Synthesizing a ν=2/3 fractional quantum Hall effect edge state from counter-propagating ν=1 and ν=1/3 states

Abstract

Topological edge-reconstruction occurs in hole-conjugate states of the fractional quantum Hall effect. The frequently studied filling factor, ν = 2/3, was originally proposed to harbor two counter-propagating modes: a downstream v = 1 and an upstream v = 1/3. However, charge equilibration between these two modes always led to an observed downstream v = 2/3 charge mode accompanied by an upstream neutral mode. Here, we present an approach to synthetize a v = 2/3 edge mode from its basic counter-propagating charged constituents, allowing a controlled equilibration between the two counter-propagating charge modes. This platform is based on a carefully designed double-quantum-well, which hosts two populated electronic sub-bands (lower and upper), with corresponding filling factors, vl and vu. By separating the 2D plane to two gated intersecting halves, each with different fillings, counter-propagating chiral modes can be formed along the intersection line. Equilibration between these modes can be controlled with the top gates’ voltage and the magnetic field.

Introduction

In the quantum Hall effect (QHE) regime, charge propagation takes place via downstream chiral edge modes while the bulk is insulating. In the integer QHE (IQHE), the number of downstream edge modes is equal to the number of occupied “spin-split” Landau levels (LLs); each contributes a single edge mode. On the other hand, in the fractional QHE (FQHE) regime, where electron–electron interaction plays a crucial role, the edge profile can be much richer, hosting downstream as well as upstream chiral edge modes1,2,3.

It was predicted, nearly 30 years ago4,5, that the edge structure of the so-called “hole-conjugate” states in the FQHE regime (i + 1/3 < ν < i + 1, where i is an integer and ν the fractional filling factor) should host counter-propagating modes. The most studied is the ν = 2/3 state, with a downstream v = 1 mode and an upstream v = 1/3 mode (Fig. 1a). In the absence of coupling between these modes, this edge structure should yield a “two-terminal” conductance of G2T = 4e2/3h (Fig. 1b). In practice, however, the measured conductance is always G2T = 2e2/3h—supporting a single downstream v = 2/3 charge mode and an upstream neutral mode. The experimental ubiquity of the latter conductance value becomes even more remarkable if one recalls that the v = 2/3 edge profile may involve a more complicated edge reconstruction, as was shown theoretically6,7 and experimentally8,9,10.

Fig. 1
figure1

The 2/3 hole-conjugate state and its synthetized form. a The unequilibrated v = 2/3 state; composed of two counter-propagating chiral modes: a downstream v = 1 mode and an upstream v = 1/3 Laughlin excitation mode. Red and blue represent electron density profile of independent v = 1 and v = 1/3 modes at the edges, respectively. b Equivalent two-terminal conductance in the unequilibrated regime. c The inter-edge scattering results in edge density profile reconstruction: coexistence of a downstream v = 2/3 mode and an upstream neutral mode. d Equivalent two-terminal conductance in the equilibrated regime. e Schematics of the device. A v = 1 edge mode of the first LL belonging to SB1 and having spin ↑, flows around the whole region of the sample. A v = 1 edge mode of the first LL belonging to SB2, having spin ↑, flows only around the upper region. A v = 1/3 mode of the second LL of SB1, having spin ↓, flows around the lower region. Thus, at the interface of the two regions, a v = 1 and a v = 1/3 modes counterpropagate

A crucial step toward an explanation of an emergent state characterized by G2T = 2e2/3h was performed by Kane et al.11,12 (KFP), who allowed random tunneling between the counterpropagating edge modes (due to disorder) accompanied by inter-mode interaction (Fig. 1c, d). A recent theoretical work13,14 (PGM) expanded the KFP analysis and predicted that, for temperature T > 0 and with increasing system length (or, alternatively, with increasing random tunneling strength), the system undergoes a crossover from a clean, non-equilibrated state with two counterpropagating charge modes and G2T = 4e2/3h, to an equilibrated regime with G2T = 2e2/3h accompanied by neutral modes.

While the existence of a neutral mode, which can transport energy upstream, had been confirmed by Bid et al.15 and other works16,17,18,19, the full clean-to-equilibrated transition, as predicted by the theory of KFP and PGM, has never been observed. A controlled experimental study of this transition and of the physics involved is missing entirely.

Here, we aim to observe this transition. Our platform is based on a carefully designed double-quantum-well structure (DQW, in a GaAs-based heterostructure), with two populated electronic sub-bands—each tuned separately to the QHE regime (Supplementary Note 1). By top-gating different areas of the structure, the desired counterpropagating modes between v = 1 and v = 1/3 can be formed, with a highly controlled inter-mode coupling. We observes the expected full transition of G2T from 4e2/3h to 2e2/3h accompanied by (diffusive) neutral modes.

Results

Forming counterpropagating edge modes

We characterize the system by a generalized filling factor v = (vl, vu), where vl (vu) is the filling factor in the lower subband, SB1 (higher subband, SB2)20. With a clever design of the QW, the densities of the two SBs are misplaced from each other in the growth direction (here, a 0.7 -nm-thick AlAs barrier in the center of the QW decreases the coupling strength between the two SBs’ wavefunctions). Our device is formed by three horizontal top gates, separating the 2D plane into three regions: upper, center, and lower. Each gate controls the filling factor in the 2DEG underneath it, as shown in Fig. 2a. A 2D plot of the longitudinal resistance, Rxx, of the upper region (measured when the adjacent region is pinched off), is plotted as function of the magnetic field B and its top-gate voltage, Vg1 (Fig. 2b, c). The generalized filling factors that correspond to the Hall plateaus are determined by the dark blue regions, where Rxx = 0, with the current carried by edge modes. Figure 2c is a zoom-in on the “interesting” region, where the generalized filling factors (4/3,0) and (1,1) can be reached by tuning the gates’ voltage at a constant magnetic field along the broken yellow lines. For example, at B = 6 T, the upper region is at (1,1) at a gate voltage span Vg1 = 0.02–0.1 V, and the center region is at (4/3,0) at Vg2 = −0.18 to ~−0.2 V.

Fig. 2
figure2

Device SEM image and fan diagram for the 2DEG. a Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph of the studied device, which is fabricated in a 2DEG embedded in a GaAs/AlGaAs double-quantum well structure. It consists of the upper (light purple), center (brown), and lower (light purple) regions, and the density in each region can be independently controlled by its own top gate, with voltages Vg1, Vg2, and Vg3. A few ohmic contacts are located at the interfaces between two regions (dark yellow squares) and others located away to measure the generalized fillings of the three regions (dark serrated yellow squares). Each source (S) is placed in-between two drains (D) in order to measure two-terminal conductance. b 2D mapping of the longitudinal resistance, RXX, versus magnetic field and gate voltage Vg1 at T = 20 mK. Data are obtained from the ohmic contacts along the edge of the upper region, in a quantum well with 0.7 -nm-thick AlAs barrier, with the adjacent region pinched off. c The zoom-in on the “interesting” region used in our work. The white and red dashed lines represent the non-interacting spin-split Landau levels—LL2 in SB1 and LL1 in SB2, respectively. The field Bc describes the magnetic field where non-interacting subbands cross and hybridize. The clear vertical square (containing the yellow dashed lines) illustrates the region in magnetic field where a transition between the generalized fillings of v = (1,1) and v = (4/3,0) can be tuned

By setting the upper and center regions to v = (1,1) and v = (4/3,0), respectively, the scenario shown in Fig. 1e occurs. The lowest LL of SB1 (e.g., (1, ↑)SB1), is full in both regions, and thus a v = 1 edge mode, with spin ↑, flows along the circumference of the whole region of the sample (with no difficulty to enter the v = 4/3 state in the center region). The lowest LL of SB2 (e.g., (1, ↑)SB2), is also full in the upper region and empty in the center region, and thus v = 1 edge mode with spin ↑ is flowing only around the upper region, and in the interface between the two regions. Similarly, the second LL of SB1 (e.g., (1,↓)SB1) is in v = 1/3 filling in the center region and empty in the upper region; hence, a v = 1/3 edge mode with spin ↓ is flowing only around the center region and counterpropagating at the interface between the regions.

The fan diagram shows LLs belonging to SB1 and SB2, and their revolution as they cross and hybridize in a certain range of magnetic field and gate voltage. The size of the gap is determined by the coupling between the LLs (depends on the lateral separation of the modes and the thickness of the AlAs barrier). Note the emergent gap appearing between the LLs that corresponds to filings vl = vu = 1 of the (1,1) and (2,0) fillings in Fig. 2c (white circle). One can also observe LLs crossing without an opening of a gap in a similar structure where the AlAs barrier is thicker (Supplementary Note 2).

Length and magnetic field dependence

The fabricated device contained a series of ohmic contacts, placed on the interfaces between the top and bottom regions and the center region, being separated by various distances. Each source contact was placed midway between two grounded drains (Fig. 2a). The two-terminal conductance, G2T, was measured between source and ground for several source–drains separation lengths, using a standard lock-in technique at fridge temperature of 20 mK. The evolved conductance with the filling in the center region tuned from v = (1,0) to v = (4/3,0), while keeping the upper and lower regions are at v = (1,1), is shown in Fig. 3a for B = 6.45 T. It mimics the transition shown in Fig. 1. The highlighted region in red corresponds to the center region being at filling (1,0), thus supporting a single downstream integer mode (at the top or bottom interfaces) with the conductance equals e2/h—independent of the propagation length. Once the gate voltage of the center region was increased, placing its filling at v = (4/3,0), an evolution of the two-terminal conductance, from G2T = 4e2/3h at a short distance (6 µm) to G2T = 2e2/3h at a long distance (150 µm) was observed (highlighted in blue in Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3
figure3

Length and magnetic field dependent two-terminal conductance. a Two-terminal conductance versus center top-gate voltage for different propagating lengths at B = 6.45 T. The upper region is set to (1,1), and the center region is tuned in the ranges of gate voltage highlighted by red and blue areas,tuned to (1,0) and (4/3,0), respectively. In the blue area, a v = 1 and a v = 1/3 counterpropagating chiral modes coexist at the interface, and the conductance decreases from G2T = 4e2/3 h to 2e2/3 h as the channel length increases from 6 µm to 150 µm. In red area, the conductance is e2/h and is length independent due to a single a v = 1 chiral mode at the interface. b Two-terminal conductance versus propagating length at different magnetic fields, with the center region is tuned to (4/3,0). c Two-terminal conductance of a 15 -μm long channel as a function of center gate voltage in a range in magnetic field 5.8 T < B< 6.6 T. The colored areas are as in panel c. d The dependence of the two-terminal conductance on the magnetic field for propagating length L = 38 µm and 15 µm. With decreasing the magnetic field, the two-terminal conductance evolves from G2T = 4e2/3 h to 2e2/3 h

Tuning the intermode coupling along the yellow dashed lines in Fig. 2c strongly affected the equilibration length. In Fig. 3b, the length dependence of G2T for several magnetic fields is plotted. While at B = 6.45 T equilibration sets in around a propagation length of 40 μm, at B = 5.8T it sets in around 6 μm. Figure 3c shows the conductance for a fixed propagation length of 15 μm as a function of the center gate voltage, moving from (1,0) (red region) to (4/3,0) (blue region) for various magnetic fields. In the red region, the conductance is quantized at e2/h, as in Fig. 3a; however, in the blue region, the strong magnetic field dependence is observed. In the high-field region, the conductance approached G2T = 4e2/3h, while at lower field the conductance got close to G2T = 2e2/3h. The observed tilted colored regions illustrate the required gate voltage changes as the magnetic field in order to keep the filling factor constant. Similar behavior, but as a function of field, is illustrated in Fig. 3d.

These results are consistent with the theoretical prediction13,14 of a generic (i.e., for any interaction, tunneling, and temperature) crossover in the conductance from 4e2/3h to 2e2/3h with increasing length; the approach to 2e2/3h takes place with exponential accuracy. Further work is needed to accurately study the temperature dependence of the equilibration length, allowing further comparison with theoretical predictions13. We also note that the temperature profile along the edge may exhibit interesting structure14. These results indicate that the magnetic field may serve as a powerful tool for controlling the intermode equilibration length. We attribute the strong effect of the magnetic field on the equilibration to two main mechanisms: (i) experimentally, it is observed that as both the gate voltage (in the upper region) and the magnetic field lower, a gap emerges (near Bc), indicating a stronger equilibration between v = 1 mode in SB2 and v = 1/3 mode in SB1. Also note that lowering the field increases the magnetic length, thus increasing the overlapping of the wavefunctions; (ii) As the crossing of the two energy dispersions (of the two edge modes) approaches the Fermi energy, the overlapping of the modes in the lateral direction increases (additional bias-dependent conductance measurements are provided in Supplementary Note 3, magnetic field-dependent coupling in the lateral direction in Supplementary Note 5).

Neutral mode

According to the theory, the equilibrated quantum Hall state of v = 2/3 consists of a downstream charge mode accompanied by a diffusive neutral mode13,21. The diffusive propagation of heat at v = 2/3 was supported by a recent experiment22. Does this neutral mode appear in our synthetic realization of the v = 2/3 state? The experimental setup needed to detect the neutral mode by noise measurement is sketched in Fig. 4a. One hot spot located at the back of the source contact, where the voltage drops from V to 0, releases energy that (some of it) propagates upstream via the so-called neutral mode. The injected source current propagated toward the ground, while the voltage noise was measured 38 µm away from the source in A1 and in A2—being indicative of the presence of a heat-carrying neutral mode. Measurements were performed in the equilibrated regime; namely, with G2T = 2e2/3 h and thus charge propagating only downstream (toward A2).

Fig. 4
figure4

Noise measurement setup and experimental results. a Schematic diagram of noise measurement circuit. Current is injected from source S and the upstream (downstream) noise is measured by a spectrum analyzer through amplifier contact A1 (A2). The contact is connected to an LC circuit at a center frequency f0 = 1.3 MHz, with the signal amplified by a homemade (cooled) voltage pre-amplifier followed by a commercial, room temperature, voltage amplifier (NF-220F5). Note the gain of cold amplifier is taken as 7.5, but the precise gain value was not precisely calibrated. b Upstream excess noise in contact A1 as a function of Is at different magnetic fields. Green line represents the Is-independent (negligible) downstream excess noise at B = 6.1 T

The noise was measured at contact A1 for different magnetic field strengths (see Fig. 4b). The noise increased monotonically with the injected DC current, and tended to saturate at higher current values. As the magnetic field increased (away from Bc), the inter-mode interaction got weaker (see Fig. 3), and the measured excess noise increased (see Fig. 4b). The observed noise is a manifestation of the upstream diffusive neutral mode being excited by the hot spot at the back of the source contact (see Fig. 4a). With the magnetic field increasing, the equilibration length, needed to fully excite the neutral mode, increases too, thus facilitating a shorter distance for the heat to reach the amplifier at A1. The more heat arrives the vicinity of A1, the stronger is the intrinsic noise due to the stochastic nature of the backscattering between the edge modes, resulting in a stronger noise signal measured at A123. No sizeable excess noise was detected at A2, which is attributed to the much larger distance between the hot spot at contact G (on the right) and A2 (being 108 μm). As expected, measurements performed when the interface was between (1,1) and (1,0) did not find any upstream excess noise in A1 (Supplementary Note 4).

We successfully fabricated an interface between two counterpropagating chiral modes of filling v = 1 and v = 1/3, and controlled their interaction by varying the magnetic field and the electron density. We observed a transition between a two-terminal conductance of G2T = 4e2/3 h, when intermode interaction was suppressed, and G2T = 2e2/3 h, when the interaction was strong. We also observed the emergence of an upstream diffusive neutral mode when the conductance approached G2T = 2e2/3 h, as always observed in the emergent (equilibrated) v = 2/3 state. These man-made synthetized modes provide a method to study a variety of non-equilibrated FQHE states as well as the transition between their non-equilibrated and equilibrated states.

Methods

Sample fabrication

An etch-defined Hall-bar with Ni/Ge/Au ohmic contacts was fabricated using E-beam lithography. This was followed by an atomic layer deposition of HfO2 followed by an E-gun evaporation of 5/20 nm Ti/Au top gates. The top gates, each defined a part of the 2D plane, were separated by a gap of 80 nm. Finally, the HfO2 is etched in small regions for the ohmic contacts, which were connected to the bonding pads by 5/120 nm Ti/Au leads.

Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The source data for the plots within the article and Supplementary have been deposited in the Harvard Dataverse repository at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SKLH8Y.

References

  1. 1.

    Tsui, D. C., Stormer, H. L. & Gossard, A. C. Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559–1562 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wen, X. G. Chiral Luttinger liquid and the edge excitations in the fractional quantum Hall states. Phys. Rev. B 41, 12838–12844 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Beenakker, C. W. J. Edge channels for the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 216–219 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    MacDonald, A. H. Edge states in fractional quantum Hall effect regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 220–223 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Johnson, M. D. & MacDonald, A. H. Composite edges in v=2/3 fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2060–2063 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Meir, Y. Composite edge states in the ν=2/3 fractional quantum Hall regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2624–2627 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang, J., Meir, Y. & Gefen, Y. Edge reconstruction in the ν=2/3 fractional quantum Hall state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 246803 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Grivnin, A. et al. Nonequilibrated counterpropagating edge modes in the fractional quantum Hall regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 266803 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sabo, R. et al. Edge reconstruction in fractional quantum Hall states. Nat. Phys. 13, 491–496 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Rosenblatt, A. et al. Transmission of heat modes across a potential barrier. Nat. Commun. 8, 2251 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kane, C. L., Fisher, M. P. A. & Polchinski, J. Randomness at the edge: theory of quantum Hall transport at filling v=2/3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 4129–4132 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kane, C. L. & Fisher, M. P. A. Impurity scattering and transport of fractional quantum Hall edge states. Phys. Rev. B 51, 13449–13466 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Protopopov, I. V., Gefen, Y. & Mirlin, A. D. Transport in a disordered ν=2∕3 fractional quantum Hall junction. Ann. Phys. (N. Y). 385, 287–327 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nosiglia, C., Park, J., Rosenow, B. & Gefen, Y. Incoherent transport on the v = 2/3 quantum Hall edge. Phys. Rev. B 98, 115408 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bid, A. et al. Observation of neutral modes in the fractional quantum Hall regime. Nature 466, 585–590 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Inoue, H. et al. Proliferation of neutral modes in fractional quantum Hall states. Nat. Commun. 5, 4067 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gross, Y. et al. Upstream neutral modes in the fractional quantum Hall effect regime: heat waves or coherent dipoles? Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 226801 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gurman, I., Sabo, R., Heiblum, M., Umansky, V. & Mahalu, D. Extracting net current from an upstream neutral mode in the fractional quantum Hall regime. Nat. Commun. 3, 1289 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Venkatachalam, V., Hart, S., Pfeiffer, L., West, K. & Yacoby, A. Local thermometry of neutral modes on the quantum Hall edge. Nat. Phys. 8, 676–681 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ronen, Y., Cohen, Y., Banitt, D., Heiblum, M. & Umansky, V. Robust integer and fractional helical modes in the quantum Hall effect. Nat. Phys. 14, 411–416 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kane, C. L. & Fisher, M. P. A. Quantized thermal transport in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 55, 15832–15837 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Banerjee, M. et al. Observed quantization of anyonic heat flow. Nature 545, 75–79 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Park, J., Mirlin, A. D., Rosenow, B., & Gefen, Y. Noise on complex quantum Hall edges: Chiral anomaly and heat diffusion. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.06871 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Erez Berg, Yuval Oreg, Ady Stern, Dmitri Feldman, and Kyrylo Snizhko for fruitful discussions. We thank Diana Mahalu for her help in the E-beam processing, and Vitaly Hanin for his help in the ALD process. M.H. acknowledges the partial support of the Israeli Science Foundation (ISF)—no. 450/16, the Minerva foundation—712598, and the European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC, No. 339070. Y.G acknowledges support by DFG grant No. MI 658/10-1, DFG grant No. RO 2247/81, CRC 183 of the DFG, ISF Grant No. 1349/14, Leverhulme Trust VP-2015-0005 and Italia–Israel project QUANTRA. J.P. acknowledges the Koshland Foundation support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.C., Y.R., and W.Y. contributed equally to this work in a heterostructure design, sample design, device fabrication, measurement setup, data acquisition, data analysis and interpretation, and writing of the paper. D.B. contributed to this work in a heterostructure design and sample design. M.H. contributed in a heterostructure design, sample design, data interpretation, and writing of the paper. J.P., A.D.M., and Y.G. contributed in the data interpretation and writing of the paper. V.U. contributed in a heterostructure design and molecular beam epitaxy growth.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moty Heiblum.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, Y., Ronen, Y., Yang, W. et al. Synthesizing a ν=2/3 fractional quantum Hall effect edge state from counter-propagating ν=1 and ν=1/3 states. Nat Commun 10, 1920 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09920-5

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing