Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fully phase-stabilized quantum cascade laser frequency comb

Abstract

Miniaturized frequency comb sources across hard-to-access spectral regions, i.e. mid- and far-infrared, have long been sought. Four-wave-mixing based Quantum Cascade Laser combs (QCL-combs) are ideal candidates, in this respect, due to the unique possibility to tailor their spectral emission by proper nanoscale design of the quantum wells. We demonstrate full-phase-stabilization of a QCL-comb against the primary frequency standard, proving independent and simultaneous control of the two comb degrees of freedom (modes spacing and frequency offset) at a metrological level. Each emitted mode exhibits a sub-Hz relative frequency stability, while a correlation analysis on the modal phases confirms the high degree of coherence in the device emission, over different power-cycles and over different days. The achievement of fully controlled, phase-stabilized QCL-comb emitters proves that this technology is mature for metrological-grade uses, as well as for an increasing number of scientific and technological applications.

Introduction

Optical frequency comb synthesizers (FCs)1 are laser sources covering a broad spectral range with a number of discrete, equally spaced and highly coherent frequency components, fully controlled through only two parameters: the frequency separation between adjacent modes and the carrier offset frequency. Providing a phase-coherent link between the optical and the microwave/radio-frequency regions2, FCs have become groundbreaking tools for precision measurements3,4. Despite these inherent advantages, developing miniaturized comb sources across the whole infrared (IR), with an independent and simultaneous control of the two comb degrees of freedom at a metrological level, has not been possible, so far. Recently, promising results have been obtained with innovative sources, namely diode-laser-pumped microresonators5,6 and quantum cascade lasers frequency combs (QCL-combs). In particular, the latter can benefit from a smaller footprint electrical pumping scheme, combined with an ad-hoc tailoring of the spectral emission in the 3–250 µm range, by quantum engineering7. However, due to the QCL-combs active region structure, the short gain recovery time of the laser prevents stable pulse train formation8,9 and, therefore, classical pulsed passive mode locking has not been achieved, yet. Pulsed emission has been demonstrated via active mode-locking10,11, with pulse duration, in the best cases, of few picoseconds. An alternative route to QCL-based FCs, able to achieve a much broader spectral coverage, is based on four-wave-mixing (FWM) parametric generation in QCLs12,13. These combs, whose emission profile is not pulsed, are based on multimode-emitting, broad-gain Fabry–Pérot QCL devices with low group velocity dispersion.

Thorough characterizations of FWM-based QCL-combs, recently performed both in the mid-IR14,15 and in the far-IR15,16, have demonstrated that FWM is a strong mode-locking mechanism, providing tight phase relation among the modes simultaneously emitted by the devices. However, while QCL-based FCs have been already used in a variety of sensing setups, mostly related to dual-comb spectroscopy17,18, their relevance as metrological-grade, phase-stabilized sources has not been proven, yet. In fact, simultaneous stabilization of the two key comb degrees of freedom requires two suitable and independent actuators. Although reliable procedures for stabilizing the QCL-comb modes spacing12,19 or the frequency of a single mode20 have been reported, independent control and tuning of carrier offset and spacing, together with an effective overall phase stabilization has represented, for a long time, a non-trivial breakthrough.

Here, we demonstrate full stabilization and control of the two key parameters of a FWM-based QCL-comb against the primary frequency standard. Our technique, here applied to a far-IR emitter and open ended to other spectral windows, enables Hz-level narrowing of the individual comb modes, and metrological-grade tuning of their individual frequencies, which are simultaneously measured with an accuracy of 2 × 10−12, limited by the frequency reference used. These fully-controlled, frequency-scalable comb emitters will allow an increasing number of mid- and far-IR applications, including quantum technologies, due to the quantum nature of the gain media21.

Results

Experimental setup

A detailed description of the QCL used in the present work can be found in Methods section. The bias-dependent emission bandwidth displays a maximum frequency coverage of 1.3 THz22, and is centered at 2.9 THz. The mode spacing, defined by the cavity length, can be electrically extracted through the measurement of the intermode beat-note (IBN—fIBN ~ 17.45 GHz).

The experimental setup used for full stabilization and characterization of the QCL-comb is shown in Fig. 1a, and it is based on multi-heterodyne dual-comb detection. An amplified mode-locked Erbium-doped fiber fs-laser (Menlo Systems, model FC1500) is optically rectified in a single-mode Lithium Niobate waveguide23, providing a zero-offset free-standing THz frequency comb24,25 (OR-comb). The repetition rate (frep) of the pump laser can be tuned around 250 MHz, being the same for the generated THz OR-comb, while the average power of 350 mW at 1.55 μm generates an overall THz average power of about 14 μW. The QCL is mounted on the cold finger of a liquid Helium cryostat at a fixed heat sink temperature of 25 K, and it is driven in continuous-wave (CW) mode by an ultra-low noise current driver (ppqSense, QubeCL-P05) around 0.32 A. The OR-comb and the QCL-comb beams are overlapped by means of a wire grid polarizer (WGP) and generate the dual-comb multi-heterodyne signal on a fast non-linear detector, i.e. a hot electron bolometer (HEB—Scontel RS0.3-3T1). This frequency mixing results in a down-converted radio-frequency comb (RF-comb), which carries full information on the QCL-comb emission, and that allows its thorough characterization through Fourier-transform Analysis of Comb Emission (FACE) technique15.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Experimental set-up. a Schematics of the experimental setup employed for full stabilization, control and characterization of the QCL-comb. The beams of the OR-comb and QCL-comb are superimposed by means of a beam splitter (BS) and then mixed on a fast detector (HEB: hot-electron bolometer). The HEB signal is acquired on a spectrum analyzer (Tektronics RSA5106A) while the two stabilization loops act on the QCL bias. The yellow background object represents the RF synthesizer used for injection locking, while the pink background objects are related to offset stabilization through phase-lock loop (BP filter: band-pass filter, LO reference: local oscillator reference). All the oscillators and the spectrum analyzer are frequency-referenced to the primary frequency standard. b Phase-locked beat-note signal acquired with a 2 MHz span and 10 Hz RBW. The two sidebands indicate a phase-lock electronic bandwidth of 400 kHz

A frequency synthesizer, oscillating at a frequency close to the QCL cavity round trip time (around 17.45 GHz) is used for injection locking the QCL-comb spacing, while a phase-locked loop (PL-loop) circuit, on board the current driver, is used to stabilize the frequency of one down-converted mode against a local oscillator frequency around 180 MHz. The phase-lock loop has a 400 kHz electronic bandwidth and is capable of effectively concentrating the power of the QCL-comb mode within the OR-comb mode width (see Fig. 1b). The two signals are coupled to the QCL by a cryogenic bias-tee (Marki Microwave, mod. BT-0024SMG) placed on chip, very close to the QCL device. The synthesizer, the PL-loop local oscillator and the spectrum analyzer used for the acquisitions are tightly ruled by a GPS-Rb-quartz frequency reference chain.

Phase-locking the QCL-comb

Figure 2a shows the RF-comb spectrum of the free-running QCL-comb (blue trace) acquired by a real-time spectrum analyzer. The beat-notes (BNs) pattern distinctly retraces the QCL-comb Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum measured in air (Methods section). In these conditions, the emission linewidth of the OR-comb modes does not contribute to the BNs width, which shows a linear increase (about 14.4 kHz per mode) with the QCL-comb order N. This increment is close to the IBN width for a comparable acquisition time, confirming that the observed trend can be ascribed to frequency spacing fluctuations. In this scenario, a full active stabilization of the comb emission frequencies can be performed by means of two independent actuators.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Radio frequency (RF) spectra. RF-comb spectra (blue traces) and related width of each beat-note (red dots), the uncertainty bars have been calculated as standard deviation on a set of 20 acquisitions. In all the acquisitions the optically-rectified THz frequency comb is fully stabilized, while the QCL-comb is: a free-running; b stabilized mode spacing and free-running offset frequency; c free-running spacing and stabilized offset; d fully stabilized. The order N of each comb mode is labeled in d, N = 0 indicating the mode used for offset frequency stabilization

On one hand, the mode spacing of the QCL-comb can be stabilized through injection locking (Fig. 2b), by feeding to the QCL a radio-frequency signal (fRF) approaching the QCL cavity round-trip frequency (fIBN). When injection locking is active, the QCL-comb frequency spacing fluctuations are drastically reduced (Fig. 2b), while only the mode-independent offset-frequency fluctuations survive, as confirmed by the roughly constant width (120 kHz) of the BN signals (red dots).

On the other hand, any mode of the RF-comb can be singly stabilized to a reference oscillator (fLO), using a phase-lock loop (PL-loop) acting on the QCL driving current (Fig. 2c) (see Methods). In this case, in absence of any QCL-comb mode spacing stabilization, the BN linewidths linearly increase with the order N of the comb tooth, with a slope of about 66.5 kHz/mode, much larger than that retrieved in free running conditions (Fig. 2a). Indeed, the offset fluctuations of the stabilized mode propagate to the adjacent modes as spacing fluctuations. Consequently, a significant broadening is observed for the BNs distant from the stabilized mode.

Finally, simultaneous implementation of both these processes results in a full stabilization of the QCL-comb (shown in Fig. 2d), as confirmed by the linewidth of the acquired BN signals, that are all resolution bandwidth (RBW) limited. It is worth noting that both the stabilization signals are sent to the QCL-comb as electrical signals, acting on its voltage/current, over two well separated frequency ranges: the RF range for the 17.45 GHz signal that locks the mode spacing, and the DC/low frequency range for the PL-loop, with a 400 kHz bandwidth. Actually, this configuration only requires a RF source for mode spacing stabilization, and one single-frequency metrological-grade THz signal23,26,27, falling into the QCL-comb emission spectrum, for offset frequency stabilization. To this purpose, in this work, we have used one mode of the OR-comb, while exploiting its complete emission for an exhaustive characterization of the QCL-comb.

Frequency stability and comb parameters independent tuning

The QCL-comb mode frequencies can be simultaneously measured with high accuracy by acquiring RF spectra with a small RBW (0.5 Hz), limited by the spectrum analyzer maximum acquisition time of 2 s (Fig. 3a). The long acquisition time allows lowering the noise floor, thus enabling the detection of all the emitted modes. In the operating conditions presented in this work, the comb emission is made of 19 modes, with a total spectral coverage of about 400 GHz (−25-dB bandwidth). Moreover, the optical power of the individual modes can vary dramatically, which is another drawback of FWM based QCL-combs. Their RF frequencies coincide, within the RBW (Fig. 3a, insets), with the ones extrapolated from the reference signals frequencies (see Methods section). As a consequence, the emission linewidth of each QCL-comb mode is narrowed down to the linewidth of the OR-comb modes. This latter is ~2 Hz in 1 s, limited by the stability of the GPS-Rb-clock frequency reference used. The frequency reference accuracy of 2 × 10−12 also limits the measurement of the absolute QCL-comb THz frequencies, to a 6 Hz-level. However, for the most demanding applications, the GPS chain can be replaced with a fiber-delivered optical frequency standard, already available in our laboratories28, providing a stability of 1 × 10−14 in 1 s, and an accuracy of 2 × 10−1629.

Fig. 3
figure 3

High-resolution comb spectra and frequency tuning. a RF-comb spectrum measured with 0.5 Hz RBW, limited by the acquisition time of 2 s. Insets: zoom on two RBW-limited peaks. b Fine tuning of the QCL-comb frequencies. First, the fLO frequency of the PL-loop that stabilizes the comb-offset is tuned, in steps of 500 kHz, between 183 and 177 MHz. Then, the frequency of the injecting RF-signal (fRF) is tuned by 2.4 MHz, in steps of 200 kHz. Simultaneously, the RF-comb spectrum is acquired and the frequencies of individual modes are measured with a 100 Hz RBW

By varying fRF and fLO, a fine tuning of the corresponding QCL-comb parameters (spacing and offset, respectively) is obtained, as confirmed by the retrieved shifts of the RF-comb frequencies (Fig. 3b). Therefore, the double-locking procedure ensures tuning of the QCL-comb along two independent axes of its two-dimensional parameters space, which is a key requisite for full practical exploitation of this metrological-grade source. Actually, although the two actuators are not perfectly “orthogonal”, since the driving current affects both the spacing and offset frequencies, injection locking acts on the mode spacing only, allowing an independent tuning of the two parameters.

Short and long term stability of the modal phases

The employed FACE technique15 enables to retrieve the complete set of the modal phases, allowing to investigate their short-term noise and their long-term stability and reproducibility. To this purpose, several 2-seconds-long acquisitions of the multi-heterodyne signal have been analyzed. In order to assess the long-term reproducibility of the phases, different measurements were performed over different days, power cycling the QCL, changing the injection locking frequency and the device operating parameters (i.e. temperature and driving current). The device shows a quite stable phase pattern (Fig. 4a), with a phase reproducibility for individual modes always better than 50°. The retrieved phase relations show a parabolic trend, giving a 6.8(0.5) ps2/rad group delay dispersion (GDD). This value is close to that measured for a QCL-comb operating under comparable band alignment conditions, and without dispersion compensation geometry15. The retrieved phases and amplitudes of the QCL modes can also be used to reconstruct the QCL electric field and intensity emission profile, as shown in Fig. 4b. These reconstructions confirm that, while the QCL intensity is deeply modulated in time, it is far different from a short-pulse emission, since light is emitted during >40% of the round-trip time.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Measured phases. a Measured phases of each emitted mode. Different colors represent sets of measurements collected during different days and under different operating conditions. b QCL output intensity profile and electric field, reconstructed through one of the sets of phases shown in a

The short-term stability of the phases has been evaluated through calculation of the Allan deviations over a 2-seconds-long measurement for the modes labeled as −5… 7, sampled at 4 ms (Fig. 5a). Due to the poor S/N of modes −2 and 3 (see Fig. 3a), their phase cannot be determined at short timescales, leading to high values of the Allan deviation, dominated by instrumental noise. We can extrapolate the Allan deviations of the phases at ~1 s, as shown in Fig. 5a inset, and, except from these last two modes, they are all within 7°, which is a remarkable result if compared with the state-of-the-art in other spectral regions30.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Phase noise analysis. a Allan variance analysis on the phase of each comb mode during a 2-seconds-long acquisition. The characteristic trends confirm that the measurements are affected by statistical noise. Inset: linear dependence of extrapolated Allan deviation at 1 s on the mode order. b Correlation analysis on the phases fluctuations. On the diagonal, the correlation matrix shows the distributions of each mode phase fluctuations. Under the diagonal, the mutual correlation scatterplots of the modal phases are presented, while the corresponding correlation coefficient, color coded, is presented in the upper part of the matrix. The correlation and anti-correlation among all modal phases (except for modes −2 and 3) confirms that the statistical noise detected is due to residual instabilities of the QCL-comb spacing

Moreover, it is worth noting that the lowest noise level is measured on the phase-locked mode 0 and its neighbors, and progressively increases with the order N. This suggests that the dominant noise source is the residual noise from the spacing locking mechanism (i.e. injection locking), that coherently propagates along the comb. Such effect can be evidenced by calculating the correlation matrix among the modal phases (Fig. 5b). For modes −2 and 3, no correlation with the other modes appears, confirming that their fluctuations are limited by instrumental noise. At the same time, strong correlations and anti-correlations between modes which are, respectively, adjacent and opposite with respect to mode 0 can be seen. This behaviour can be found in traditional passively mode-locked frequency combs with residual phase noise and confirms the high level of coherence of the QCL-comb. Finally, principal components analysis can be performed on the correlation matrix by its diagonalization. The main eigenvalues normalized to the trace are (0.64, 0.29, 0.035, 0.025, 0.01…), confirming that the residual phase noise affecting the QCL-comb is, in fact, two-dimensional. The larger component is ascribed to comb modes spacing, rather than carrier offset frequency, suggesting that the injection locking mechanism should be improved.

Phase noise power spectral density analysis

The simultaneous retrieval of the Phase Noise Power Spectral Density (PNPSD) of the beat-notes, available from the Fourier-transform spectra of the RF-comb in 2-second-long acquisitions (see Fig. 3a), allows the analysis of the phase noise at timescales shorter than 4 ms. Figure 6a shows the PNPSD of the modes from 0 to 9. The instrumental noise floor corresponds to the PNPSD flat levels above 10 kHz, that are proportional to the inverse of the amplitude of each considered beat-note (see Fig. 6b) and set the sensitivity limit of the phase-noise measurement. In fact, for the most intense modes (e.g. modes 0 and 5), a higher sensitivity is achieved (lower PNPSD). At frequencies below 10 kHz, the residual phase noise of the modes emerges from the noise floor. Apart from mode 3, with a S/N that is too small, in this range the PNPSD levels are proportional to the order of the modes, instead of being proportional to their amplitude, as shown in Fig. 6c. This confirms that the measured excess noise is related to the modes spacing, while its shape suggests a 2 kHz locking bandwidth for the injection locking mechanism. The PNPSD of modes from 0 to −5 is reported in Supplementary Fig. 2, and shows the same kind of behaviour. It is worth noting that the Allan deviation analysis presented in Fig. 5a is related to the portion of the PNPSD below 250 Hz, thus further confirming the proportional dependence on the modes order shown in Fig. 5a inset.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Phase Noise Power Spectral Density analysis. Simultaneous retrieval of the PNPSD of the beat-notes from the Fourier-transform spectra of the RF-comb in 2-second-long acquisitions (see Fig. 3a). a PNPSD of modes from 0 to 9, smoothed with an exponential law. b PNPSD level dependence on the amplitude of the modes at 100 kHz. c PNPSD dependence on the order of the modes at 1.5 kHz, corresponding to the excess noise peak

Discussion

In conclusion, the reported results show that QCL-combs are well suited for the most demanding applications, achieving a Hz-level stabilization of each individual emitted mode, as well as a complete and independent control of the two key comb parameters. The retrieved phase relation, that enables reconstruction of the electric field and of the intensity profile, is impressively reproducible over different days, power cycles and operating conditions. The high degree of coherence induced by the FWM mode-locking mechanism is confirmed by a correlation analysis and PNPSD retrieval, showing a residual collective phase noise, due to an imperfect injection locking mechanism.

In the future, such a double-locking and phase characterization setup will be applied to dispersion-compensated devices, where comb operation at higher operating currents will ensure a broader spectral coverage. Novel comb-based setups will benefit from such fully phase-stabilized QCL-combs, addressing the most demanding metrological and sensing applications with miniaturized devices emitting in key spectral windows difficult to access, so far. Moreover, harnessing QCL nonlinearity, exploiting also novel phenomena, like χ2-cascaded frequency generation31, and making use of quantum simulation schemes in view of a fully-quantum design, QCL-combs with entangled modes and noise squeezed emission could become available, providing a solid-state miniaturized platform with a huge impact on a wide range of quantum technologies.

Methods

Design and fabrication of the QCL comb

The heterogeneous GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructure comprises three active modules, grown on a semi-insulating GaAs substrate by molecular beam epitaxy, exploiting alternating photon- and longitudinal optical (LO) phonon-assisted transitions between inter-miniband22. The number of periods, the order of the active region modules and the average doping were carefully arranged to give a flat gain and uniform power output across the whole spectrum. The gain medium of each modules is respectively centered at 3.5 THz, 3.0 THz, and 2.5 THz. The average doping was set to 3 × 1016 cm−332. Laser bars were fabricated on a standard metal–metal processing that relies on Au–Au thermo-compression wafer bonding of the 17-μm-thick active region onto a highly doped GaAs substrate. Laser bars were defined using dry-etching, leading to almost vertical sidewalls narrow laser cavities without any unpumped regions, to favour stable continuous wave (CW) operation. A Cr/Au (8 µm/150 µm) top contact was then deposited on the top surface of the laser bars, leaving thin (5 µm) symmetrical side regions uncovered, to suppress undesired high order lateral modes. Thin (5-nm-thick) lateral nickel side absorbers were then deposited over the uncovered region using a combination of optical lithography and thermal evaporation. Laser bars 60–85 µm wide and 2 mm long were finally cleaved and mounted on a copper bar on the cold finger of a helium cryostat.

Supplementary Fig. 1a shows the current–voltage characteristics of the THz QCL-comb used in this work. The intermode beat-note retrieved at 320 mA, where the QCL shows a single narrow signal, is plotted in Supplementary Fig. 1b, while the corresponding in air Fourier transform infrared spectrum is graphed in panel 1c, for reference.

Dual-comb down-conversion

In the dual-comb multi-heterodyne setup, the repetition rate frep of the OR-comb is tuned to be close to an integer submultiple of the frequency spacing fs of the QCL modes, with a small detuning fd:

$$f_{\mathrm{s}} = k \cdot f_{{\mathrm{rep}}} + f_{\mathrm{d}}$$
(1)

In this configuration, the QCL modes at THz frequencies are down-converted to RF beat-note (BN) signals. In fact, considering the electrical field of the Nth mode of the QCL-comb:

$$E_{Q,N} = B_Ne^{i\left[ {2\pi \left( {f_{{\mathrm{off}}} + Nf_{\mathrm{s}}} \right)t + \varphi _N} \right]}$$
(2)

heterodyning it with the Mth mode of the OR-comb:

$$E_{O,M} = A_Me^{i\left[ {2\pi \left( {Mf_{{\mathrm{rep}}}} \right)t + \varphi _M} \right]}$$
(3)

being \(M = k\cdot N\), the down-converted signal will carry the term:

$$A_MB_Ne^{i\left[ {2\pi \left( {f_{{\mathrm{off}}} + Nf_s - Mf_{{\mathrm{rep}}}} \right)t + \left( {\varphi _N - \varphi _M} \right)} \right]} = A_MB_Ne^{i\left[ {2\pi \left( {f_{{\mathrm{off}}} + Nf_d} \right)t + \left( {\varphi _N - \varphi _M} \right)} \right]}$$
(4)

In the above equations, foff is the offset frequency of the QCL-comb (the OR-comb is offset-free), while φN and φM are the Fourier phases of the QCL-comb mode and of the OR-comb mode, respectively.

If fd is chosen to be in the range of few MHz, the resulting BNs are RF signals, equally spaced by fd, that can be simultaneously analyzed by a spectrum analyzer. The signal in eq. 4 clearly bears information on both the amplitudes and phases of the two parent modes. In particular, the OR-comb phases are constant in time and their phase relation is linear, as for any mode-locked pulsed FC source15, while their amplitude is expected to be almost constant along the QCL-comb emitted spectrum24. Moreover, the OR-comb is naturally a zero-offset FC, whose modes can be fully stabilized at a metrological level by phase-locking its repetition rate to a 10 MHz quartz-clock disciplined by a Rb-GPS (global positioning system) clock with a stability of 6 × 10−13 in 1 s, and absolute accuracy of 2 × 10−12. On the other hand, the free-running QCL-comb emission frequencies will oscillate due to both offset and spacing fluctuations, preventing an accurate phase/frequency retrieval from the BN signals, especially for long observation times. Injection locking and phase locking to one OR-comb mode are used to remove these fluctuations, fully stabilizing the QCL-comb emission.

Moreover, since all the parameters governing the QCL-comb down conversion are referenced to the primary frequency standard, the frequency fi of the ith RF-comb mode can be calculated with this same precision, simply considering that:

$$f_i = f_{{\mathrm{LO}}} + i\cdot \left( {kf_{{\mathrm{rep}}} - f_{{\mathrm{RF}}}} \right)$$
(5)

and these values can be compared to the ones experimentally retrieved with a 500 mHz accuracy, as reported in the main text.

This accuracy level allows also to simultaneously retrieve all the absolute THz frequencies of the QCL-comb modes with an accuracy limit set by the GPS-Rb-clock chain. In fact, if the RF beat-note at frequency fi is originated from the Nth mode of the QCL comb, beating with the Mth mode of the OR-comb, one can write the relation:

$$f_{{\mathrm{QCL}},N} = M\cdot f_{{\mathrm{rep}}} \pm f_i$$
(6)

By tuning frep and leaving all the other parameters unaltered, it is possible to unambiguosly retrieve the order M (around 12,000), as thoroughly explained in ref. 33. Finally, while the accuracy on fi is 500 mHz, the phase-locked frep follows the GPS-Rb-quartz chain accuracy, that provides the limiting uncertainty factor in the fQCL,N measurement of about 6 Hz.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Hänsch, T. W. Nobel lecture: passion for precision. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1297–1309 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diddams, S. A. et al. Direct link between microwave and optical frequencies with a 300THz femtosecond laser comb. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5102–5105 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Udem, T., Holzwarth, R. & Hänsch, T. W. Optical frequency metrology. Nature 416, 233–237 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holzwarth, R. et al. Optical frequency synthesizer for precision spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2264–2267 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Savchenkov, A. A. et al. Generation of Kerr combs centered at 45 μm in crystalline microresonators pumped with quantum-cascade lasers. Opt. Lett. 40, 3468–3471 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luke, K., Okawachi, Y., Lamont, M. R. E., Gaeta, A. L. & Lipson, M. Broadband mid-infrared frequency comb generation in a Si3N4 microresonator. Opt. Lett. 40, 4823–4826 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, H. et al. Dynamics of ultra-broadband terahertz quantum cascade lasers for comb operation. Opt. Express 23, 33270–33294 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, F. et al. Generating ultrafast pulses of light from quantum cascade lasers. Optica 2, 944–949 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tzenov, P. et al. Passive and hybrid mode locking in multi-section terahertz quantum cascade lasers. New J. Phys. 20, 053055 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barbieri, S. et al. Coherent sampling of active mode-locked terahertz quantum cascade lasers and frequency synthesis. Nat. Photonics 5, 306–313 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, F. et al. Short terahertz pulse generation from a dispersion compensated modelocked semiconductor laser. Laser Photonics Rev. 11, 1–9 (2017).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hugi, A., Villares, G., Blaser, S., Liu, H. C. & Faist, J. Mid-infrared frequency comb based on a quantum cascade laser. Nature 492, 229–233 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Burghoff, D. et al. Terahertz laser frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 8, 462–467 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Singleton, M., Jouy, P., Beck, M. & Faist, J. Evidence of linear chirp in mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers. Optica 5, 948–953 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cappelli, F. et al. Retrieval of phase relation and emission profile of quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Nat. Photon. (2019, in press). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0451-1

  16. Burghoff, D. et al. Evaluating the coherence and time-domain profile of quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Opt. Express 23, 1190–1202 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coddington, I., Newbury, N. & Swann, W. Dual-comb spectroscopy. Optica 3, 414–426 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Villares, G., Hugi, A., Blaser, S. & Faist, J. Dual-comb spectroscopy based on quantum-cascade-laser frequency combs. Nat. Commun. 5, 5192 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hillbrand, J., Maxwell Andrews, A., Detz, H., Strasser, G. & Schwarz, B. Coherent injection locking of quantum cascade laser frequency combs. Nat. Photonics 13, 101–104 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cappelli, F. et al. Frequency stability characterization of a quantum cascade laser frequency comb. Laser Photonics Rev. 10, 623–630 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vitiello, M. S. et al. Quantum-limited frequency fluctuations in a terahertz laser. Nat. Photonics 6, 525–528 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Garrasi, K. et al. High dynamic range, heterogeneous, terahertz quantum cascade lasers featuring thermally tunable frequency comb operation over a broad current range. ACS Photonics 6, 73–78 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Regis, M., Consolino, L., Bartalini, S. & De Natale, P. Waveguided approach for difference frequency generation of broadly-tunable continuous-wave terahertz radiation. Appl. Sci. 8, 2374 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Consolino, L. et al. Phase-locking to a free-space terahertz comb for metrological-grade terahertz lasers. Nat. Commun. 3, 1040 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartalini, S. et al. Frequency-comb-assisted terahertz quantum cascade laser spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 4, 21006 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Consolino, L., Bartalini, S. & De Natale, P. Terahertz frequency metrology for spectroscopic applications: a review. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves 38, 1289–1315 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. De Regis, M. et al. Room-temperature continuous-wave frequency-referenced spectrometer up to 7.5THz. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 064041 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Insero, G. et al. Measuring molecular frequencies in the 1–10μm range at 11-digits accuracy. Sci. Rep. 7, 12780 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Calonico, D. et al. High-accuracy coherent optical frequency transfer over a doubled 642-km fiber link. Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt. 117, 979–986 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, Z., Yan, M., Hänsch, T. W. & Picqué, N. A phase-stable dual-comb interferometer. Nat. Commun. 9, 3035 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mosca, S. et al. Modulation instability induced frequency comb generation in a continuously pumped optical parametric oscillator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 093903 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li, L. H. et al. Broadband heterogeneous terahertz frequency quantum cascade laser. Electron. Lett. 54, 1229–1231 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Consolino, L. et al. Spectral purity and tunability of terahertz quantum cascade laser sources based on intracavity difference-frequency generation. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603317 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support from the EC Project 665158 (ULTRAQCL), the ERC Project 681379 (SPRINT), the Italian ESFRI Roadmap (Extreme Light Infrastructure—ELI), EC–H2020 Laserlab-Europe grant agreement 654148, Ministero dell ‘Istruzione, dell’ Università e della Ricerca (Project PRIN-2015KEZNYM “NEMO—Nonlinear dynamics of optical frequency combs”). We also acknowledge support from the EPSRC (HyperTerahertz programme, EP/P021859/1). EHL acknowledges support from the Royal Society and Wolfson Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.C. and S.B. conceived the experiment, L.C. performed the measurements, L.C., M.N., F.C., and S.B analysed the data, L.C. wrote the manuscript, M.N., F.C., M.S.V., P.D.N., and S.B. contributed to manuscript revision, K.G., F.P.M. and M.S.V. fabricated the QCL device, L.L., A.G.D. and E.H.L. grew the QCL heterostructure, L.C., M.N., F.C., P.D.N., and S.B. discussed the results, M.S.V. supervised the design and development of the THz QCL combs. The work was done under the joint supervision of P.D.N. and S.B.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Consolino.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Consolino, L., Nafa, M., Cappelli, F. et al. Fully phase-stabilized quantum cascade laser frequency comb. Nat Commun 10, 2938 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10913-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10913-7

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing