accidental bound states in the continuum in the momentum space, and realize an efficient laser based on a finitesize cavity with a small footprint. We trace the evolution of lasing properties before and after the merging point by varying the lattice spacing, and we reveal this laser demonstrates the significantly reduced threshold, substantially increased quality factor, and shrunken farfield images. Our results provide a route for nanolasers with reduced outofplane losses in finitesize active nanodevices and improved lasing characteristics.
Introduction
Ultracompact lasers operating in the singlemode regime have been a longstanding goal for nanophotonics. Various mechanisms for strong light confinement were proposed and demonstrated in subwavelength and wavelengthscale optical cavities used to decrease their lasing threshold^{1,2,3,4}. However, nanolasers such as defecttype photonic crystal lasers and plasmonic lasers possess limited output power and exhibit instability to the structural disorder^{5,6}. These properties hinder the practical applications of nanolasers although they have small mode volumes and reduced laser thresholds. On contrary, a bandedge type laser with a periodic structure without defects has a relatively high threshold, but a high output power with the possibility of topological robustness^{7}.
Optical bound states in the continuum (BICs) were shown to be a versatile tool for substantial suppression of outofplane radiative losses and dramatic enhancement of the quality factor (Q factor) in infinite periodic structures to provide lowthreshold lasing and highoutput powers^{8,9,10}. The intrinsic topological nature of BICs splits them into a few groups, with two of the most conventional kinds represented by symmetryprotected BICs, existing at highsymmetry points of the momentum space, and accidental BICs, which can be realized for an arbitrary inplane wavevector. Thus far, symmetryprotected BICs and accidental BICs were observed successfully in Si_{3}N_{4} and Si photonic crystal slabs^{11,12}. In addition, the lasing action was achieved for BIC cavities in a few recent experiments^{13,14,15,16,17,18,19}. The BICenhanced feature of a reasonably low threshold was successfully demonstrated in a cavity with lattices of finite size^{13}. However, most of the developed lasers were still based on cavities of substantially large scales with hundreds of periods and despite that, they did not demonstrate high Q factors. Very recently, a new kind of BIC mode was suggested, which we term here as a superBIC (BIC in the supercavity regime with extremely high values of the Q factor), that originates from the merging of several BICs in the momentum space^{20,21}. The performance of superBICs for active devices, however, was never discussed or studied.
Extended periodic structures consisting of hundreds of unit cells are feasible mostly for passive photonic devices^{11,12,20}. For active devices such as a laser, however, it is critical to use a finite structure with a small footprint due to the limited spot size in optical or electrical pumping. For photonic crystal slabs with just a few dozen periods, the Q factor of conventional BICs is significantly reduced^{22,23,24,25}. Thus, in the most of available studies, the size of BIC cavities was assumed to be infinite for analysis, which caused the difference between the experimental and theoretical results. In addition, it remains unclear whether the topological properties of BIC can be maintained in a finitesize cavity.
Here we demonstrate efficient lasing in a finite periodic photonic structure for three different regimes using one design: the symmetryprotected BIC laser, accidental BIC laser, and the superBIC laser which is a combination of the first two BIC lasers, achieved by tuning the lattice constant. We achieve lasing action from smallscale dielectric photonic crystal slabs operating in the superBIC regime. Our analysis shows that in the vicinity of the superBIC mode the finitesize cavity can possess a high radiative Q factor, in contrast to the other BIC modes. We also show that for finitesize resonators the optimal lattice constant providing the lowest radiation is shifted compared to the infinitesize structure. After the transition to the superBIC regime, we measure the farfield laser image with strong angular confinement, the reduced threshold to ~1.47 kW/cm^{2}, and the increased Q factor up to ~7300. The measured threshold peak power is approximately 50 to ten million times lower than that of earlier demonstrated BIC nanolasers^{13,14,15,16,17,18,19}. Our study presents the direct observation of all the BIC lasers simultaneously and provides an efficient recipe to reduce the optical loss in active nanocavities with finite sizes.
Results
Infinitesize BIC cavity
The design of the laser cavity is based on an infinitesize InGaAsP photonic crystal slab structure with a thickness of 650 nm (inset in Fig. 1a) modulated with a squarelattice array of air holes. The calculated band structure shows that only the fundamental transverseelectriclike (TElike) band is located within the emission wavelength range of the InGaAsP, ~1.5 μm, due to the thick slab of highindex material (Supplementary Fig. 1). The calculated map of Q factor in the kspace shows that the fundamental TElike band demonstrates high Q factors at the origin and at specific points along highly symmetric ΓX and ΓM directions (Supplementary Fig. 2): in total, one symmetryprotected BIC (k= 0) and eight accidental BICs (k~ k_{t} = 0.067a/2π) are formed^{26}. In addition, the multipolar decomposition of electromagnetic fields inside the unit cell shows that both symmetryprotected and accidental BICs are dominated by the outofplane magnetic dipole, which agrees well with the fundamental nature of the TElike mode (Supplementary Fig. 3). Each of accidental BICs is formed because of destructive interference between the dominating outofplane magnetic dipole and weak inplane electric dipole, inplane electric quadrupole, outofplane magnetic quadrupole. We also calculate the evolution of the polarization phases in the farfield for symmetryprotected and accidental BICs (Supplementary Fig. 4)^{26}. The calculation shows the topological charge q = 1 for the symmetryprotected BIC and four accidental BICs located on the ΓM band, and q = –1 for four accidental BICs located on the ΓX band.
In addition, we calculate the wavelengths of the resonant modes shown in Fig. 1a. A symmetryprotected BIC and an accidental BIC mode appear in the range of the lattice constants a from 560 to 590 nm. The wavelengths of these modes become closer as the lattice constant increases at a < 576.3 nm, and only a single mode is observed after the two BIC modes merge at a = 576.3 nm.
Next, the normalized radiation loss of the fundamental TElike band is calculated for different lattice constants along the ΓX direction (black dots in Fig. 1b). At a = 568 nm, the zeroradiation loss is observed at k = 0 (symmetryprotected BIC) and at k = k_{t} (accidental BIC), showing each sharp dependence on the wavevector. The position of the accidental BIC approaches k = 0 as the lattice constant increases; the merging of the BICs occurs at a = 576.3 nm and modifies the dependence on the wavevector in the vicinity of the band edge. The kvector dependence returns to the narrow one at a = 590 nm when the single symmetryprotected BIC is restored. The radiation loss follows the laws [k (k – k_{t}) (k + k_{t})]^{2}, k^{6}, or k^{2} depending on the lattice constant (red curves in Fig. 1b), because of the interaction of the topological charges q_{0} at the symmetryprotected BIC and q_{t} at the accidental BIC^{20}. This feature is also seen in the graph of the k vs. Q factor (Supplementary Fig. 1b).
Finitesize BIC cavity
The fast sixthorder dependence of the radiation losses on the wavevector is crucial to keep a high Q factor for the BIC mode in a finitesize cavity^{20}. Fig. 2a shows the mode magnetic field profile H_{z} at the Γ point of the fundamental TElike band in a photonic crystal slab with 15 × 15 periods. Unlike the infinitesize cavity, the mode profile shows an envelope distribution with a convex shape accompanied by mode leakage into free space^{25,27}. This finitesize effect results in the mode broadening Δk (white circle) in the kspace field distribution, FT(H_{z}) (Fig. 2b), where FT means the spatial Fourier transformation. The mode broadening leads to increased radiation loss due to mixing with the offΓ point modes with a finite Q factor. To increase the Q factor, it is essential to reduce the radiation loss due to the broadening (Fig. 2c). The undesired radiation loss at offΓ points can be effectively suppressed by moving the offΓ BIC with the charge q_{t} inside the mode broadening range Δk (premerging regime) or to the Γ point k = 0 (merging regime). Notably, in the merging process with a limited number of air holes, the most effective radiation suppression can be achieved by placing the charge q_{t} at an optimum k_{t} in the premerging configuration rather than at k = 0 (Fig. 2c), which is explained below.
To elucidate the radiation loss mechanism in the finitesize system, we calculate the 2D maps of the radiation factor in momentum space with varying lattice constants (Fig. 2d). The radiation factor is defined by the kspace mode distribution in a finite domain and the Q factor in an infinite domain, i.e., FT(H_{z})(k)/Q(k), to account for both effects of the cavity size and the radiative loss. For example, the radiation factors are high before merging (a = 568 nm) and after merging (a = 578 nm) because of the substantial radiative loss at offΓ points. At the exact merging condition of a = 576 nm, radiation loss still occurs at the boundary of the mode broadening. Interestingly, a much lower radiation factor is observed in the premerging regime at a = 573 nm because the radiative loss is strongly suppressed in the large kspace area covered by q_{0} and q_{t}. For more detailed quantitative analysis, we plot the inverse radiation factor, [Σ  FT(H_{z})(k)/Q(k)]^{−1}, as a function of the lattice constant when the hole diameter and slab thickness are fixed to 400 and 650 nm, respectively (Fig. 2e). The broad merging configuration occurs due to the finitesize effect. The graph becomes narrower and the maximum occurs at a larger lattice constant when the cavity size increases from N = 15 to 21. Further discussion is performed to investigate the influences caused by other structural parameters on the radiation factor (Supplementary Fig. 5).
In addition, we calculate the radiative Q factor using a fullwave numerical simulation (Fig. 2f). The agreement between the radiative Q factor and the inverse radiation factor demonstrates the effectiveness of our analysis based on the radiation factor. Consequently, in the finitesize cavity, the radiative loss near the mergingBIC regime (from premerging to merging) is still low, whereas the loss in the other BIC regimes is relatively high. Also, the optimal point with the lowest radiation in the finite and infinitesize cavities could be different from each other (Supplementary Note 1).
Measurements of BIC lasing
To experimentally verify the merging of the BICs, we fabricate squarelattice photonic crystal structures using a 650 nmthick InGaAsP slab incorporating seven quantum wells (see “Methods” section). A set of samples with the lattice constant varying from 560 to 580 nm in 1 nm steps is fabricated with the hole radius fixed at ~200 nm (Supplementary Fig. 6). The scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the fabricated sample are shown in Fig. 3a. The photoluminescence (PL) measurements are performed using a 980nm pulsed pump laser with a spot size of ~5.4 μm at room temperature (see “Methods” section).
One or two types of lasing modes are observed in the photonic crystal structures, depending on the lattice constant. The measurement results of the lasing wavelength vs. the lattice constant in a sample are plotted in Fig. 3b. Single lasing peaks are observed at a > 568 nm (bottom inset in Fig. 3b) and two peaks at a ≤ 568 nm. The wavelengths of the two peaks increase with different slopes as the lattice constant increases at a ≤ 568 nm. To identify these lasing modes, we measure their farfield mode images (see “Methods” section). Two distinct farfield images are observed, one with a highly confined donut shape (right inset; Fig. 3b) and the other with a widespread shape (left inset; Fig. 3b). Consequently, the lasing peaks can be classified into the two groups of symmetryprotected BIC (black dots) and accidental BIC modes (red dots), based on the measured farfield images and a comparison with the simulation results including those presented in Fig. 1a. We note that the merging occurs at a ~574 nm by extrapolating the wavelength of the accidental BIC mode. Similar features are exhibited by the other samples with slightly different structural parameters (Supplementary Fig. 7).
To further investigate the optical properties of the symmetryprotected BIC laser, we compare the measured farfield images before merging (a = 568 and 571 nm) with those after merging (a = 574 and 578 nm) (Fig. 3c). The shapes of the lasing modes are identical, whereas the mode size decreases as the lattice constant increases and remains unchanged after merging. For more detailed quantitative analysis, we estimate the angle from the center to the first intensity maximum in eight measured farfield images (see “Methods” section). The change in the mode size is clearly shown in Fig. 3e (black dots). The angle decreases from ~4.9° to ~3.7° until a = 574 nm and remains almost constant at a ≥ 574 nm. In fact, the size of the farfield image depends on the mode size in the near field^{28}. Thus, by comparing the sizes of the measured and simulated farfield images, one can estimate the effective number of air holes (N) in the photonic crystal structure for the excitation of the corresponding nearfield image. Our numerical simulations show that the structures with N = 19, 23, 27, and 27 yields the measured farfield images in Fig. 3c (left to right in Fig. 3d). A more systematic comparison between the measurement and simulation is shown in Fig. 3e, where the red dashed lines indicate the simulation results. Therefore, in the evolution from beforemerging to aftermerging, we observe that the aftermerging BIC mode is lasing with a larger effective N.
We term this BIC mode at a ≥ 574 nm the superBIC mode, as it possesses optical characteristics such as a single lasing peak and a shrunken farfield image that are distinct from those of the conventional BICs at a < 574 nm. In particular, the superBIC mode is confined more strongly by the effectively increased number of air holes. This unique feature is useful for improving the laser performance despite the effect of the finite size on the Q factor.
Lasing properties
We examine the lasing properties of all demonstrated BIC lasers. First, the lasing spectra and light in–light out (L–L) curves are measured in the accidental BIC lasers (Supplementary Fig. 8); their threshold values are much larger than those of the symmetryprotected BIC lasers (Supplementary Fig. 9). Next, we measure the linewidth of the resonant peak and L–L curves in the symmetryprotected BIC lasers more systematically by varying the lattice constants (Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11). Fig. 4a shows representative measured data for three different lattice constants. Clear lasing behaviors are observed at the lasing thresholds of ~448, ~340, and ~413 μW at a = 571, 574, and 578 nm, respectively. Linewidth narrowing is also observed, although the belowthreshold linewidth is small at a = 574 and 578 nm due to the high Q factor, which will be discussed in Fig. 4c. The threshold is much lower in the superBIC regime at a = 574 nm. This feature is shown more clearly in the plot of the threshold power density vs. the lattice constant (Fig. 4b). The threshold decreases significantly as the lattice constant increases until a = 574 nm and becomes almost constant at a ≥ 574 nm. Thus, the measurement indicates that the lasing threshold is minimized by the transition to the superBIC mode. We note that the threshold peak power of ~340 μW and threshold power density of ~14.7 μW/μm^{2} at a = 574 nm are the smallest among all the BIC lasers previously reported (Supplementary Table 1)^{5,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,29}.
To understand the ultralow threshold of the superBIC laser, we estimate the Q factor, λ/Δλ, where λ is the peak wavelength and Δλ is the linewidth of the peak at the transparent pumping condition at ~340 μW (see “Methods” section)^{30}. The Q factors are plotted as a function of the lattice constant using all the linewidth data in Supplementary Fig. 10 (Fig. 4c). The Q factor increases with the lattice constant before merging but is almost constant after merging because Δλ is limited by the spectrometer resolution of ~0.22 nm. The experimental Q factor has a maximum value of ~7300 due to the spectrometerlimited linewidth, although the actual value is much higher. The maximum Q factor of ~7300 is exhibited from a = 574 to 578 nm, where the lasing threshold is also minimized. Therefore, the enhanced Q factor in the superBIC regime is responsible for the significantly reduced threshold. We note that the effects of other factors such as mode volume and spontaneous emission factor on the threshold are not significant in the BIC laser with a relatively large mode volume^{13}.
Our measurements show that the superBIC mode has a higher Q factor than the other BICs before merging, as indicated by Fig. 2. The effective increase in the number of air holes confining the superBIC mode (Fig. 3e) further enhances the Q factor. The Q factor starts to decrease again at a = 579 nm (Fig. 4c), which indicates that the merging effect ends in this regime. This feature is more evident when the pump spot size increases (Supplementary Fig. 12). For larger pump spot sizes, the threshold values at a = 578 and 579 nm increase, whereas the superBIC laser still shows a low threshold (Fig. 5a). In particular, the superBIC occurs in a narrower range of lattice constants as the pump spot size increases, which is like the simulation result shown in Fig. 2e. Also, the superBIC regime from a = 574 to 577 nm agrees well with the regime of calculated high radiative Q factors. Therefore, the merging point at a ~ 574 nm is further clarified through the experiment performed with varying pump spot sizes. At a = 578 and 579 nm, the lasing mode turns into the isolated BIC.
Furthermore, additional laser properties are investigated in the superBIC regime (a = 574 nm). First, we measure the polarizationresolved lasing images by placing a linear polarizer in front of the IR camera (Fig. 5b). These images exhibit an intensity minimum along the direction of the polarizer, which agrees well with the previous report^{31}. Second, we estimate the spontaneous emission factor, by comparing the measured L–L curve with that obtained from the conventional rate equations (Fig. 5c). The estimated spontaneous emission factor is ~0.01, which is smaller than the values of ultrasmall nanolasers^{32} due to the relatively large mode volume^{33,34,35}. Third, the interference images are measured in the spontaneous emission, amplified spontaneous emission, and lasing regions in the superBIC laser (Fig. 5d and “Methods” section). The interference pattern is clearly observed only in the lasing region, exhibiting the calculated coherence time of >38 ps (ref. ^{36}). Fourth, we measure the decay times in the spontaneous emission and lasing regions of the superBIC laser (Supplementary Fig. 13). The measured decay time of <138 ps in lasing is fast enough for the highspeed modulation^{37,38}.
Discussion
We have demonstrated a superBIC laser based on a finitesize photonic cavity with a small footprint. We have observed a transition to the superBIC laser from the symmetryprotected BIC and accidental BIC lasers by tuning the lattice constant. The theoretical analysis shows that the radiation loss in superBIC follows the law k^{6} depending on the lattice constant and the superBIC keeps a high Q factor even in the finitesize cavity. Thus, the highperformance optical characteristics, including an ultralow threshold, a single lasing peak, and a high Q factor, have been measured for the superBIC laser. These features in the superBIC laser are distinguishable from those in the symmetryprotected BIC laser. Notably, its threshold is extremely low and is limited by the transparency value of the gain material, as a result of the low radiative loss in the finite photonic structure. Furthermore, the semiconductor active material with high optical gain well supports the superior optical properties of superBIC. Compared with other BIC lasers using similar gain materials (Supplementary Table 1), the threshold values we have measured are lower in the superBIC regime and similar outside the superBIC regime.
For the practical implementation of such an ultralowthreshold superBIC laser, it is necessary to develop a flexible and stretchable laser structure^{39} to vary the lattice constant and find the merging point more easily. In addition, electrical pumping should be performed: an efficient current path needs to be formed to inject carriers to the whole area of the BIC cavity^{7,40}. We believe that our findings will pave the way to significantly reduced optical losses in active nanophotonic structures with a finite footprint and the development of an ultralowthreshold light source for photonic integrated circuits, by controlling the topological charges in the reciprocal space and engineering the radiation condition.
Methods
Numerical simulations
The photonic band diagrams and optical properties of the resonant modes are calculated in a freestanding InGaAsP membrane using a threedimensional finiteelement method (FEM) solver in COMSOL Multiphysics. Floquet periodic boundaries and perfectly matched layers are imposed in the inplane and vertical directions, respectively, for the infinitesize structures (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figs. 1–4). The radiation loss (γ) is calculated by collecting the outofplane component of the Poynting vector away from the surface of the slab (Fig. 1b). Each radiation loss is normalized by the radiative loss at k = 0.275 (γ_{0}), where the fundamental TElike band is located near the light cone. The field decomposition into Cartesian multipoles (Supplementary Fig. 3) is done via the integration of the total field over the membrane volume within one unit cell. The topological charge is evaluated by integration of the polarization phase in the farfield domain over a closed loop in the kspace. For the simulation of the finitesize structures (Fig. 2), perfectly matched layers are introduced in all directions including the inplane domain of N × N size. The farfield simulation is performed using a circularshaped outer boundary to remove artificial interference patterns (Fig. 3d).
In addition, a homemade threedimensional finitedifference timedomain (FDTD) method is used (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 5c) to calculate the radiative Q factor and crosscheck the validity of the result in Fig. 2e, because FDTD can directly calculate Q factors in a finitesize cavity in the time domain by observing the time decay of resonant modes. The convolutional perfectly matched layer is used as an absorbing boundary condition in the FDTD. The size of the mesh grid is 10 nm, and more than 1000 periods of resonance oscillations are observed in the time domain to precisely calculate resonant wavelengths and Q factors. The Poynting vector is decomposed into inplane and vertical components in the slab structure, and the radiative Q factor is then obtained using the vertical component.
In the FEM and FDTD simulations (except for Supplementary Fig. 5), the hole diameter and slab thickness are set to 400 and 650 nm, respectively. Different structural parameters are examined in Supplementary Fig. 5. The refractive index of the InGaAsP slab is set to 3.4.
Device fabrication
The samples are fabricated using a 650 nmthick InGaAsP/1 μmthick InP/100 nmthick InGaAs/InP substrate wafer. The InGaAsP layer includes seven 7 nm quantum wells in the middle, whose central emission wavelength is ~1.5 μm. The InP and InGaAs layers act as sacrificial and etch stop layers, respectively. To define a periodic squarelattice structure, electronbeam lithography is performed at 30 keV on a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) layer coated on the wafer. The hole diameter is fixed at ~400 nm and the lattice constant varies from 560 to 580 nm. Chemically assisted ionbeam etching is performed to drill air holes in the InGaAsP layer while using the PMMA layer as an etch mask. Finally, the sacrificial InP layer is selectively wetetched using a diluted HCl: H_{2}O (4:1) solution at room temperature, and the remaining PMMA layer on top of the slab is removed by O_{2} plasma.
Optical measurements
A 980nm pulsed laser diode (2.0% duty cycle, 1 MHz period) is used to optically pump the fabricated samples at room temperature. The light emitted from the cavities is collected by a ×100 objective lens with a numerical aperture of 0.85 (LCPLN100XIR, Olympus) and focused onto either a spectrometer with an IR array detector (SP 2300i and PyLoN, Princeton Instruments) or an InGaAs IR camera (C10633, Hamamatsu). The spot size of the pump laser is varied from ~5.4 to ~9.2 μm using additional bulk lenses. The resolution of the spectrometer is ~0.22 nm. In Fig. 3b, the wavelength is taken just above the threshold of each laser to minimize the thermal effect. In the insets of Fig. 3b and in Fig. 3c, the farfield images are measured using a 4f system consisting of bulk lenses and a spatial filter. All the L–L curves and linewidth graphs are plotted as a function of the peak pump power.
In Fig. 5d, the Michelson interferometer setup is used to measure the interference images^{36}. The beams from the two arms of the interferometer are overlapped in time and space. In Supplementary Fig. 13, timeresolved PL measurement is performed using a nearIR femtosecond fiber laser (FemtoFiber proNIR, Toptica Photonics) with a repetition rate of 80 MHz and a wavelength of 780 nm. The emitted photons are detected by a superconducting nanowire singlephoton detector (Eos 210 CS, Single Quantum) and time tagger (Time Tagger Ultra, Swabian Instruments). In addition, we estimate the external differential quantum efficiency, ~1.2%, in the laser structure with a = 574 nm (Fig. 4a, middle). This value needs to be further improved through the optimization of the structure^{40,41}, although it is higher than those in smallsize nanolasers^{42,43}.
Data analysis
To accurately estimate the size of the donutshaped farfield image (Fig. 3e), we measure the average distance between the center of the donut and the position where the intensity is maximized. This distance is converted to the angle by comparing the farfield image with the reference image corresponding to a numerical aperture of the objective lens we used.
The experimental Q factor in Fig. 4c is obtained by λ/Δλ, where λ is the peak wavelength and Δλ is the linewidth at the transparency pump power. The transparency pump power L_{tr} is estimated using the conventional rate equation^{30}: L_{tr} = 1/η × ħ ω_{p} V_{a} B N_{tr}^{2}, where η is the absorbed ratio in the quantum wells, ħ is the Plank constant, ω_{p} is the frequency of the 980nm pump laser, V_{a} is the active region volume, B is the radiative recombination coefficient, and N_{tr} is the transparency carrier density. The nonradiative recombination coefficients are ignored. Using η = 0.24, V_{a} = 1.12 × 10^{−12} cm^{3}, B = 1.6 × 10^{−10} cm^{3}/s, and N_{tr} = 1.5 × 10^{18} cm^{−3} for our InGaAsP quantum wells, we obtain L_{tr} ~ 340 μW. In addition, to estimate the spontaneous emission factor of the superBIC laser (Fig. 5c), the logarithmic gain g(N) = g_{0} (c/n_{eq}) ln(N/N_{tr}) is assumed in the rate equations, where N is carrier density, g_{0} is the gain coefficient, c is the speed of light, and n_{eq} is the effective refractive index^{30}. The following parameters are used for fitting: g_{0} = 3000 cm^{−1} (ref. ^{44}) and n_{eq} = 2.3.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Code availability
The codes used in this work are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
References
Vahala, K. J. Optical microcavities. Nature 424, 839–846 (2003).
Hill, M. T. & Gather, M. C. Advances in small lasers. Nat. Photon. 8, 908–918 (2014).
Ma, R.M. & Oulton, R. F. Applications of nanolasers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 12–22 (2019).
Jeong, K.Y. et al. Recent progress in nanolaser technology. Adv. Mater. 32, 2001996 (2020).
Bandres, M. A. et al. Topological insulator laser: experiments. Science 359, eaar4005 (2018).
Ota, Y. et al. Active topological photonics. Nanophotonics 9, 547–567 (2020).
Hirose, K. et al. Wattclass highpower, highbeamquality photoniccrystal lasers. Nat. Photon. 8, 406–411 (2014).
Hsu, C. W., Zhen, B., Stone, A. D., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Bound states in the continuum. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16048 (2016).
Koshelev, K., Favraud, G., Bogdanov, A., Kivshar, Y. & Fratalocchi, A. Nonradiating photonics with resonant dielectric nanostructures. Nanophotonics 8, 725–745 (2019).
Kim, S., Kim, K.H. & Cahoon, J. F. Optical bound states in the continuum with nanowire geometric superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 187402 (2019).
Hsu, C. W. et al. Observation of trapped light within the radiation continuum. Nature 499, 188–191 (2013).
Yin, X., Jin, J., Soljačić, M., Peng, C. & Zhen, B. Observation of topologically enabled unidirectional guided resonances. Nature 580, 467–471 (2020).
Kodigala, A. et al. Lasing action from photonic bound states in continuum. Nature 541, 196–199 (2017).
Bahari, B. et al. Integrated and steerable vortex lasers using bound states in continuum. arXiv:1707.00181 (2017).
Ha, S. T. et al. Directional lasing in resonant semiconductor nanoantenna arrays. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 1042–1047 (2018).
Huang, C. et al. Ultrafast control of vortex microlasers. Science 367, 1018–1021 (2020).
Wu, M. et al. Roomtemperature lasing in colloidal nanoplatelets via Mieresonant bound states in the continuum. Nano Lett. 20, 6005–6011 (2020).
Yang, J.H. et al. Low threshold bound state in the continuum lasers in hybrid lattice resonance metasurfaces. arXiv:2007.03233 (2020).
Azzam, S. I. et al. Single and multimode directional lasing from arrays of dielectric nanoresonators. Laser Photonics Rev. 15, 2000411 (2021).
Jin, J. et al. Topologically enabled ultrahighQ guided resonances robust to outofplane scattering. Nature 574, 501–504 (2019).
Koshelev, K. & Kivshar, Y. Light trapping gets a boost. Nature 574, 491–492 (2019).
Kornovan, D. F., Savelev, R. S., Kivshar, Y. S. & Petrov, M. I. HighQ localized states in finite arrays of subwavelength resonators. arXiv:2011.11791 (2020).
Taghizadeh, A. & Chung, I.S. Quasi bound states in the continuum with few unit cells of photonic crystal slab. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 031114 (2017).
Droulias, S., Koschny, T. & Soukoulis, C. M. Finitesize effects in metasurface lasers based on resonant dark states. ACS Photon. 5, 3788–3793 (2018).
Liang, Y., Peng, C., Sakai, K., Iwahashi, S. & Noda, S. Threedimensional coupledwave analysis for squarelattice photonic crystal surface emitting lasers with transverseelectric polarization: finitesize effects. Opt. Express 20, 174–178 (2012).
Zhen, B., Hsu, C. W., Lu, L., Stone, A. D. & Soljačić, M. Topological nature of optical bound states in the continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 257401 (2014).
Wang, Z., Liang, Y., Beck, M., Scalari, G. & Faist, J. Topological charge of finitesize photonic crystal modes. Phys. Rev. B. 102, 045122 (2020).
Vuckovic, J., Loncar, M., Mabuchi, H. & Scherer, A. Optimization of the Q factor in photonic crystal microcavities. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 38, 850–856 (2002).
Shao, Z. K. et al. A highperformance topological bulk laser based on bandinversioninduced reflection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 67–72 (2020).
Park, H.G. et al. Characteristics of modified singledefect twodimensional photonic crystal lasers. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 38, 1353–1365 (2002).
Choi, J.H. et al. Lowthreshold photonicbandedge laser using ironnailshaped rod array. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 091120 (2014).
Khajavikhan, M. et al. Thresholdless nanoscale coaxial lasers. Nature 482, 204–207 (2012).
Baba, T. & Sano, D. Lowthreshold lasing and Purcell effect in microdisk lasers at room temperature. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 9, 1340–1346 (2003).
Khurgin, J. B. & Noginov, M. A. How do the Purcell factor, the Qfactor, and the beta factor affect the laser threshold? Laser Photon. Rev. 15, 2000250 (2021).
Kim, H., Lee, W.J., Chang, T.Y. & Huffaker, D. L. Roomtemperature InGaAs nanowire array bandedge lasers on patterned silicononinsulator platforms. Phys. Status Solid. RRL 13, 1800489 (2019).
Hoang, T. B., Akselrod, G. M., Yang, A., Odom, T. W. & Mikkelsen, M. H. Millimeterscale spatial coherence from a plasmon laser. Nano Lett. 17, 6690–6695 (2017).
Zhou, T. et al. Continuouswave quantum dot photonic crystal lasers grown on onaxis Si (001). Nat. Commun. 11, 977 (2020).
Noda, S., Fujita, M. & Asano, T. Spontaneousemission control by photonic crystals and nanocavities. Nat. Photon. 1, 449–458 (2007).
Choi, J.H. et al. A highresolution straingauge nanolaser. Nat. Commun. 7, 11569 (2016).
Crosnier, G. et al. Hybrid indium phosphideonsilicon nanolaser diode. Nat. Photon. 11, 297–300 (2017).
Sakata, R. et al. Dually modulated photonic crystals enabling highpower highbeamquality twodimensional beam scanning lasers. Nat. Commun. 11, 3487 (2020).
Jeong, K.Y. et al. Electrically driven nanobeam laser. Nat. Commun. 4, 2822 (2013).
Hwang, M.S. et al. Switching of photonic crystal lasers by graphene. Nano Lett. 17, 1892–1898 (2017).
Jang, H. et al. SubmicroWatt threshold nanoisland lasers. Nat. Commun. 6, 8276 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (2021R1A2C3006781), the Samsung Research Funding and Incubation Center of Samsung Electronics (SRFCMA200101), the Australian Research Council (grants DP200101168 and DP210101292), and the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Project 075152021589). K.K. acknowledges support from the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics and Mathematics “BASIS”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.G.P. and Y.K. conceived the research and supervised the project. M.S.H., H.C.L., and K.Y.J. fabricated the samples and conducted experimental studies. M.S.H., K.H.K., S.H.K., and K.K. performed numerical simulations and theoretical analyses. M.S.H., H.C.L., K.H.K., Y.K., and H.G.P. wrote the manuscript based on the input from all the authors. All authors contributed to writing and editing the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, MS., Lee, HC., Kim, KH. et al. Ultralowthreshold laser using superbound states in the continuum. Nat Commun 12, 4135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467021245020
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467021245020
This article is cited by

Radial bound states in the continuum for polarizationinvariant nanophotonics
Nature Communications (2022)

Merging bound states in the continuum by harnessing higherorder topological charges
Light: Science & Applications (2022)

Nanophotonic nonlinear and laser devices exploiting bound states in the continuum
Communications Physics (2022)

Topological polarization singular lasing with highly efficient radiation channel
Nature Communications (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.