Abstract
The quantum noise of the vacuum limits the achievable sensitivity of quantum sensors. In nonclassical measurement schemes the noise can be reduced to overcome this limitation. However, schemes based on squeezed or Schrödinger cat states require alignment of the relative phase between the measured interaction and the nonclassical quantum state. Here we present two measurement schemes on a trapped ion prepared in a motional Fock state for displacement and frequency metrology that are insensitive to this phase. The achieved statistical uncertainty is below the standard quantum limit set by quantum vacuum fluctuations, enabling applications in spectroscopy and mass measurements.
Introduction
Nonvanishing fluctuations of the vacuum state are a salient feature of quantum theory. These fluctuations fundamentally limit the precision of quantum sensors. Advances in the ability to control quantum systems together with the suppression of classical noise originating from technical imperfections, has led to the emergence of sensors, such as optical clocks^{1}, gravitational wave detectors^{2}, matterwave interferometers, magnetometers^{3}, and optomechanical systems^{4}, that approach measurement sensitivities where the effect of quantum fluctuations sets a fundamental limit, the so called standard quantum limit (SQL). For more than 30 years it has been known that certain types of nonclassical states can reduce the effect of quantum noise and thus enhance the sensitivity of measurement devices beyond the classical limit^{5}. Taking advantage of this subSQL sensitivity requires not only the preparation of the nonclassical state with high fidelity, but also the prevention of signal loss in the entire measurement protocol. This has been achieved e.g., with squeezed states and Schrödingercat or N00N states in interferometric settings^{6,7,8,9}. A common restriction of these types of nonclassical states is the need for control over the relative phase between the state creation and the measurement interaction^{10,11}. Lack of control can lead to an amplification of noise and reduces the sensitivity of the device. In a phasespace picture, squeezing along the displacement direction enhances the sensitivity for amplitude measurements, but weakens the sensitivity for phase measurements.
Here we experimentally demonstrate a quantum metrological paradigm based on phaseinsensitive motional Fock states^{12} of a trapped ion, with applications in frequency metrology and displacement detection. More specifically, we present subSQL measurements of amplitude and phase of the motional state of a trapped ion using the same motional Fock state. This is enabled by the implementation of a measurement scheme that allows direct detection of individual Fock state populations (see Methods). The measurement apparatus is operated in two different experimental settings, each probing displacements in one of two orthogonal quadrature components with sensitivities beyond the SQL using the same initial quantum state. Firstly, the amplitude of the ion’s oscillation is varied and the phase is kept constant, which realizes a displacement or force sensor^{13,14,15}. Secondly, the Fock state is displaced with a fixed amplitude in a Ramseylike interferometry sequence to measure the phase of the ion’s oscillation, which implements a measurement of the oscillation frequency of the ion in the trap. In both measurements, classical preparation and detection noise are sufficiently small to preserve the quantum gain in a full metrological protocol. Furthermore, we prove that Fock states are optimal for sensing displacements with unknown phase.
Results
Experimental apparatus
The experiments are performed with a single ^{25}Mg^{+} ion confined in a linear Paul trap. Excited motional Fock states are created starting from the motional and electronic ground state^{16}, through a sequence of laserdriven blue and red sideband pulses that each add a quantum of motion while changing the internal state of the ion^{17,18}. A calibrated displacement \(\hat D(\alpha ) = {\mathrm{exp}}\left( {\alpha \hat a^\dagger  \alpha ^ \ast \hat a} \right)\) is implemented by exposing the ion to an electric field oscillating at the trapping frequency of ω_{z} = 2π × 1.89 MHz. The displacement amplitude α can be controlled through the modulation time t_{F} (see Methods for more details). It is measured by mapping the overlap between initial and displaced state onto the atomic qubit (↑〉, ↓〉, encoded in two hyperfine states of the ^{2}S_{1/2} electronic ground state of ^{25}Mg^{+}), where statereadout is performed using state dependent fluorescence^{19}. The mapping process is implemented by a sequence of sideband rapid adiabatic passage (RAP)^{20} and microwave pulses and is described in more detail in the Methods section.
Displacement amplitude measurement
Figure 1a shows the principle and Fig. 1e the result of the displacement amplitude measurement for three different initial Fock states (n = 0, 1, and 2). The expected state overlap is given by \(\left {\langle nD(\alpha )n\rangle } \right^2 = {\mathrm{exp}}\left( {  \alpha ^2} \right)\left( {{\cal{L}}_n\left( {\alpha ^2} \right)} \right)^2\), with the Laguerre polynomials \({\cal{L}}_n\)^{21}. The measurement suffers from reduced contrast due to imperfections in state preparation and the detection process, which are of technical nature and pose no fundamental limitation. To account for these imperfections the fitting function depicted by the solid line in Fig. 1c is \(P_{{\mathrm{fit}}} = C_1 + C_2\,{\mathrm{exp}}\left( {  \dot \alpha t_{\mathrm{F}}^2} \right)\left( {{\cal{L}}_n\left( {\dot \alpha t_{\mathrm{F}}^2} \right)} \right)^2,\) with free parameters C_{1}, C_{2}, and \(\dot \alpha\). The fitted value of \(\dot \alpha\) for the n = 0 data is used to calibrate the displacement strength shown on the upper xaxis. The offset and reduced contrast, described by the parameters C_{1} and C_{1}, respectively, are mainly caused by offresonant Raman scattering during the detection pulses (see Methods).
In contrast to the monotonous behavior of the n = 0 measurement outcome, the data for the excited Fock states exhibit fringes due to interference in phase space^{22}. The interference fringes and the resulting metrological gain of Fock states can be intuitively understood as a consequence of the negative regions of the Wigner function as shown in Fig.1d. In phase space the overlap of two quantum states is represented by the integral over the product of the Wigner functions
In consequence the overlap between a classical state (with positive Wigner function) and its displaced counterpart only vanishes for vanishing overlap of the phasespace contours of the involved states (see Fig. 1c). However, if the quantum state reveals negative values in the Wigner function, as is the case for Fock states, the negative parts in the product can cancel the positive parts and lead to vanishing overlap before the wave packets are spatially separated (see Fig. 1d). The metrological gain is quantified by the Fisher information \({\cal{F}}\) for the displacement measurement, which can be extracted from the data shown in Fig. 1 (see Methods for details). The result is shown in Fig. 2a. For a displacement of α = 0.59 the measured Fisher information for the n = 1 Fock state measurement is \({\cal{F}}_{n = 1} = 5.37(63)\) (error is standard deviation (s.d)), which implies a metrological gain of \(g_{{\mathrm{SQL}}} = \frac{{{\cal{F}}_{n = 1}(\alpha = 0.59)}}{{{\cal{F}}_{{\mathrm{SQL}}}}} = 1.3\,{\mathrm{dB}}\) compared to the theoretical SQL, \({\cal{F}}_{{\mathrm{SQL}}} = 4\), and \(g = \frac{{{\cal{F}}_{n = 1}(\alpha = 0.59)}}{{{\mathrm{max}}_\alpha ({\cal{F}}_{n = 0})}} = 3.6\,{\mathrm{dB}}\) compared to the achieved performance for the n = 0 state (\({\cal{F}}_{n = 0}(\alpha = 0.59) = 2.36(30)\)). This corresponds to a reduction in averaging time by more than a factor of two for the same displacement resolution. The Fisher information is directly linked to the achievable measurement uncertainty by the CramérRao bound
where N is the number of independent experimental cycles. In agreement with the Cramér–Rao bound, the uncertainty for the displacement measurement shown in Fig. 2b in the form of an Allan deviation σ_{α} averages down faster for the n = 1 Fock state (red circles) compared to the ground state (blue circles). The Allan deviation has been calculated from the measured state overlap \(\langle nD(\alpha )n\rangle ^2\) and the predetermined slope of the signal from Fig. 1e. Note that for white noise, the Allan deviation σ_{α} and standard deviation Δα are identical. The achieved resolution for displacement of \(\sigma _A\left( {N = 2^{16}} \right) = 65(23)\,{\mathrm{pm}}\) for n = 0 and \(\sigma _A\left( {N = 2^{16}} \right) = 32(18)\,{\mathrm{pm}}\) for n = 1 can be translated into force measurement resolution (see Supplementary Note 1) of 1.8(0.6) yN for n = 0 and 0.9(0.5) yN for n = 1 after N = 2^{16} = 65536 independent experiments, where an experimental cycle takes 8.1 ms and 9.5 ms for the n = 0 and n = 1 measurement, respectively.
For displacements generated by \(\hat R(\phi _{{\mathrm{LO}}}) = \left( {{\mathrm{sin}}\left( {\phi _{{\mathrm{LO}}}} \right)\hat X \, + {\mathrm{cos}}\left( {\phi _{{\mathrm{LO}}}} \right)\hat P} \right)/\sqrt 2\) with a fixed phase ϕ_{LO} the required resource for the quantum enhancement can be identified as nonclassicality in terms of the Glauber–Sudarshan Pdistribution^{23}. Here, however, we consider the more challenging scenario of displacement sensing with an unknown phase. A suitable figure of merit in this case is the sensitivity minimized over all phases. We show in Supplementary Note 4 that this quantity is maximized by pure nonGaussian states, which necessarily have a negative Wigner function^{24}. Furthermore, we show that Fock states are optimal for phaseinsensitive displacement sensing. The quantum gain provided by Fock states of n > 0 is independent of the phase as their quantum Fisher information F_{Q} = 8n + 4 does not depend on ϕ_{LO}. It is an interesting open question if phaseinsensitive displacement sensing beyond the SQL can in general be linked to negativity of the Wigner function.
Phase measurement
As a consequence of the insensitivity of the Fock state to the displacement direction, the same state can be employed for quantumenhanced sensing of displacement amplitude and phase changes. We demonstrate this feature by measuring the oscillation frequency of the trapped ion with subSQL resolution in a Ramseylike experiment as sketched in Fig. 3b. The Ramsey sequence starts with the initialization of the ion’s motion in a Fock state (I) and a subsequent displacement in phase space (II). If the drive for the displacement was detuned by δ from the trap frequency, the displaced state will evolve in phase space on a circle around the origin and accumulate a phase ϕ = δ × T compared to the driving field during the waiting time T (III). Undoing the displacement (IV) maps this phase onto a residual displacement \(\tilde \alpha\) that can be detected with the overlap detection method introduced above. The center fringe of the Ramsey pattern for waiting time T = 50 μs and initial displacement α = 1.6 is shown in Fig. 3a. As illustrated by the data shown in Fig. 3c, the width of the center fringe decreases with increasing Fock state order. The fullwidthhalfmaximum (FWHM) is extracted from a Gaussian fit to the center peaks. Note that a narrower width does not necessarily imply a metrological gain. For an increase in Fisher information the slope of the line feature has to increase. For n = 2 the reduction in linewidth is fully compensated by the reduced contrast. The whole Ramsey pattern for the different initial Fock states is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1 and the theoretical lineshape is derived in Supplementary Note 3.
To evaluate the performance of the quantum sensing techniques, we have performed a trapping frequency measurement by twopoint sampling and analyzed the data in terms of an Allan deviation (see Fig. 4). Since the n = 2 Fock state in our case does not provide an additional metrological advantage (see Fig. 2) as a consequence of the reduced contrast caused by technical limitations of the implementation, we have performed the Allan deviation analysis for the n = 0 and n = 1 Fock state only. The measurement has been performed in an interleaved pattern with an average cycle time of 6.6 ms and 7.8 ms for the n = 0 and n = 1 measurement, respectively. The Allan deviation for the n = 0 protocol averages down to \(\sigma _\delta ^{n = 0} = 2\pi \times 5.8(3)\,{\mathrm{Hz}}\). The achievable resolution is limited by a linear drift of the trapping frequency, which leads to an increase in the Allan deviation for long averaging times. The red line in Fig. 4 is the SQL given by
which is the lowest statistical uncertainty achievable with a classical state (Supplementary Note 5). For the quantumenhanced technique with n = 1, the overlapping Allan deviation reaches \(\sigma _\delta ^{n = 1} = 2\pi \times 3.6(2)\,{\mathrm{Hz}}\) before it increases due to the linear drift. Using the n = 1 Fock state improves the frequency resolution by more than 60% compared to the vacuum state. This is a direct consequence of the quantumenhanced reduction in averaging time, which allows measuring the trapping frequency with high accuracy before it starts drifting.
Discussion
In summary, we have demonstrated a quantumenhanced sensing scheme based on motional Fock states to measure the amplitude and the phase of an oscillating force with resolution below the standard quantum limit. The demonstrated sensing scheme is conceptually different from a previously demonstrated quantumenhanced method to measure motional frequencies based on phasesensitive superpositions of Fock states^{25} that has recently been improved^{26}. In contrast to the scheme presented here, amplitude measurements are not accessible with this technique. The Fock state sensing scheme does not require any phase relation between the displacement and the quantum state of the detector, which is an important feature when measuring arbitrary interactions without prior phase information (see Supplementary Fig. 2). Previously implemented phaseinsensitive schemes exploited correlated modes of atomic ensembles^{3,27}, while our scheme requires no mode entanglement.
A technological application of this technique is the measurement of small rf signals applied to a suitable electrode of the ion trap^{28} with enhanced signaltonoise ratio. Quantum logic spectroscopy^{29} based on motional displacements^{30,31} will benefit from the presented amplitude detection technique, in particular for state detection and spectroscopy of nonclosed transitions^{32}, where scattering on the spectroscopy ion has to be reduced to a minimum. Specifically, this approach may help to find narrow transitions in highlycharged ions (HCI) that are typically only known with large uncertainty^{33}. The small displacement exerted by an optical standing wave tuned near a narrow resonance of a HCI can be detected for larger detunings using the demonstrated Fock state metrology scheme, thus reducing the time to find the transition. Further, these schemes benefit from the phase insensitivity, because the initial motional state is in general produced by manipulating the logic ion with a laser that is independent from the spectroscopy laser. Applications of quantumenhanced spectroscopy are tests for variation of fundamental constants using molecular ions^{34,35}, highlycharged ions^{33}, and optical clocks^{1,31}. Isotope shift measurements^{36,37} based on photon recoil spectroscopy profit from an improved detection of the small displacement of scattered photons^{10,30} and probe nuclear structure and new physics effects^{38,39,40,41}.
The presented quantumenhanced frequency measurement can help to further improve high precision mass measurements of atoms in Paul traps^{42} and gfactor measurements of subatomic particles, such as (anti)protons in Penning traps^{43,44}. Both cases will benefit from a quantum logic approach, in which a mass or spindependent force on the particle of interest is probed with quantumenhanced sensitivity by a nearby wellcontrollable logic ion using motional Fock states.
In Supplementary Note 6, the analogy to a general two mode interferometer is drawn, which shows that the presented scheme can in principle also be applied to optical and atomic interferometers that have widespread applications from gravitational wave detection^{2} to inertial sensing^{45}.
Further improvements in sensitivity can be achieved by employing techniques that allow the generation and overlap detection of larger Fock states with high fidelity. Scalable overlap measurements for Fock states up to n = 10 have been reported^{46}, allowing phaseinsensitive suppression of quantum projection noise of up to 13.2 dB.
Methods
Trap modulation to implement displacement operator
Applying a resonantly oscillating electric field at the position of the ion leads to a displacement of the ion’s motional state in phase space^{47}. The interaction Hamiltonian for a trapped ion with an additional timedependent potential \(V(t,z) =  qE(t)\hat z\), where q and \(\hat z\) are the charge and the position of the ion, respectively, and E(t) is the timedependent electric field, that is assumed to be spatially constant over the extent of the ion’s wave function, can be written as
in an interaction picture with respect to the free harmonic oscillation Hamiltonian \(\hat H_{{\mathrm{HO}}} = \hbar \omega _z\hat a^\dagger \hat a\) and \(\hat z\) is the position operator \(\hat z = z_0\left( {\hat a{\mathrm{e}}^{  {\mathrm{i}}\omega _zt} + \hat a^\dagger {\mathrm{e}}^{{\mathrm{i}}\omega _zt}} \right)\) with the annihilation(creation) operator \(\hat a(\hat a^\dagger )\) and ground state wave function extent \(z_0 = \sqrt {\hbar /2m\omega _z}\). For an electric field oscillating at the trapping frequency ω_{z}, this leads to the static Hamiltonian
where fast oscillating terms (at twice the trapping frequency) are neglected within the rotating wave approximation. Here, ϕ_{LO} and E_{0} are the phase and amplitude of the driving field, respectively. The unitary evolution according to this Hamiltonian is
and can be identified as the displacement \(\hat D(\alpha ) = {\mathrm{e}}^{\alpha \hat a^\dagger  \alpha ^ \ast \hat a}\) operator with displacement amplitude \(\alpha = \frac{{{\mathrm{i}}qE_0z_o}}{{2\hbar }}{\mathrm{e}}^{{\mathrm{i}}\phi _{{\mathrm{LO}}}} \times t\).
Overlap measurement
All measurements described in the manuscript rely on the ability to measure the motional state population in a given Fock state. To achieve this, we have implemented a sequence that transfers a selected initial population p_{n} to the motional and electronic ground state, while all other motional population is in the ↑〉 state. Stateselective fluorescence then provides the population p_{n}. The sequence for measuring p_{0}, p_{1} and p_{2} is shown in Fig. 5. The ion is initialized in the ↑〉state. At the beginning of the detection sequence the motional population {p_{n}} is distributed over several motional Fock states n. (I). A blue sideband rapid adiabatic passage pulse (RAP) transfers the internal state to ↓〉, while simultaneously taking out a quantum of motion, therefore keeping the ground state population untouched^{20}. Averaging the number of ↓〉 and ↑〉 detection events after this mapping step provides the n = 0 population. For higher order Fock state detection the protocol has to be extended as follows. The ground state population can be hidden in a dark auxiliary state aux〉 by radio frequency pulses (II). In ^{25}Mg^{+} the Zeeman substates with m_{F} = 1, 0, −1, −2 of the F = 2 dark hyperfine state can be used for this purpose. A second sideband RAP pulse (III), this time on the red sideband, flips the spin for all motional states except for the ground state, which stores the information about the initial Fock state n = 1 population. Fluorescence detection of the ion’s spin will give the initial n = 1 Fock state population. To detect even higher Fock states, the spin is flipped independent of the motional state to initialize the ↑〉state again (IV). Now steps (II)–(IV) are repeated until the desired Fock state population is isolated in the state ↓〉 from the rest of motional population (e.g., see (V)–(VII) for n = 2). Reduced contrast due to offresonant scattering during the involved RAP pulses is the main limitation in our experiments. We estimate single πflop fidelities on sideband transitions to be above 95%. However, the detection sequence in a protocol for Fock state n requires n + 1 RAP pulses with a pulse area of around 10 πtimes resulting in a loss of contrast of around 10% per RAP pulse. This limitation can be overcome by operating the Raman laser with a larger detuning, which requires higher laser power, or ion species providing an optical qubit such as Ca^{+} that do not suffer from this limitation. The ultimate limitation for high n is the limited number of auxiliary states available in ^{25}Mg^{+}. However, other techniques for phonon counting up to n = 10 by exploiting trap induced Kerrnonlinearities have been demonstrated^{46} and modifications using laserinduced Kerrnonlinearities^{48} combined with continuous dynamic decoupling techniques^{49} might be an option for future implementations.
Quantum metrology
The precision of an estimation is bounded by means of the Cramér–Rao bound as
where θ_{est} is an arbitrary estimator for θ, N is the number of repeated measurements, and
is the (classical) Fisher information. The probability distribution \(P(\mu \theta ) = {\mathrm{Tr}}\{ {\hat{\mathrm{{\Pi}}}}_\mu \hat \rho (\theta )\}\) is determined by the quantum state \(\hat \rho (\theta )\) and the choice of measurement, described by the projectors \(\{ {\hat{\mathrm{{\Pi}}}}_\mu \} _\mu\). We consider scenarios in which the unknown phase θ is imprinted by a unitary process, i.e. \(\hat \rho (\theta ) = \hat U(\theta )\hat \rho \hat U(\theta )^\dagger\) with \(\hat U(\theta ) = e^{  i\hat H\theta }\).
The mean value \(\langle \hat M\rangle _{\hat \rho (\theta )} = {\mathrm{Tr}}\{ \hat M\hat \rho (\theta )\}\) and variance \(\left( {{\mathrm{\Delta }}\hat M} \right)_{\hat \rho (\theta )}^2 = \left\langle {\hat M^2} \right\rangle _{\hat \rho (\theta )}  \left\langle {\hat M} \right\rangle _{\hat \rho (\theta )}^2\) of the measured observable \(\hat M = \mathop {\sum}\limits_\mu {\mu {\hat{\mathrm{{\Pi}}}}_\mu }\) can be used to derive a lower bound for the Fisher information^{50}
This bound is tight if there are only the two measurement outcomes μ = 1, 0 with \(P(1\theta ) = 1  P(0\theta )\) and \(({\mathrm{\Delta }}\hat M)_{\hat \rho (\theta )}^2 = P(1\theta )(1  P(0\theta ))\).
Maximizing the Fisher information over all possible measurements leads to the quantum Fisher information^{51}
which is a function of the initial state \(\hat \rho\) and the generator \(\hat H\) of the unitary evolution. We obtain the quantum Cramér–Rao bound as the general precision limit for quantum parameter estimation^{52}
Extracting the Fisher information from experimental data
We can use the data shown in Fig. 1c to get a measured value for the Fisher information of our measurement. As can be seen from Eq. 9, the Fisher information depends on the slope and the noise properties of the measurement presented before. The slope \(s(\alpha _i) = \frac{{d\langle \hat M\rangle _{\hat \rho (\alpha )}}}{{d\alpha }}\) is experimentally determined for each displacement amplitude α_{i} by a symmetric difference quotient
For the first and last measurement point is determined by an asymmetric difference quotient
As discussed before, the noise is dominated by quantum projection noise.
Oscillation amplitude
For a harmonic oscillator, the position observable \(\hat x\) is related to the quadrature component \(\hat X = \frac{1}{{\sqrt 2 }}\left( {\hat a^\dagger + \hat a} \right)\) by
From this relation the expectation value of the position operator for a coherent state \(\alpha\) can be evaluated to be
Therefore the oscillation amplitude for a given displacement is A = 2z_{0}α. Accordingly, the yaxis in Fig. 2b was scaled by ΔA = 2z_{0}Δα.
References
 1.
Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E. & Schmidt, P. Optical atomic clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637–701 (2015).
 2.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
 3.
Wasilewski, W. et al. Quantum noise limited and entanglementassisted magnetometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 133601 (2010).
 4.
Aspelmeyer, M., Kippenberg, T. J. & Marquardt, F. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391–1452 (2014).
 5.
Caves, C. M. Quantummechanical noise in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. D. 23, 1693 (1981).
 6.
The LIGO Scientific collaboration. Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light. Nat. Photon. 7, 613–619, http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v7/n8/full/nphoton.2013.177.html?WT.ec_id=NPHOTON201308 (2013).
 7.
Leroux, I., SchleierSmith, M. & Vuletić, V. Orientationdependent entanglement lifetime in a squeezed atomic clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 250801 (2010).
 8.
Hosten, O., Engelsen, N. J., Krishnakumar, R. & Kasevich, M. A. Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantumprojection limit using entangled atoms. Nature 529, 505–508 (2016).
 9.
Ockeloen, C. F., Schmied, R., Riedel, M. F. & Treutlein, P. Quantum metrology with a scanning probe atom interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 143001 (2013).
 10.
Hempel, C. et al. Entanglementenhanced detection of singlephoton scattering events. Nat. Photon. 7, 630–633, http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v7/n8/full/nphoton.2013.172.html?WT.ec_id=NPHOTON201308 (2013).
 11.
Lo, H.Y. et al. Spinmotion entanglement and state diagnosis with squeezed oscillator wavepackets. Nature 521, 336–339, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v521/n7552/full/nature14458.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE20150521 (2015).
 12.
Pezzè, L. & Smerzi, A. Ultrasensitive twomode interferometry with singlemode number squeezing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 163604 (2013).
 13.
Shaniv, R. & Ozeri, R. Quantum lockin force sensing using optical clock Doppler velocimetry. Nat. Commun. 8, 14157 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309847/ (2017).
 14.
Biercuk, M. J., Uys, H., Britton, J. W., VanDevender, A. P. & Bollinger, J. J. Ultrasensitive detection of force and displacement using trapped ions. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 646–650, http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v5/n9/full/nnano.2010.165.html (2010).
 15.
Gilmore, K. A., Bohnet, J. G., Sawyer, B. C., Britton, J. W. & Bollinger, J. J. Amplitude sensing below the zeropoint fluctuations with a twodimensional trappedion mechanical oscillator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 263602 (2017).
 16.
Wan, Y., Gebert, F., Wolf, F. & Schmidt, P. O. Efficient sympathetic motionalgroundstate cooling of a molecular ion. Phys. Rev. A. 91, 043425 (2015).
 17.
Meekhof, D. M., Monroe, C., King, B. E., Itano, W. M. & Wineland, D. J. Generation of nonclassical motional states of a trapped atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1796–1799 (1996).
 18.
Wineland, D. J. et al. Experimental issues in coherent quantumstate manipulation of trapped atomic ions. J. Res. Natl Inst. Stand. Technol. 103, 259–328 (1998).
 19.
Hemmerling, B., Gebert, F., Wan, Y. & Schmidt, P. O. A novel, robust quantum detection scheme. N. J. Phys. 14, 023043 http://iopscience.iop.org/13672630/14/2/023043 (2012).
 20.
Gebert, F., Wan, Y., Wolf, F., Heip, J. C. & Schmidt, P. O. Detection of motional ground state population of a trapped ion using delayed pulses. N. J. Phys. 18, 013037 http://stacks.iop.org/13672630/18/i=1/a=013037 (2016).
 21.
de Oliveira, F. A. M., Kim, M. S., Knight, P. L. & Buek, V. Properties of displaced number states. Phys. Rev. A. 41, 2645–2652 (1990).
 22.
Schleich, W. & Wheeler, J. A. Oscillations in photon distribution of squeezed states and interference in phase space. Nature 326, 574–577, https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v326/n6113/abs/326574a0.html (1987).
 23.
Rivas, A. & Luis, A. Precision quantum metrology and nonclassicality in linear and nonlinear detection schemes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 010403 (2010).
 24.
Hudson, R. When is the wigner quasiprobability density nonnegative. Rep. Math. Phys. 6, 249–252, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/003448777490007X (1974).
 25.
Leibfried, D. et al. Trappedion quantum simulator: experimental application to nonlinear interferometers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 247901 (2002).
 26.
McCormick, K. C. et al. Quantumenhanced sensing of a mechanical oscillator. arXiv:1807.11934 (2018).
 27.
Lücke, B. et al. Twin matter waves for interferometry beyond the classical limit. Science 334, 773–776, http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6057/773.abstract (2011).
 28.
Heinzen, D. J. & Wineland, D. J. Quantumlimited cooling and detection of radiofrequency oscillations by lasercooled ions. Phys. Rev. A. 42, 2977–2994 (1990).
 29.
Schmidt, P. O. et al. Spectroscopy using quantum logic. Science 309, 749–752, http://www.sciencemag.org/content/309/5735/749.abstract (2005).
 30.
Wan, Y. et al. Precision spectroscopy by photonrecoil signal amplification. Nat. Commun. 5, 4096 http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140130/ncomms4096/full/ncomms4096.html (2014).
 31.
Hume, D. B. et al. Trappedion state detection through coherent motion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 243902 (2011).
 32.
Wolf, F. et al. Nondestructive state detection for quantum logic spectroscopy of molecular ions. Nature 530, 457–460, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v530/n7591/full/nature16513.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE20160225spMailingID=50771961spUserID=MjA1NTA5MDEyMwS2spJobID=863026682spReportId=ODYzMDI2NjgyS0 (2016).
 33.
Kozlov, M. G., Safronova, M. S., Crespo LópezUrrutia, J. R. & Schmidt, P. O. Highly charged ions: optical clocks and applications in fundamental physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045005 (2018).
 34.
Schiller, S. & Korobov, V. Tests of time independence of the electron and nuclear masses with ultracold molecules. Phys. Rev. A. 71, 032505 (2005).
 35.
Flambaum, V. & Kozlov, M. Enhanced sensitivity to the time variation of the finestructure constant and mp/me in diatomic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 150801 (2007).
 36.
Gebert, F. et al. Precision isotope shift measurements in calcium ions using quantum logic detection schemes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 053003 (2015).
 37.
Shi, C. et al. Unexpectedly large difference of the electron density at the nucleus in the 4p^{2}P_{1/2,3/2} finestructure doublet of Ca^{+}. Appl. Phys. B 123, 2 (2017).
 38.
Delaunay, C., Ozeri, R., Perez, G. & Soreq, Y. Probing atomic higgslike forces at the precision frontier. Phys. Rev. D. 96, 093001 (2017).
 39.
Frugiuele, C., Fuchs, E., Perez, G. & Schlaffer, M. Constraining new physics models with isotope shift spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. D. 96, 015011 (2017).
 40.
Berengut, J. C. et al. Probing new longrange interactions by isotope shift spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 091801 (2018).
 41.
Flambaum, V. V., Geddes, A. J. & Viatkina, A. V. Isotope shift, nonlinearity of king plots, and the search for new particles. Phys. Rev. A. 97, 032510 (2018).
 42.
Staanum, P. F., Højbjerre, K. & Drewsen, M. in Raymond E. March, John F.J Todd editors. Practical Aspects of Trapped Ion Mass Spectrometry, Volume V, Modern mass spectrometry (CRC Press, Boca Raton 2010).
 43.
Sturm, S. et al. Highprecision measurement of the atomic mass of the electron. Nature 506, 467–470, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature13026.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE20140220 (2014).
 44.
Ulmer, S. et al. Highprecision comparison of the antiprotontoproton chargetomass ratio. Nature 524, 196–199, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v524/n7564/full/nature14861.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE20150813spMailingID=49306476spUserID=MjA1NTA5MDEyMwS2spJobID=741956713spReportId=NzQxOTU2NzEzS0 (2015).
 45.
Barrett, B., Bertoldi, A. & Bouyer, P. Inertial quantum sensors using light and matter. Phys. Scr. 91, 053006 (2016).
 46.
Ding, S., Maslennikov, G., Hablützel, R. & Matsukevich, D. Crosskerr nonlinearity for phonon counting. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 193602 (2017).
 47.
Carruthers, P. & Nieto, M. M. Coherent states and the forced quantum oscillator. Am. J. Phys. 33, 537–544, http://link.aip.org/link/?AJP/33/537/1 (1965).
 48.
Stobiska, M., Villar, A. S. & Leuchs, G. Generation of Kerr nonGaussian motional states of trapped ions. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 94, 54002 http://stacks.iop.org/02955075/94/i=5/a=54002 (2011).
 49.
Bermudez, A., Schmidt, P. O., Plenio, M. B. & Retzker, A. Robust trappedion quantum logic gates by continuous dynamical decoupling. Phys. Rev. A. 85, 040302 (2012).
 50.
Pezzè, L. & Smerzi, A. Quantum theory of phase estimation. Proc. Int. School Phys. Enrico Fermi http://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospressISSNISBNissn=0074784X volume=188 spage=691 (2014).
 51.
Braunstein, S. L. & Caves, C. M. Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3439–3443 (1994).
 52.
Helstrom, C. W. Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory (Academic Press, New York, NY, 1976).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from the DFG through CRC 1227 (DQmat), projects A06 and B05, and the state of Lower Saxony, Hannover, Germany. M.G. acknowledges support by the Alexander von Humboldt foundation.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
F.W. developed the quantumenhanced measurement scheme and wrote the main part of the manuscript. F.W. and C.S. with the help of J.C.H. carried out the measurements. M.S., K.H., M.G., L.P., and A.S. provided the theoretical framework. P.O.S. conceived and supervised the experiment. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source Data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wolf, F., Shi, C., Heip, J.C. et al. Motional Fock states for quantumenhanced amplitude and phase measurements with trapped ions. Nat Commun 10, 2929 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467019105764
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Squeezed Coherent States in Double Optical Resonance
Photonics (2021)

Weakly invasive metrology: quantum advantage and physical implementations
Quantum (2021)

Continuously Parametrized Quantum Simulation of Molecular ElectronTransfer Reactions
PRX Quantum (2021)

Blockade of phonon hopping in trapped ions in the presence of multiple local phonons
Physical Review A (2021)

Photonic quantum metrology
AVS Quantum Science (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.