Scalable preparation of alternating block copolymer particles with inverse bicontinuous mesophases


Block copolymer particles with controlled morphologies are of great significance in nanomaterials and nanotechnology. However, ordered inverse morphologies are difficult to achieve due to complex mechanism and formation conditions. Here we report scalable preparation of amphiphilic alternating block copolymer particles with inverse bicontinuous mesophases via polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA). Concentrated dispersion copolymerizations (up to 40% solid content) of styrene (St) and pentafluorostyrene (PFS) employing a short poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) (PDMA29) stabilizer block lead to the formation of well-defined, highly asymmetric PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x block copolymers with precise compositions and various morphologies, from simple spheres to ordered inverse cubosome mesophases. The particle morphology is affected by the molecular weight, solid content, and nature of the cosolvents. The cubosome structure is confirmed by electron microscopies and small angle X-ray scattering spectroscopy. This scalable PISA approach offers facile access to ordered inverse mesophases, significantly expanding the PISA morphology scope and enabling its applicability to the materials science fields.


Block copolymer (BCP) particles with controlled morphologies play a vital role in materials science and nanotechnology1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. BCP self-assembly has produced various morphologies such as spheres, cylinders, vesicles, bicontinuous, and other multigeometry structures. The particle morphology of amorphous BCPs is determined by the relative block ratio and interfacial area according to the packing parameter p = V/a0lc (V the volume of the core-forming block, a0 the interfacial area, and lc the length of the core-forming block)9. While packing parameter reflects the geometry of the particles, many parameters have been demonstrated to influence the morphology, including the solubility parameter10,11, the incompatibility between BCPs12, topology13,14,15, and others16. BCP particles have been widely produced using solution self-assembly approach that has recognized limitations of multistep processing and low concentration17,18. In contrast, polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA)19,20,21,22,23, combining simultaneous polymerization and in situ self-assembly, enables efficient and reliable access to various morphologies at high concentration (≥10% solid content). PISA has been explored to prepare a wide range of morphologies using various types of controlled/living polymerization techniques13,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46. Despite rapid progress in this emergent field, current PISA research has predominantly focused on morphologies with p ≤ 1 (e.g., sphere, cylinder, and vesicle); in contrast, inverse morphologies with p > 1 have been rarely reported47.

Traditionally, ordered inverse morphologies have been difficult to achieve due to limited understanding of morphology transition mechanism, complex assembling procedures, and varying conditions, although hexasome was observed by Eisenberg and co-workers48 more than 20 years ago. Recently, much progress has been made with cubosomes and hexasomes having been produced via solution self-assembly of a few BCPs49,50,51,52,53,54,55. For instance, Kim and colleagues56,57,58 reported the formation of inverse bicontinuous cubic structures by dendritic-linear block copolymers with a dendritic hydrophilic block. These mesoscale particles are very attractive for applications in templating, separation, and adsorption and as bioreactors due to their highly porous structure and high surface area51,56,58. In principle, the high concentration and robust nature of PISA would enable more facile generation of such inverse morphologies that require aggregation/fusion of intermediate particles and the continuous changing of the surface curvature. Unfortunately, there exits only one literature report that claimed the formation of hexasome via PISA of polystyrene-based BCPs47. The paucity of reported examples of inverse morphologies limits the versatility of PISA. Thus, it is highly desirable to capitalize on the merits of PISA to prepare inverse morphologies to further expand its scope and utility.

Herein, we report the preparation of inverse mesophases comprising amphiphilic alternating BCPs via dispersion copolymerization59. A detailed and most extended morphological transition sequence is revealed starting from simple spheres all the way to complex inverse mesophases, i.e., cubosomes.

The clearly defined cubosomes obtained via PISA are confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) studies.


Synthesis of PDMA-b-P(St-alt-PFS) alternating BCPs

As depicted in Fig. 1, reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) dispersion copolymerizations of electron-rich styrene (St) with electron-deficient pentafluorostyrene (PFS) are conducted using a solvophilic poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) (PDMA) stabilizer block to afford various BCP particles. Copolymerization of St with PFS is known to generate highly alternating copolymers60,61. Thus, this PISA approach generates PDMA-b-P(St-alt-PFS) particles comprising a solvophilic PDMA block and a solvophobic alternating P(St-alt-PFS) block. Previously, Pan and colleagues47 claimed the formation of hexasome via PISA, but the monomer conversion was substantially incomplete (≤12.5%) and an unambiguous assignment of hexasome was not demonstrated. In contrast, high conversions (typically ≥90%) are achieved in this work, and most significantly, the structure of the inverse mesophases accessed at a solid content as high as 40% is fully characterized.

Fig. 1

Preparation of PDMA-b-P(St-alt-PFS) block copolymer (BCP) particles with inverse mesophases via polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA). a Synthetic scheme of PDMA-b-P(St-alt-PFS) alternating block copolymers. b Schematic illustration of morphological evolution of PDMA-b-P(St-alt-PFS) particles with increasing degree of polymerization of the P(St-alt-PFS) block (the lattice diagrams show bicontinuous internal structures of the nano-objects investigated in this study. For clarity, the bilayers that surround the solvent channels are drawn. The green- and red-colored regions indicate two non-intersecting networks of solvent channels within the bicontinuous structures). PDMA poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide), St styrene, PFS pentafluorostyrene

Previous work on alternating copolymerization of St and PFS was conducted in homogeneous solution. In this work, the alternating tendency of St and PFS in dispersion copolymerization conducted in ethanol was confirmed by the reactivity ratios (rSt = 0.52, rPFS = 0.16, rStrPFS = 0.08) and equal consumption of these two monomers when polymerized at a 1:1 monomer feed ratio (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4).

Morphological evolution of BCP particles in ethanol

In designing experimental conditions to access inverse morphologies, we recognized that highly asymmetric BCPs and high concentrations are necessary to drive a multiple-staged morphological transition. Thus, dispersion copolymerizations of St and PFS were investigated using a short solvophilic PDMA29 (Mn = 3.1 kg mol−1, Đ = 1.10) and targeting degrees of polymerization (DPs) up to 600 for the solvophobic block at a high solid content (30%) in pure ethanol at 70 °C. The dispersion copolymerizations were analyzed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Figs. 57). 1H NMR spectroscopy analysis indicated high conversions (≥90%) were achieved in most syntheses, and pseudo first-order kinetics was obtained by monitoring the dispersion copolymerization periodically. As measured by GPC, the molecular weight of PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x BCPs increased linearly with DP, and the molecular weight distribution was narrow (Đ ≤ 1.21). All these features confirm that controlled RAFT copolymerization was present under the dispersion conditions.

The morphology of the PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x particles was studied by TEM. As shown in Fig. 2, the morphology for this series of BCP particles is extremely rich and evolves from simple spheres finally to complex inverse mesophases as the DP of the solvophobic alternating copolymer block increases. Uniform spheres with a diameter of 19 ± 2 nm (Fig. 2a) were obtained at a low DP (x = 89). Fusion of these spheres led to the formation of pure worms with a similar diameter but a polydisperse length (up to several micrometers) when x increased to 108 (Fig. 2b), consistent with the formation of a free-standing gel of the corresponding particle dispersion (Supplementary Fig. 8)31,43. Further increasing x promoted the formation of jellyfish-like intermediate morphologies (x = 123) via fusion of the worms (Fig. 2c), which further enclosed to form polydisperse vesicles with a membrane thickness of 24.6 ± 4.4 nm at x = 191 (Fig. 2d). Up to this stage, the morphological transition of PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x particles is consistent with the previously observed sphere-to-worm-to-vesicle sequence for amorphous BCPs42. As the DP of the P(St-alt-PFS) block continued to increase, some interesting morphologies with p > 1 became evident. Just like simple spheres, vesicles could also aggregate via inelastic collision, with large compound vesicles (LCVs) starting to form at x = 270 (Fig. 2e). Some ill-defined bicontinuous structures were observable due to further domain rearrangement of LCVs (Fig. 2f) and, remarkably, sponge-like bicontinuous structures fully matured when x reached 356 (Fig. 2g), although the internal structure still had a low regularity. Finally, particles (Dn ~1 µm) with an ordered internal structure of intertwined channels clearly formed at a high x value of 450, and this structure was assigned to cubosome from analysis by SAXS (vide infra). The dark channels (29 ± 7 nm) correspond to the solvophobic P(St-alt-PFS) domain, and the bright channels (32 ± 7 nm) correspond to the hollow space (or solvent for particle dispersions) surrounded by the solvophilic PDMA chains. SEM showed that some of the particles had a swirled curvature due to the alignment of some channels along the particle surface (Supplementary Fig. 9). The sphere→worm→vesicle→LCV→sponge→cubosome morphological evolution, with the successful capture of several intermediate morphologies such as jellyfish and ill-defined bicontinuous structures, represents the most extended morphological transition sequence observed in PISA and provides important insights into the morphological transition mechanism for amorphous BCPs.

Fig. 2

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs of PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x block copolymer (BCP) particles synthesized in ethanol at 30% w/v and 70 °C. a x = 89 (scale bar: 200 nm), b x = 108 (scale bar: 500 nm), c x = 123 (scale bar: 200 nm), d x = 191 (scale bar: 1 μm), e x = 270 (scale bar: 500 nm), f x = 342 (scale bar: 500 nm), g x = 356 (scale bar: 1 μm), h x = 450 (scale bar: 500 nm). PDMA poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide), St styrene, PFS pentafluorostyrene

Effect of key parameters on morphology

To understand the effect of key parameters leading to the formation of cubosome, the total solid content and molecular weight of PDMA stabilizer block were adjusted, and the resulting morphologies were studied by TEM. When the total solid content was varied from 20 to 40%, inverse bicontinuous mesophases were only observed at a solid content ≥30% (Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Fig. 10). When a longer PDMA48 was used, only spheres were obtained at similar block ratios (Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Fig. 11). These results suggest that morphological transition from spheres to cubosomes requires effective inelastic collisions of particles to promote their fusion and chain/domain rearrangement, and a relative short stabilizer block and high solid content can facilitate such a process.

Despite cubosomes can be successfully prepared via dispersion copolymerization of St and PFS in ethanol, a closer inspection of the particle shape reveals that the cubosome particles are not well dispersed. Some cubosome particles adhere to each other forming particle clusters. In order to improve the colloidal dispersity of cubosome particles, we next investigated the effect of cosolvent quality. To do this, 2% ethanol was replaced by different cosolvents including toluene, tetrahydrofuran (THF), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), and dioxane, and the dispersion copolymerizations were conducted at 30% solid content targeting DP 500 (Supplementary Table 5). As shown in Fig. 3, the internal structures of the particles produced using all cosolvents appear to have inverse bicontinuous structures, but the use of 2% toluene afforded a more ordered mesophase and a simultaneously improved colloidal dispersity as most of the particles are discrete entities rather than clusters, possibly attributable to enhanced solvation of the core-forming block. Thus, toluene was selected as an ideal cosolvent for further studies.

Fig. 3

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs of PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x block copolymer (BCP) particles synthesized at 30% w/v and 70 °C using 2% cosolvents. a Toluene, x = 465, b tetrahydrofuran (THF), x = 455, c N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), x = 405, d dioxane, x = 450 (all scale bars: 500 nm). PDMA poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide), St styrene, PFS pentafluorostyrene

Preparation of well-defined cubosomes

Next, dispersion copolymerizations were further investigated at 30% solid content using different amounts of toluene as the cosolvent over a DP range similar to that in pure ethanol. When 2% toluene/ethanol was used, well-defined PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x block copolymers with Đ ≤ 1.30 up to a target DP of 600 were again synthesized with high conversions and controlled molecular weights (Supplementary Table 6 and Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13). The whole morphological transition sequence observed in pure ethanol was essentially reproduced in 2% toluene/ethanol (Supplementary Fig. 14). Remarkably, well-dispersed particles with inverse mesophases were obtained for DPs larger than 400, and their SEM and TEM micrographs are shown in Fig. 4. From the SEM micrographs, we can see these large particles with diameters around 1 µm are characterized by rough surfaces. The samples with core-forming block DPs of 428 and 490 have swirled patterns on the surfaces, while the sample with a DP of 582 has a certain faceted surface. These characteristic swirling patterns are formed due to the alignment of the bicontinuous channels on the surface with grooves being produced between neighboring channels. When DP is further increased, the internal morphology becomes more ordered and the different internal domains assume certain orientations and thus cause the formation of a faceted surface. Unlike typical spherical polymer particles with relatively smooth surfaces, the distinct surface patterns of these large particles reflect their ordered internal structures, which were probed by high-resolution TEM. As with the cubosome particles synthesized in pure ethanol, all the three samples synthesized in 2% toluene/ethanol have ordered bicontinuous internal structures, which are enclosed within a bilayer envelope with a thickness of 26–35 nm. The former two samples show similar internal patterns with similar channel size features: dark solvophobic channel diameter of 25 nm and hollow solvophilic channel diameter of 34 nm. However, the third sample appears to have different structural domains as well as different channel diameters; the dark solvophobic channel diameter is 35 nm and hollow solvophilic channel diameter is 22 nm.

Fig. 4

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrographs of PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x block copolymer (BCP) particles synthesized in 2% toluene/ethanol at 30% w/v and 70 °C. ac x = 428 (scale bars: 200 nm, 500 nm and 200 nm), df x = 490 (scale bars: 200 nm, 1 μm and 200 nm), gi x = 582 (scale bars: 200 nm, 500 nm and 200 nm). PDMA poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide), St styrene, PFS pentafluorostyrene

The mesophases of these three samples were further studied by SAXS (Fig. 5). PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)428 shows three resolved peaks, which can be indexed to the 110, 200, and 211 planes of an Imm cubosome structure with a lattice parameter a = 30 nm. PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)490 also shows the same set of three Imm cubosome reflections (a = 27 nm), albeit at slightly larger q values, but another peak appears at a low q1 (0.092 nm−1). Although the exact structure associated with this q1 peak could not be deduced for this specific sample, it suggests that as the DP increases, a second structure, in addition to Imm, emerges but in a minor fraction. Interestingly, this structure further evolves in PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)582, and the two peaks at low q can now be clearly assigned to the 10 and 11 reflections of a p6mm hexasome (a = 73 nm), while the 110 and 200 reflections of the Imm cubosome (a = 30 nm) structure still remains. The SAXS data corroborate well with the TEM observation that the PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)582 particles have different internal domains, which have mixed Imm and p6mm symmetries. On the basis of these results, we reasoned that if the DP of the core-forming block further increases, the particle morphology might transit from the mixed phase to pure p6mm hexasome. To explore this possibility, we conducted further experiments with DPs up to 800 at 30% solid content as well as increasing solid content to 40% at a fixed DP of 600 until the dispersions became colloidally unstable. However, the mixed phase in these particles remained unchanged (Supplementary Fig. 15). Further increasing toluene content (Supplementary Tables 7 and 8 and Supplementary Figs. 16, 17, 19 and 20) was also attempted, which, however, only resulted in the formation of less defined particles having less ordered internal structures (Supplementary Fig. 18 and Supplementary Fig. 21). These results indicate cubosome is the upper limit for the pure accessible morphology of this specific formulation under the investigated experimental conditions.

Fig. 5

Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) patterns of PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x block copolymer (BCP) particles. a x = 428, b x = 490, c x = 582. PDMA poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide), St styrene, PFS pentafluorostyrene


An efficient and scalable PISA approach is demonstrated for the preparation of BCP particles with inverse mesophases, with the observation of an extended morphological transition sequence from initial spheres to final inverse mesophases as the DP of the core-forming block increases (Fig. 6). The length of the stabilizer block length and the solid content are key parameters that affect the particle morphology transition. To achieve inverse mesophases such as cubosomes, the BCP particles need to experience a sequential morphological evolution from spheres to worms to vesicles to LCVs to sponge-like particles and finally to cubosomes. A suitably short stabilizer block is necessary to achieve colloidal stability and at the same time facilitate inelastic collision between particles. High solid content can enhance the population of inelastic collision and thus promotes the formation of higher-order morphologies. On the contrary, strong steric repulsion resulted from the presence of long stabilizer blocks on the particle surface effectively reduces the population of inelastic collision, leading to the formation of kinetically trapped spheres. The continuous morphological transition during dispersion copolymerization requires high chain mobility. Both the solvent and monomer can solvate/plasticize the growing polymer chains. However, as high monomer conversion is reached, the effect of monomer solvation becomes diminished. Thus, at the late stage of morphological transition, solvation from solvent becomes dominant. The solvent or dispersant (in this work ethanol) in dispersion polymerization is so chosen that it is a poor solvent for the core-forming block. In this regard, it is necessary to add a small fraction of a cosolvent (a good solvent for the core-forming block) (e.g., toluene used in this work) that can act as a plasticizer at the final stage of the polymerization or morphological transition. It should be emphasized that the amount of cosolvent should be kept minimal in order to avoid issues such as deformation of the shape of particles and weakening the driving force for self-assembly. By strategically adjusting these parameters and targeting highly asymmetric BCPs, pure cubosomes (as judged by the single set of SAXS pattern shown in Fig. 5a) can be accessed via PISA at high solid content. Given the high concentration and the continuous chain growth and reorganization as the unique driving force, PISA may become a practical and general approach for the preparation of inverse mesophases.

Fig. 6

Schematic illustration of the polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) process of PDMA-b-P(St-alt-PFS) in toluene/ethanol with the increasing monomer conversions (for clarity, the earth yellow dots and green dots stand for the monomer styrene (St) and pentafluorostyrene (PFS), respectively. The blue lines stand for PDMA29 block and the red lines stand for P(St-alt-PFS) block. Moreover, the light red- and blue-colored regions stand for solvophobic and solvophilic regions in the particles). PDMA poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide)



N,N-Dimethylacrylamide (DMA, 99%) and 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene (PFS, 97%) were purchased from J&K Scientific. 2,2′-Azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) (AIBN, 99%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Styrene (St, AR), potassium phosphate tribasic trihydrate (K3PO4.3H2O, AR), dichloromethane (DCM, AR), ethanol (AR), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, AR), toluene (AR), tetrahydrofuran (THF, AR), 1,4-dioxane (AR), and acetone (AR) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent. Ethanethiol (98%), carbon disulfide (99%), and methyl 2-bromopropionate (98%) were purchased from Energy Chemical. AIBN was recrystallized from ethanol prior to use. All monomers were purified by passing through an alkaline aluminum oxide column to remove the inhibitor. Other reagents were used without further purification.

Synthesis of chain transfer agent

2-Ethylsulfanylthiocarbonylsulfanylpropionic acid methyl ester62 was synthesized according to the procedure below. In brief, ethanethiol (5.8 mL, 0.0805 mol) and K3PO4·3H2O (21.43 g, 0.0805 mol) were dissolved in 100 mL acetone and stirred at 0 °C for 30 min. Carbon disulfide (9.75 mL, 0.161 mol) was added dropwise slowly into the above solution. Then, the solution was heated to room temperature and stirred for 1.5 h. Methyl 2-bromopropionate (8.98 mL, 0.0805 mol) was added to the solution slowly and stirring was continued for 12 h. After the reaction, the solution was filtered and evaporated. Then, the crude product was dissolved in 50 mL DCM and washed three times with water. After being dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, pure product (10 g, yield 55%) was obtained by column chromatography. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 4.83 (q, 1 H), 3.73 (s, 3 H), 3.35 (q, 2 H), 1.59 (d, 3 H), 1.34 (t, 3 H).

Synthesis of PDMA macro-CTAs

PDMA macro-chain transfer agents (CTAs) were synthesized according to a reported procedure62. Briefly, DMA (50 g, 0.5040 mol), AIBN (47.33 mg, 0.2880 mmol), and 2-ethylsulfanylthiocarbonylsulfanylpropionic acid methyl ester (3.23 g, 0.0144 mol) were dissolved in 100 mL DMF. The solution was heated to 70 °C after it was degassed with nitrogen for 30 min in an ice/water bath. The reaction was stopped after 2 h and the monomer conversion was determined to be 85% according to 1H NMR spectroscopy analysis. The solution was dialysis against ethanol and isolated by evaporation of ethanol to give the PDMA29 macro-CTA. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 3.70 (s, 3 H, Hg), 3.34 (q, 2 H, Hb), 2.75–3.20 (m, Hh), 2.66 (br, Hc), 1.26–1.89 (br, Hd, Hf), 1.22 (t, 3 H, Ha), 1.11 (d, 3 H, He). Mn,theory = 3.1 kg mol−1, Mn,GPC = 3.1 kg mol−1, and Đ = 1.10. PDMA48 macro-CTA was prepared according to the same procedure. Mn,theory = 5.0 kg mol−1, Mn,GPC = 5.1 kg mol−1, and Đ = 1.07 (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Synthesis of PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x BCP particles

PDMA29-b-P(St-alt-PFS)x block copolymer particles were synthesized by RAFT ethanolic dispersion copolymerization of St and PFS. The molar ratio of St to PFS was kept to be 1. The total solid content was 30% w/v. A typical procedure is described as follows: PDMA29 (44.4 mg, 0.0143 mmol), St (194.0 mg, 1.86 mmol), PFS (361.1 mg, 1.86 mmol), and AIBN (58 μL, 0.0123 g mL−1 in ethanol, 4.29 μmol) were dissolved in ethanol (2 mL). The reaction solution was degassed with N2 for 15 min in an ice/water bath and then heated to 70 °C for 60 h. To obtain block copolymers for characterization, more ethanol (5 mL) was added to the reaction solution (1 mL), followed by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 10 min) to collect the copolymers, which were washed three times with ethanol to give the pure copolymers. After vacuum drying at 40 °C for 12 h, the block copolymers were used for 1H NMR, 19F NMR, and GPC analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2). In most synthesis, the cosolvent (DMF, toluene, THF, 1,4-dioxane) was used as an internal standard. Comparing the peaks of internal standard with the double bond of St from 1H NMR, the conversions of monomers were calculated. For pure ethanolic PISA, the signal of the aromatic ring (6.82–7.21 ppm or 6.31–6.79 ppm) and the signal of methylene proton of PDMA29 (0.82–1.41 ppm) were used to calculate the DP of St. Comparing the DP with feed ratio of St, the conversions of monomers were obtained. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 6.82–7.21 (br, He, Hf), 6.31–6.79 (br, Hg), 2.78–3.19 (Hh), 2.11–2.78 (br, Ha, Hc, Hi), 1.45–2.11 (Hb, Hd), 0.82–1.41 (Hj). 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = −142 (Fa), −157 (Fc), −163 (Fb).

Determination of reactivity ratios of St and PFS in ethanol

Copolymerization of St and PFS was performed using St/PFS feed molar ratios from 20:80 to 80:20. For instance, at a St/PFS = 20/80, a solution of St (90.97 mg, 0.68 mmol), PFS (529.03 g, 2.73 mmol), AIBN (89 μL of ethanolic solution, 0.019 g mL−1), and DMF (20 μL, internal standard) were dissolved in ethanol (2 mL). The total solid content was 30% w/v. The reaction solution was degassed with N2 for 15 min in an ice/water bath and then heated to 70 °C. A small aliquot was taken for conversion determination. A time of 10 min was sufficient to yield a meaningful amount of P(St-alt-PFS) copolymers, yet maintaining comonomer conversion ≤10 mol% to satisfy the Fineman-Ross method. The copolymerization solution was diluted with THF (1 mL) and then precipitated in ethanol (10 mL). After centrifugation, the precipitate was collected and dried in vacuum at 40 °C.

General characterization

1H NMR and 19F NMR spectroscopy was conducted on a Varian Mercury plus 500 MHz spectrometer and a Bruker AV 400 MHz spectrometer using CDCl3 as the solvent. Chemical shifts were obtained using solvent residue as the reference. TEM was conducted on a JEM-1400 plus Microscope (Japan) at 120 kV. High-resolution TEM was conducted on a JEOL JEM2011F Microscope (Japan) at 200 kV. TEM samples were prepared by dropping 10 μL of the ethanolic dispersions (0.05% w/v or 0.1% w/v) on carbon-coated copper grids, followed by vacuum drying at 40 °C for 24 h. GPC was performed on an Agilent 1260 Infinity module with the Waters 2410 refractive index detector. Calibration was obtained using a series of monodisperse polystyrenes (molecular weight rang 5.8 × 103–8.53 × 105 g mol−1) with THF as the mobile phase. The flow rate of THF was 1.0 mL min−1 at 35 °C. Field-emission SEM was performed on a Zeiss Ultra 55 at a working voltage of 20 kV. The dispersions were diluted to 0.05% or 0.1% w/v and dropped onto mica sheet which were then attached to steel stubs using carbon adhesive. The samples were made conductive by sputtering a thin layer of gold after drying under vacuum at 40 °C for 5 h. SAXS experiments were recorded on a France/Xenocs XeUSS2.0 with microfocus liquid metal anodes Ga alloy at 70 kV. The experiments were carried out through the radiation of X-ray with a wavelength of λ = 1.34 Å at room temperature (25 °C). To prepare the SAXS samples, 0.5 mL BCP dispersions (30% w/v) were dialysis against 2% toluene/ethanol for 12 h and dropped on glass slides and dried at room temperature for 12 h and then further dried under vacuum at 25 °C for 2 h.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Won, Y. Y., Davis, H. T. & Bates, F. S. Giant wormlike rubber micelles. Science 283, 960–963 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Discher, D. E. & Eisenberg, A. Polymer vesicles. Science 297, 967–973 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Li, Z. B., Kesselman, E., Talmon, Y., Hillmyer, M. A. & Lodge, T. P. Multicompartment micelles from ABC miktoarm stars in water. Science 306, 98–101 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pochan, D. J. et al. Toroidal triblock copolymer assemblies. Science 306, 94–97 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Cui, H., Chen, Z., Zhong, S., Wooley, K. L. & Pochan, D. J. Block copolymer assembly via kinetic control. Science 317, 647–650 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang, X. et al. Cylindrical block copolymer micelles and co-micelles of controlled length and architecture. Science 317, 644–647 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Qiu, H., Hudson, Z. M., Winnik, M. A. & Manners, I. Multidimensional hierarchical self-assembly of amphiphilic cylindrical block comicelles. Science 347, 1329–1332 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gröschel, A. H. et al. Guided hierarchical co-assembly of soft patchy nanoparticles. Nature 503, 247–251 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Blanazs, A., Armes, S. P. & Ryan, A. J. Self-assembled block copolymer aggregates: from micelles to vesicles and their biological applications. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 30, 267–277 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yu, Y. S., Zhang, L. F. & Eisenberg, A. Morphogenic effect of solvent on crew-cut aggregates of apmphiphilic diblock copolymers. Macromolecules 31, 1144–1154 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hu, Y., Chen, Y. & Du, J. Evolution of diverse higher-order membrane structures of block copolymer vesicles. Polym. Chem. (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang, B., Lv, X. & An, Z. Modular monomers with tunable solubility: synthesis of highly incompatible block copolymer nano-objects via RAFT aqueous dispersion polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 6, 224–228 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    de la Haye, J. L. et al. The effect of hydrophile topology in RAFT-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 3739–3743 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang, X. et al. Star architecture promoting morphological transitions during polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 6, 337–342 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Topology affecting block copolymer nanoassemblies: linear block copolymers versus star block copolymers under PISA conditions. Macromolecules 51, 5440–5449 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhu, A., Lv, X., Shen, L., Zhang, B. & An, Z. Polymerization-induced cooperative assembly of block copolymer and homopolymer via RAFT dispersion polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 6, 304–309 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mai, Y. & Eisenberg, A. Self-assembly of block copolymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 5969–5985 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tritschler, U., Pearce, S., Gwyther, J., Whittell, G. R. & Manners, I. 50th Anniversary perspective: functional nanoparticles from the solution self-assembly of block copolymers. Macromolecules 50, 3439–3463 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Charleux, B., Delaittre, G., Rieger, J. & D’Agosto, F. Polymerization-induced self-assembly: from soluble macromolecules to block copolymer nano-objects in one step. Macromolecules 45, 6753–6765 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Canning, S. L., Smith, G. N. & Armes, S. P. A critical appraisal of RAFT-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly. Macromolecules 49, 1985–2001 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wang, X. & An, Z. New insights into RAFT dispersion polymerization-induced self-assembly: from monomer library, morphological control, and stability to driving forces. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 40, 1800325 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rieger, J. Guidelines for the synthesis of block copolymer particles of various morphologies by RAFT dispersion polymerization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 36, 1458–1471 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yeow, J. & Boyer, C. Photoinitiated polymerization-induced self-assembly (Photo-PISA): new insights and opportunities. Adv. Sci. 4, 1700137 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Delaittre, G., Dire, C., Rieger, J., Putaux, J. L. & Charleux, B. Formation of polymer vesicles by simultaneous chain growth and self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Chem. Commun. 45, 2887–2889 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wan, W., Hong, C. & Pan, C. One-pot synthesis of nanomaterials via RAFT polymerization induced self-assembly and morphology transition. Chem. Commun. 45, 5883–5885 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Li, Y. & Armes, S. P. RAFT synthesis of sterically stabilized methacrylic nanolatexes and vesicles by aqueous dispersion polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 4042–4046 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yoon, K. Y. et al. One-pot in situ fabrication of stable nanocaterpillars directly from polyacetylene diblock copolymers synthesized by mild ring-opening metathesis polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 14291–14294 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tan, J., Sun, H., Yu, M., Sumerlin, B. S. & Zhang, L. Photo-PISA: shedding light on polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 4, 1249–1253 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gao, C. et al. In situ synthesis of block copolymer nanoassemblies via polymerization-induced self-assembly in poly(ethylene glycol). Macromolecules 49, 3789–3798 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang, G. et al. Polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) using ICAR ATRP at low catalyst concentration. Macromolecules 49, 8605–8615 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yeow, J., Sugita, O. R. & Boyer, C. Visible light-mediated polymerization-induced self-assembly in the absence of external catalyst or initiator. ACS Macro Lett. 5, 558–564 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Blackman, L. D. et al. Permeable protein-loaded polymersome cascade nanoreactors by polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 6, 1263–1267 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Boott, C. E., Gwyther, J., Harniman, R. L., Hayward, D. W. & Manners, I. Scalable and uniform 1D nanoparticles by synchronous polymerization, crystallization and self-assembly. Nat. Chem. 9, 785–792 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chen, X. et al. Direct synthesis of polymer nanotubes by aqueous dispersion polymerization of a cyclodextrin/styrene complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 16541–16545 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Khor, S. Y., Truong, N. P., Quinn, J. F., Whittaker, M. R. & Davis, T. P. Polymerization-induced self-assembly: the effect of end group and initiator concentration on morphology of nanoparticles prepared via RAFT aqueous emulsion polymerization. ACS Macro Lett. 6, 1013–1019 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wright, D. B., Touve, M. A., Adamiak, L. & Gianneschi, N. C. ROMPISA: ring-opening metathesis polymerization-induced self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 6, 925–929 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ding, Y. et al. Synthesis of low-dimensional polyion complex nanomaterials via polymerization-induced electrostatic self-assembly. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 1053–1056 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Guan, S. et al. Formation of anisotropic liquid crystalline nanoparticles via polymerization-induced hierarchical self-assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 7, 358–363 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shen, L. et al. RAFT polymerization-induced self-assembly as a strategy for versatile synthesis of semifluorinated liquid-crystalline block copolymer nanoobjects. ACS Macro Lett. 7, 287–292 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Xu, Q. et al. Emulsion-assisted polymerization-induced hierarchical self-assembly of giant sea urchin-like aggregates on a large scale. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 8043–8047 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhang, W., Hong, C. & Pan, C. Fabrication of spaced concentric vesicles and polymerizations in RAFT dispersion polymerization. Macromolecules 47, 1664–1671 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Blanazs, A., Madsen, J., Battaglia, G., Ryan, A. J. & Armes, S. P. Mechanistic insights for block copolymer morphologies: how do worms form vesicles? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 16581–16587 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sugihara, S., Blanazs, A., Armes, S. P., Ryan, A. J. & Lewis, A. L. Aqueous dispersion polymerization: a new paradigm for in situ block copolymer self-assembly in concentrated solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 15707–15713 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chambon, P., Blanazs, A., Battaglia, G. & Armes, S. P. Facile synthesis of methacrylic ABC triblock copolymer vesicles by RAFT aqueous dispersion polymerization. Macromolecules 45, 5081–5090 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cockram, A. A. et al. Effect of monomer solubility on the evolution of copolymer morphology during polymerization-induced self-assembly in aqueous solution. Macromolecules 50, 796–802 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yang, P., Ratcliffe, L. P. D. & Armes, S. P. Efficient synthesis of poly(methacrylic acid)-block-poly(styrene-alt-N-phenylmaleimide) diblock copolymer lamellae using RAFT dispersion polymerization. Macromolecules 46, 8545–8556 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Zhang, W., Hong, C. & Pan, C. Formation of hexagonally packed hollow hoops and morphology transition in RAFT ethanol dispersion polymerization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 36, 1428–1436 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang, L. F., Bartels, C., Yu, Y. S., Shen, H. W. & Eisenberg, A. Mesosized crystal-like structure of hexagonally packed hollow hoops by solution self-assembly of diblock copolymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5034–5037 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hales, K., Chen, Z., Wooley, K. L. & Pochan, D. J. Nanoparticles with tunable internal structure from triblock copolymers of PAA-b-PMA-b-PS. Nano Lett. 8, 2023–2026 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    McKenzie, B. E., Nudelman, F., Bomans, P. H. H., Holder, S. J. & Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M. Temperature-responsive nanospheres with bicontinuous internal structures from a semicrystalline amphiphilic block copolymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 10256–10259 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Yu, H., Qiu, X., Nunes, S. P. & Peinemann, K.-V. Biomimetic block copolymer particles with gated nanopores and ultrahigh protein sorption capacity. Nat. Commun. 5, 4110 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Gröschel, A. H. & Walther, A. Block copolymer micelles with inverted morphologies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 10992–10994 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    He, H. et al. Cubosomes from hierarchical self-assembly of poly(ionic liquid) block copolymers. Nat. Commun. 8, 14057 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lin, Z. et al. Tunable self-assembly of diblock copolymers into colloidal particles with triply periodic minimal surfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 7135–7140 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Lyu, X. et al. Head–tail asymmetry as the determining factor in the formation of polymer cubosomes or hexasomes in a rod–coil amphiphilic block copolymer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 10132–10136 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    La, Y. et al. Colloidal inverse bicontinuous cubic membranes of block copolymers with tunable surface functional groups. Nat. Chem. 6, 534–541 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    An, T. H. et al. Solution self-assembly of block copolymers containing a branched hydrophilic block into inverse bicontinuous cubic mesophases. ACS Nano 9, 3084–3096 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Park, C. et al. Mesoporous monoliths of inverse bicontinuous cubic phases of block copolymer bilayers. Nat. Commun. 6, 6392 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Wang, X., Shen, L. & An, Z. Dispersion polymerization in environmentally benign solvents via reversible deactivation radical polymerization. Prog. Polym. Sci. 83, 1–27 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Pugh, C., Tang, C. N., Paz-Pazos, M., Samtani, O. & Dao, A. H. Correlation of free radical copolymerization behavior and copolymer properties with the strength of π−π stacking interactions between aromatic fluorocarbons and aromatic hydrocarbons: copolymerization of styrene and fluorinated styrenes at the two extreme levels of fluorination. Macromolecules 40, 8178–8188 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Brummelhuis, Nt & Weck, M. RAFT polymerization of alternating styrene-pentafluorostyrene copolymers. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 52, 1555–1559 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Wang, X., Zhou, J., Lv, X., Zhang, B. & An, Z. Temperature-induced morphological transitions of poly(dimethylacrylamide)-poly(diacetone acrylamide) block copolymer lamellae synthesized via aqueous polymerization-induced self-assembly. Macromolecules 50, 7222–7232 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank for the financial support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51733003, 21674059).

Author information




F.L., Z.A. and P.W. designed the experiments. F.L. performed the experiments. F.L., Z.A. and P.W. analyzed the data. F.L., Z.A. and P.W. wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zesheng An or Peiyi Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Cyrille Boyer and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, F., An, Z. & Wu, P. Scalable preparation of alternating block copolymer particles with inverse bicontinuous mesophases. Nat Commun 10, 1397 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.