Article | Open | Published:

Extracellular vesicles from CLEC2-activated platelets enhance dengue virus-induced lethality via CLEC5A/TLR2

Abstract

Platelet-leukocyte interactions amplify inflammatory reactions, but the underlying mechanism is still unclear. CLEC5A and CLEC2 are spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk)-coupled C-type lectin receptors, abundantly expressed by leukocytes and platelets, respectively. Whereas CLEC5A is a pattern recognition receptor (PRR) to flaviviruses and bacteria, CLEC2 is the receptor for platelet-activating snake venom aggretin. Here we show that dengue virus (DV) activates platelets via CLEC2 to release extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes (EXOs) and microvesicles (MVs). DV-induced EXOs (DV-EXOs) and MVs (DV-MVs) further activate CLEC5A and TLR2 on neutrophils and macrophages, thereby induce neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation and proinflammatory cytokine release. Compared to  stat1−/− mice, simultaneous blockade of CLEC5A and TLR2 effectively attenuates DV-induced inflammatory response and increases survival rate from 30 to 90%. The identification of critical roles of CLEC2 and CLEC5A/TLR2 in platelet-leukocyte interactions will support the development of novel strategies to treat acute viral infection in the future.

Introduction

Acute viral infections frequently cause severe inflammatory reactions such as cytokine storms via the activation of platelets and leukocytes. While platelet–leukocyte interactions are key to the regulation of inflammation they also contribute to the pathogenesis of infectious diseases and play a critical role in vascular injury, thrombosis, and autoimmunity1,2,3. Dengue virus (DV) is the most common arbovirus, with ~2.5 billion people worldwide being at risk of infection4,5. DV infection has been shown to activate macrophages and platelets to secrete proinflammatory cytokines and extracellular vesicles (EVs)6,7,8,9; the most severe responses to DV are systemic inflammation and increased vascular permeability. Here, we investigated how DV activates platelets and leukocytes, and whether DV-induced leukocyte–platelet interactions contribute to disease severity.

Previous studies demonstrated that CLEC5A is the myeloid PRR for DV, Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)10 and type A influenza viruses (IAVs)11. Moreover, activation of CLEC5A triggers NALP3 inflammasome activation and proinflammatory cytokine release7,8,12, thereby inducing increased systemic vascular permeability and hemorrhagic shock8,13. However, blockade of CLEC5A only provides partial protection in mice challenged with lethal doses of DV13 and H5N1 IAV11. These observations suggest that innate immune receptor(s) other than CLEC5A is(are) involved in DV and H5N1 IAV-induced inflammatory reactions. Recently, we demonstrated that CLEC5A recognizes GlcNAc-MurNAc disaccharides of bacterial peptidoglycans, and is co-activated with toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) by Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus, thereby inducing NET formation and proinflammatory cytokine release14. This observation indicates that CLEC5A works closely with TLR2 in pathogen-induced inflammatory reactions.

Similar to other myeloid cells, platelets express abundant innate immune receptors, including TLRs, lectins, collagen receptors, and integrins, allowing them to sense various pathogens and initiate inflammatory reactions15,16. Previous studies showed that DV activates platelets to release IL-1β-containing microparticles (also denoted as EVs) and increases vascular permeability9. EVs, including MVs and EXOs, are membranous vesicles secreted from platelets, hepatocytes, and other cell types17; they transfer proteins, microRNAs, peptides, and nucleic acids to recipient cells via membrane fusion to modulate cell functions. In addition, EVs bind to integrins, proteoglycans, lipid-binding proteins, and the phosphatidylserine receptor TIM4, to initiate intracellular signals17. Since platelets contribute to NET formation18, as well as producing EVs, after DV stimulation9 we were interested to identify the PRR responsible for DV-induced platelet activation.

Here we report that DV activates CLEC5A on neutrophils to induce NET formation. We also show that DV activates platelets via CLEC2, causing them to release EVs that further enhance NET formation and proinflammatory cytokine production through activation of CLEC5A and TLR2 on macrophages and neutrophils. Simultaneous blockade of CLEC5A and TLR2 not only inhibits NET formation and attenuates inflammation, but also dramatically reduces both DV-induced systemic vascular permeability and lethality. This study reveals the critical roles of CLEC2 and CLEC5A/TLR2 in platelet–leukocyte interactions, thereby supporting the development of novel strategies to reduce tissue damage and increase survival of patients with severe DV infection.

Results

DV activates platelets via CLEC2 to enhance NET formation

To determine whether CLEC2 is responsible for DV-induced platelet activation, we incubated DV (PL046 strain) with human platelets in the presence of an antagonistic anti-CLEC2 mAb (Fig. 1a). The expression of platelet activation markers (CD62p and CD63) and EVs numbers were both upregulated by DV; this phenomenon was suppressed by the anti-CLEC2 mAb (Fig. 1a). Moreover, upregulation of CD62p was abolished in mouse CLEC2−/− platelets stimulated with DV (NGC-N strain) and aggretin (CLEC2 ligand) (Fig. 1b). This observation demonstrates the critical role of CLEC2 in DV-induced platelet activation. It has been reported that activated platelets interact with neutrophils to amplify inflammatory reactions and NET formation1,18, thus we asked whether DV-activated platelets (DV-PLTs) contribute to NET formation. While DV alone was able to induce mild NET formation, this response was enhanced dramatically in the presence of platelets (Fig. 1c). Moreover, DV-PLTs-induced NET formation was inhibited by anti-CLEC2 mAb (Fig. 1d). Furthermore, CLEC2−/− platelets were unable to enhance NET formation (Fig. 1e), even when stimulated with DV or aggretin. These observations suggest that DV stimulation of CLEC2 on platelets enhances NET formation. The structure of NETs formed in response to DV and the expression of CLEC5A and CLEC2 by platelets and neutrophils are illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

DV activates platelets via CLEC2 to enhance NET formation. a Human platelets were pre-incubated with anti-CLEC2 mAb or isotype control mAb at room temperature for 15 min, followed by incubation with DV (PL046) at 37 °C for 1 h before subjected to flow cytometry analysis. b Platelets from WT and clec2−/− mice were incubated with DV (NCG-N strain) or aggretin for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by flow cytometry analysis. Data are presented as fold change in MFI over mock control. c Neutrophils were co-incubated with autologous platelets and DV for 3 h at 37 °C. DNA, histone, and MPO were detected by Hoechst 33342 (blue), anti-histone antibody (green), and anti-MPO antibody (red), respectively. d Human platelets were preincubated with isotype control or anti-CLEC2 mAb for 15 min before DV stimulation. e Mouse neutrophils were incubated with WT or clec2−/− platelets and stimulated with DV (NGC-N) or aggretin at 37 °C for 3 h. NET area was measured by immunofluorescence staining to determine the histone area (μm2). Data are mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test). Scale bar: 10 μm. Source data are provided as Source Data file

CLEC5A and TLR2 are responsible for DV-PLTs-induced NET formation

Since CLEC5A has been implicated in bacteria-induced NET formation14, we asked whether CLEC5A also contributes to DV-induced and DV-PLTs-induced NET formation. Neutrophils were incubated with DV in the presence of an anti-CLEC5A mAb for 3 h; confocal microscopy revealed that DV-induced NET formation was suppressed by anti-CLEC5A mAb in a dose-dependent manner, and was almost completely abolished at the highest concentration (300 μg/ml) of anti-CLEC5A mAb tested (Fig. 2a, left). However, DV-PLTs-induced NET formation was only partially inhibited by anti-CLEC5A mAb under the same conditions (Fig. 2a, right). This observation suggests that DV-PLTs trigger NET formation via both CLEC5A-dependent and CLEC5A-independent pathways. Previously, we demonstrated that bacteria co-activated CLEC5A and TLR2 to enhance NET formation14, thus we asked whether both receptors are involved in DV-PLTs-induced NET formation. While DV-PLTs-induced and aggretin-PLTs-induced NETs were partially inhibited by either anti-CLEC5A or anti-TLR2 mAbs, simultaneous blockade of both receptors almost completely suppressed NET formation (Fig. 2b). To further confirm the role of CLEC5A and TLR2 in NET formation, we incubated WT mouse platelets with mouse-adapted DV (NGC-N strain) in vitro for 3 h (MOI = 3), followed by addition of WT, clec5a−/−tlr2+/+, clec5a+/+tlr2−/−, and clec5a−/−tlr2−/− mouse neutrophils and observation of NET formation (Fig. 2c). While DV induced NET formation in WT and clec5a+/+tlr2−/− neutrophils, NET formation was not observed in clec5a−/−tlr2+/+ and clec5a−/−tlr2−/− neutrophils. In contrast, aggretin did not induce NET formation in any of the mouse neutrophils tested (Fig. 2c). In the presence of WT platelets, both DV-PLTs-induced and aggretin-PLTs-induced NET formation were partially inhibited in clec5a−/−tlr2+/+and clec5a+/+tlr2−/− neutrophils, and were almost completely abolished in clec5a−/−tlr2−/− neutrophils (Fig. 2c). Thus, we conclude that both DV-PLTs and aggretin-PLTs co-activate CLEC5A and TLR2 to induce NET formation.

Fig. 2
figure2

CLEC5A and TLR2 mediate DV-activated and DV-activated platelet-induced NET formation. a Human neutrophils were pre-treated with isotype control (300 μg/ml) or anti-CLEC5A mAb, followed by incubation with platelets and DV for 3 h at 37 °C. b Alternatively, neutrophils were pre-incubated with anti-CLEC5A mAb and anti-TLR2 mAb, followed by incubation with DV-activated platelets (MOI = 5) or aggretin-activated platelets at 37 °C for 3 h. c Neutrophils from WT (clec5a+/+tlr2+/+), clec5a−/−tlr2+/+, clec5a+/+tlr2−/−, and clec5a−/−tlr2−/− mice were incubated with WT platelets in the presence of DV (NGC-N) for 3 h at 37 °C. NETs were measured by immunofluorescence staining (μm2). Data are mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test). Source data are provided as Source Data file

DV-induced EVs contribute to platelet-induced NET formation

Because EVs released from DV-activated platelets (DV-EVs) play critical roles in homeostasis and disease19,20, we asked whether DV-EVs contribute to platelet-mediated enhancement of NET formation. Platelets were pre-incubated with anti-CLEC2 mAb for 15 min after which DV-PLTs-induced expression of CD62p and CD63 was determined in CD41+ EVs by flow cytometry. While DV-PLTs upregulated the expression of CD62p and CD63 in CD41+ EVs, anti-CLEC2 mAb effectively suppressed this (Fig. 3a). We further compared the abilities of DV-PLTs and DV-EVs to induce NET formation (Fig. 3b). We found that DV-EVs and aggretin-EVs induced NET formation with similar potencies to DV-PLTs and aggretin-PLTs (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, EVs from anti-CLEC2 mAb-pretreated platelets had significantly reduced capacity to induce NET formation, suggesting that activation of CLEC2 is required to produce EVs with this activity (Fig. 3c). Similar to DV-PLTs (Fig. 2b), DV-EVs-induced NET formation was almost completely abolished by anti-CLEC5A and anti-TLR2 mAbs (Fig. 3d). Thus, we conclude that platelet-mediated enhancement of NET formation occurs via DV-EVs released from CLEC2-activated platelets.

Fig. 3
figure3

DV stimulates platelets to release EVs that induce NET formation via CLEC2. a Human platelets were incubated with DV (PL046) at 37 °C for 1 h in the presence or absence of anti-CLEC2 mAb, followed by harvesting of EVs by centrifugation for flow cytometry analysis. b Human platelets were incubated with DV (MOI = 0.5) or aggretin (3 nM) at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by harvesting EVs by ultracentrifugation. Both activated platelets and PLT-EVs were incubated with neutrophils and NET formation was observed. c Human platelets (8 × 106) were preincubated with isotype control or anti-CLEC2 mAb for 15 min before DV (MOI = 0.5) stimulation, followed by harvesting EVs to stimulate human neutrophils and observation of NET formation. d Neutrophils (8 × 105) were pre-pretreated with isotype control, anti-CLEC5A mAb, or anti-TLR2 mAb at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by incubation with EVs isolated from DV-PLTs (8 × 106) and aggretin-PLTs at 37 °C for 3 h. NETs were measured by immunofluorescence staining (μm2). Data are mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test). Source data are provided as Source Data file

Differential effects of microvesicles and exosomes on NET formation

We purified DV-EVs by centrifugation for nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). We found that the numbers of EXOs (50–100 nm) and MVs (>100 nm) from activated platelets were increased after incubation with aggretin and DV, respectively (Fig. 4a). EVs from DV-activated and aggretin-activated platelets mainly fell in the size range 50–150 nm, which is similar to the size distribution of EVs from thrombin-activated platelets (Fig. 4b). In addition, similar expression levels of CD41, HSP70, CD63, CD9, and CD81 were determined in activated platelets and EVs (Fig. 4c). Interestingly, DV-EXOs-induced and aggretin-EXOs-induced NET formation were inhibited efficiently by anti-CLEC5A mAb (Fig. 4d), while DV-MVs-induced and aggretin-MVs-induced NET formation were preferentially inhibited by anti-TLR2 mAb (Fig. 4e). Thus, we conclude that EXOs and MVs from CLEC2-activated platelets preferentially activate CLEC5A and TLR2, respectively, to induce NET formation.

Fig. 4
figure4

CLEC2-activated platelets release EVs to induce NETosis via TLR2 and CLEC5A. a and b Human platelets were incubated with DV (PL046), aggretin, or thrombin at 37 °C for 1 h, and microvesicles (MVs) and exosomes (EXOs) were harvested by sequential ultracentrifugation from supernatants, followed by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). c PLT lysates and EVs from platelets were fractionated on SDS–PAGE and subjected to western blotting with anti-CD41, anti-HSP70, anti-CD63, anti-CD9, and anti-CD81 mAbs. d and e Neutrophils were pre-incubated with anti-CLEC5A mAb and anti-TLR2 mAb, followed by incubation with microvesicles (1.5 × 108) and exosomes (1.5 × 108) from aggretin-PLTs or DV-PLTs at 37 °C for 3 h. Data are mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (mock versus aggretin-MVs or DV-MVs); ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 (mock versus aggretin-MVs or DV-EXOs) (Student’s t-test). Source data are provided as Source Data file

DV-induced NETs contribute to increased vascular permeability

We further asked whether DV-induced NETs contribute to increased vascular permeability. As DV-PLTs tended to adhere to endothelial cells, DV-EVs were used in their place for in vitro permeability assays. Whilst large increases in endothelial monolayer permeability were seen in the presence of neutrophils (black bar, Fig. 5a), DNase I reduced this to the same level as DV alone (black bar, Fig. 5a). Furthermore, whereas EVs from non-activated platelets had no effect on permeability (open slashed bar, Fig. 5a), DV-EVs substantially increased permeability and this effect was further enhanced in the presence of neutrophils (black slashed bar, Fig. 5a). These observations suggest that both DV-induced and DV-EVs-induced permeability changes are enhanced by NETs. To understand the roles of CLEC5A and TLR2 in DV-EVs-induced permeability changes, HMEC-1 endothelial cells were incubated with DV-EVs and neutrophils, in the presence or absence of anti-CLEC5A mAb and/or anti-TLR2-blocking antibodies (Fig. 5b). We found that blockade of both CLEC5A and TLR2 inhibited changes in the permeability of endothelial monolayers more effectively than blockade of either CLEC5A or TLR2 alone. We further examined the role of DV-induced NETs in enhancing vascular permeability in vivo using the Evans Blue assay. We observed that permeability changes in vital organs (spleen>small intestine>kidney>liver) after DV infection were inhibited efficiently by DNase I (Fig. 5c). Furthermore, anti-TLR2 mAb was able to further reduce permeability changes in stat1−/− and stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice (Fig. 5d). These observations suggest that DV-induced NETs contribute significantly to increases in systemic vascular permeability, and that blockade of CLEC5A and TLR2 is able to reduce NET formation and permeability changes in vivo.

Fig. 5
figure5

DV-induced NETs contribute to changes in vascular permeability. a and b Neutrophils were incubated with DV, EVs (from 8 × 106 platelets, including both MVs and EXOs), or DV-EVs (from 8 × 106 DV-activated platelets) and overlaid on HMEC-1 monolayers in presence or absence of DNase I (100 U/ml) at 37 °C for 3 h (a). Alternatively, neutrophils were pretreated with isotype control, anti-CLEC5A mAb, and anti-TLR2 mAb at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by incubation with DV or EVs (b). These assays used 1.5 × 108 EVs per experiment (a and b). Endothelial monolayer permeability was measured by determining HRP activity in media from the lower chamber. c Stat1−/− mice were challenged by intravenous administration of DV, in the presence or absence of DNase I, followed by injecting Evans blue (i.v.) at 1 h before sacrifice on day 5 post-infection (n = 4 in saline (vehicle) group, n = 3 in DNase I group). d Stat1−/− (n = 6 in saline and isotype control group, n = 4 in anti-TLR2 mAb group) and stat1−/−clec5a−/− (n = 5 in saline group, n = 4 in isotype control and anti-TLR2 mAb group) mice were pre-treated with anti-TLR2 mAb or isotype control, followed by inoculation with DV (NGC-N) via intraperitoneal route. Evans blue was injected intravenously at day 5 post-infection, 1 h before mice were sacrificed. Plasma leakage of visceral organs was determined by measuring absorbancies at 610 nm for each organ. Data are mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test). Source data are provided as Source Data file

DV-induced NET formation occurs via CLEC5A and TLR2 in vivo

We further examined NET formation after DV infection in vivo, where NETs were characterized by the presence of DNA (Hoechst 33342, blue), MPO (red), and histone (green) in mouse spleens (Supplementary Fig. 2) and quantified by determining the amounts of citrullinated histone H3 (Fig. 6a, c) and MPO (Fig. 6b, c) in spleens. We found that both citrullinated histone H3 and MPO were highly elevated in DV-infected stat1−/− mouse spleens (upper panels, Fig. 6a, b), but significantly reduced in stat1−/−clec5a−/− spleens (lower panels, Fig. 6a, b). Injection of DNase I or anti-TLR2 mAb further reduced the amounts of citrullinated histone and MPO (middle and right columns, Fig. 6a, b). Thus, we conclude that DV-induced NET formation in vivo occurs via activation of CLEC5A and TLR2.

Fig. 6
figure6

DV-induced NET formation in vivo occurs via CLEC5A and TLR2. a and b Stat1−/− and stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice were pre-treated with isotype control mAb, DNase I, and anti-TLR2 mAb, followed by inoculation with DV (NGC-N) via intraperitoneal route. Spleens were harvested and fixed at day 5 post-infection for immunohistochemical staining using anti-citrullinated histone H3 (Cit-H3) mAb (a) or anti-MPO mAb (b) (n = 3 per group). c Cit-H3 and MPO were quantified using MetaMorph image analysis software. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (compared with isotype control-injected stat1−/− mice); #p < 0.05, ###p < 0.001 (compared with isotype control-injected stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice) (Student’s t-test). Scale bar: 100 μm. Source data are provided as Source Data file

Simultaneous blockade of CLEC5A and TLR2 inhibits inflammation and increases survival of DV-infected mice

Proinflammatory cytokines play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic shock13, thus we asked whether DV-EVs also trigger proinflammatory cytokine release from macrophages. Compared to DV, DV-EVs induced higher amounts of TNF-α and IL-6 from macrophages (Fig. 7a). Moreover, both anti-CLEC5A mAb and anti-TLR2 mAb inhibited DV-EVs-induced proinflammatory cytokine release in vitro (Fig. 7b). We went on to examine the expression of proinflammatory cytokines in vivo. Compared to stat1−/− mice, stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice produced less proinflammatory cytokines after DV infection (Fig. 7c). Injection of anti-TLR2 mAb further suppressed proinflammatory cytokine production in stat1−/− and stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice (black columns, Fig. 7c). This observation suggests that DV infection leads to activation of CLEC5A-mediated and TLR2-mediated pathways to induce proinflammatory cytokine release.

Fig. 7
figure7

DV induces inflammatory response and lethality via CLEC5A and TLR2. a and b Human macrophages were incubated with DV or DV-EVs (including both MVs and EXOs) for 2 h at 37 °C, washed and then incubated for a further 24 h (a). Alternatively, cells were preincubated with anti-CLEC5A mAb and anti-TLR2 mAb for 1 h before addition of DVs (b). c Spleens of stat1−/− and stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice were collected at day 5 post DV-infection (as described in Fig. 6) and levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 mRNA were determined by RT-qPCR (n = 3 per group). d Stat1−/− mice (left panels, n = 9 in saline and isotype control group; n = 7 in anti-TLR2 mAb group) and stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice (right panels, n = 8 in saline; n = 7 in isotype control group and anti-TLR2 mAb group) were challenged with a lethal dose of DV via intraperitoneal route, and isotype control mAb (100 μg) or anti-TLR2 mAb (100 μg) were injected intraperitoneally at day 0, 2, 4, and 6 post-infection. Survival rate was measured daily up to day 21 post-infection. Data are mean ± SEM from at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Student’s t-test). Source data are provided as Source Data file

We investigated the protective effects of anti-TLR2 mAb in stat1−/− and stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice after DV infection. While all stat1−/− mice died by 16 days post-DV infection, stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice were more resistant to DV infection (30% survival at 21 days). Anti-TLR2 mAb delayed, but did not prevent, the death of stat1−/− mice after DV infection (left, Fig. 7d). However, anti-TLR2 mAb increased the survival rate of stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice to 90% after DV infection (right, Fig. 7d). These observations suggest that simultaneous blockade of TLR2 and CLEC5A can further reduce DV-induced inflammatory reactions and protect mice from DV-induced lethality.

Discussion

Serum levels of EVs are regarded as valuable biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes of DV infection21. However, whether EVs contribute to the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic shock had not been addressed prior to this study. Here, we have demonstrated that DV activates CLEC2 in platelets to release EVs, thereby enhancing NET formation and proinflammatory cytokine release via the activation of CLEC5A and TLR2 in neutrophils and macrophages. Simultaneous blockade of CLEC5A and TLR2 was found to increase the survival rates of mice infected with DV (90% survival), whereas we, and others13, have shown that blockade of CLEC5A alone only provides partial protection against DV-induced lethality. Moreover, removal of NETs by DNase I in vivo had some protective effect in stat1−/− mice (35% survival) (left, Supplementary Fig. 3), supporting the notion that NETs are involved in the complex interaction between platelets, macrophages, and neutrophils during DV infection. In contrast, DNase I did not enhance the survival of DV-challenged stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice (right, Supplementary Fig. 3), which did not have obvious NET formation after DV challenge. These observations suggest that DV-induced NET formation exerts a pathogenic effect by contributing to increased systemic vascular permeability during DV infection.

The role of virus-induced NETs in host defense against viral infections remains controversial22,23. NETs can protect the host from infection with HIV and pox virus via sequestration and neutralization of virus24. On the other hand, local NET deposition contributes to RSV-induced inflammatory reactions25 and to IAV-induced lung injury26. Moreover, increased NET formation is associated with the severe form of DV infection—dengue hemorrhagic fever27. Therefore, the roles of NETs seem to depend on the complex interplay between individual viruses and host cells. Here, we have demonstrated that DV not only activates macrophages and neutrophils through stimulation of CLEC5A, but also activates platelets to release EVs via CLEC2. Increased systemic vascular permeability contributes significantly to DV-induced mortality and enhanced NET formation is known to impair endothelial integrity and aggravate plasma leakage. This is consistent with our observation that, blockade of NET formation maintains vascular integrity and prevents increases in systemic permeability, thereby protecting mice from DV-induced lethality.

CLEC2 has been reported to play a critical role in hemostasis and thrombosis16, and is required for efficient binding of HIV-1 to platelets28. In this study, we demonstrate that CLEC2 is a novel PRR for DV, and that CLEC2-activated platelets release EVs, thereby enhancing NET formation and inflammatory reactions, following DV infection. While EVs from tumor cells transfer nucleic acids and proteins to target cells to suppress the immune system and facilitate tumor growth18, we have shown that DV-EVs activate neutrophils and macrophages to enhance NET formation and proinflammatory cytokine release. In addition to DV, we have also found that IAV (H5N1) activate platelets to release EVs via CLEC2, thereby enhancing NET formation (Supplementary Fig. 4). This observation further supports a critical role for CLEC2 and platelets in the pathogenesis of viral infection. Interestingly, LPS-activated and thrombin-activated platelets have similar functions to DV-activated and aggretin-activated platelets, i.e. enhancing NET formation via CLEC5A and TLR2 (Supplementary Fig. 5). Thus, both CLEC2-dependent and CLEC2-independent pathways contribute to enhanced NET formation in response to EVs from activated platelets. Recently, we reported that CLEC5A and TLR2 were co-activated by Listeria and Staphylococcus to induce NET formation and inflammatory cytokine release14. In this study, we further demonstrated that activated platelets can release EVs to enhance NET formation via CLEC5A (DV-EXOs) and TLR2 (DV-MVs). Thus, co-activation of CLEC5A and TLR2 seems to be a common pathway leading to NET formation in response to pathogens and other danger signals.

It has been demonstrated that CLEC5A colocalizes with mannose receptor (MR) and DC-SIGN in the presence of DV, where both MR and DC-SIGN display higher binding affinities for DV compared to CLEC5A, and DV-induced CLEC5A activation is dependent on DC-SIGN and MR29. Based on imaging analysis, the authors concluded that CLEC5A, DC-SIGN, and MR form a hetero-multivalent receptor complex upon engagement with DV29 that has high affinity for the virus and enables signaling via CLEC5A. While we have demonstrated that DV-mediated activation of platelets occurs via CLEC2, Watson et al. reported that interaction of CLEC2 with DV was not detectable30. However, DV has been shown to bind platelets via DC-SIGN31, suggesting that DV could activate CLEC2 via binding to a DC-SIGN/CLEC2 hetero-multivalent receptor complex, despite having low affinity for CLEC2.

We have found that DV-EVs purified by ultracentrifugation have low levels of contamination with DV as revealed by plaque assay and PCR (~150–200 pfu/ml, Supplementary Fig. 6). However, low titer DV did not induce NET formation, and a DV neutralizing antibody did not abolish DV-EVs-induced NET formation. All these observations suggest that NET formation is mainly induced by EVs from activated platelets, and not by the contaminating DV in DV-EVs preparations.

We performed mass spectrometry to identify components of DV-EXOs and DV-MVs capable of enhancing NET formation. Among the 234 peptides detected by mass spectrometry, tubulin beta 1 chain (TUBB1), guanine nucleotide-binding protein (GNG3), tribbles homolog 1 (TRIB1), vinculin (VCL), coagulation factor XIIIa chain (F13A1), and calnexin (CANX) were upregulated by both aggretin and DV (Supplementary Table 1). It has been shown that cytoskeleton components32 and chaperones33 are endogenous danger signals capable of activating innate immunity receptors. Cytoskeletal F-actin has been identified as a ligand for C-type lectin 9A (CLEC9A)34, while the chaperone HSP70 is a ligand for TLR2 and TLR435. Thus, it would be interesting to determine whether TUBB1, VCL (components of cytoskeleton), and CANX (an endoplasmic reticulum chaperone) are able to activate CLEC5A and TLR2. In addition to protein component, it is becoming apparent that glycosylation is an important factor in EVs function36. In this regard, it would be interesting to investigate whether glycans on DV-MVs and DV-EXOs contribute to the activation of CLEC5A and TLR2.

A high-density core region was found in DV-activated MVs, but not in aggretin-activated MVs (Supplementary Fig. 7). Mass spectrometry analysis, identifed 12 peptides upregulated by DV, but not by aggretin; these corresponded to proteins including the homeobox protein PKNOX2, isoform 20 of cAMP-responsive element modulator (CREM), POTE ankyrin domain family member I, cell division control protein 42 (CDC42) homolog, protein SSUH2 homolog, PRAME family member 9, ARF GTPase-activating protein (GIT2), LPS-responsive and beige-like anchor protein (LRBA), protein crumbs homolog 1/3 (CRB1/3), threonine aspartase 1 (TASP1), probable ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 4 (MINDY-4), and isoform 2/3 of calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated protein 2 (CAMSAP2). It will be interesting to examine whether these proteins are present in the core region of DV-MVs (Supplementary Fig. 7) and whether they have any immunomodulatory functions.

While previous reports showed that platelets became apoptotic after incubation with DV for 6–96 h37,38, we did not observe platelet apoptosis after incubation with DV PL046 (human) or NGC-N strains for short period (1–3 h). Instead, we found that DV activated CLEC2 in platelets to release EVs, which further enhanced DV-induced NET formation and inflammatory reactions. This observation is in accord with a previous report that EV levels correlate with disease severity in dengue patients21, and supports the argument that neutrophil–platelet interactions contribute to enhanced inflammatory reactions during DV infection39.

This study further illustrates the critical role of C-type lectin receptors and TLR2 in platelet–leukocyte interactions during viral infections (Fig. 8), and supports the notion that platelets are central to host immune responses to virus40. DC-SIGN and CLEC2 in platelets capture human immunodeficiency virus to promote virus spreading28, while DC-SIGN captures DV to facilitate virus replication in platelets31. In addition, DV can activate CLEC2 to trigger the NALP3 inflammasome and induce IL-1β release from platelets9,38, thereby enhancing proinflammatory cytokine release and NET formation via CLEC5A and TLR2. Histone 2A has been shown to activate platelets and enhance inflammatory reactions in patients infected with DV41; therefore, DV-induced NETs could further amplify neutrophil–platelet interaction via the release of histone 2A and other nuclear components to activate platelets. Moreover, IAV H5N1 also stimulates CLEC2 to produce EVs and enhance NET formation. These observations suggest that activation of CLEC2 and CLEC5A/TLR2 in platelets and leukocytes by DV and IAV contributes significantly to disease severity, and simultaneous blockade of CLEC5A and TLR2 has a great potential to treat DV, IAV, and other viral infections in the future.

Fig. 8
figure8

EVs play critical roles in the pathogenesis of viral infectons. DV activates macrophages and neutrophils via CLEC5A. DV also stimulate CLEC2 on platelets to promote release of EVs (DV-EXOs and DV-MVs), which further enhance the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and NET formation in neutrophils via CLEC5A and TLR2

Methods

Reagents and antibodies

Culture media/supplements were purchased from Invitrogen GIBCO. Chemical reagents were from Sigma. Granulocyte–macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was from R&D system. Antibodies for flow cytometry were purchased from BioLegend: anti-human CD41 antibody (#303710), anti-mouse CD41 antibody (#133914), anti-human CD63 antibody (#353006), anti-mouse CLEC2 antibody (#146103), anti-human/mouse TLR2 antibody (#153002); anti-human CD62p antibody (#304906); anti-mouse CD62p antibody (#561923). Mouse anti-human CLEC2 antibody (clone AYP1) for immunofluorescence staining was provided by Steve P Watson (University of Birmingham, UK); other primary antibodies for immunostaining were mouse anti-human/mouse histone H1 antibody (#sc-8030; Santa Cruz), rabbit anti-human/mouse myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibody (#AF3667; R&D Systems). Secondary antibodies (The Jackson Laboratory) were: goat anti-rabbit (H+L) TRITC-conjugated antibody (#111-025-045), donkey anti-goat Alexa488-conjugated antibody (#705-545-147), goat anti-mouse (H+L) Alexa488-conjugated antibody (#115-545-146), rabbit anti-goat (H+L) HRP-conjugated antibody (#305-035-045), donkey anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated antibody (#711-035-152). Antibodies for Western blotting were: anit-CD9 (#EXOAB-CD9A-1), anti-CD63 (#EXOAB-CD63A-1), anti-CD81 (#EXOAB-CD81A-1), and anti-HSP70 antibody (#EXOAB-Hsp70A-1) all from System Biosciences; anti-CD41 (#13807S; Cell Signaling), anti-GAPDH (#MAB374; Millipore). Reagents for IHC staining were: anti-citrullinated Histone H3 (#NB100-57135; Novus), anti-human/mouse MPO antibody (#AF3667; R&D Systems). ELISA kits to detect TNF-α (#DY410) and IL-6 (#DY406) were purchased by R&D Systems.

Isolation of human primary cells

Human platelets and neutrophils were isolated from peripheral blood of drug-free healthy donors. Platelets were harvested by centrifugation at 230×g for 15 min at 24 °C, followed by centrifugation at 1000×g for 10 min at 24 °C. Pellets were re-suspended with Tyrode’s buffer (Sigma, T2397) containing 1/6 volumes of ACD anticoagulant and 1 μM PGI2, further centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min at 24 °C and resuspended in Tyrode’s buffer containing 1 μM PGI2 and 0.04 U/ml apyrase, then kept on an orbital shaker (50 rpm) at 24 °C. Before use, samples were subjected to centrifugation at 1000×g for 10 min at 24 °C and resuspended in Tyrode’s buffer (3.2 × 108 platelets/ml). Neutrophils were isolated using Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare, 45-001-748) gradient centrifugation at 500×g for 15 min, and pellets were resuspended in red blood cell lysis buffer, then washed once with saline (300×g, 5 min) before being resuspended in RPMI containing 10% (v/v) autologous serum. To obtain CD14+ monocyte-derived macrophages, CD14+ monocytes were isolated from human white blood cell concentrates (Taipei Blood Center,Taiwan) using anti-CD14 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, 130-050-201)8. CD14+ cells were cultured in RPMI containing 10% (v/v) FBS and 10 ng/ml human GM-CSF for 7 days at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The protocol was approved by the Human Subject Research Ethics, Academia Sinica (Taiwan, number AS-IRB-BM-16074).

Mice

C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the National Laboratory Animal Center (NLAC, Taiwan). clec5a−/−, stat1−/−, and stat1−/−clec5a−/− mice were generated in house8,12,13, while tlr2−/− and clec5a−/−tlr2−/− mice were generated as described in our previous work14. Clec2fl/fl mice were a generous gift from Dr. Steve P. Watson (University of Birmingham, UK), and PF4-Cre mice were the generous gift from Dr. Ching-Ping Tseng (Chang-Gung University, Taiwan). Clec2fl/fl mice were bred with PF4-Cre mice to generate platelet-specific clec2−/− mice42. All mice were bred and maintained in pathogen-free conditions at Academia Sinica SPF animal facility (AS core) and The Laboratory Animal Center of National Defense Medical Center. Animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at AS core (protocol ID 16-12-1033). In this study, we used 8–12-week-old male and female mice, and we did not observe any significant difference in response to virus infection between males and females.

Isolation of murine primary cells

To isolate murine platelets, blood samples were collected from the facial vein. The platelet-rich plasma was centrifuged at 1000×g, and platelets were resuspended in Tyrode’s buffer (3.2 × 108 platelets/ml) before use. To isolate murine neutrophils, mouse bone marrow cells were collected from femurs and tibias. After washing and RBC lysis, samples were resuspended in 45% percoll solution and laid on percoll gradient solution (with 81%, 62%, 52% percoll from bottom to top), followed by centrifugation at 1000×g for 30 min. Bone marrow-derived neutrophils were collected from layer 3 of the gradient solution. Cells were washed with HBSS solution and resuspended in RPMI containing 10% (v/v) FBS.

Cell lines

Mosquito C6/36 cells (ATCC, CRL-1660) were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS at 28 °C and 5% CO2. Hamster BHK-21 cells (ATCC, CCL-10) were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 5% FBS, while human HMEC-1 cells (ATCC, CRL-3243) were cultured in M200 medium (Gibco, #M200500) supplemented with low serum growth supplement (LSGS) (Gibco, #S00310). These two cell lines were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Trypsin–EDTA was used to detach cells from culture plates.

Virus strains and propagation

DV serotype 2 strains PL046 and New Guinea C-N (NGC-N) were propagated in C6/36 cells. Virus titers were determined by plaque assay in BHK-21 cells. Human and mouse blood cells were incubated with PL046 strain and NGC-N strain, respectively.

In vitro stimulation of platelets and collection of platelet-derived EVs

Human platelets were incubated with DV (MOI = 0.5 or 5) or aggretin (3, 10, or 100 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C, and the expression of CD62p and CD63 was determined by flow cytometry. Samples were subjected to centrifugation at 1500×g for 10 min at 24 °C to harvest the EVs-enriched supernatants.

Analysis of platelet-derived EVs by flow cytometry

Human platelets and CD41+ EVs were fixed with ThromboFix reagent (Beckman Coulter, #6607130) for 1 h at room temperature according to the vendor’s instruction, followed by incubation with APC-conjugated anti-CD41 mAb, FITC-conjugated anti-CD63 mAb, and PE-conjugated anti-CD62p mAb for 30 min at room temperature before being subjected to flow cytometry analysis. The numbers of EVs derived from activated platelets were extrapolated from EV counts obtained for 10,000 CD41+ platelets. The gating strategy is shown in Supplementary Fig. 8.

NTA of platelet-derived MVs and EXOs

DV (PL046)-containing supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000×g for 1 h at 4 °C to remove endogenous EVs in the culture medium before incubation with freshly purified human platelets (MOI = 0.5) at 37 °C for 1 h. Samples were then centrifugated at 1500×g for 15 min at room temperature to harvest the EVs-enriched supernatant, which was further subjected to centrifugation at 20,000×g for 40 min at 4 °C, and the pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of Tyrode’s buffer to harvest microvesicles. The supernatant was further subjected to centrifugation at 100,000×g for 1 h at 4 °C, and the pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of Tyrode’s buffer to harvest exosomes. The particle size and concentration of microvesicles (100–1000 nm) and exosomes (<100 nm) were determined by NTA (NanoSight NS300).

Stimulation and inhibition of platelets, neutrophils, and macrophages

Human neutrophils (8 × 105) were seeded onto poly-l-lysine-coated glass coverslips and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by incubation with DV (MOI = 5) in the presence or absence of autologous platelets (8 × 106) at 37 °C for 3 h. Alternatively, neutrophils were incubated with EVs (from 8 × 107 platelets) at 37 °C for 3 h. For blocking assays, neutrophils were pre-incubated with anti-human CLEC5A mAb (100 μg/ml), anti-TLR2 mAb (100 μg/ml), or isotype control for 1 h at 24 °C, while platelets were pre-treated with anti-human CLEC2 mAb (2.5 μg/ml, clone AYP1) for 15 min at 24 °C. Human macrophages (1 × 105 cells) were incubated with DV (MOI = 10) or DV-EVs (from 1 × 107 DV-PLTs) for 2 h at 37 °C, followed by washing with RPMI-1640 medium to remove DV and DV-EVs before incubation with fresh RPMI containg 10% (v/v) FBS for 24 h. For blocking assasy, macrophages (1 × 105) were preincubated with anti-CLEC5A mAb (10 μg/ml, clone 3E12A2), anti-TLR2 mAb (10 μg/ml), or isotype control at 37 °C for 1 h before incubation with DV or DV-EVs (from 1 × 107 DV-PLTs).

Cytokine measurement

The concentrations of cytokines in media from human macrophages were measured by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Determination of citrullinated histone and MPO by immunohistochemistry

To detect citrullinated histone and MPO in the spleen, specimens were fixed in 10% formalin for 24 h. Paraffin-embedded spleen sections were incubated at 70 °C for 1 h and deparaffinized in Xylene for 10 min twice. Samples were incubated in boiling citric acid (0.01 M, pH. 6.0) for 30 min, then cooled to room temperature for antigen retrieval. Samples were incubated with anti-citrullinated histone antibody (1:100) or anti-MPO antibody (1:100) at 4 °C overnight, then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:100) for 1 h at room temperature; HRP activity was determined using the Pierce® Peroxidase Detection Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #36000). Samples were counterstained with hematoxylin, and DAB signal was detected and quantified using Aperio ImageScope V9 and MetaMorph softwares.

Determination of NET structure by immunofluorescence staining

NET structure was determined by detection of citrullinated histone and MPO using confocal microscope14. In brief, neutrophils were suspended in RPMI with 10% (v/v) autologous serum and seeded on coverslips for 2 h. Cells were infected with either DV or EVs and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Fixed cells were subjected to membrane permeabilization using 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS, then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, and incubated with primary antibodies against anti-histone and MPO (1:100) at 4 °C overnight. Secondary antibodies conjugated with Alex488 or TRITC (1:100) were then added for 1 h at room temperature, and Hoechst 33342 was used as a counter stain. NET images were captured under a confocal microscope and analyzed with Leica Application Suite X software. To observe NETs in situ, mouse spleens were dissected, mounted in OCT and then frozen at −80 °C; 10 μm sections were used for immunofluorescence staining. Slides were fixed with cold acetone at 4 °C for 10 min, air dried for 30 min and then incubated with Hoechst 33342 and primary antibodies to histone and MPO (1:100) followed by fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:100). Images were collected with a Leica confocal microscope with white light laser system (TCS-SP5-MP-SMD) and analyzed using Leica Application Suite X software.

RNA isolation and real-time PCR

Mouse spleens were homogenized in 700 μl TRIzol reagent and RNA was isolated with TriRNA pure kit according to the vendor’s instructions. For reverse-transcription, the first-strand cDNA was synthesized using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit. Primer sequences for mouse TNF-α: forward 5′-gcctcttctcattcctgcttg-3′, reverse 5′-ctgatgagagggaggccatt-3′; mouse IL-1β: forward 5′-ggagaaccaagcaacgacaaaata-3′, reverse 5′-tggggaactctgcagactcaaac-3′; mouse IL-6: forward 5′-gaggataccactcccaacagac-3′, reverse 5′-aagtgcatcgttgttcataca-3′; mouse GAPDH: forward 5′-ggaggaacctgccaagtatg-3′, reverse 5′-tgggagttgctgttgaag-3′. Real-time PCR conditions comprised incubation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 58 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. The expression level of each gene was normalized to GADPH expression.

Endothelial cell permeability assay

Permeability of human dermal microvascular endothelial cell (HMEC-1) monolayers was determined by measuring the trans-endothelial passage of HRP after incubation with supernatants of DV-infected macrophages. Briefly, HMEC-1 (2 × 105) were seeded in 24-well collagen-coated and fibronectin-coated transwells (6.5 nm diameter, 0.4 μm pore size) and cultured in Medium 200 with LSGS. On day 1 post-plating, neutrophils (8 × 105) were laid on the monolayer of HMEC-1 and incubated with DV (MOI = 5) or DV-EVs (from 8 × 106 DV-PLTs) for 3 h. HRP (0.5 μg in 10 μl) was added to the upper chamber of the transwell for 15 min before harvesting medium from the lower chamber (10 μl). HRP activity was determined by incubating the media with TMB (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine) for 20 min, followed by determination of absorbancy at 450 nm after the addition of sulfuric acid to stop the reaction.

Quantitation of vascular permeability change

Mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with DV2 (New Guinea C-N) at 2 × 105 PFU/per mouse in 100 μl of saline. DNase I (4KU) and anti-mTLR2 mAb (BioLegend, #153002) or isotype control (100 μg) were injected intraperitoneally at days 0, 2, 4, 6 after DV infection. Evans blue (150 μl of 0.5% Evans blue) was administered intravenously into DV-challenged mice at day 5. At 1 h after injection, mice were sacrificed and organs were harvested. Organs were incubated in formamide (2 ml) at 55 °C for 2 h, and Evans blue was quantified by measuring absorbance at 610 nm.

Quantification of NET formation

NET formation was quantified by measuring histone area14. Neutrophils were seeded onto coverslips and processed as described above for determination of NET structure. Images were collected using a Leica confocal microscope and processed using Leica Application Suite X and MetaMorph software. Briefly, NETs were visualized in at least five random fields (×40 magnification), signal intensity of histone per field was individually measured and the pixels count for each image was converted into area (μm2) using a calibration unit (0.8333). Mean histone area (μm2) was determined from the five independent fields.

Western blot

Platelet lysates (5 μg) and platelet-derived EVs (25 μg) were fractionated on SDS–PAGE under non-reducing conditions before transfer onto PVDF membrane (Pall Corporation). The blots were probed with mAbs to detect CD markers and HSP70 (1:1000), followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:20,000) according to the manufacturer’s instruction (System Biosciences) and development with the SuperSignal® West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate kit (Thermo Scientific). All uncropped and unprocessed scans are supplied in the source data labeled as Fig. 4c.

Mass spectrometry analysis of platelet-derived EVs

Proteomic analysis was performed by the in house Mass Spectrometry Core Facility at the Genomic Research Center, Academia Sinica. EV samples were purified by ultracentrifugation as described in “Nanoparticle tracking analysis’ above. Platelet-derived MVs and EXOs were digested with trypsin before being subjected to tandem mass spectrometry analysis using the LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.).

Transmission electron microscopy

Samples were fixed with 1% (w/v) glutaraldehyde in PBS for 10 min, then loaded on a carbon/formvar-coated grid (5 µl each sample) and dried under vacuum for 20 min. Samples were incubated with 2% uranyl acetate (10 µl) for 30 s, then dried under vacuum for 20 min. The ultrastructure of each sample was observed by a transmission electron microscopy (FEG-TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 TF20 Super TWIN).

Statistics

All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (Version 5.0) and are presented as mean ± SEM. For two group comparisons, significance was determined using a two-tailed non-paired t-test. For multiple group comparisons, one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post hoc test was used for parametric data; Kruskal–Wallis analysis with the Dunn’s post hoc test was used for nonparametric data. Survival rate was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis. p-Values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The source data underlying Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4a, 4b, 4d, 4e, 5, 6c, 6d, 6d, 7b and 7c are provided as a Source Data file. Data that support this study are available within the main text and supplementary files, or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Zarbock, A., Polanowska-Grabowska, R. K. & Ley, K. Platelet–neutrophil-interactions: linking hemostasis and inflammation. Blood Rev. 21, 99–111 (2007).

  2. 2.

    Engelmann, B. & Massberg, S. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 34–45 (2013).

  3. 3.

    Ed Rainger, G. et al. The role of platelets in the recruitment of leukocytes during vascular disease. Platelets 26, 507–520 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Wilder-Smith, A. & Schwartz, E. Dengue in travelers. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 924–932 (2005).

  5. 5.

    Mackenzie, J. S., Gubler, D. J. & Petersen, L. R. Emerging flaviviruses: the spread and resurgence of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and dengue viruses. Nat. Med. 10, S98–S109 (2004).

  6. 6.

    Ogura, H. et al. Activated platelets enhance microparticle formation and platelet-leukocyte interaction in severe trauma and sepsis. J. Trauma 50, 801–809 (2001).

  7. 7.

    Wu, M. F., Chen, S. T. & Hsieh, S. L. Distinct regulation of dengue virus-induced inflammasome activation in human macrophage subsets. J. Biomed. Sci. 20, 36 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Wu, M. F. et al. CLEC5A is critical for dengue virus-induced inflammasome activation in human macrophages. Blood 121, 95–106 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Hottz, E. D. et al. Platelets mediate increased endothelium permeability in dengue through NLRP3-inflammasome activation. Blood 122, 3405–3414 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Chen, S. T. et al. CLEC5A regulates Japanese encephalitis virus-induced neuroinflammation and lethality. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002655 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Teng, O. et al. CLEC5A-mediated enhancement of the inflammatory response in myeloid cells contributes to influenza virus pathogenicity in vivo. J. Virol. 91, e01813–e01816 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Huang, Y. L. et al. CLEC5A is critical for dengue virus-induced osteoclast activation and bone homeostasis. J. Mol. Med. 94, 1025–1037 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Chen, S. T. et al. CLEC5A is critical for dengue-virus-induced lethal disease. Nature 453, 672–676 (2008).

  14. 14.

    Chen, S. T. et al. CLEC5A is a critical receptor in innate immunity against Listeria infection. Nat. Commun. 8, 299 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Semple, J. W., Italiano, J. E.Jr. & Freedman, J. Platelets and the immune continuum. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 264–274 (2011).

  16. 16.

    Assinger, A. Platelets and infection—an emerging role of platelets in viral infection. Front. Immunol. 5, 649 (2014).

  17. 17.

    van Niel, G., D’Angelo, G. & Raposo, G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 213–228 (2018).

  18. 18.

    Caudrillier, A. et al. Platelets induce neutrophil extracellular traps in transfusion-related acute lung injury. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 2661–2671 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Flaumenhaft, R., Mairuhu, A. T. & Italiano, J. E. Platelet- and megakaryocyte-derived microparticles. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 36, 881–887 (2010).

  20. 20.

    Italiano, J. E.Jr., Mairuhu, A. T. & Flaumenhaft, R. Clinical relevance of microparticles from platelets and megakaryocytes. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 17, 578–584 (2010).

  21. 21.

    Punyadee, N. et al. Microparticles provide a novel biomarker to predict severe clinical outcomes of dengue virus infection. J. Virol. 89, 1587–1607 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Jenne, C. N. & Kubes, P. Virus-induced NETs—critical component of host defense or pathogenic mediator? PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004546 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Schonrich, G. & Raftery, M. J. Neutrophil extracellular traps go viral. Front. Immunol. 7, 366 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Saitoh, T. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate a host defense response to human immunodeficiency virus-1. Cell Host Microbe 12, 109–116 (2012).

  25. 25.

    Cortjens, B. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps cause airway obstruction during respiratory syncytial virus disease. J. Pathol. 238, 401–411 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Narasaraju, T. et al. Excessive neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to acute lung injury of influenza pneumonitis. Am. J. Pathol. 179, 199–210 (2011).

  27. 27.

    Opasawatchai, A. et al. Neutrophil activation and early features of NET formation are associated with dengue virus infection in human. Front. Immunol. 9, 3007 (2018).

  28. 28.

    Chaipan, C. et al. DC-SIGN and CLEC-2 mediate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capture by platelets. J. Virol. 80, 8951–8960 (2006).

  29. 29.

    Lo, Y. L. et al. Dengue virus infection is through a cooperative interaction between a mannose receptor and CLEC5A on macrophage as a multivalent hetero-complex. PLoS One 11, e0166474 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Watson, A. A. et al. Structural flexibility of the macrophage dengue virus receptor CLEC5A: implications for ligand binding and signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 24208–24218 (2011).

  31. 31.

    Simon, A. Y., Sutherland, M. R. & Pryzdial, E. L. Dengue virus binding and replication by platelets. Blood 126, 378–385 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Mostowy, S. & Shenoy, A. R. The cytoskeleton in cell-autonomous immunity: structural determinants of host defence. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 559–573 (2015).

  33. 33.

    Vabulas, R. M., Wagner, H. & Schild, H. Heat shock proteins as ligands of toll-like receptors. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 270, 169–184 (2002).

  34. 34.

    Sancho, D. et al. Identification of a dendritic cell receptor that couples sensing of necrosis to immunity. Nature 458, 899–903 (2009).

  35. 35.

    Asea, A. et al. Novel signal transduction pathway utilized by extracellular HSP70: role of toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 15028–15034 (2002).

  36. 36.

    Williams, C. et al. Glycosylation of extracellular vesicles: current knowledge, tools and clinical perspectives. J. Extracell. Vesicles 7, 1442985 (2018).

  37. 37.

    Alonzo, M. T. et al. Platelet apoptosis and apoptotic platelet clearance by macrophages in secondary dengue virus infections. J. Infect. Dis. 205, 1321–1329 (2012).

  38. 38.

    Hottz, E. D. et al. Dengue induces platelet activation, mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death through mechanisms that involve DC-SIGN and caspases. J. Thromb. Haemost. 11, 951–962 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Hottz, E. D. et al. Platelet activation and apoptosis modulate monocyte inflammatory responses in dengue. J. Immunol. 193, 1864–1872 (2014).

  40. 40.

    Hottz, E. D., Bozza, F. A. & Bozza, P. T. Platelets in immune response to virus and immunopathology of viral infections. Front. Med. 5, 121 (2018).

  41. 41.

    Trugilho, M. R. O. et al. Platelet proteome reveals novel pathways of platelet activation and platelet-mediated immunoregulation in dengue. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006385 (2017).

  42. 42.

    Finney, B. A. et al. CLEC-2 and Syk in the megakaryocytic/platelet lineage are essential for development. Blood 119, 1747–1756 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Academia Sinica (106-2101-01-11-01、107-2101-01-18-03, AS-TP-106-L11, AS-TP-106-L11-1), and Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 107-2321-B-001-015, MOST 106-2320-B-001-023-MY3), and Summit and Thematic Research Projects (Academia Sinica), and VGH, TSGH, AS Joint Research Program (VTA107-V2-1-2). We thank the Taiwan Mouse Clinic (TMC) and Transgenic Mouse Model Core Facility (TMMC), which are funded by the National Research Program for Genomic Medicine (NRPGM) at the National Science Council of Taiwan, for technical support in histopathology experiments. We thank the Mass Spectrometry Core Facility of Genomic Research Center (Academia Sinica) for technical support in mass spectrometry analysis. We thank the Imaging Core Facility in the Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology (Academia Sinica) for TEM image processing. We thank Dr. Thierry Burnouf, Dr. Natalie Chou, Mrs. Li-Wen Lo, Ms. Tzu-Yun Hsu, Ms. Yi-An Chen, Mr. Heng-Yu Su, and Dr. Chun-Mei Hu for technical assistance. We are grateful to Dr. Ching-Ping Tseng (Chang-Gung University) for kindly providing the PF4-Cre mice to support this work. Special thanks go to Dr. Steve P. Watson who provided the antagonistic anti-human CLEC2 mAb (clone AYP1) and floxP-CLEC2-floxP mice. We also thank BioLegend for providing the antagonistic anti-TLR2 mAb (TLR2 mAb, clone QA16A01).

Author information

P.-S.S. designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper; T.-F.H. provided reagents and technical support; S.-L.H. was involved in experimental design, data analysis and manuscript writing.

Correspondence to Shie-Liang Hsieh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Dirk Pegtel, Patrícia Bozza and other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.