Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Lentivirus-mediated gene therapy for Fabry disease


Enzyme and chaperone therapies are used to treat Fabry disease. Such treatments are expensive and require intrusive biweekly infusions; they are also not particularly efficacious. In this pilot, single-arm study (NCT02800070), five adult males with Type 1 (classical) phenotype Fabry disease were infused with autologous lentivirus-transduced, CD34+-selected, hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells engineered to express alpha-galactosidase A (α-gal A). Safety and toxicity are the primary endpoints. The non-myeloablative preparative regimen consisted of intravenous melphalan. No serious adverse events (AEs) are attributable to the investigational product. All patients produced α-gal A to near normal levels within one week. Vector is detected in peripheral blood and bone marrow cells, plasma and leukocytes demonstrate α-gal A activity within or above the reference range, and reductions in plasma and urine globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3) are seen. While the study and evaluations are still ongoing, the first patient is nearly three years post-infusion. Three patients have elected to discontinue enzyme therapy.


In Fabry disease, mutations of the X-linked GLA gene lead to accumulation of glycosphingolipids including globotriaosylceramide (Gb3)1,2 and globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3)3,4. This results in end-organ damage to the kidneys, heart, and brain leading to a decreased life expectancy5,6. Current approved treatments for Fabry disease include enzyme therapy (ET) and an oral pharmacologic chaperone (migalastat)7,8,9. Biweekly ET can reduce Gb3 levels in urine, plasma, and tissues but is intrusive, not curative, and progressive disease continues to cause clinical symptoms and a decreased lifespan10,11. Moreover, antibody formation directed against the recombinant enzyme occurs, which may affect therapy outcome10. The short plasma half-life12 requires biweekly infusions at considerable cost. Despite these issues, ET is recommended for treatment of Fabry patients to prevent progression in conjunction with nonspecific adjunctive therapies13,14,15. Migalastat is protein-variant specific, and therefore only available to a subset of Fabry patients with amenable mutations8.

Gene therapy, in theory, would enable Fabry patients to receive a single treatment that could be more effective than current options and free them from ET. Transduced cell populations that continuously produce α-gal A may be more effective clinically. As well, cross-correction may make Fabry disease particularly amenable to gene therapy; enabling systemic correction with a lower number of vector transduced cells16,17. Transgenic mice, with tissue α-gal A activity >10,000 times endogenous levels, were healthy and did not have altered cyto-architecture;18,19 thus high levels of α-gal A may not be deleterious.

In a pilot safety study, we have targeted enriched CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) for lentivirus (LV)-mediated gene therapy in patients with Fabry disease (NCT02800070, Fig. 1). Transduced HSPCs may deliver the functional enzyme to sites not accessible to ET. HSPC progeny may be a major source of Gb3 and lyso-Gb3; this may correct substrate accumulation at the point of origin. Use of autologous primitive HSPCs with conditioning may facilitate immune tolerance. We employed a recombinant LV with a self-inactivating LTR design and an optimized Kozak start sequence to deliver a human codon-optimized α-gal A transgene20. A single ex vivo LV transduction allowed for controlled dosing of the vector with a relatively low multiplicity of infection that should minimize insertional mutagenesis events20. We also utilized reduced-intensity melphalan conditioning, enabling outpatient management, fewer Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, and reduced cost. We report safety and outcome measures of the first gene therapy trial for Fabry disease.

Fig. 1: Study schema.
figure 1

Five men with Type I Fabry disease were infused with autologous transduced CD34+-selected hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells engineered to express α-galactosidase A (α-gal A) following mild ablation. ET enzyme therapy.


Patient enrollment

Male patients with known Fabry disease from the Canadian Fabry Disease Initiative study of ET were approached for possible enrollment. Seven male Fabry disease patients previously treated with ET, ages 29–48 years, were enrolled (Table 1, Supplementary Table 1); two patients failed screening tests associated with inclusion and exclusion trial criteria. Patients were followed from January 2017 to February 2020 for this study. Ongoing follow-up will extend until February 2024.

Table 1 Baseline patient demographics and treatment phase outcomes.

Study objectives

The primary objectives of this study were to determine the safety and toxicity of autologous stem cell transplantation with mobilized CD34+ hematopoietic cells transduced with a lentiviral vector containing human codon-optimized α-gal A cDNA in adult male Fabry disease patients. Several secondary objectives were analyzed including monitoring levels of α-gal A activity in plasma, peripheral blood leukocytes and bone-marrow-derived mononuclear cells, and measuring levels of Gb3 and lyso-Gb3 in plasma and urine. In addition, the transduction efficiency of CD34+ hematopoietic cells was assessed as well as the presence and persistence of marked cells expressing α-gal A in peripheral blood. An exploratory objective was also incorporated to track the levels of anti-α-gal A antibodies in recipients. The primary endpoint of this study was toxicity as assessed using the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.03. Because of the small sample size of this clinical study, there was insufficient power for comprehensive statistical analysis.

Mobilization and leukapheresis

During the pretreatment phase, ET was stopped for a minimum of 30 days prior to transplant. ET was stopped so that we could obtain a consistent cohort of baseline measurements. After cessation of ET, peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ HSPCs were mobilized using filgrastim in Patients 1 and 5, and filgrastim and plerixafor in Patients 2–4. Leukapheresis yielded 5.1–18.1 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg, with a final total number of 3.65–8.35 x 108 CD34+ cells (Table 1). The drug product yield was 3.1–13.8 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (Table 1).

Treatment phase

Enzyme activity, colony PCR, and VCN assays were performed on the drug product (Table 1). Prior to infusion, patients were administered a single dose of melphalan IV at 100 mg/m2 on Day −1. On Day 0, autologous CD34+ transduced cells were infused. Filgrastim (5 μg/kg) was administered subcutaneously daily from Day 5 until neutrophil count reached ≥1.5 x 109 cells/L. All patients (except Patient 3) restarted ET 30 days after infusion. According to a Health Canada-approved protocol amendment, all patients are eligible to discontinue ET. Two patients subsequently discontinued ET (Patient 1 at day 548, Patient 4 at day 214 after transplantation, respectively). A third patient (Patient 3) chose not to resume ET after transplantation.

α-gal A enzyme activity

Circulating α-gal A activity was first detected in all patients between Days 6 and 8 following infusion and attained reference range levels in all patients (Fig. 2a). Leukocyte α-gal A reached specific activity levels above the reference range (Fig. 2b). Both plasma α-gal A enzyme activity levels and leukocyte α-gal A specific enzyme activity levels decreased over time; yet the activity levels are above Fabry disease patients21 and have not returned to original baseline levels (Fig. 2a, b)22. Plasma and leukocyte α-gal A-specific activities mirrored each other (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Fig. 2: α-galactosidase A (α-gal A) enzyme activity and vector copy number (VCN).
figure 2

a Plasma α-gal A activity attained reference range levels in all patients; although decreased over time, the plasma α-gal A enzyme activity levels are above what is observed in Fabry disease patients and have not returned to original baseline levels. The reference ranges (dotted lines) were defined by Dr. Rupar’s laboratory based on 150 specimens referred for diagnostic testing. Males with classic Fabry disease have plasma levels around 1 nmol/h/ml. b Leukocyte α-gal A attained supranormal specific activity levels for each patient. Although decreased over time, leukocyte α-gal A-specific enzyme activity levels are above what is seen in Fabry disease patients and have not returned to original baseline levels. The reference ranges (dotted lines) were defined by Dr. Rupar’s laboratory based on 150 specimens referred for diagnostic testing. c VCN in peripheral blood reached between 0.55 and 1.10 copies/genome in all patients, and although decreased over time, has remained above 0.05 copies/genome in all patients to date (almost 3 years in Patient 1).

Vector copy number

The infused drug product vector copy number (VCN) ranged from 0.68 to 1.43 (copies/genome) (Table 1). The VCN ranged from 0.33 to 1.21 (copies/genome) in bone marrow (BM) aspirates obtained from each patient at one month (Table 1). PB VCN reached a range of 0.55 to 1.10 copies/genome in all patients and has decreased over time but has remained above 0.05 copies/genome in all patients (almost 3 years in Patient 1) (Table 1, Fig. 2c). VCN mirrored leukocyte α-gal A-specific activity (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Plasma and urine Gb3/lyso-Gb3 levels

Total plasma and urine Gb3 levels were variable, especially during the Treatment Phase. Plasma and urine lyso-Gb3 levels were reduced over time in most patients (Fig. 3). This reduction was sustained after discontinuation of ET in Patient 3, with the exception of urine Gb3. Increases in urine Gb3 levels were also observed when Patients 1 and 4 stopped ET treatment. Urine lyso-Gb3 also increased after Patient 1 stopped ET treatment. Plasma Gb3 levels in Patient 3 fluctuated after infusion, but rose at later time points. Plasma Gb3 and plasma lyso-Gb3 have increased in Patient 4 after this patient chose to stop ET. Data for the Treatment Phase for all parameters shown in Figs. 2 and 3 are illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Fig. 3: Total plasma and urine globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and lyso-Gb3 levels.
figure 3

Plasma Gb3 (a), plasma lyso-Gb3 (b), urine Gb3 (c), and urine lyso-Gb3 (d) levels are illustrated for each patient. Red arrow is at Day −30 when ET was stopped prior to mobilization. Green arrow is at Day 30 when ET was restarted for Patients 1, 2, 4, and 5. The orange arrow demarks when Patient 4 stopped ET at Day 214 and the blue arrow is when Patient 1 stopped ET at Day 548. Patient 3 chose not to restart ET.

Clinical parameters

Patients initially experienced a drop in weight during the Treatment Phase. In Patients 1–3 and 5, weights increased over time following transplantation (Fig. 4a). eGFR increased during the Treatment Phase in all patients (Fig. 4b). Following gene therapy, eGFR returned to baseline levels and was relatively stable in all patients, except for Patient 2. This patient displayed progressive chronic kidney disease with significant proteinuria (Table 1) during screening. Linear regression demonstrated that Patient 2 had the steepest eGFR slope, whereas the eGFR slope was near zero for the remaining patients (Supplementary Fig. 4). Proteinuria was also described in Patient 1 during screening (Table 1); 24-h urinary protein measurements confirmed this observation in Patients 1 and 2 (Fig. 4c). Patient 1 was described with left ventricular hypertrophy during screening (Table 1). Monitoring of troponin levels suggests that Patient 1 is displaying cardiac features of Fabry disease (Fig. 4d). Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) monitoring by MRI and ECHO revealed that cardiac hypertrophy observed in Patient 1 was relatively stable for nearly three years post-infusion (Fig. 4e). LVMI was also stable for Patients 2, 4, and 5 during the study period.

Fig. 4: Clinical parameters.
figure 4

Weight (a), estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (b), urinary protein secretion (c), troponin (d), and Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) (e) was monitored during the course of the trial for all patients. eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration formula. Values from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Echocardiography (ECHO) are shown for LVMI (e). Patient 3 did not attend all cardiac assessments and has been omitted from Fig. 4e.

Anti-α-gal A antibody titer

Anti-α-gal A antibody (IgG) levels increased for Patient 1 within 6 months post-infusion, before gradually declining (Fig. 5). Patient 3 had the highest titer at screening, which was maintained through mobilization and the Treatment Phase but decreased after 6 months. Patients 4 and 5 had low titers at screening, which dropped by mobilization (Patient 5) or after the Treatment Phase (Patient 4). Patient 2 had no detectable anti-α-gal A antibody.

Fig. 5: Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titer.
figure 5

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) were completed at each time point as shown. In four patients who had detectable anti- α-galactosidase A (α-gal A) antibodies, levels declined in three patients and rose in one patient, although the titers never reached the levels of a positive control sample collected following enzyme therapy (ET). Red arrow is at Day −30 when ET was stopped prior to mobilization. Green arrow is at Day 30 when ET was restarted for Patients 1, 2, 4, and 5. The orange arrow demarks when Patient 4 stopped ET at Day 214 and the blue arrow is when Patient 1 stopped ET at Day 548. Patient 3 chose not to restart ET.

Safety monitoring

No unexpected trends or safety events have been identified. The safety profile is consistent for patients undergoing melphalan conditioning for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (Supplementary Table 2). Two AEs (nausea [Grade 1] and cough [Grade 2]) were possibly related to the investigational product. There were 20 AEs reported of Grade 3 or 4 (Supplementary Table 2). Patient 2 experienced anorexia over 51 days corresponding to a lack of appetite (Supplementary Table 2) and this was assessed to be related to study procedures. All AEs Grade 3 or higher were unrelated to protocol treatment, but were related to the study procedures. Two SAEs were related to the study procedures (febrile neutropenia in Patient 4 and peripherally inserted central catheter line infection/thrombosis of the right arm in Patient 5).


In this pilot clinical trial of LV-mediated gene therapy in 5 men with Type 1 (classical) Fabry disease, all patients demonstrated a sustained safety profile. One patient is now out nearly 3 years from his infusion date. We chose a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for drug product engraftment, based on many years of transplant experience with melphalan in Toronto. Since there is limited experience with transplant conditioning procedures in Fabry patients, and Fabry disease patients have considerable comorbidities, we also wanted to establish whether mobilization and engraftment could be tolerated in this population. All patients received a low melphalan dose; 3 men (Patients 1, 4, and 5) received the treatment as an outpatient and returned home the same day. Full ablation regimens may require lengthy hospital stays and result in additional AEs23,24,25,26,27.

We demonstrated efficient LV-mediated gene transfer into enriched Fabry patient CD34+ cells. VCN levels were modest, minimizing the chance of genotoxicity. Our regimen led to increased circulating and intracellular α-gal A activity. All patients reached reference range levels. Values declined over time, possibly due to an exhaustion of transduced short-term repopulating HSPCs, but remained above what is typically observed in Fabry patients and well above pretreatment levels in all five cases. Whether the enzyme values reach an asymptote reflecting engraftment of transduced long-term HSPCs remains to be determined. VCN and α-gal A activities were well correlated, underscoring the fidelity of our therapeutic LV construct. Patient weight, eGFR, proteinuria and LVMI were stable for all patients throughout the study period (ranging from 12-33 months post-infusion), with the exception of Patient 2 who is showing symptoms of chronic kidney disease associated with his Fabry disease. Plasma lyso-Gb3 levels decreased in all patients with the exception of Patient 4 where an increase was observed. Plasma Gb3 levels were generally stable in all patients, except for increases at later time points in Patients 2 and 3. Urine lyso-Gb3 values were increased in Patient 1, stable in Patient 4, and decreased in Patients 2, 3 and 5. Finally, urine Gb3 levels were stable in Patients 2 and 5 who continued ET after gene therapy, but were observed to increase in Patients 1, 3, and 4 who elected to withdraw from their ET infusions. Interestingly, Patient 3 who chose to stop ET prior to mobilization had sustained low levels of plasma lyso-Gb3 and urine lyso-Gb3; a result of the gene therapy product alone.

It is possible that a more myelo-suppressive conditioning regimen would result in better engraftment of LV/AGA transduced cells—although this hypothesis remains to be tested. In selection of a partial myeloablative conditioning regimen, we considered that our prospective patients were relatively healthy males with Fabry disease who were receiving ET prior to recruitment to our trial. Unlike most other acute disorders that have been treated by gene therapy, Fabry disease is a chronic disease. As such, our clinical team and our regulatory body were reluctant to implement a full myeloablative conditioning regimen. Such protocols are more invasive, are accompanied by a greater number of adverse events, and have the potential for future oncogenic events. Likewise, infection of our target cells at a higher MOI or multiple infection courses may also lead to higher transgene expression; however, GMP-grade, recombinant LV was already limiting in our trial.

Host immunity to ET is thought to limit therapeutic efficacy; and, it is unknown whether gene therapy might exacerbate anti-α-gal A antibody responses. Each of the three patients (Patients 3–5) who had pre-existing anti-enzyme IgG antibodies had nearly complete elimination of titers after the gene therapy intervention without resurgence of levels despite continuous enzyme exposure from the transduced cell-derived source. Only one patient (Patient 1) had an onset of antibody titer to enzyme, which diminished over time. Two patients (Patients 2 and 5) remained antibody titer negative after gene therapy. We conclude that gene therapy is not only not highly immunogenic, but may also reduce pre-existing immunity to foreign ET.

If successful, LV-mediated gene therapy may result in beneficial outcomes for Fabry patients with a single treatment. No serious safety concerns were observed in our pilot trial. All Fabry patients in this study were responsive to the LV-mediated gene therapy at some level. Three patients have discontinued ET to date. Recipients had detectable levels of VCN in PB and BM, plasma and leukocyte α-gal A-specific activity above or within the reference range, and reductions in Gb3 and lyso-Gb3 levels. Gene therapy may be an effective treatment option in patients with Fabry disease but requires more study.



This multiple-center, single-arm, Phase 1 trial recruited patients from Calgary, AB; Halifax, NS; and Toronto, ON; from September 2016–October 2018. Prior to recruitment to this study, volunteers were screened and provided written informed consent. All patients consented to the release of deidentified data in this report. Patients were assigned a unique study identifier by Ozmosis Research Inc. All data presented within this manuscript have deidentified each patient and regional stem cell center. Recruitment (from September 2016 to October 2018) was restricted to men (age 18–50) with confirmed Type 1 (classical) phenotype Fabry disease (with GLA genotyping) who had received ET for at least 6 months prior to study enrollment. Inclusion criteria comprised an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), > 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration equation [CKD-EPI]) and left ventricular ejection fraction >45%. Patients with advanced Fabry disease were excluded. Additional eligibility criteria can be found in Supplementary Table 3. Criteria for ET withdrawal is indicated in Supplementary Table 4. The current version of the Health Canada-approved clinical protocol can be accessed in the Supplementary Data.

Lentiviral vector

The LV-AGA vector has been described previously20. Large-scale, high-titer clinical-grade, recombinant lentivector was manufactured, purified, and qualified by the Indiana University Vector Production Facility, Indianapolis, IN. A total of five patients were treated in this Phase I safety trial due to the quantity of the lentiviral vector produced for this study.

Study design

Patients were recruited to three regional hematopoietic stem cell centers (Calgary, AB; Toronto, ON; and Halifax, NS). All steps of mobilization, apheresis, conditioning, and transplantation occurred at the relevant site for each patient. Patients were initially mobilized with filgrastim (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [G-CSF] 16 µg/kg). If peripheral blood CD34+ counts were low (i.e., if the predicted CD34+ count was <50% of our target of 12.5 × 106/kg), filgrastim was supplemented with plerixafor (240 µg/kg). Three patients were mobilized with filgrastim and plerixafor; for one patient this occurred because of a site preference for this regimen. A backup graft of at least 2.5 × 106 unmanipulated CD34+ cells/kg was harvested from each patient for utilization in the event of graft failure. After apheresis, the nucleated cells were transported to the Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, for CD34+ cell enrichment. Cells were then transported to the Orsino Cell Processing Laboratory, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, for the lentiviral transductions. The transduction protocol was described in detail20. Quality control was performed: cell viability, evaluation of α-gal A activity in the transduced CD34+ cell population, and VCN were evaluated. After cryopreservation and safety/sterility testing, and an approved Certificate of Analysis from Health Canada, the drug product was transported back to the stem cell center of origin. Patients received melphalan (100 mg/m2) intravenously one day prior to autologous drug product infusion (Fig. 1). After we observed prolonged α-gal A activity in both leukocytes and plasma of Patient 1, the protocol was amended to allow patients to discontinue ET after an appropriate consultation/consent procedure. All patients are eligible to discontinue ET, and three patients have elected to stop ET at time of manuscript submission.

Safety and functional efficacy assessments

Safety endpoints included reporting of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), scored by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. Analysis of drug product efficacy included the detection of plasma, leukocyte, and BM mononuclear cell (BMMC) α-gal A activity20,28,29; analysis of Gb3 and lyso-Gb3 from plasma and urine by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)30,31,32; presence and persistence of LV marked cells in PB20; transduced drug product and BM HSPC as measured by colony polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay20; anti-α-gal IgG antibody levels measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (modified from Lee)33; clinical outcomes; and detection of VCN. The primers utilized for quantitative PCR are illustrated in Supplementary Table 5. All PB enzyme activities were measured in the trough period more than 10 days after ET administration and during the 60 days bracketing the infusion of transduced cells when ET was stopped. The reference ranges for plasma α-gal A activity and leukocyte α-gal A specific activity were defined by London Health Sciences Centre Clinical Biochemical Genetics Laboratory based on 150 specimens referred for diagnostic testing. Cardiac echocardiograms and magnetic resonance imaging was performed as described34.

Study oversight

The trial (NCT02800070, Health Canada-approved April 26, 2016) was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and local institutional and/or university Human Experimentation Committee requirements. Research Ethics Board (REB) approval was provided by University Health Network Research Ethics Board, Alberta Health Services Research Ethics Board, Capital Health Services Research Ethics Board, Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics and the Medical College of Wisconsin Institutional Review Board. This study was designed by the Fabry Disease Clinical Research and Therapeutics (FACTs) team. Clinical trial management was performed by Ozmosis Research, Inc., of Toronto, Canada. Clinical data were collected by the investigators of the FACTs team who were responsible for clinical assessments during the Treatment Phase and long-term follow-up. Clinical and laboratory data were reviewed monthly by the FACTs team. Clinical decisions and safety monitoring for each patient were completed by a Clinical Trial Steering Committee (CTSC) of the FACTs team. Safety review meetings were conducted by the CTSC 1 month after the transplant date for each patient. The next patient was then eligible for recruitment to the study only after the CTSC reviewed all of the safety data and unanimously concluded that there have been no treatment-related serious adverse events. A Data Monitoring Safety Committee (DSMC) reviewed clinical and safety data after the Treatment Phase for Patients 1 and 3. Interim analysis and publication of this clinical trial was authorised by the DSMC. As this is the first lentivirus-directed gene therapy trial to focus on adults with a lysosomal storage disorder, the DSMC supported reporting of safety data up to 1-year post-infusion of each patient.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. Brady, R. O. et al. Enzymatic defect in Fabry’s disease. Ceramidetrihexosidase deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 276, 1163–1167 (1967).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Platt, F. M., d’Azzo, A., Davidson, B. L., Neufeld, E. F. & Tifft, C. J. Lysosomal storage diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 27 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aerts, J. M. et al. Elevated globotriaosylsphingosine is a hallmark of Fabry disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2812–2817 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Auray-Blais, C. et al. Urinary globotriaosylsphingosine-related biomarkers for Fabry disease targeted by metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 84, 2745–2753 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Desnick, R. J. et al. Fabry disease, an under-recognized multisystemic disorder: expert recommendations for diagnosis, management, and enzyme replacement therapy. Ann. Intern. Med. 138, 338–346 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Waldek, S., Patel, M. R., Banikazemi, M., Lemay, R. & Lee, P. Life expectancy and cause of death in males and females with Fabry disease: findings from the Fabry Registry. Genet. Med. 11, 790–796 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eng, C. M. et al. Safety and efficacy of recombinant human alpha-galactosidase A replacement therapy in Fabry’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 9–16 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Germain, D. P. et al. Treatment of Fabry’s disease with the pharmacologic chaperone migalastat. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 545–555 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schiffmann, R. et al. Enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 285, 2743–2749 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. El Dib, R. et al. Enzyme replacement therapy for Anderson-Fabry disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 7, CD006663 (2016).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rombach, S. M. et al. Long term enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease: effectiveness on kidney, heart and brain. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 8, 47 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eng, C. M. et al. A phase 1/2 clinical trial of enzyme replacement in Fabry disease: pharmacokinetic, substrate clearance, and safety studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 68, 711–722 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biegstraaten, M. et al. Recommendations for initiation and cessation of enzyme replacement therapy in patients with Fabry disease: the European Fabry Working Group consensus document. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 10, 36 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ortiz, A. et al. Fabry disease revisited: management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol. Genet. Metab. 123, 416–427 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wanner, C. et al. European expert consensus statement on therapeutic goals in Fabry disease. Mol. Genet. Metab. 124, 189–203 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Medin, J. A. et al. Correction in trans for Fabry disease: expression, secretion and uptake of alpha-galactosidase A in patient-derived cells driven by a high-titer recombinant retroviral vector. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7917–7922 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Takenaka, T., Qin, G., Brady, R. O. & Medin, J. A. Circulating alpha-galactosidase A derived from transduced bone marrow cells: relevance for corrective gene transfer for Fabry disease. Hum. Gene Ther. 10, 1931–1939 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ashley, G. A., Desnick, R. J., Gordon, R. E. & Gordon, J. W. High overexpression of the human alpha-galactosidase A gene driven by its promoter in transgenic mice: implications for the treatment of Fabry disease. J. Invest. Med. 50, 185–192 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kase, R. et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of transgenic mice highly expressing human lysosomal alpha-galactosidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1406, 260–266 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, J. et al. Lentivector iterations and pre-clinical scale-up/toxicity testing: targeting mobilized CD34(+) cells for correction of Fabry disease. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 5, 241–258 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maruyama, H. et al. Effectiveness of plasma lyso-Gb3 as a biomarker for selecting high-risk patients with Fabry disease from multispecialty clinics for genetic analysis. Genet. Med. 21, 44–52 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Politei, J., Schenone, A. B., Cabrera, G., Heguilen, R. & Szlago, M. Fabry disease and enzyme replacement therapy in classic patients with same mutation: different formulations–different outcome? Clin. Genet. 89, 88–92 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biffi, A. et al. Lentiviral hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy benefits metachromatic leukodystrophy. Science 341, 1233158 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boztug, K. et al. Stem-cell gene therapy for the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1918–1927 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ribeil, J. A. et al. Gene therapy in a patient with sickle cell disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 848–855 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Thompson, A. A. et al. Gene therapy in patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 1479–1493 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferrua, F. et al. Lentiviral haemopoietic stem/progenitor cell gene therapy for treatment of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome: interim results of a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1/2 clinical study. Lancet Haematol. 6, e239–e253 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshimitsu, M. et al. Correction of cardiac abnormalities in Fabry mice by direct intraventricular injection of a recombinant lentiviral vector that engineers expression of alpha-galactosidase A. Circ. J. 70, 1503–1508 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Skoog, W. A. & Beck, W. S. Studies on the fibrinogen, dextran and phytohemagglutinin methods of isolating leukocytes. Blood 11, 436–454 (1956).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Auray-Blais, C. et al. Urinary biomarker investigation in children with Fabry disease using tandem mass spectrometry. Clin. Chim. Acta 438, 195–204 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boutin, M. & Auray-Blais, C. Multiplex tandem mass spectrometry analysis of novel plasma lyso-Gb(3)-related analogues in Fabry disease. Anal. Chem. 86, 3476–3483 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lavoie, P., Boutin, M. & Auray-Blais, C. Multiplex analysis of novel urinary lyso-Gb3-related biomarkers for Fabry disease by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 85, 1743–1752 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee, C. J., Fan, X., Guo, X. & Medin, J. A. Promoter-specific lentivectors for long-term, cardiac-directed therapy of Fabry disease. J. Cardiol. 57, 115–122 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hazari, H. et al. Comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy in Fabry disease. Can. J. Cardiol. 34, 1041–1047 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kurtzberg J. et al. Placental blood as a source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation into unrelated recipients. N. Engl. J. Med. 335(3), 157–166 (1996).

Download references


We thank the patients for their commitment to the project. We thank Cindy Yau, Rupi Mangat, Sarah Young, and Pam Degendorfer from Ozmosis Research, Inc., for their support of the trial. From the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, we acknowledge Andrew Daly and John Klassen for inpatient care to all stem cell transplant recipients. We acknowledge Kathleen Estes who is managed by Donna Simcoe of Simcoe Consultants, Inc. for help with medical writing. Funding for writing support was provided by AVROBIO, Inc who did not contribute to the content and only provided an administrative review of the final manuscript. We made final decisions regarding all content. The following institutions provided funding for this study: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR, grant number 119187), The Kidney Foundation of Canada, and the MACC Fund. Financial support for the study was also provided by AVROBIO, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



α-gal A enzymatic assays were performed by the London Health Sciences Centre Clinical Biochemical Genetics Laboratory, London, ON (J.W.R. and C.A.R.). Gb3 and lyso-Gb3 analyses were performed at the Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC (M.B. and C.A.-B.). Vector copy number assays and ELISAs to measure anti-α-gal IgG antibodies were performed at the University Health Network, Toronto, ON (J.H., K.G., D.L.B., and J.A.M.), and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI (K.G., W.M.M., and J.A.M.). The FACTs team had confidential access to the data through the trial management company. The sponsor (University Health Network) played no role in the study design, data collection and analyses, or drafting of the manuscript. A.K., D.L.B., J.H., C.A.R., C.A.-.B., W.M.M., D.H.F., A.K., M.L.W., R.F., and J.A.M. participated in research design. Research was performed by A.K., D.L.B., J.H., C.A.R., J.W.R., C.A.-B., M.B., P.O., K.G., W.M.M., G.F., S.W., K.L., S.J., A.C., N.P., C.F.M., S.C., P.R.D., D.H.F., A.K., M.L.W., R.F., and J.A.M. Data were analyzed by A.K., D.L.B., J.H., C.A.R., J.W.R., C.A.-B., M.B., K.G., W.M.M., D.H.F., A.K., M.L.W., R.F., and J.A.M. J.A.M. and D.L.B. wrote the manuscript and it was reviewed by A.K., C.A.R., C.A.-B., D.H.F., A.K., M.L.W., and R.F. All authors approved the final manuscript before publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Medin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.K. received grants, consulting fees, revenue distribution agreement, speaker fees and travel support with AVROBIO, Inc. as well as revenue distribution agreement with University Health Network regarding gene therapy using technology from this work. D.L.B. and J.H. were partially paid from a Sponsored Research Agreement—AVROBIO, Inc. C. A. Rupar has the following financial relationships to disclose: the Biochemical Genetics clinical diagnostic laboratory at his home institution is contracted by AVROBIO, Inc. to assay enzymes on a fee for service basis. He is the laboratory director but receives no personal compensation. C.A.-B. has received a service contract and honoraria for biomarker analysis with AVROBIO, Inc., grant from CIHR. K.G. had travel paid for by AVROBIO, Inc. S.W. has received nonfinancial support from Sanofi-Genzyme, nonfinancial support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals (formerly Shire HGT), personal fees and nonfinancial support from Amicus Therapeutics. K.L. has received travel grant and honorarium from Amicus Therapies; travel grant and speaker fees from Sanofi-Genzyme; travel grant, consulting fees and speaker fees from Takeda Pharmaceuticals; medical advisor to the Canadian Fabry Disease Association. C.F.M. has received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals (previously Shire HGT), grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Sanofi-Genzyme, nonfinancial support from Amicus Therapeutics. A.K. has received consultancy fees from AVROBIO, Inc. unrelated to this study. M.L.W. has received research grants, consulting fees, speaker fees and travel support with Amicus Therapeutics, Protalix, Sanofi-Genzyme and Takeda, revenue distribution agreement with University Health Network regarding gene therapy using technology from this work. J.A.M. has the following financial relationships to disclose: SAB—Rapa Therapeutics. Honoraria—Sanofi-Genzyme, Shire. Co-Founder—AVROBIO, Inc. Shareholder—AVROBIO, Inc. Grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Kidney Foundation of Canada and AVROBIO, Inc. M.B., A.C., P.R.D., R.F., D.H.F., G.F., S.J., W.M.M., P.O., N.P., and J.W.R. have no financial relationships to disclose in relation to this trial.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Christina Yap, Juan Bueren and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, A., Barber, D.L., Huang, J. et al. Lentivirus-mediated gene therapy for Fabry disease. Nat Commun 12, 1178 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing