Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Petermann-factor sensitivity limit near an exceptional point in a Brillouin ring laser gyroscope

## Abstract

Exceptional points are singularities of open systems, and among their many remarkable properties, they provide a way to enhance the responsivity of sensors. Here we show that the improved responsivity of a laser gyroscope caused by operation near an exceptional point is precisely compensated by increasing laser noise. The noise, of fundamental origin, is enhanced because the laser mode spectrum loses the oft-assumed property of orthogonality. This occurs as system eigenvectors coalesce near the exceptional point and a bi-orthogonal analysis confirms experimental observations. While the results do not preclude other possible advantages of the exceptional-point-enhanced responsivity, they do show that the fundamental sensitivity limit of the gyroscope is not improved through this form of operation. Besides being important to the physics of microcavities and non-Hermitian photonics, these results help clarify fundamental sensitivity limits in a specific class of exceptional-point sensor.

## Introduction

Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians1,2 describing open systems can feature singularities called exceptional points (EPs)3,4,5. EPs have been experimentally realized in several systems6,7,8 and applied to demonstrate non-reciprocal transmission9,10,11 and lasing dynamics control12,13,14,15. Moreover, resonant frequencies become strongly dependent on externally applied perturbations near an EP, which has given rise to the concept of EP-enhanced sensing in photonics16,17,18,19 and electronics20,21. While increased sensor responsivity has been demonstrated in several systems22,23,24,25, signal-to-noise performance (sensitivity) has been considered only theoretically26,27,28,29,30.

Recently, strong responsivity improvement near an EP was reported in a Brillouin ring laser gyroscope by monitoring an increase in the gyroscope scale factor (i.e., transduction factor of rotation-rate into a signal)24. At the same time, however, measurement of the gyroscope Allan deviation versus averaging time showed that short-term laser frequency noise also increased near the EP. This noise was random-walk in nature, suggesting a fundamental origin. Moreover, it depended upon system bias relative to the EP in such a way so as to precisely compensate for the observed EP-enhanced transduction. As a result, the gyroscope’s angular random walk, the metric used to quantify short-term rotation sensitivity, was observed to maintain a constant value (i.e., independent of gyroscope bias relative to the EP). In effect, the measurements showed that gyroscope sensitivity (i.e., weakest rotation signal measurable at a given detection bandwidth) is not improved by operation near the EP even while the gyroscope responsiveness through improved transduction (scale factor) increases.

As with all laser gyroscopes, the Brillouin ring laser gyroscope measures rotations through the Sagnac effect31. Clockwise (cw) and counter-clockwise (ccw) lasing waves experience opposing frequency shifts when the plane of the gyroscope rotates. By mixing the two laser fields on a detector, their difference frequency therefore reveals the rotation-induced frequency shift added onto a constant bias frequency (which is at audio rates in this case24). Frequency noise in the beat frequency therefore determines the measurement sensitivity. This noise has both a technical component (observable on longer time scales in the Allan deviation24) as well as a random walk component that, absent the EP, is known to result from fundamental linewidth broadening of the Brillouin laser waves32,33. Significantly, subsequent measurement of the random walk component showed that none of the parameters which normally impact its magnitude (e.g., laser power, cavity Q factor) varied near the EP, therefore suggesting that frequency noise (and linewidth) is increased by way of another mechanism.

Laser linewidth can also be broadened by the Petermann factor34,35,36,37,38,39. This mechanism is associated with non-orthogonality of a mode spectrum, and its connection to EPs has been considered in theoretical studies of microresonators40,41. However, despite continued theoretical interest42,43, including the development of new techniques for determination of linewidth in general laser systems44, the observation of Petermann linewidth broadening near exceptional points was reported only recently by the Yang group in a phonon laser system45, and the link between Petermann-factor-induced noise and EP sensor performance is unexplored.

Here, it is shown that mode non-orthogonality induced by the EP limits the gyroscope sensitivity via Petermann-factor linewidth broadening. Indeed, analysis and measurement confirm near-perfect cancellation of the signal transduction improvement by increasing Petermann-factor noise, so that the gyroscope’s fundamental signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and hence sensitivity is not improved by operation near the EP. These results are further confirmed using an Adler phase locking equation approach46,47, which is also applied to analyze the combined effect of dissipative and conservative coupling on the system.

## Results

### Biorthogonal noise enhancement theory

The gyroscope uses a high-Q silica whispering gallery resonator48 in a ring-laser configuration32. As illustrated in Fig. 1a, optical pumping of cw and ccw directions on the same whispering-gallery mode index induces laser action through the Brillouin process. On account of the Brillouin phase matching condition, these stimulated Brillouin laser (SBL) waves propagate in a direction opposite to their corresponding pump waves33. Dissipative backscattering49 couples the SBLs and the following Hamiltonian governs the above-laser-threshold motion24:

$$H=\left(\begin{array}{cc}{\omega }_{{\rm{cw}}}&i \Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}/2\\ i\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}/2&{\omega }_{{\rm{ccw}}}\end{array}\right)$$
(1)

where $$H$$ describes the dynamics via $$id\Psi/dt=H\Psi$$ and $$\Psi={\left({a}_{{\rm{cw}}},{a}_{{\rm{ccw}}}\right)}^{T}$$ is the column vector of SBL mode amplitudes (square of norm is photon number). Also, $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}$$ is a non-Hermitian term related to the coupling rate between the two SBL modes and $${\omega }_{{\rm{cw}}}$$ ($${\omega }_{{\rm{ccw}}}$$) is the active-cavity resonance angular frequency of the cw (ccw) SBL mode above laser threshold. The dependence of $${\omega }_{{\rm{cw}}}$$, $${\omega }_{{\rm{ccw}}}$$, and $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}$$ on other system parameters, most notably the angular rotation rate and the optical pumping frequencies, has been suppressed for clarity.

A class of EP sensors operates by measuring the frequency difference of the two system eigenmodes. This difference is readily calculated from Eq. (1) as $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{S}}}=\sqrt{\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}^{2}-\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}^{2}}$$ where $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}\equiv {\omega }_{{\rm{ccw}}}-{\omega }_{{\rm{cw}}}$$ is the resonance frequency difference and $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}$$ is the critical value of $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}$$ at which the system is biased at the EP. As illustrated in Fig. 1b, c the vector composition of the SBL modes strongly depends upon the system proximity to the EP. For $$| \Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}| \gg \Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}$$ the SBL modes (unit vectors) are orthogonal cw and ccw waves. However, closer to the EP the waves become admixtures of these states that are no longer orthogonal. At the EP, the two waves coalesce to a single state vector (a standing wave in the whispering gallery). Rotation of the gyroscope in state II in Fig. 1 $$\left(\left|\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}\right|\;> \;\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}\right)$$ introduces a perturbation to $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}$$ whose transduction into $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{S}}}$$ is enhanced relative to the conventional Sagnac factor31. This EP-induced signal-enhancement-factor (SEF) is given by24,

$${\rm{SEF}}={\left|\frac{\partial \Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{S}}}}{\partial \Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}}\right|}^{2}=\frac{\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}^{2}}{\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}^{2}-\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}^{2}}$$
(2)

where SEF refers to the signal power (not amplitude) enhancement. This factor has recently been verified in the Brillouin ring laser gyroscope24. The control of $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}$$ (and in turn $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{S}}}$$) in that work and here is possible by tuning of the optical pumping frequencies and is introduced later.

$$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{S}}}$$ is measured as the beat frequency of the SBL laser signals upon photodetection and the SNR is set by the laser linewidth. To understand the linewidth behavior a bi-orthogonal basis is used as described in Supplementary Notes 1 and 3. As shown there and illustrated in Fig. 1d, the peculiar properties of non-orthogonal systems near the EP cause the unit vectors (optical modes) to be lengthened. This lengthening results in an effectively shorter laser field amplitude. Also, noise into the mode is increased as illustrated in Fig. 1e. Because the laser linewidth can be understood to result from diffusion of the phasor in Fig. 1e, linewidth increases upon operation close to the EP. And the linewidth enhancement is given by the Petermann factor (see Supplementary Note 2),

$${\rm{PF}}=\frac{1}{2}\left(1+\frac{{\rm{Tr}}({H}_{0}^{{\rm{\dagger }}}{H}_{0})}{| {\rm{Tr}}({H}_{0}^{2})| }\right)=\frac{\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}^{2}}{\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}^{2}-\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}^{2}}$$
(3)

where $${\rm{Tr}}$$ is the matrix trace operation and $${H}_{0}=H-{\rm{Tr}}(H)/2$$ is the traceless part of $$H$$. As derived in Supplementary Note 2, the first part of this equation is a basis independent form and is valid for a general two-dimensional system. The second part is specific to the current SBL system. Inspection of Eqs. (2) and (3) shows that SEF = PF. As a result the SNR is not expected to improve through operation near the EP when the system is fundamental-noise limited.

### Petermann noise measurement

To verify the above predictions, the output of a single pump laser (~1553.3 nm) is divided into two branches that are coupled into cw and ccw directions of the resonator using a tapered fiber50,51. Both pump powers are actively stabilized. The resonator is mounted in a sealed box and a thermo-electric cooler (TEC) controls the chip temperature which is monitored using a thermistor (fluctuations are held within 5 mK). Each pumping branch has its frequency controlled using acousto-optic modulators (AOMs). SBL power is also monitored and controlled so that fluctuations are within 0.6%. Even with the control of temperature and power, the Allan deviation at longer gate times reflects technical-noise drifting that is observed to be more pronounced for operation near the EP. As described in ref. 24, the ccw pump laser frequency is Pound-Drever-Hall (PDH) locked to one resonator mode and the cw pump laser can then be independently tuned by the AOM. This pump detuning frequency ($$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{P}}}$$) is therefore controlled to radio-frequency precision. It is used to precisely adjust $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}$$ and in turn $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{S}}}$$ as shown in three sets of measurements in Fig. 2a. Here, the photodetected SBL beat frequency $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{S}}}$$ is measured using a frequency counter. The data sets are taken for three distinct SBL output amplitude ratios as discussed further below. A solid curve fitting is also presented using $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{S}}}=\pm \!\sqrt{\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}^{2}-\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}^{2}}$$, where $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}=\frac{\gamma /{\rm{\Gamma }}}{1+\gamma /{\rm{\Gamma }}}\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{P}}}+\frac{1}{1+\gamma /{\rm{\Gamma }}}\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{Kerr}}}$$ (see Supplementary Note 4). Also, $$\gamma$$ is the photon decay rate, $${\rm{\Gamma }}$$ is the Brillouin gain bandwidth33, and $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{Kerr}}}$$ is a Kerr effect correction that is explained below. As an aside, the data plot and theory show a frequency locking zone, the boundaries of which occur at the EP.

The frequency counter data are also analyzed as an Allan deviation (Adev) measurement (Fig. 2a inset). The initial roll-off of the Adev features a slope of $$-1$$/2 corresponding to white frequency noise52. This was also verified in separate measurements of the beat frequency using both an electrical spectrum analyzer and a fast Fourier transform. The slope of this region is fit to $$\sqrt{{S}_{\nu }/(2\tau )}$$ where $${S}_{\nu }$$ is the one-sided spectral density of the white frequency noise. Adev measurement at each of the detuning points in Fig. 2a is used to infer the $${S}_{\nu }$$ values that are plotted in Fig. 2b. There, a frequency noise enhancement is observed as the system is biased toward an EP. Also plotted is the Petermann factor noise enhancement (Eq. (3)). Aside from a slight discrepancy at intermediate detuning frequencies (analyzed further below), there is an overall excellent agreement between theory and measurement. The frequency noise levels measured in Fig. 2b are consistent with fundamental SBL frequency noise (see Methods). Significantly, the fundamental nature of the noise, the good agreement between the PF prediction (Eq. (3)) and measurement in Fig. 2b, and separate experimental work24 that has verified the theoretical form of the SEF (Eq. (2)) confirm that SEF = PF so that the fundamental sensitivity limit of the gyroscope is not improved by operation near the EP.

While the Petermann factor analysis provides very good agreement with the measured results, we also derived an Adler-like coupled mode equation analysis for the Brillouin laser system. This approach is distinct from the bi-orthogonal framework and, while more complicated, provides additional insights into the system behavior. Adapting analysis applied in the noise analysis of ring laser gyroscopes47, a noise enhancement factor NEF results (see Supplementary Note 4),

$${\rm{NEF}}=\frac{\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}^{2}+\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}^{2}/2}{\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}^{2}-\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}^{2}}$$
(4)

It is interesting that this result, despite the different physical context of the Brillouin laser system, has a similar form to one derived for polarization-mode-coupled laser systems53. The PF and NEF predictions are shown in Fig. 2b and the Adler-derived NEF correction provides slightly better agreement with the data at the intermediate detuning values.

The Adler approach is also useful to explain a locking zone dependence upon SBL amplitudes observed in Fig. 2a. As shown in Supplementary Note 4, this variation can be explained through the combined action of the Kerr effect and intermodal coupling coefficients of both dissipative and conservative nature. Specifically, the locking bandwidth is found to exhibit the following dependence upon the amplitude ratio $$q=| {a}_{{\rm{ccw}}}/{a}_{{\rm{cw}}}|$$ of the SBL lasers,

$$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}^{2}={\left(\frac{{\rm{\Gamma }}}{{\rm{\Gamma }}+\gamma }\right)}^{2}\left[{\left(q+\frac{1}{q}\right)}^{2}| \kappa {|}^{2}+{\left(q-\frac{1}{q}\right)}^{2}| \chi {|}^{2}\right]$$
(5)

where $$\kappa$$ is the dissipative coupling and $$\chi$$ is the conservative coupling between cw and ccw SBL modes. The locking zone boundaries in terms of pump detuning frequency have been measured (Fig. 3 inset) for a series of different SBL powers. Using this data, the locking bandwidth is expressed in pump frequency detuning ($$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{P}}}$$) units using $$\Delta{\omega }_{C}\equiv (1+{\rm{\Gamma }}/\gamma )\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}$$ and plotted versus $$q$$ in the main panel of Fig. 3. The plot agrees well with Eq. (5) (fitting shown in black) and gives $$| \kappa |$$ = 0.93 kHz, $$| \chi |$$ = 8.21 kHz.

Finally, the center of the locking band is shifted by the Kerr effect and (in pump frequency detuning $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{P}}}$$ units) can be expressed as $$-({\rm{\Gamma }}/\gamma )\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{Kerr}}}$$, where $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{Kerr}}}=\eta \left({\left|{a}_{{\rm{ccw}}}\right|}^{2}-{\left|{a}_{{\rm{cw}}}\right|}^{2}\right)=(\eta \Delta{P}_{{\rm{SBL}}})/({\gamma }_{{\rm{ex}}}\hslash \omega )$$ is the Kerr induced SBL resonance frequency difference, $$\Delta{P}_{{\rm{SBL}}}={P}_{{\rm{ccw}}}-{P}_{{\rm{cw}}}$$ is the output power difference of the SBLs, and $${\gamma }_{{\rm{ex}}}$$ is the photon decay rate due to the output coupling. Also, $$\eta ={n}_{2}\hslash {\omega }^{2}c/(V{n}_{0}^{2})$$ is the single-photon Kerr-effect angular frequency shift with $$\omega$$ the SBL angular frequency, $${n}_{2}$$ the Kerr-nonlinear refractive index of silica, $$V$$ the mode volume, $${n}_{0}$$ the linear refractive index, and $$c$$ the speed of light in vacuum. If the white frequency noise floors in Fig. 2 are used to infer the resonator quality factor, then a Kerr nonlinearity value of 558 Hz μW−1 is predicted (see Methods). This value gives the line plot in the Fig. 3 inset (with no free parameters), which agrees with experiment.

## Discussion

Prior work has shown that Brillouin laser gyroscopes when operated near an EP have an improved responsivity (equivalently, an increase in the gyroscope’s scale factor for transduction of rotation rate into the Sagnac frequency shift)24. At the same time, these measurements have shown that the gyroscope’s sensitivity did not improve near the EP. We have verified through measurement and theory that mode non-orthogonality induced by the EP explains this latter result. Specifically, increasing mode non-orthogonality occurs when the two system eigenvectors (optical modes) begin to coalesce near the EP. This, in turn, increases laser frequency noise from an increasing Petermann factor and thereby reduces sensitivity. Curiously, these two mechanisms, the enhanced transduction and enhanced noise, feature an almost identical dependence upon the system’s proximity to the EP. In effect, the increased signal response in the gyroscope arising from the EP does not lead to an improvement in the minimum detectable signal (sensitivity).

It is interesting to note that a recent theoretical study of noise limitations in a class of non-lasing EP sensors showed no fundamental sensitivity advantage for operation near the EP28. Nonetheless it is still possible that other sensing modalities could benefit from operation near an EP. Moreover, open systems offer other potentially useful ways for transduction of rotation54. Also, the proposal of conservative nonlinear mode coupling provides a potential way to enhance the Sagnac effect55,56,57. The apparent divergence of the linewidth near the EP is an interesting feature of the current model and also one that agrees well with the data (at least in the range of the measurement). Nonetheless, constraints to this divergence set by the linewidth of the passive cavity loss are a subject of further study. More generally, the excellent control of the state space that is possible in the Brillouin system can provide a new platform for studies of the remarkable physics associated with exceptional points.

## Methods

### Linewidth and Allan deviation measurement

In experiments, frequency is measured in the time domain using a frequency counter and its Allan deviation is calculated for different averaging times (Fig. 2a). The Allan deviation $${\sigma }_{\nu }(\tau )$$ for a signal frequency is defined by

$${\sigma }_{\nu }\left(\tau \right)\equiv \sqrt{\frac{1}{2\left(M-1\right)}\sum _{k=1}^{M-1}{\left({\bar{\nu }}_{k+1}-{\bar{\nu }}_{k}\right)}^{2}}$$
(6)

where $$\tau$$ is the averaging time, $$M$$ is the number of frequency measurements, and $${\overline{\nu }}_{k}$$ is the average frequency of the signal (measured in Hz) in the time interval between $$k\tau$$ and $$(k+1)\tau$$. The Allan deviation follows a $${\tau }^{-1/2}$$ dependence when the underlying frequency noise spectral density is white52 as occurs for laser frequency noise limited by spontaneous emission. White noise causes the lineshape of the laser to be a Lorentzian. White noise is also typically dominant in the Allan deviation plot at shorter averaging times where flicker noise and frequency drift are not yet important. This portion of the Allan deviation plot can be fit using $${\sigma }_{\nu }(\tau )=\sqrt{{S}_{\nu }/(2\tau )}$$ where $${S}_{\nu }$$ is the white frequency noise one-sided spectral density function. This result can be further converted to the Lorentzian full-width at half maximum (FWHM) linewidth $$\Delta{\nu }_{{\rm{FWHM}}}$$ (measured in Hz) using the conversion,

$${S}_{\nu }=2{\sigma }_{\nu }^{2}(\tau )\tau =\frac{1}{\pi }\Delta{\nu }_{{\rm{FWHM}}}$$
(7)

### Experimental parameters and data fitting

The resonator is pumped at the optical wavelength $$\lambda =1553.3$$ nm, which, subject to the Brillouin phase matching condition, corresponds to a phonon frequency (Stokes frequency shift) of approximately $${{\rm{\Omega }}}_{{\rm{phonon}}}/(2\pi )=10.8$$ GHz. Quality factors of the SBL modes are measured using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, and a loaded Q factor $${Q}_{{\rm{T}}}=88\times 1{0}^{6}$$ and coupling Q factor $${Q}_{{\rm{ex}}}=507\times 1{0}^{6}$$ are obtained.

The theoretical formula for the white frequency noise of the beat frequency far away from the EP reads,

$${S}_{\nu }={\left(\frac{{\rm{\Gamma }}}{\gamma +{\rm{\Gamma }}}\right)}^{2}\frac{\hslash {\omega }^{3}}{4{\pi }^{2}{Q}_{{\rm{T}}}{Q}_{{\rm{ex}}}}\left(\frac{1}{{P}_{{\rm{cw}}}}+\frac{1}{{P}_{{\rm{ccw}}}}\right)\left({n}_{{\rm{th}}}+{N}_{{\rm{th}}}+1\right)$$
(8)

which results from summing the Schawlow-Townes-like linewidths of the SBL laser waves33. In the expression, $${N}_{{\rm{th}}}$$ and $${n}_{{\rm{th}}}$$ are the thermal occupation numbers of the SBL state and phonon state, respectively. At room temperature, $${n}_{{\rm{th}}}\approx 577$$ and $${N}_{{\rm{th}}}\approx 0$$. For the power balanced case (orange data set in Fig. 2), Pcw = Pccw = 215 μW and the predicted white frequency noise (Eq. (8)) is $${S}_{\nu }$$ = 0.50 Hz2 Hz−1. For the blue (red) data set, $${P}_{{\rm{cw}}}$$ ($${P}_{{\rm{ccw}}}$$) is decreased by 1.22 dB (1.46 dB) so that $${S}_{\nu }=$$ 0.58 (0.60) Hz2 Hz−1 is calculated. On the other hand, the measured values for the blue, orange and red data sets in Fig. 2b (i.e., white frequency noise floors far from EP) give $${S}_{\nu }=$$ 0.44, 0.39, 0.46 Hz2 Hz−1, respectively. The difference here is attributed to errors in Q measurement. For example, the experimental values of noise can be used to infer a corrected coupling Q factor $${Q}_{{\rm{ex}}}\approx 658\times 1{0}^{6}$$. Using this value below yields an excellent prediction of the Kerr nonlinear coefficient which supports this belief.

The beating frequency in Fig. 2a is fit using the following relations:

$$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{S}}} = {\rm{sgn}}(\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}})\sqrt{\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}}^{2}-\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}^{2}}\\ \Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{D}}} = \frac{\gamma /{\rm{\Gamma }}}{1+\gamma /{\rm{\Gamma }}}\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{P}}}+\frac{1}{1+\gamma /{\rm{\Gamma }}}\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{Kerr}}}$$
(9)

where sgn is the sign function and $$\gamma /{\rm{\Gamma }}$$, $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{Kerr}}}$$, and $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}$$ are fitting parameters. The fitting gives $$\gamma /{\rm{\Gamma }}=0.076$$ consistently, while $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{Kerr}}}$$ and $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{EP}}}$$ are separately adjusted in each data set. These parameters feature a power dependence that is fully explored in Fig. 3 and the related main text discussion.

The theoretical Kerr coefficient used in Fig. 3 can be calculated as follows. Assuming $${n}_{2}\approx 2.7\times 1{0}^{-20}$$ $${\text{m}}^{2}/\text{W}\,$$, $${n}_{0}=1.45$$ for the silica material, and V = 107 μm3 (obtained through finite-element simulations for the 36mm-diameter disk used here), gives $$\eta /2\pi \approx 1{0}^{-5}$$ Hz. Using the $${Q}_{{\rm{ex}}}$$ corrected by the white frequency noise data (see discussion above), $${\gamma }_{{\rm{ex}}}/2\pi =299$$ kHz so that $$\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{Kerr}}}/(2\pi \Delta{P}_{{\rm{SBL}}})\approx 42$$ Hz μW−1. When $$\gamma /{\rm{\Gamma }}=0.076$$, the center shift of pump locking band is $$-({\rm{\Gamma }}/\gamma )\Delta{\omega }_{{\rm{Kerr}}}$$ = 558 Hz μW−1. This value agrees very well with experiment (Fig. 3 inset).

## Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

## References

1. 1.

Bender, C. M. & Boettcher, S. Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998).

2. 2.

Bender, C. M. Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 947 (2007).

3. 3.

Feng, L., El-Ganainy, R. & Ge, L. Non-Hermitian photonics based on parity-time symmetry. Nat. Photonics 11, 752–762 (2017).

4. 4.

El-Ganainy, R., Khajavikhan, M., Christodoulides, D. N. & Ozdemir, S. K. The dawn of non-Hermitian optics. Commun. Phys 2, 1–5 (2019).

5. 5.

Miri, M.-A. & Alù, A. Exceptional points in optics and photonics. Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).

6. 6.

Lee, S.-B. et al. Observation of an exceptional point in a chaotic optical microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 134101 (2009).

7. 7.

Guo, A. et al. Observation of PT-symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009).

8. 8.

Rüter, C. E. et al. Observation of parity-time symmetry in optics. Nat. Phys 6, 192–195 (2010).

9. 9.

Regensburger, A. et al. Parity-time synthetic photonic lattices. Nature 488, 167–171 (2012).

10. 10.

Peng, B. et al. Parity-time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities. Nat. Phys. 10, 394–398 (2014).

11. 11.

Doppler, J. et al. Dynamically encircling an exceptional point for asymmetric mode switching. Nature 537, 76–79 (2016).

12. 12.

Peng, B. et al. Loss-induced suppression and revival of lasing. Science 346, 328–332 (2014).

13. 13.

Feng, L., Wong, Z. J., Ma, R.-M., Wang, Y. & Zhang, X. Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking. Science 346, 972–975 (2014).

14. 14.

Hodaei, H., Miri, M.-A., Heinrich, M., Christodoulides, D. N. & Khajavikhan, M. Parity-time-symmetric microring lasers. Science 346, 975–978 (2014).

15. 15.

Brandstetter, M. et al. Reversing the pump dependence of a laser at an exceptional point. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–7 (2014).

16. 16.

Wiersig, J. Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: application to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 203901 (2014).

17. 17.

Liu, Z.-P. et al. Metrology with PT-symmetric cavities: enhanced sensitivity near the PT-phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 110802 (2016).

18. 18.

Ren, J. et al. Ultrasensitive micro-scale parity-time-symmetric ring laser gyroscope. Opt. Lett. 42, 1556–1559 (2017).

19. 19.

Sunada, S. Large Sagnac frequency splitting in a ring resonator operating at an exceptional point. Phys. Rev. A 96, 033842 (2017).

20. 20.

Chen, P.-Y. et al. Generalized parity-time symmetry condition for enhanced sensor telemetry. Nat. Electron. 1, 297–304 (2018).

21. 21.

Dong, Z., Li, Z., Yang, F., Qiu, C.-W. & Ho, J. S. Sensitive readout of implantable microsensors using a wireless system locked to an exceptional point. Nat. Electron. 2, 335–342 (2019).

22. 22.

Chen, W., Özdemir, Ş. K., Zhao, G., Wiersig, J. & Yang, L. Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity. Nature 548, 192–196 (2017).

23. 23.

Hodaei, H. et al. Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points. Nature 548, 187–191 (2017).

24. 24.

Lai, Y.-H., Lu, Y.-K., Suh, M.-G., Yuan, Z. & Vahala, K. Observation of the exceptional-point-enhanced Sagnac effect. Nature 576, 65–69 (2019).

25. 25.

Hokmabadi, M. P., Schumer, A., Christodoulides, D. N. & Khajavikhan, M. Non-Hermitian ring laser gyroscopes with enhanced Sagnac sensitivity. Nature 576, 70–74 (2019).

26. 26.

Zhang, M. et al. Quantum noise theory of exceptional point sensors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 180501 (2019).

27. 27.

Langbein, W. No exceptional precision of exceptional-point sensors. Phys. Rev. A 98, 023805 (2018).

28. 28.

Lau, H.-K. & Clerk, A. A. Fundamental limits and non-reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sensing. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–13 (2018).

29. 29.

Chen, C., Jin, L. & Liu, R.-B. Sensitivity of parameter estimation near the exceptional point of a non-Hermitian system. New J. Phys. 21, 083002 (2019).

30. 30.

Mortensen, N. A. et al. Fluctuations and noise-limited sensing near the exceptional point of parity-time-symmetric resonator systems. Optica 5, 1342–1346 (2018).

31. 31.

Post, E. J. Sagnac effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 475–493 (1967).

32. 32.

Li, J., Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Microresonator Brillouin gyroscope. Optica 4, 346–348 (2017).

33. 33.

Li, J., Lee, H., Chen, T. & Vahala, K. J. Characterization of a high coherence, Brillouin microcavity laser on silicon. Opt. Express 20, 20170–20180 (2012).

34. 34.

Petermann, K. Calculated spontaneous emission factor for double-heterostructure injection lasers with gain-induced waveguiding. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 15, 566–570 (1979).

35. 35.

Siegman, A. Excess spontaneous emission in non-hermitian optical systems. I. Laser amplifiers. Phys. Rev. A 39, 1253 (1989).

36. 36.

Hamel, W. & Woerdman, J. Observation of enhanced fundamental linewidth of a laser due to nonorthogonality of its longitudinal eigenmodes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1506 (1990).

37. 37.

Cheng, Y.-J., Fanning, C. & Siegman, A. Experimental observation of a large excess quantum noise factor in the linewidth of a laser oscillator having nonorthogonal modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 627 (1996).

38. 38.

Wenzel, H., Bandelow, U., Wunsche, H.-J. & Rehberg, J. Mechanisms of fast self pulsations in two-section DFB lasers. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32, 69–78 (1996).

39. 39.

Berry, M. V. Mode degeneracies and the Petermann excess-noise factor for unstable lasers. J. Mod. Opt. 50, 63–81 (2003).

40. 40.

Lee, S.-Y. et al. Divergent Petermann factor of interacting resonances in a stadium-shaped microcavity. Phys. Rev. A 78, 015805 (2008).

41. 41.

Wiersig, J., Kim, S. W. & Hentschel, M. Asymmetric scattering and nonorthogonal mode patterns in optical microspirals. Phys. Rev. A 78, 053809 (2008).

42. 42.

Schomerus, H. Excess quantum noise due to mode nonorthogonality in dielectric microresonators. Phys. Rev. A 79, 061801 (2009).

43. 43.

Yoo, G., Sim, H.-S. & Schomerus, H. Quantum noise and mode nonorthogonality in non-hermitian PT-symmetric optical resonators. Phys. Rev. A 84, 063833 (2011).

44. 44.

Chong, Y. & Stone, A. D. General linewidth formula for steady-state multimode lasing in arbitrary cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 063902 (2012).

45. 45.

Zhang, J. et al. A phonon laser operating at an exceptional point. Nat. Photonics 12, 479–484 (2018).

46. 46.

Adler, R. A study of locking phenomena in oscillators. Proc. IRE 34, 351–357 (1946).

47. 47.

Cresser, J. Quantum noise in ring-laser gyros. III. Approximate analytic results in unlocked region. Phys. Rev. A 26, 398 (1982).

48. 48.

Lee, H. et al. Chemically etched ultrahigh-Q wedge-resonator on a silicon chip. Nat. Photonics 6, 369 (2012).

49. 49.

Spreeuw, R., Neelen, R. C., Van Druten, N., Eliel, E. & Woerdman, J. Mode coupling in a He-Ne ring laser with backscattering. Phys. Rev. A 42, 4315 (1990).

50. 50.

Cai, M., Painter, O. & Vahala, K. J. Observation of critical coupling in a fiber taper to a silica-microsphere whispering-gallery mode system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 74 (2000).

51. 51.

Spillane, S., Kippenberg, T., Painter, O. & Vahala, K. Ideality in a fiber-taper-coupled microresonator system for application to cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 043902 (2003).

52. 52.

Ferre-Pikal, E. S.  et al.  IEEE standard definitions of physical quantities for fundamental frequency and time metrology—random instabilities. IEEE Std Std 1139–2008 c1–35 (IEEE, 2009).

53. 53.

Van der Lee, A. et al. Excess quantum noise due to nonorthogonal polarization modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4357 (1997).

54. 54.

Sarma, R., Ge, L., Wiersig, J. & Cao, H. Rotating optical microcavities with broken chiral symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 053903 (2015).

55. 55.

Kaplan, A. & Meystre, P. Enhancement of the Sagnac effect due to nonlinearly induced nonreciprocity. Opt. Lett. 6, 590–592 (1981).

56. 56.

Wright, E. M., Meystre, P., Firth, W. & Kaplan, A. Theory of the nonlinear Sagnac effect in a fiber-optic gyroscope. Phys. Rev. A 32, 2857 (1985).

57. 57.

Del Bino, L., Silver, J. M., Stebbings, S. L. & Del’Haye, P. Symmetry breaking of counter-propagating light in a nonlinear resonator. Sci. Rep. 7, 43142 (2017).

## Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under PRIGM:AIMS program through SPAWAR (grant no. N66001-16-1-4046) and the Kavli Nanoscience Institute.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

H.W., Y-H.L., and K.V. conceived the idea. H.W. derived the theory with feedback from Y-H.L., Z.Y., and K.V. Y-H.L. designed and perform the experiments with Z.Y. and H.W. Z.Y. analysed the data with Y-H.L. and H.W. M-G.S. fabricated the devices. All authors participated in writing the paper. K.V. supervised the research.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerry Vahala.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Wang, H., Lai, YH., Yuan, Z. et al. Petermann-factor sensitivity limit near an exceptional point in a Brillouin ring laser gyroscope. Nat Commun 11, 1610 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15341-6

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Observation of exceptional point in a PT broken non-Hermitian system simulated using a quantum circuit

• Geng-Li Zhang
• , Di Liu
•  & Man-Hong Yung

Scientific Reports (2021)