Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tuning reactivity of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis by regulating TiOx overlayer over Ru/TiO2 nanocatalysts

Abstract

The activity of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) on metal-based nanocatalysts can be greatly promoted by the support of reducible oxides, while the role of support remains elusive. Herein, by varying the reduction condition to regulate the TiOx overlayer on Ru nanocatalysts, the reactivity of Ru/TiO2 nanocatalysts can be differentially modulated. The activity in FTS shows a volcano-like trend with increasing reduction temperature from 200 to 600 °C. Such a variation of activity is characterized to be related to the activation of CO on the TiOx overlayer at Ru/TiO2 interfaces. Further theoretical calculations suggest that the formation of reduced TiOx occurs facilely on the Ru surface, and it involves in the catalytic mechanism of FTS to facilitate the CO bond cleavage kinetically. This study provides a deep insight on the mechanism of TiOx overlayer in FTS, and offers an effective approach to tuning catalytic reactivity of metal nanocatalysts on reducible oxides.

Introduction

Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) offers a powerful way to convert syngas (a mixture of CO and H2) to long-chain hydrocarbons, by which the transformation of nonpetroleum resources (derived from coal, natural gas, or biomass) into high value-added chemicals and fuels becomes economically efficient and environmentally friendly1,2,3. The most challenging step in this process is consented as the CO activation, with which the further hydrogenation to CHx (x = 1, 2, 3) species for the carbon chain growth becomes facile on the surfaces of late transition metals like Fe, Co, Ru, and Rh4,5,6,7. Among these metals, Ru is identified to be intrinsic of high activity and selectivity in FTS8. In particular, large particle sizes of Ru (~8 nm) are highly desirable9,10,11, on which the direct or H-assisted CO dissociation is greatly facilitated12,13. As such, great efforts have been made on modulating the surface structure of Ru-based catalysts, including by tuning particle size9,10,11, changing crystal phase14, and varying exposed plane15, to further promote the catalytic performance of Ru catalysts.

Beyond that, there are strong metal–support interactions (SMSI) on supported metal catalysts when reducible oxide such as TiO2 is used as a support16,17. More specifically, reducible oxide migrates to the metal surface by forming a thin overlayer under the reduction condition18, which then results in a unique metal/support interface and variegates the behavior of catalyst in reactions19,20,21. The utilization of such SMSI has also been demonstrated to be an alternative strategy to enhance the catalytic reactivity of metal catalysts in FTS22,23. This promoted effect is generally attributed to the interface between metal and support, which serves as a new active site with an improved activity in the reactions18,23. However, the catalytic mechanism and the intrinsic roles of such newly generated interfaces are remaining elusive.

In this research, by regulating a TiOx overlayer on the Ru nanoparticles (~2 nm), the catalytic activity of this Ru/TiO2 nanocatalyst in FTS can be boosted. With various characterizations and theoretical modeling, the reduced TiOx overlayer on Ru nanocatalysts is demonstrated to participate in and dramatically facilitate the bond cleavage of CO. The results of this work are expected to play an important role in the mechanism understanding of SMSI in FTS, and also provide guidance with regard to tuning the catalytic properties of metal nanocatalysts supported on reducible oxides.

Results

Structural characterization

With the aim to investigate the effect of TiOx overlayer covered over the Ru nanoparticles (NPs) on the reactivity in FTS, in the present work, we use wet impregnation method to fabricate Ru-based catalysts with small-sized metal nanoparticles by using rutile TiO2 as a support24. In this text, catalysts reduced at specific temperatures were denoted as Ru/TiO2-x, where x refers to reduction temperatures (x = 200–600). The loading of Ru, after calcination in air and the following thorough chlorides removal process, has been determined to be 2.2 wt% by ICP-OES. As indicated by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) testing (Supplementary Table 1), different Ru/TiO2-x samples are similar in physical textures, with almost the identical surface areas and pore volumes.

Meanwhile, all Ru/TiO2 samples are found to possess analogous morphologies of metal NPs, that is, the Ru NPs are all well dispersed on the support and have a uniform size distribution with an average diameter of ~2 nm (Fig. 1a, b and Supplementary Figs. 13). It was attributed to the usage of rutile TiO2 as the support in our research, which possesses the same crystal phase and comparable lattice parameters with that of RuO2 (Supplementary Table 2). As a result, the calcination step by formation of RuO2/TiO2 interphase helps to resist the aggregation of metal nanoparticles even after the high-temperature pretreatment (Supplementary Fig. 4). On the other hand, however, there are significant discrepancies on the micro-structures of Ru NPs on the TiO2 support when pretreated at different reduction temperatures (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 5). In detail, a distinct morphology of Ru NP can be resolved on the support when sample was reduced at a temperature below 300 °C, while a visible coating on the Ru NPs can be distinguishable after higher temperature pre-reduction. In terms of the SMSI between Ru and rutile TiO2, it was ascribed to the TiOx overlayer over the Ru NPs under high-temperature reduction condition, and the migration of TiOx over Ru NPs was initiated at a reduction temperature higher than 300 °C.

Fig. 1: Morphological study of the Ru/TiO2 catalysts.
figure1

a Elemental mapping of Ru/Ti/O in the fresh Ru/TiO2 catalyst. b HAADF-STEM image of the Ru/TiO2 catalyst pretreated at 600 °C (Ru/TiO2-600 sample) with the metal size distribution. c HRTEM image of the Ru/TiO2-600 catalyst.

To get a qualitative comparison of the exposure of Ru species after coating by TiOx overlayer, the chemisorption of CO and H2 were measured to estimate the Ru dispersion on these Ru/TiO2-x samples. As seen in Table 1, the values obtained by different probe molecules give the same tendency of the metal dispersions for different Ru/TiO2-x samples, that is, the dispersion of Ru decreases with increasing the reduction temperature from 300 to 600 °C. This can be explained by a gradual encapsulation of the Ru NPs by TiOx overlayer as increasing the reduction temperature from 300 to 600 °C, which was in good agreement with the TEM observations. As compared, the dispersion derived from H2 chemisorption was lower than that from CO chemisorption. It might be caused by the Run+ sites at the Ru–TiO2 interface, which are unavailable for H2 chemisorption due to the SMSI effects25, but it can be readily involved in CO chemisorption as indicated in our further in situ DRIFT spectra experiments. Even so, the H2 uptakes on the Ru/TiO2-200 sample was found to be less than that of the Ru/TiO2-300. This can be explained by the results of H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR), in which the predominant reduction of Ru/TiO2 to metallic Ru occurring at a temperature higher than 200 °C (Supplementary Fig. 6). In addition, the decline of the surface metallic Ru exposure by a gradual encapsulation of the Ru NPs by TiOx overlayer as increasing the reduction temperature was also confirmed by the underpotential deposition of copper (Cu upd) experiments, with which the metallic surface area can be semi-quantified in terms of the integral area of current for the reduction deposition of copper on the exposed metal surface26 (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table 3).

Table 1 H2 and CO chemisorption results for different Ru/TiO2−x samples.

The evolution of Ru/TiO2 catalysts at different temperature reductions was also investigated with X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). The extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) of Ru K-edge and the fitting results (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 4) have demonstrated that the coordination number (CN) associated with Ru–Ru pair (~2.67 Å) is increased gradually from 2.2 to 5.3 as the reduction temperature increased from 200 to 600 °C, while the CN of the Ru–O pair (~1.98 Å) presents an inverse tendency by decreasing from 4.0 to 2.4. It suggests a gradual improvement of the reduction degree of ruthenium oxide to metallic phase. Correspondingly, a shift of edge energy towards Ru foil was observed by the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) (Supplementary Fig. 8). Nevertheless, the inevitable Ru–O bonding for Ru/TiO2 samples indicates a strong interfacial interaction between Ru and TiO2, further confirming the formation of TiOx coating on the Ru NPs. On the other hand, the soft XANES spectra at the Ti L3,2-edge (Fig. 2b) exhibit a decline in peak intensities with the increase of pretreatment temperature, indicative of an increasing degree of the reduction of TiO2, owing to the formation of TiOx overlayer on Ru NPs. The growth of the reduced TiOx overlayer was also evidenced by the increased concentration of Ti3+ species accompanying by the decreased ratio of surface Ru/Ti estimated from the Ti-2p and Ru-3p in XPS results (Supplementary Fig. 9 and Supplementary Table 5).

Fig. 2: The evolution of Ru/TiO2 catalysts reduced at different temperatures.
figure2

a Fourier transforms of the k3-weighted EXAFS of Ru K-edge for Ru foil, RuO2, and the Ru/TiO2 catalysts pretreated at different temperatures (Ru/TiO2-x samples). b Ti L3,2-edge XANES for the Ru/TiO2 catalysts pretreated at different temperatures (Ru/TiO2-x samples). c A schematic illustration of the structural evolution of Ru/TiO2 at different stages of reduction.

On the basis of the above observations, the structure evolution of Ru/TiO2 at different stages of reduction was then suggested in Fig. 2c. Benefiting from the lattice matching of RuO2/TiO2 interphase, a small size of Ru NPs with the improved sintering resistance can be facilely acquired by the following reduction pretreatment. In the initial step of reduction, e.g., Ru/TiO2-300, a dominant metallic Ru will be exposed, and it serves as a typical Ru-based nanocatalysts in FTS. With further increasing the reduction temperature, the SMSI between Ru and TiO2 governs the surface exposure of Ru NPs, and the TiOx thin layer begins to migrate and coating the Ru surface, resulting in a shrinkage of metallic Ru surface by the TiOx overlayer (like that on Ru/TiO2-450). Finally, for the Ru/TiO2-600 sample, an excessive coverage of TiOx on Ru NPs causes a dominant TiOx overlayer on Ru nanocatalysts. Accordingly, a tunable degree of TiOx overlayer on Ru NPs can be easily achieved by varying the pretreatment condition, and it thus provides us an opportunity to explore the effect of metal/support interface of Ru/TiO2 on the activity in FTS.

Catalytic performance

The catalytic performances of various Ru/TiO2-x catalysts in FTS were then evaluated at 160 °C with a 2 MPa reaction pressure according to our preliminary optimization of experiment conditions for achieving a high C5+ selectivity under a relatively mild condition (Supplementary Fig. 10). Notably, as shown in Fig. 3a and Supplementary Figs. 11, 12, all Ru/TiO2-x catalysts possess an excellent C5+ selectivity with a value up to 90%, indicating the promising application prospect of Ru/TiO2 in FTS for high-carbon products. While the intrinsic reaction rate (reflected as the TOF value) greatly relies on the pretreatment temperature, and shows a volcano-like trend with the increase of reduction temperature (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 13 and Supplementary Table 6). As compared, samples of Ru/TiO2-200 and Ru/TiO2-300 manifest a much lower intrinsic activity (0.003 s−1). A great promotion of activity was observed for the Ru/TiO2-400 catalyst. Among these catalysts, the Ru/TiO2-450 exhibits the highest activity with an intrinsic TOF value of 0.039 s−1, which was also superior to other Ru-based catalysts reported previously (Supplementary Table 7). The further increasing of pretreatment temperature, however, causes an activity decay of catalysts, with a TOF value of only 0.021 s−1 for Ru/TiO2-600. Correspondingly, a reverse variation of apparent activation energy (Ea) was obtained, i.e., the Ru/TiO2-450 presents the lowest Ea with a calculated value of 62.0 kJ mol−1, which was much lower than the values of other Ru/TiO2 catalysts (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3: Catalytic results of the Ru/TiO2 catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis.
figure3

a Catalytic performance of the Ru/TiO2 catalysts pretreated at different temperatures (Ru/TiO2-x samples). Reaction conditions: 2 MPa, 160 °C, space velocity = 1200–6000 mL h−1 gcat−1, H2/CO/Ar = 64/32/4. b Arrhenius plots for CO hydrogenation over the Ru/TiO2-x catalysts.

The particle size of metal was essential in determining the performance of Ru-based catalysts in FTS. The activity increases as the particle size of Ru nanocatalyst increased, with the small-sized Ru NPs behaving a rather poor activity9,10,11. This explains well the low activity of our small-sized Ru/TiO2 catalysts reduced at low temperatures (Ru/TiO2-200 and Ru/TiO2-300 samples) as well as Ru NPs supported on the irreducible support (Ru/Al2O3-450 in Supplementary Fig. 14 and Supplementary Table 8). While an enhanced activity of Ru/TiO2-450 catalyst suggests that the TiOx overlayer on Ru NPs has a positive contribution on the reactivity of Ru nanocatalysts. However, in terms of the decline of activity for the Ru/TiO2-600 catalyst covered dominantly by TiOx overlayer, the only TiOx overlayer cannot achieve a high activity for the FTS reaction. In this regard, the interface between metal and support of Ru/TiO2 plays a crucial role on the activity promotion, where both the metallic Ru and TiOx overlayer are indispensable. The optimized composition of TiOx overlayer and Ru NPs on Ru/TiO2-450 catalyst makes it possess an enhanced activity.

Furthermore, the Ru/TiO2-450 catalyst also owns an excellent stability in the steady running state of FTS (Supplementary Figs. 10, 11). HAADF-STEM image of the spent Ru/TiO2-450 catalyst suggests that the size of Ru can keep constant after testing (Supplementary Fig. 15). This was also benefited from the SMSI in the Ru/TiO2-450 catalyst, which greatly prohibits the size aggregation of Ru during FTS process.

Catalytic mechanism

The role of the TiOx overlayer was then studied by the steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis (SSITKA)27,28, by which the evolution of intermediates with the associated coverage and reactivity can be acquired (Supplementary Fig. 16). Limited by the atmospheric pressure condition in this analysis, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 17, CH4 selectivity has an increase because of the preference of hydrogenation over C–C coupling for CHx intermediates. Notably, a good correlation between the intrinsic activity (TOF) of CO consumption and methane generation can be set up. As such, the coverage of CHx (represented as θCH4 in SSITKA) was determined as a function of reduction temperature of Ru/TiO2 (Fig. 4a). From our results, the activity improvement of Ru/TiO2-450 can be attributed to the increased coverage of CHx intermediates on the catalyst surface29. By considering the comparable size of Ru for different Ru/TiO2 samples, a promoted effect toward CO activation to generate CHx intermediates with the aid of TiOx overlayer can be expected on the Ru/TiO2-450 catalyst.

Fig. 4: The participation of the TiOx overlayer in the C–O bond dissociation.
figure4

a The correlation between the intrinsic activity (TOFCO and TOFCH4) and the coverage of active surface CHx intermediates (represented by θCH4) as obtained by SSITKA experiments. Performing condition: 200 °C, 0.185 MPa, H2/CO = 10. b, c Microcalorimetric measures of CO chemisorption and the distribution of differential heat on the Ru/TiO2-x samples. d In situ DRIFT spectra obtained after CO adsorption and evacuation with helium at 160 °C, over the Ru/TiO2-x catalysts. e Evolution of the COad species during H2 flow at 160 °C as determined using in situ DRIFT spectra, over the Ru/TiO2-450 catalyst.

To confirm our proposed mechanism of CO activation, the micro-calorimetry toward CO was measured for Ru/TiO2 samples (Fig. 4b, c). The amount of CO chemisorption follows a trend of Ru/TiO2-300 > Ru/TiO2-450 > Ru/TiO2-600. This can be explained by the decrease exposure of Ru for serving as the adsorbed sites toward CO as increasing reduction temperature. In particular, as compared with other catalysts, Ru/TiO2-450 owns a large portion of CO chemisorption at a relative higher differential heat (>150 kJ mol−1). This was attributed to the CO chemisorption on the interface site, followed by a dissociation of CO with the aid of TiOx overlayer. For comparison, the Ru/TiO2-300 shows a predominant moderate chemisorption toward CO, with a differential heat of 120–150 kJ mol−1 for CO chemisorption on the Ru sites. In contrast, the over-coverage of TiOx on Ru NPs causes a shortage of both the Ru sites and the interfaces for CO chemisorption/dissociation on Ru/TiO2-600.

In situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectra of CO chemisorption on Ru/TiO2-x indicate that there are three distinct υCO bands located at approximately 2136, 2075, and 2056 cm−1 in the carbonyl region (Fig. 4d). Here, the bands at 2136 and 2075 cm−1 were often observed by performing CO adsorption on well-dispersed, partially oxidized Run+ with a low coordination environment, which therefore were ascribed to multi-carbonyl (Run+(CO)x) and mono-carbonyl (Run+–CO) species adsorbed on partially oxidized Run+ sites on the interface, respectively30,31,32. While the peak at 2056 cm−1 was assigned to linear CO adsorption on metallic Ru (Rux–CO)33,34. After purging H2 into the CO-saturated Ru/TiO2, the gaseous CH4 product with a characterized frequency at 3015 cm−1 was detected35, accompanying by the consumption of CO (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 18). More importantly, by the complete consumption of CO of Run+(CO)x and Run+–CO, the further conversion of CO was restrained, with Rux–CO as a predominant chemisorption species on Ru surface. In this case, the interface of partially oxidized Run+ sites were supposed to be the active sites for the FTS reaction. As such, the intensity of CO related to FTS on the Ru/TiO2-450 was found to be more remarkable than that of Ru/TiO2-300 and the Ru/TiO2-600 catalysts (Fig. 4d), which was responsible for its higher activity in FTS.

According to our results, a catalytic mechanism for CO transformation on the Ru/TiO2-x catalysts was then proposed. Due to the SMSI over Ru/TiO2, the TiOx overlayer on Ru NPs provides oxygen vacancies for anchoring the oxygen atoms from the dissociation of carbonyl group; it thus greatly facilitates the dissociation of CO on the Ru/TiOx interface of catalysts as also suggested by Bell and coworkers36, by which the hydrogenation and C–C coupling can be realized on the Ru sites to produce carbon chain products. As for Ru/TiO2-450, the optimized TiOx overlayer on Ru NP offers it a maximized activity in FTS, while the shortage of interface on both the Ru/TiO2-300 and Ru/TiO2-600 samples leads to a lower activity in FTS. As such, the participation of the TiOx overlayer in the C–O bond dissociation process was responsible for the superior reactivity of the Ru/TiO2-450 catalyst.

DFT calculations

Theoretically, we have performed a density functional theory (DFT) study on the CO activation on the model catalyst on a TiOx cluster decorated Ru(001) surface. In Fig. 5a and Supplementary Table 9, we have first studied the thermodynamic stability of different TiOx clusters on the Ru(001) surface at different oxygen chemical potential. As compared with the TiO6 unit in bulk phase of rutile TiO2, the TiOx was reduced facilely on the Ru(001) surface, and the TiO4 cluster was found to be dominant under the oxygen-rich condition. By decreasing the oxygen chemical potential under reduction condition, the reduction of TiO4 occurred readily on the Ru surface through a sequential reduction to TiO3/Ru(001) and TiO2/Ru(001), respectively. This was consistent with the experimental observation of a reduction of the TiOx overlayer under the reduction condition. On the TiO3/Ru(001) surface, the activation of CO by C–O bond cleavage was then estimated, with that occurring on parent Ru(001) surface as a comparison. As we can see in Fig. 5b, the CO bond cleavage on the Ru (001) surface has a much high barrier (2.15 eV), and the laying down of the atop *CO adspecies adsorbed on the surface is the main obstacle during its dissociation, in good agreement with the previous results37,38. In contrast, with a reduced TiO3 cluster decorating on the Ru(001) surface, the bond cleavage of CO adsorbed on the Ru site of interface can be greatly promoted by experiencing a calculated barrier of 1.62 eV, with the aid of TiO3 as the O seizer of carbonyl group to transform to TiO4. Taking into account that our experiments of FTS were conducted at a reaction temperature of 160–200 °C and a reaction pressure of 2 MPa, such a barrier is facile to overcome on the Ru/TiO2 catalysts at the reaction condition of FTS. The as-dissociated C* adspecies can then be conveniently diffused from the TiOx/Ru(001) interface to Ru(001) (0.73 eV) for the further hydrogenation. Meanwhile, the reduction of TiO4/Ru(001) to TiO3/Ru(001) was even thermodynamically more favorable than the surface reduction of O adspecies on the parent Ru(001) surface (Fig. 5a), which can then facilitate the catalytic cycle of CO activation on the interface. As indicated by the previous reports, such C* species is promising to be hydrogenated to CHx species and realize the C–C coupling on the Ru surface to produce the C2+ products39. Accordingly, the Ru/TiO2-450 catalyst, owing to its optimized Ru/TiOx interface for CO activation, shows a superior activity to other Ru/TiO2-x catalysts in FTS.

Fig. 5: Theoretical study of the CO activation on a TiOx cluster decorated Ru(001) surface.
figure5

a Thermodynamic stability of different TiOx/Ru(001) and O/Ru(001) under a variation of the chemical potential of O as referring to TiO3/Ru(001) and Ru(001), respectively, with the atomic configuration in insets. Atom key: Ru (dark blue), O (red), Ti (orange), and C (green). b A possible catalytic mechanism of CO activation at GW level calculations on the TiO3/Ru(001) model surface (red line), with the dissociation of CO on Ru(001) surface as a comparison (blue line).

In conclusion, we have successfully fabricated a highly active Ru/TiO2 catalyst for FTS by fine-tuning the catalyst pre-reduction condition. With increasing the reduction temperature, the TiOx overlayer is gradually enveloping the Ru NPs. The catalyst reduced at 450 °C exhibits a high intrinsic activity under mild conditions with a low apparent activation energy. The participation of TiOx overlayer in promoting CO dissociation plays a vital role in activity enhancement during FTS. An optimized TiOx overlayer on the Ru NPs formed during reduction at 450 °C is evidently able to capture oxygen from carbonyl group adsorbed on the interface of Ru/TiOx. This, in turn, facilitates the cleavage of C–O bonds. This work not only provides an understanding of the mechanism of CO activation on Ru/TiO2 catalysts, but also suggests an effective approach to tailoring the catalytic properties of metal nanocatalysts supported on reducible oxides.

Methods

Catalyst preparation

The Ru/TiO2 catalysts were prepared by an impregnation method using rutile TiO2 as the support. In a typical synthesis, 1.6 g of the aqueous RuCl3·3H2O solution (8.2 wt%, 0.0317 g Ru per gram of solution, AR) was diluted to 30 mL with deionized water. 2.0 g of rutile TiO2 (40 nm, 99.8% metal basis) was then added to the solution and the resulting suspension was evaporated to dry in a 50 °C water bath with the vigorous stirring. The resulting solid was dried at 120 °C overnight, followed by the calcination in air at 300 °C for 3 h. Subsequently, to remove the residual chlorides, the sample was washed repeatedly with a dilute ammonia solution (1 mol L−1), followed by filtrating and washing with deionized water until there was no more precipitate in the filtrate detected by AgNO3 solution (0.1 mol L−1). Finally, the sample was dried at 60 °C overnight. The sample thus obtained was denoted as the fresh Ru/TiO2. Prior to catalytic performance tests, the fresh Ru/TiO2 sample were reduced in situ under a H2 gas flow (20 mL min−1) at specific temperatures. The samples after reduction were denoted as Ru/TiO2-x, where x indicates the reduction temperature (200, 300, 400, 450, 500, or 600 °C). The Ru loading in the Ru/TiO2 catalyst is 2.2 wt% as detected by ICP-OES.

Catalyst characterization

High-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) together with the elemental mapping and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were acquired using a JEOL JEM-2100F microscope operating at 200 kV. The Ru particle size was determined from HAADF-STEM images, and at least 200 particles were counted for each sample. The Ru concentrations in specimens were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) with an ICP-OES 7300DV instrument.

CO and H2 chemisorption experiments

The exposure of Ru species after coating by TiOx was determined by CO and H2 pulse chemisorption on a Micromeritics AutoChem II 2920 instrument. For CO (or H2) chemisorption experiment, the sample (~100 mg) was pretreated with hydrogen at desired temperatures for 1 h, followed by purging with high-purity helium (or argon) for 30 min. After the sample was cooled down to 50 °C, a 5% CO/He (or 10% H2/Ar) mixture was injected into the reactor repeatedly until CO (or H2) adsorption was saturated. The dispersion of Ru was calculated from the amount of CO (or H2) adsorbed by assuming the CO/Ru (or H/Ru) adsorption stoichiometry to be 1/1.

X-ray absorption spectroscopy

Pseudo-in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), including acquiring X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) data at the Ru K-edge, was performed at the BL 14W1 of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), China. A double Si (311) crystal monochromator was used for energy selection. The samples were pretreated in a H2 flow (20 mL min−1) at the desired temperatures for 2 h, followed by sealing with Capton film in a glove box without exposure to air. The spectra were collected at room temperature in the transition mode. The Ti L3,2-edge XANES data was acquired at the XMCD beamline (BL12B) at the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL), China. The Athena software package was used to analyze the data.

CO microcalorimetric measurements

The differential heat of CO adsorption was measured for each specimen at 40 °C using a BT 2.15 Calvet calorimeter connected to gas handling and volumetric systems equipped with MKS 698A Baratron capacitance manometers (±1.33 × 10−2 Pa). Previous to CO adsorption, the samples were treated in a H2 flow at the desired temperatures for 1 h, followed by evacuation for 30 min at the same temperature. After cooling to room temperature in vacuum, the quartz tube was refilled with He and tightly sealed, after which the samples were outgassed at 40 °C overnight in the calorimetric cell. CO adsorption was carried out during the stepwise introduction of pure CO up to a pressure of ~10 Torr at 40 °C.

In situ DRIFTS

In situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectra were acquired using a Bruker Equinox 55 spectrometer equipped with a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector, recorded with a resolution of 4 cm−1. Prior to CO adsorption, the samples were treated in situ in the DRIFT cell under a H2 flow (20 mL min−1) at the desired temperatures for 1 h, followed by purging with a He flow at the same temperature for 30 min. After cooling to 160 °C, a background spectrum was collected, following which the He flow was switched to a 5 vol% CO in He flow (20 mL min−1) that was maintained until saturated adsorption was achieved. The system was purged with He to remove non-adsorbed CO and IR spectra were collected, such that CO adsorption data at 160 °C were obtained. After the treatment with He, the reactivity of adsorbed CO species (COad) was monitored by switching to a 10 vol% H2 in He flow (20 mL min−1). Simultaneously, IR spectra were recorded every 30 s for 10 min. This experiment is referred to the reactivity of COad at 160 °C.

Fischer–Tropsch tests

FTS trials were performed in a stainless-steel fixed-bed reactor with an inner diameter of 12 mm under high pressure. Typically, the Ru/TiO2 catalyst (20–40 mesh, 0.3 g) was diluted with quartz sand (20–40 mesh, 0.9 g) and loaded into the reactor. Prior to each reaction, the catalyst was reduced in a H2 gas flow (20 mL min−1) at the desired temperature (200–600 °C) for 2 h. After the reactor was cooled down, a syngas with a H2/CO ratio of 2/1 (H2/CO/Ar = 64/32/4 (v/v/v)) was introduced into the reactor at a flow rate of 15 mL min−1 (space velocity = 3000 mL gcat−1 h−1). Ar was used as an internal standard to calculate CO conversion and selectivity of CH4 and CO2. The reaction was carried out at 160 °C under 2.0 MPa. After passing through a hot trap (120 °C) and then an ice-bath, the gaseous products were analyzed online using an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-PLOT/Q capillary column connected to a flame ionization detector (FID) and a TDX-01 column connected to a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). The data of the catalytic performances of Ru/TiO2 catalysts were collected at the stable stage after at least 6 h of running. The calculation method for FTS catalytic performance was described in detail in the supplementary information.

SSITKA experiments

Steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis (SSITKA) is a combination of steady-state and transient techniques that can provide a reliable kinetic model to gain insights into the reaction mechanism. In this study, we used SSITKA to explore the activity of the Ru/TiO2-x catalysts with the aim of providing insights into the intrinsic promotional effects. During each SSITKA experiment, 50 mg of the sieved catalyst mixed with 200 mg of SiC was pretreated in situ in a H2/Ar flow (20/20 mL min−1) at the desired temperature (300, 450, or 600 °C). After cooling to 100 °C, the feed was switched to a 12CO/Ar mixture (35 mL min−1, 0.85 bar CO, 1.77 bar inert). CO adsorption was determined by switching from 12CO/Ar to 13CO/Kr without changing the other reaction conditions. Subsequently, the feed was switched to 12CO/H2/Ar (1.5/15/33.5 mL min−1, 1.85 bar) for CO hydrogenation at 200 °C. After 6 h on stream, a switch from 12CO/H2/Ar to 13CO/H2/Kr was employed to study isotopic transients, while maintaining the CO conversion at ~10%. The isotopic transient response was determined by mass spectrometer.

The TOF values were calculated as

$${\mathrm{TOF}}_{{\mathrm{CO}}} = \frac{{R_{{\mathrm{CO}}} \cdot M_{{\mathrm{Ru}}}}}{{D \cdot x_{{\mathrm{Ru}}}}}$$
(1)

and

$${\mathrm{TOF}}_{{\mathrm{CH}}_4} = \frac{{R_{{\mathrm{CO}}} \cdot S_{{\mathrm{CH}}_4} \cdot M_{{\mathrm{Ru}}}}}{{D \cdot x_{{\mathrm{Ru}}}}}$$
(2)

where RCO is the CO consumption in moles per gram of catalyst, SCH4 is the methane selectivity, MRu is the atomic mass of Ru, D is the Ru dispersion and xRu is the Ru loading of the sample.

The surface coverage of intermediates leading to CH4 was calculated as

$$\theta _{{\mathrm{CH}}_4} = \frac{{N_{{\mathrm{CH}}_4}}}{{N_{{\mathrm{Total}}}}}$$
(3)

where NCH4 is the number of intermediates leading to methane and NTotal is the total number of active sites, as determined by the reversible adsorption of CO in the SSITKA experiments.

Computational details

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP, a version of 5.4.4)40,41. The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional was used to initial calculation42. The core and valence electrons were represented by the projector augmented wave (PAW) potential, and the plane wave basis set with a cut-off energy of 500 eV was used. A TiOx cluster covered on a four-layered slab of the close-packed (001) surface derived from the hcp phase of Ru, was used as a model to the TiOx overlayer covered Ru nanocatalyst. A vacuum gap of 15 Å was used to separate periodic images of the slab in the direction perpendicular to the surface. The atoms in the top two layers of Ru(001) were allowed to relax during optimization. The Brillouin zone of the 4 × 4 surface unit cell of Ru(001) was sampled with a 2 × 2 × 1 Monkhorst-Pack grid. Optimized geometries were obtained by minimizing the forces on the atoms below 0.02 eV Å−1. The transition state was first isolated using the climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method and then refined using the dimer method to until force is below 0.02 eV Å−143. After that, the newly developed GW potential was adopted for the further optimization of adsorption geometries and transition states. The resulting transition state was finally confirmed by the normal mode frequency analysis, showing only one imaginary mode. We have first compared the relative stability of different TiOx (x = 1–4) clusters on the Ru(001) surface under different reduction degree condition which can be represented as the variation of chemical potential of oxygen, and was calculated according to the procedure of previous research44. In our calculation, the data of the formation energy of rutile TiO2 was acquired from the reference45. Other computational details are shown in the Supplementary Information.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Zhong, L. et al. Cobalt carbide nanoprisms for direct production of lower olefins from syngas. Nature 538, 84–87 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Li, J. et al. Integrated tuneable synthesis of liquid fuels via Fischer–Tropsch technology. Nat. Catal. 1, 787–793 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Torres Galvis, H. M. et al. Supported iron nanoparticles as catalysts for sustainable production of lower olefins. Science 335, 835–838 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Torres Galvis, H. M. et al. Iron particle size effects for direct production of lower olefins from synthesis gas. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16207–16215 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fischer, N., Clapham, B., Feltes, T. & Claeys, M. Cobalt-based Fischer–Tropsch activity and selectivity as a function of crystallite size and water partial pressure. ACS Catal. 5, 113–121 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sun, J. et al. Highly-dispersed metallic Ru nanoparticles sputtered on H-beta zeolite for directly converting syngas to middle isoparaffins. ACS Catal. 4, 1–8 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ligthart, D. A. J. M. et al. EJM. Identification of step-edge sites on Rh nanoparticles for facile CO dissociation. Catal. Commun. 77, 5–8 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Simonetti, D. A., Rass-Hansen, J., Kunkes, E. L., Soares, R. R. & Dumesic, J. A. Coupling of glycerol processing with Fischer–Tropsch synthesis for production of liquid fuels. Green. Chem. 9, 1073–1083 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Carballo, J. M. G. et al. Catalytic effects of ruthenium particle size on the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. J. Catal. 284, 102–108 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kang, J., Deng, W., Zhang, Q. & Wang, Y. Ru particle size effect in Ru/CNT-catalyzed Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J. Energ. Chem. 22, 321–328 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kang, J., Zhang, S., Zhang, Q. & Wang, Y. Ruthenium nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes as efficient catalysts for selective conversion of synthesis gas to diesel fuel. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 48, 2565–2568 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ojeda, M. et al. CO activation pathways and the mechanism of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. J. Catal. 272, 287–297 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Loveless, B. T., Buda, C., Neurock, M. & Iglesia, E. CO chemisorption and dissociation at high coverages during CO hydrogenation on Ru catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 6107–6121 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    González Carballo, J. M. et al. Support effects on the structure and performance of ruthenium catalysts for the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Catal. Sci. Technol. 1, 1013–1023 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li, W. Z. et al. Chemical insights into the design and development of face-centered cubic ruthenium catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 2267–2276 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tauster, S. J., Fung, S. C., Baker, R. T. K. & Horsley, J. A. Strong interactions in supported-metal catalysts. Science 211, 1121–1125 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tauster, S. J., Fung, S. C. & Garten, R. L. Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 170–175 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Komaya, T. et al. Effects of dispersion and metal-metal oxide interactions on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over Ru/TiO2 and TiO2-promoted Ru/SiO2. J. Catal. 150, 400–406 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Xu, J. et al. Influence of pretreatment temperature on catalytic performance of rutile TiO2-supported ruthenium catalyst in CO2 methanation. J. Catal. 333, 227–237 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Abdel-Mageed, A. M. et al. Selective CO methanation on Ru/TiO2 catalysts: role and influence of metal–support interactions. ACS Catal. 5, 6753–6763 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    van Deelen, T. W., Hernández Mejía, C. & de Jong, K. P. Control of metal-support interactions in heterogeneous catalysts to enhance activity and selectivity. Nat. Catal. 2, 955–970 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kikuchi, E., Matsumoto, M., Takahashi, T., Machino, A. & Morita, Y. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over titania-supported ruthenium catalysts. Appl Catal. 10, 251–260 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hernandez Mejia, C., van Deelen, T. W. & de Jong, K. P. Activity enhancement of cobalt catalysts by tuning metal-support interactions. Nat. Commun. 9, 4459–4466 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lin, Q. et al. Crystal phase effects on the structure and performance of ruthenium nanoparticles for CO2 hydrogenation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 4, 2058–2063 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Badyal, J. P. S. & Lambert, R. M. Surface oxide films and H2/CO chemisorption at the Ru/TiO2 interface: studies with a model planar catalyst. J. Catal. 130, 173–180 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Green, C. L. & Kucernak, A. Determination of the platinum and ruthenium surface areas in platinum-ruthenium alloy electrocatalysts by underpotential deposition of copper. I. Unsupported catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 1036–1047 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yang, J. et al. Reaction mechanism of CO activation and methane formation on Co Fischer–Tropsch catalyst: a combined DFT, transient, and steady-state kinetic modeling. J. Catal. 308, 37–49 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ledesma, C., Yang, J., Chen, D. & Holmen, A. Recent approaches in mechanistic and kinetic studies of catalytic reactions using SSITKA technique. ACS Catal. 4, 4527–4547 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lohitharn, N. & Goodwinjr, J. Impact of Cr, Mn and Zr addition on Fe Fischer–Tropsch synthesis catalysis: investigation at the active site level using SSITKA. J. Catal. 257, 142–151 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hadjiivanov, K. et al. FTIR study of CO interaction with Ru/TiO2 catalysts. J. Catal. 176, 415–425 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    González-Carballo, J. M. et al. In-situ study of the promotional effect of chlorine on the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis with Ru/Al2O3. J. Catal. 332, 177–186 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Elmasides, C., Kondarides, D. I., Grünert, W. & Verykios, X. E. X. P. S. and FTIR study of Ru/Al2O3 and Ru/TiO2 catalysts: reduction characteristics and interaction with a methane-oxygen mixture. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 5227–5239 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Robbins, J. L. Chemistry of supported Ru: CO-induced oxidation of Ru at 310 K. J. Catal. 115, 120–131 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Solymosi, F. & Raskó, J. An infrared study of the influence of CO adsorption on the topology of supported ruthenium. J. Catal. 115, 107–119 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gupta, N. M. et al. FTIR spectroscopic study of the interaction of CO2 and CO2 + H2 over partially oxidized Ru/TiO2 catalyst. J. Catal. 146, 173–184 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Johnson, G. R., Werner, S. & Bell, A. T. An investigation into the effects of Mn promotion on the activity and selectivity of Co/SiO2 for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: evidence for enhanced CO adsorption and dissociation. ACS Catal. 5, 5888–5903 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shetty, S. & van Santen, R. A. CO dissociation on Ru and Co surfaces: the initial step in the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Catal. Today 171, 168–173 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ciobica, I. M. & van Santen, R. A. Carbon monoxide dissociation on planar and stepped Ru(0001) surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 3808–3812 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Filot, I. A., van Santen, R. A. & Hensen, E. J. The optimally performing Fischer-Tropsch catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. 53, 12746–12750 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Reuter, K. & Scheffler, M. Composition, structure, and stability of RuO2(110) as a function of oxygen pressure. Phys. Rev. B 65, 035406 (2001).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 88th edn (Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFA0202804), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB36030200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21978286, 21925803, 21776269), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Z., X.F.Y., X.S., and Y.H. conceived and designed the project. Y.Z. performed the experiments. X.F.Y. carried out the theoretical calculations. X.L.Y. and D.C. finished the SSITKA experiments. H.Q. performed the X-ray absorption experiments. Y.S. conducted the TEM observations. H.D., B.L.L., H.T., and B.L. contributed to the structure characterizations. Y.Z., X.F.Y., X.S., Y.H., and T.Z. analyzed the experimental data and prepared the paper. All authors reviewed and contributed to the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaofeng Yang or Xiong Su or Yanqiang Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Doan Pham Minh and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Yang, X., Yang, X. et al. Tuning reactivity of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis by regulating TiOx overlayer over Ru/TiO2 nanocatalysts. Nat Commun 11, 3185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17044-4

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing