Heart rate is under the precise control of the autonomic nervous system. However, the wiring of peripheral neural circuits that regulate heart rate is poorly understood. Here, we develop a clearing-imaging-analysis pipeline to visualize innervation of intact hearts in 3D and employed a multi-technique approach to map parasympathetic and sympathetic neural circuits that control heart rate in mice. We identify cholinergic neurons and noradrenergic neurons in an intrinsic cardiac ganglion and the stellate ganglia, respectively, that project to the sinoatrial node. We also report that the heart rate response to optogenetic versus electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve displays different temporal characteristics and that vagal afferents enhance parasympathetic and reduce sympathetic tone to the heart via central mechanisms. Our findings provide new insights into neural regulation of heart rate, and our methodology to study cardiac circuits can be readily used to interrogate neural control of other visceral organs.
Situation-dependent changes in heart rate are essential for survival and are under the precise control of the autonomic nervous system (ANS)1. Heart rate reduction during sleep2 and elevation during exercise3 result from changes in parasympathetic and sympathetic tone. In fact, heart rate variability has been utilized extensively as an index of ANS function4,5,6. Although it is well known that the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems innervate the sinoatrial (SA) node7,8 and regulate heart rate9,10,11,12,13, the wiring of these neural circuits in the periphery is not well characterized. Anatomical and functional maps of these fundamental cardiac circuits are needed to understand physiology, characterize remodeling in disease (e.g., sick sinus syndrome14), and develop novel therapeutics. However, these efforts have been hindered by a shortage of tools that target the peripheral nervous system (PNS) with specificity and precision.
Cardiac circuit anatomy has traditionally been studied using thin sections15 and whole-mount preparations16. However, these methods do not preserve the structure of intact circuits and only provide 2D information. In contrast, tissue clearing methods render tissues optically transparent while preserving their molecular and cellular architecture and can be combined with a variety of labeling strategies to enable 3D visualization of intact circuits17,18. To trace cardiac circuits, dyes and proteins have historically been used. However, achieving cell type-specificity and/or sparse labeling needed for singe-cell tracing and delineating circuit connectivity is difficult or not possible with these methods19. Additionally, many peripheral neuronal populations such as intrinsic cardiac ganglia are challenging to access surgically for tracer delivery. Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) can address these limitations since they can be used to express genes of interest (e.g., fluorescent proteins) in defined cell populations in wild-type and transgenic animals20,21,22. In addition, intersectional strategies can be used to titrate gene expression to achieve sparse labeling21. AAVs can also be delivered systemically to target difficult-to-reach populations20,21,22.
Functional mapping of cardiac circuits has relied on electrical or pharmacological manipulation of the ANS with simultaneous physiological measurements23,24. However, each of these methods has disadvantages. Electrical techniques lack spatial precision and specificity. Autonomic nerves such as the vagus contain motor and sensory fibers25, and electrical stimulation typically activates both fiber types26,27 as well as surrounding tissues28. Pharmacological techniques exhibit improved selectivity but lack temporal resolution. In contrast, optogenetics, which uses light-sensitive ion channels (e.g., channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), halorhodopsin), enables precise spatiotemporal control of defined cell populations.
Here, we develop a clearing-imaging-analysis pipeline to visualize innervation of whole hearts in 3D and employ a multi-technique approach, which includes AAV-based sparse labeling and tracing, retrograde neuronal tracing with cholera toxin subunit B (CTB), and optogenetics with simultaneous physiological measurements, to map peripheral parasympathetic and sympathetic neural circuits that regulate heart rate in mice.
Tissue clearing and computational pipeline to assess cardiac innervation
To characterize global innervation of the mouse heart in 3D, we developed a clearing-imaging-analysis pipeline (Fig. 1a). We stained whole hearts with an antibody against the pan-neuronal marker protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5) and rendered them optically transparent using an immunolabeling-enabled three-Dimensional Imaging of Solvent-Cleared Organs (iDISCO) protocol (Fig. 1b)29. We used confocal microscopy to image large tissue volumes (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Movie 1) and both confocal and lightsheet microscopy to image entire hearts (Supplementary Movie 2)30,31. We observed cardiac ganglia surrounding the pulmonary veins and a dense network of nerve fibers coursing through the atrial and ventricular myocardium (Fig. 1c). In contrast to whole-mount stained hearts, innervation was seen throughout the entire thickness of the myocardium in iDISCO-cleared hearts, with large-diameter nerve fiber bundles located near the epicardium and smaller fiber bundles in the mid-myocardium and endocardium (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 1, and Supplementary Movie 3). To analyze these data, we created a semiautomated computational pipeline to detect nerve fibers over large tiled volumes and to measure microanatomical features of fibers such as diameter and orientation (Fig. 1d and e). Large-diameter nerve fiber bundles typically entered near the base of the dorsal heart. These bundles coursed perpendicular to the atrioventricular (AV) groove and branched into smaller fiber bundles as they progressed towards the apex. These data from healthy hearts will be important for future characterization of neural remodeling in cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial infarction (MI) in which innervation patterns are disrupted and nerve sprouting occurs32,33.
While the iDISCO protocol was specifically developed for immunostaining applications, other clearing techniques such as the PAssive Clarity Technique (PACT) are better suited for visualizing endogenous fluorescence in large tissue volumes or whole organs30,34. We demonstrate that PACT preserves the fluorescence of virally labeled cholinergic and endogenously labeled noradrenergic neurons and nerve fibers in the heart (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Movies 4–6). Therefore, the application should dictate the choice of clearing technique.
AAV-based labeling and tracing of cholinergic neurons on the heart
After visualizing global cardiac innervation, we assessed whether we could identify a subset of cholinergic neurons that form an anatomical circuit with the SA node to potentially regulate heart rate. We used an AAV-based system to trace fibers, presumably from cholinergic neurons in intrinsic cardiac ganglia. Multicolor labeling strategies allow individual cells to be distinguished from one another (Fig. 2a) and sparse labeling reduces the fraction of labeled cells to allow individual fibers to be visualized (Fig. 2b)21. To demonstrate this, we systemically co-administered Cre-dependent vectors expressing fluorescent proteins (XFPs) from the tetracycline-responsive element (TRE)-containing promoter at a high dose and the tetracycline transactivator (tTA) from the human synapsin I promoter (hSyn1) at a lower dose in ChAT-IRES-Cre transgenic mice (Fig. 2b)21. Compared to dense multicolor labeling (Fig. 2a), sparse multicolor labeling resulted in a labeling density in intrinsic cardiac ganglia that was lower and that would more easily allow for tracing (Fig. 2b)21. To trace cholinergic fiber, we utilized sparse single-color labeling with tdTomato. Three weeks after viral delivery, hearts were collected and stained with an antibody for hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated potassium channel 4 (HCN4). HCN4 staining along with anatomical landmarks were used to identify the SA node, the AV node, and the conduction system35,36. We observed cholinergic fibers, presumably from cardiac ganglia, coursing along the SA node, AV node, and ventricles (Fig. 2c), identifying cholinergic neurons that are potentially involved in chronotropic, dromotropic, and ventricular control, respectively.
Optogenetic stimulation of cholinergic neurons in the inferior pulmonary vein-ganglionated plexus
Next, to functionally assess whether cholinergic neurons in the inferior pulmonary vein-ganglionated plexus (IPV-GP) regulate heart rate and AV conduction, we used an optogenetic approach. We expressed ChR2 in cholinergic neurons by crossing transgenic ChAT-IRES-Cre mice with reporter mice containing a Cre-dependent ChR2-enhanced yellow fluorescent protein allele (ChR2-eYFP; offspring from this cross are subsequently referred to as ChAT-ChR2-eYFP mice). ChR2-eYFP expression in intrinsic cardiac neurons was confirmed by staining hearts for GFP (to amplify ChR2-eYFP detection) and PGP9.5 (Fig. 3a). All GFP+ neurons were PGP9.5+ (100.0 ± 0.0%) and the majority of PGP9.5+ neurons were GFP+ (96.4 ± 1.2%) (Fig. 3b). GFP staining was also present in PGP9.5+ nerve fibers in the atria and ventricles (Fig. 3a). These data are consistent with previous studies reporting that the majority of intrinsic cardiac neurons are cholinergic37 and that the ventricles as well as atria receive cholinergic innervation37,38,39.
After verifying ChR2 expression, we next assessed whether selective stimulation of cholinergic neurons in the IPV-GP modulated heart rate and AV nodal conduction using optogenetics in ex vivo Langendorff-perfused hearts. A blue laser-coupled optical fiber was positioned for focal illumination of the IPV-GP while cardiac electrical activity was simultaneously recorded (Fig. 3c, d). Optogenetic stimulation resulted in a decrease in heart rate that was dependent on light pulse power, frequency, and pulse width (Fig. 3e–g and Supplementary Table 1) but did not change the AV interval (35.7 ± 1.2 ms before stimulation versus 35.9 ± 1.0 ms during stimulation) (Fig. 3h). The lack of change in AV nodal conduction suggests that fibers from this ganglion may pass through the AV node without synapsing. In addition, stimulation prolonged the P wave duration (9.3 ± 1.0 ms before stimulation versus 12.3 ± 2.4 ms during stimulation) and caused P wave fractionation (Fig. 3i, j). P wave fractionation has been reported in humans following administration of adenosine40, which mimics the effects of acetylcholine released from cholinergic nerve terminals41,42. During stimulations at higher frequencies, we occasionally observed ectopic atrial rhythms (n = 3/6 mice) and even asystole (n = 1/6 mice) (Fig. 3d), demonstrating the profound effect of the IPV-GP on the SA node and atrial function. The response to stimulation was abolished by administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine (−33.5 ± 11.0% with stimulation before atropine versus −0.3 ± 0.2% with stimulation after atropine) (Fig. 3k and Supplementary Table 1), indicating that the bradycardic response was indeed mediated by selective stimulation of cholinergic neurons.
Since ChR2 is expressed in both preganglionic cholinergic inputs to and postganglionic cholinergic neurons in the IPV-GP in ChAT-ChR2-eYFP mice, we assessed whether we could stimulate only postganglionic cholinergic neurons in the IPV-GP using optogenetics and still modulate heart rate. We first evaluated whether we could preferentially deliver transgenes to peripheral cholinergic neurons in intrinsic cardiac ganglia rather than central cholinergic neurons in the medulla using systemic AAVs. We used AAV-PHP.S, a capsid variant that more efficiently transduces the PNS and many visceral organs including the heart, as compared to AAV921. We packaged a Cre-dependent genome that expresses eYFP from the ubiquitous CAG promoter into AAV-PHP.S and systemically administered the virus to ChAT-IRES-Cre transgenic mice. Three weeks later, we evaluated eYFP expression in the medulla, vagus nerve, and cardiac ganglia with GFP staining. Central cholinergic neurons in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve (DMV) (1.5 ± 0.9% expressed GFP) and fibers in the vagus nerve were weakly transduced (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c). In contrast, we observed robust transduction of peripheral cholinergic neurons in cardiac ganglia (91.0 ± 1.5%) (Supplementary Fig. 3d and e), likely due to the strong tropism AAV-PHP.S displays for the PNS over the CNS. Further, GFP expression was highly specific for ChAT+ neurons in cardiac ganglia (100.0 ± 0.0%) (Supplementary Fig. 3e). For functional studies, we packaged a Cre-dependent genome that expresses ChR2-eYFP from the ubiquitous CAG promoter in AAV-PHP.S, systemically administered the virus to ChAT-IRES-Cre transgenic mice, and evaluated expression 5 weeks later. In Langendorff-perfused hearts, we were able to optogenetically stimulate postganglionic cholinergic neurons in the IPV-GP and decrease heart rate (Supplementary Fig. 4). Taken together, our anatomical and functional data establish an IPV-GP-SA node circuit involved in heart rate regulation (Fig. 3l). Furthermore, the engineered AAV, AAV-PHP.S21, can be a powerful tool to dissect out the roles of peripheral versus central circuits on organ control.
Optogenetic versus electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve
Electrical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been used in numerous preclinical and clinical studies for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases43 and other conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis44). However, the relative contributions of vagal efferent and afferent fibers on cardiac function are not well understood because conventional techniques do not allow for fiber type-specific stimulation. To address this limitation, we examined whether we could selectively stimulate efferent fibers in the vagus nerve using optogenetics. We also assessed whether there was a difference between optogenetic and electrical VNS on heart rate (Fig. 4a), as a previous study showed that electrical stimulation of motor nerves results in a non-orderly, non-physiological recruitment of fibers, with larger fibers activated first45. The vagus and other autonomic nerves contain both motor and sensory fibers that vary in diameter and myelination28 and non-electrical techniques such as optogenetics are needed to study their physiological role.
To confirm that ChR2-eYFP expression was limited to vagal efferents in ChAT-ChR2-eYFP mice, we stained for GFP and PGP9.5 in the nodose/jugular ganglion complex, which contains the cell bodies of vagal sensory neurons, and the cervical vagus nerve (Fig. 4b). eYFP was not detected in PGP9.5+ cell bodies in the nodose/jugular ganglion complex and was only present in a subset of PGP9.5+ vagal fibers (n = 5 mice). After verifying expression, we next performed functional studies in anesthetized mice in which we positioned a laser-coupled optical fiber for focal illumination above and a hook electrode underneath the right vagus nerve. In this context, optogenetic VNS activates only efferent fibers (GFP+), whereas electrical VNS presumably activates subsets of efferent and afferent fibers (PGP9.5+) in the vagus nerve (Fig. 4b). With both vagi intact, optogenetic and electrical right VNS resulted in a similar decrease in heart rate (Fig. 4c and d); however, the slopes of the responses were dramatically different (n = 6/8 mice) (Fig. 4c), likely due to differential fiber recruitment45. The heart rate response to optogenetic versus electrical stimulation of the caudal end of the right vagus nerve was also similar following either right or bilateral vagotomy (Fig. 4e, f and Supplementary Table 2). In contrast, optogenetic stimulation of the cranial end of the right vagus nerve following either right or bilateral vagotomy did not affect heart rate, whereas electrical stimulation surprisingly resulted in a decrease in heart rate at 10 Hz (−6.5 ± 1.8% versus −0.1 ± 0.1% following right vagotomy for electrical versus optogenetic stimulation) and 20 Hz (−9.9 ± 1.8% versus −0.1 ± 0.1% following right vagotomy and −3.2 ± 0.4% versus −0.2 ± 0.1% following bilateral vagotomy for electrical versus optogenetic stimulation) (Fig. 4g, h and Supplementary Table 2). The decrease in heart rate to electrical stimulation of the cranial end of the right vagus nerve following right vagotomy was also greater than that following bilateral vagotomy at 20 Hz (t4 = 3.123, P = 0.0354, paired, two-tailed t-test) (Fig. 4g, h, red line and Supplementary Table 2), suggesting that the response following ipsilateral vagotomy was in part due to a vagal afferent-mediated increase in parasympathetic efferent outflow through the intact contralateral vagus nerve. Furthermore, the decrease in heart rate to electrical stimulation of the cranial end of the right vagus nerve following bilateral vagotomy (Fig. 4h, red line and Supplementary Table 2) indicates that vagal-afferents mediate a decrease in sympathetic efferent outflow, since both vagi were transected. In addition, there was an increased latency to peak heart rate response with electrical stimulation of the cranial end of the right vagus nerve following bilateral vagotomy compared to that of the intact right vagus nerve (8.7 ± 0.4 ms versus 3.9 ± 0.5 ms) (Fig. 4i), which further supports that vagal afferents cause withdrawal of sympathetic tone46. Taken together, our data suggest that optogenetic stimulation selectively activates vagal efferents in ChAT-ChR2-eYFP mice and that vagal afferents act centrally to (1) increase parasympathetic efferent outflow and (2) decrease sympathetic efferent outflow to the heart.
Location and optogenetic stimulation of cardiac-projecting noradrenergic neurons in the stellate ganglia
The sympathetic nervous system, along with the parasympathetic nervous system, precisely regulates heart rate in normal physiology. To anatomically and functionally dissect noradrenergic neurons that form a circuit with the SA node, we used a retrograde neuronal tracer and an optogenetic approach. Noradrenergic nerve fibers densely innervate the heart as shown by staining for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), the rate-limiting enzyme in norepinephrine synthesis (Fig. 5a). To identify the location of cardiac-projecting sympathetic neurons, we injected the retrograde neuronal tracer CTB conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 into the heart (Fig. 5b). The majority of CTB+ neurons were located in the stellate ganglia of the paravertebral chain, with fewer labeled neurons in the middle cervical and second thoracic (T2) ganglia (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Movie 7). On average, 236 ± 39 neurons were labeled in the right and 261 ± 34 neurons labeled in the left stellate ganglion (n = 5 mice). Heat maps of the right stellate ganglion (RSG) and left stellate ganglion show that cardiac-projecting sympathetic neurons are clustered in the craniomedial aspect (Fig. 5d) and suggest that these ganglia may have a viscerotopic organization.
Next, we assessed whether we could selectively stimulate noradrenergic neurons in the paravertebral chain using optogenetics and modulate heart rate (Fig. 6a). We expressed ChR2 in noradrenergic neurons by crossing transgenic TH-IRES-Cre mice with reporter mice containing a Cre-dependent ChR2-eYFP allele (offspring from this cross are subsequently referred to as TH-ChR2-eYFP mice). ChR2-eYFP expression in stellate ganglion neurons was confirmed by staining for GFP and TH (Fig. 6b). The majority of GFP+ neurons were TH+ (98.7 ± 0.4%) and all TH+ neurons were GFP+ (100.0 ± 0.0%) (Fig. 6c). After verifying expression, we performed functional studies in open-chest anesthetized mice in which we positioned a laser-coupled optical fiber for focal illumination above the craniomedial RSG or right T2 ganglion (Fig. 6a). Optogenetic stimulation of the craniomedial RSG resulted in a frequency- and pulse width-dependent increase in heart rate (Fig. 6d–f and Supplementary Table 3). Although a small number of cardiac-projecting neurons were located in the T2 ganglion (Fig. 5c), there was no heart rate response to stimulation of this ganglion and/or preganglionic sympathetic fibers coursing through this region (0.1 ± 0.1% with right T2 ganglion stimulation versus 9.5 ± 1.8% with RSG stimulation) (Fig. 6g and Supplementary Table 3). The response to craniomedial RSG stimulation was abolished by administration of the β-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol (5.6 ± 1.4% with stimulation before propranolol versus 0.1 ± 0.1% with stimulation after propranolol) (Fig. 6h and Supplementary Table 3), indicating that the tachycardic response was indeed mediated by selective stimulation of noradrenergic neurons. Taken together, our anatomical and functional data establish a craniomedial RSG-SA node circuit involved in heart rate regulation (Fig. 6i).
We developed a clearing-imaging-analysis pipeline to visualize innervation of whole hearts and employed a multi-technique approach to dissect fundamental parasympathetic and sympathetic neural circuits involved in heart rate regulation. We report several novel findings: (1) cholinergic neurons in the IPV-GP and noradrenergic neurons in the craniomedial RSG project to the SA node and modulate its function; (2) the evoked cardiac response to optogenetic versus electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve displays different temporal characteristics; and (3) vagal afferents enhance parasympathetic and reduce sympathetic efferent outflow to the heart via central mechanisms.
Despite advances in tissue clearing33,47 and imaging techniques30,31, high-resolution, 3D datasets of global cardiac innervation do not exist. We show, for the first time, innervation of entire cleared mouse hearts with cardiac ganglia located around the pulmonary veins and a dense network of nerve fibers throughout the myocardium. To analyze these data, we developed a semiautomated computational pipeline to detect nerve fibers and to measure microanatomical features such as diameter and orientation. These analytical tools and resulting measurements are needed to build a reference atlas of cardiac innervation and for quantitative descriptions of innervation in healthy versus diseased states such as MI. Following MI, innervation around the infarct scar and of remote regions of the heart is altered32,33,48, and this neural remodeling can modulate the arrhythmia substrate49. Understanding changes in innervation post-MI can provide new insights into arrhythmia mechanisms. Furthermore, our clearing-imaging-analysis pipeline can be readily applied to assess innervation of other visceral organs including endogenously and virally labeled tissues.
It is well known that the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems are critical for heart rate regulation. The SA node and conduction system are densely innervated7,8, and stimulation of the vagus nerve9, stellate ganglia10, and noradrenergic fibers11,12 modulates heart rate. However, the precise wiring of the underlying neural circuits has not been delineated. We used a novel sparse AAV labeling system21 and an optogenetic approach to anatomically and functionally characterize cholinergic neurons that regulate heart rate. Although we were unable to directly visualize synapses, we identified cholinergic fibers, presumably from cardiac ganglia, that coursed along the SA node, the AV node, and the ventricles. Selective optogenetic stimulation of cholinergic neurons in the IPV-GP modulated heart rate, consistent with a recent study that stimulated cholinergic fibers in the right atrium also using optogenetics13. Previous studies showed that electrical stimulation of pulmonary vein ganglia results in biphasic heart rate responses (initial bradycardia followed by tachycardia)23,24. However, since electrical stimulation is non-specific, it is difficult to interpret whether the biphasic response was due to activation of a mixed population of neurons contained in cardiac ganglia (i.e., parasympathetic, sympathetic, and sensory)15 and/or pass through fibers. Our findings demonstrate an IPV-GP-SA node circuit and highlight the importance of using techniques such as optogenetics, which confer cell type-specificity, to dissect cardiac neural circuity. Furthermore, electrical and optogenetic techniques (using traditional transgenic and AAV-based approaches for ChR2 delivery) stimulate both central preganglionic inputs to and postganglionic neurons in cardiac ganglia. Therefore, we used a novel engineered AAV, AAV-PHP.S21, that has a strong tropism for the PNS to preferentially deliver ChR2 to postganglionic cholinergic neurons on the heart rather than preganglionic cholinergic neurons in the medulla. Future studies of peripheral neural circuits should use AAV-PHP.S and other engineered AAVs20,22 to dissect the role of central versus peripheral neuronal populations on organ function.
To map noradrenergic neurons that regulate heart rate, we used a retrograde neuronal tracer and optogenetic approach. A previous study in canines using horseradish peroxidase showed that sympathetic postganglionic neurons that innervate the heart are primarily located in the middle cervical ganglia of the paravertebral chain50. However, we report, using CTB and confirm with optogenetic stimulation, that the stellate ganglia have a viscerotopic organization with cardiac-projecting neurons clustered in the craniomedial aspect, consistent with a study in cats51. In addition to the heart, the stellate ganglia project to many other thoracic structures, including the sweat glands in the forepaw52, the lung and trachea53, the esophagus51, and brown fat54. Characterizing stellate ganglia target innervation and cell-type specification is an area of ongoing investigation55,56 that is of interest from a developmental, physiological, and therapeutic perspective.
Current understanding of the role of vagal efferent and afferent fibers on cardiac function is largely based on studies using electrical stimulation, which is non-specific and results in non-orderly, non-physiological recruitment of fibers45. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve typically activates large-diameter myelinated A fibers, followed by medium-diameter myelinated B fibers and then small-diameter unmyelinated C fibers28. In vivo we report that optogenetic stimulation of motor fibers in the vagus nerve results in a heart rate response that has a slower onset than electrical stimulation of motor and sensory fibers, likely due to differential fiber recruitment45. Our findings suggest that non-electrical techniques such as optogenetics are needed to characterize neural control of cardiac physiology. Although there was robust expression of ChR2-eYFP as confirmed by immunohistochemistry, we cannot rule out that incomplete expression or optical capture affected our results. We also show that activation of vagal afferents decreases heart rate by enhancing parasympathetic efferent outflow and reducing sympathetic efferent outflow centrally, consistent with a prior study showing that global activation of vagal afferents in Vglut2-ChR2 mice and selective activation of Npy2r-ChR2 vagal afferents causes a profound bradycardia57. In support of our functional data, anatomical tracing studies have previously shown that cardiac vagal afferent neurons in the nodose/jugular ganglion complex project to neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarii of the medulla58. These neurons then project to the nucleus ambiguus and the DMV in the medulla to modulate parasympathetic efferent outflow58 and to the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus to modulate sympathetic efferent outflow59. Future studies aimed at identifying cardiac-specific vagal efferent and afferent fibers, similar to those performed in the lungs57 and the gastrointestinal system60, are needed to better understand vagal control of cardiac physiology and to design next-generation VNS therapies.
Overall, our data highlight the complexity of cardiac neural circuitry and demonstrate that a multi-technique approach is needed to delineate circuit wiring. Understanding the neural control of organ function in greater detail is critical as neuromodulation therapies are emerging as promising approaches to treat a wide range of diseases. Tools such as optogenetics and AAVs are already providing new scientific insights into the structure and function of peripheral neural circuits57,60. A combination of these approaches will help disentangle neural control of autonomic physiology and enable a new era of targeted neuromodulation approaches.
Animal experiments complied with all relevant ethical regulations and were approved by the UCLA and California Institute of Technology Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. ChAT-IRES-Cre (028861)61, Ai32 (024109)62, C57BL/6J (000664), and Ai14 (007914) mice63 were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. TH-IRES-Cre mice (254)64 were purchased from the European Mutant Mouse Archive. ChAT-ChR2-eYFP and TH-ChR2-eYFP mice were created by crossing Ai32 mice with ChAT-IRES-Cre or TH-IRES-Cre mice, respectively. TH-tdTomato mice were created by crossing Ai14 mice with TH-IRES-Cre mice. All animals were kept on a 12 h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. Data for all experiments were collected from male and female adult mice (>8 weeks old).
Plasmids used for AAV production include pUCmini-iCAP-PHP.S (Addgene, 103006), pAAV-CAG-DIO-mRuby2 (Addgene, 104058), pAAV-CAG-DIO-mNeonGreen21, pAAV-CAG-DIO-mTurquoise2 (Addgene, 104059), pAAV-ihSyn1-DIO-tTA (Addgene, 99121), pAAV-TRE-DIO-mRuby2 (Addgene, 99117), pAAV-TRE-DIO-mNeonGreen21, pAAV-TRE-DIO-mTurquoise2 (Addgene, 99115), pAAV-TRE-DIO-tdTomato (Addgene, 99116), and pAAV-CAG-DIO-eYFP (Addgene, 104052). pAAV-CAG-DIO-ChR2(H134R)-eYFP was generated by replacing the Ef1a promoter in pAAV-Ef1a-DIO-ChR2(H134R)-eYFP (a gift from Karl Deisseroth, Addgene, 20298) with the CAG promoter from pAAV-CAG-mNeonGreen21. pAAV-CAG-DIO-tTA was generated by replacing the ihSyn1 promoter in pAAV-ihSyn1-DIO-tTA with the CAG promoter from pAAV-CAG-mNeonGreen. pAAV-TRE-DIO-tdTomato-f has a farnesylation sequence attached by overhang PCR65. The pHelper plasmid was obtained from Agilent’s AAV helper-free kit (Agilent, 240071). CAG, Cytomegalovirus early enhancer element chicken β-actin promoter; DIO = double-floxed inverted open reading frame.
Virus production and purification
AAVs were generated by triple transient transfection of HEK293T cells (ATTC, CRL-3216) using polyethylenimine (Polysciences, 23966-2)67. Viral particles were harvested from the media at 72 h post-transfection and from the cells and media at 120 h post-transfection. Virus from the media was precipitated at 4 °C with 40% polyethylene glycol (Sigma-Aldrich, 89510)68 in 2.5 M NaCl and combined with cell pellets suspended at 37 °C in 500 mM NaCl, 40 mM Tris, 10 mM MgCl2, and 100 U ml−1 of salt-active nuclease (ArcticZymes, 70910-202). Clarified lysates were purified over iodixanol (Cosmo Bio USA, OptiPrep, AXS-1114542) step gradients (15, 25, 40, and 60%)69. Purified viruses were concentrated, washed in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS), sterile filtered, and titered using quantitative PCR70. A detailed protocol for AAV production and purification is available66.
Systemic delivery of viruses
Intravenous administration of AAV vectors was performed by retro-orbital injection with a 31-gauge needle in 6–8 week old mice66. Following injection, 1–2 drops of proparacaine (Akorn Pharmaceuticals, 17478-263-12) were applied to the cornea to provide local analgesia.
Langendorff-perfusion of heart and cardiac ganglion stimulation
Mice were given heparin (100U, i.p.) to prevent blood clotting and euthanized with sodium pentobarbital (150 mg kg−1, i.p.). Once all reflexes subsided and following a midsternal incision, hearts were rapidly excised and Langendorff-perfused at 37 °C modified Tyrode’s solution containing the following (in mM): 112 NaCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 5 KCl, 1.2 MgSO4, 1 KH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, and 50 D-glucose at pH 7.4. The solution was continuously bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. Flow rate was adjusted to maintain a perfusion pressure of 60–80 mmHg. An optical fiber (400 µm core, Doric Lens) coupled to a diode-pumped solid-state laser light source (473 nm, 400 mW, Optic Engine) was positioned for focal illumination of the IPV-GP under the guidance of a fluorescent stereomicroscope (Leica, M205 FA) fitted with a 1x Plan-Apochromat. An octapolar electrophysiology catheter (1.1F, Transonic) was inserted into the left atrium and ventricle via a small incision in the left atrium and 2 platinum electrodes were positioned in the bath to obtain intracardiac electrograms and a bath electrocardiogram, respectively. Intracardiac electrograms and electrocardiogram were amplified with a differential alternating current amplifier (A-M Systems, Model 1700 and Grass, P511, respectively) and continuously acquired (AD Instruments, PowerLab 8/35). Dose response curves were performed to evaluate the effects of altering light pulse power (at 10 Hz and 10 ms), frequency (at 10 ms and 221 mW), and pulse width (at 10 Hz and 221 mW) on heart rate and AV interval. At the end of the experiment, atropine (10 uM) was administered into the perfusate and stimulation (10 Hz, 10 ms, and 221 mW) was repeated. All stimulations were performed for 10 s with 5 min between stimulations for heart rate to return to baseline values.
In vivo vagus nerve and paravertebral ganglia stimulation
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (induction at 3–5%, maintenance at 1–3% vol/vol, inhalation), intubated, and mechanically ventilated (CWE, SAR-830). Core body temperature was measured and maintained at 37 °C. For VNS, a midline neck incision was performed and the left and right cervical vagus nerves were exposed. A laser-coupled optical fiber was positioned above and bipolar platinum hook electrodes coupled to a constant current stimulator (Grass, PSIU6 and Model S88) below the right vagus nerve for focal optical or electrical stimulation, respectively. Irradiance and current were titrated to achieve a 10% decrease in heart rate with both vagi intact at 10 Hz and 10 ms, which was defined as threshold intensity. Threshold intensity for optogenetic stimulation was 77 ± 6 mW and for electrical stimulation was 33 ± 13 µA. Frequency response curves were performed at threshold intensity and 10 ms. All stimulations were performed for 5 s with 5 min between stimulations for heart rate to return to baseline values. For paravertebral ganglia stimulation, a right lateral thoracotomy was performed at the second intercostal space and the paravertebral chain from the stellate to T2 ganglion was exposed. A laser-coupled optical fiber was positioned for focal illumination above the craniomedial RSG or right T2 ganglion. Dose response curves were performed to evaluate the effect of altering RSG stimulation frequency (at 10 ms and 126 mW) and pulse width (at 10 Hz and 126 mW) on heart rate. The effect of RSG versus right T2 ganglion stimulation (10 Hz, 10 ms, and 126 mW) on heart rate was also evaluated. At the end of the experiment, propranolol (2 mg kg−1, i.v.) was administered via a femoral vein and craniomedial RSG stimulation (10 Hz, 10 ms, and 126 mW) was repeated. All stimulations were performed for 10 s with 5 min between stimulations for heart rate to return to baseline values. For vagus nerve and paravertebral ganglia stimulation experiments, a lead II electrocardiogram was obtained by two needle electrodes inserted subcutaneously into the right forepaw and the left hindpaw.
Electrophysiology data analysis
The heart rate was averaged over 0.5 s before and during stimulation. A minimum of three beats were averaged before and during stimulation for P wave duration.
CTB heart injections
Mice were given carprofen (5 mg kg−1, s.c.) and buprenorphine (0.05 mg kg−1, s.c.) 1 h before surgery. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane (induction at 5%, maintenance at 1–3%, inhalation), intubated, and mechanically ventilated. Core body temperature was measured and maintained at 37 °C. The surgical incision site was cleaned 3 times with 10% povidone iodine and 70% ethanol in H2O (vol/vol). A left lateral thoracotomy was performed at the fourth intercostal space, the pericardium opened, and the heart was exposed. Ten microliters of CTB conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (0.1% in 0.01 M PBS (vol/vol), ThermoFischer Scientific, C22841) was subepicardially injected in the heart with a 31-gauge needle. The surgical wounds were closed with 6–0 sutures. Buprenorphine (0.05 mg kg−1, s.c.) was administered once daily for up to 2 d after surgery. Animals were sacrificed 6 d later for tissue harvest.
Mice were given heparin (100U, i.p.) to prevent blood clotting and euthanized with sodium pentobarbital (150 mg kg−1, i.p.). Once all reflexes subsided, a midsternal incision was made and animals were transcardially perfused with 50 mL ice-cold 0.01 M PBS containing 100U heparin followed by 50 mL freshly prepared, ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; EMS, RT 15714) in PBS. Tissues were postfixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C, washed, and stored in PBS with 0.01% sodium azide. Langendorff-perfused hearts were immersion fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4 °C at the end of the functional experiments
iDISCO heart clearing
Whole mouse hearts were stained and cleared using a modified iDISCO protocol29. Fixed hearts were dehydrated with a graded methanol series (20, 40, 60, and 80% methanol in H2O (vol/vol), each for 1 h at room temperature), washed twice with 100% methanol for 1 h at room temperature, and chilled at 4 °C. Hearts were then incubated in 66% dichloromethane/33% methanol overnight at room temperature with agitation, washed twice in 100% methanol for 1 h at room temperature, and chilled to 4 °C. Next, hearts were bleached with 5% H2O2 in methanol (vol/vol) overnight at 4 °C. After bleaching, hearts were rehydrated with a graded methanol series, followed by one wash with 0.01 M PBS and two washes with 0.01 M PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100, each for 1 h at room temperature. For staining, hearts were permeabilized with 0.01 M PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100, 20% DMSO, and 0.3 M glycine and blocked with 0.01 M PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100, 10% DMSO, and 5% normal donkey serum (NDS), each for 2 d at 37 °C with agitation. Hearts were incubated in primary antibody rabbit anti-PGP9.5 (Abcam, ab108986, 1:200) diluted in 0.01 M PBS with 0.2% Tween-20 and 10 mg ml−1 heparin (PTwH) for 1 week at 37 °C with agitation. Hearts were then washed several times in PTwH overnight at room temperature before secondary antibody donkey anti-sheep Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 713-165-003, 1:300) incubation in PTwH for 1 week at 37 °C with agitation. Primary and secondary antibodies were replenished half way through staining. Hearts were then washed several times in PTwH overnight at room temperature. For clearing, stained hearts were dehydrated with a graded methanol series and incubated in 66% dichloromethane/33% methanol for 3 h at room temperature with agitation. Hearts were then washed twice in 100% dichloromethane for 15 min at room temperature. Hearts were stored and imaged in benzyl ether (Millipore Sigma, 108014 ALDRICH; refractive index: 1.55).
PACT heart clearing
Whole and half mouse hearts were cleared using the PACT protocol30. Fixed hearts were incubated in 4% acrylamide (Bio-Rad, 161-0140) and 0% PFA (A4P0) (wt/vol) overnight at 4 °C with agitation. Hearts were vacuum degassed and bubbled with N2 for 10 min each and then polymerized in fresh A4P0 solution with 0.25% VA-044 thermal initiator (Wako) (wt/vol) for 3 h at 37 °C. Hearts were cleared with 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich, L3771)-PBS (wt/vol) at pH 8.5 for 5 d (whole hearts) or 52 h (half hearts) at room temperature with agitation. Hearts were then washed several times in PBS over 2 d at room temperature. Hearts were stored and imaged in a refractive imaging matching solution (RIMS) (refractive index = 1.46)30,34.
For whole-mount staining, fixed hearts and ganglia were blocked in 0.01 M PBS with 10% NDS and 0.2% Triton X-100 PBS for 6 h at room temperature with agitation. Tissues were then incubated in primary antibody diluted in 0.01 M PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 and 0.01% sodium azide for 3 nights at room temperature with agitation. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-PGP9.5 (Abcam, ab108986, 1:500), rabbit anti-HCN4 (Alomone Labs, APC-052, 1:100), chicken anti-GFP (Aves, GFP-1020, 1:1000), sheep anti-TH (Millipore Sigma, AB1542, 1:200), and goat anti-ChAT (Millipore Sigma, AB144P, 1:50). Tissues were washed several times in 0.01 M PBS overnight before incubation in secondary antibodies diluted in 0.01 M PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 and 0.01% sodium azide for 2 nights at room temperature with agitation. The following secondary antibodies were used: donkey anti-rabbit Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 711-165-152, 1:400), donkey anti-chicken 647 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 703-605-155, 1:400), donkey anti-sheep Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 713-165-003, 1:400), and donkey anti-goat Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 705-165-003, 1:400). Tissues were washed several times in 0.01 M PBS overnight before being mounted on microscope slides in RIMS.
Fixed brains were cryopreserved in a 30% sucrose PBS solution for at least 48 h at 4 °C. Brains were then embedded in OCT (Tissue-Tek), frozen on dry ice, and stored in −80 °C until sectioning. For cryosectioning, 40 µm coronal sections were cut using a cryostat microtome (Leica). Sections of the medulla containing the DMV (Allen Mouse Brain Reference Atlas) were blocked in 0.01 M PBS with 10% NDS and 0.2% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature with agitation. Sections were then incubated in primary antibody diluted in 0.01 M PBS with 10% NDS, 0.2% Triton X-100, and 0.01% sodium azide for 1 night at room temperature with agitation. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-ChAT (Millipore Sigma, AB143, 1:200) and chicken anti-GFP (Aves Labs, 1:1000). Tissues were washed several times in 0.01 M PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 before incubation with secondary antibody diluted in 0.01 M PBS with 10% NDS, 0.2% Triton X-100, and 0.01% sodium azide for 2 h at room temperature with agitation. The following secondary antibodies were used: donkey anti-rabbit Cy3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 711-165-152, 1:1000) and donkey anti-chicken 647 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 703-605-155, 1:400). Tissues were washed several times in 0.01 M PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 before being mounted on microscope slides in Fluoromount-G (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 00-4958-02).
Imaging, image processing, and imaging data analysis
Images were acquired on a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, LSM 880) fitted with the following objectives: Fluar 5×/0.25 M27 Plan-Apochromat, 10×/0.45 M27 (working distance 2.0 mm), Plan-Apochromat 25×/0.8 Imm Corr DIC M27 multi-immersion, and LD C-Apochromat 40×/1.1 W Korr. Cleared heart in Supplementary Video 3 was imaged on a custom-built lightsheet fluorescence microscope fitted with a 10×/0.6 CLARITY objective (Olympus, XLPLN10XSVMP)31.
All image processing was performed using Zeiss Zen 2.1 v11, Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, NIH ImageJ, Bitplane Imaris 8.3, and custom Matlab scripts.
Computational tracing of nerve fibers to establish global innervation patterns was performed using a customized version of the open-source software neuTube71 to perform initial batch tracing of image tiles. The resulting tracings were stitched, filtered, and visualized using custom Matlab scripts. Tracing of cholinergic neurons from a cardiac ganglion to the SA node was performed semi-automatically using neuTube.
Quantification of cell transduction in cardiac ganglia (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 3e), stellate ganglia (Fig. 6c), and medulla sections (Supplementary Fig. 3b) was performed by manual cell counting using NIH ImageJ Cell Counter.
For the stellate ganglion heat maps in Figs. 5d, 3d locations of CTB-labeled cell bodies in each stellate ganglion were marked using NIH ImageJ Cell Counter. Maximum intensity projection images were manually annotated with 2D polygonal regions of interest demarcating the extent of the stellate ganglion. Marked cell bodies outside the stellate ganglion were excluded from subsequent analysis. Landmark point locations were selected along the stellate ganglion boundary (e.g., ansa). One right and one left stellate ganglion image were selected to serve as reference shapes (white dashed outline in Fig. 5d). To align the landmarks for each sample with the selected reference sample, a non-rigid warping was estimated by fitting a 2D thin plate spline warp72 with a regularization parameter of 1e−6. The density of labeled cell bodies was estimated by binning the x,y-image coordinates of each marked cell into 50 × 50 µm bins and counting the number of cells falling in each bin in order to compute the number of cells per square µm in projection. These density maps from each individual sample were then warped using the thin plate spline warp estimated from the spatial landmark correspondences to align them all with the reference sample. Finally, the densities were averaged point-wise across samples. One could, in principle, perform warping and density estimation in 3D. However, we observed little variation in the densities labeled of cells along the optical z-axis, presumably due to the consistent orientation of samples on slides.
Microsoft Excel 16.21.1 and GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 were used for data analysis and graph generation. The animal group sizes were chosen based on preliminary data that suggested a large effect size. Two animals in which optogenetic stimulation of the IPV-GP was attempted were excluded from data analysis owing to failed Langendorff-perfusion of the heart. Sample sizes are indicated in figure legends or text. In Fig. 3b, 153 ± 27 cardiac ganglion neurons were counted per animal. In Fig. 6c, 291 ± 62 stellate ganglion neurons were counted per animal. In Supplementary Fig. 3b and e, 65 ± 17 DMV neurons and 202 ± 31 cardiac ganglion neurons were counted per animal, respectively. Data distribution was assumed to be normal, but this was not formally tested. Data are presented as mean +/− s.e.m. Comparisons for all pairs were conducted with a two-tailed Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Viral vectors and protocols are available through Addgene or Beckman Institute for CLARITY, Optogenetics, and Vector Engineering Research for technology development and broad dissemination: http://www.beckmaninstitute.caltech.edu/clover.shtml.
Nerve fiber visualization and analysis algorithms used in this study are available are available at: https://www.ics.uci.edu/~fowlkes/SPARC/volume/.
Jänig, W. The Integrative Action of the Autonomic Nervous System: Neurobiology of Homeostasis. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006).
Baust, W. & Bohnert, B. The regulation of heart rate during sleep. Exp. Brain Res 7, 169–180 (1969).
Robinson, B. F., Epstein, S. E., Beiser, G. D. & Braunwald, E. Control of heart rate by the autonomic nervous system. Studies in man on the interrelation between baroreceptor mechanisms and exercise. Circ. Res. 19, 400–411 (1966).
Akselrod, S. et al. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science 213, 220–222 (1981).
Pomeranz, B. et al. Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. Am. J. Physiol. 248, H151–H153 (1985).
Pagani, M. et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympatho-vagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ. Res. 59, 178–193 (1986).
Crick, S. J. et al. Innervation of the human cardiac conduction system. A quantitative immunohistochemical and histochemical study. Circulation 89, 1697–1708 (1994).
Crick, S. J., Sheppard, M. N., Ho, S. Y. & Anderson, R. H. Localisation and quantitation of autonomic innervation in the porcine heart I: conduction system. J. Anat. 195, 341–357 (1999).
Ardell, J. L. & Randall, W. C. Selective vagal innervation of sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes in canine heart. Am. J. Physiol. 251, H764–H773 (1986).
Levy, M. N. & Zieske, H. Autonomic control of cardiac pacemaker activity and atrioventricular transmission. J. Appl Physiol. 27, 465–470 (1969).
Prando, V. et al. Dynamics of neuroeffector coupling at cardiac sympathetic synapses. J. Physiol. 596, 2055–2075 (2018).
Wengrowski, A. M. et al. Optogenetic release of norepinephrine from cardiac sympathetic neurons alters mechanical and electrical function. Cardiovasc. Res. 105, 143–150 (2015).
Moreno, A. et al. Sudden heart rate reduction upon optogenetic release of acetylcholine from cardiac parasympathetic neurons in perfused hearts. Front. Physiol. 10, 16 (2019).
Jordan, J. L., Yamaguchi, I. & Mandel, W. J. Studies on the mechanism of sinus node dysfunction in the sick sinus syndrome. Circulation 57, 217–223 (1978).
Hoard, J. L. et al. Cholinergic neurons of mouse intrinsic cardiac ganglia contain noradrenergic enzymes, norepinephrine transporters, and the neurotrophin receptors tropomyosin-related kinase A and p75. Neuroscience 156, 129–142 (2008).
Rysevaite, K. et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of the intrinsic cardiac neural plexus in whole-mount mouse heart preparations. Heart Rhythm 8, 731–738 (2011).
Treweek, J. B. & Gradinaru, V. Extracting structural and functional features of widely distributed biological circuits with single cell resolution via tissue clearing and delivery vectors. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 40, 193–207 (2016).
Richardson, D. S. & Lichtman, J. W. Clarifying tissue clearing. Cell 162, 246–257 (2015).
Lerner, T. N., Ye, L. & Deisseroth, K. Communication in neural circuits: tools, opportunities, and challenges. Cell 164, 1136–1150 (2016).
Deverman, B. E. et al. Cre-dependent selection yields AAV variants for widespread gene transfer to the adult brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 204–209 (2016).
Chan, K. Y. et al. Engineered AAVs for efficient noninvasive gene delivery to the central and peripheral nervous systems. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1172–1179 (2017).
Bedbrook, C. N., Deverman, B. E. & Gradinaru, V. Viral strategies for targeting the central and peripheral nervous systems. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 41, 323–348 (2018).
Allen, E. et al. Electrophysiological effects of nicotinic and electrical stimulation of intrinsic cardiac ganglia in the absence of extrinsic autonomic nerves in the rabbit heart. Heart Rhythm 15, 1698–1707 (2018).
Zarzoso, M. et al. Nerves projecting from the intrinsic cardiac ganglia of the pulmonary veins modulate sinoatrial node pacemaker function. Cardiovasc. Res. 99, 566–575 (2013).
Foley, J. O. & Dubois, F. S. Quantitative studies of the vagus nerve in the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 67, 49–67 (1937).
Ardell, J. L., Rajendran, P. S., Nier, H. A., KenKnight, B. H. & Armour, J. A. Central-peripheral neural network interactions evoked by vagus nerve stimulation: functional consequences on control of cardiac function. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 309, H1740–H1752 (2015).
Yamakawa, K. et al. Vagal nerve stimulation activates vagal afferent fibers that reduce cardiac efferent parasympathetic effects. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 309, H1579–H1590 (2015).
Yoo, P. B. et al. High-resolution measurement of electrically-evoked vagus nerve activity in the anesthetized dog. J. Neural Eng. 10, 026003 (2013).
Renier, N. et al. iDISCO: a simple, rapid method to immunolabel large tissue samples for volume imaging. Cell 159, 896–910 (2014).
Treweek, J. B. et al. Whole-body tissue stabilization and selective extractions via tissue-hydrogel hybrids for high-resolution intact circuit mapping and phenotyping. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1860–1896 (2015).
Greenbaum, A. et al. Bone CLARITY: Clearing, imaging, and computational analysis of osteoprogenitors within intact bone marrow. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaah6518 (2017).
Oh, Y. S. et al. Spatial distribution of nerve sprouting after myocardial infarction in mice. Heart Rhythm 3, 728–736 (2006).
Yokoyama, T. et al. Quantification of sympathetic hyperinnervation and denervation after myocardial infarction by three-dimensional assessment of the cardiac sympathetic network in cleared transparent murine hearts. PLoS ONE 12, e0182072 (2017).
Yang, B. et al. Single-cell phenotyping within transparent intact tissue through whole-body clearing. Cell 158, 945–958 (2014).
Shi, W. et al. Distribution and prevalence of hyperpolarization-activated cation channel (HCN) mRNA expression in cardiac tissues. Circ. Res. 85, e1–e6 (1999).
Anderson, R. H., Yanni, J., Boyett, M. R., Chandler, N. J. & Dobrzynski, H. The anatomy of the cardiac conduction system. Clin. Anat. 22, 99–113 (2009).
Hoover, D. B., Ganote, C. E., Ferguson, S. M., Blakely, R. D. & Parsons, R. L. Localization of cholinergic innervation in guinea pig heart by immunohistochemistry for high-affinity choline transporters. Cardiovasc. Res. 62, 112–121 (2004).
Ulphani, J. S. et al. Quantitative analysis of parasympathetic innervation of the porcine heart. Heart Rhythm 7, 1113–1119 (2010).
Kawano, H., Okada, R. & Yano, K. Histological study on the distribution of autonomic nerves in the human heart. Heart Vessels 18, 32–39 (2003).
Lellouche, N. et al. Functional characterization of atrial electrograms in sinus rhythm delineates sites of parasympathetic innervation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50, 1324–1331 (2007).
Belardinelli, L. & Isenberg, G. Isolated atrial myocytes: adenosine and acetylcholine increase potassium conductance. Am. J. Physiol. 244, H734–H737 (1983).
Belardinelli, L., Giles, W. R. & West, A. Ionic mechanisms of adenosine actions in pacemaker cells from rabbit heart. J. Physiol. 405, 615–633 (1988).
Buckley, U., Shivkumar, K. & Ardell, J. L. Autonomic regulation therapy in heart failure. Curr. Heart Fail Rep. 12, 284–293 (2015).
Koopman, F. A. et al. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 8284–8289 (2016).
Llewellyn, M. E., Thompson, K. R., Deisseroth, K. & Delp, S. L. Orderly recruitment of motor units under optical control in vivo. Nat. Med. 16, 1161–1165 (2010).
Hill-Smith, I. & Purves, R. D. Synaptic delay in the heart: an ionophoretic study. J. Physiol. 279, 31–54 (1978).
Nehrhoff, I. et al. 3D imaging in CUBIC-cleared mouse heart tissue: going deeper. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 3716–3720 (2016).
Ajijola, O. A. et al. Focal myocardial infarction induces global remodeling of cardiac sympathetic innervation: neural remodeling in a spatial context. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 305, H1031–H1040 (2013).
Ajijola, O. A. et al. Sympathetic modulation of electrical activation in normal and infarcted myocardium: implications for arrhythmogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 312, H608–H621 (2017).
Hopkins, D. A. & Armour, J. A. Localization of sympathetic postganglionic and parasympathetic preganglionic neurons which innervate different regions of the dog heart. J. Comp. Neurol. 229, 186–198 (1984).
Nozdrachev, A. D., Jimenez, B., Morales, M. A. & Fateev, M. M. Neuronal organization and cell interactions of the cat stellate ganglion. Auton. Neurosci. 95, 43–56 (2002).
Schafer, M. K., Schutz, B., Weihe, E. & Eiden, L. E. Target-independent cholinergic differentiation in the rat sympathetic nervous system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4149–4154 (1997).
Kummer, W., Fischer, A., Kurkowski, R. & Heym, C. The sensory and sympathetic innervation of guinea-pig lung and trachea as studied by retrograde neuronal tracing and double-labelling immunohistochemistry. Neuroscience 49, 715–737 (1992).
Hull, D. & Segall, M. M. Sympathetic nervous control of brown adipose tissue and heat production in the new-born rabbit. J. Physiol. 181, 458–467 (1965).
Furlan, A. et al. Visceral motor neuron diversity delineates a cellular basis for nipple- and pilo-erection muscle control. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1331–1340 (2016).
Bayles, R. G. et al. Transcriptomic and neurochemical analysis of the stellate ganglia in mice highlights sex differences. Sci. Rep. 8, 8963 (2018).
Chang, R. B., Strochlic, D. E., Williams, E. K., Umans, B. D. & Liberles, S. D. Vagal sensory neuron subtypes that differentially control breathing. Cell 161, 622–633 (2015).
Standish, A., Enquist, L. W., Escardo, J. A. & Schwaber, J. S. Central neuronal circuit innervating the rat heart defined by transneuronal transport of pseudorabies virus. J. Neurosci. 15, 1998–2012 (1995).
Strack, A. M., Sawyer, W. B., Hughes, J. H., Platt, K. B. & Loewy, A. D. A general pattern of CNS innervation of the sympathetic outflow demonstrated by transneuronal pseudorabies viral infections. Brain Res. 491, 156–162 (1989).
Williams, E. K. et al. Sensory neurons that detect stretch and nutrients in the digestive system. Cell 166, 209–221 (2016).
Rossi, J. et al. Melanocortin-4 receptors expressed by cholinergic neurons regulate energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Cell Metab. 13, 195–204 (2011).
Madisen, L. et al. A toolbox of Cre-dependent optogenetic transgenic mice for light-induced activation and silencing. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 793–802 (2012).
Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010).
Lindeberg, J. et al. Transgenic expression of Cre recombinase from the tyrosine hydroxylase locus. Genesis 40, 67–73 (2004).
Hancock, J. F., Cadwallader, K., Paterson, H. & Marshall, C. J. A CAAX or a CAAL motif and a second signal are sufficient for plasma membrane targeting of ras proteins. EMBO J. 10, 4033–4039 (1991).
Challis, R. C. et al. Systemic AAV vectors for widespread and targeted gene delivery in rodents. Nat. Protoc. 14, 379–414 (2019).
Reed, S. E., Staley, E. M., Mayginnes, J. P., Pintel, D. J. & Tullis, G. E. Transfection of mammalian cells using linear polyethylenimine is a simple and effective means of producing recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors. J. Virol. Methods 138, 85–98 (2006).
Ayuso, E. et al. High AAV vector purity results in serotype- and tissue-independent enhancement of transduction efficiency. Gene Ther. 17, 503–510 (2010).
Zolotukhin, S. et al. Recombinant adeno-associated virus purification using novel methods improves infectious titer and yield. Gene Ther. 6, 973–985 (1999).
Gray, S. J. et al. Production of recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors and use in in vitro and in vivo administration. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci. Chapter 4, Unit 4 17 (2011).
Feng, L., Zhao, T. & Kim, J. neuTube 1.0: a New design for efficient neuron reconstruction software based on the SWC format. eNeuro 2, ENEURO.0049-14.2014 (2015).
Bookstein, F. L. Principal warps - thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. Ieee Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11, 567–585 (1989).
We thank the entire Shivkumar and Gradinaru group for discussions. This work was supported by a NIH Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions (SPARC) awards (OT2OD023848 to K.S. and V.G.; OT2OD23864 to H.M.). The K.S. laboratory is also supported by a NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) grant (R01HL084261) and a NIH SPARC award (U01EB025138-01 to K.S. and J.L.A.). The V.G. laboratory is also supported by a NIH Director’s New Innovator Award (DP2NS087949), a NIH Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers, a NIH National Institute on Aging grant (R01AG047664), a NIH BRAIN Initiative award (U01NS090577), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Biological Technologies Office, the National Science Foundation NeuroNex Technology Hub (1707316), the Curci Foundation, the Beckman Institute, and the Rosen Bioengineering Center at Caltech. V.G. is a Heritage Principal Investigator supported by the Heritage Medical Research Institute. P.S.R. was supported by a NIH NHLBI F31 Predoctoral Fellowship (F31HL127974). R.C.C. was supported by an American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship (17POST33410404). P.S.R. is a part of the UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training Program. We thank Drs. Marmar Vaseghi (UCLA), Olujimi A. Ajijola (UCLA), and Ching Zhu (UCLA) for their comments on the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Journal Peer Review Information: Nature Communications thanks Matthew Kay, and other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Rajendran, P.S., Challis, R.C., Fowlkes, C.C. et al. Identification of peripheral neural circuits that regulate heart rate using optogenetic and viral vector strategies. Nat Commun 10, 1944 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09770-1
Flexible and stretchable polymer optical fibers for chronic brain and vagus nerve optogenetic stimulations in free-behaving animals
BMC Biology (2021)
Nature Reviews Cardiology (2021)
Nature Reviews Methods Primers (2021)
Clinical Autonomic Research (2021)