Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sequence variation at ANAPC1 accounts for 24% of the variability in corneal endothelial cell density


The corneal endothelium is vital for transparency and proper hydration of the cornea. Here, we conduct a genome-wide association study of corneal endothelial cell density (cells/mm2), coefficient of cell size variation (CV), percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in 6,125 Icelanders and find associations at 10 loci, including 7 novel. We assess the effects of these variants on various ocular biomechanics such as corneal hysteresis (CH), as well as eye diseases such as glaucoma and corneal dystrophies. Most notably, an intergenic variant close to ANAPC1 (rs78658973[A], frequency = 28.3%) strongly associates with decreased cell density and accounts for 24% of the population variance in cell density (β = −0.77 SD, P = 1.8 × 10−314) and associates with increased CH (β = 0.19 SD, P = 2.6 × 10−19) without affecting risk of corneal diseases and glaucoma. Our findings indicate that despite correlations between cell density and eye diseases, low cell density does not increase the risk of disease.


Corneal diseases are among the most common causes of visual loss worldwide and endothelial cell failure is the leading indication for corneal transplantation1. The corneal endothelium is the monolayer of cells at the innermost surface of the cornea. Through an ion pump function, the endothelium is responsible for balanced corneal hydration, thus maintaining transparency by preventing edema and disruption of lamellar spacing of the collagen fibrils in the corneal stroma2. Maintaining proper function of the endothelium requires a minimum number of endothelial cells, around 400–500 cells/mm2 3. The cells are generally thought to be incapable of mitosis after birth but are halted in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and their number decreases with age2. The cell division is thought to be blocked by contact inhibition, high concentration of negative growth factors in the anterior chamber and by accumulation of reactive oxygen species promoting state of stress-induced senescence3,4. The response to cell loss includes spreading and/or migration of adjacent cells which increase in size and become more variable in both cell size and shape3,5.

Non-contact auto-tracking and focusing specular microscopy provides a non-invasive analysis of the structure of the corneal endothelium6. The equipment captures an image of the endothelial cell layer and provides measures of its structure including, cell density (cells/mm2), coefficient of cell size variation (CV), percentage of hexagonally shaped cells (HEX) and central corneal thickness (CCT). CCT has been studied extensively in large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) where the measurements are obtained using different types of instruments7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Several CCT associating loci have been identified including WNT10A, COL5A1, and ZNF46911. To our knowledge, however, there are no reports of sequence variants influencing other direct measures of endothelial structure such as cell density, CV and HEX.

The measures of endothelial structure are used to diagnose corneal diseases. Several corneal diseases including Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and macular corneal dystrophy (MCD) are known to have genetic components14,15. FECD is a leading cause of corneal transplant surgery and is characterized by premature loss of endothelial cells resulting in increased variability in cell shape and size leading to corneal edema and visual loss16,17. MCD is characterized by progressive spotted corneal opacities leading to severe visual impairment, caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in the CHST6 gene (OMIM: 605294). MCD is a rare condition worldwide, but because of the founder effect18, MCD is unusually common in Iceland where it accounts for approximately one-third of corneal transplantations19.

Cell density in the corneal endothelium may be reduced in glaucoma patients20. Glaucoma is an ocular disease that affects ~3.5% of people over 40 years of age, and is a major cause of irreversible blindness worldwide21,22. Commonly, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) leads to progressive damage of the optic nerve causing visual loss and it has been postulated that elevated IOP affects the endothelium23. The relationship between different corneal measures and glaucoma have been investigated, especially the role of IOP, CCT and more recently corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF)24. CH and CRF are measures of corneal response to a rapid jet of air, where CH is a measure of the elasticity of the cornea and CRF is an overall indicator of the resistance of the cornea25. Lower CH has been associated with faster rate of glaucoma progression26,27,28.

Here we describe our search for sequence variants associating with measures of corneal structure, finding 10 sequence variants, nine common and one low-frequency (minor allele frequency (MAF) <5%), associating with CCT, cell density, CV, or HEX. Two of these variants satisfy thresholds for genome-wide significance for more than one trait. Seven of the associations are novel, two are represented by coding variants and one is located in a gene known to cause a Mendelian disorder (ADAMTS17, OMIM: 607511). We assess the effects on ocular biomechanics, including IOP and CH, and various eye diseases. We find a variant near ANAPC1 that strongly associates with cell density but not with risk of eye disease, which indicates that low cell density alone does not affect disease development directly.


Summary of the data

Endothelial images from a specular microscopy of 6125 Icelanders were used in the analysis, providing measures of cell density, CV, and HEX. The equipment also produced CCT measurements. These images were obtained as a part of a comprehensive phenotyping of a general population sample (the deCODE health study), currently including 6300 Icelanders that were between 18 and 94 years of age at the time of recruitment (44.6% men; mean age = 55.9, standard deviation (SD) = 15.1). We also measured several ocular biomechanics such as CH, CRF, Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) (Supplementary Figures 16).

The number of endothelial cells declines with age and remaining cells enlarge to compensate for the cell loss. Consequently, cell density and HEX decrease with age while CV increases (Table 1, Fig. 1a–c and Supplementary Figure 7). Women have considerably lower HEX than men (50.6% vs 48.3%, P = 8.4 × 10−43; F test), while cell density and CV are slightly higher for women (2663 vs 2639 cells/mm2, P = 1.8 × 10−3 (F test) and 30.3 vs 29.6, P = 2.6 × 10−6 (F test), respectively). To our knowledge, the gender differences of HEX, cell density and CV have not been reported before. Consistent with previous reports29, CCT does not change with age and is higher for men than women (565.4 vs 561.5 μm, P = 1.9 × 10−4; F test) (Fig. 1d). The measurements of corneal structure are correlated, also after adjusting for sex and age (Supplementary Table 1). The strongest correlations are between CV and HEX (r = −0.65) and between CV and cell density (r = −0.33).

Table 1 Summary of data
Fig. 1

Corneal structure measurements by age (N = 6125). The average a cell density, b HEX, c CV, and d CCT values for subjects belonging to a 10 year age group (e.g., age = 30 for individuals between 26 and 35) against age, for men and women. e The average cell density for subjects belonging to a 10 year age group against age for noncarriers, heterozygous, and homozygous carriers of the ANAPC1 variant, rs78658973. The gray lines show the 95% confidence intervals

Study design

To search for sequence variants associating with corneal structure, we analyzed 35.2 million sequence variants identified through whole-genome sequencing of 28,075 Icelanders that were subsequently imputed into 155,250 chip-typed individuals, as well as their first- and second-degree relatives30,31 (Supplementary Figures 811). Ten sequence variants, satisfied our genome-wide significance thresholds that are dependent on sequence variant annotation32 (Table 2, Supplementary Table 2).

Table 2 Association results

To determine whether the associating variants affect the risk of eye diseases we performed a meta-analysis of GWAS results from Iceland and the UK Biobank (Supplementary Table 3 and 4). We tested the variants for association with glaucoma (8432 cases and 641,353 controls) and the sub-categories: primary open-angle glaucoma (2296 cases and 705,937 controls), and primary angle closure glaucoma (777 cases and 637,017 controls). We also tested the variants for association with disorders of cornea (ICD10 code H18, 756 cases and 663,218 controls) and the sub-categories; corneal degeneration (ICD10 code H18.4, 199 cases and 684,021 controls), hereditary corneal dystrophies (ICD10 code H18.5, 330 cases and 683,652 controls) and keratoconus (ICD10 code H18.6, 127 cases and 659,503 controls). We applied a Bonferroni corrected P-value threshold based on testing ten corneal structure variants for association with seven phenotypes (P < 0.05/(7*10) = 7.1 × 10−4).

GWAS results

Two sequence variants associate with cell density (Fig. 2a, Table 2). The strongest association is represented by a common intergenic variant located 0.4 kb downstream of ANAPC1, rs78658973[A] (MAF = 28.3%), that associates with decreased cell density (β = −0.77 SD, P = 1.8 × 10−314; a likelihood-ratio test was performed in all genome-wide associations) (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Figure 12). rs78658973 is highly correlated with 113 variants (r2 > 0.8) in the region, none of which is protein coding. The most highly correlated coding variants are two splice region variants in ANAPC1; rs201128688 and rs142711068 (r2 = 0.72 and 0.73, respectively). The effect of rs78658973[A] conditioning on the two splice region variants is still significant (β = −0.78 SD, P = 7.8 × 10−85), while the effect of the splice region variants are completely explained by rs78658973. rs78658973[A] also associates with CV (β = 0.23 SD, P = 2.8 × 10−28) and HEX (β = −0.16 SD, P = 2.6 × 10−19), but this is largely driven by the strong effect on cell density (CV adjusted for cell density: β = −0.04 SD, P = 0.049; HEX adjusted for cell density: β = −0.04 SD, P = 0.072). Interestingly, rs78658973[A] also associates with CH (β = 0.19 SD, P = 2.6 × 10−19) (Supplementary Table 4, Fig. 3) which reflects the cornea’s ability to absorb and dissipate energy25,33. CH and cell density are only weakly correlated after adjusting for sex and age (r = −0.03) and the effect of rs78658973[A] on CH is not affected by adjustment for cell density (βadjusted = 0.21 SD, Padjusted = 1.5 × 10−18). CH is lower in patients with glaucoma or corneal disorders like keratoconus34. However, rs78658973 does not associate with corneal diseases or glaucoma in our data (P > 0.03, Supplementary Table 4).

Fig. 2

Manhattan plots. Association results for the corneal measures (N = 6125) obtained from the specular microscopy; a cell density, b HEX, c CV, and d CCT. The −log10 P-values are plotted for each variant against their chromosomal position. A likelihood-ratio test was used when testing for association

Fig. 3

Effects of the GWS corneal structure variants on different corneal measures. Each row shows the estimated effect of the minor allele on the corneal measures from the specular microscopy and the ocular response analyzer. The variants are annotated with their corresponding gene and grouped by their strongest associating trait. The effect is shown only for significant associations after adjusting for multiple testing with a false discovery rate procedure for each variant. Red color represents a positive effect on the corneal measures and blue color represents a negative effect. Non-significant associations are colored white

The other variant associating with cell density is a common allele of a microsatellite at TCF4 (MAF = 6.1%), a CTG repeat of length ≥ 33, corresponding to the expanded CTG 18.1 allele (OMIM: 602272, allelic variant 0.0007). This microsatellite is pathogenic according to Clinvar and has been reported to strongly predispose to autosomal dominant FECD35,36,37,38, a disease of the corneal endothelium that affects roughly 4% of people over 40 years old (OMIM: 602272). Consistent with the characteristics of FECD, the expanded CTG 18.1 allele associates with lower cell density and HEX (β = −0.38 SD, P = 1.6 × 10−19 and β = −0.37 SD, P = 5.9 × 10−18, respectively). Interestingly, it also associates with decreased CH, CRF and IOPg (β = −0.29 SD, P = 3.1 × 10−12, β = −0.30 SD, P = 7.9 × 10−13 and β = −0.18 SD, P = 1.7 × 10−5, respectively) while not affecting glaucoma risk (OR = 0.92, CI = (0.82;1.03), P = 0.15). Consistent with previous reports, the expanded CTG 18.1 allele associates with hereditary corneal dystrophies in our data (OR = 7.7, P = 3.3 × 10−31, Supplementary Table 4).

The GWAS on HEX revealed only the two variants at ANAPC1 and TCF4 (Table 2, Fig. 2b), both of which associate more strongly with cell density.

We identified three loci associating most strongly with CV (Fig. 2c, Table 2). At 17p12, an intergenic variant rs2323458[A] located ~ 300 kb downstream of HS3ST3B1, associates with increased CV (AF = 36.1%, β = 0.14 SD, P = 6.9 × 10−13). rs2323458 is in moderate linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs2323457 (r2 = 0.61) which has been reported to associate with CCT11. In our data, rs2323457 also associates with CV (β = 0.14 SD, P = 1.4 × 10−10) but conditional analysis revealed that the effect is driven by rs2323458 (βadjusted = 0.043 SD, Padjusted = 0.21). We did not replicate the effect of rs2323457 on CCT (β = −0.033 SD, P = 0.13), even though the power for replication is 94% at a two-sided significance level of 0.05. Two more variants associate with CV: rs10094779[G] at 8p23.1 ~ 40 kb upstream of MIR124-1 and rs76561503[C] at 11q24.1 ~ 60 kb downstream of MIR100HG (AF = 24.2%, β = 0.15 SD, P = 7.6 × 10−12 and AF = 17.9%, β = 0.16 SD, P = 3.3 × 10−10, respectively). Variants at 8p23.1, between MIR124-1 and MSRA, have been reported to associate with high myopia39. rs10094779 is only moderately correlated with the reported variants (r2 < 0.25). Interestingly, a variant in MIR100HG, rs577948, has also been reported to associate with myopia40. However, rs76561503 is not correlated with the reported variant (r2 = 0.03).

Five variants associated with CCT in our data (Fig. 2d, Table 2). Three are at established CCT loci: ZNF469, WNT10A, and COL5A18,9,41. The two novel CCT associations are with the missense variants p.Thr446Ile in ADAMTS17 (MAF = 13.8%, β = 0.18 SD, P = 1.3 × 10−10) and p.Tyr24Cys in GLT8D2 (MAF = 4.3%, β = 0.30 SD, P = 3.9 × 10−10). P.Thr446Ile in ADAMTS17 has been associated with decreased intraocular pressure42 and decreased height43. P.Thr446Ile associates with decreased intraocular pressure in our data (β = 0.14 SD, P = 5.8 × 10−7), but after adjusting for CCT the association is much weaker (βadjusted = 0.06 SD, Padjusted = 0.024). Rare sequence variants in ADAMTS17 cause autosomal recessive Weill-Marchesani syndrome, a rare connective tissue disorder with features including microspherophakia, severe myopia, glaucoma, cataract, and short stature (OMIM: 607511). Notably, p.Tyr24Cys in GLT8D2 associates with increased height in a meta-analysis of the Icelandic and UK Biobank data (β = 0.06 SD, P = 1.4 × 10−11, N = 490,381). To understand the relationship between height and CCT, we evaluated the correlation between the effect on height in the Icelandic and UK Biobank data (N = 490,381) of 693 reported adult height variants44 and their effects on CCT, but found no correlation (r2 = 0.006; P = 0.038; F test) (Supplementary Figure 13). To validate the CCT association of the two novel variants, we tested them in a non-overlapping sample of 1459 Icelanders with CCT measurements from the Reykjavik Eye Study45. At a significance threshold of P < 0.05, we replicated the associations for both p.Thr446Ile in ADAMTS17 and p.Tyr24Cys in GLT8D2 with CCT (β = 0.25 SD, P = 7.3 × 10−3 and β = 0.11 SD, P = 0.045, respectively) (Supplementary Table 5).

Gene expression

We examined the expression levels of the genes at the 10 associating loci using the publicly available Ocular Tissue Database46. For non-coding variants we looked for all genes in a 500 kb region around the associating variant. We found that 13 of the 15 genes at the 10 loci are expressed in all ocular tissues (Supplementary Data 1). MIR124-1 and MIR100HG were not found in the database, but previous studies have reported that MIR124-1 is expressed in the human lens47 and both MIR124-1 and MIR100HG are expressed in the human retina40,48. Expression levels varied across tissues for some genes, e.g., GLT8D2 is most highly expressed in the cornea, TCF4 in the sclera and ANAPC1 in the optic nerve head.

Disease variants affect corneal structure

Two different mutations in CHST6 are known to cause MCD in Iceland; a missense variant p.Ala128Val (MAF = 0.66%) and a frameshift variant p.Val6MetfsTer106 (MAF = 0.07%)15. The prevalence of MCD in Iceland is ~ 1/13,00049. We observed that 11 out of 16 homozygous carries of p.Ala128Val, and two out of three homozygous carriers of p.Val6MetfsTer106, have been diagnosed with hereditary corneal dystrophies (ICD10 code H18.5). We investigated the effect of these known disease variants on the corneal measures from the specular microscopy. P.Val6MetfsTer106 associates with cell density and HEX (β = −3.02 SD, P = 4.5 × 10−4 and β = −2.00 SD, P = 9.3 × 10−3, respectively) under the recessive model. The association is due to two homozygote carriers showing extremely low values (Supplementary Table 6.a). No homozygote carriers of p.Ala128val participated in the deCODE health study. We did not observe an effect of the two variants among heterozygous carriers (Supplementary Table 6b).

Out of the 6125 study participants, 194 (3.2%) had primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Among our corneal measures from the specular microscopy, POAG correlates most strongly with cell density (glaucoma patients have 104 cell/mm2 lower cell density than controls, P = 2.1 × 10−6; F test). It also correlates with CH, IOPcc and CCT (Table 1).

Due to the correlation between various corneal measures and glaucoma status we assessed the effects of all 15 variants reported to associate with POAG50 (Supplementary Data 2). First, we replicated the association of 11 out of the 15 variants with POAG (P < 0.05). The estimated replication power for the remaining four variants at GMD2, ZFPM2, ATXN2, and PMM2 was > 99.7% at two-sided significance level of 0.05. We investigated the effects of the 11 replicated variants on different corneal measures (Fig. 4a). Five of the 11 variants associate with IOPg, where the POAG risk increasing allele associates with increased IOPg. Even though the strongest relationship of glaucoma is with CH (CH is lower in glaucoma patients), only two of the POAG variants associate with CH. Counter-intuitively, the TMCO1 allele that increases glaucoma risk associates with lower CH but the FNDC3B allele that increases glaucoma risk associates with greater CH. The variant in FOXC1 is the only POAG variant that also affects cell density. The correlation between the variants’ effect on POAG and their effect on available corneal measures were not significant for any trait, controlling the false discovery rate at 0.05 (Supplementary Table 7).

Fig. 4

The effect of reported POAG, CCT, and IOP variants on corneal measures. Red color represents a positive effect on the corneal measures and blue color represents a negative effect. a Effect of previously reported POAG variants on corneal traits for the POAG risk increasing allele. Effects on the traits are shown for significant associations after adjusting for multiple testing with a false discovery rate procedure for each variant. b Effect of previously reported CCT variants that replicate in our data (P < 0.05) and novel CCT variants on corneal measures for the CCT increasing allele. Effects on other traits are shown for significant associations after adjusting for multiple testing with a false discovery rate procedure for each variant. c Effect of previously reported IOPg variants that replicate in our data (P < 0.05) on corneal measures for the IOPg increasing allele. Effects on other traits are shown for significant associations after adjusting for multiple testing with a false discovery rate procedure for each variant

Previously reported variants for CCT and IOP

GWASs have been published for two corneal traits, CCT and IOP. For CCT, 49 variants have been reported7,11 and we replicate 28 of them (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Data 3). The CCT effects of these variants, and the two novel CCT variants in ADAMTS17 and GLTD82, correlate with their effects on CH, CRF, and IOPg (Supplementary Table 7, Supplementary Figure 14). The effects on different corneal measures by the CCT increasing allele is shown in Fig. 4b. A recent study using participants from the UK Biobank (N = 115,486) identified 209 variants at 175 novel loci associating with IOPg51. We replicate 56 out of these 209 variants in the much smaller Icelandic data (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Data 4). The effects on different corneal measures by the IOPg increasing allele is shown in Fig. 4c. The effects of the IOP variants on IOPg correlate with their effects on CH, CRF, IOPcc, and POAG (Supplementary Table 7, Supplementary Figure 15).


Using measurements from a specular microscopy, we discovered seven novel variants associating with measurements of corneal structure, i.e., CCT, cell density, CV, and HEX. We further examined their effect on ocular biomechanics, such as CH, CRF, and IOP, as well as examining their effects on the risk of glaucoma and corneal diseases.

The most significant finding is the association of rs78658973 near ANAPC1 with cell density. ANAPC1 encodes the Anaphase Promoting Complex Subunit 1, a cell cycle-regulated E3 ubiquitin ligase that controls progression through mitosis and the G1 phase of the cell cycle52. The complex is composed of 15–17 subunits, which are highly conserved from yeast to humans. Mutations in the orthologous gene in the fruitfly, shattered (shtd), result in defective eye development53 because of disruption of the G1 cell cycle arrest and progression through mitosis. Interestingly, rs78658973 also strongly increases CH, independently of its effect on cell density. CH measures ability of the corneal tissue to dampen pressure changes; such mechanical properties of most tissues are dominated by an extracellular matrix (ECM), in which the connective tissue fibers provide mechanical strength54. Many rare connective tissue disorders are characterized by both skeletal and eye abnormalities, such as Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, dermatosparaxis type and Weill-Marchesani syndrome (OMIM: 154700, 225410, and 607511, respectively). An intron variant in ANAPC1, rs17040773[G], in complete LD with rs78658973[A] (r2 = 1.00), has been reported to associate with decreased bone mineral density55 and ANAPC1 is expressed in bone (Hs.436527). A possible mechanism explaining the association of rs78658973 with cell density in the corneal endothelium may be the role ANAPC1 has in controlling proliferation of the developing corneal endothelial cells, and likewise, proliferation of bone cells influencing bone density. However, a direct relationship between rs78658973 and ANAPC1, or any other gene at the locus, remains to be shown. The estimated fraction of variance of cell density explained by rs78658973 is 24% which is extremely high for such a complex human trait. In comparison, no other variant listed in the GWAS catalog56 explains higher fraction of variance of a quantitative phenotype available in the extensive deCODE database (Supplementary Table 8). This finding has clinical importance, since reduction in endothelial cell density along with more variable cell size and shape is usually the first sign of corneal endothelial diseases and cell density is important when assessing risk of corneal endothelial failure prior to intraocular surgery57. Corneal graft survival studies found cell density lower than 1700 cells/mm2, 6 months after graft surgery to be associated with increased risk of graft failure58. Thirty-year-old homozygote carriers of the ANAPC1 variant have on average 2637 endothelial cells per mm2, which is less than the average 70-year old noncarriers (Fig. 1e). Further studies could assess if carriers of the variant are more likely to suffer endothelial decompensation after intraocular surgery or if their cornea is associated with increased risk of corneal graft failure when used as donors.

We also found association of variants at known disease loci, TCF4 and CHST6 (FCED and MCD, respectively), with cell density and HEX, demonstrating how these structural measurements are affected by corneal diseases. The TCF4 variant also strongly associates with CH and it is interesting to note that the TCF4 and ANAPC1 variants control almost the same quantitative corneal traits (Fig. 3) but have very different associations with corneal disease. Furthermore, glaucoma risk is strongly associated with lower cell density, while for example the ANAPC1 variant that controls a quarter of the cell density variance does not associate directly with POAG or PACG. These findings suggest that the pathogenic processes that cause corneal diseases and glaucoma may also lower the cell density, but low cell density in and of itself does not increase risk of disease. In addition, we evaluated the effects of reported POAG variants on corneal structure to further explore the relationship between these traits. Even though CH, cell density, and CCT are lower in POAG patients, the effects of POAG associating variants on POAG risk do not correlate with their effects on these traits in our data. This suggests that these variants do not confer risk of POAG through their effect on these corneal metrics.

Healthy corneal endothelium is necessary for visual perception and its dysfunction is the most common reason for corneal transplantation. Our understanding of the structure and function of corneal endothelial cells and how they relate to diseases is limited. The work presented here constitutes a contribution toward shedding a light on this.


Study Subjects

Endothelial images from non-contact auto-tracking and -focusing Konan CellCheck SL specular microscopy (Konan Medical USA Inc., Irvine, CA) and measures of ocular biomechanics using the Reichert ocular response analyzerR (ORA G3, Reichert Technologies, Depew, NY, USA) were obtained for 6266 Icelanders as a part of the deCODE health study. Participation in the deCODE health study also includes an online questionnaire and verbal interviews about health and lifestyle, a number of physical measurements, blood sample collection, and permission to access health-related information from a range of registries and records, including hospital data. We defined subjects in the study to have glaucoma if they reported history of glaucoma or had a hospital discharge diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma (ICD10 code H40.1). CCT associations were replicated in a previously described dataset from the Reykjavik Eye Study59. Testing variants for association with ocular diseases, we defined the glaucoma and corneal disorder populations based on six different ICD diagnoses; glaucoma information was obtained from participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study and from Icelandic ophthalmologists as described previously60 (ICD10 H40.1, 4004 cases and 237,214 controls), primary open-angle glaucoma (ICD10 code H40.1, 1261 cases and 303,388 controls), primary angle-closure glaucoma (ICD10 code H40.2, 78 cases and 229,149 controls), disorders of cornea (ICD10 code H18, 133 cases and 255,274 controls), corneal degeneration (ICD10 code H18.4, 81 cases and 287,394 controls), and hereditary corneal dystrophies (ICD code H18.5, 119 cases and 301,665 controls). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the study was approved by the Icelandic Data Protection Authority and the National Bioethics Committee (VSNb2015120006/03.01 with amendments).

The UK Biobank study is a large prospective cohort study of ~ 500,000 individuals from across UK, aged between 40 and 69 at recruitment61. Extensive phenotypic and genotypic information has been collected for the participants, including ICD coded diagnoses from inpatient and outpatient hospital episodes. In this study, we defined the glaucoma and corneal disorder populations based on six different ICD diagnoses; glaucoma (ICD10 code H40, 4428 cases and 404,139 controls), primary open-angle glaucoma (ICD10 code H40.1, 1035 cases and 402,449 controls), primary angle-closure glaucoma (ICD10 code H40.2, 699 cases and 407,868 controls), disorders of cornea (ICD10 code H18, 623 cases and 407,868 controls), corneal degeneration (ICD10 code H18.4, 118 cases and 396,627 controls), and hereditary corneal dystrophies (ICD code H18.5, 211 cases and 378,987 controls). Diagnoses were obtained from primary or secondary diagnoses codes a participant had recorded across all their episodes in hospital. Self-reported diagnoses were excluded from our analysis and we only included individuals determined to be of white British ancestry62. We did not exclude related individuals from the analysis but use LD score regression63 to account for inflation in test statistics due to relatedness. In addition, height measurements were available for 407,825 individuals. UK Biobank’s scientific protocol and operational procedures were reviewed and approved by the North West Research Ethics Committee (REC Reference Number: 06/MRE08/65), and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Images from Konan CellCheck SL specular microscopy

The specular microscopy images were taken by specially trained nurses. One image was taken per eye. The nurse made a visual assessment of the image and selected automated analysis with auto trace for all normal images. Before automatic analysis, the size of cells (S, M, L, or XL) was determined and the cell border lines were compared with the cell borders visually.

All automated analysis were reviewed by a cornea specialist (G.M.Z.) and if found acceptable the automated analysis was used.

Images with any abnormalities, e.g., black areas, highly irregular cell size or shape, or poor quality images, were marked for manual analysis. These images were reviewed and analysed with the Center Method or in a few cases with the Flex Center Method. Images, where no cell structure was seen, were marked ungradeble. All analysis was done by a cornea specialist (G.M.Z.).

We excluded 415 low-quality images for 276 subjects prior to the analysis by regressing cell count against estimated cell density and removed images where the residuals from the fitted model where < −15. Thus, the sample size reduced from N = 6266 to N = 6125.

Whole-genome sequencing

The process used to whole-genome sequence the 28,075 Icelanders, and the subsequent imputation has been described in a recent publication30,31. In summary, we sequenced the whole genomes of 28,075 Icelanders using Illumina technology to a mean depth of at least 10 × (median 32 ×). SNPs and indels were identified and their genotypes called using joint calling with Graphtyper64. In total, 155,250 Icelanders were genotyped using Illumina SNP chips and their genotypes were phased using long-range phasing65. All sequenced individuals were also chip-typed and long-range phased, which provided information about haplotype sharing that was used to improve genotype calls. Genotypes of the 37.6 million high quality sequence variants were imputed into all chip-typed Icelanders. Using genealogic information, the sequence variants were also imputed into relatives of the chip-typed to further increase the sample size for association analysis and increased the power to detect associations. All of the variants that were tested had imputation information over 0.8.

In UK Biobank genotyping was performed using a custom-made Affimetrix chip, UK BiLEVE Axiom in the first 50,000 individuals66, and with Affimetrix UK Biobank Axiom array in the remaining participants67; 95% of the signals overlap in both chips. Imputation was performed by Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics using a combination of 1000Genomes phase 368, UK10K69 and HRC reference panels70, for up to 92,693,895 SNPs62.

Association analysis

All quantitative ocular measurements were averaged for both eyes, rank-based inverse normal transformed to a standard normal distribution separately for each sex and adjusted for age using a generalized additive model71. For each sequence variant, a linear regression model, using the genotype as an additive covariate, the transformed quantitative trait as a response and assuming the variance–covariance matrix to be proportional to the kinship matrix, was used to test for association.

We used LD score regression to account for distribution inflation in the dataset due to cryptic relatedness and population stratification63. With a set of 1.1 million variants we regressed the χ2 statistics from our GWASs against LD score and used the intercepts as a correction factors. The estimated correction factors were 1.05, 1.03, 1.03, 1.06, 1.06, 1.05, 1.05, and 1.05 for cell density, CV, HEX, CCT, CH, CRF, IOPg, and IOPcc, respectively.

We used logistic regression to test for association between sequence variants and binary traits, regressing trait status against expected genotype count. In the Icelandic data, we adjusted for sex, age or age at death, county of birth, blood sample availability and an indicator function for the overlap of the subject’s lifetime with the time span of phenotype collection, by including these variables in the logistic regression model. In the UK Biobank data, we adjusted for sex and age, as well as 40 principle components in order to adjust for population stratification.

For the meta-analysis we used a fixed-effects inverse variance method72 based on effect estimates and standard errors from deCODE and the UK Biobank study. Sequence variants from deCODE and the UK Biobank imputation were matched on position and alleles.

Significance thresholds

The thresholds for genome-wide significance were estimated from the Icelandic data and corrected for multiple testing with a weighted Bonferroni adjustment using the enrichment of variant classes as weights with predicted functional impact among association signals32. With 37.6 million sequence variants in the Icelandic data, the weights given in Sveinbjornsson et al. were rescaled to control the family-wise error rate. This resulted in significance thresholds of 2.5 × 10−7 for loss-of-function variants, 5.0 × 10−8 for moderate-impact variants, 4.5 × 10−9 for low-impact variants, 2.3 × 10−9 for other variants within DHS sites, and 7.5 × 10−10 for remaining variants. We evaluated false discovery rate, assessed with the q-value package in R. The P value cutoff of 5.0 × 10−8 corresponded to q-values of 0.0014 for cell density, 0.0035 for CV, 0.0117 for CCT, and 0.0116 for HEX, which add up to 3.4%.

When assessing, if associating variants have an effect on other corneal trait, we used the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) procedure controlling the FDR at 0.05 at each variant to account for multiple testing.

Correlation between effect sizes

We assessed the relationship between the effects of sequence variant on any two different traits by fitting a weighted linear regression model where the effects sizes for trait 1 was regressed on effect sizes for trait 2 and each variant was weighted by \(f\left( {1-f} \right)\) where \(f\) is the minor allele frequency of the variants, so that rare variants have less weight in the computation than common variants. For binary traits we used log(OR) as effect size.

Fraction of variance explained

The fraction of variance explained is calculated using the formula \(2f\left( {1 - f} \right)a^2\) where \(f\) is the minor allele frequency and \(a\) is the additive effect73. Calculating the fraction of variance explained for variants in the GWAS catalog, we estimated the effects of published variants with corresponding phenotypes available in the deCODE data and calculated the fraction of variance explained using f and a obtained from the Icelandic population.

Code availability

We used the following publicly available software for the whole-genome sequencing process:

for BWA 0.7.10 mem, see; for Picard tools 1.117, see; for SAMtools 1.3, see; for Bedtools v2.25.0-76-g5e7c696z, see; for GraphTyper 1.3, see; for Variant Effect Predictor, see

Data availability

The sequence variants from the Icelandic population whole-genome sequence data have been deposited at the European Variant Archive under accession PRJEB15197, GWAS summary statistics for association with P < 1 × 10−6 are available in Supplementary Data 5. The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article, it supplementary files, and upon request.


  1. 1.

    Ruth, N. & Peralta, V. 2015 Eye Banking Statistical Report. Eye Bank Assoc. Am. 3, 58–69 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bourne, W. M. Biology of the corneal endothelium in health and disease. Eye 17, 912–918 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Joyce, N. Proliferative capacity of corneal endothelial cells. Exp. Eye Res. 95, 16–23 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hamuro, J. et al. Cell homogeneity indispensable for regenerative medicine by cultured human corneal endothelial cells. Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 57, 4749 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zoega, G. M. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for cornea guttata in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Ophthalmology 113, 565–569 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    McCarey, B. E., Edelhauser, H. F. & Lynn, M. J. Review of corneal endothelial specular microscopy for FDA clinical trials of refractive procedures, surgical devices, and new intraocular drugs and solutions. Cornea 27, 1–16 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gao, X. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies WNT7B as a novel locus for central corneal thickness in Latinos. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 5035–5045 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Li, X. et al. Genetic association of COL5A1 variants in keratoconus patients suggests a complex connection between corneal thinning and keratoconus. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 2696–2704 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cuellar-Partida, G. et al. WNT10A exonic variant increases the risk of keratoconus by decreasing corneal thickness. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 5060–5068 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Igo, R. P. et al. Differing roles for TCF4 and COL8A2 in Central corneal thickness and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. PLoSONE 7, e46742 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lu, Y. et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify multiple loci associated with central corneal thickness and keratoconus. Nat. Genet. 45, 155–163 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Iglesias, A. I. et al. Cross-ancestry genome-wide association analysis of corneal thickness strengthens link between complex and Mendelian eye diseases. Nat. Commun. 9, 1864 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Vitart, V. et al. New loci associated with central cornea thickness include COL5A1, AKAP13 and AVGR8. Hum. Mol. Genet 19, 4304–4311 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Afshari, N. A. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies three novel loci in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Nat. Commun. 8, 14898 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu, N.-P., Smith, C. F., Bowling, B. L., Jonasson, F. & Klintworth, G. K. Macular corneal dystrophy types I and II are caused by distinct mutations in the CHST6 gene in Iceland. Mol. Vis. 12, 1148–52 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Adamis, A. P., Filatov, V. & Tripathi, B. J. Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. Surv. Ophthalmol. 38, 149–168 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sarnicola, C., Farooq, A. V. & Colby, K. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: update on pathogenesis and future directions. Eye Contact Lens 0, 1–10 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ebenesersdóttir, S. S. et al. Ancient genomes from Iceland reveal the making of a human population. Science 360, 1028–1032 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jonasson, F. et al. Macular corneal dystrophy in Iceland: a clinical, genealogic, and immunohistochemical study of 28 patients. Ophthalmology 103, 1111–1117 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gagnon, M. M., Boisjoly, H. M., Brunette, I., Charest, M. & Amyot, M. Corneal endothelial cell density in glaucoma. Cornea 16, 314–8 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gemenetzi, M., Yang, Y. & Lotery, A. J. Current concepts on primary open-angle glaucoma genetics: a contribution to disease pathophysiology and future treatment. Eye 26, 355–369 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tham, Y. C. et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121, 2081–2090 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cho, S. W., Kim, J. M., Choi, C. Y. & Park, K. H. Changes in corneal endothelial cell density in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 53, 569–573 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Shah, S., Laiquzzaman, M., Mantry, S. & Cunliffe, I. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 36, 508–513 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Shah, S., Laiquzzaman, M., Cunliffe, I. & Mantry, S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 29, 257–262 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhang, C. et al. Corneal hysteresis and progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 166, 29–36 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    De Moraes, C. V. G., Hill, V., Tello, C., Liebmann, J. M. & Ritch, R. Lower corneal hysteresis is associated with more rapid glaucomatous visual field progression. J. Glaucoma 21, 209–213 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Medeiros, F. A. et al. Corneal hysteresis as a risk factor for glaucoma progression: a prospective longitudinal study. Ophthalmology 120, 1533–1540 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hoffmann, E. M. et al. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with ocular parameters in a large central European cohort: the Gutenberg health study. PLoS ONE 8, e66158 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gudbjartsson, D. F. et al. Large-scale whole-genome sequencing of the Icelandic population. Nat. Genet. 47, 435–444 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jónsson, H. et al. Whole genome characterization of sequence diversity of 15,220 Icelanders. Sci. Data 4, 170115 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sveinbjornsson, G. et al. Weighting sequence variants based on their annotation increases power of whole-genome association studies. Nat. Genet. 48, 314–317 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kotecha, A., Elsheikh, A., Roberts, C. R., Zhu, H. & Garway-Heath, D. F. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47, 5337–5347 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Deol, M., Taylor, D. A. & Radcliffe, N. M. Corneal hysteresis and its relevance to glaucoma. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 26, 96–102 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mootha, V. V., Gong, X., Ku, H. C. & Xing, C. Association and familial segregation of CTG18.1 trinucleotide repeat expansion of TCF4 gene in Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 55, 33–42 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wieben, E. D. et al. A common trinucleotide repeat expansion within the transcription factor 4 (TCF4, E2-2) gene predicts Fuchs corneal dystrophy. PLoS ONE 7, e49083 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Riazuddin, S. A. et al. Replication of the TCF4 intronic variant in late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy and evidence of independence from the FCD2 locus. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 2825–2829 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Grant, S. Fa et al. Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 38, 320–323 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Meng, W. et al. A genome-wide association study provides evidence for association of chromosome 8p23 (MYP10) and 10q21.1 (MYP15) with high myopia in the French population. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 7983–7988 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nakanishi, H. et al. A genome-wide association analysis identified a novel susceptible locus for pathological myopia at 11q24.1. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000660 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Yi, L. et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify multiple loci associated with central corneal thickness and keratoconus. Nat. Genet. 45, 155–163 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Choquet, H. et al. A large multi-ethnic genome-wide association study identifies novel genetic loci for intraocular pressure. Nat. Commun. 8, 2108 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Benonisdottir, S. et al. Epigenetic and genetic components of height regulation. Nat. Commun. 7, 13490 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wood, A. R. et al. Defining the role of common variation in the genomic and biological architecture of adult human height. Nat. Genet. 46, 1173–1186 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Jonasson, F. et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Iceland: Reykjavik eye study. Eye 17, 747–753 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wagner, A. H. et al. Exon-level expression profiling of ocular tissues. Exp. Eye Res. 111, 105–111 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tian, L., Huang, K., Duhadaway, J. B., Prendergast, G. C. & Stambolian, D. Genomic profiling of miRNAs in two human lens cell lines. Curr. Eye Res. 35, 812–818 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Arora, A., McKay, G. J. & Simpson, D. A. C. Prediction and verification of miRNA expression in human and rat retinas. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 3962–3967 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jonasson, F., Johannsson, J. H., Garner, A. & Rice, N. S. C. Macular corneal dystrophy in iceland. Eye 3, 446–454 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Shiga, Y. et al. Genetic analysis of Japanese primary open-angle glaucoma patients and clinical characterization of risk alleles near CDKN2B-AS1, SIX6 and GAS7. PLoS ONE 12, e0186678 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gao, X. R., Huang, H., Nannini, D. R., Fan, F. & Kim, H. Genome-wide association analyses identify new loci influencing intraocular pressure. Hum. Mol. Genet 0, 1–9 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Pines, J. Cubism and the cell cycle: the many faces of the APC/C. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 427–438 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tanaka-Matakatsu, M., Thomas, B. J. & Du, W. Mutation of the Apc1 homologue shattered disrupts normal eye development by disrupting G1 cell cycle arrest and progression through mitosis. Dev. Biol. 309, 222–235 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Liu, B., McNally, S., Kilpatrick, J. I., Jarvis, S. P. & O’Brien, C. J. Aging and ocular tissue stiffness in glaucoma. Surv. Ophthalmol. 63, 56–74 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Estrada, K., Styrkarsdottir, U. & Evangelou, E. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture. Nat. Genet. 44, 491–501 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    MacArthur, J. et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res 45, D896–D901 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gal, R. L. et al. Factors predictive of corneal graft survival in the cornea donor study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 133, 246–254 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lass, J. H. et al. Endothelial cell density to predict endothelial graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch. Ophthalmol. 128, 63–69 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Eysteinsson, T. et al. Central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques: Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 80, 11–15 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Thorleifsson, G. et al. Common variants near CAV1 and CAV2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat. Genet. 42, 906–909 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sudlow, C. et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, e1001779 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bulik-Sullivan, B. K. et al. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Eggertsson, H. P. et al. Graphtyper enables population-scale genotyping using pangenome graphs. Nat. Genet. 49, 1654–1660 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kong, A. et al. Detection of sharing by descent, long-range phasing and haplotype imputation. Nat. Genet. 40, 1068–1075 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Wain, L. V. et al. Novel insights into the genetics of smoking behaviour, lung function, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (UK BiLEVE): a genetic association study in UK Biobank. Lancet Respir. Med. 3, 769–781 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Welsh, S., Peakman, T., Sheard, S. & Almond, R. Comparison of DNA quantification methodology used in the DNA extraction protocol for the UK Biobank cohort. BMC Genom. 18, 1–7 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Auton, A. et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    UK10K Consortium. The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease. Nature 526, 82–90 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    McCarthy, S. et al. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nat. Genet. 48, 1279–1283 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Generalized additive models. Stat. Sci. 1, 297–310 (1986).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Mantel, N. & Haenszel, W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 22, 719–48 (1959).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Gudbjartsson, D. F. et al. Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height. Nat. Genet. 40, 609–615 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the participants of the Icelandic deCODE health study for their valuable contribution to research. We also thank the staff at deCODE genetics recruitment center and core facilities, and all our colleagues, for their important collaboration on this work.

Author information




E.V.I., S.B., G.Thorleifsson, P.S., A.O., U.S., G.M.Z., U.T., D.F.G., F.J., H.H. and K.S. designed the study and interpreted the results. E.V.I., S.B., S.K., G.Thorleifsson, G.A.A. and D.F.G. analyzed the data. E.V.I., H.H., G.Thorgeirsson, I.J., G.Thorleifsson, G.A.A., G.M.Z. and F.J. performed recruitment and phenotyping. The manuscript was drafted by E.V.I., S.B., P.S., D.F.G., F.J., H.H. and K.S. All authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hilma Holm or Kari Stefansson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors E.V.I., S.B., G.Thorleifsson, P.S, A.O., U.S., S.K., G.A.A. G.Thorgeirsson, I.J., U.T., D.F.G., H.H., and K.S., declare competing financial interests as employees of deCODE genetics/Amgen, Inc. G.M.Z. and F.J. declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Chiea Chuen Khor and the other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ivarsdottir, E.V., Benonisdottir, S., Thorleifsson, G. et al. Sequence variation at ANAPC1 accounts for 24% of the variability in corneal endothelial cell density. Nat Commun 10, 1284 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing