Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Groundwater level observations in 250,000 coastal US wells reveal scope of potential seawater intrusion

Abstract

Seawater intrusion into coastal aquifers can increase groundwater salinity beyond potable levels, endangering access to freshwater for millions of people. Seawater intrusion is particularly likely where water tables lie below sea level, but can also arise from groundwater pumping in some coastal aquifers with water tables above sea level. Nevertheless, no nation-wide, observation-based assessment of the scope of potential seawater intrusion exists. Here we compile and analyze ~250,000 coastal groundwater-level observations made since the year 2000 in the contiguous United States. We show that the majority of observed groundwater levels lie below sea level along more than 15% of the contiguous coastline. We conclude that landward hydraulic gradients characterize a substantial fraction of the East Coast (>18%) and Gulf Coast (>17%), and also parts of the West Coast where groundwater pumping is high. Sea level rise, coastal land subsidence, and increasing water demands will exacerbate the threat of seawater intrusion.

Introduction

Seawater intrusion threatens freshwater resources by rendering coastal groundwaters too saline for drinking or irrigation1,2. Over ~100 million Americans and thousands of farms in coastal counties depend fully or partly on groundwater3. Well water can be impacted by even small amounts of seawater intrusion: groundwater containing more than 2–3% seawater is considered non-potable. Aquifer salinization by seawater is almost irreversible on human timescales, because the intruded seawater occupies small pore spaces that can require decades or centuries to be flushed4,5. Consequently, it is important to identify aquifers that are susceptible to seawater intrusion to inform management actions.

Seawater intrusion can occur naturally or be induced as groundwater is pumped from wells. Even under static, pre-development conditions one would expect seawater to exist at depth beneath low-lying coastal lands, because seawater is denser than freshwater and because tidal variations disperse the fresh–saline interface in coastal aquifers1,2. Climate and land-use changes can reduce recharge, lower groundwater levels, and induce seawater intrusion. Overpumping can lower groundwater levels below sea level, leading to hydraulic gradients that slope downward toward the land (herein landward hydraulic gradients). A landward hydraulic gradient implies that seawater intrusion could occur if the coastal aquifer is well connected to the sea. Identifying locations with landward hydraulic gradients can reveal which aquifers are susceptible to seawater intrusion, because hydraulic gradients drive groundwater flow and influence the depth at which aquifers transition from fresh to brackish water6,7,8. Seawater intrusion can occur even before landward hydraulic gradients form, because seawater’s higher density can cause it to move landward even if coastal water tables are above sea level.

To date, our understanding of seawater intrusion is founded on either (i) local-scale studies (Fig. 1; ref. 9) or (ii) hydrologic models10,11.

Fig. 1: Local-scale studies of submarine groundwater discharges and seawater intrusion.
figure1

These local-scale studies use a variety of approaches, including hydrological models, seepage meters, and solute concentration measurements (see review by Santos et al. 65). We show locations where local-scale studies have demonstrated or simulated the occurrence of submarine groundwater discharge (blue points), or a landward gradient or seawater intrusion (red points). For primary results and discussion of important local considerations see refs. 66,67,68. For reviews of studies of submarine groundwater discharge research and seawater intrusion prior to the year 2000 see refs. 9,69. For primary references see Supplementary Table 5), which reviews 108 studies. We present a series of conceptual models based on previous studies as cross sections. a In Puget Sound12,13,14 (Washington state), high relief, high recharge rates and modest groundwater use create seaward hydraulic gradients and concomitant submarine groundwater discharge. b In the Salinas Valley15,16,17 (California), decades of extensive groundwater pumping and limited local recharge (due to a shallow aquitard) have increased landward hydraulic gradients and induced seawater intrusion. Seawater has moved several kilometers inland in both the shallow (180-foot) aquifer and the deeper (400-foot) aquifer. c In the West Coast Basin18,19 (Los Angeles, California), high groundwater withdrawals have created landward hydraulic gradients and seawater intrusion, but the installation and operation of injection wells have increased hydraulic heads in the aquifer close to the coast. d In the Gulf Coast of Alabama20, hydraulic heads lie just above sea level yet some intrusion has occurred. e Near Miami39,40 (Florida), a shallow carbonate aquifer (Biscayne) has experienced seawater intrusion, likely exacerbated by the construction of leaky canals. f In Savannah27 (Georgia), groundwater withdrawals have drawn down a piezometric surface that once lay above sea level to now lie below sea level, creating a landward hydraulic gradient. g In Cape May35 (New Jersey), landward gradients are clearly reflected in piezometric data for confined aquifers (e.g., the Cohansey and Atlantic City 800-foot sand), highlighting the potential vulnerability of confined aquifers to seawater intrusion. Aquifer outlines are from water.usgs.gov/ogw/aquifer/map.html.

(i) Local-scale studies provide the foundation of current conceptual models of coastal aquifers and seawater. The 108 local-scale studies compiled in Supplementary Table 5 demonstrate important features that motivate our study: (a) areas with high topographic relief and high recharge rates can maintain water tables above sea level, inducing groundwater discharge into the sea and limiting seawater intrusion (e.g., Puget Sound12,13,14; Fig. 1a); (b) extensive groundwater pumping can lead to seawater intrusion (e.g., Salinas Valley15,16,17; Fig. 1b), making seawater intrusion relatively common in low-lying alluvial valleys on the West Coast (e.g., Los Angeles18,19; Fig. 1c) and along the Gulf20,21,22,23 and East24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 Coasts where extensive coastal plain aquifers are tapped for irrigation and public water supplies (Fig. 1d–g); and (c) seawater intrusion occurs in both shallower unconfined and deeper confined aquifers, and, in many places, the deeper aquifers are more vulnerable due to their isolation from local recharge and low storativity, making hydraulic heads sensitive to pumping. These insights provide a conceptual framework that demonstrates how seawater intrusion depends on climate, terrain and groundwater use, and imply that seawater intrusion assessments should include both shallow and deep aquifers (Fig. 1). A common theme among the local-scale studies is that the rates and spatial patterns of intruding seawater depend not only on hydraulic gradients but also on the heterogeneity and architecture of the coastal aquifer system (e.g., connectivity of sedimentary layers to the sea, presence of windows (i.e., gaps) in aquitards).

(ii) Because local-scale studies do not cover the whole coastline continuously (Fig. 1) the potential for seawater intrusion has not been systematically assessed along the nation’s coastline. In an attempt to fill this knowledge gap, hydrologic models have been used to estimate seawater intrusion along contiguous US coastlines10,11. Sawyer et al.11 simulate the catchment water balance to depths of ~30 m below the land surface and compare their model results against local-scale studies. In some areas, seawater intrusion is largely constrained to the uppermost ~30 m, making this a suitable depth to evaluate (e.g., Miami39,40; Fig. 1e). However, local-scale studies (Fig. 1) demonstrate the three-dimensional nature of seawater intrusion in layered aquifer systems, where hydraulic heads and the advance of seawater differ between shallower versus deeper aquifers, just as they may differ laterally at different locations along the coastline (e.g., the distance seawater has intruded inland differs between the 180-foot Aquifer and the 400-foot Aquifer in California’s Salinas Valley15,16,17; Fig. 1b). These studies demonstrate seawater intrusion into confined aquifers lying deeper than the ~30 m depth simulated by Sawyer et al.11 (e.g., the Atlantic City 800-foot Sand in Cape May35; Fig. 1g). Because current model-based assessments of submarine groundwater discharge and seawater intrusion focus mostly on shallow unconfined aquifers, we lack a continental-scale assessment of the potential for seawater intrusion at depths deeper than ~30 m. Further, some continental-scale coastal hydrogeologic models embed assumptions that cannot be straightforwardly evaluated, such as an assumed relationship between population density and groundwater pumping.

Here, we assess the potential for seawater intrusion at continental-scale, by collating and analyzing 250,000 groundwater well water observations made since the year 2000 within 10 km of the coast (Supplementary Note 1). The 1st–99th percentile range of well depths is 3–205 m, meaning our dataset samples both unconfined and confined aquifers. The unprecedented spatial resolution of our dataset, both laterally and vertically, allows for observation-based estimates of landward hydraulic gradients along the coastline of the lower 48 states of the US. Our results use observational data to generate locally relevant predictions using a consistent methodology in areas that have not been the focus of local-scale studies (for a detailed comparison with previous work see Supplementary Note 8). Most of our measurements are static water levels measured since 2000 that derive from drilling reports (i.e., measurements made before pumping); we show that these measurements agree with nearby monitoring well readings, implying that they provide reliable data on actual aquifer conditions (Supplementary Note 3). The density of our well observations and the wide range of aquifer depths make our approach uniquely suited to address the knowledge gaps outlined above. Our objective is to identify coastal areas where most well water elevations lie below sea level, rendering these areas potentially vulnerable to seawater intrusion.

Results and discussion

Observations reveal scope of potential seawater intrusion

Areas where most well water elevations lie below sea level—indicative of landward-directed hydraulic gradients—are found on all three coastlines (Fig. 2). Reported well water depths were converted to elevation above sea level using a ~10 m-gridded digital elevation dataset (available from ned.usgs.gov). For monitoring wells reporting more than one water level measurement, we include only the median of all measurements made from 2000–present in all results to follow. More than half of all recorded well water elevations that are below sea level in our compiled dataset are found within 8 km of the coast (Fig. 3a, b), and 70% are within ~20 km of the coast (Fig. 3b). Well water elevations that are below sea level and located more than 20 km inland are mainly found along the Gulf Coast and in areas where the land surface itself lies below sea level. Landward hydraulic gradients are more common along the Gulf (South) and Atlantic (East) Coasts relative to the Pacific (West) Coast (Fig. 4a–c), as discussed below. We report our results as percentages of wells exhibiting landward gradients within segments 20 km long (along the shore) and 10 km wide (extending inland). These segments allow us to report regional patterns of landward hydraulic gradients based on point observations (Table 1). Segments are characterized as exhibiting landward hydraulic gradients if more than half of their well water levels are lower than sea level. Where well water elevations are equal to or slightly above the sea level, hydraulic gradients may be seaward, or may still be landward because of the higher density of seawater (i.e., the equivalent hydraulic head resulting from the Ghijben–Herzberg principle). Furthermore, a small drop in water table elevations—which may still lie above sea level—can lead to substantial landward movements of seawater where topographic relief is minimal. As a result, our approach—detecting landward hydraulic gradients and interpreting these as precursors to seawater intrusion—is conservative. Seaward hydraulic gradients can occur even where most well water elevations lie below sea level, if a hydraulic ridge exists (e.g., if well water elevations lie below sea level 5–10 km inland, but are above sea level within 5 km of the coast). Therefore, we evaluate the sensitivity of our results to the distance from the coast (i.e., measurements within 10 km of the coast versus only those within 1 km of the coast; Supplementary Note 4), and we find that our main conclusions remain valid within this range of choices.

Fig. 2: Well water elevations across the contiguous United States.
figure2

Each point on the center map represents a unique well, and its color corresponds to the well water elevation measured more recently than January 1, 2000. Red points correspond to well water elevations that are more than one meter below sea level. For monitoring wells reporting more than one well water elevation measurement, we show the median of all measurements made after the year 2000. We only present data for wells located within 50 km of the coast. Well water elevations below mean sea level (i.e., red points) are concentrated in densely populated parts of California’s coast (Los Angeles), much of the west-central part of the Gulf (south) coast, and portions of the Atlantic Coast (e.g., western Delmarva Peninsula). Six 100 km by 100 km maps are shown for specific areas of each coastline (red-blue shades are interpolations of well water elevations; interpolated surfaces follow the same color scale as point data in continent-wide map).

Fig. 3: Fraction of well water elevations that are below sea level, as a function of distance from the coastline.
figure3

a Fraction of well water elevations below sea level, as a proportion of all recorded well levels at varying distances to the nearest coast. b Cumulative fraction of all well water elevations that are below sea level. More than half of all wells with water elevations that lie below sea level are within 10 km of the coast. Each well is counted only once; for wells with multiple measurements postdating 2000, we calculated median well water elevations for 2000–present and incorporate only this median value in our calculations to produce the above figures.

Fig. 4: The fraction of well water elevations that lie below sea level along contiguous US coasts.
figure4

The center map displays distances along each coast. Colors along the coastlines shown on the center map represent 20-km segments of coast, reaching 10 km inland; orange and blue segments represent those where more than half of the measured well levels are below and above sea level, respectively. The three bar plots present the fraction of well water elevations that are below sea level; each bar represents one 20-km coastline segment, reaching 10 km inland. The numbers on the map indicate the fractional distance along the coastline from south to north (panels a and c) or west to east (panel b), which can be followed in the corresponding bar plots. Selected coastal cities and regions where at least half the nearby well water elevations are below sea level are individually labeled. The inset map shows the location of the contiguous US (black outline). Because well water elevations that lie below sea level are more common closer to the coast (Fig. 3), we also reproduced Fig. 4 using three additional distance thresholds to assess their effects on our findings (see Supplementary Note 4, Supplementary Table 1, and Supplementary Figs. 68). Further, we also present alternate versions of Fig. 4 that separate shallower from deeper wells to test the sensitivity of our results to well depth (Supplementary Figs. 914).

Table 1 Well water elevations along west, gulf and east coasts.

Because some deeper wells tap confined aquifers, adjacent shallow and deep wells can yield different water elevations. We cannot identify depths at which aquifer systems transition from unconfined (shallow wells) to confined (deeper wells) conditions, because three-dimensional continent-wide geologic datasets are currently unavailable. Instead, we present a sensitivity analysis, based on re-running our analyses using only wells shallower than six different threshold depths (e.g., results based only on wells shallower than 100 m versus results based only on wells deeper than 100 m; Supplementary Note 4). In general, we find that well water elevations that lie below sea level are more common in deeper wells, but that the general spatial patterns of well water elevations in coastal aquifers (i.e., Figs. 2 and 3) hold across a wide range of threshold well depths (Supplementary Figs. 914 and Supplementary Table 2).

West Coast

About 15% of West Coast well water elevation observations within 10 km of the coast lie below sea level (Table 1; Fig. 2). Well water elevations that are below sea level are concentrated in densely populated or heavily irrigated parts of the coast, such as central and southern California (e.g., Monterey, Oxnard, Los Angeles). Among all studied 20-km coastline segments with sufficient data (see “Methods” section), 4.2% have over half of their well water elevation measurements below sea level (Fig. 4a). Landward hydraulic gradients characterize at least 2.4% of the US West Coast (Table 1). Because well locations are particularly uncertain in California, we conducted sensitivity analyses for the West Coast and found that at least half of well water elevations could lie below sea level for as many as 6.9% of all studied West Coast segments (Table 1; see Supplementary Note 6 and Supplementary Table 4).

Gulf Coast

Nearly one-quarter (22.6%) of Gulf Coast well levels within 10 km of the coast lie below sea level (Table 1; Fig. 2). At least half of all well water elevations are below sea level in 40.1% of studied coastline segments (Fig. 4b). At least half of all measured well water elevations are below sea level near Houston (Texas), New Orleans (Louisiana), Gulfport (Mississippi), Panama City, St. Petersburg, and Venice (northwest and west Florida). Seaward hydraulic gradients are common to most of northwestern Florida, whereas landward hydraulic gradients characterize much of the western portion of the Gulf Coast. Our analysis reveals substantial variability in hydraulic gradients from west to east along the Gulf Coast (Fig. 4b). We conclude that landward hydraulic gradients characterize at least 17.3% of the US Gulf Coast (Table 1).

East Coast

About one-third (34.7%) of East Coast well water elevations measured within 10 km of the coast are below sea level (Fig. 2). At least half of all measured well water elevations are below sea level for 38.8% of studied coastline segments (see “Methods” section; Fig. 4c). Areas where well water elevations are frequently below sea level include Miami (Florida), Savannah (Georgia), Myrtle Beach (South Carolina), Virginia Beach (Virginia), west-facing and east-facing shorelines of Chesapeake Bay (Maryland), and Somers Point (New Jersey; Fig. 4c). Conversely, most well water elevations are above sea level along north Chesapeake Bay shorelines and along most of the coastlines of New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts and New Hampshire (Fig. 4c). Landward hydraulic gradients characterize at least 18.4% of the US East Coast (Table 1).

Seawater intrusion threatens American aquifers

Well water elevations suggest that many coastal aquifers are threatened by seawater intrusion arising from landward hydraulic gradients (Fig. 2). We find that landward hydraulic gradients are common along at least 15% of the contiguous United States coastline, are more common along the Gulf and East Coasts than along the West Coast (Fig. 4), and exhibit high spatial variability along all coasts. Hydraulic gradients conducive to seawater intrusion are common to several major US population centers such as Houston and Los Angeles (Figs. 2 and 4). We emphasize that well waters can become salinized via seawater intrusion long before landward hydraulic gradients emerge, wherever pumping has directly drawn saline water upward from deeper parts of a coastal aquifer.

Landward hydraulic gradients threaten coastal groundwater use

The main finding of our research is that US coastal aquifers—relied on by many large population centers and agricultural areas—are extensively threatened by seawater intrusion. Landward hydraulic gradients exist along at least 15% of the US coastline, and many of these areas encompass urban centers where fresh groundwater is critical for household uses (Figs. 24). Such landward gradients imply that the potential for seawater intrusion exists, but the gradients by themselves do not demonstrate that seawater intrusion is occurring. Many factors beyond just hydraulic gradients control the likelihood of seawater intrusion. These factors include aquifer types (unconfined, partially confined, confined), hydraulic conductivities, aquifer and aquitard thicknesses, and recharge rates (see refs. 41,42).

Seawater intrusion can occur even where groundwater levels lie above sea level, as depths to coastal freshwater–saltwater interfaces can be <~100 m, where well water elevations are 1–3 m above sea level and groundwater pumping induces an upwelling of saltwater from these deeper depths (e.g., see ref. 43). Further, heterogeneity in aquifer flow paths and connectivity to surface processes mean that hydraulic heads may switch from below to above sea level over short lateral distances along coastlines (~kilometers); thus, even in sections of coastline where the great majority of well water elevations lie below sea level, not all wells are necessarily vulnerable to seawater intrusion. Influences from relict climate conditions and past local sea level rise may mean that pre-development fresh–saline groundwater interfaces had not yet reached equilibrium44, implying seawater intrusion was occurring in some places even before the installation of the first US water well in the early 1800s44.

We highlight that our analysis assumes that most well water elevation measurements are made in wells filled with freshwater. This assumption is relevant because differences in fluid density can influence hydraulic heads (see ref. 45). Most of our well water elevation measurements originate from groundwater well completion reports, many of which are linked to beneficial uses of fresh groundwater; therefore, the recorded well levels likely reflect conditions in aquifers that bore fresh water at the time of well construction. Our results indicate where seawater intrusion may have already occurred, or may occur in the future because landward hydraulic gradients exist.

We also stress that seawater intrusion is just one of several processes that lead to groundwater salinization. Others include dissolution of evaporite minerals46 (e.g., halite, gypsum), mixing with naturally occurring brines47, infiltration of seawater reaching the land surface by storm surges or tsunamis48,49,50,51, mixing with seawaters emplaced during marine high-stands52 (i.e., when local sea levels were higher than present), infiltration of salts derived from dry and wet deposition of airborne particles53, percolation beneath tidal marshes40, and groundwater recharge impacted by surface activities (e.g., urban road salting, agricultural practices; refs. 5,54). Pumpage can also induce salinization via upconing, where deep saline waters upwell as a result of pumping from shallower aquifers (see research26 on the upwelling of saline waters from the Fernandina Permeable Zone into the Floridan Aquifer near Brunswick, Georgia).

Strategies to manage and monitor seawater intrusion

Approaches to managing and observing seawater intrusion fall into three broad categories: (i) regulation, (ii) monitoring, and (iii) engineering.

(i) Overpumping of aquifers is a leading driver of seawater intrusion in many areas. Limiting groundwater pumping via regulatory mechanisms can help groundwater levels stabilize or rebound where they have dropped below sea level, potentially slowing or stopping seawater intrusion. For example, in Monterey County, local agencies have the power to regulate groundwater extraction to prevent seawater intrusion (Monterey County Water Resources Agency Act § 52-22; ref. 55). In California more broadly, landward gradients are concentrated in densely populated and irrigated areas. Under California’s 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, Groundwater Sustainability Agencies across the state must consider seawater intrusion as they develop their plans for managing and using groundwater (e.g., ref. 15). Nevertheless, such regulatory mechanisms may be most useful for preventative management: once an aquifer is contaminated it could take decades to flush out salts or reverse intrusion fully, due to the long timespans required to completely flush intruded seawater from an aquifer. In these cases, engineered controls may be required to ameliorate salinization (see (iii) below).

(ii) Groundwater level and groundwater quality monitoring is important in many coastal areas. Nevertheless, few states mandate metering, monitoring, and reporting information associated with groundwater use56. Establishing, continuing, or augmenting monitoring activities can help to quantify the extent and pace of seawater intrusion or provide vital information about impending intrusion. Monitoring also can be used alongside engineering solutions to assess progress (e.g., injection wells to keep seawater at bay—see West Coast Basin19, Fig. 1b). Although our analysis represents the most extensive observation-based assessment of coastal hydraulic gradients to date, further monitoring is warranted in many areas where data remain scarce. We evaluated well water elevation variations in coastal monitoring wells across the US, and show that these monitoring well records are valuable for identifying coastal aquifers where (i) landward hydraulic gradients currently exist, but well water elevations are increasing over time (e.g., northwestern shores of Galveston Bay; landward gradient shown in Fig. 2; shallowing well water elevation trend shown in Supplementary Fig. 20); (ii) landward gradients currently exist and well water elevations are decreasing with time (e.g., western shores of Chesapeake Bay; landward gradient shown in Fig. 2; deepening well water elevation trend shown in Supplementary Fig. 20), and (iii) most well water elevations are above sea level, but well water elevations are declining, implying a landward gradient may arise if levels continue to decline (e.g., Santa Barbara, California; seaward gradient shown in Fig. 2; deepening well water elevation trend shown in Supplementary Fig. 20).

(iii) Controlling hydraulic gradients via engineering can slow seawater intrusion or help reverse landward hydraulic gradients. One engineering approach involves injecting freshwater into wells to create localized hydraulic barriers, reversing landward hydraulic gradients back to natural seaward hydraulic gradients. For example, in the Los Angeles Basin, three lines of injection wells have been constructed, successfully slowing seawater intrusion in some portions of the aquifer system18. Actively inducing recharge in carefully selected areas via spreading basins can also help create hydraulic barriers that slow seawater intrusion. Desalination and water recycling technologies can reduce water demands, and therefore help slow seawater intrusion by reducing demands for groundwater. Extracting and desalinating seawater for managed aquifer recharge has also been proposed to limit seawater intrusion57. In parts of California, excess surface water, stormwater, and wastewater are used for managed aquifer recharge projects with the intention of creating a barrier to seawater intrusion58. While these approaches may prove suitable in densely populated areas with capital to invest in infrastructure, they are unlikely to be feasible solutions for the whole ~5000 km of US coastline affected by landward hydraulic gradients (Fig. 4).

Potential for seawater intrusion along much of the coast

Expanding access to secure sustainable fresh water supplies remains a great challenge of the 21st century. Groundwater resources are often viewed as being more resilient to climate variability than surface water supplies59,60, and are already used widely. We show that well water measurements reported in well completion reports frequently provide high-density and high-quality hydraulic gradient information (Supplementary Notes 2 and 3). Analyzing coastal well water elevation data can help to identify coastal aquifers that are vulnerable to seawater intrusion, and also to improve assessments of coastal groundwater discharges and concomitant marine solute influxes. For this study, we define aquifers as particularly vulnerable to seawater intrusion if most coastal well water elevations lie below sea level. We re-emphasize that seawater intrusion can occur even where most well water elevations lie above sea level, meaning our main finding—that 15% of US coastlines are characterized by landward hydraulic gradients—probably underestimates the prevalence of vulnerability to seawater intrusion.

Our analyses of landward hydraulic gradients highlight that larger proportions of the United States’ tectonically passive continental margins—i.e., the East and Gulf Coasts—are affected relative to the West Coast. Even where most or all well water elevations lie below sea level, it may take decades for seawater to move kilometers inland, as the hydraulic conductivity of aquifers limits groundwater flow speeds. Thus, if vulnerable aquifers can be identified in time, the worst impacts of seawater intrusion can potentially be avoided. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to analyze densely distributed continental-scale well water elevation observations, allowing us to develop a measurement-driven national assessment of vulnerability to seawater intrusion. Active monitoring and new regulatory or engineering interventions in vulnerable locations can potentially slow or stop seawater intrusion and protect coastal groundwater quality.

Methods

Data synthesis

We compiled well water measurements from two types of data sources: (i) well water measurements recorded in well completion reports61, digitized and provided by state or regional water agencies (herein constructed wells; Supplementary Note 1), and (ii) monitoring well records maintained by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) or the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program (GAMA) of California’s State Water Resources Control Board (herein monitoring wells).

Results presented in the main text focus mostly on well water elevations measured near the coast. To evaluate the quality of water levels reported in well completion reports (see the next subsection and Supplementary Note 3), we also compiled well water elevation data for the non-coastal contiguous United States, Alaska, and Hawaii.

Quality assurance of water levels in well completion reports

Before analyzing well water level measurements in well completion reports, we assessed how they compared to well water level measurements made under similar hydrogeologic conditions in nearby monitoring wells (Supplementary Note 3). Specifically, we compared water level measurements reported in well completion reports versus those reported by USGS or GAMA databases where the constructed and monitoring well water level measurements met all of the following criteria: (i) the monitoring well and the constructed well were co-located (within one mile (1.61 km) of one another), (ii) the monitoring well and the constructed well were completed at locations with land surface elevations within ±1 m of one another, (iii) the monitoring well and the constructed well were completed to depths within ±1 m of one another, and (iv) the well construction date and the monitoring well water level measurement were separated by no more than 30 days.

Constructed well water level measurements made by well construction companies are, in many (but not all) cases, similar to nearby monitoring well water level measurements by trained technicians or pressure transducers made at similar times, in wells of similar depths (Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). Our comparison implies that water levels reported in well completion reports capture well water level information that is similar to monitoring well water level information. We acknowledge well water elevation data from both monitoring wells and constructed wells have substantial limitations (see ref. 62).

Geospatial analyses

We compared the elevation of water surfaces measured in wells to mean sea level. Uncertainties in our data derive from the land surface elevation dataset63 (~10 m gridded digital elevation model) and from uncertainties in the locations of groundwater wells. We then calculated the percentage of wells within 10 km of a coast with post-2000 well water elevations that lie below sea level, and report these results in Fig. 4. We completed a suite of sensitivity analyses to demonstrate limits to our analyses arising from (i) the threshold distance from the coast considered in our analysis (Supplementary Note 4), (ii) the presence of non-zero vertical hydraulic gradients and concomitant impacts of well depth on well water elevations (Supplementary Note 4), and (iii) imperfect well location information and resulting increases in well water elevation uncertainties (Supplementary Note 6; for further discussion of limitations arising due to uncertainties in well locations see refs. 61,64).

We emphasize that our dataset is biased toward places where groundwater wells have been drilled to provide fresh water, because most of our data originate from well completion reports61. Thus, the coastal segments that we analyze (i.e., those with at least n = 10 well water elevation measurements) capture parts of the coastline where groundwater use is common and where records of groundwater well construction are maintained. Several states do not have publicly available well construction databases, including Georgia, Connecticut, and Rhode Island61. Further, imprecise latitude–longitude data in California64 also hinder our analyses; California wellhead location uncertainty translates to uncertain groundwater level elevations (Supplementary Note 6). Establishing more complete groundwater monitoring and providing more precise well latitude and longitude data (e.g., in California) would enable better assessments of seawater intrusion in these areas.

Data availability

Well water level datasets are available from state and sub-state agencies. Some states require consent to share groundwater-well data, either through requests to their various agencies, or through public records requests. Supplementary Note 1 includes websites for direct download and contact information for requesting access to the original well completion report data (see also ref. 61). Monitoring well water level data are available from the US Geological Survey (waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/inventory) and California’s GAMA Program (gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public).

References

  1. 1.

    Werner, A. D. et al. Seawater intrusion processes, investigation and management: recent advances and future challenges. Adv. Water Resour. 51, 3–26 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Michael, H. A., Post, V. E., Wilson, A. M. & Werner, A. D. Science, society, and the coastal groundwater squeeze. Water Resour. Res. 53, 2610–2617 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    U.S. Census Bureau. Coastline Population Trends in the United States: 1960 to 2008. https://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/p25-1139.pdf (2010). Accessed 11 July 2019.

  4. 4.

    Bear, J. et al. (eds) Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers: Concepts, Methods and Practices, Vol. 14 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1999).

  5. 5.

    Foster, S. S. D. & Chilton, P. J. Groundwater: the processes and global significance of aquifer degradation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 358, 1957–1972 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Strack, O. D. L. A single‐potential solution for regional interface problems in coastal aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 12, 1165–117 (1976).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Koussis, A. D., Mazi, K., Riou, F. & Destouni, G. A correction for Dupuit–Forchheimer interface flow models of seawater intrusion in unconfined coastal aquifers. J. Hydrol. 525, 277–285 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lu, C., Xin, P., Kong, J., Li, L. & Luo, J. Analytical solutions of seawater intrusion in sloping confined and unconfined coastal aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 52, 6989–7004 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Barlow, P. M. & Reichard, E. G. Saltwater intrusion in coastal regions of North America. Hydrogeol. J. 18, 247–260 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ferguson, G. & Gleeson, T. Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to groundwater use and climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 342–345 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sawyer, A. H., David, C. H. & Famiglietti, J. S. Continental patterns of submarine groundwater discharge reveal coastal vulnerabilities. Science 353, 705–707 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Vaccaro, J. J., Hansen, A. J. & Jones, M. A. Hydrogeologic Framework of the Puget Sound Aquifer System, Washington and British Columbia. US Geological Survey Professional Report 1424-D. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1424d/report.pdf (1998).

  13. 13.

    Jones, M. A. Geologic Framework of the Puget Sound Aquifer System, Washington and British Columbia. US Geological Survey Professional Report 1424-C. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp1424C (1999).

  14. 14.

    Paulson, A. J. et al. Freshwater and Saline Loads of Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen to Hood Canal and Lynch Cove, Western Washington. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5106. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5106/ (2006).

  15. 15.

    Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency and Montgomery and Associates. Salinas Valley: Valley-Wide Integrated Groundwater Sustainability Plan. 1947 pp. https://svbgsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/SVBGSA-Combined-GSP-2020-0123-optimized.pdf (2020).

  16. 16.

    Monterey County Resource Management Agency and Brown and Caldwell. State of the Salinas River Groundwater Basin. 240 pp. https://www.co.monterey.ca.us/home/showdocument?id=19586 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Monterey County Water Resources Agency. Monterey County Groundwater Management Plan, 78 pp. https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/groundwater/docs/GWMP/CC-3_MontereyCoWRA_GWMP_2006.pdf (2006).

  18. 18.

    Edwards, B. D. & Evans, K. R. Saltwater Intrusion in Los Angeles Area Coastal Aquifers—the Marine Connection. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 030-02. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/old.2002/fs030-02/ (2002).

  19. 19.

    Land, M. et al. Ground-water Quality of Coastal Aquifer Systems in the West Coast Basin, Los Angeles County, California, 1999–2002. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5067, 88 pp. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2004/5067/sir2004-5067.pdf (2004).

  20. 20.

    Murgulet, D. & Tick, G. The extent of saltwater intrusion in southern Baldwin County, Alabama. Environ. Geol. 55, 1235–1245 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Braun, C. L., Ramage, J. K. & Shah, S. D. Status of Groundwater-level Altitudes and Long-term Groundwater-level Changes in the Chicot, Evangeline, and Jasper Aquifers, Houston-Galveston Region, Texas, 2019. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2019-5089, 18 pp. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20195089 (2019).

  22. 22.

    Borrok, D. M. & Broussard, W. P. III Long-term geochemical evaluation of the coastal Chicot aquifer system, Louisiana, USA. J. Hydrol. 533, 320–331 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Prakken, L. B. Groundwater Resources in the New Orleans Area 2008. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Report. Water Resources Technical Report No. 80 (2009).

  24. 24.

    Cushing, E. M., Kantrowitz, I. H. & Taylor, K. R. Water resources of the Delmarva Peninsula. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 822, 58 pp. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0822/report.pdf (1973).

  25. 25.

    Bush, P. W. & Johnston, R. H. Ground-water hydraulics, regional flow, and ground-water development of the Floridan aquifer system in Florida and in parts of Georgia (pp. 80. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1403-C, South Carolina, and Alabama. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1403c/report.pdf (1988).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cherry, G. S. & Peck, M. F. Saltwater intrusion in the Floridan aquifer system near downtown Brunswick, Georgia, 1957–2015. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File. Report 2017-2010, 10 pp. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171010 (2017).

  27. 27.

    Foyle, A. M., Henry, V. J. & Alexander, C. R. Mapping the threat of seawater intrusion in a regional coastal aquifer–aquitard system in the southeastern United States. Environ. Geol. 43, 151–159 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Smith, B. S. & Harlow Jr, G. E. Conceptual hydrogeologic framework of the shallow aquifer system at Virginia Beach, Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4262 37 pp. https://va.water.usgs.gov/online_pubs/WRIR/01-4262/01-4262.pdf (2002).

  29. 29.

    Aucott, W. R. (1996). Hydrology of the Southeastern Coastal Plain aquifer system in South Carolina and parts of Georgia and North Carolina. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1410-E, 83 pp. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1410e/report.pdf (1996).

  30. 30.

    Knobel, L. L., Chapelle, F. H., & Meisler, H. Geochemistry of the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain Aquifer System. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1404-L, 57 pp. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1404l/report.pdf (1998).

  31. 31.

    Chapelle, F. H. Hydrogeology, Digital Solute-transport Simulation, and Geochemistry of the Lower Cretaceous Aquifer System near Baltimore, Maryland, with a Section on Well Records, Pumpage Information and Other Supplemental Data by T.M. Kean. Maryland Geological Survey Report of Investigations 43, 120 pp. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70114204 (1985).

  32. 32.

    Fairchild, R. W. & Bentley, C. B. Saline-water intrusion in the Floridan aquifer in the Fernandina Beach area, Nassau County, Florida: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 77-32, 27 pp. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wri7732 (1977).

  33. 33.

    Cauller, S. J., Carleton, G. B. & Storck, M. J. Hydrogeology of, water withdrawal from, and water levels and chloride concentrations in the major Coastal Plain aquifers of Gloucester and Salem Counties, New Jersey: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4136, 123 pp. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri98-4136/ (1999).

  34. 34.

    Ervin, E. M. Voronin, L. M. & Fusillo, T. V. Water quality of the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy aquifer system in the coastal plain, west-central New Jersey: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4113, 114 pp. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wri944113 (1994).

  35. 35.

    Lacombe, P. J., & Carleton, G. B. Hydrogeologic framework, availability of water supplies, and saltwater intrusion, Cape May County, New Jersey (No. 1). Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4246 U.S. Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wri/wri014246/ (2002).

  36. 36.

    McAuley, S. D., Barringer, J. L., Paulachok, G. N., Clark, J. S., & Zapecza, O. S. Groundwater flow and quality in the Atlantic City 800 Foot Sand, New Jersey. New Jersey Geological Survey Geological Survey Report GSR 41, 94 pp. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70114185 (2001).

  37. 37.

    Navoy, A. S., Voronin, L. M., & Modica, E. Vulnerability of Production Wells in the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy Aquifer System to Saltwater Intrusion from the Delaware River in Camden, Gloucester, and Salem Counties, New Jersey. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5096, 43 pp. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20045096 (2005).

  38. 38.

    Pucci Jr, A. A., Pope, D. A., & Gronberg, J. M. Hydrogeology, Simulation of Regional Ground-water Flow, and Saltwater Intrusion, Potomac-Raritan-Magothy Aquifer System, Northern Coastal Plain of New Jersey. New Jersey Geological Survey Report GSR36. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70159214 (1994).

  39. 39.

    Renken, R. A. et al. Impact of Anthropogenic Development on Coastal Ground-water Hydrology in Southeastern Florida, 1900–2000. U. S. Geol. Surv. Circular 1275, 87 pp. https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2005/circ1275/pdf/cir1275.pdf (2005).

  40. 40.

    Prinos, S. T., Wacker, M. A., Cunningham, K. J., & Fitterman, D. V. Origins and Delineation of Saltwater Intrusion in the Biscayne Aquifer and Changes in the Distribution of Saltwater in Miami-Dade County, Florida. U.S. Geological Survey Report No. 2014-5025, 116 pp. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20145025 (2014).

  41. 41.

    Barlow, P. M. Ground Water in Freshwater–saltwater Environments of the Atlantic Coast. United States Geological Survey Circular 1262 (2003).

  42. 42.

    Werner, A. D. et al. Vulnerability indicators of sea water intrusion. Groundwater 50, 48–58 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jakovovic, D., Werner, A. D., de Louw, P. G., Post, V. E. & Morgan, L. K. Saltwater upconing zone of influence. Adv. Water Resour. 94, 75–86 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Konikow, L., Reilly, T. Seawater intrusion in the United States. In Seawater Intrusion in Coastal Aquifers—Concepts, Methods and Practices (eds Bear, J., Cheng, A.-H. D., Sorek, S., Ouazar, D. & Herrera, I.) 463–506 (Springer, 1999).

  45. 45.

    Post, V., Kooi, H. & Simmons, C. Using hydraulic head measurements in variable‐density ground water flow analyses. Groundwater 45, 664–671 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Li, P., Qian, H., Wu, J., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, H. Major ion chemistry of shallow groundwater in the Dongsheng Coalfield, Ordos Basin, China. Mine Water Environ. 32, 195–206 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Han, D. M., Song, X. F., Currell, M. J., Yang, J. L. & Xiao, G. Q. Chemical and isotopic constraints on evolution of groundwater salinization in the coastal plain aquifer of Laizhou Bay, China. J. Hydrol. 508, 12–27 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hynes, V. M. Salt content of wells in Massachusetts affected by the tidal wave and hurricane of 1938. J. N. Engl. Water Works 56, 355–360 (1942).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Violette, S., Boulicot, G. & Gorelick, S. M. Tsunami-induced groundwater salinization in southeastern India. CR Geosci. 341, 339–346 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cardenas, M. B. et al. Devastation of aquifers from tsunami‐like storm surge by Supertyphoon Haiyan. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 2844–2851 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Villholth, K. G. et al. Tsunami impacts and rehabilitation of groundwater supply: lessons learned from eastern Sri Lanka. In Natural and Anthropogenic Disasters (ed. Jha, M. K.) 82–99 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2010).

  52. 52.

    Lee, S., Currell, M. & Cendón, D. I. Marine water from mid-Holocene sea level highstand trapped in a coastal aquifer: evidence from groundwater isotopes, and environmental significance. Sci. Tot. Environ. 544, 995–1007 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Herczeg, A. L., Dogramaci, S. S. & Leaney, F. W. J. Origin of dissolved salts in a large, semi-arid groundwater system: Murray Basin, Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 52, 41–52 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hansen, J. A., Jurgens, B. C. & Fram, M. S. Quantifying anthropogenic contributions to century-scale groundwater salinity changes, San Joaquin Valley, California, USA. Sci. Tot. Environ. 642, 125–136 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Monterey County Water Resources Agency Act, Chapter 52, Section § 52-22. https://www.co.monterey.ca.us/Home/ShowDocument?id=19488. Accessed 1 September 2019.

  56. 56.

    Nelson, R. L. & Perrone, D. Local groundwater withdrawal permitting laws in the south‐western US: California in comparative context. Groundwater 54, 747–753 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Abd-Elhamid, H. F. & Javadi, A. A. A cost-effective method to control seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers. Water Resour. Manag. 25, 2755–2780 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Perrone, D. & Rohde, M. Benefits and economic costs of managed aquifer recharge in California. San. Franc. Estuary Watershed Sci. 14, 1–13 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Taylor, R. G. Ground water and climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 322–329 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Cuthbert, M. O. et al. Observed controls on resilience of groundwater to climate variability in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature 572, 230–234 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Perrone, D. & Jasechko, S. Deeper well drilling an unsustainable stopgap to groundwater depletion. Nat. Sustainabil. 2, 773–782 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Rau, G. C. et al. Error in hydraulic head and gradient time-series measurements: a quantitative appraisal. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 23, 3603–3629 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    National Elevation Dataset (NED). ned.usgs.gov.

  64. 64.

    Jasechko, S. & Perrone, D. California's Central Valley Groundwater Wells Run Dry During Recent Drought. Earth’s Future e2019EF001339. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001339 (2020).

  65. 65.

    Santos, I. R., Eyre, B. D. & Huettel, M. The driving forces of porewater and groundwater flow in permeable coastal sediments: a review. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 98, 1–15 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    McCoy, C. A. & Corbett, D. R. Review of submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) in coastal zones of the Southeast and Gulf Coast regions of the United States with management implications. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 644–651 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sawyer, A. H., Michael, H. A. & Schroth, A. W. From soil to sea: the role of groundwater in coastal critical zone processes. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 3, 706–726 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Lecher, A. & Mackey, K. Synthesizing the effects of submarine groundwater discharge on marine biota. Hydrology 5, 60 (2018).

  69. 69.

    Taniguchi, M., Burnett, W. C., Cable, J. E. & Turner, J. V. Investigation of submarine groundwater discharge. Hydrol. Process. 16, 2115–2129 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.J., D.P., H.S., Y.F., and J.W.K. devised methods, discussed results, and contributed to writing the manuscript; S.J. and D.P. compiled well completion records; S.J., D.P., and H.S. completed geospatial analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Jasechko.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Andrew Fisher, C. Lu and Audrey Sawyer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jasechko, S., Perrone, D., Seybold, H. et al. Groundwater level observations in 250,000 coastal US wells reveal scope of potential seawater intrusion. Nat Commun 11, 3229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17038-2

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing