Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Plant hairy roots enable high throughput identification of antimicrobials against Candidatus Liberibacter spp.


A major bottleneck in identifying therapies to control citrus greening and other devastating plant diseases caused by fastidious pathogens is our inability to culture the pathogens in defined media or axenic cultures. As such, conventional approaches for antimicrobial evaluation (genetic or chemical) rely on time-consuming, low-throughput and inherently variable whole-plant assays. Here, we report that plant hairy roots support the growth of fastidious pathogens like Candidatus Liberibacter spp., the presumptive causal agents of citrus greening, potato zebra chip and tomato vein greening diseases. Importantly, we leverage the microbial hairy roots for rapid, reproducible efficacy screening of multiple therapies. We identify six antimicrobial peptides, two plant immune regulators and eight chemicals which inhibit Candidatus Liberibacter spp. in plant tissues. The antimicrobials, either singly or in combination, can be used as near- and long-term therapies to control citrus greening, potato zebra chip and tomato vein greening diseases.


Fastidious and obligate phytopathogens cause devastating diseases in several food and commodity crops: for example, the phloem-limited bacteria Candidatus Liberibacter spp. cause severe yield losses in the Solanaceae [potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), tomato (S. lycopersicum L.), pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)] and Rutaceae (Citrus spp.) families1. Potato zebra chip (ZC) disease, putatively caused by Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum (CLso), is transmitted by an insect vector, the potato psyllid [Bactericera cockerelli (Šulc); Hemiptera: Triozidae]2. Since its discovery in 1994, ZC has been documented in several commercial potato-growing regions of the United States, Mexico, Central America, Australia, and New Zealand, causing yield losses of up to 94%3,4. Similarly, citrus greening or huanglongbing (HLB), putatively caused by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), is the most devastating disease threatening citrus production worldwide; its insect vector is the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri Kuwayama [Hemiptera: Liviidae])5. Between 2006 and 2011, HLB caused losses of more than US$4.5 billion in the US state of Florida alone6. CLas and CLso share some commonalities, such as their unculturable nature, genomic attributes, and lifestyles as psyllid-vectored and phloem-limited bacteria7,8,9,10. These and other diseases caused by fastidious plant pathogens are major threats to global agriculture and food security.

A challenge in identifying therapies against CLas and CLso is our inability to culture or maintain them outside their plant and insect hosts. Over 99% of all microorganisms are estimated to be unculturable in the laboratory11. Attempts have been made to customize artificial growth media and culture conditions to culture such microbes, including specialized modifications to growth medium composition and growth conditions tailored to the particular microbe based on what we know about its natural growth environment (e.g., temperature, pH, incubation time, inoculum size, and CO2/O2 ratio), coculturing with other microbes, and growth in biofilms or other simulated environments11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. Although these approaches have allowed some success in mono- or cocultures as means to propagate fastidious pathogens but they have provided little contribution to downstream applications such as the screening of antimicrobials against target pathogens, and therefore are not broadly utilized. Because of the constraints that exist in culturing fastidious pathogens in defined media and evaluating potential therapies, we explored alternative strategies.

Hairy roots are neoplastic growth that forms on plant tissues after wounding and infection with the soil bacterium Rhizobium rhizogenes (previously Agrobacterium rhizogenes)22,23. R. rhizogenes introduces its root-inducing transfer DNA (Ri T-DNA), encoding the root locus (rolA, rolB, rolC, and rolD) genes, into the plant genome. Expression of rol genes in planta modulates auxin homeostasis and induce hairy root initiation and proliferation in vitro; thus, hairy root cultures do not require the addition of phytohormones. Hairy roots are anatomically and metabolically similar to normal roots, and possess intact xylem and phloem vasculature connected to the source explant24,25,26. They constitute a valuable tool in plant functional biology, biotechnology, metabolic engineering, molecular pharming, and studies of root–rhizosphere interactions26,27,28,29. Classical microbiological techniques developed early in the 19th century, cultured animal and mammalian viruses in host cells, tissues, and embryonated eggs30,31,32,33,34,35,36. In a similar manner, we hypothesized that plant hairy roots could be suitable for propagating fastidious pathogens.

In this work, we show that hairy roots support the accumulation of fastidious plant bacteria, Candidatus Liberibacter spp. Furthermore, using the microbial hairy roots, we conduct antimicrobial screening leading to the discovery of multiple genetic and chemical therapies that effectively suppress Candidatus Liberibacter spp. in plant tissues.


Hairy roots support propagation of fastidious pathogens

Since Candidatus Liberibacter spp. (CLso and CLas) are phloem-limited pathogens, we tested whether plant hairy roots, which possess intact vasculature24,25,26, could sustain their growth. Hairy roots are anatomically and metabolically similar to normal roots and can be induced in a variety of plants using R. rhizogenes24,25,26. To test our hypothesis, we generated ex vivo and in planta aerial hairy roots from CLso- and CLas-infected potato, tomato and citrus explant tissues (Fig. 1a, b and Supplementary Fig. 1). We used R. rhizogenes harboring a binary T-DNA vector with a green fluorescent protein (GFP) marker to induce hairy root growth. Fluorescence microscopy analysis confirmed the production and authenticity of the transgenic hairy roots, which were distinguished from the adventitious roots by their GFP signal (Fig. 1c, d). The transformation efficiency of the hairy root induction, defined by the percentage of GFP-positive hairy roots among all roots generated, was ~70–90% in potato and tomato and ~50–70% in citrus.

Fig. 1: Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum and Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in potato and citrus hairy roots.

a, b Hairy roots (indicated by arrows) from Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum (CLso)-infected potato (a) and Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas)-infected citrus explants (b). c, d Visual confirmation of GFP expression in hairy roots by fluorescence microscopy. Scale bars, 1 cm. e, f Detection of CLso and CLas in the hairy roots by PCR amplification of diagnostic markers specific to CLso (16S rDNA) and CLas (rplk04/J5 and RNR). GFP, rolB, and rolC encoded on the Ti and Ri plasmids, respectively, and co-transformed into the hairy roots, were used as additional markers for hairy root authenticity; RPL2 and GAPC2 are endogenous potato and citrus genes, respectively, used as genomic DNA controls for PCR. “L” and “HR” indicate leaf and hairy root samples, respectively. “+” indicates positive controls used for the respective PCR amplifications. g, h Temporal growth curves of CLso and CLas in the hairy roots. The Ct values of CLso and CLas in hairy root samples collected at different days in propagation are plotted, whereas the approximate genome equivalents (GE) per nanogram of root genomic DNA are indicated above the bar graph columns. Error bars represent ± standard error of mean (n = 4 and n = 3 for g and h, respectively). Uncropped raw agarose gel images used to prepare e and f are presented in Supplementary Fig. 10. Source data underlying Fig. 1g, h are provided as a Source Data file.

The genes, rolB and rolC, encoded by the Ri T-DNA of R. rhizogenes, were amplified using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and used as additional markers to confirm the transformation of the hairy roots (Fig. 1e, f). PCR amplification using diagnostic markers specific to CLso (16S rDNA)37,38 and CLas (A2/J5 and RNR)39,40 readily detected these pathogens in the infected potato and citrus hairy roots, but not in the uninfected hairy roots (Fig. 1e, f). Similar results were obtained with CLso in a second host, tomato (Supplementary Fig. 3). The identity of CLso and CLas in the hairy roots was confirmed by Sanger sequencing and Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) analysis of the respective PCR amplicons for similarity to the NCBI nucleotide sequence database (Supplementary Fig. 8). Copy number and bacterial growth curve estimation by quantitative (q) PCR analysis further showed that CLso and CLas could be maintained in the potato and citrus hairy roots for at least 28 and 120 days, respectively (Fig. 1g, h).

Next, we performed transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to visualize CLso/CLas and probe the anatomy of the hairy roots. Unlike PCR/Sanger sequencing or immuno-labeling approaches, TEM alone is not a confirmatory test to identify pathogens. Unfortunately, immuno-labeling is technically challenging to perform for CLso/CLas detection, primarily due to limitations of existing antibodies (only available for CLas) and the low-titers and highly variable nature of CLso/CLas accumulation in infected plant tissues41. Thus far, CLas immuno-labeling was primarily successful in insect-vector42. Nevertheless, our TEM analysis showed multiple rounds- and bacilliform-shaped bacteria-like cells in the infected potato and citrus hairy roots, but not in healthy hairy roots (Supplementary Fig. 9), along with notable symptoms of vascular deterioration and collapse, presumably caused by CLso/CLas43,44. The morphology and the vascular degeneration phenotypes were reminiscent of those reported for CLas-infected citrus43,44. Furthermore, the lack of other microbes in healthy tissues suggests that the normal microbiome is well-below the detection limits of TEM hence the bacteria-like cells observed in the infected tissues are associated with CLso/CLas infection. Combined with the Sanger-sequencing confirmatory analysis, our results sufficiently demonstrate the presence of CLso/CLas in the hairy roots and suggest that the CLso/CLas can be maintained in plant hairy roots like normal infected plant roots.

Genetic evaluation using microbial hairy roots

Hairy roots are functional plant tissues that mimic the pathogen’s native host root environment. Hence, we leveraged them to conduct functional genetic screening to identify therapeutics that can inhibit Candidatus Liberibacter spp. Because CLas and CLso are closely related to each other7,8,9,10, we focused mainly on CLso-hairy potato roots for functional genetic screening due to the faster growth of potato hairy roots compared to citrus hairy roots. First, we evaluated whether gain-of-function genetic studies could be performed using the microbial hairy root system. Nonexpresser of pathogenesis-related gene 1 (NPR1) from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtNPR1 and AT1G64280)45 is a well-known broad-spectrum immune modulator that is effective against diverse pathogens. NPR1 is a receptor of the defense hormone salicylic acid (SA) and functions as a transcriptional activator of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes in plant defense and systemic acquired resistance (SAR) responses. We set out to evaluate whether any NPR1 ortholog(s) in Solanaceae could confer tolerance to Candidatus Liberibacter spp. By phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2) with AtNPR1 as a reference, we identified an orthologous gene from tomato (SlNPR1) and cloned the coding sequences into a binary vector containing a GFP reporter gene (Fig. 2a). Then we transformed each NPR1 construct and an empty vector control containing only GFP into unchallenged (healthy) or CLso-infected (CLso) explant tissue for hairy root induction using R. rhizogenes (Fig. 2b)46,47,48,49. Finally, we performed molecular diagnostics on three biological replicates of each type of hairy roots, 30 days after transformation, to confirm the presence of GFP and NPR1 expression in the respective hairy roots (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 3), followed by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based estimation of the CLso titers (Fig. 2d). The heterologous expression of SlNPR1 significantly (p ≤ 0.01) decreased CLso titers (>90%) in the hairy roots compared to the hairy roots transformed with the empty vector (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2: Screening and identification of antimicrobial genes that confer tolerance to Candidatus Liberibacter spp.

a Schematic of a typical transgene overexpression construct with a gene and a GFP marker cassette (included to serve as a visual marker for construct integration in the hairy roots). b Representative images of healthy and CLso-potato hairy roots at 30 days post transformation (i.e., 30 dpt) with control (GFP alone) or with putative disease-resistance genes from Arabidopsis (AtNPR1) and tomato (SlNPR1). c Visualization of the hairy roots under a fluorescence microscope. Scale bars, 1 cm. d Quantification of relative CLso titers in transformed hairy roots at 30 dpt, compared to control (GFP alone). Error bars represent ± standard error of mean (n = 3). p Values were calculated by two-sample t test (one-tailed). The experiment was independently repeated two times, and all attempts of replication were successful. e Relative expression of PR1-like and PR3-like and WRKY6-like genes in AtNPR1- and SlNPR1-expressing hairy roots. Error bars represent ± standard error of mean (n = 3). p Values were calculated by two-sample t test (one-tailed) relative to respective control samples. f Quantification of salicylic acid (SA) in the transformed hairy roots showed lower SA accumulation in AtNPR1 and SlNPR1 overexpressors. Error bars represent ± standard error of mean (n = 4). p Values were calculated by two-sample t test (one-tailed). g Evaluation of eight putative antimicrobial peptides in CLso-potato and CLas-citrus hairy roots. Relative CLso and CLas titers were calculated from five biological replicates. Error bars represent ± standard error of mean (n = 5). p Values were calculated by two-sample t test (one-tailed) relative to infected controls. The experiment was independently repeated two times, and all attempts of replication were successful. Source data underlying Fig. 2d–f are provided as a Source Data file.

To determine the mechanism whereby NPR1 suppressed Candidatus Liberibacter spp. in potato, we monitored the changes in the downstream expression of two PR genes (PR-1 like and PR-3 like). Expression of these PR genes was significantly higher in both SlNPR1- and AtNPR1-expressing hairy roots under healthy conditions than in empty-vector-transformed controls (Fig. 2e). These expression levels were further greatly amplified upon CLso infection in both SlNPR1- and AtNPR1-expressing hairy roots when compared to vector-alone control (Fig. 2e). Expression of a WRKY transcription factor (WRKY6-like) involved in NPR1-mediated PR gene activation50,51 was also strongly induced in SlNPR1- and AtNPRI-expressing hairy roots (Fig. 2e). Compared to healthy hairy roots, CLso-infected hairy roots had significantly higher levels of free SA (Fig. 2f), as determined by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). However, despite the activation of downstream defense-related genes, SA levels were significantly lower in SlNPR1- and AtNPR1-expressing hairy roots than in empty vector controls, under both healthy and CLso-infected conditions (Fig. 2f).

In addition to evaluating plant immune modulators, we tested the efficacy of eight putative broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) isolated from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) that show some inhibitory activity against other Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria52,53,54. Briefly, we cloned the coding sequences of each peptide into the binary vectors and transformed them into the CLso-potato and CLas-citrus explant tissues for hairy root induction and analyzed them in a manner similar to NPR1 evaluation (Fig. 2b–d). The results of the antimicrobial assays showed that five of the eight AMPs (denoted AMP1–AMP5) significantly (p ≤ 0.05 or 0.01) reduced CLso and CLas titers (~70–98%) in the hairy roots compared to the controls transformed with the empty vector containing GFP alone (Fig. 2g). Conversely, AMP6 and AMP8 appear to slightly increase CLso and CLas titers, possibly by inhibiting other unknown competitive microbes present in the hairy roots.

Genome editing using microbial hairy roots

Next, we evaluated whether the microbial hairy root system could be used to perform genome-editing studies. For proof-of-concept, we evaluated the editing of a stably integrated GFP gene in a genetically engineered potato. To test this hypothesis, we generated constructs containing Cas9 alone (control) or Cas9–sgGFP. We then used these to transform healthy or CLso-containing explant tissues for hairy root induction, as described above (Fig. 3a, b). Fluorescence microscopy imaging of the transformed hairy roots showed a clear loss of GFP fluorescence (from the transgene) (Fig. 3c, d) in hairy roots transformed with Cas9–sgGFP, but not in Cas9 only (control). Amplicon sequencing of the target site confirmed successful editing had occurred in Cas9–sgGFP hairy roots, but not in Cas9 only roots. Frequencies of indels detected were ~86 and 100% in the healthy and CLso hairy roots, respectively (Fig. 3c–f). In addition, we sought to edit an endogenous gene, NPR3, in potato. Unlike NPR1, its homologs NPR3 and NPR4 function antagonistically to suppress plant defense in Arabidopsis, and their levels and activities are tightly regulated via complex biochemical interactions in order to maintain defense homeostasis55,56,57. Therefore, it seemed possible that reducing endogenous NPR3 activity in Solanaceae could impart plant tolerance for CLso. To test this hypothesis, we identified the potato ortholog of AtNPR3 (StNPR3) and generated constructs containing Cas9 alone (control) or Cas9–sgNPR3. We then used these to transform healthy or CLso-containing explant tissues for hairy root induction, as described above (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Amplicon sequencing of the target site confirmed that successful editing had occurred in the Cas9–sgNPR3 hairy roots, but not the Cas9 control hairy roots (Supplementary Fig. 4c), albeit at a lower rate of ~40%, which was not unexpected given the heterozygous autotetraploid nature of potato (2n = 4x = 48), which means there are four copies of each endogenous gene. Nevertheless, when we estimated the CLso levels of three biological replicates at 30 days post transformation using qPCR, we found that the Cas9–sgNPR3 hairy roots had significantly (p ≤ 0.01) lower CLso titers (>90%) than the control hairy roots (Supplementary Fig. 4d). The suppression of CLso titers was strongly associated with induced expression of NPR1 and several defense marker genes (WRKY6-like, PR-1 like, and PR-3 like) in the Cas9–sgNPR3-edited hairy roots (Supplementary Fig. 4e). Similar activation of plant defenses was observed in Theobroma cacao wherein CRISPR editing of ~27% alleles of NPR3 was sufficient to enhance resistance to Phytophthora tropicalis58. The observed resistance even when partial NPR3 alleles are removed could be due to the systemic nature of the SAR response, whereby a defense signal originated from the NPR3-edited cells is perpetuated to non-edited cells, that ultimately limits the pathogen accumulation. Alternatively, it is possible that native NPR3 activity is affected by gene dosage or haploinsufficiency59,60,61 and/or dominant-negatively inhibited by the truncated/aberrant NPR3 proteins resulting from the edited NPR3 alleles62. Regardless of the exact mechanisms of the NPR3 action, these results offer proof-of-concept for conducting genome-editing experiments using the microbial hairy root system and uncover NPR3 as a potential target for CRISPR editing to gain resistance to Candidatus Liberibacter spp.

Fig. 3: Evaluation of genome editing in microbial hairy roots.

a Typical CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing construct. The underlined sequence is the target DNA site used in the sgRNA. bd Transformation of Cas9 alone (control) and Cas9–sgGFP targeting stably expressed GFP transgene in healthy and Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum (CLso) hairy roots. The loss of GFP fluorescence in Cas9–sgGFP, but not in Cas9 alone, indicates successful editing of the GFP transgene. Scale bars, 1 cm. The experiment was independently repeated two times, and all attempts of replication were successful. e, f Amplicon sequencing confirmed gene editing in the target site (GFP), as indicated by presence of indels in the Cas9–sgGFP hairy roots, but not in Cas9-alone hairy roots. Frequencies of indels detected were ~86 and 100% in the healthy and CLso hairy roots, respectively. Uncropped raw agarose gel images used to prepare Supplementary Fig. 3b are presented in Supplementary Fig. 11.

High throughput in vitro therapeutic screening

The use of trans/cis-genic-based or genome-editing strategies is a stable, long-term solution to combat diseases; however, it is often a precarious one, owing to the tremendous regulatory burden associated with agricultural use of genetically modified crops, even those produced by CRISPR/Cas. Thus, we also sought to find short- to intermediate-term solutions, and we therefore conducted high-throughput screening of small-molecule inhibitors among a diverse collection of bioactive compounds approved for use in United States and other countries (Microsource Discovery Systems, Inc.)63,64. For this, we developed an in vitro multi-well plate assay using the microbial hairy roots, which is scalable from 12- to 48- to 96-well layout. Briefly, we generated microbial hairy roots with CLso and CLas, transferred them to a multi-well plate containing growth medium to maintain the hairy roots, and then added small molecules of interest to the assay plates and incubated the hairy roots for 72 h (Fig. 4a). We performed a primary screening with ~220 compounds in CLso hairy roots, using two biological replicates per compound (10 µM) along with untreated or solvent-alone controls (DMSO, 0.1% v/v). By molecular diagnostics, we identified nine molecules that inhibited CLso titers by >50–70% when compared to the untreated controls (Supplementary Dataset 1). We retested these nine molecules using five biological replicates, alongside a reference antibiotic, tetracycline (TC, 250 ppm), that was previously reported to moderately inhibit CLas in planta65. We also screened the efficacy of the nine compounds (25 µM) and tetracycline (TC, 500 ppm) in CLas hairy roots. Seven out of the nine test compounds, as well as tetracycline, consistently showed statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05 or 0.01) inhibition of CLso (Fig. 4b). Four compounds showed statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05 or 0.01) inhibition of CLas, on par with tetracycline (Fig. 4c). Three compounds inhibited both CLso and CLas (#3, #8 and #9) (Fig. 4b, c). In general, the active compounds appear to possess diverse structures and bioactive profiles (Fig. 4d–m): three of them were indexed as antibacterial, whereas others were classified as antifungal, antiprotozoal, hemostatic, antihistaminic, antidiabetic, and mydriactic drugs targeting various biological processes. Note that since the retested nine molecules were originally prescreened in CLso-potato hairy roots (Supplementary Data 1), it is very likely that further re-screening of the entire library using CLas-citrus hairy roots would identify additional hits.

Fig. 4: High-throughput screening and identification of small molecules that confer tolerance to Candidatus Liberibacter spp.

ac Multi-well microbial hairy root culture plates were used to conduct high-throughput screening of ~220 compounds (Supplementary Dataset 1). The efficacy data for nine selected hit compounds were re-assayed at 10 and 25 µM, respectively, in a, b CLso and a, c CLas hairy roots. Untreated (UT) and tetracycline (TC)-treated hairy roots (at 250 and 500 ppm, respectively, for the CLso and CLas assays) were used as positive and negative controls. The bacterial titers were estimated by qPCR after 72 h of treatment with each compound and plotted relative to those of untreated samples (set to 100%). Error bars represent ± standard error of mean (n = 5). p Values were calculated by two-sample t test (one-tailed) relative to untreated samples. dm Chemical structures of d tetracycline and the nine hits: e aminocaproic acid (#1), f carbinoxamine maleate (#2), g chloroxylenol (#3), h chlorpropamide (#4), i chlortetracycline (#5), j cinoxacin (#6), k cortisone acetate (#7), l duartin (#8), and m cyclopentolate hydrochloride (#9). The structures of the different chemical compounds were retrieved from the ChemSpider database ( (last accessed on 15 October 2020). Source data underlying Fig. 4b, c are provided as a Source Data file.

Besides screening small molecules, we also tested whether the in vitro hairy root bioassay setup could be used for evaluating small peptides (~50 aa). For this, we tested the efficacy of the two AMPs (AMP2 and AMP5; Fig. 2g) by direct vacuum infiltration of the recombinant peptides (5 and 10 µg/ml) into the CLas-citrus microbial hairy roots, in a manner similar to the small molecules (Fig. 4a). Molecular diagnostics performed after 72 h of treatment revealed that both AMPs showed statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05 or 0.01) dose-dependent inhibition of CLas (Supplementary Fig. 5) compared to untreated controls.

Delivery of small molecules into the plant phloem, especially in hardy perennial citrus trees, is a major challenge. The most practical and common approach is foliar spraying; however, this was shown to be relatively ineffective in citrus as a means to deliver bactericides such as oxytetracycline to inhibit CLas65. Multiple research groups are evaluating alternative approaches, such as trunk injection and/or nanoparticle-based systems65,66. Potato plants are relatively easier to handle and are amenable to foliar spraying techniques. Thus, to determine the in planta efficacy of the three molecules that showed good inhibitory activity against both CLso and CLas (#3, #8, and #9) in the hairy root assays (Fig. 4), we used the CLso-potato plant system. First, we repeated efficacy assays in CLso-potato microbial hairy roots, testing a broader range of concentrations (0, 5, 10, 25, and 50 µM) (Supplementary Fig. 6) to establish a general dose-response curve. Based on these results, 10 and 25 µM concentrations were chosen for in planta foliar spraying experiments. Plants were sprayed with each compound twice a week, alongside untreated plants and tetracycline (250 ppm)-treated plants as negative and positive controls, respectively. Disease progression was monitored for 28 days post infection (dpi), by which time untreated plants showed the typical foliar disease symptoms such as chlorosis, necrosis, leaf curling and wilting, and were quite close to dying (Fig. 5a). In contrast, potatoes sprayed with any of the three test molecules showed a lower level of disease symptoms that was also dose-dependent, i.e., plants sprayed with 25 µM showed the least symptoms, followed by those sprayed with 10 µM and untreated plants, and the level of protection was on par with that from tetracycline treatment (Fig. 5a). The attenuated symptoms also correlated with lowered CLso titers in the respective treatment groups compared to untreated controls (Fig. 5b). Together, these experiments demonstrate that the identified compounds can inhibit Candidatus Liberibacter spp. in planta, and the efficacy results conform with the results of the hairy root bioassays.

Fig. 5: In planta application of small molecules confer tolerance to Candidatus Liberibacter spp. in potatoes.

a Visual symptoms of plants at 28 days post infection (dpi). Tetracycline (TC, 250 ppm) and three selected small molecules (#3, #8, and #9; see Fig. 4) were sprayed on the plants at two concentrations (10 and 25 µM) as indicated. Disease symptoms of chlorosis, necrosis, leaf curling, and wilting were monitored. b CLso titers were determined by qPCR at 28 dpi. All titers are plotted relative to those of untreated samples, which were set to 100%. Error bars represent ± standard error of mean (n = 4). p Values were calculated by two-sample t test (one-tailed) relative to untreated samples. Source data underlying Fig. 5b are provided as a Source Data file.


A recent consensus study by the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) on the status of the citrus greening research and development concluded that there is no single effective therapy to fight the disease67. This holds not only for citrus greening but also for other insect-vectored diseases caused by Candidatus Liberibacter spp.1. The NAS report also suggested deploying a combination of therapies and management practices to combat the disease54,67,68,69,70. However, a major challenge in finding therapies has been the unculturable nature of Candidatus Liberibacter spp., which makes conventional gene- or chemical-therapy evaluation laborious and time-consuming. For instance, evaluating the efficacy of an AMP using either stable transformation or transient viral vectors (e.g., tobacco rattle virus and citrus tristeza virus) followed by disease challenges in mature plants could take from 6 months to several years71,72,73. Similarly, screening of small-molecule inhibitors of active ingredients by foliar spraying, by stem injection, or by grafting using mature plants, is inherently variable due to the challenges associated with delivering the inhibitors to the bacteria that reside unevenly within the plant vasculature65. Furthermore, the latter approaches are laborious and time-consuming, and hence not suitable for high-throughput studies65,68,69. Researchers have also resorted to using distantly related microbes as surrogates74,75,76,77. However, these results may or may not be reliable or extrapolatable to the target pathogen, owing to differences in pathosystems and virulence mechanisms (or lack thereof).

In a manner similar to the classical culture strategies for mammalian viruses in host cells, tissues, and embryonated eggs30,31,32,33,34,35,36, our experiments demonstrate that plant hairy roots can be used for ex vivo propagation of fastidious pathogens like Candidatus Liberibacter spp. We hypothesize similar strategies using insect-vector cell lines could be used for propagating Candidatus Liberibacter spp. Although this is not an axenic culture system, the microbial hairy root system is highly versatile and enables faster genetic and chemical therapeutic screening, which led to the identification of multiple potential short- and long-term therapies to control CLso and CLas. As short-term therapies, we identified eight bioactive compounds that are quite diverse in their chemical structures and modes of action (Fig. 4, Supplementary Dataset 1). Toward long-term solutions, we identified six broad-spectrum AMPs and one positive and one negative plant defense regulator (SlNPR1 and StNPR3, respectively), that inhibit Candidatus Liberibacter spp. in plant tissues. All these, either individually or in combinations, could be further deployed in the host plants to develop robust resistance against these phytopathogens.

We also show that the microbial hairy root system can be used to obtain mechanistic insights into gene function. Characterization of SlNPR1 and AtNPR1 function in potato hairy roots revealed that NPR1 confers tolerance to CLso by activating PR gene expression, consistent with its known role as a transcriptional co-activator in other plant–microbe interactions. Interestingly, SlNPR1 and AtNPR1-expressing hairy roots accumulate SA to a lesser degree than empty vector controls. There are multiple scenarios that could explain this. First, it is possible that SA accumulation in NPR1 overexpressors is directly (positively) correlated to the levels of CLso. Second, SA-mediated signaling could be far more potent in the NPR1 overexpressors than in the controls, and thus less SA might be needed to mediate the defense responses. The second hypothesis posits that in empty vector controls, NPR1 concentration/activity is less than optimal for triggering SA-mediated defenses, and so more SA is produced to compensate for the relatively lower amounts of NPR1. Third, a negative feedback loop in the NPR1 overexpressors could suppress SA levels to maintain defense homeostasis. Although we did not find any previous reports in which SA levels in NPR1-overexpressing plants were determined, studies of Arabidopsis npr1 mutants and other SA biosynthesis mutants indicate that NPR1 participates in negative feedback regulation of SA biosynthesis78,79,80,81,82. Recently, Wang et al.57 also showed no concomitant increase in the levels of SA despite activation of two SA-related genes (PR1 and PAL1) in maize roots colonized by Trichoderma83. Thus, the results here support a model wherein NPR1 mediates PR gene activation to inhibit CLso in potato and negatively regulates SA accumulation to prevent toxic build-up and/or to maintain defense homeostasis78,79,80,81,82,83.

A salient feature of the microbial hairy root system is that the efficacy assays are conducted in living (root) tissues that not only mimic the native environment of the pathogen but also encompass features that underpin native plant–microbe interactions, aspects that cannot be replicated in axenic culturing systems. A growing number of studies have indicated the pivotal roles of roots, root–rhizosphere interactions and root–microbiome composition in plant health and disease, including citrus health and HLB progression84,85,86,87,88,89,90. For instance, in the majority of presymptomatic citrus trees, roots appear to be the first site of CLas detection, preceding leaves86. CLas also is more abundant and more consistently detectable, in roots than in shoots, making root a preferred source tissue in which to perform disease diagnostics tests. Furthermore, roots act as the reservoir for CLas between periods of foliar flushing86 and to endure the seasonal fluctuations of high temperatures in summer months84. Relatively few groups have studied CLso root infections, but the levels and distribution of CLso are greater in roots than shoots, much as for CLas91. Given the significance of roots to CLas and CLso pathology, we posit that the hairy-root-based bioassays described here are more biologically relevant than surrogate pathogen and/or axenic culture systems74,75,76. This is also underscored by reproducible screening results with Arabidopsis NPR1, and a broad-spectrum bactericide (tetracycline) (Figs. 2 and 4), which inhibited Candidatus Liberibacter spp. in the microbial hairy root bioassays, much as they did in planta (Fig. 5)65,73. Moreover, hairy root bioassays circumvent challenges associated with inefficient delivery of compounds into the phloem of whole plants that can result in inconclusive results65. For all of these reasons, this approach is very well suited both for primary screening of potential antimicrobial therapies and for narrowing down potential hits.

The hairy-root propagation and antimicrobial screening approaches are relatively straightforward and do not require specialized equipment or apparatus11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. The only prerequisite is that the host plant or variety should be amenable to R. rhizogenes-mediated hairy root transformation92. Depending on the host plant, the microbial hairy roots can be maintained for ~6 weeks (e.g., CLso-potato hairy roots) or >12 months (e.g., CLas-citrus hairy roots) (Fig. 1g, h). In our experience, this is mainly determined by the lifestyle of the host plant (annual vs. perennial), as well as its degree of tolerance for the pathogen. The latter is relevant because the hairy roots are living tissue matrices, and they eventually succumb to pathogen pressure and show vascular degeneration symptoms (Supplementary Fig. 9) in a manner similar to the host plant roots43,44. Nevertheless, the hairy root propagation timeframes we have demonstrated are more than sufficient to accomplish various antimicrobial screening experiments.

Another advantage of using the microbial hairy root system is that the screening can be accomplished four to six times faster than with conventional approaches68,69,71,72. For instance, small molecules or peptides can be screened using in vitro hairy root assays in ~72 h (Fig. 4), vs. several weeks to months when using conventional in planta approaches (Fig. 5). For evaluating larger proteins, in size range of NPR1, or those forming biochemical complexes as in CRISPR–Cas9, we suggest using the genetic-based hairy root transformation approach (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 4). Caution must also be exercised to ensure that the small peptides being tested are appropriately folded and/or have the necessary post-translational modifications when produced via synthetic or recombinant techniques. Nevertheless, evaluation of genes/CRISPR targets using genetic constructs still can be accomplished in ~30 days in potatoes and ~90–120 days in citrus after transformation vs. several months to years, respectively, for conventional in planta techniques, thus facilitating faster screening and discovery of therapies.

In conclusion, microbial hairy roots offer a versatile and robust system for the discovery of multiple therapies effective against fastidious pathogens. We suggest that small-molecule inhibitors, AMPs, and genes discovered in this study, either individually or in combination, can be further utilized in planta to control potato ZC and citrus greening diseases.


Plant and insect maintenance and disease challenges

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L. var. Atlantic) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. var. Lance) plants were propagated in a professional growth mix (Metro-Mix 360, Sun Gro Horticulture, MA) and maintained in a growth chamber at 21–22 °C, with a 14-h/10-h light/dark photoperiod and 50% relative humidity. Bactericera cockerelli (Šulc) psyllid colonies that were either CLso positive (haplotype B, the most virulent and prevalent haplotype) or CLso negative were collected in Texas, USA38, and maintained in nylon mesh cages (Bugdorm, Taiwan) in the laboratory. The presence and haplotype of CLso in the psyllid colonies were periodically confirmed using PCR, with primers specific to the single sequence repeat (SSR) loci of CLso (SSR-F and SSR-R; Supplementary Table 1)93. To generate CLso-infected plants, 1-month-old potato and tomato plants were challenged with ~20 psyllids per plant harboring CLso. The psyllids were released onto the plants in an enclosed organza bag tied to a lower branch with fully expanded leaves and were allowed to feed for 1 week. Subsequently, the bags and psyllids were removed from the plant, and the unchallenged upper branches were sampled periodically using PCR, as described below, to confirm the systemic spread of CLso in the plants, which typically could be detected at around 14 days post challenge.

Microbial hairy root production and molecular diagnostics

Both ex vivo and in planta approaches were evaluated to generate potato and tomato hairy roots using CLso-infected plants as an inoculum. In the ex vivo approach, branches were excised from either healthy or CLso-infected plants 21 days post challenge and then dipped into a fresh culture of R. rhizogenes (American Type Culture Collection strain 15834 or 43056; OD600 = 0.5)47,48,49 followed by vacuum infiltration for ~30 min at 30 psi. All explants were subsequently transferred to the inert vermiculite matrix in a humidity dome tray with frequent misting to maintain high humidity. In the in planta approach, R. rhizogenes (OD600 = 0.5) were directly inoculated into the stems of live plants using a syringe, after which the stems were wrapped with foil to maintain humidity and placed in a growth chamber. To generate the CLas-citrus hairy roots, CLas-positive branches, confirmed using PCR, were collected from either HLB-graft-infected or naturally infected citrus trees (Rio Red grapefruit [C. × aurantium L. var. racemosa (Risso & Poit.)] or sour orange [C. × aurantium L.]) maintained in the research plots of Texas A&M University Kingsville Citrus Center, Weslaco, TX, USA (26°10′00.1″N 97°57′27.7″W). Alternatively, uninfected citrus explants from glasshouse-grown trees could be used for hairy root induction, followed by exposure to the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri) to transmit CLas, although it takes longer to passage CLas into hairy roots by the later approach. In either approach, for hairy root induction citrus explants were inoculated with R. rhizogenes46,47,48,49. Briefly, budwood tissues (~0.5 cm diameter, ~5 cm length) with a single node were excised, and the cut ends were immersed in a solution of R. rhizogenes (OD600 = 0.5), followed by vacuum infiltration for ~30 min at ~30 psi. All explants were subsequently transferred to vermiculite media in a humidity dome tray. The explants were frequently misted with water to maintain high humidity, which is critical for explant viability and hairy root recovery.

Typical hairy root formation in potato and citrus begins approximately 14 and 30 days after transformation, respectively. Upon emergence the authenticity of hairy roots was confirmed using GFP visualization with fluorescence microscopy (Olympus Corporation, Japan). The hairy root transformation efficiency was calculated using the following formula: number of GFP-positive roots/total number of roots × 100. The transformation of the hairy roots was further confirmed using PCR amplification of either the GFP or rolB/rolC genes encoded on the binary and Ri T-DNA plasmids, respectively, which were transformed into the hairy roots. The Solanaceae RPL2 and citrus GAPC2 endogenous genes were used as the PCR controls. The presence of CLso in the infected hairy roots were assessed by amplification of CLso 16s rDNA using specific primers (OA2-F/OI2c-R and Lso-F/HLB-R)37,38, whereas CLas was estimated using specific markers for genes encoding ribosomal protein (rplA, A2-F/J5-R) and ribonucleotide reductase β-subunit gene (nrdB, RNR-F/RNR-R)39,40. Sanger sequencing and BLAST analysis further confirmed the identity of CLso and CLas PCR amplicons (Supplementary Fig. 8). The temporal patterns of CLso and CLas accumulation in the hairy roots were assessed by determining the titers at various days in propagation. CLso samples were collected at 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days, whereas CLas samples were collected at 0, 30, 90, 120, and 180 days (Fig. 1g, h). To estimate the copy number, standard curves for CLso and CLas were generated and regression equation was used to determine the genome equivalents (GEs), as described below.

Estimation of CLso and CLas copy number using standard curves

Two separate standard curves were established to estimate the copy number and GE of CLso and CLas present in the potato and citrus hairy roots, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 7). Briefly, a 76-bp amplicon corresponding to the 16S rDNA of CLso37 and an 81-bp amplicon corresponding to the nrdB gene of CLas40 were synthesized and cloned into the pUC57 vector (GenScript, NJ, USA)37. This plasmid was used as a template to generate the standard curves. Copy number of these targets was determined from the size of the amplified fragment (76 bp for CLso and 81 bp for CLas) and the size of the vector in which the fragment was cloned (2716 + 76 = 2792 bp for CLso and 2716 + 81 = 2797 bp for CLas). The molar mass of the plasmid was estimated in Daltons using Eq. 1

$${\mathrm{g}}/{\mathrm{mol}} = \left( {{\mathrm{bp}}\,{\mathrm{size}}\,{\mathrm{of}}\,{\mathrm{plasmid}} + {\mathrm{insert}}} \right) \times (330\,{\mathrm{Da}} \times 2\,{\mathrm{nucleotides}}/{\mathrm{bp}}).$$

The weight of a single copy of the plasmid was estimated using Eq. 2

$${\mathrm{g}}/{\mathrm{molecule}} = {\mathrm{Weight}}\,{\mathrm{in}}\,{\mathrm{Daltons}}\left( {{\mathrm{g}}/{\mathrm{mol}}} \right)/6.02 \times 10^{23}.$$

Finally, the number of the molecules in a qPCR reaction was determined using the formula: molecules/μL = concentration of plasmid (g/μL)/weight of the one molecule (g/molecule). For the standard curve determination, the plasmid was diluted 10-fold to obtain ~8.17 × 109 to 8.17 × 100 copies and was spiked into 50 ng of DNA extracted from healthy hairy roots for further qPCR analysis. The qPCR analysis was performed as described in the material and methods. The log10 value of the copy number was plotted against the threshold cycle (Ct) to establish a standard curve (Supplementary Fig. 7). The standard curve regression equations 3 and 4

$$y = - 3.7698x + 39.428,$$
$$y = - 3.3197x + 34.822,$$

were used to calculate CLso and CLas copy numbers, respectively. Since three copies of the 16S rRNA gene37 and five copies of nrdB gene40 were reported per bacterial genome, to determine the final GE in a test sample, the copy number was divided by total number of copies in each bacterium. The copy number shown in Fig. 1g, h are reported as number of bacterial cells present per 1 ng of hairy root extracted DNA37.

Transmission electron microscopy

Healthy and CLso/CLas-infected hairy roots were surface sterilized with 2% bleach, followed by five washes with sterile distilled water. Hairy-root tips (~3 cm) were excised and fixed with 3% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M Sorenson phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for overnight at 4 °C. Fixed roots were washed in Sorenson phosphate buffer, and post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide (w/v) in the same buffer for 4 h at room temperature94. All samples were washed in Sorenson phosphate buffer and dehydrated in 10% acetone (v/v), followed by infiltration and embedding in Spurr’s resin over 3 days. Embedded roots were sectioned (100 nm) and mounted on a formvar-coated copper grids (200 mesh), and stained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate (w/v) and Reynolds lead citrate. Samples were examined under a FEI Morgagni 268 transmission electron microscope (FEI, Netherlands).

SA quantification

One hundred milligrams of hairy root tissue was mixed with 500 μL phytohormone extraction buffer (1-propanol/water/HCl [2:1:0.002 vol/vol/vol]) containing 500 nM of the internal standard, d6-SA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Zirconia beads were added to the samples, and they were homogenized at 6000 rpm for 1 min at room temperature in a Precellys 24 homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). The samples were then agitated for 30 min at 4 °C under darkness. Afterwards, 500 μL dichloromethane was added to each sample and the samples were again agitated for 30 min at 4 °C in darkness before being centrifuged at 17,000g for 5 min. The lower organic layer of each sample was transferred to a glass vial for evaporation under nitrogen gas. Samples were resuspended in 150 μL methanol, transferred to 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes and stored in a −20 °C freezer overnight. The samples were then centrifuged at 17,000g for 2 min to pellet any debris, and then 90 µL of the supernatant of each sample was transferred into an autosampler vial for LC–MS/MS analysis. An Ascentis Express C-18 Column (3 cm × 2.1 mm, 2.7 µm) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) connected to an API 3200 LC–MS/MS (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) using electrospray ionization with multiple reaction monitoring was used to detect SA [m/z = 140.8/96.9 (Q1/Q3)] and d6-SA [m/z = 137/92.9 (Q1/Q3)]. The injection volume was 10 μL, and the 500 μL min−1 mobile phase consisted of Solution A (0.2% acetic acid in water) and Solution B (0.2% acetic acid in acetonitrile) with a gradient consisting of (time—%B): 0.5–10%, 1.0–20%, 21.0–70%, 24.6–100%, 24.8–10%, 29–stop. SA was quantified by comparison against the isotopically labeled internal standard, d6-SA (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Antimicrobial efficacy testing using microbial hairy roots

The phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis, potato, and tomato NPR genes was performed using the Maximum Likelihood statistical method and Jones–Taylor–Thornton substitution model using MEGAX95. For the transformation of the antimicrobial genes and CRISPR constructs into the CLso-potato or CLas-citrus hairy roots, binary vectors containing either AtNPR1-, SlNPR1-, or StNPR3-CRISPR–Cas9 constructs or the appropriate negative controls (empty vector/GFP alone) were transformed into R. rhizogenes and used for the induction of hairy roots using pre-infected explant source material, as described above. About 30 days (for CLso-potato) and 90 days (CLas-citrus) after the transformation, the hairy roots were visually screened for GFP under a fluorescence dissection microscope. Three independent biological replicates, comprising randomly selected GFP-positive hairy roots, were collected from the controls and treatments, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use for molecular diagnostics.

High-throughput screening of small molecules was performed using ~220 compounds from the Spectrum bioactives collection (Microsource Discovery Systems, Inc., CT, USA)63,64. Primary screening was performed with two biological replicates of each compound (10 µM in aqueous DMSO, 0.1% v/v), along with untreated and solvent-alone negative controls (DMSO, 0.1% v/v) against CLso. Briefly, ~200 mg of the CLso-containing hairy roots were surface sterilized with 2% bleach and then washed five times with sterile distilled water. The hairy roots were transferred into multi-well plates containing Gamborg’s B-5 medium with 1% sucrose. The compounds were then added to the plate, and the medium was vacuum infiltrated at ~20 psi to facilitate the penetration of the molecules into the hairy root matrices. The hairy roots were incubated on a 3D platform rotator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 60 rpm in the dark at 21 °C for 72 h. The hairy root tissues were sampled after 72 h, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C in preparation for further processing. The most effective compounds identified in the primary screening were retested at both at 10 and 25 µM, using five biological replicates each, against both CLso and CLas, along with tetracycline as a positive control. The structures of the different chemical compounds were retrieved from the ChemSpider database ( (last accessed on 15 October 2020). Direct protein infiltration assays were performed in the same manner as for small molecules, but with purified recombinant peptides (Shifa Biomedical Corp., PA, USA) corresponding to AMP2 and AMP5.

In planta efficacy trials

Three-week-old potato (var. Atlantic) plants were challenged with CLso-containing psyllids. Briefly, five psyllids carrying CLso were restricted to the lowest branch of each plant and contained using an organza drawstring bag tied around the branch. After 1 week, the bags containing psyllids were clipped off the plant to end inoculation and prevent the escape of the newly emerging psyllids and/or nymphs. All the challenged plants were treated with either 0 (untreated), 10 or 25 µM of the selected compounds and tetracycline (250 ppm) twice a week for 4 weeks. To enhance penetration into leaf tissues, all the compounds were mixed with an R-11 nonionic surfactant, which improves the activity and efficacy of the spray application by reducing surface tension and increasing penetration into the plant surface. Four biological replicate plants were included for each treatment. The visual disease symptoms on the plants were monitored weekly, and tissue samples were collected (as described above) at 28 dpi for molecular diagnostics as described below.

Plasmid design and amplicon sequencing

To obtain the full-length NPR1 coding sequences, the total RNA was extracted from 3-week-old Arabidopsis (A. thaliana; ecotype Col-0) and tomato seedlings and used for cDNA synthesis with SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Arabidopsis NPR1 (1,782-bp) (AT1G64280.1) and tomato NPR1 (1731 bp) coding sequences (Solyc07g040690.2.1) were amplified with Phusion DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) from the template cDNA using primers containing the EcoRI restriction site at the 5ʹ end of the forward primer and a BamHI site at the 3ʹ end of the reverse primer (Supplementary Table 1). The PCR products were then digested with EcoRI/BamHI and cloned into a binary vector containing the GFP reporter gene (pBIN-mGFP) under the control of a double-enhanced CaMV 35S promoter (DE35S-P) and the 35S terminator (35S-T). All the nucleotide sequences were confirmed using Sanger DNA sequencing before being transformed into R. rhizogenes to generate hairy roots.

For the CRISPR experiments, multiple single guide RNA (sgRNA) targets were designed for the GFP and NPR3 gene sequences (PGSC0003DMG401000923) using the CRISPR-P design toolset96. The sequences of the top sgRNA hits are provided in Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 4a. The respective sgRNA targets were produced as synthetic oligos (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc., IA, USA) with the appropriate overhang sequences. Each pair of oligonucleotides was annealed and phosphorylated. The pChimera vector containing the Arabidopsis U6-26 promoter97 was linearized using BbsI, and the spacer was ligated between the two BbsI sites using the annealed oligonucleotides. The customized RNA chimera was then subcloned into pBIN-HcoCas9:mGFP98 to obtain a functional Cas9 expression construct for targeted mutagenesis (Fig. 3a). The Cas9 vector carrying sgNPR3 or the sgGFP spacer sequence and Cas9 were independently transferred into R. rhizogenes for the generation of the hairy roots.

To detect indels in the transgenic hairy roots, a 500-bp target region in NPR3 or GFP was amplified using PCR with gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) and Phusion Polymerase (New England Biolabs). The PCR amplicons were cleaned using DNA PCR clean-up kits (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and sequenced using Sanger sequencing (Eton Bioscience, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The percentage of indels in the transgenic hairy roots was analyzed using the Inference of CRISPR Edits tool99.

Molecular diagnostics

To confirm that the transgene was expressed in the transformed hairy roots, total RNA was isolated from the transformed materials using the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Plus kit (Zymo Research) according to manufacturer’s instructions and then subjected to reverse transcription PCR. First-strand cDNAs were synthesized from 2.0 μg total RNA using the Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, PCR analysis was performed using a ProFLex PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to validate gene expression in the hairy roots. The tomato and potato RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN L2 (RPL2) genes (accessions Solyc10g006580.2 and PGSC0003DMG400025015, respectively) and citrus GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE C2 (GAPC2, XM_006483974.2) were used as endogenous reference genes for the normalization and estimation of the relative expression levels. The primer pairs used are listed in Supplementary Table 1 and targeted the following: the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of Tomato Etch Virus (TEV) flanking the NPR1 genes (TEV-F and TEV-R) (Fig. 2a), tomato RPL2 (RPL2-F and RPL2-R)100, potato RPL2 (StRPL2-F and StRPL2-R), and citrus GAPC2 (GAPC2-F and GAPC2-R)101.

To determine the effects of small molecules, transgenes and the CRISPR–Cas9 constructs on the CLso and CLas titers within the hairy roots, qPCR analysis was performed using DNA isolated from the various samples. DNA was isolated from the citrus hairy roots from ~200 mg of tissue homogenized using a Precellys 24 homogenizer (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA)102. The quality and quantity of DNA were determined using a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and agarose gel electrophoresis. Approximately, 50 ng total DNA was used for the qPCR analysis, which was performed on a CFX384™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories) using iTaq™ universal SYBR® Green supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The CLso 16S rDNA-specific primers (OA2-F/OI2c-R and Lso-F/HLB-R) were used to detect CLso37,38, whereas primers for the CLas genes encoding ribosomal protein (rplA, A2-F/J5-R) and ribonucleotide reductase β-subunit (nrdB, RNR-F/RNR-R) were used to detect CLas39,40 (Supplementary Table 1). A dissociation or melting curve analysis was performed to confirm the lack of nonspecific amplification and primer-dimers. For the antimicrobial treatments, the relative CLso titers were estimated using the 2−ΔΔCt method103. The CLso Ct values were normalized to RPL2 to correct for concentration differences in the DNA templates among the samples and were plotted relative to the level in the control (DMSO-treated) CLso hairy root samples, which was set to 100%. Student’s t test was used to determine statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05 or 0.01) differences among the controls and treatments.

Data analysis and statistics

All the data analysis, statistics and graphs were displayed as described in the figure legends using Microsoft Excel software (version 2009) and Python bioinfokit package (

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the Supplementary Information Files. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file. The datasets and/or plant materials generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. 1.

    Haapalainen, M. Biology and epidemics of Candidatus Liberibacter species, psyllid-transmitted plant-pathogenic bacteria. Ann. Appl. Biol. 165, 172–198 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Munyaneza, J. Zebra chip disease of potato: biology, epidemiology, and management. Am. Potato J. 89, 329–350 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Greenway, G. Economic impact of zebra chip control costs on grower returns in seven US states. Am. Potato J. 91, 714–719 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    CNAS. Economic impacts of zebra chip on the Texas potato industry. (Center for North American Studies, 2006).

  5. 5.

    Bové, J. M. Huanglongbing: a destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus. J. Plant Pathol. 88, 7–37 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hodges A. W. & Spreen T. H. Economic Impacts of Citrus Greening (HLB) in Florida, 2006/07–2010/111 (The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, 2012).

  7. 7.

    Lin, H. et al. The complete genome sequence of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’, the bacterium associated with potato zebra chip disease. PLoS ONE 6, e19135 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hartung, J. S., Shao, J. & Kuykendall, L. D. Comparison of the ‘Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus’ genome adapted for an intracellular lifestyle with other members of the Rhizobiales. PLoS ONE 6, e23289 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fagen, J. R. et al. Comparative genomics of cultured and uncultured strains suggests genes essential for free-living growth of Liberibacter. PLoS ONE 9, e84469 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wang, J. et al. Genomic sequence of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ haplotype C and its comparison with haplotype A and B genomes. PLoS ONE 12, e0171531 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pham, V. H. T. & Kim, J. Cultivation of unculturable soil bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 30, 475–484 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Janssen, P. H. New cultivation strategies for terrestrial microorganisms. In Zengler, K. (ed). Accessing Uncultivated Microorganisms. (ASM Press, Washington, DC, 2008). p 173–192.

  13. 13.

    Davis, K. E. R., Joseph, S. J. & Janssen, P. H. Effects of growth medium, inoculum size, and incubation time on culturability and isolation of soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 826–834 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kaeberlein, T., Lewis, K. & Epstein, S. S. Isolating “Uncultivable” microorganisms in pure xulture in a simulated natural environment. Science 296, 1127–1129 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nichols, D. et al. Use of Ichip for high-throughput in situ cultivation of “uncultivable” microbial species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 2445–2450 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bernert A., Jain M., Munoz-Bodnar A., Davis M. & Gabriel D. W. Assessment of growth media requirements for Liberibacters and making L. crescens more Las-like. In Proc. the 5th International Research Conference on Huanglongbing (2017).

  17. 17.

    Merfa, M. V. et al. Progress and obstacles in culturing ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, the bacterium associated with huanglongbing. Phytopathology 109, 1092–1101 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Naranjo, E. et al. Liberibacter crescens biofilm formation in vitro: establishment of a model system for pathogenic ‘Candidatus Liberibacter spp’. Sci. Rep. 9, 5150 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ha, P. T. et al. Host-free biofilm culture of “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus,” the bacterium associated with Huanglongbing. Biofilm 1, 100005 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sechler, A. et al. Cultivation of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, ‘Ca. L. africanus’, and ‘Ca. L. americanus’ associated with huanglongbing. Phytopathology 99, 480–486 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Parker, J. K. et al. Viability of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ prolonged by addition of citrus juice to culture medium. Phytopathology 104, 15–26 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Young, J. M., Kuykendall, L. D., Martínez-Romero, E., Kerr, A. & Sawada, H. A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajudie et al. 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51, 89–103 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Giri, A. & Narasu, M. L. Transgenic hairy roots: recent trends and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 18, 1–22 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ron, M. et al. Identification of novel loci regulating interspecific variation in root morphology and cellular development in tomato. Plant Physiol. 162, 755–768 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lucas, M. et al. SHORT-ROOT regulates primary, lateral, and adventitious root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 155, 384–398 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ron, M. et al. Hairy root transformation using Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a tool for exploring cell type-specific gene expression and function using tomato as a model. Plant Physiol. 166, 455–469 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ono, N. N. & Tian, L. The multiplicity of hairy root cultures: prolific possibilities. Plant Sci. 180, 439–446 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Desoignies, N. & Legreve, A. In vitro dual culture of Polymyxa betae in Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed sugar beet hairy roots in liquid media. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 58, 424–425 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Qu, X. & Christ, B. J. In vitro culture of the obligate parasite Spongospora subterranea (Cercozoa; Plasmodiophorida) associated with root-inducing transferred-DNA transformed potato hairy roots. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 54, 465–467 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Enders, J. F., Weller, T. H. & Robbins, F. C. Cultivation of the Lansing strain of poliomyelitis virus in cultures of various human embryonic tissues. Science 109, 85–87 (1949).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Steinhardt, E., Israeli, C. & Lambert, R. A. Studies on the cultivation of the virus of vaccinia. J. Infect. Dis. 13, 294–300 (1913).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cox, H. R. Growth of viruses and rickettsiae in the developing chick embryo. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 55, 236–247 (1952).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    McClelland, L. Simultaneous cultivation of typhus rickettsiae and influenza virus in the developing chick embryo. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 63, 427–431 (1946).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Litwin, J. A simple method for cultivation of viruses and rickettsiae in the chorio-allantoic ectoderm of the chick embryo by inoculation via the air sac. J. Infect. Dis. 101, 100–108 (1957).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yoshino, K. One-day egg culture of animal viruses with special reference to the production of anti-rabies vaccine. Jpn. J. Med. Sci. Biol. 20, 111–125 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pelzek, A. J., Schuch, R., Schmitz, J. E. & Fischetti, V. A. Isolation, culture, and characterization of bacteriophages. Curr. Protoc. Essent. Lab. Tech. 7, 4–4 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Levy, J., Ravindran, A., Gross, D., Tamborindeguy, C. & Pierson, E. Translocation of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’, the Zebra Chip Pathogen, in potato and tomato. Phytopathology 101, 1285–1291 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sengoda, V. G., Cooper, W. R., Swisher, K. D., Henne, D. C. & Munyaneza, J. E. Latent period and transmission of “Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum” by the potato psyllid Bactericera cockerelli (Hemiptera: Triozidae). PLoS ONE 9, e93475 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hocquellet, A., Toorawa, P., Bove, J.-M. & Garnier, M. Detection and identification of the two Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing by PCR amplification of ribosomal protein genes of the β operon. Mol. Cell. Probe 13, 373–379 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zheng, Z. et al. Unusual five copies and dual forms of nrdB in “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus”: biological implications and PCR detection application. Sci. Rep. 6, 39020 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Achor, D. et al. Dynamics of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ movement and sieve-pore plugging in citrus sink cells. Plant Physiol. 182, 882–891 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ammar, E.-D., Achor, D. & Levy, A. Immuno-ultrastructural localization and putative multiplication sites of huanglongbing bacterium in Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri. Insects 10, 422 (2019).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Deng, H. et al. Phloem regeneration is a mechanism for huanglongbing-tolerance of “Bearss” lemon and “LB8-9” Sugar Belle® mandarin. Front. Plant. Sci. 10, 277 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kumar, N., Kiran, F. & Etxeberria, E. Huanglongbing-induced anatomical changes in citrus fibrous root orders. Hortic. Sci. 53, 829–837 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Castelló, M. J., Medina-Puche, L., Lamilla, J. & Tornero, P. NPR1 paralogs of Arabidopsis and their role in salicylic acid perception. PLoS ONE 13, e0209835 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Mandadi, K. K., Irigoyen, S. C. & Mirkov, T. E. Methods, compositions, and systems for culturing and characterizing fastidious plant microbes. USPTO Application Number: 15/353,645 (2016).

  47. 47.

    Crane, C., Wright, E., Dixon, R. A. & Wang, Z.-Y. Transgenic Medicago truncatula plants obtained from Agrobacterium tumefaciens-transformed roots and Agrobacterium rhizogenes-transformed hairy roots. Planta 223, 1344–1354 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Alagarsamy, K., Shamala, L. F. & Wei, S. Protocol: high-efficiency in-planta Agrobacterium-mediated transgenic hairy root induction of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis. Plant Methods 14, 17 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Khandual, S. & Reddy, P. M. Rapid, efficient and high-performance protocol for Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated hairy root transformation of the common bean Phaseolus vulgaris. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 5, 333 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Robatzek, S. & Somssich, I. E. Targets of AtWRKY6 regulation during plant senescence and pathogen defense. Genes Dev. 16, 1139–1149 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Robatzek, S. & Somssich, I. E. A new member of the Arabidopsis WRKY transcription factor family, AtWRKY6, is associated with both senescence-and defence-related processes. Plant J. 28, 123–133 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Segura, A., Moreno, M., Molina, A. & Garcı́a-Olmedo, F. Novel defensin subfamily from spinach (Spinacia oleracea). FEBS Lett. 435, 159–162 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Mirkov, T. E. & Mandadi, K. K. Pathogen resistant citrus compositions, organisms, systems, and methods. USPTO Application Number: 15/212,041. (2016).

  54. 54.

    Stover, E. et al. Screening antimicrobial peptides in vitro for use in developing transgenic citrus resistant to huanglongbing and citrus canker. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 138, 142–148 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ding, Y. et al. Opposite roles of salicylic acid receptors NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4 in transcriptional regulation of plant immunity. Cell 173, 1454–1467 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kuai, X., MacLeod, B. J. & Després, C. Integrating data on the Arabidopsis NPR1/NPR3/NPR4 salicylic acid receptors; a differentiating argument. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 235 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Wang, W. et al. Structural basis of salicylic acid perception by Arabidopsis NPR proteins. Nature 586, 1–6 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Fister, A. S., Landherr, L., Maximova, S. N. & Guiltinan, M. J. Transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 machinery targeting TcNPR3 enhances defense response in Theobroma cacao. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 268 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Pillitteri, L. J., Bemis, S. M., Shpak, E. D. & Torii, K. U. Haploinsufficiency after successive loss of signaling reveals a role for ERECTA-family genes in Arabidopsis ovule development. Development 134, 3099–3109 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Birchler, J. A. & Veitia, R. A. The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics. Plant Cell 19, 395–402 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Veitia, R. A., Bottani, S. & Birchler, J. A. Gene dosage effects: nonlinearities, genetic interactions, and dosage compensation. Trends Genet. 29, 385–393 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Herskowitz, I. Functional inactivation of genes by dominant negative mutations. Nature 329, 219–222 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Noutoshi, Y. et al. Novel plant immune-priming compounds identified via high-throughput chemical screening target salicylic acid glucosyltransferases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 3795–3804 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Serrano, M., Kombrink, E. & Meesters, C. Considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biology. Front. Plant. Sci. 6, 131 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Li, J. et al. The in planta effective concentration of oxytetracycline against Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus for suppression of citrus huanglongbing. Phytopathology 109, 2046–2054 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Xin, X. et al. Efficiency of biodegradable and pH-responsive polysuccinimide nanoparticles (PSI-NPs) as smart nanodelivery systems in grapefruit: in vitro cellular investigation. Macromol. Biosci. 18, 1800159 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine. A Review of the Citrus Greening Research and Development Efforts Supported by the Citrus Research and Development Foundation: Fighting a Ravaging Disease (National Academies Press, 2018).

  68. 68.

    Zhang, M. et al. Effective antibiotics against ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in HLB-affected citrus plants identified via the graft-based evaluation. PLoS ONE 9, e111032 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Zhang, M. et al. Field evaluation of integrated management for mitigating citrus huanglongbing in Florida. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1890 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Li, J., Trivedi, P. & Wang, N. Field evaluation of plant defense inducers for the control of citrus huanglongbing. Phytopathology 106, 37–46 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Folimonov, A. S., Folimonova, S. Y., Bar-Joseph, M. & Dawson, W. O. A stable RNA virus-based vector for citrus trees. Virology 368, 205–216 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Scholthof, K. B., Mirkov, T. E. & Scholthof, H. B. Plant virus gene vectors: biotechnology applications in agriculture and medicine. Genet. Eng. 24, 67–85 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Dutt, M., Barthe, G., Irey, M. & Grosser, J. Transgenic citrus expressing an Arabidopsis NPR1 gene exhibit enhanced resistance against huanglongbing (HLB; Citrus Greening). PLoS ONE 10, e0137134 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Davis, M. J., Mondal, S. N., Chen, H., Rogers, M. E. & Brlansky, R. H. Co-cultivation of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ with Actinobacteria from Citrus with huanglongbing. Plant Dis. 92, 1547–1550 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Leonard, M. T., Fagen, J. R., Davis-Richardson, A. G., Davis, M. J. & Triplett, E. W. Complete genome sequence of Liberibacter crescens BT-1. Stand. Genom. Sci. 7, 271–283 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Barnett, M. J., Solow-Cordero, D. E. & Long, S. R. A high-throughput system to identify inhibitors of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus transcription regulators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 18009–18014 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Jain, M. et al. Liberibacter crescens is a cultured surrogate for functional genomics of uncultured pathogenic ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ spp. and is naturally competent for transformation. Phytopathology 109, 1811–1819 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Clarke, J. D., Volko, S. M., Ledford, H., Ausubel, F. M. & Dong, X. Roles of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene in cpr-induced resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12, 2175–2190 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Delaney, T., Friedrich, L. & Ryals, J. Arabidopsis signal transduction mutant defective in chemically and biologically induced disease resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6602–6606 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lu, H. Dissection of salicylic acid-mediated defense signaling networks. Plant Signal. Behav. 4, 713–717 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Zhang, X., Chen, S. & Mou, Z. Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for regulation of salicylate tolerance, isochorismate synthase 1 expression and salicylate accumulation in Arabidopsis. J. Plant Physiol. 167, 144–148 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Zhang, X. et al. Arabidopsis SDG8 potentiates the sustainable transcriptional induction of the pathogenesis-related genes PR1 and PR2 during plant defense response. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 277 (2020).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Wang, K.-D., Borrego, E. J., Kenerley, C. M. & Kolomiets, M. V. Oxylipins other than jasmonic acid are xylem-resident signals regulating systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma virens in maize. Plant Cell 32, 166–185 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Sauer, A. V. et al. Seasonal variation in populations of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus trees in Paraná state, Brazil. Plant Dis. 99, 1125–1132 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Graham, J., Johnson, E., Gottwald, T. & Irey, M. Presymptomatic fibrous root decline in citrus trees caused by huanglongbing and potential interaction with Phytophthora spp. Plant Dis. 97, 1195–1199 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Johnson, E., Wu, J., Bright, D. & Graham, J. Association of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ root infection, but not phloem plugging with root loss on huanglongbing-affected trees prior to appearance of foliar symptoms. Plant Pathol. 63, 290–298 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Louzada, E. S. et al. Distribution of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ above and below ground in Texas Citrus. Phytopathology 106, 702–709 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Lebeis, S. L. et al. Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa. Science 349, 860–864 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Huanglongbing impairs the rhizosphere-to-rhizoplane enrichment process of the citrus root-associated microbiome. Microbiome 5, 97 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Xu, J. et al. The structure and function of the global citrus rhizosphere microbiome. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Li, W. et al. Multiplex real-time PCR for detection, identification and quantification of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ in potato plants with zebra chip. J. Microbiol. Methods 78, 59–65 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Porter, J. R. & Flores, H. Host range and implications of plant infection by Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 10, 387–421 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Lin, H. et al. Genetic diversity of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’ strains in the United States and Mexico revealed by simple sequence repeat markers. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 132, 297–308 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Folimonova, S. Y. & Achor, D. S. Early events of citrus greening (Huanglongbing) disease development at the ultrastructural level. Phytopathology 100, 949–958 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Lei, Y. et al. CRISPR-P: a web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Mol. Plant 7, 1494–1496 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Fauser, F., Schiml, S. & Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 79, 348–359 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Cody, W. B., Scholthof, H. B. & Mirkov, T. E. Multiplexed gene editing and protein overexpression using a Tobacco mosaic virus viral vector. Plant Physiol. 175, 23–35 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Hsiau T. et al. Inference of CRISPR edits from Sanger trace data. BioRxiv (2018).

  100. 100.

    Avila, C. A. et al. Loss of function of FATTY ACID DESATURASE7 in tomato enhances basal aphid resistance in a salicylate-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 158, 2028–2041 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Mafra, V. et al. Reference genes for accurate transcript normalization in citrus genotypes under different experimental conditions. PLoS ONE 7, e31263 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Almeyda León, I. H., Rocha Peña, M. A., Piña Razo, J., & Martínez Soriano, J. P. The use of polymerase chain reaction and molecular hybridization for detection of phytoplasmas in different plant species in México. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 19, 1–9 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported in part by funds from a Foundation for Food and Agricultural Research New Innovator Award (2018-534299), by USDA-NIFA-CDRE (2018-70016-28198) to K.K.M., and by Texas A&M AgriLife Research Insect-Vectored Disease Seed Grants (124190-96210 to K.K.M. and 114185-96180 to C.A.A.). The authors acknowledge support of several citrus and commodity crop boards and stakeholders: Texas Citrus Pest and Disease Management Corporation and Texas Citrus Mutual (TX), Wonderful Citrus (TX), U.S. Citrus (TX), Rio Farms (TX), J&D Produce (TX), J. W. Farms (TX), Southern Gardens Citrus (FL), Philip Rucks Nursery (FL) and Citrus Research Board (CA). The authors acknowledge Carissa Villareal, Victoria Garza, Esmeralda Mendez, Ninfa Ramos, Victoria Mora and Rolando Mireles (Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Weslaco, TX) for their technical support with citrus, potato and psyllid propagation and diagnostics. The authors also thank Keerthi Rathore, Karen Scholthof, Herman Scholthof (Texas A&M University, College Station, TX), Will Cody (Stanford University, CA) and Holger Puchta (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany) for kindly providing various reagents and plasmid resources.

Author information




K.K.M. and S.I. developed the concept and designed the experiments. S.I., M.R., S.P., P.N., M.G., R.B., D.R., C.L., Z.G., and D.A. performed the experiments and conducted the data analysis. S.I., A.L., M.K., M.S., I.B., C.A., M.S.I., and K.K.M. supervised the study. S.I., M.R., and K.K.M. prepared the paper and all authors reviewed the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kranthi K. Mandadi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The Texas A&M University System has filed patent applications for the microbial hairy root system [15/353,645 and 16/54,178, status pending]. K.K.M., S.I., M.R., S.P., and P.N. are co-inventors on the related disclosures and patents. Southern Gardens Citrus (Clewiston, FL) has licensed rights in these patents and patent applications from The Texas A&M University System. A disclosure of invention for the compounds screened using this system and a U.S. provisional patent application (63031962) has been submitted. Southern Gardens Citrus also provided matching funds to the Foundation for Food and Agricultural Research New Innovator Award (2018-534,299) to K.K.M. Co-author M.S.I. (Director of Research and Business Development, Southern Gardens Citrus) contributed to the study design for screening antimicrobial peptides, data analysis, and preparation of the manuscript. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Ed Stover, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Irigoyen, S., Ramasamy, M., Pant, S. et al. Plant hairy roots enable high throughput identification of antimicrobials against Candidatus Liberibacter spp.. Nat Commun 11, 5802 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing