Animals must slow or halt locomotion to integrate sensory inputs or to change direction. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the GABAergic and peptidergic neuron RIS mediates developmentally timed quiescence. Here, we show RIS functions additionally as a locomotion stop neuron. RIS optogenetic stimulation caused acute and persistent inhibition of locomotion and pharyngeal pumping, phenotypes requiring FLP-11 neuropeptides and GABA. RIS photoactivation allows the animal to maintain its body posture by sustaining muscle tone, yet inactivating motor neuron oscillatory activity. During locomotion, RIS axonal Ca2+ signals revealed functional compartmentalization: Activity in the nerve ring process correlated with locomotion stop, while activity in a branch correlated with induced reversals. GABA was required to induce, and FLP-11 neuropeptides were required to sustain locomotion stop. RIS attenuates neuronal activity and inhibits movement, possibly enabling sensory integration and decision making, and exemplifies dual use of one cell across development in a compact nervous system.
Animals actively stop locomotion in order to await certain events or to avoid potentially dangerous situations. In order to quickly resume locomotion after the stop, they must keep their muscle tone. This is in contrast to phases of behavioral quiescence, or sleep, where vertebrates typically lose their muscle tone and assume a relaxed body posture1,2. In limbed animals, multi-layered neuronal systems control locomotion3. Central pattern generators (CPGs) in the spinal cord mediate (1) rhythm generation, usually by networks of excitatory neurons that oscillate and cause mutual inhibition via interneurons, and (2) pattern generation that regulates motor neurons (MNs), and thus muscle action, to orchestrate coordinated movements underlying locomotion. For left–right coordination during walking, inhibitory and excitatory commissural interneurons are required4,5. Locomotion is triggered by excitatory signals descending from supraspinal regions of the mid-brain or hindbrain (in mammals6) or of the brain stem (in tadpoles7), which “call” the spinal CPG networks into action. Recently, a class of interneurons in the murine brainstem was shown to induce a stop command for the pattern generation systems8. These V2a “stop” neurons project to excitatory and inhibitory spinal cord neurons, inducing locomotion halt likely via inhibition of rhythm-generating neurons. The stop neurons do not reduce muscle tone and do not inhibit MNs. Thus the animal does not collapse but rather can quickly resume locomotion. Equivalents of these “stop neurons” and systems for slowing were identified in non-limbed vertebrates9,10 and recently also in Drosophila11, where descending interneurons induce locomotion stop during navigation of odorant gradients, while activity of other neurons causes slowing12. However, molecular identities of stop cells are only partly known, and also different organisms appear to use different mechanisms and partly redundant circuitry to induce locomotion stop13. Thus it is unclear whether “stop” systems evolved several times or whether a primordial locomotion stop system diversified into the different systems present today in different organisms.
In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans with its much smaller number of neurons, rhythm generation resides in the MNs. Ventral cord excitatory MNs coordinate the undulatory behavior for forward and backward locomotion (B- and A-class, respectively). They exhibit oscillatory activity patterns that are entrained by proprioceptive feedback as well as bi-directional coupling by premotor interneurons (PINs) in the ventral nerve cord14,15,16,17. In addition, the AS-class of asymmetric MNs exhibits oscillatory activity, interacts with PINs, and contributes to propagation of the body wave18.
Activity of vertebrate stop neurons contrasts descending pathways that are active during sleep, which halt locomotion and affect muscle relaxation through inhibitory reticulospinal neurons19. Sleep also occurs in C. elegans: (1) Lethargus, also called developmentally timed sleep (DTS), occurring during larval molt transitions20, and (2) stress-induced sleep (SIS), in response to cellular insults21,22. Both states are similar with a lack of locomotion and feeding, as well as increased arousal threshold. They are regulated by distinct neuropeptidergic pathways and neurons, i.e., NLP-8, FLP-24, FLP-13 (neuropeptide-like protein, FMRFamide-like peptide) neuropeptides and the ALA (anterior lateral A) neuron for SIS20,23, while the GABAergic and neuropeptidergic RIS (ring interneuron S) neuron, as well as NLP-22 neuropeptides, are required for DTS24,25. RIS photoactivation induced lethargus in larvae, independent of GABA, while FLP-11 neuropeptides were required for RIS-induced sleep, and their overexpression sufficed to cause lethargus26. In Ascaris, FLP-11 was shown to be inhibitory to muscle cells27. Also in other species, sleep and arousal are encoded by neuropeptidergic and biogenic amine neurotransmitters28. In mammals, sleep is mainly regulated in the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus, where GABAergic and galanin-releasing neurons inhibit orexin/hypocretin-releasing neurons during sleep, while these modulators are released during (and promote) wakefulness29. Mutations in the orexin receptor or abnormal activity in the hypothalamic area may lead to narcolepsy or catalepsy30. Orexin homologs were found in insects (allatotropin) but not in C. elegans, where instead FLP-21 and NLP-49 neuropeptides as well as pigment-dispersing factor mediate arousal31,32,33,34. Stop neurons were not identified in C. elegans to date.
Adult C. elegans show behavioral quiescence during satiety, starvation, or recovery from stress, e.g., heat shock22,23,35. These states are associated with the RIS and ALA neurons, but it is unclear whether RIS has functions other than as a pure sleep neuron. In the compact C. elegans nervous system, neurons often multitask, thus RIS might be utilized for additional functions. C. elegans frequently interrupts its predominantly forward locomotion by brief reversals, then resumes forward locomotion with a change in direction. It is only partially understood which neurons orchestrate this pirouette behavior and in which sequence they may act36,37. Forward locomotion slows down before the animal briefly stops, and this part of the pirouette could be actively controlled by neuronal activity38. Thus, may the RIS neuron function like vertebrate stop neurons, i.e., inducing a brief locomotion stop while maintaining muscle tone, to enable directional changes? Furthermore, may functions of sleep and stop neurons have been combined in one cell in the compact worm nervous system, and could this thus represent an evolutionary ancient mechanism from which sleep and stop systems diversified into distinct systems?
We address these questions by (opto-)genetics and by imaging activity of RIS during locomotion. Genetic ablation of RIS reduces reversal and stop events. Specific RIS photoactivation induces a full locomotion stop and also affects other rhythmic behaviors, like pharyngeal pumping. RIS stimulation is accompanied by sustained Ca2+ levels in body wall muscle (BWM) cells and inhibition of oscillatory activity in MNs. RIS-dependent behavioral responses are largely blocked without neuropeptidergic transmission, while interfering with GABA transmission affects their kinetics, and eliminating gap junctions uncovers further functions of RIS within circuits coordinating forward/backward transitions. The major determinant of RIS effects in adults, just as in larval sleep, is the FLP-11 neuropeptide. RIS shows compartmentalized axonal Ca2+ transients. In the nerve ring process, the onset of these signals correlates with the onset of locomotion slowing, while in an axonal branch, they are correlated with the induction of reversals and require FLP-11 signaling. Our work dissects the function of a C. elegans “stop” neuron, providing new insights into the roles and circuits of such neurons. It may help to understand such neurons, identified only phenotypically12, and emphasizes that stop cells may exist widely across locomotion systems.
Single-cell-specific expression and photoactivation of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) in RIS induces locomotion stop
We achieved conditional expression of ChR2 and green fluorescent protein (GFP) in the single RIS neuron. Animals showed fluorescence in a single cell body located in the ventral ganglion, next to the pharyngeal posterior bulb, on the right side of the head. RIS has a single process extending anteriorly toward the nerve ring, with a short branch reaching into the ventral nerve cord, while the axonal process wraps around the isthmus of the pharynx (Fig. 1a). When animals expressing RIS::ChR2 were cultivated in presence of all-trans retinal (ATR) and illuminated with blue light, all locomotion behavior stopped: On average, velocity dropped not only by 80% within 4–5 s (τ = 1.67 s; Fig. 1b; Supplementary Movie 1) but also quite immediate for individual animals, i.e., 1–2 s (Supplementary Fig. 1A). We analyzed the body posture of the animals, i.e., bending angles demarcated by three adjacent points along the body axis (Fig. 1c)39. Forward locomotion (sinusoidal body wave propagating antero-posteriorly) stopped upon RIS photostimulation: During the 10 s light stimulation, bending angles were “frozen”, i.e., the body posture was maintained. This contrasts the stop in locomotion upon photostimulation of all GABAergic MNs40, where animals resumed behavior after a few seconds of photostimulation, though being uncoordinated (Supplementary Movie 2). GABA neuron photostimulation causes overall body elongation by 4%40. Also RIS photoactivation induced body elongation, however, only ca. 2.5%, affecting only the anterior third, which elongated ca. 10% (Fig. 1d). Thus RIS may inhibit neurons driving the undulations, with some anterior muscle relaxation. RIS photoactivation also attenuated responses to mechanical stimulation, where a harsh touch to the head region led mostly to short reversals smaller than one body length; conversely, after RIS photoactivation, almost all animals reacted with a long reversal (Fig. 1e). During DTS, mechanical stimulation was shown to activate RIS, likely to suppress wake behaviors41, thus RIS photoactivation might mimic this larval behavior inhibition. To ask whether RIS is sufficient or required for reversals and stops, we ablated it using cell-specific overexpression of the apoptosis inducer EGL-1 (“egg-laying defective”), with GFP as a marker22. Animals lacking RIS showed significantly fewer long reversals and stops than wild type (WT; Fig. 1f), demonstrating a requirement of RIS for these behaviors.
Last, rhythmic pumping of the pharynx, the muscular feeding organ, ceased during 30 s RIS photoactivation depending on light intensity (Supplementary Fig. 1B). In electropharyngeograms (EPGs), i.e., extracellular recordings of electrical activity associated with pharyngeal contractions42, RIS photostimulation generally evoked a complete absence of electrical transients and on average significantly reduced the number of pump events (Supplementary Fig. 1C, D). Thus RIS activation, presumably through GABA and neuropeptide release, may inhibit pharyngeal pumping during locomotion reversals, in parallel to another established pathway for pumping inhibition using serotonin, the SER-2 receptor, and GαO signaling37.
RIS suppresses oscillatory activation of BWM by affecting cholinergic neurons
To explore the effects of RIS on the locomotion system, we used Ca2+ imaging. RCaMP1h, a red-fluorescent genetically encoded Ca2+ indicator43, was specifically expressed in BWMs in addition to ChR2 in RIS, and animals were physically immobilized44 (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Movie 3). Ca2+ signals were monitored over time, either in dorso-ventrally opposite regions (Fig. 2a, b) or in line scans along the animals’ dorsal muscles, assessed as “kymograms” spanning the body length (Fig. 2a, c). Despite the absence of dynamic proprioceptive feedback, muscular Ca2+ levels visibly fluctuated along the body. Ca2+ levels were high in bent regions, in line with muscular activity underlying the body bend, and with the proprioceptive coupling of MNs in one body segment to the anterior segment45. The Ca2+ signals oscillated at low frequency (ca. 0.12 Hz) in a dorso-ventrally reciprocal fashion (Fig. 2b). They could thus reflect rhythmic activity of the cholinergic MNs innervating the respective muscle cells. Oscillations were much slower than in free-moving animals (~0.36 Hz;46 note that, due to immobilization, no traveling of the Ca2+ wave is observed). During RIS ChR2 activation, this oscillatory activity essentially stopped, while BWM Ca2+ levels did not obviously change (Fig. 2c; for Δ [Ca2+] over time, see Supplementary Movie 3B). Since oscillations were asynchronous across animals and to enable comparisons independent of actual signal intensities, we used sample autocorrelation, where the autocorrelation period reflects the extent of oscillatory activity (Fig. 2d). For animals grown without ATR, the period duration did not differ between the dark and lit periods, while it significantly increased with ATR present (Fig. 2e), indicating robust slowing of oscillations (since during 20 s stimulation often no full oscillations occurred, we assumed a 20 s minimum of the period).
Next, we assessed these effects in body muscle, i.e., downstream of MNs, by electrophysiology. Miniature postsynaptic currents (mPSCs) report on release of neurotransmitter from single synaptic vesicles (Fig. 3a). If RIS photodepolarization reduced muscle activity by inhibiting MNs, we would expect reduced mPSC rates. However, RIS::ChR2 photoactivation neither abolished nor reduced mPSCs and their frequency or amplitude (Fig. 3a–c). This indicates that MNs did not reduce their activity during RIS signaling and released the same amount of transmitter. Possibly they altered their relative activities, e.g., if the frequency of oscillation of the CPGs they constitute is altered, and thus MN activity may have become asynchronous. We thus analyzed the frequencies of the observed mPSCs (Fig. 3d). Predominantly low frequencies were populated in this analysis, and RIS photoactivation caused a significant reduction of their power. We also assessed muscular action potentials, which occurred at low frequency, not obviously silenced by RIS photostimulation (Supplementary Fig. 2). Thus, muscle tone is maintained during RIS activity, while MN activity is desynchronized.
As the observed muscle activity is evoked by MNs even in restrained animals47, we wanted to analyze MNs directly. If RIS effects on BWM Ca2+ fluctuations occur at the MN level, Ca2+ fluctuations in MNs may seize during RIS photoactivation. We expressed RCaMP in a large subset (132/160) of cholinergic neurons, encompassing all synaptic cholinergic partners of RIS (VB, DB, AS, RMD, SMD, SDQ, PVC, AVE, including cells in the head ganglia, but excluding SAB; Supplementary Fig. 3A; see “Methods”), and analyzed Ca2+ dynamics before and during RIS photoactivation (Fig. 3e, f; Supplementary Movie 4). We observed spontaneous fluctuations in the signals across head MNs of ~0.17 Hz. RIS photoactivation increased the mean relative autocorrelation period 1.6-fold (Fig. 3g), i.e., activity in the head cholinergic nervous system was significantly reduced. No such effect was seen in animals raised without ATR. Thus RIS::ChR2 activity reduced Ca2+ oscillations in cholinergic neurons by slowing oscillatory activity in the neuronal network, which is the likely reason for the observed reduction of muscle oscillations.
RIS photostimulation effects are accelerated by GABA transmission
Effects of RIS on various behaviors could depend on different types of neurotransmission: RIS is GABAergic, peptidergic, and makes gap junctions, which may all be driven by ChR2 stimulation. In RIS’ control of DTS, GABA played no role, as lethargus still occurred in GABA-defective mutants, and was instead instructed by neuropeptidergic transmission26. We tested mutants of these signaling pathways by analyzing the locomotion state as forward, reverse, or stop categories, defined by a threshold of ±45 µm/s on the velocity trajectory. WT animals stopped locomotion during RIS photoactivation (Fig. 4a). After the stimulus ended, a significant proportion the animals resumed locomotion within 2 s, however, inducing reversals, from which they gradually returned to mostly forward locomotion. Mutants lacking the vesicular GABA transporter (“uncoordinated” unc-47(e307) animals) still exhibited the RIS-induced stop response, with delayed onset, and the post-stimulation reversal. RIS induced body elongation that was significantly stronger in unc-47 mutants than in WT (Fig. 4b). This appears paradoxical, yet, compared to WT, unc-47 animals are pre-contracted due to absence of GABA at the neuromuscular junction, thus inhibition of cholinergic dynamics by RIS (Fig. 3) likely causes more pronounced body elongation. In sum, GABA is not involved in maintaining RIS-induced locomotion stop phenotypes or the post-stimulation reversal but rather speeds up the slowing and stopping effects induced by RIS activation. This may be via RIB neurons, which were shown to increase locomotion speed, and to which RIS makes synapses48,49(Supplementary Fig. 3B).
RIS photostimulation induces subsequent reversals via gap junctions
RIS forms electrical synapses with five neuron types49 (Supplementary Fig. 3B): AIB, AVJ, DB, RIM, and SMD. We analyzed whether effects observed during and after RIS::ChR2 activation may be due to concomitant depolarization of these neurons in mutants lacking the innexin (gap junction subunit) UNC-9, expressed in RIS and forming homotypic or heterotypic gap junctions with itself or with UNC-750,51. Based on its expression pattern, lack of UNC-9 should affect gap junctions between RIS and AIB, AVJ, DB, SMD, and RIM52 (Supplementary Fig. 3C). RIM inhibits reversals53. Conversely, reversals can be induced by AIB neurons, which inhibit RIM, via disinhibition54. unc-9(e101) mutants showed a transient body elongation during RIS photoactivation (Fig. 4b), possibly due to RIS inhibitory transmitter release. However, unc-9 mutants neither increased stop probability upon RIS photostimulation nor did they induce reversals following RIS stimulation (Fig. 4a). Thus reversals mediated via AIB may be induced through RIS activation and gap junctions to AIB, and inhibitory transmission from AIB to RIM might overcome the putative electrical activation of RIM by RIS. Reversals following RIS stimulation may result from rebound activity upon offset of RIS–RIM electrical stimulation, and a longer-lasting RIS–AIB stimulation, disinhibiting RIM. Our findings for unc-9 animals are complicated by their low basal locomotion speed. Thus we assessed the angular speed of the head region before, during, and after RIS photoactivation as a proxy for speed (Fig. 4e). RIS activation inhibited head movements in WT and in unc-9(e101) mutants. We further analyzed whether RIS may evoke behavior via RIM, which is tyraminergic53, thus RIS depolarization could affect RIM tyramine release. SMD neurons together with RMD neurons control head movements by activating muscles. RIM/tyramine inhibits RMD, SMD, and head muscles49,55, thus changing locomotion stop probability56. The tyramine-deficient mutant tdc-1(n3419) moved almost only forward, and upon RIS photoactivation, animals displayed a significantly reduced propensity to stop (Fig. 3a). Also these animals showed no reversals after the RIS photostimulation period, yet the body elongated (Fig. 3b). In sum, RIS stimulation may affect slowing and subsequent reversals in part via RIM neurons.
RIS photostimulation effects require neuropeptides
We next assessed the role of neuropeptides in photoevoked RIS::ChR2 signaling by analyzing mutants lacking the Ca2+-dependent activator protein for secretion (CAPS, encoded by unc-31) or the pro-protein convertase EGL-3. UNC-31 is required for secretion of (many of the) mature neuropeptides, while EGL-3 mediates processing of most if not all neuropeptide precursors57. RIS photostimulation in unc-31(e1304) mutants still evoked stopping (Fig. 4a), thus release of neuropeptides mediating RIS effects may require factors other than UNC-3158. However, egl-3(gk238) mutants were largely affected and stopped significantly less than WT: Only a very transient (ca. 2 s) and minor speed reduction (~28%) was observed (Fig. 4c), while WT slowed down by ~72% and stopped for the entire 10 s illumination period (Fig. 1b). After a transient elongation during the first 2 s of RIS photoactivation (presumably due to GABA; Fig. 4d), egl-3(gk238) mutants on average showed no relaxation (Fig. 4b). RIS was previously shown to regulate DTS using FLP-11 neuropeptides26. flp-11(tm2706) mutants showed diminished RIS-induced elongation (Fig. 4b) and almost no stops. Instead, flp-11 animals reversed more, right after RIS stimulus onset (Fig. 4a), as observed for egl-3 mutants. FLP-11 peptides may inhibit AVE backward command interneurons via chemical synapses (Supplementary Fig. 3B), and without FLP-11 neuropeptides, AVE may more readily induce reversals, as also the AIB–RIM disinhibitory pathway is activated by RIS. The slowing response was much briefer in flp-11 mutants, and albeit transient stops were observed, no flp-11 animal stopped locomotion for the entire stimulus period. RIS activation in flp-11 mutants also caused no pharyngeal pumping inhibition (N = 3, 150 < n < 200 animals per trial). Since unc-47 GABA mutants had delayed stop phenotypes, while flp-11 mutants displayed transient stops at the start of RIS photoactivation, we wondered whether their phenotypes were independent. In unc-47; flp-11 double mutants, the RIS::ChR2-induced stop was completely abolished; however, reversals still occurred (Fig. 4a). In sum, efficient RIS-mediated locomotion stop is jointly induced by GABAergic and FLP-11 peptidergic signaling. The former modality evokes fast slowing, the latter causes sustained stops.
Recording of Ca2+ activity in the RIS axon and soma in freely moving animals
Photostimulated RIS affects locomotion, pharyngeal pumping, and withdrawal after mechanical stimuli via GABA, FLP-11, and possibly other neuropeptides acting on different cells. During intrinsic behavior, RIS is active along with other neurons. Singular stimulation of RIS, evoking the observed phenotypes, could thus artificially exaggerate only aspects of behaviors that occur when RIS is (co-)activated with/by other cells. We explored this by analyzing RIS activity in free-moving animals by Ca2+ imaging. We modified a previously described tracking system59. A four-quadrant photomultiplier controls a stage, keeping a fluorescent spot in the center, and a high-magnification fluorescence video is acquired. An infrared behavior video is acquired at low magnification, stage positions are recorded, and the combined data streams allow behavioral quantification and correlation with neuron activity. We expressed GCaMP6s in RIS, along with a red fluorescent protein in the pharyngeal terminal bulb (TB), to track the head region (Fig. 5a). As not RIS but the TB was tracked, the RIS image rotates around the center of the picture, while the animal changes direction. Custom-written software for image processing (1) registered images on the RIS cell body, (2) cropped a region of interest (ROI) containing the entire RIS morphology and rotated it such that the axon was oriented (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 5 and Movies 5 and 7), (3) defined a smaller ROI for each image, depicting only the RIS soma and axon, (4) fitted, along the spline of this ROI, a parabola, defined 100 equally spaced perpendicular segments, and quantified their fluorescence.
RIS axonal Ca2+ activity during locomotion is correlated with slowing and the onset of reversals
RIS Ca2+ activity, assessed on short time scales (in contrast to previous analyses during sleep), was transient, or lasted for several seconds, and coincided with slowing and/or reversals (Fig. 5c), for which the magnitude of the Ca2+ signal was indicative. Ca2+ rose stepwise while the animal slowed, until high levels were reached (Fig. 5d; Supplementary Movie 6) and the animals exhibited subsequent reversals. During those reversals, Ca2+ dropped and forward movement resumed a few seconds later. Across all events recorded, the main change in Ca2+ signal was observed in the nerve ring region of the RIS axon (Fig. 5e); sometimes activity was also observed in the branch (Fig. 5c, d; Supplementary Movies 7 and 8). Axonal Ca2+ transients are expected to be most indicative of relevant neuronal activity, likely correlated with transmitter release. Analyzing axonal events further helped to exclude noise from intestinal fluorescence. Thus we used only the fluorescence of the anterior half of the neuronal ROI, comprising the axon around the nerve ring, unless we also analyzed the axonal branch. Slowing and reversal events (as shown in Fig. 5c) were identified by analyzing locomotion based on the x, y position of the tracked animal and its body posture, allowing to derive directional velocity along the mid-body axis. The relative occurrence of reversals and Ca2+ peaks are shown in Fig. 6a, as probability distributions, aligned to the nearest Ca2+ peak or nearest reversal, respectively. The skew of these distributions suggested that reversals followed the onset of a Ca2+ rise. We aligned events recorded from 20 animals, either to Ca2+ peaks (Fig. 6b, d, 45 events) or to the moment of reversal (Supplementary Fig. 5A, 75 reversals). For Ca2+ peak-aligned data, we either analyzed velocity (becoming negative upon reversal), to probe if RIS Ca2+ may be a determinant of reversals (Fig. 6b), or absolute speed, to explore if RIS may be a speed sensor (Supplementary Fig. 6A).
RIS Ca2+ signals required ~1.2 s from detectable onset to peak (Fig. 6b). Concomitantly, a drop in velocity occurred, which in 80% of cases led to a reversal (mean velocity thus approached zero but remained positive). Animals significantly decreased velocity (Fig. 6b, box plot). We also assessed the onset of Ca2+ rise (determined from dF/dt), which likely coincides with transmitter release (Fig. 6b). Cross-correlation of the Ca2+ rise rate and velocity drop showed a low but significant coefficient of −0.15 and a time lag of −0.8 s (Fig. 6c). Thus the onset of the Ca2+ rise (green vertical line, Fig. 6b) preceded slowing, which is likely regulated by RIS. Correlating the moment of reversal and the Ca2+ signal indicated that RIS Ca2+ determines duration of reversals (Supplementary Fig. 5A). In sum, a rise in RIS Ca2+ preceded slowing and reversals, as also indicated by the event probabilities (Fig. 6a). We conclude that RIS activity precedes the behavioral change and may determine it.
We further analyzed how RIS activity is associated with behavioral changes by assessing the fraction of animals performing particular locomotion behaviors at and around the timing of RIS Ca2+ peaks (Fig. 6d, i). Before RIS became active, there was a similar propensity for animals to accelerate or to slow down. During the Ca2+ rise, animals were more likely to decelerate, and following the Ca2+ peak, reversal probability increased. Thus the likely moment of RIS releasing GABA and FLP-11 neuropeptides is correlated with, and most likely induces, inhibition of locomotion, preceding reversals, analogous to our observations upon RIS photostimulation (Fig. 1b). We conclude that RIS fulfills a crucial role in neuronal programs controlling forward–backward transitions.
FLP-11 neuropeptides are required for RIS’ effects on locomotion speed
RIS affects locomotion slowing and is particularly active before reversals. As FLP-11 neuropeptides were required for stopping, we asked whether in flp-11 mutants RIS Ca2+ activity occurs but may be unable to evoke behaviors. From 24 flp-11 animals, we recorded 100 reversals (Supplementary Fig. 5B) and 25 Ca2+ events (Fig. 6e–h). Overall occurrence of reversals or Ca2+ events did not differ between WT and flp-11 (Fisher’s exact tests, two sided, p = 0.865 and 0.055, respectively, n.s.), thus network functions appeared normal. As in WT, flp-11 mutants displayed similarly skewed probability distributions for reversals and Ca2+ peaks (Fig. 6e). Reversal induction per se is independent of FLP-11. Slowing, on average, was less pronounced during RIS Ca2+ rise events, which were less frequently paired to slowing or reversals; thus reversal velocity (Fig. 6f) and speed (Supplementary Fig. 6B) were not significantly different before and during the Ca2+ rise. No significant cross-correlation of the Ca2+ rise rate and velocity was found (Fig. 6g). flp-11 mutants did not show significant changes in the proportion of forward, reverse, accelerating, or slowing subsequent to a Ca2+ transient, while these proportions were significantly different between WT and flp-11, and flp-11 animals reversed more prior to RIS Ca2+ signals (Fig. 6d, h, i). In sum, locomotion, particularly slowing, is abnormally regulated in flp-11 mutants. RIS’ tight control of the timing of reversals after a stop requires FLP-11 release, which also aids in sustaining stops (Fig. 4a), while it elicits fast slowing by GABA. Yet, as reversals occur after RIS photostimulation even without GABA and FLP-11, additional neurons must partake in inducing reversals.
Compartmentalized Ca2+ dynamics in the RIS axon
In flp-11 mutants, RIS was on average less efficient in causing slowing. This was intriguing, since we could still observe occasional reversal events. We asked whether there is a specific feature of RIS Ca2+ activity that distinguishes such events. We segregated the RIS Ca2+-aligned events into those paired with a reversal and those that merely led to a velocity reduction or stop. We then assessed Ca2+ signals spatiotemporally, from soma to nerve ring, encompassing also the branch, focusing on the 2 s centered on the Ca2+ event. To capture dynamic changes, Ca2+ signals were normalized to the first 150 ms of this time window, and significantly different Ca2+ levels were color coded (Fig. 7).
In the RIS nerve ring region, we observed Ca2+ signals for both types of events, i.e., paired (Fig. 5d, e.g., seconds 28–30; Fig. 7a) or unpaired to a reversal (Fig. 5d, e.g., seconds 21–23; Fig. 7b). Interestingly, events paired to a reversal showed significantly increased Ca2+ dynamics in the branch region (Fig. 7a; Supplementary Movies 7 and 8A), which were absent when animals only slowed or stopped (Fig. 7b; Supplementary Movies 7 and 8B). Furthermore, reversal–unpaired events showed a significant reduction in branch Ca2+ signals ~750 ms preceding the maximal nerve ring Ca2+ signal. In these events, no significant activity was observable in the branch, even when the nerve ring region was active (Fig. 7b). We conclude that RIS axonal Ca2+ dynamics are compartmentalized and that the branch region has a specific function in induction of, or concomitant with, reversals. RIS axonal Ca2+ in flp-11(tm2706) mutants had no significant dynamics during reversals (Fig. 7c), while events paired only to a stop still showed nerve ring activity, though no significant reduction in branch activity was observed (Fig. 7d). FLP-11 neuropeptides may directly or indirectly provide positive feedback to RIS during reversals.
Neuronal circuits regulate and fine-tune locomotion. While in mammals this is orchestrated by whole-brain systems like motor and prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, and spinal cord neurons, much fewer neurons must fulfill these tasks in compressed nervous systems. Here we analyzed the role of one neuron, RIS, which orchestrates locomotion slowing and reversals in C. elegans. RIS does this by re-employing a peptidergic pathway used in sleep control, e.g., after larval molts or in response to stress. Here RIS uses also GABAergic signaling, not required during DTS induction26. During optogenetic stimulation, GABAergic signaling from RIS induces the locomotion stop within seconds, possibly by inhibiting RIB neurons48 (Supplementary Fig. 3B, C), and sustains it by FLP-11 signaling (Fig. 8a). The observed axonal compartmentalization of Ca2+ dynamics during locomotion (Fig. 8b) jointly with the requirement of peptidergic and GABAergic signaling suggest that RIS uses both modalities in a spatiotemporally defined manner to control locomotion. RIS’ role in both locomotion and sleep control represent two types of temporally different activity: (1) where RIS is employed to control locomotion with brief activity bouts (seconds), in coordination with other locomotion neurons, and (2) where DTS and SIS involve long-term RIS activity (minutes to hours), together with the sleep neuron ALA22.
RIS depolarization in the nerve ring results in fast GABA- and FLP-11 neuropeptide-mediated inhibition of neuronal activity and locomotion. Suppression of branch depolarization is permissive for locomotion halting, and conversely, if the RIS axon is not hyperpolarized in the branch before depolarization in the nerve ring, the most likely behavioral outcome is a reversal. This coincides with optogenetic experiments where RIS depolarization led to reversals and required both GABA and FLP-11 release. These transmitter(s) dampened cholinergic MN oscillations and desynchronized acetylcholine release, thus suppressing oscillations of body muscle activity. Occasionally reversals occurred also without RIS activity or in the absence of FLP-11. Thus RIS is sufficient but not essential for reversals and must act in coordination with other neurons. Roberts et al.38 described a four-state model of C. elegans locomotion, where forward–reverse and vice versa transitions were connected by brief pause states. RIS may induce this brief stop. Hints of this are found in our analyses, e.g., pause events at seconds 13, 44, and 56 in Fig. 5c, accompanied by RIS Ca2+ peaks. Also, in analyses of mean Ca2+ events, a brief phase of zero acceleration followed the moment of maximal slowing (Supplementary Fig. 6C).
The functional compartmentalization of the RIS axon indicated that the branch is instructive for reversal onset. Since the effects of RIS activation are rather fast and the RIS axon extends only in the nerve ring, the targets of transmitters released by RIS are likely in the head ganglia. RIS synaptic output and input segregate between its nerve ring and branch regions49, with the branch being mainly postsynaptic, and the nerve ring process being dominated by output synapses. The branch connects to only three neuron types: AVJ, PVC, and SMD. SMD neurons are part of the network encoding the amplitude of Ω-turns (named after the body posture adopted transiently during turning)60. No behavior was yet associated with AVJ, while PVC is a PIN inducing forward movement61. In the locomotion state model38, PVC and AVE drive forward and backward locomotion, respectively. PVC innervates RIS and RIS has synaptic output to AVE49, implying a possible sequence of signaling leading from forward (PVC) to a pause (RIS), e.g. mediated by GABA inhibition of the speed neuron RIB, and transition to a reversal, by gap junctions to AIB and possibly by activating AVE (the latter would imply, however, an excitatory connection, possibly through excitatory GABA receptors (like the EXP-1 channel involved in control of the defecation motor program62). However, such speculative models will have to be clarified in animals lacking such receptors cell-specifically. During pure slowing events, branch Ca2+ activity was suppressed prior to RIS activation. PVC activity, which may inhibit RIS (e.g., via muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, as PVC is cholinergic), could alter RIS output such that the evoked behavior is a stop instead of a reversal. Lack of FLP-11 neuropeptides uncoupled reversals from RIS Ca2+ activity and was permissive for reversal induction during RIS photoactivation. This suggests that RIS contributes to coordinating reversals by controlling the halt duration and that it uses FLP-11 peptides for this purpose.
The kinetics of RIS::ChR2-elicited behaviors may be due to the different diffusion properties of GABA and FLP-11 neuropeptides (GABA is much smaller than FLP-11 neuropeptides). GABA was required for fast slowing within 1 s, while FLP-11 sustained the locomotion stop. RIS::ChR2 depolarization in WT animals increased reversal probability at the stimulus off-set, while flp-11 mutants increased their reversal probability already during the photostimulation period. Hence, FLP-11 is required to maintain behavior inhibition during RIS activity. The requirement for GABA and FLP-11 signaling for fast induction of a stop and for its maintenance, respectively, is in line with activities of stop neurons in vertebrates in regulating locomotion inhibition and body posture8,10. In the mouse, behavior stop signals are not controlled by a single cell type in striatum63 but by the activity of stop neurons in the brainstem that project to the spinal cord and depress locomotor rhythm generation8,64. Similarly, RIS de-synchronized MN activity. Conservation of not only RIS and of FLP-11 neuropeptides in nematodes65 but also the neuropeptide VF (NPVF) in fish, which can suppress escape behaviors66, suggests that RIS acts as a stop neuron in parallel to/upstream of the ventral nerve cord CPG system17. A comparison among worm, fly, leech, tadpole, zebrafish, lamprey, and mouse (Fig. 8c) of stop and sleep neurons may suggest that, in compact brains like C. elegans, both activities are coalescing in one neuron type, RIS, which effects locomotion stop during brief activity and sleep during prolonged activity. In more complex brains, such functions dissociate into different systems, distinct for sleep control and locomotion stop, which reside in different cell types (molecular identities still need to be determined for most systems) and brain structures, and use different mechanisms. Here more elaborate control regimes have evolved, where sleep neurons induce relaxation, while stop neurons halt locomotion but do not relax muscle. RIS makes this distinction by brief and short signaling via the same molecules. RIS may thus represent a primordial neuronal pathway, e.g., for fast sensory integration, and may have evolved to more finely tuned stop neurons in vertebrates.
pCoS6 (pglr-1::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP) was a gift from Cornelia Schmitt67. The following plasmids were kindly provided by Navin Pokala (Bargmann lab, Rockefeller University, USA): pNP165 (pSM::pglr-1::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry), pNP260 (pSM::pnmr1::flox::ChR2::STAR::mCherry), and pNP259 (pSM::pgpa-14::Cre). pPD95.79 was a gift from Andrew Fire (Addgene plasmid # 1496; RRID:Addgene_1496). pOT15 (QUAS::jRCaMP1b), pOT6 (punc-17::QF), and pOT7 (punc-4::QS::mCherry) were provided by Oleg Tolstenkov18. We used the plasmid pmyo-3::RCaMP1h for RCaMP expression in BWM cells43. pmyo-2::GCaMP3 was kindly provided by Karen Erbguth. pGP (pmec-4::GCaMP6::SL2::TagRFP) was kindly provided by Douglas S. Kim. pCG02 (pggr-2::GCaMP6s::SL2::RFP): pGP backbone was ligated to the pggr-2 sequence from pWSC28, both cut with SphI and Not-I-HF. pCG03 (pggr-2::flox::GCaMP6s::SL2::RFP): pCG02 was linearized with SacII and ligated to the PCR product of pWSC24 with forward primer oCG11 (AAAGAATTCGGTACCGATAACTTCGTATAGCATACA) and reverse primer oCG12 (TGGCGCGCCGGGCCCGATAACTTCGTATAATGTATGC). pWSC05 (pnpr-9): pPD95.79 was cut with SalI and PstI and ligated to a PCR product of pnpr-9 from N2 genomic DNA (forward primer, oWSC09: AGACTGCAGCGTCAAATGGAAAGGTTCGCGCAT, reverse primer, oWSC10: GTCGACTTCTACGACATTTCCCAGGAAGTAGCTCTAA), cut with PstI and SalI. A nested PCR protocol was run for the promoter fragment with the following outer primers: forward, oWSC13: ACGGAATGTGTCTGCAAAAGAAACGG, reverse, oWSC14: ACATTTCCCAACGACATTTCCCAGG. pWSC15 (pggr-1::GFP): pWSC05 was cut with SalI and HindIII and ligated to a PCR product of pgrr-1 from N2 genomic DNA (forward primer, oWSC37: GAAATGAAATAAGCTTAGGCAACCGTGTGCTCTGGC, reverse primer, oWSC38: ATCCTCTAGAGTCGACTCAATAATTAAAGTATGCAGTTGA), cut with HindIII and SalI. A nested PCR protocol was run for the promoter fragment with the following outer primers: forward, oWSC42: AGTGGGGTAAAGCTTGTCCTAGGC, reverse, oWSC43: TCTGCCTGACCCAGGACGCA. pWSC17 (pggr-2::GFP): pWSC05 was cut with SalI and SphI and ligated to a PCR product of pgrr-2 from N2 genomic DNA (forward primer, oWSC40: AATGAAATAAGCTTGCATGCTCTTCCGGCAGATGCGCTGTT, reverse primer, oWSC41: ATCCTCTAGAGTCGACGCCGTCGTGGTAAGACGTTATAGTT), cut with SphI and SalI. A nested PCR protocol was run for the promoter fragment with the following outer primers: forward, oWSC44: TCTCTCCGCGCTGACCAAGT, reverse, oWSC45: TGGCACCGGTTCGCTCCTACT. pWSC19 (pggr-1::Cre): pNP259 was cut with KpnI and HindIII and ligated to pWSC15, cut with HindIII and KpnI. pWSC20 (pggr-1::mCherry): pWSC15 was cut with HindIII and SalI and ligated to pNP165, cut with XhoI and HindIII. pWSC24 (pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP): pCoS6 was cut with SalI and SphI and ligated to pWSC17, cut with SphI and SalI. pWSC28 (pggr-2::GCaMP3) pmyo-2::GCaMP3 was cut with MscI and SphI and ligated to the fragment of pWSC17, cut with SphI and MscI.
Reagents are available upon request.
PCR for pharyngeal terminal bulb marker
The red fluorescent mCherry marker in the pharyngeal bulb of the pharynx (driven by the pncx-10 promoter), used for tracking of the region containing RIS, was injected as a linear DNA construct, generated by fusion PCR with these primers: A (GTTCTTTCAACATTGCAAAAAGGCACCA), A’ (TACACAGTTGCAGAGGCGTTTAATCAGA), B (ATCTTCTTCACCCTTTGAGACCATTACCTGAAAAAGAAACAGTTGATAAGCGGGT), C (ATGGTCTCAAAGGGTGAAG), D (ACGACGGCCAGTGAATTATC), D’ (GGAAACAGTTATGTTTGGTATATTGGG).
C. elegans cultivation and transgenesis
C. elegans WT (N2, Bristol strain) and transgenic animals were cultivated on either nematode growth medium (NGM) or high growth medium plates seeded with Escherichia coli OP-50-1 strain. We noted that, at elevated temperature of 25 °C, conditional transgene expression for RIS was observed also in additional, unwanted neurons, thus we kept animals (including larval stages) at 20 °C at all times. In addition, 100 µM ATR (Sigma-Aldrich) were supplemented to E. coli prior to seeding for optogenetic experiments40. Transgenic animals were generated following standard protocols. Extra-chromosomal array integration was performed by ultraviolet exposure following standard protocols.
C. elegans strains
The following strains were used or generated for this study: N2 (WT isolate, Bristol strain), HBR1777: goeIs384[pflp-11::egl-1::SL2-mkate2-flp-11-3’utr, unc-119( + )]22, ZX1466: lite-1(ce314)X; zxIs55[pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; pggr-1::Cre], ZX1468: unc-47(e307)III; lite-1(ce314)X; zxIs55[pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; pggr-1::Cre], ZX1469: unc-31(n1304)IV; lite-1(ce314)X; zxIs55[pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; pggr-1::Cre], ZX1470: lite-1(ce314)X; zxIs55[pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; pggr-1::Cre; pmyo-2::mCherry]; zxIs52[pmyo-3::RCaMP], ZX1561: zxIs55[pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; pggr-1::Cre], ZX1577: lite-1(ce314)X; zxEx360[pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; pggr-1::Cre], ZX1891: egl-3(gk238)X; lite-1(ce314)X; zxEx360[pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; pggr-1::Cre], ZX2017: zxIs60[pggr-2::flox::GCaMP6s::SL2::tagRFP; pggr-1::nCre]; zxEx378[pncx-10::mCherry], ZX2099: flp-11(tm2706)X; lite-1(ce314)X; zxEx360[pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; pggr-1::Cre], ZX2140: unc-47(e307)III; flp-11(tm2706)X; lite-1(ce314)X; zxEx360[pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; pggr-1::Cre], ZX2223: flp-11(tm2706)X; zxEx1173[pggr-2::flox::GCaMP6s::SL2::tagRFP; pggr-1::nCre; pncx-10::mCherry], ZX2297: lite-1(ce314)X; zxEx371[pggr-1::Cre, pggr-2::flox::ChR2(H134R)::mCherry::SL2::GFP; QUAS::jRCaMP1b; punc-17::QF; punc-4::QS].
Optogenetic stimulation and behavioral analysis
Locomotion parameters of freely moving animals were measured with a single worm tracking and illumination device described earlier68. This tracking set-up enabled accurately targeted illumination to specific body segments by a modified liquid crystal display projector, integrated with an inverted epifluorescence microscope. For optogenetics experiments, animals were cultivated in the dark on NGM plates with E. coli OP50-1 and ATR. NGM plates were freshly seeded a day in advance with 250 µl of OP50 bacterial culture supplemented with ATR dissolved in 100% ethanol to a final concentration of 100 µM. Five minutes prior to analysis, young adult animals were gently picked with an eyelash to unseeded NGM plates under dim red light (>600 nm) and maintained in the dark. Blue light of 470 nm and 1.8 mW/mm2 intensity was used to stimulate ChR2 expressed in RIS. Light power quantification was performed with a power meter (PM100, Thorlabs, Newton, NY, USA) at the sample focal plane. All optogenetic experiments followed the same illumination protocol: 10 s tracking and behavioral acquisition (without blue light), subsequently 10 s targeted blue light illumination, followed by another 10 s of tracking without blue illumination. Only the anterior half of the animal was illuminated. Tracks were quality controlled by censoring data points from erroneously evaluated video frames. Briefly, a specialized workflow in KNIME (KNIME Desktop version 3.5, KNIME.com AG, Zurich, Switzerland) allowed data that passed the constraints (animals’ speed <1.25 mm/s and length deviation <25%, relative to the first 5 s of acquisition). Animals with >15% of the data points censored were excluded from analysis.
Anterior and posterior body length analysis
Single animals were picked onto the center of an unseeded NGM plate and a small spot of ink was painted with an eyelash on the cuticle of the worm, about 1/3 of the length of the animal relative to the head. Worms were recorded during unrestrained locomotion, using a ×10 objective on an Axio Scope A1 (Zeiss). Videos were acquired by a DCC1545M camera (Thorlabs) with 3 s pre-stimulation, 5 s 470 nm at 0.9 mW/mm² RIS photoactivation and 3 s post-stimulation. Analysis was performed in ImageJ, blind to condition, where three frames were manually annotated: one frame before photostimulation, one in the middle of the 5 s photostimulation period, and the last frame of post-stimulation. Two splines were tagged to the center line of the animal, ranging from the head or tail to the ink dot. The length of the dot was also quantified, as well as the length from head to tail. The relative elongation of the head, tail, and full-body splines were calculated in reference to the data before RIS photostimulation.
Ca2+ imaging microscope setup
An inverted fluorescence microscope (Axiovert 200, Zeiss, Germany) equipped with an MS 2000 motorized stage and PhotoTrack quadrant photomultiplier tube (both Applied Scientific Instrumentation, USA) was utilized for Ca2+ imaging, similar to a system described earlier. As excitation light sources, two high-power light-emitting diodes (LEDs; 470 and 590 nm wavelength, KSL 70, Rapp Optoelektronik, Germany) or a 100 W HBO mercury lamp were used. Simultaneous dual-wavelength acquisition was enabled by a Photometrics DualView-Λ beam splitter in combination with a Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4.0 sCMOS camera controlled by HCImage Live (Hamamatsu) or MicroManager (version 1.4.13; http://micro-manager.org) software.
Ca2+ imaging in immobilized worms
Animals were immobilized on 10% M9 agar pads with polystyrene beads (Polysciences, USA) and imaged either by ×25 (BWM) or ×40 (nerve ring) oil objective lenses. The following light filter settings were used: GFP/mCherry Dualband ET Filterset (F56-019, AHF Analysentechnik, Germany) was combined with 532/18 nm and 625/15 nm emission filters and a 565 long-pass beam splitter (F39-833, F39-624, and F48-567, respectively, all AHF). ChR2 stimulation was performed using 1 mW/mm2 blue light. To measure RCaMP fluorescence, 590 nm, 0.6 mW/mm2 yellow light was used. The 4 × 4 binned images were acquired at 31 ms exposure time and 20 fps. Light illumination protocols were generated by a Lambda SC Smart shutter controller unit (Sutter Instruments, USA), using its TTL output to drive the LED power supply or to open a shutter when using the HBO lamp. Video synchronization was achieved by cropping the acquisition to obtain equally sized time bins before, during, and after blue light exposure. Image analysis was performed in ImageJ (NIH), called by a custom KNIME workflow, after manual annotation of ROIs. Spline ROIs were selected for the BWM cells or ventral nerve cord to nerve ring region and the kymographs were generated by averaging a 7 × 7 × 7 moving voxel (where time is the third dimension) across the ROI. A ventral and a dorsal BWM ROI were defined, and their periodicity data were averaged for the analysis of a single animal. Additionally, an elliptic ROI was selected for background fluorescence exclusion. Mean intensity values for each video frame were obtained and background fluorescence values were subtracted from the fluorescence values derived for RCaMP. Subtracted data were normalized to ΔF/F0 = (Fi − F0)/F0, where Fi represents the intensity at the given time point and F0 represents the average fluorescence of the first second of the acquisition.
Signal autocorrelation analysis
Since spontaneous activity was not synchronized between animals, we introduced the metric of signal autocorrelation for calcium imaging as a means of describing perturbations in the Ca2+ dynamics of both BWM and neurons. We observed that Ca2+ dynamics in undisturbed animals were periodic, albeit without a fixed frequency. This periodicity could be obtained by analyzing the signal correlation to itself, where peaks in the autocorrelation function were indicative of the period of Ca2+ dynamics. This was performed by a custom script in R called by a KNIME workflow. The R script calculated the autocorrelation of a smooth spline fit of the ΔF/F0 signal and searched for its peaks in window of 20 s of data to calculate the period of the autocorrelation. If no period could be found, it was set as the maximum of 1 in every 20 s. Hence, this function returned the period lower bound where confidence in the result can be guaranteed. Note that for the autocorrelation analysis only the signal differences over time, and not the absolute values, are taken into account. Thus, this analysis does not require prior signal normalization.
Axonal Ca2+ imaging of RIS in moving animals
For measuring spontaneous Ca2+ activity, a tracking system for single neuron Ca2+ imaging in moving animals59 was modified to allow axonal visualization with an improved temporal accuracy and signal-to-noise ratio. Animals expressing a GCaMP6 indicator exclusively in RIS were imaged for 60 s while moving undisturbed on transparent 1.5% agar pads in M9 buffer. A ×25/0.6 NeoFluar long-range air objective (Zeiss, Germany) was used to visualize the RIS neuron. Fluorescent measurements of GCaMP6 and mCherry were enabled using a GFP/mCherry Dualband ET Filterset (F56-019, AHF Analysentechnik, Germany), combined with 532/18 nm and 625/15 nm emission filters and a 565 long-pass beam splitter (F39-833, F39-624, and F48-567, respectively, all AHF). Tracking the animal’s head was established by the PhotoTrack system (Applied Scientific Instrumentation, USA) that automatically repositions the motorized XY stage to keep a bright fluorescent marker in center of the field of view (FOV). By keeping the relative signal strength from each of the four sensors in a four-quadrant photomultiplier tube (PMT) equal, via an analog system, millisecond precision is achieved59. An oblique 625 short-pass beam splitter (F38-625, AHF) was inserted in the light path to divert the long red wavelengths to the PMT. Pncx-10::mCherry was expressed in the terminal pharyngeal bulb to allow for robust tracking. To exclude longer wavelengths necessary for behavioral analysis, a 615/20 bandpass filter (F39-616, AHF) was also added in the light path to the PMT, thus improving tracking performance. Behavioral images to deduce the animals’ body shape and orientation were obtained under far red illumination with a far-red 740 nm LED filtered with a 690/50 bandpass filter (F47-690, AHF) and magnified with a ×4/0.1 long range objective positioned above the sample, optimized with an additional ×0.5 demagnification tube lens. Data were acquired through the transparent agarose pad with a DCC1545M USB CCD camera (Thorlabs, Newton, NY, USA) controlled via the uc480 ThorCam Software on a separate PC. To exclude the bright blue and yellow excitation light (necessary for calcium imaging), a 610–675 nm bandpass filter was added in the behavioral acquisition light path. Synchronization of both camera’s running with 30 ms exposure time and the stage position reporting was done with a TTL start and stop trigger pulse sent by a Lambda SC Smart shutter controller unit (Sutter Instruments, USA). The synchronized combined data of 60 s acquisitions enable behavioral quantification of parameters such as speed, velocity, and acceleration along the midbody axis. This axis was determined by the pharyngeal bulb (kept in the center of the FOV of the behavioral camera due to tracking) and the centroid of the animal’s body shape. Prior to differentiation, the stage coordinates of the fluorescent pharyngeal bulb in the moving head were corrected by the deviation of body centroid of the complete animal. The normalized velocity or speed in Fig. 6b, f and Supplementary Fig. 5 were calculated by pairwise subtracting the mean values of the corresponding time periods for individual animals and dividing this by the average speed over the full 60 s acquisition of that animal.
Video files containing data of both fluorescent channels (for GCaMP6 and mCherry) were processed with custom written Mathematica notebooks (Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL, USA) as also depicted in Fig. 5b and Supplementary Movie S5. Green and red fluorescent channels were digitally overlaid to accurately correct the spatial alignment. As the structure tracked was not the cell body of RIS but the pharyngeal terminal bulb of a moving animal, the RIS neuron image rotates around the center of the image. A data analysis pipeline was programmed to allow parallelized processing of multiple videos. First, the green fluorescent channel was cropped to around the respective position of the pharyngeal bulb. Next, images were thresholded to locate the centroid of the moving neuronal cell bodies in every frame of the video. The cell body was then repositioned to overlay its position in all frames and rotated after measuring the angular orientation to horizontal of both gut autofluorescence and the brightest regions of the axon (by binarizing a smaller ROI after masking the gut). Subsequently, also the dorso-ventral axis was determined. In this way, an ROI containing the entire RIS morphology was cropped and rotated in each image such that the axon is always oriented in the same direction. At last, a parabola was fitted through the neuronally shaped image components. Alongside this parabola, about 25 equally spaced points were determined to generate rectangular ROIs perpendicular to it. Mean fluorescent intensity was measured in these sub-ROIs (5 × 25 pixels) and subtracted by the median intensity of two adjacent smaller regions above and below each of these (3 × 5 pixels) to correct for local differences in background along the axon. Finally, these values were resampled to 100 values representing the percentagewise segments along the axon to correct for stretching of the axon. The ΔF/F traces in Fig. 5c, d are the mean values of the 50 most anterior segments of RIS covering the nerve ring region represented as ΔF/F = (Fi − Fmean)/Fmean, where Fmean is the mean fluorescent intensity during the first 2 s of acquisition. Fluorescent heatmaps in Fig. 5c, d display min–max normalized values (for each segment of each video normalized over time by Fnorm,i = (Fi − Fmin)/(Fmin − Fmax) to account for variation in the mean intensity of each segment) that are smoothed over four frames with a mean filter. Figure 5e displays the mean of 45 aligned normalized fluorescence time windows 6 s prior and post manually assigned Ca2+ peak events. The normalized fluorescent traces in Fig. 6b, f are the means ± SEM of event-aligned 6 s time windows of min–max normalized traces that consist of the mean fluorescence intensity of the 50 nerve ring segments.
Calcium dynamics to behavior correlation analysis
Conditional probability density functions (in Fig. 6a, e) of the shortest unbiased time lag to either a reversal or a given Ca2+ peak event or vice versa were found by Gaussian kernel density estimation with bandwidth 1 s and aligned to the conditional event (Ca2+ peak or reversal respectively). Cross-correlation analyses (Fig. 6c, g) were performed in Mathematica by calculating Pearson’s correlation functions for equally sized 6 s time windows of both normalized fluorescent change and acceleration time shifted up to 3 s time lags.
Recordings from dissected BWM cells anterior to the vulva at the ventral side are described in ref. 40. Light activation was performed using an LED lamp (KSL-70, Rapp OptoElectronic, Hamburg, Germany; 470 nm, 8 mW/mm²) and controlled by an EPC10 amplifier and Patchmaster software (HEKA, Germany). mPSC analysis was done by the Mini Analysis software (Synaptosoft, Decatur, GA, USA, version 6.0.7). Amplitude and mean number of mPSC events per second were analyzed for each 10 s before, 10 s during, and 10 s after illumination.
EPG recording was performed as previously described69. Animals were selected on the day prior to measurement as L4 larvae. The head was cut away from the body with a scalpel at about one third to half of the body length. The tip of the worm head was sucked under 100-fold magnification into an EPG-suction electrode, connected via a silver chloride-coated silver wire to an EPC-10 amplifier (Heka, Germany). Prior to measurement, the preparation was incubated in 2 µM serotonin for 5 min to induce pharyngeal pumping. EPG recordings were performed by the PatchMaster software (Heka). We recorded spontaneous pumping for 30 s prior to 30 s of RIS::ChR2 depolarization via 3 mW/mm2 (470 nm) light and further 30 s post stimulus. We used the Review software (Bruxton Corporation, USA) to convert from PatchMaster to ABF files. Pump rate and duration were analyzed by AutoEPG58 (kindly provided by C. James, Embody Biosignals Ltd., UK).
Statistical analysis was performed in Prism (Version 5.01, GraphPad Software, Inc.), Mathematica (version 10, Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL, USA), OriginPro 2015G (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, USA), R (version 3.3.2), the latter called by RStudio (version 1.0.136, RStudio, Inc.), or KNIME (Desktop version 3.5, KNIME.com AG, Zurich, Switzerland). No statistical methods were applied to predetermine sample size. However, sample sizes reported here are consistent to data presented in previous publications. Data were tested for normality prior to statistical inference. Data are given as means ± SEM when not otherwise stated. Significance between data sets after paired or two-tailed Student’s t test is given as p value (*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001), when not otherwise stated. For other statistical tests used, see figure legends.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
All data are provided as Supplementary Information. Reagents and code are available upon request.
Codes are available upon request.
Vetrivelan, R., Chang, C. & Lu, J. Muscle tone regulation during REM sleep: neural circuitry and clinical significance. Arch. Ital. Biol. 149, 348–366 (2011).
Clément, O. et al. The lateral hypothalamic area controls paradoxical (REM) sleep by means of descending projections to brainstem GABAergic neurons. J. Neurosci. 32, 16763–16774 (2012).
Kiehn, O. Development and functional organization of spinal locomotor circuits. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 100–109 (2011).
Talpalar, A. E. et al. Dual-mode operation of neuronal networks involved in left-right alternation. Nature 500, 85–88 (2013).
Kiehn, O. Decoding the organization of spinal circuits that control locomotion. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 224–238 (2016).
Caggiano, V. et al. Midbrain circuits that set locomotor speed and gait selection. Nature 553, 455–460 (2018).
Li, W. C., Roberts, A. & Soffe, S. R. Locomotor rhythm maintenance: electrical coupling among premotor excitatory interneurons in the brainstem and spinal cord of young Xenopus tadpoles. J. Physiol. 587, 1677–1693 (2009).
Bouvier, J. et al. Descending command neurons in the brainstem that halt locomotion. Cell 163, 1191–1203 (2015).
Ampatzis, K., Song, J., Ausborn, J. & El Manira, A. Separate microcircuit modules of distinct V2a interneurons and motoneurons control the speed of locomotion. Neuron 83, 934–943 (2014).
Juvin, L. et al. A specific population of reticulospinal neurons controls the termination of locomotion. Cell Rep. 15, 2377–2386 (2016).
Tastekin, I. et al. Sensorimotor pathway controlling stopping behavior during chemotaxis in the Drosophila melanogaster larva. eLife 7, e38740 (2018).
Cande, J. et al. Optogenetic dissection of descending behavioral control in Drosophila. eLife 7, e34275 (2018).
Ritson, E. J. & Li, W.-C. The neuronal mechanisms underlying locomotion termination. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 8, 109–115 (2019).
Fouad, A. D. et al. Distributed rhythm generators underlie Caenorhabditis elegans forward locomotion. eLife 7, e29913 (2018).
Gao, S. et al. Excitatory motor neurons are local oscillators for backward locomotion. eLife 7, e29915 (2018).
Xu, T. et al. Descending pathway facilitates undulatory wave propagation in Caenorhabditis elegans through gap junctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4493–E4502 (2018).
Wen, Q., Gao, S. & Zhen, M. Caenorhabditis elegans excitatory ventral cord motor neurons derive rhythm for body undulation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170370 (2018).
Tolstenkov, O. et al. Functionally asymmetric motor neurons contribute to coordinating locomotion of Caenorhabditis elegans. eLife 7, e34997 (2018).
Luppi, P. H. et al. The neuronal network responsible for paradoxical sleep and its dysfunctions causing narcolepsy and rapid eye movement (REM) behavior disorder. Sleep Med. Rev. 15, 153–163 (2011).
Raizen, D. M. et al. Lethargus is a Caenorhabditis elegans sleep-like state. Nature 451, 569–572 (2008).
Hill, A. J., Mansfield, R., JMNG, Lopez, Raizen, D. M. & van Buskirk, C. Cellular stress induces a protective sleep-like state in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 24, 2399–2405 (2014).
Wu, Y., Masurat, F., Preis, J. & Bringmann, H. Sleep counteracts aging phenotypes to survive starvation-induced developmental arrest in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 28, 3610–3624 (2018).
Nath, R. D., Chow, E. S., Wang, H., Schwarz, E. M. & Sternberg, P. W. C. elegans stress-induced sleep emerges from the collective action of multiple neuropeptides. Curr. Biol. 26, 2446–2455 (2016).
Nelson, M. D. et al. The neuropeptide NLP-22 regulates a sleep-like state in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Commun. 4, 2846 (2013).
Turek, M., Lewandrowski, I. & Bringmann, H. An AP2 transcription factor is required for a sleep-active neuron to induce sleep-like quiescence in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 23, 2215–2223 (2013).
Turek, M., Besseling, J., Spies, J. P., Konig, S. & Bringmann, H. Sleep-active neuron specification and sleep induction require FLP-11 neuropeptides to systemically induce sleep. eLife 5, e12499 (2016).
Yew, J. Y. et al. Peptide products of the afp-6 gene of the nematode Ascaris suum have different biological actions. J. Comp. Neurol. 502, 872–882 (2007).
Appelbaum, L. et al. Sleep-wake regulation and hypocretin-melatonin interaction in zebrafish. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21942–21947 (2009).
Saper, C. B., Chou, T. C. & Scammell, T. E. The sleep switch: hypothalamic control of sleep and wakefulness. Trends Neurosci. 24, 726–731 (2001).
Lin, L. et al. The sleep disorder canine narcolepsy is caused by a mutation in the hypocretin (orexin) receptor 2 gene. Cell 98, 365–376 (1999).
Caers, J. et al. More than two decades of research on insect neuropeptide GPCRs: an overview. Front. Endocrinol. 3, 151 (2012).
Choi, S., Chatzigeorgiou, M., Taylor, K. P., Schafer, W. R. & Kaplan, J. M. Analysis of NPR-1 reveals a circuit mechanism for behavioral quiescence in C. elegans. Neuron 78, 869–880 (2013).
Chen, D., Taylor, K. P., Hall, Q. & Kaplan, J. M. The neuropeptides FLP-2 and PDF-1 act in concert to arouse Caenorhabditis elegans locomotion. Genetics 204, 1151–1159 (2016).
Chew, Y. L. et al. An afferent neuropeptide system transmits mechanosensory signals triggering sensitization and arousal in C. elegans. Neuron 99, 1233–1246.e1236 (2018).
You, Y.-J. et al. Insulin, cGMP, and TGF-beta signals regulate food intake and quiescence in C. elegans: a model for satiety. Cell Metab. 7, 249–257 (2008).
Pierce-Shimomura, J. T., Morse, T. M. & Lockery, S. R. The fundamental role of pirouettes in Caenorhabditis elegans chemotaxis. J. Neurosci. 19, 9557–9569 (1999).
Donnelly, J. L. et al. Monoaminergic orchestration of motor programs in a complex C. elegans behavior. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001529 (2013).
Roberts, W. M. et al. A stochastic neuronal model predicts random search behaviors at multiple spatial scales in C. elegans. eLife 5, e12572 (2016).
Stephens, G. J., Johnson-Kerner, B., Bialek, W. & Ryu, W. S. Dimensionality and dynamics in the behavior of C. elegans. PLoS Comput Biol. 4, e1000028 (2008).
Liewald, J. F. et al. Optogenetic analysis of synaptic function. Nat. Methods 5, 895–902 (2008).
Spies, J. & Bringmann, H. Automated detection and manipulation of sleep in C. elegans reveals depolarization of a sleep-active neuron during mechanical stimulation-induced sleep deprivation. Sci. Rep. 8, 9732 (2018).
Raizen, D. M. & Avery, L. Electrical activity and behavior in the pharynx of C. elegans. Neuron 12, 483–495 (1994).
Akerboom, J. et al. Genetically encoded calcium indicators for multi-color neural activity imaging and combination with optogenetics. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 6, 2 (2013).
Fang-Yen, C., Wasserman, S. M., Sengupta, P. & Samuel, A. D. T. Agarose immobilization of C. elegans. Worm Breeder’s Gazette (2009). http://wbg.wormbook.org/2009/12/01/agarose-immobilization-of-c-elegans/.
Wen, Q. et al. Proprioceptive coupling within motor neurons drives C. elegans forward locomotion. Neuron 76, 750–761 (2012).
Karbowski, J. et al. Conservation rules, their breakdown, and optimality in Caenorhabditis sinusoidal locomotion. J. Theor. Biol. 242, 652–669 (2006).
Prevedel, R. et al. Simultaneous whole-animal 3D imaging of neuronal activity using light-field microscopy. Nat. Methods 11, 727–730 (2014).
Li, Z., Liu, J., Zheng, M. & Xu, X. Z. Encoding of both analog- and digital-like behavioral outputs by one C. elegans interneuron. Cell 159, 751–765 (2014).
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N. & Brenner, S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 314, 1–340 (1986).
Altun, Z. F., Chen, B. J., Wang, Z. W. & Hall, D. H. High resolution map of Caenorhabditis elegans gap junction. Proteins Dev. Dynam. 238, 1936–1950 (2009).
Starich, T. A., Xu, J., Skerrett, I. M., Nicholson, B. J. & Shaw, J. E. Interactions between innexins UNC-7 and UNC-9 mediate electrical synapse specificity in the Caenorhabditis elegans locomotory nervous system. Neural Dev. 4, 16 (2009).
Bhattacharya, A., Aghayeva, U., Berghoff, E. G. & Hobert, O. Plasticity of the electrical connectome of C. elegans. Cell 176, 1174–1189 e1116 (2019).
Alkema, M. J., Hunter-Ensor, M., Ringstad, N. & Horvitz, H. R. Tyramine functions independently of octopamine in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. Neuron 46, 247–260 (2005).
Piggott, B. J., Liu, J., Feng, Z., Wescott, S. A. & Xu, X. Z. S. The neural circuits and synaptic mechanisms underlying motor initiation in C. elegans. Cell 147, 922–933 (2011).
Pirri, J. K., McPherson, A. D., Donnelly, J. L., Francis, M. M. & Alkema, M. J. A tyramine-gated chloride channel coordinates distinct motor programs of a Caenorhabditis elegans escape response. Neuron 62, 526–538 (2009).
Gordus, A., Pokala, N., Levy, S., Flavell, S. W. & Bargmann, C. I. Feedback from network states generates variability in a probabilistic olfactory circuit. Cell 161, 215–227 (2015).
Husson, S. J., Clynen, E., Baggerman, G., Janssen, T. & Schoofs, L. Defective processing of neuropeptide precursors in Caenorhabditis elegans lacking proprotein convertase 2 (KPC-2/EGL-3): mutant analysis by mass spectrometry. J. Neurochem 98, 1999–2012 (2006).
Sieburth, D., Madison, J. M. & Kaplan, J. M. PKC-1 regulates secretion of neuropeptides. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 49–57 (2007).
Faumont, S. et al. An image-free opto-mechanical system for creating virtual environments and imaging neuronal activity in freely moving Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 6, e24666 (2011).
Gray, J. M., Hill, J. J. & Bargmann, C. I. A circuit for navigation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3184–3191 (2005).
Wicks, S. R. & Rankin, C. H. Integration of mechanosensory stimuli in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 15, 2434–2444 (1995).
Beg, A. A. & Jorgensen, E. M. EXP-1 is an excitatory GABA-gated cation channel. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 1145–1152 (2003).
Sales-Carbonell, C. et al. No discrete start/stop signals in the dorsal striatum of mice performing a learned action. Curr. Biol. 28, 3044–3055.e3045 (2018).
Ferreira-Pinto, M. J., Ruder, L., Capelli, P. & Arber, S. Connecting circuits for supraspinal control of locomotion. Neuron 100, 361–374 (2018).
Atkinson, L. E. et al. Unraveling flp-11/flp-32 dichotomy in nematodes. Int J. Parasitol. 46, 723–736 (2016).
Madelaine, R. et al. The hypothalamic NPVF circuit modulates ventral raphe activity during nociception. Sci. Rep. 7, 41528 (2017).
Schmitt, C. et al. Specific expression of channelrhodopsin-2 in single neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 7, e43164 (2012).
Stirman, J. N. et al. Real-time multimodal optical control of neurons and muscles in freely behaving Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Methods 8, 153–158 (2011).
Schuler, C., Fischer, E., Shaltiel, L., Steuer Costa, W. & Gottschalk, A. Arrhythmogenic effects of mutated L-type Ca(2+)-channels on an optogenetically paced muscular pump in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Rep. 5, 14427 (2015).
O’Gara, B. A. & Friesen, W. O. Termination of leech swimming activity by a previously identified swim trigger neuron. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177, 627–636 (1995).
Gratsch, S. et al. A brainstem neural substrate for stopping locomotion. J. Neurosci. 39, 1044–1057 (2019).
Capelli, P., Pivetta, C., Soledad Esposito, M. & Arber, S. Locomotor speed control circuits in the caudal brainstem. Nature 551, 373–377 (2017).
Bringmann, H. Sleep-active neurons: conserved motors of sleep. Genetics 208, 1279–1289 (2018).
We are grateful to N. Pokala, C. Bargmann, O. Tolstenkov, K. Erbguth, and D.S. Kim for reagents and to A. Hermann, J. Weil, L. Gottschlich, L. Anneser, M. Steiner, H. Fettermann, M. Höret, R. Wagner, K. Zehl, and F. Baumbach for expert technical assistance. We thank I. Beets, and members of the Gottschalk and Schoofs laboratories for discussion and comments on the manuscript. Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the NIH - Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (grant P40 OD010440) and the National Bioresource Project for the Experimental Animal “Nematode C. elegans”. This work was funded by Goethe University and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grants FOR1279 (GO1011/4-1, 4-2) and GO1011/13-1 to A.G. and EXC115 (Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt) to E.H.K.S. and A.G.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Michael Hendricks and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.