Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Direct allele introgression into pure chicken breeds using Sire Dam Surrogate (SDS) mating


Poultry is the most abundant livestock species with over 60 billion chickens raised globally per year. The majority of chicken are produced from commercial flocks, however many indigenous chicken breeds play an important role in rural economies as they are well adapted to local environmental and scavenging conditions. The ability to make precise genetic changes in chicken will permit the validation of genetic variants responsible for climate adaptation and disease resilience, and the transfer of beneficial alleles between breeds. Here, we generate a novel inducibly sterile surrogate host chicken. Introducing donor genome edited primordial germ cells into the sterile male and female host embryos produces adult chicken carrying only exogenous germ cells. Subsequent direct mating of the surrogate hosts, Sire Dam Surrogate (SDS) mating, recreates the donor chicken breed carrying the edited allele in a single generation. We demonstrate the introgression and validation of two feather trait alleles, Dominant white and Frizzle into two pure chicken breeds using the SDS surrogate hosts.


Poultry is the most abundant livestock species with over 60 billion chickens or 8 chickens raised for each human on the planet each year1. Commercial hybrid lines, which have been developed over many decades of selective breeding for meat or egg production, are most common and are extremely productive under controlled dietary and environmental conditions. Local populations of chicken that are genotypically, phenotypically and geographically distinct from each other hold nutritional, economic and cultural importance for smallholder farmers. Although their productivity is much lower than commercial lines, they are posited to be adapted to local climatic and pathogenic insults2,3.

Globally, almost 1600 distinct regional breeds of chicken are recognised4, and the utilisation of this diversity through the identification and validation of genetic variants for increased resistance to disease and heat stress will benefit both commercial and smallholder farmers5. The ability to efficiently transfer existing and introduce novel beneficial alleles into both commercial and traditional chicken breeds will aid ongoing efforts to validate disease, production and climatic adaptation traits in chicken for sustainable food production (reviewed in ref. 6).

Primordial germ cells (PGCs) are the lineage-restricted stem cell population for the gametes (sperm and eggs) of the adult animal. The chicken is one of the few species in which the PGCs can be isolated from the developing embryo and then propagated in vitro7,8. In vitro propagated PGCs can be used for the editing of the chicken genome and the cryopreservation of chicken breeds9,10,11,12,13. As the chicken develops in a laid egg, PGCs can easily be microinjected into surrogate host chicken embryos, which are subsequently hatched, raised and bred to produce offspring in which one-half of their chromosomes derive from the donor PGCs. A limitation of this strategy is that the gonads of host embryos contain both introduced donor PGCs as well as the endogenous host PGCs, reducing the chance that offspring from subsequent matings will be derived from donor PGCs. To improve the transmission of donor genetic material, it is advantageous to reduce or eliminate the host’s own PGCs. Sterile male hosts have been produced in pig, bovine and goat species14,15. In chicken, a sterile female surrogate host, a dam line containing a knockout of the DDX4 gene, was recently shown to lay eggs solely deriving from introduced donor female PGCs isolated from a rare breed of chicken16,17. Developing sterile male and female (sire and dam) surrogate hosts would permit the direct reconstitution of a pure chicken breed from exogenous PGCs through the mating of surrogate hosts and the simultaneous generation of offspring homozygous for any genomic variant introduced into the PGCs through genome editing.


iCaspase9 expressed from the DAZL locus selectively ablates the germ cell lineage in birds

We aimed to produce a surrogate host chicken line in which the germ cell lineage of both males and females could be conditionally ablated. The inducible caspase-9 (iCaspase9) protein consists of a truncated human caspase-9 protein fused to the FK506-binding protein (FKBP) drug-dependent dimerisation domain18. The chemical compound, AP20187 (B/B), induces the dimerisation of FKBP and subsequent activation of the adjoining caspase-9 protein leading to induced apoptotic cell death. iCaspase9 has previously been used as a cellular suicide gene for human stem cell therapy18,19,20 and to ablate cell lineages in transgenic animals21,22. We also produced a transgene containing the equivalent region of the chicken caspase-9 protein, aviCaspase9 (Supplementary Materials and Methods). To specifically drive the expression of iCaspase9 gene in the germ cell lineage, we used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) to target the iCaspase9 construct to the 3′-end of the last coding exon of the DAZL gene in in vitro propagated chicken PGCs (Fig. 1a). The chicken DAZL gene is a putative avian germ cell determinant and is highly expressed in migratory PGCs and germ cells in the embryonic gonad23,24. The iCaspase9 transgene was preceded by a 2A peptide sequence and followed by a second 2A peptide and a GFP reporter gene to mark cellular expression. Female PGCs were transfected with the constructs, and GFP-expressing PGCs were purified by flow cytometry 4 weeks post transfection. Targeted GFP+ PGCs were assayed for proliferation after addition of the B/B dimerisation compound. The growth of PGCs containing either the iCaspase9 or aviCaspase9 transgene was inhibited at nanomolar concentrations of the B/B compound compared with control PGCs targeted with a GFP reporter alone (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1: iCaspase9-mediated ablation of the germ cell lineage.

a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated recombination of an iCaspase9 and GFP reporter gene into the final coding exon of the DAZL locus. Red arrow indicates the guide target. b 500 PGCs targeted with a human iCaspase9 or a chicken iCaspase9 (aviCaspase9) transgene were cultured in the presence of different concentrations of the B/B dimerisation compound for 10 days. Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 3 (n = 2 for 100 nM). One-way ANOVA, *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 with respect to Dazl-GFP cells. c Day-10 embryonic gonads were examined for expression of GFP and SSEA1 immunofluorescence, n = 4. d Control and (e) B/B-treated iCaspase9 G2 embryos imaged at day 10 of incubation. Arrows indicate the embryonic gonads. *, autofluorescence in the underlying mesonephros. n = 5 for each genotype. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Female PGCs were sorted for GFP fluorescence and subsequently injected into the embryonic vascular system of stage 16+ HH (embryonic day 2.5)-recipient embryos of the DDX4 knockout chicken line. Female chicken ablated for DDX4 contain no oocytes post hatch and will produce offspring solely deriving from introduced female PGCs17. The injected embryos were sealed and incubated to hatch, then raised to sexual maturity. The wild-type and DDX4 female surrogate hosts were bred to wild-type cockerels, and the G1 offspring were screened for the presence of the iCaspase9 transgene. We observed no transgenic offspring from the wild-type host females indicating that the genetically modified PGCs could not compete with the endogenous PGCs. In contrast, 11% of the G1 chicks contained the transgene (n = 8 of 74) (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1). The iCaspase9 and aviCaspase9 G1 chicks were raised to sexual maturity and the G1 cockerels were mated to wild-type hens and G2 embryos were examined for GFP expression. GFP fluorescence was observed only in the gonads of developing male and female embryos which PCR confirmed were positive for the transgene. GFP+ cells were also positive for the germ cell markers SSEA1 and DDX4, indicating the transgene was specifically expressed in the germ cell lineage and gonad of the embryo (Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Figs. 2, 3, 4, 6). Different concentrations of B/B dimerisation drug were delivered into chicken embryos in ovo which were incubated and examined for both GFP expression and germ cell ablation. We observed that the iCaspase9 transgene was more highly expressed in the gonadal germ cells (Supplementary Fig. 4) and more effective for in ovo germ cell ablation than the aviCaspase9 transgene (Fig. 1d, e and Supplementary Figs. 57). Ectopic cell death was not observed in either iCaspase9 control or B/B-treated embryos several days post-treatment (Supplementary Fig. 8). iCaspase9 hens also laid eggs at a rate comparable to control age-matched hens indicating normal oogenesis was not affected by the transgene (Supplementary Table 3).

Removal of the dominant white (DOW) mutation from a white-feathered chicken breed

The plumage colour of local indigenous chicken populations shows great regional diversity and smallholder farmers value coloured plumage for aesthetic, cultural and economic reasons25,26. The dominant white (DOW) feather trait is fixed in the most common commercial layer chicken breed, the White Leghorn (WL), giving them their characteristic pure white plumage27. The DOW allele (I) has been identified as a putative 9 bp insertion within exon 10 of the PMEL17 gene, which creates a three amino acid (WAP) insertion in the transmembrane region of the PMEL17 protein28. PMEL17 is a melanocyte transmembrane glycoprotein involved in eumelanin deposition and fibril formation in melanosomes29. In chicken, the plumage of homozygote DOW WL chicken is completely white whilst heterozygote DOW birds contain a few scattered black spots in their feathers30.

The removal of the DOW 9 bp insertion from a WL chicken genome is expected to restore the underlying feather plumage colour in homozygous birds. We chose to address this hypothesis using the inbred MHC congenic (Line 6) research line of WL chicken. Sequencing of WL Line 6 chickens revealed that this line is homozygous for the DOW allele and Sex-linked barring B2 allele, which generates a barred plumage in female chicken (W/B2) and white-feathered males (B2/B2) (Supplementary Fig. 9)31. Thus, removal of the DOW mutation from WL Line 6 chicken should, in principle, generate barred feathered females and white-feathered males.

To selectively remove the DOW allele, we propagated PGCs from a single male and female WL Line 6 stage 16+ HH (day 2.5) embryos8. A CRISPR guide along with a high fidelity Cas9 (SpCas9-HF1) and a ssODN donor template containing the wild-type PMEL17 sequence, were transfected into the PGC cultures. Distinct 95 bp ssODN donor templates were used for transfection of the female and male PGC cultures with the purpose of tracking the parental derived alleles in the G1 generation. These templates differed by a single synonymous nucleotide change which was introduced into the female PGCs, whereas the wild-type PMEL17 nucleotide sequence was introduced into the male PGCs (see Supplementary Table 4 for ssODN sequences). After clonal isolation and culture, an edited wild-type allele (PMEL17-WAP) was identified in ~50% of PGCs clones in both male and female PGC lines. Unexpectedly, in most male and female clones the second PMEL17 allele contained an identical and novel 15 bp deletion adjacent to the Cas9 cut site (Fig. 2a). This deletion removes the guide binding site and creates a five amino acid in-frame deletion in the transmembrane domain whilst leaving the PAM sequence and the DOW insertion allele intact (PMEL17Del+WAP). This deletion was identified to occur at this Cas9 cleavage site by microhomology-mediated repair predictors32,33. PCR analysis of five potential off-target sites in a PMEL17Del+WAP edited clone and resulting offspring (see below) did not identify any novel off-target mutations (Supplementary Fig. 10).

Fig. 2: Genome edit to remove the DOW allele from a White leghorn chicken breed.

a PMEL17 locus containing the DOW allele (WAP insertion) within the 10th exon which encodes for the PMEL17 transmembrane domain (amino acids in black). Genome-edited PMEL17 locus removing the WAP (highlighted green). Genome-edited second allele creating a five amino acid Dun-like deletion (deleted amino acids highlighted yellow). The five amino acids deleted in the Dun allele are highlighted in blue. b, d Wild-type WL Line 6 chicks and adults. c, e PMEL17 edited chicks and adults; females (standing) were barred and speckled feathers, males (sitting) were white with black dots. All photographs of live birds at The Roslin Institute.

We used these PGCs to generate a PMEL17 allelic series containing the two edited changes. To directly produce genome-edited G1 chicks, we mixed edited female and male PGCs and co-injected these with B/B dimerisation compound into the embryonic vascular system of stage 16+ HH iCaspase9 and aviCaspase9 chicken embryos in windowed eggs (Fig. 3). The host shells were sealed and incubated until hatching (Supplementary Table 1). The iCaspase9 surrogate host chicks were raised to sexual maturity and directly mated to each other in natural mating groups; a process we call Sire Dam Surrogate (SDS) mating. Three independent mating groups were produced and fertile eggs were incubated and hatched (Table 1). All hatchlings from the iCaspase9 mating groups displayed a black plumage pigmentation (Fig. 2b, c). In addition, a PCR analysis did not detect the iCaspase9 transgene in any of the offspring (Table 1). When mature, the cockerels displayed a floppy comb that is consistent for Line 6 WL birds (Fig. 2d, e). Furthermore, a principal component (PC) analysis indicated that all offspring from the iCaspase9 clustered with control WL Line 6 birds (Fig. 4). In contrast, the aviCaspase9 surrogate host group produced many chicks with yellow feathers and PCR analysis of the offspring detected the iCaspase9 transgene, indicating the endogenous germ cells were not completely ablated in this host (Table 1). The egg lay rate and fertility from natural matings for the iCaspase9 mating groups were high and similar to that observed for the aviCaspase9 mating group. However, the hatchability from the iCaspase9 surrogate host mating groups was lower than expected (~60%) in comparison to the aviCaspase9 group (82%). This suggests that the in vitro culture/manipulations of the PGCs may have lowered overall hatchability.

Fig. 3: Schematic of SDS mating.

PGCs are isolated and propagated in vitro from a pure chicken breed. After genome editing and clonal isolation, the male and female PGCs are mixed with the B/B compound and injected into iCaspase9 surrogate host embryos. The embryos are hatched, raised to sexual maturity then mated. Laid eggs and hatched offspring are from the donor breed of interest and contain the desired genome edit. Drawing by MJM.

Table 1 Germline transmission rates from surrogate hosts injected with donor PMEL17 edited WL PGCs.
Fig. 4: PC analysis of G1 offspring from iCaspase9 surrogate host birds.

DNA samples were genotyped on a 66 K SNP chip and analysed for PCs. Three chicken breeds were analysed: the brown layer breed which includes the iCaspase9 hosts, the LSX breed, and the WL Line 6 breed. Offspring from iCaspase9 hosts injected with LSX PGCs (grey) clustered with LSX control birds. Offspring from iCaspase9 surrogate hosts injected with WL Line 6 PGCs (green) clustered with WL Line 6 control birds.

The adult G1 birds displayed three colour phenotypes; (Fig. 2e) cockerels were spotted white, and hens had barred or speckled feathers. Sanger sequencing analysis and restriction digest genotyping revealed that the barred/speckled females had the genotypes PMEL17-WAP/-WAP, PMEL17-WAP/Del+WAP, PMEL17Del+WAP/Del+WAP (Supplementary Fig. 11a–c). The PMEL17-WAP/-WAP birds all contained a single tracking nucleotide, indicating that these offspring are descended from one male and one female PGC (Supplementary Fig. 11a). Crossing a PMEL17-WAP/-WAP G1 male and PMEL17-WAP/Del+WAP and PMEL17-WAP/-WAP females confirmed three feather colour morphs (cockerels, spotted white; hens, barred or speckled feathers) were present in the G2 generation which corresponded with the expected feather colour phenotypes. Breeding PMEL17-WAP/-WAP G1 males with Line 6 wild-type birds generated all white-feather offspring showing that the edited alleles were recessive to the DOW allele (Supplementary Fig. 12). This result suggests the length of the transmembrane domain is important for optimal function. The wild-type PMEL17 transmembrane domain is 25 amino acids (aa) in length, the WAP insertion increases this length to 28 aa and creates a dominant-negative protein. The naturally occurring Dun loss of function allele reduces the transmembrane length to 20 aa. Here, we restore the wild-type 25 aa length in the -WAP allele (PMEL17-WAP) and create a novel mutation resulting in a 27 aa transmembrane domain, PMEL17Del+WAP. Both of which restore eumelanin production as attested to by the dark barred feather female offspring.

Introduction of the Frizzle (FRZ) feather trait into a traditional European breed

Frizzled (FRZ) feather chicken is highly valued in Western Africa and this trait is posited to confer adaptability to tropical climates34,35. The FRZ feather allele (F) is a naturally occurring splice variant caused by an 84 bp deletion in the α-keratin 75 genes (KRT75) leading to a curved feather rachis and barbs36. Homozygote FRZ birds have severely frizzled and brittle feathers that are easily broken, however, heterozygote FRZ chicken display an attractive ruffled, frizzled feather phenotype. An autosomal recessive modifier gene (mf) that lessens the effects of the FRZ allele is present in many European chicken breeds, leading to a minor frizzled phenotype in young chicken and a crumpling of the barbs of the anterior flight feathers37,38. To produce heterozygote FRZ chicken, we first isolated and propagated male and female PGCs from eggs deriving from a flock of Light Sussex (LSX) chicken. The LSX chicken is a traditional dual-purpose British breed with black tail feathers and black stripped hackles39 (Fig. 5c). We again used high fidelity Cas9, SpCas9-HF1, and a 100 bp ssODN template to introduce the FRZ deletion into the KRT75 gene of female LSX PGCs. After clonal isolation and propagation, we found that 10% of the PGCs clones were homozygous for the FRZ deletion (Fig. 5a). A homozygous KRT75-edited female clone selected for the generation of FRZ edited birds was screened for potential off-targeting mutations. No novel mutations were detected in the five off-target sites analysed (Supplementary Fig. 13).

Fig. 5: Genome edit to introduce the FRZ allele into the LSX chicken breed.

a KRT75 locus surrounding the FRZ mutation. A single guide (blue) that targets cleavage 12 bp from the intended deletion was transfected along with a ssODN containing 50 bp homology on each side of the deletion. A sequencing chromatogram shows the bi-allelic deletion in female LSX PGCs. b PCR analysis of KRT75-edited LSX PGCs and G1 offspring from iCaspase9 hosts. The wild-type locus produces a PCR product of 657 bp. The edited locus produced a PCR product of 573 bp, n = 11. c, e Control 6-week-old offspring and wing (18 weeks) from LSX birds. n = 10/10 female birds. d, f FRZ heterozygote LSX G1 offspring (6 weeks) and wing (18 weeks) displaying crumpled flight feathers, n = 5 of 5 female birds. All photographs of live birds at The Roslin Institute.

To directly produce heterozygote FRZ edited LSX birds, we used the iCaspase9 surrogate host eggs and SDS mating. The homozygous KRT75-edited female LSX PGCs and wild-type male LSX PGCs were mixed and co-injected with the B/B compound into the embryonic vascular system of stage 16+ HH iCaspase9 chicken embryos in windowed eggs (see Fig. 3). The eggs were sealed and incubated to hatch (Supplementary Table 1). The iCaspase9 G0 host birds were raised to sexual maturity and naturally mated. Fertile eggs from the SDS matings of two independent groups were incubated and hatched. Egg laying, fertility and hatchability were appropriate for layer chicken and are shown in Table 2. PCR analysis of both embryos and hatched chicks found that all offspring were heterozygous for the FRZ allele, indicating that they were derived from a single wild-type male PGC and a single KRT75- edited female PGC (Fig. 5b). A PC analysis showed that the iCaspase9 offspring clustered with control LSX birds indicating all offspring derived from donor LSX PGCs (Fig. 4). The hatched offspring displayed typical LSX colouration and a feather phenotype representative of a modifier FRZ heterozygote; obvious FRZ feather phenotype at 4 weeks of age and the flight feathers were crumpled as adults (Fig. 5c–f).

Table 2 Germline transmission rates from surrogate hosts injected with donor KRT75-edited ♀LSX PGCs and wild-type ♂LSX PGCs.


Our results demonstrate the usefulness of sterile surrogate hosts in a bird species, producing pure breed homozygous and heterozygous genome-edited offspring by the direct mating of sire and dam surrogates (Fig. 3). SDS mating is particularly amenable to species in which the embryo develops ex utero, such as birds, fish, amphibians and reptilian species40,41,42,43. As the chicken is a model organism for the study of embryogenesis, neural development and immunity in bird species, this technique offers a reliable platform for investigating gene function and disease resistance in poultry. Previously the production of homozygous genome-edited birds has required a minimum of two generations44,45,46,47,48,49. As the generation time for chicken is 5–6 months, SDS breeding greatly accelerates the production of homozygous offspring for the validation of genetic variants and vastly increases the number of offspring containing the homozygote genome edit. Using genetic modifications to achieve sterility adheres to the principles of the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) as it reduces the number of animals required to generate the desired offspring and eliminates the use of chemotherapeutic reagents such as busulphan that are traditionally used to eliminate the endogenous germ cells.

The cryo-conservation of avian species is particularly challenging due to both the yolk filled egg and the difficulty in cryopreserving avian sperm. SDS mating bypasses these challenges permitting the regeneration of avian breeds directly from frozen reproductive material. Indeed, here we demonstrated the regeneration of two pure chicken breeds from cryopreserved PGCs: the White Leghorn and the Light Sussex. We also show that breed regeneration can be coupled with the introduction and removal of genetic traits. As fertile chicken eggs can be shipped globally between avian breeding facilities, in the future an edited chicken breed could be generated directly from fertile eggs without first establishing a breeding population of birds. However, SDS matings produced large numbers of full siblings deriving from the same male and female PGC genotypes. This could be useful for allelic validation as there would be reduced phenotypic variation between edited and non-edited offspring. However, chicken flocks are maintained as highly genetically diverse populations to avoid inbreeding which causes dramatic reductions in fertility and hatchability. It may prove necessary to multiplex multiple genotypes through single surrogate hosts in order to regenerate outbred chicken populations.


Chicken breeds and welfare

The MHC Line 6 congenic line of WL birds50 and the LSX dual-purpose chicken breed39 are maintained as a closed breeding population of 150 birds in the NARF SPF facility (UK) and provided fertile eggs used for PGC derivations. Individual Line 6 birds were sequenced to confirm the presence of the DOW allele and the absence of the recessive white allele51. The barred feather allele was identified in Line 6 by analysis of the CDKN2a locus for SNP2 and SNP431. The iCaspase9 lines of chickens were generated using Hy-line Brown layer PGCs. Heterozygous and homozygous cockerels carrying the iCaspase9 transgene were crossed to Hy-line hens to produce heterozygote iCaspase9 surrogate host eggs for injection and hatching. DDX4 ZZ heterozygote males were crossed to Hy-line hens to produce fertile host eggs for injection. All animal management, maintenance and embryo manipulations were carried out under UK Home Office license (70/8528) and regulations. Experimental protocols and studies were approved by the Roslin Institute Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board Committee.

Chicken PGC culture and transfection

PGC lines were derived from the blood of stage 15-16+ HH embryos and propagated in culture, as previously described in ref. 8. The embryos and PGC lines were sexed using a W-chromosome-specific PCR as previously described in52. Both male and female PGC cultures were derived from Hy-line, LSX and Inbred Line 6 WL embryos. Each PGC line was in culture for ~3 weeks before freezing in aliquots of 50,000 cells resuspended in 125 µl of Stem-Cellbanker (Amsbio) and stored at −150 °C.

For the generation of iCaspase9 birds; 1.0 µg of iCaspase9 or aviCaspase9 targeting vector and 1.0 µg of DAZL guide CRISPR/Cas9 vector were transfected into 1.5 × 105 Hy-line PGCs using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). PGCs were cultured for 3 weeks, and GFP+ PGCs were purified by flow cytometry using a BD FACSAria III Cell Sorter gated for GFP fluorescence. For CRISPR/Cas9 editing of KRT75 and PMEL17, 2 × 105 of LSX or Line 6 PGCs were transfected with 1.5 µg of CRISPR/Cas9 SpCas9-HF1 vector and 0.5 µg of ssODN donor template10. After 24 h in culture, the cells were treated with 0.6 µg/ml puromycin for 48 h to select for cells transfected with CRISPR vector. After selection, PGCs were sorted using the BD FACSAria III Cell Sorter into a 96-well plate at one cell per well After culturing for 3 weeks, clonal PGC populations were cryopreserved and used for genomic DNA isolation.

Production of surrogate host chicks

Targeted male and female PGC lines were thawed from storage at −150 °C and cultured for 5–10 days before injection into stage 15-16+ HH (day 2.5) surrogate host embryos in windowed eggs. In all, 1.0 µl of PGCs were directly injected into the dorsal aorta, and all shells were resealed with medical Leukosilk tape (BSN Medical) before incubating until hatch. For experiments using iCaspase9 surrogate host embryos, 1.0 µl of 25 mM B/B (in DMSO) (Takara Bio) was added to 50 µl PGC suspension (0.5 mM BB, 2% DMSO f.c.) before injection and kept at room temperature during the injection period. Subsequently, 50 µl of 300 µl Penicillin/Streptomycin (containing 30 µl of 0.5 mM B/B compound) was pipetted on top of the embryo. B/B compound was resuspended in DMSO instead of ethanol as ethanol proved toxic to the donor PGC suspension. Founder males and females were naturally mated in pens to produce G1 offspring. All offspring were screened by PCR for the presence of iCaspase9 transgene. See Supplementary Table 1 for details on individual experiments.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data that support this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The animal models in this study are available to licenced animal research facilities under MTA. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. 1.

    Ritchie, H. & Roser, M. (accessed 2020).

  2. 2.

    Melesse, A. Significance of scavenging chicken production in the rural community of Africa for enhanced food security. World Poult. Sci. J. 70, 593–606 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alders, R. G. & Pym, R. A. E. Village poultry: still important to millions, eight thousand years after domestication. World Poult. Sci. J. 65, 181–190 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.


  5. 5.

    Tait-Burkard, C. et al. Livestock 2.0—genome editing for fitter, healthier, and more productive farmed animals. Genome Biol. 19, 204 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ballantyne, M., Doddamani, D. & McGrew, M. In Advances in Poultry Genetics and Genomics (eds Aggrey, S. E., Zhou, H. & Tixier-Boichard, M.) pp. 1–17 (Burleigh Dodds, 2020).

  7. 7.

    van de Lavoir, M. C. et al. Germline transmission of genetically modified primordial germ cells. Nature 441, 766–769 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Whyte, J. et al. FGF, insulin, and SMAD signaling cooperate for avian primordial germ cell self-renewal. Stem Cell Rep. 5, 1171–1182 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Whyte J., B. E. & Mcgrew M. J. Increased Sustainability in Poultry Production: New Tools and Resources for Genetic Management (CABI Publishing, 2015).

  10. 10.

    Idoko-Akoh, A., Taylor, L., Sang, H. M. & McGrew, M. J. High fidelity CRISPR/Cas9 increases precise monoallelic and biallelic editing events in primordial germ cells. Sci. Rep. 8, 15126 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Woodcock, M. E., Idoko-Akoh, A. & McGrew, M. J. Gene editing in birds takes flight. Mamm. Genome. 28, 315–323 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Trefil, P. et al. Male fertility restored by transplanting primordial germ cells into testes: a new way towards efficient transgenesis in chicken. Sci. Rep. 7, 14246 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schusser, B. et al. Expression of heavy chain-only antibodies can support B-cell development in light chain knockout chickens. Eur. J. Immunol. 46, 2137–2148 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ciccarelli, M. et al. Donor-derived spermatogenesis following stem cell transplantation in sterile NANOS2 knockout males. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24195–24204 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Park, K. E. et al. Generation of germline ablated male pigs by CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the NANOS2 gene. Sci. Rep. 7, 40176 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Taylor, L. et al. Efficient TALEN-mediated gene targeting of chicken primordial germ cells. Development 144, 928–934 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Woodcock, M. E. et al. Reviving rare chicken breeds using genetically engineered sterility in surrogate host birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 20930–20937 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Straathof, K. C. et al. An inducible caspase 9 safety switch for T-cell therapy. Blood 105, 4247–4254 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gargett, T. & Brown, M. P. The inducible caspase-9 suicide gene system as a “safety switch” to limit on-target, off-tumor toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Front. Pharmacol. 5, UNSP 235 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Marin, V. et al. Comparison of different suicide-gene strategies for the safety improvement of genetically manipulated T cells. Hum. Gene Ther. Method 23, 376–386 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shimokawa, M. et al. Visualization and targeting of LGR5(+) human colon cancer stem cells. Nature 545, 187 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hamm, L. M., Tam, B. M. & Moritz, O. L. Controlled rod cell ablation in transgenic Xenopus laevis. Investig. Ophth Vis. Sci. 50, 885–892 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kito, G. et al. Temporal and spatial differential expression of chicken germline-specific proteins cDAZL. CDH CVH Gametogenesis. J. Reprod. Dev. 56, 341–346 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lee, H. C. et al. DAZL expression explains origin and central formation of primordial germ cells in chickens. Stem cells Dev. 25, 68–79 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chebo, C. & Nigussie, H. Performances, breeding practices and trait preferences of local chicken ecotypes in southern zone of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Asian J. Poult. Sci. 10, 158–164 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tadesse, A. & Tesfav, Y. Flock dynamics and composition of rural chickens in lowland and midland agro-ecological zones of central Tigray North Ethiopia. Livestock Res. Rural Dev. 25, 126 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Bateson, W. & Saunders, E. R. Experiments [in the Physiology of Heredity] (Harrison, 1902).

  28. 28.

    Kerje, S. et al. The dominant white, Dun and Smoky color variants in chicken are associated with insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the PMEL17 gene. Genetics 168, 1507–1518 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    McGlinchey, R. P. et al. The repeat domain of the melanosome fibril protein Pmel17 forms the amyloid core promoting melanin synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13731–13736 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Brandt, A. E. A note on dominant white and crest in poultry—flecks and comb shape make possible identification of heterozygotes. J. Heredity 27, 79–82 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Schwochow Thalmann, D. et al. The evolution of sex-linked barring alleles in chickens involves both regulatory and coding changes in CDKN2A. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006665 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bae, S., Kweon, J., Kim, H. S. & Kim, J. S. Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat. Methods 11, 705–706 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Shen, M. W. et al. Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants. Nature 563, 646 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Huxley, J. Evolution, the Modern Synthesis (G. Allen & Unwin ltd, 1942).

  35. 35.

    Adomako, K., Olympio, O. S., Hagan, J. K. & Hamidu, J. A. Effect of the frizzle gene (F) on egg production and egg quality of laying hens kept in tropical villages. Br. Poult. Sci. 55, 709–714 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ng, C. S. et al. The chicken frizzle feather is due to an alpha-keratin (KRT75) mutation that causes a defective rachis. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002748 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Hutt, F. B. Genetics of the fowl V The modified frizzle. J. Genet. 32, 277–285 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Landauer, W. A gene modifying frizzling in the fowl. J. Heredity 24, 153–156 (1933).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Roberts, V. British Poultry Standards: Complete Specifications and Judging Points of All Standardized Breeds and Varieties of Poultry as Compiled by the Specialist Breed Clubs and Recognised by the Poultry Club of Great Britain. 6th edn, (Blackwell Publication, 2008).

  40. 40.

    Yoshizaki, G. et al. Production of germ cell-deficient salmonids by dead end gene knockdown, and their use as recipients for germ cell transplantation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 83, 298–311 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Okutsu, T., Shikina, S., Kanno, M., Takeuchi, Y. & Yoshizaki, G. Production of trout offspring from triploid salmon parents. Science 317, 1517 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Blitz, I. L., Fish, M. B. & Cho, K. W. Y. Leapfrogging: primordial germ cell transplantation permits recovery of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations in essential genes. Development 143, 2868–2875 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Marinovic, Z. et al. Preservation of zebrafish genetic resources through testis cryopreservation and spermatogonia transplantation. Sci. Rep. 9, 13861 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lee, J., Ma, J. & Lee, K. Direct delivery of adenoviral CRISPR/Cas9 vector into the blastoderm for generation of targeted gene knockout in quail. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 13288–13292 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Aumann, D. et al. Analyzing gamma/delta T-cell function in chicken by reverse genetics. Transgenic Res. 25, 119–119 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Park, T. S., Lee, H. J., Kim, K. H., Kim, J. S. & Han, J. Y. Targeted gene knockout in chickens mediated by TALENs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12716–12721 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Oishi, I., Yoshii, K., Miyahara, D., Kagami, H. & Tagami, T. Targeted mutagenesis in chicken using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci. Rep. 6, Artn 23980 (2016).

  48. 48.

    Kim, G. D. et al. Generation of myostatin-knockout chickens mediated by D10A-Cas9 nickase. FASEB J.: Off. Publ. Federation Am. Societies Exp. Biol. 34, 5688–5696 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Challagulla, A. et al. Germline engineering of the chicken genome using CRISPR/Cas9 by in vivo transfection of PGCs. Animal Biotechnol. 1–10 (2020).

  50. 50.

    Stone, H. A. Use of Highly Inbred Chickens in Research. Report No. 1514, 1–21 (Washington, D.C., 1975).

  51. 51.

    Chang, C. M. et al. Complete association between a retroviral insertion in the tyrosinase gene and the recessive white mutation in chickens. BMC Genomics 7, 19 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Clinton, M. A rapid protocol for sexing chick embryos (Gallus g. domesticus). Anim. Genet. 25, 361–362 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the members of the Roslin chicken facility (A. Sherman, M. Hutchison, F. Brain, K. Hogan and F. Thomson) for care and breeding of the chickens, Jun Chen and Brenda Flack (Cobb-Vantress) for the SNP chip analysis, Norman Russell for photographing chicken, and Megan Davey, Sudeepta Panda and Guillermo Tellez for critiquing the paper. We thank Donald Nkrumah for the guidance to edit the FRZ feather allele, Jeff Barrow for the DOW allele,  and Appolinaire Djikeng, Bruce Whitelaw, Steve Kemp and the members of the Centre Management Group of the CTLGH for constructive comments on the project. This research was funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and with UK aid from the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (Grant Agreement OPP1127286) under the auspices of the Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health (CTLGH), established jointly by the University of Edinburgh, SRUC (Scotland’s Rural College), and the International Livestock Research Institute. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation nor the UK Government. This work was supported by the Institute Strategic Grant Funding from the BBSRC (BB/P0.13732/1 and BB/P013759/1) and Innovate UK Agri-Tech funding (BB/M011895/1).

Author information




M.B., M.W., R.H. and M.J.M. conceived the project. M.B., M.W., D.D., T.H., L.T., M.J.M. and R.H. performed the experiments. All authors analysed the results. M.B., T.H., M.J.M. and R.H. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike J. McGrew.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors M.W. and M.J.M. are inventors on patent application WO 2020074915 for the iCaspase9 transgenic chicken. The University of Edinburgh is the applicant. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Alison Van Eenennaam and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ballantyne, M., Woodcock, M., Doddamani, D. et al. Direct allele introgression into pure chicken breeds using Sire Dam Surrogate (SDS) mating. Nat Commun 12, 659 (2021).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing