Abstract
Despite the fact that GeTe is known to be a very interesting material for applications in thermoelectrics and for phase-change memories, the knowledge on its low-temperature transport properties is only limited. We report on phase-coherent phenomena in the magnetotransport of GeTe nanowires. From universal conductance fluctuations measured on GeTe nanowires with Au contacts, a phase-coherence length of about 280 nm at 0.5 K is determined. The distinct phase-coherence is confirmed by the observation of Aharonov–Bohm type oscillations for parallel magnetic fields. We interpret the occurrence of these magnetic flux-periodic oscillations by the formation of a tubular hole accumulation layer. For Nb/GeTe-nanowire/Nb Josephson junctions we obtained a critical current of 0.2 μA at 0.4 K. By applying a perpendicular magnetic field the critical current decreases monotonously with increasing field, whereas in a parallel field the critical current oscillates with a period of the magnetic flux quantum confirming the presence of a tubular hole channel.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In the past decades, GeTe-based alloys attracted an increasing interest for their applications in optical data storage and phase change memories due to a reversible rapid transformation between amorphous and crystalline phase1,2, and a large contrast of optical constants and electrical conductivity for the two phases3. In addition, GeTe-rich alloys can be used in intermediate temperature thermoelectric applications for converting waste heat to electrical energy because of their high thermoelectric performance, high thermal and mechanical stability4,5. From the fundamental physics perspective it is important to unravel its intrinsic property governed by the unique metavalent bonding and to shed light on the microscopic mechanisms that contribute to its phase change property6.
Pristine GeTe is a p-type semiconductor with a trigonal ferroelectric phase (space group R3m, No. 160) and an indirect band gap of Eg ~ 0.61 eV4,7,8,9. Only recently it was recognized that its trigonal ferroelectric phase makes this material very attractive for spinelectronic applications8. This is due to the fact that the non-centrosymmetric structure with displaced adjacent Ge and Te layers along the [111] direction exhibit a net dielectric polarization. The inversion symmetry breaking as a result of the displacement leads to a giant Rashba spin splitting of the bulk bands in GeTe8,10,11,12. In fact, photoemission spectroscopy measurements confirmed the Rashba band splitting as well as the corresponding spin polarization13,14,15,16. As a further verification of the presence of Rashba spin–orbit interaction, weak antilocalization was observed in GeTe layers in low-temperature magnetotransport experiments. In addition to spin-related properties GeTe is observed to be superconducting at temperatures below 0.3 K17,18,19. Recently, Narayan et al.20 have investigated the non-equilibrium superconductivity in GeTe Hall bar samples with a semiconductor-superconductor transition temperature of about 0.14 K and a critical magnetic field of around 70 mT. Last but not least, the combination of strong spin–orbit coupling and superconductivity makes GeTe a very attractive candidate for topological systems19,21.
To explore possible device applications the transport properties of quasi one-dimensional GeTe nanowires have been investigated. Here, it turned out that GeTe nanowires are very interesting as building blocks in phase-change memories22,23,24. However, to find out about the suitability of GeTe for the above mentioned spintronic and quantum device applications low-temperature quantum transport measurements on nanostructures are required. In order to do so, we have grown GeTe nanowires and measured the transport properties of GeTe nanowires contacted with normal metals as well as GeTe nanowire-based Josephson junctions. For the normal contacted nanowires we investigated phase-coherent transport phenomena such as universal conductance fluctuations, weak antilocalization, as well as Aharonov–Bohm-type resistance oscillations. For the GeTe nanowires equipped with Nb contacts the proximity-induced superconductivity as well as critical temperature and magnetic field of Nb/GeTe-nanowire/Nb Josephson junctions are studied.
Results and discussion
GeTe nanowires (NWs) were synthesized by a Au-catalyzed vapor-liquid-solid growth in a tube furnace with GeTe powders22,25. The as-grown GeTe NWs on a Si/SiO2 substrate are straight with a length of more than 5 μm. The cross section for the GeTe nanowires has a rhombic shape with a side length of about 80 nm (cf. Fig. 1a). A high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) image of GeTe NW cross section was obtained via aberration corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). In the corresponding image shown in Fig. 1b one can identify a trigonal crystal structure. The positions of the Te and Ge atoms are indicated by light green and magenta dots, respectively. For device fabrication the GeTe NWs were transferred to a Si/SiO2 substrate. Subsequently, superconducting (Nb) or normal-metal (Ti/Au) contact electrodes were prepared by using electron beam lithography and magnetic sputtering.
In order to investigate the material properties of the nanowires energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and Raman spectroscopy were performed. The EDX results shown in Fig. 1c reveal that the as-grown GeTe has an ideal atomic ratio of Ge:Te = 1:1 and the element component are uniform along the NWs except the nanowire ends with a Au nanoparticle, typical of vapor-liquid-solid growth. Furthermore, Raman spectra of a GeTe single nanowire demonstrate unambiguously that GeTe NWs exhibit rhombohedral phase (R3m) at room temperature (cf. Fig. 1d). According to the group theory, the two peaks near 89 and 119 cm−1 are assigned to the first-order Raman-active modes E(TO) and A1(LO), respectively26,27. Theoretically, E and A1 relates to the bending modes of the GeTe4 tetrahedra and symmetric stretching vibration of the Te–Te bond, respectively28. Note that the peak labeled by the symbol (*) at around 140 cm−1 arises from surface oxidation29. Other peaks/shoulders may originate from the breaking of inversion symmetry due to vacancies, defects, and distortion of bonds30.
In order to gain information on the electrical properties of the GeTe nanowires we measured the magnetotransport of samples equipped with normal contacts (Ti/Au: 20 nm/100 nm). An electron beam micrograph of the contacted 80-nm-wide nanowire is shown in Fig. 2a (inset). The measurements were performed in a four-terminal configuration with the bias current supplied at the outer contacts. The width and separation of the inner electrodes is about 0.5 and 1.0 μm, respectively. In Fig. 2a the resistance as a function of temperature is plotted. One finds that the resistance decreases with decreasing temperature in the temperature range from 35 to 10 K, and then increases monotonously upon further decrease of the temperature down to 0.4 K. The temperature dependence corresponds to a metallic behavior, where the upturn in resistance for temperatures below 10 K can be attributed to the electron–electron interaction and weak localization effects31,32,33. No transition to a superconducting behavior is observed, probably because the lowest temperature of 0.4 K is larger than the critical temperature17,19.
Figure 2b shows the conductance G in units of e2/h with the magnetic field applied perpendicular to the nanowire axis (B⊥, θ = 90°), at temperatures between 0.5 and 5.0 K. Here, e is the electron charge and h is the Planck constant. Similarly to GeTe films19, a pronounced peak is observed at zero magnetic field which is attributed to the weak antilocalization effect. This feature originates from interference effects of holes in the presence of spin–orbit coupling. Indeed, for GeTe a bulk Rasbha effect in the valence band is theoretically predicted8,13. Furthermore, as discussed in more detail below, band bending at the surface in connection with according potential gradients may also result in spin–orbit coupling effects. The conductance traces shown in Fig. 2b reveal a modulation pattern, which can be assigned to universal conductance fluctuations34. Their amplitude decreases with increasing the temperature mainly due to the reduction of the phase-coherence length35. From the autocorrelation function of the magnetoconductance, given by F(ΔB) = 〈G(B)G(B + ΔB)〉 − 〈G(B)〉2, information on the phase-coherence length lϕ can be obtained34. Here, 〈…〉 is the average over the magnetic field. For quasi one-dimensional systems, i.e., systems with lϕ larger than the width of the wire, the correlation field Bc defined by F(Bc) = F(0)/2, is inversely proportional to the phase-coherence length lϕ: \({B}_{{\rm{c}}} \sim \sqrt{3}{{{\Phi }}}_{0}/(\pi {l}_{\phi }d)\), with the magnetic flux quantum given by Φ0 = h/e (see also Supplementary Fig. 5 in Supplementary Note 2)36,37. For the fluctuations measured at 0.5 K, we extracted a correlation field of Bc = 0.10 T. Taking the nanowire width of d ~ 80 nm into account we obtain a phase-coherence length of about 280 nm. The presence of conductance fluctuations and the fact that lϕ is considerably larger than the width of the nanowire confirms that the transport takes place in the diffusive quasi one-dimensional regime.
Figure 2c shows the resistance ΔR after subtraction of a slowly varying background as a function of a magnetic field B∣∣ applied along the nanowire axis. For this magnetic field orientation one finds a regular oscillation pattern with an oscillation period of about ΔB = 1.4 T (cf. Fig. 2d, inset). This is also confirmed by the fast Fourier spectrum of the measurement at 0.5 K depicted in Fig. 2d. Here, a pronounced peak is found at a frequency of 0.72 T−1, corresponding to the aforementioned period of 1.4 T. In addition, some features at 1.22 and 1.66 T−1 are present.
We attribute the regular oscillations to Aharonov–Bohm type oscillations38 originating from transport in tubular hole states in a conductive surface accumulation layer penetrated by a magnetic flux Φ (cf. Fig. 1e, upper left schematics)35,39,40,41,42. The involvement of phase-coherent tubular states is supported by the large phase-coherence length being comparable to the circumference of the nanowire. We assume that in case of our GeTe nanowire, the holes accumulated in the surface channel are supplied from surface states. In fact, such a surface accumulation layer is mainly observed for narrow band gap materials, e.g., for InAs. Similar but inverted as in the case of InAs the GeTe electronic band structure exhibits some lower valence band maxima43,44, which may be responsible for the charge neutrality level of the surface states to be located within the bulk valence band. As a consequence, a tubular hole accumulation layer is formed at the surface45. Owing to the hole accumulation the valence band is bent upwards at the interface (cf. Fig. 1e and Supplementary Note 3 for more details on the formation of the accumulation layer).
In order to describe the transport through the tubular hole channel with a rectangular cross section in more detail, we assume a circular cross section42,46. In both cases quantized states will be formed, where the wave function along the circumference has to match after a full cycle. However, in case of a circular cross section the state components perpendicular to the nanowire axis can be described by coherent angular momentum states, which can be ordered according to their angular momentum quantum number l of their angular momentum Lz. This simplifies the theoretical description considerably. In the presence of a magnetic flux through the wire cross section the energy eigenstates are given by39,41
with Ekin the kinetic energy along the wire, m* the effective hole mass, and r0 the radius of the tubular channel. The energy is periodic in Φ0 = h/e.
A schematics of the energy spectrum is given in Fig. 1e, bottom. In a ballistic picture the conductance is determined by the number of occupied hole channels above the Fermi level EF, e.g., three channels for a small flux (red dots in the schematics) and two channels for a slightly larger flux (green dots)39. Thus, when the magnetic field is increased, the number of occupied hole channels changes periodically with the period of Φ0. In the non-ballistic diffusive case, a similar flux-periodic modulation is expected as well47. However, it must be stressed that the actual presence of the Aharonov–Bohm oscillations does not depend on the hole concentration in the surface gas.
From the measured period of ΔB = 1.4 T of our nanowire we can deduce the expected area S encircled by the surface channel from Φ0 = S × ΔB, which results in a value of about S = 3000 nm2, corresponding to a diameter of approximately 60 nm for a circular cross section. For our nanowire with a width of 80 nm, we estimate an area of about 5000 nm2 assuming a circular cross section. Obviously, the expected cross section is smaller than the actual geometrical cross sectional area of our GeTe nanowire. The discrepancy may be attributed to the fact that the nanowire surface is oxidized so that the hole accumulation layer is slightly pushed inside. Furthermore, the radial component wave function usually has an extension of a few nanometers, which also leads to a reduction of the effective cross sectional area. As mentioned above, some weaker maxima at higher frequencies, i.e., at 1.22 and 1.66 T−1, are found in the Fourier spectrum. These features may be related to higher harmonics or to Altshuler–Aronov–Spivak oscillations comprising a h/2e periodicity48.
We now turn to measurements of GeTe nanowires equipped with superconducting contacts. The inset of Fig. 3a shows a GeTe NW-based junction device with Nb contacts. The nanowire has a width of 80 nm, while the width and separation of Nb leads are about 500 and 90 nm, respectively. The outer Nb leads are employed to apply bias current, while the inner pair of contacts serve as voltage probes49,50. Figure 3a shows the resistance R at zero magnetic field as a function of temperature. The measurement shown in Fig. 3a indicates that the Nb electrodes have a transition temperature of about Tc,Nb = 7.0 K. From the relation of the Tc,Nb ≈ 3.9, with kB the Boltzmann constant and critical temperature Tc,Nb, we estimate the Nb energy gap Δ0 to be about 1.2 meV at zero temperature51,52. Moreover, there is another drop in the temperature region between 1.0 and 2.0 K, which is assigned to the superconducting transition temperature Tc,NW of the Nb/GeTe-NW/Nb junction. The two-step feature has been observed before in Josephson junctions with a normal metal53 and a semiconductor weak link54 as well as in topological insulator-based junctions55. The normal state four-terminal resistance (RN) of the present Nb/GeTe-NW/Nb junction is about 355 Ω at temperatures above Tc,Nb.
Figure 3b shows the current–voltage (I–V) characteristics and corresponding differential resistance (dV/dI) curve measured at 0.4 K. At low bias currents a superconducting state is observed with a critical current of 200 nA. In the dV/dI trace modulations are observed, which we assign to subharmonic gap structure caused by multiple Andreev reflections, as described within the Octavio–Tinkham–Blonder–Klapwijk (OTBK) model56,57. As indicated in Fig. 3b, peaks corresponding to 2Δ0/3 and Δ0 are present, while in the region around 2Δ0 one only finds a broad indentation. Although relatively weak, the observed subharmonic gap features basically follow the expected modulations predicted by the OTBK model. Several reasons can be made out to be responsible for the dampening of the subharmonic gap structures. First of all, the finite junction length in relation to the superconducting coherence length can cause a weakening of the subharmonic gap structures58. Furthermore, in our structure the interface between the Nb and GeTe is laterally not sharply defined, i.e., the effective junction length might vary. This probably also leads to a broadening of the subharmonic gap structures. In addition to the regular subharmonic gap structure we also found sharp peak indicated by (1) in Fig. 3b. We attribute this feature to a parasitic superconducting switching event, probably due to some defect in the superconducting electrodes in series.
As a further step, the temperature dependence of the I–V characteristics is investigated (cf. Fig. 3c). Obviously, the superconducting range at small bias currents (indicated by a rectangle) shrinks and finally vanishes upon increasing the temperature from 0.4 to 3.5 K. The same is true for the step feature at around ±1.5 μA. Regarding the latter, the corresponding dV/dI traces as a function of bias voltage are shown in Fig. 3d for temperatures in the range from 0.4 to 2.5 K. One finds that the feature corresponding to peak (1) in Fig. 3b shifts towards smaller bias voltages and eventually vanishes at a temperature of 2.5 K (cf. Fig. 3d, inset). The strong temperature dependence confirms that this feature is directly related to the superconducting state.
Figure 3e shows the I–V characteristics of the GeTe-NW based Josephson junction in a small bias current range at temperatures ranging from 0.4 to 1.6 K. At 0.4 K the critical current Ic,NW is about 200 nA. As the temperature increases, the superconducting plateau diminishes and disappears at about 1.6 K. The according corresponding differential resistance traces are shown in Fig. 3f. The dependence of normalized critical current Ic/Ic(0) as a function of temperature are depicted in the inset of Fig. 3e. The temperature dependence of the supercurrent can be assigned to a metallic diffusive junction59. However, since no reliable data on the diffusion constant and Thouless energy can be obtained, we have refrained from a detailed analysis.
The Nb/GeTe–NW/Nb junctions were measured in a magnetic field in two orientations, i.e., parallel to the nanowire axis and perpendicular to the substrate plane. For the perpendicular configuration the critical field Bc,⊥ was determined to be around 4 T while for the parallel case we got Bc,∣∣ ≈ 5 T. (In Supplementary Note 4 measurements at various tilt angles of the magnetic field are shown.) Figure 4a, b depict the evolution of I–V and corresponding dV/dI characteristics of the Nb/GeTe–NW/Nb junction in a perpendicular magnetic field (B⊥) at 0.5 K. With increasing magnetic field, the supercurrent is suppressed and then disappears, as can be seen in more detail in Fig. 4a (inset). The features at around ±1.6 and ±4 μA found in the dV/dI trace at zero field shift towards zero bias upon increasing the magnetic field. The shift can be attributed to the reduced superconducting gap when a magnetic field is applied. As shown in Fig. 4c, we find a monotonous decrease of the critical current Ic,⊥ with increasing B⊥. A complete suppression of Ic,⊥ occurs at around 4 T. A similar monotonous decrease of critical current with B⊥ was observed in planar Nb/Au/Nb53 as well as in semiconductor nanowire based Josephson junctions52,60. It can be explained within the framework of a theoretical model for the proximity effect in diffusive narrow-width Josephson junctions61. Within that model the decay of Ic,⊥ can be described by53,61: \({I}_{{\rm{c}},\perp }(B)={I}_{{\rm{c}},\perp }(0)\cdot a{e}^{-b{(BS/{{{\Phi }}}_{0})}^{2}}\). Here, Ic,⊥(0) is the critical current at B = 0 T. The a and b are fit parameters and S is the effective area (80 nm × 90 nm) of the Nb/GeTe/Nb junction perpendicular to magnetic field. In the model we do not distinguish between bulk and surface contributions. The fit curve from theory (solid line) agrees well with the experimental data for fit parameters a and b of 1.04 and 0.27, respectively.
In the case that the applied magnetic field is parallel to the GeTe wire axis (B∣∣), the supercurrent is modulated when the magnetic field is increased, as can be seen in Fig. 4d, e. Furthermore, similar to the previous case where B⊥ was applied the peak features in the dV/dI traces shift towards zero bias upon increasing of B∣∣. In Fig. 4e the ranges where a Josephson supercurrent is present is indicated. The corresponding values of Ic,∣∣ as a function of B∣∣ are plotted in Fig. 4f. One clearly finds an oscillatory behavior of Ic,∣∣. The oscillation period of ΔB∣∣ is very similar to the period of the sample with normal contacts, as discussed before. Since the cross section of the nanowire is very similar to the previous one, we can deduce that oscillations of Ic,∣∣ are periodic with a single magnetic flux quantum Φ0 = h/e. We interpret the behavior by a Josephson supercurrent which is carried by coherent closed-loop states in the surface accumulation layer at the GeTe nanowire surface. As illustrated in Fig. 1e, bottom, the supercurrent originates from phase-coherent Andreev retro-reflections of tubular hole and electron states at both GeTe/Nb interfaces62. In each cycle a Cooper pair is effectively transported from one Nb electrode to the other one. In the measurements of GeTe nanowire with normal contacts, we found that the resistance was modulated with a magnetic flux quantum because of the periodic change of the number of occupied transport channels. In case of superconducting electrodes, the magnitude of the Josephson supercurrent is also considered to be determined by the number of hole and electron transport channels, hence a flux periodic modulation is expected as well. As a matter of fact, a magnetic flux modulation was found before in junctions based on GaAs/InAs core/shell nanowires41,63. However, in that case no clear supercurrent was observed and a period of Φ0/2 was found.
In summary, magnetotransport of GeTe nanowire-based devices have been investigated in a four-terminal configuration. The temperature dependent resistance of the normal metal contacted Au/GeTe-nanowire/Au devices reveals that GeTe exhibits a semiconducting behavior until 0.4 K. At low temperatures universal conductance fluctuations were observed which allowed us to extract the phase-coherence length lϕ being as large as 280 nm at 0.5 K. The weak antilocalization feature observed around zero magnetic field indicates the presence of spin–orbit coupling in the valence band. Even more, when a parallel magnetic field is applied regular Aharonov–Bohm type oscillations are found, which are attributed to the formation of a hole accumulation layer at the nanowire surface. In the case of Nb/GeTe–NW/Nb Josephson junctions, we observed a critical supercurrent of about 200 nA at 0.4 K. The temperature dependence of Tc,NW can be explained in the framework of a diffusive junction. With increasing a perpendicular magnetic field the critical current decreases monotonously. This feature can be explained within theoretical models covering the small junction limit. For magnetic fields applied parallel to the nanowire axis regular oscillations of the critical current are observed, which are attributed to a supercurrent carried by the surface accumulation layer in the GeTe nanowires. For future studies it would be interesting to find out if the transport phenomena based on a surface accumulation channel can also be observed in GeTe nanostructures with different geometries, e.g., zigzag nanowires or nanohelices22,25.
Our investigations showed that distinct phase-coherent phenomena can be observed in GeTe nanowire structures. The very pronounced and sharp weak antilocalization feature indicates that the corresponding spin precession length is very short, which implies that spin manipulation might be possible on a very small length scale8. So far, we could not discriminate between Rashba spin–orbit coupling originating from the potential gradient connected to the surface hole accumulation layer and the electric field due to the polarization in the bulk. In order to gain more insight in the contributions of the surface and the giant bulk Rashba effect, it would be very interesting to perform measurements on gated nanowires. This is also of interest with respect to the switching effect based on the ferroelectric properties of GeTe. All in all, the presence of spin–orbit coupling in combination with the superconducting proximity effect make these nanowires very attractive for applications in the field of topological quantum computation. In this context, it is also worth-mentioning that by combining GeTe with three-dimensional topological insulators in a superlattice the topological properties can be tailored21.
Methods
GeTe nanowire synthesis
The synthesis of GeTe nanowires are achieved by a Au-catalyzed vapor-liquid-solid growth. Firstly, the Si(100) substrates with a native oxide were cleaned with acetone, iso-propyl alcohol, and deionized water in an ultrasonic cleaning bath, and then treated in a piranha solution to remove organic residues. After that, the substrates were immersed in Au nanoparticles solution for a few min and rinsed with deionized water. Finally, bulk GeTe (99.99%, Sigma-Aldrich) was evaporated at the center of a horizontal tube furnace, and the reaction product was collected downstream on a Si/SiO2 substrate covered with colloidal Au nanoparticles. Specifically, the furnace was evacuated and purged three times with Ar gas. Then it was heated to 400 ∘C and persisted for 8 h. During this program, the Ar flow rate and the pressure in the quartz tube were about 140 sccm and 10 Torr, respectively.
GeTe-based device fabrication
In order to contact a single GeTe nanowire with Nb or Au electrodes, the as-grown GeTe NWs were transferred to a Si/SiO2/Si3N4 substrate with predefined markers for electron beam lithography. A two-layer (copolymer/950 K) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resist system was adopted to realized an ideal shape of Nb or Au leads. In order to obtain a transparent interface between electrodes and GeTe, the samples were exposed to an oxygen plasma to remove resist residues on the contact area. Before the deposition of the electrodes on a single nanowire in a magnetron sputter chamber with a DC power of 250 W, the samples were lightly cleaned by 45 s Ar+ plasma milling to remove native oxidation layers on the GeTe surface.
Morphology and composition characterizations
The morphology and chemical composition of the GeTe nanowires was determined by SEM and EDX, respectively. In addition, a cross sectional specimen has been prepared by focused ion beam techniques. High-angle annular dark field imaging in the STEM has been employed to investigate the cross sectional shape of the nanowires. In addition, the crystalline structure has been investigated by x-ray diffraction and Raman scattering. (In Supplementary Note 1 additional information on the sample characterization is provided.)
Magnetotransport measurements
The temperature and magnetic field dependent I − V characteristics and dV/dI curves were measured using a standard lock-in technology in a 3He cryostat with a base temperature of 0.4 K and a magnetic field range from −8 to 8 T. A four-terminal current driven geometry is employed to directly measuring the voltage drop across the inner section of GeTe nanowire between the nearest internal electrodes. The external pair of electrodes was used for current bias55. The differential resistance (dV/dI) is gained by superimposing a small AC current of 10 nA at 9.4 Hz on a DC bias current. Note that the applied bias current should be as small as possible to avoid electron heating and damage of the GeTe-based nanodevices.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study is available from the authors on a reasonable request. The source data underlying Figs. 1–4 and Supplementary Figs. 3, 6, and 8 are provided as a Source Data file from the Jülich DATA repository (https://doi.org/10.26165/JUELICH-DATA/M1IQVG).
References
Wuttig, M. & Yamada, N. Phase-change materials for rewriteable data storage. Nat. Mater. 6, 824–832 (2007).
Lencer, D. et al. A map for phase-change materials. Nat. Mater. 7, 972–977 (2008).
Guo, S. et al. Intrinsic evolutions of dielectric function and electronic transition in tungsten doping Ge2Sb2Te5 phase change films discovered by ellipsometry at elevated temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 052105 (2015).
Hong, M., Zou, J. & Chen, Z.-G. Thermoelectric GeTe with diverse degrees of freedom having secured superhigh performance. Adv. Mater. 31, 1807071 (2019).
Perumal, S., Roychowdhury, S. & Biswas, K. High performance thermoelectric materials and devices based on GeTe. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 7520–7536 (2016).
Zhu, M. et al. Unique bond breaking in crystalline phase change materials and the quest for metavalent bonding. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706735 (2018).
Park, J.-W. et al. Optical properties of (GeTe, Sb2Te3) pseudobinary thin films studied with spectroscopic ellipsometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 021914 (2008).
Di Sante, D., Barone, P., Bertacco, R. & Picozzi, S. Electric control of the giant Rashba effect in bulk GeTe. Adv. Mater. 25, 509–513 (2013).
Singh, D. J. Optical properties of cubic and rhombohedral GeTe. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 203101 (2013).
Picozzi, S. Ferroelectric Rashba semiconductors as a novel class of multifunctional materials. Front. Phys. 2, 10 (2014).
Bahramy, M. S. & Ogawa, N. Bulk Rashba semiconductors and related quantum phenomena. Adv. Mater. 29, 1605911 (2017).
Boschker, J. E., Wang, R. & Calarco, R. GeTe: a simple compound blessed with a plethora of properties. CrystEngComm 19, 5324–5335 (2017).
Liebmann, M. et al. Giant Rashba-type spin splitting in ferroelectric GeTe(111). Adv. Mater. 28, 560–565 (2016).
Krempaský, J. et al. Disentangling bulk and surface Rashba effects in ferroelectric α-GeTe. Phys. Rev. B 94, 205111 (2016).
Elmers, H. J. et al. Spin mapping of surface and bulk Rashba states in ferroelectric α-GeTe(111) films. Phys. Rev. B 94, 201403 (2016).
Krempaský, J. et al. Fully spin-polarized bulk states in ferroelectric GeTe. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013107 (2020).
Hein, R. A., Gibson, J. W., Mazelsky, R., Miller, R. C. & Hulm, J. K. Superconductivity in germanium telluride. Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 320–322 (1964).
Smith, J. L. & Stiles, P. Superconducting energy gap in semiconducting GeTe. J. Low Temp. Phys. 26, 101–110 (1977).
Narayan, V., Nguyen, T.-A., Mansell, R., Ritchie, D. & Mussler, G. Interplay of spin-orbit coupling and superconducting correlations in germanium telluride thin films. Phy. Status Solidi R 10, 253–259 (2016).
Narayan, V. et al. Long-lived nonequilibrium superconductivity in a noncentrosymmetric Rashba semiconductor. Phys. Rev. B 100, 024504 (2019).
Tominaga, J., Kolobov, A. V., Fons, P., Nakano, T. & Murakami, S. Ferroelectric order control of the Dirac-semimetal phase in GeTe-Sb2Te3 superlattices. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 1, 1300027 (2014).
Meister, S. et al. Synthesis and characterization of phase-change nanowires. Nano Lett. 6, 1514–1517 (2006).
Meister, S., Schoen, D. T., Topinka, M. A., Minor, A. M. & Cui, Y. Void formation induced electrical switching in phase-change nanowires. Nano Lett. 8, 4562–4567 (2008).
Longo, M. et al. Au-catalyzed self assembly of GeTe nanowires by MOCVD. J. Cryst. Growth 315, 152–156 (2011).
Yu, D., Wu, J., Gu, Q. & Park, H. Germanium telluride nanowires and nanohelices with memory-switching behavior. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 8148–8149 (2006).
Bragaglia, V. et al. Far-infrared and Raman spectroscopy investigation of phonon modes in amorphous and crystalline epitaxial GeTe-Sb2Te3 alloys. Sci. Rep. 6, 28560 (2016).
Shaltaf, R., Gonze, X., Cardona, M., Kremer, R. K. & Siegle, G. Lattice dynamics and specific heat of α-GeTe: Theoretical and experimental study. Phys. Rev. B 79, 075204 (2009).
Andrikopoulos, K. S. et al. Raman scattering study of the α-GeTe structure and possible mechanism for the amorphous to crystal transition. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 18, 965–979 (2006).
Pawbake, A. et al. Pressure-induced phase transitions in germanium telluride: Raman signatures of anharmonicity and oxidation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 145701 (2019).
Shalini, A. et al. Coherent phonon modes of crystalline and amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 thin films: a fingerprint of structure and bonding. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 025306 (2015).
Weyrich, C. et al. Growth, characterization, and transport properties of ternary (Bi1−x Sbx)2Te3 topological insulator layers. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 28, 495501 (2016).
Lee, P. A. & Ramakrishnan, T. V. Disordered electronic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287–337 (1985).
Bergmann, G. Weak localization in thin films, a time-of-flight experiment with conduction electrons. Phys. Rep. 107, 1–58 (1984).
Lee, P. A. & Stone, A. D. Universal conductance fluctuations in metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1622–1625 (1985).
Arango, Y. C. et al. Quantum transport and nano angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy on the topological surface states of single Sb2Te3 nanowires. Sci. Rep. 6, 29493 (2016).
Ferry, D. K., Goodnick, S. & Bird, S. M. Transport in Nanostructures. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009).
Beenakker, C. W. J. & van Houten, H. in (eds Ehrenreich, H. & Turnbull, D.) Solid State Physics, vol. 44, 1–228 (Academic, New York, 1991).
Aharonov, Y. & Bohm, D. Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory. Phys. Rev. 115, 485–491 (1959).
Richter, T. et al. Flux quantization effects in InN nanowires. Nano Lett. 8, 2834–2838 (2008).
Peng, H. et al. Aharonov-Bohm interference in topological insulator nanoribbons. Nat. Mater. 9, 225–229 (2010).
Gül, O. et al. Flux periodic magnetoconductance oscillations in GaAs/InAs core/shell nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 89, 045417 (2014).
Cho, S. et al. Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in a quasi-ballistic three-dimensional topological insulator nanowire. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8634 (2015).
Polatoglou, H. M., Theodorou, G. & Economou, N. A. Physics of Narrow Gap Semiconductors (eds Gornik, E. et al.) 221–225 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1982).
Jain, A. et al. The materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
Lüth, H. Solid Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films. 6th edn (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015).
Ziegler, J. et al. Probing spin helical surface states in topological HgTe nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 97, 035157 (2018).
Rosdahl, T. O., Manolescu, A. & Gudmundsson, V. Spin and impurity effects on flux-periodic oscillations in core-shell nanowires. Phys. Rev. B 90, 035421 (2014).
Al’tshuler, B. L., Aronov, A. G. & Spivak, B. Z. Aharonov-bohm effect in disordered conductors. JETP Lett. 33, 101–103 (1981).
Courtois, H., Gandit, P. & Pannetier, B. Proximity-induced superconductivity in a narrow metallic wire. Phys. Rev. B 52, 1162–1166 (1995).
Skryabina, O. V. et al. Josephson coupling across a long single-crystalline Cu nanowire. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 222605 (2017).
Carbotte, J. P. Properties of boson-exchange superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 1027–1157 (1990).
Günel, H. Y. et al. Supercurrent in Nb/InAs-nanowire/Nb Josephson junctions. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 034316 (2012).
Angers, L. et al. Proximity dc squids in the long-junction limit. Phys. Rev. B 77, 165408 (2008).
Kim, B.-K. et al. Strong superconducting proximity effects in PbS semiconductor nanowires. ACS Nano 11, 221–226 (2017).
Zhang, J. et al. Proximity effect induced superconductivity in Nb/Sb2Te3-nanoribbon/Nb junctions. Ann. Phys. 532, 2000273 (2020).
Octavio, M., Tinkham, M., Blonder, G. E. & Klapwijk, T. M. Subharmonic energy-gap structure in superconducting constrictions. Phys. Rev. B 27, 6739–6746 (1983).
Flensberg, K., Hansen, J. B. & Octavio, M. Subharmonic energy-gap structure in superconducting weak links. Phys. Rev. B 38, 8707–8711 (1988).
Cuevas, J. C., Hammer, J., Kopu, J., Viljas, J. K. & Eschrig, M. Proximity effect and multiple Andreev reflections in diffusive superconductor–normal-metal–superconductor junctions. Phys. Rev. B 73, 184505 (2006).
Dubos, P. et al. Josephson critical current in a long mesoscopic S–N–S junction. Phys. Rev. B 63, 064502 (2001).
Frielinghaus, R. et al. Josephson supercurrent in Nb/InN-nanowire/Nb junctions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 132504 (2010).
Cuevas, J. C. & Bergeret, F. S. Magnetic interference patterns and vortices in diffusive SNS junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 217002 (2007).
Kulik, I. O. Macroscopic quantization and the proximity effect in SNS junctions. Sov. Phys. JETP 57, 1745–1759 (1969).
Haas, F. et al. Quantum interferometer based on GaAs/InAs core/shell nanowires connected to superconducting contacts. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 33, 064001 (2018).
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH. HNF—Helmholtz Nano Facility. J. Large Scale Facil. 3, A112 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank Peter Schüffelgen, Tobias Schmitt, and Michael Schleenvoigt for helpful discussions, Herbert Kertz for technical assistance and Stefan Trellenkamp and Lidia Kibkalo for assistance during prepration and characterization. Furthermore, we thank the Helmholtz Nano Facility (HNF) for help with devices fabrication in its clean room facilities64. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62074058) and Shanghai Pujiang Program (20PJ1403600), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under the priority program SPP1666 “Topological Insulators”, the Helmholtz Association the “Virtual Institute for Topological Insulators” (VITI, VH-VI-511), by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy—Cluster of Excellence Matter and Light for Quantum Computing (ML4Q) EXC 2004/1—390 534 769, the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Nos. 2018YFB0406500 and 2017YFA0303403), and the Projects of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 18JC1412400).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.Z., J.K., and D.R. performed the transport experiments, J.Z., A.R.J., J.K., D.R., and G.P. fabricated the samples, P.L.T. and J.G.L. fabricated the nanowires by VLS growth, M.L., A.R.J., J.Z., and J.G.L. performed the structural analysis. J.Z., A.R.J., H.L., Z.H., D.G., and T.S. wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the discussions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Satyabrata Jit and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Tse, PL., Jalil, AR. et al. Flux periodic oscillations and phase-coherent transport in GeTe nanowire-based devices. Nat Commun 12, 754 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21042-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21042-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.