Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Stronger influence of anthropogenic disturbance than climate change on century-scale compositional changes in northern forests


Predicting future ecosystem dynamics depends critically on an improved understanding of how disturbances and climate change have driven long-term ecological changes in the past. Here we assembled a dataset of >100,000 tree species lists from the 19th century across a broad region (>130,000km2) in temperate eastern Canada, as well as recent forest inventories, to test the effects of changes in anthropogenic disturbance, temperature and moisture on forest dynamics. We evaluate changes in forest composition using four indices quantifying the affinities of co-occurring tree species with temperature, drought, light and disturbance. Land-use driven shifts favouring more disturbance-adapted tree species are far stronger than any effects ascribable to climate change, although the responses of species to disturbance are correlated with their expected responses to climate change. As such, anthropogenic and natural disturbances are expected to have large direct effects on forests and also indirect effects via altered responses to future climate change.


Anthropogenic disturbance and climate change are two of the major drivers of terrestrial ecosystem dynamics worldwide1,2. Assessing the relative importance of these and other factors in causing past ecological change is of critical importance to predicting future ecological dynamics3,4, but empirical tests face several challenges. First, the time scale of available historical data might constrain our ability to detect the effects of particular global change drivers. For example, some studies that cover the past 40–50 years capture a period of more pronounced warming than land-use change and thus are perhaps more likely to detect climate change impacts5,6,7. Second, changes that are ascribed to one driver such as climate warming (e.g., elevational distribution shifts) might in fact, upon closer examination, be more likely explained by a different factor such as change in land use8,9,10. This is especially problematic for the warming of the twentieth century, which has been paralleled by major changes in anthropogenic disturbance regimes11, such that these two drivers of ecosystem dynamics can mask or modify each other’s effects. Finally, the influence of “climate” is often assessed by focusing only on temperature, while changes in precipitation can have equally large ecological impacts1,2. Clearly, there is a pressing need for explicit empirical tests of the influence of changes in temperature, precipitation and disturbance regimes on ecological communities across broad spatial and temporal scales.

Forests make major contributions to global biodiversity and ecosystem services and in some regions land surveys conducted during the nineteenth century provide unique opportunities to assess changes in forest composition over a period of time representing particularly drastic changes in both land use and climate12. Climate change affects tree recruitment, growth and mortality, and thus potentially forest composition and species’ geographic ranges13,14,15. However, the response of tree communities to climate change can be delayed16 or catalyzed17 due to demographic and dispersal processes, and to the simultaneous impacts of competition, land use and disturbance17,18,19. Anthropogenic disturbances imposed by land uses come in different forms (e.g., agricultural clearing, logging, anthropogenic fires), which collectively influence forest dynamics by conferring advantages to disturbance-adapted, early-successional, short-lived and fast-growing tree species, which over a period of decades or centuries are successively replaced by late-successional, long-lived, shade-tolerant species20,21,22. An increasing number of simulation-based studies have explored potentially interacting effects of disturbance and climate change on forest dynamics17,18, but it remains difficult to empirically test model predictions over relevant time frames23. Based on studies of pre-settlement and contemporary forest composition in eastern North America, a lively—and as yet unresolved—debate has arisen concerning the relative importance of disturbances vs. climate in driving regional-scale forest changes in recent centuries23,24,25,26.

Here we quantify changes in tree functional composition over the last century across a >130,000 km2 region in eastern Canada, at the ecotone between temperate and boreal forests (Fig. 1a), and test the relative importance of climate change and anthropogenic disturbance as drivers of these changes. Over this time period, this region has experienced substantial changes in temperature and moisture (Fig. 1b, c), and profound land-use changes linked to European settlement (i.e., rapid increase in disturbance rates due to the expansion of agriculture and industrial forestry27,28,29,30). We present a large dataset of early land survey observations (>100,000 taxa lists recorded between 1790 and 1900; Supplementary Fig. 1) and modern forest inventories conducted during 1980–2010, both aggregated to a 25 km2 grid (Supplementary Fig. 2). Under the hypothesis that climate change has been an important driver of forest dynamics, we test the prediction of a shift in forest composition toward more warm- and moisture-adapted tree species24,25, and a positive correlation of the magnitude of such changes with the magnitude of change in temperature and moisture. Similarly, under the hypothesis that anthropogenic disturbance has driven forest change, we test the prediction of a shift toward more disturbance-adapted species, correlated with areas of more intense human influences. We quantified functional community composition using four indices (calculated using independent data) that represent the average affinities of co-occurring taxa with temperature (community temperature index (CTI)), drought (community drought tolerance index (CDTI)), light (community shade tolerance index (CSTI)) and disturbance (community disturbance index (CDI)). The latter two indices are expected to respond to disturbance negatively and positively, respectively. Changes in climate-related community indices were then tested for statistical relationships with changes from 1901 to 1980 in mean annual temperature (ΔTemperature, Fig. 1b) and in the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (ΔSPEI, a moisture index based on the balance between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration; Fig. 1c). Changes in disturbance-related community indices were tested against changes in human population density since the early nineteenth century (ΔPopulation; Fig. 1d), the latter being a good proxy for historical changes in land-use intensity. Overall, we show an overriding influence of anthropogenic disturbances compared to climate change in driving tree community dynamics since the nineteenth century, with disturbance-related changes potentially slowing or accelerating future community shifts in response to changes in temperature and precipitation.

Fig. 1

Changes in temperature, moisture and population. Location of the study area (a), and changes from 1901 to 1980 in mean annual temperature (ΔTemperature; b) and in the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (ΔSPEI; c) and changes in population density since 1831 (ΔPopulation; d); see Methods for a description of data sources. SPEI is based on the difference between monthly precipitation and potential evapotranspiration, and negative values of ΔSPEI indicate an increase in drought, while positive values indicate an increase in moisture. Change in population density was calculated as the difference between population density in 1831 and the highest population density recorded since the end of the nineteenth century. Smoothed distributions are shown next to each map (vertical gray and red lines show 0 and mean values, respectively, and ΔPopulation was log-transformed)


Changes in functional composition

Before calculating community-level functional composition indices, scores across taxa were standardized to a common scale (0–1; see Methods, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2), such that the magnitudes of change in the four indices (Fig. 2) can be directly compared. The dominant temporal change was a shift toward more disturbance-adapted communities, with 92% of cells (25 km2) showing an increase in the community disturbance index (mean ΔCDI = 0.13; Fig. 2d). In comparison, we found clear but weaker trends toward communities composed of less shade-tolerant and less drought-tolerant species: 77% of cells showed a decrease in the community shade tolerance index (mean ΔCSTI was −0.06; Fig. 2c) and 77% of cells also showed a decrease in the community drought tolerance index (mean ΔCDTI = −0.05; Fig. 2b). In contrast, the community temperature index (ΔCTI) showed no clear trend on average, with a mean ΔCTI of 0.01 and high variance, including some grid cells with either strong decreases or increases (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2

Changes in functional composition. Changes in the community temperature index (ΔCTI; a), the community drought tolerance index (ΔCDTI; b), the community shade tolerance index (ΔCSTI; c) and the community disturbance index (ΔCDI; d) between 1790–1900 and 1980–2010. Smoothed distributions are shown next to each map (vertical gray and red lines show 0 and mean values, respectively). Detailed maps of community indices in each period are shown in Supplementary Figure 3

Correlation with changes in predictor variables

Linear mixed models showed that change in population density (ΔPopulation) had strong and significant effects—in the predicted directions—on both ΔCSTI (P < 0.001; Fig. 3c) and ΔCDI (P < 0.001; Fig. 3d). Conversely, while climatic predictors had significant effects on ΔCTI and ΔCDTI, the effects were relatively weak and opposite in direction to those predicted. Linear mixed models showed that the relationship between ΔTemperature and ΔCTI was significant only when controlling for changes in disturbance-related indices (i.e., ΔCDI and ΔCSTI; P = 0.011; Fig. 3a), with greater temperature increases associated with reductions in CTI. ΔCDTI tended to be higher (less negative) in areas with greater increases in the SPEI (Fig. 3b), and this relationship was non-significant when controlling for changes in disturbance-related indices (i.e., ΔCDI and ΔCSTI; P = 0.123, Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3

Relationships between changes in functional composition and potential predictors. Linear mixed models: a ΔCTI with ΔTemperature, b ΔCDTI with ΔSPEI and c, d ΔCSTI and ΔCDI with log-transformed ΔPopulation. Black lines and text show effects estimated by models with single predictors, while colored lines and text show effects after controlling for changes in other indices (see Methods). Red lines and text show effects after controlling for changes in disturbance-related indices (ΔCSTI and ΔCDI), while blue lines show effects after controlling for changes in climate-related indices (ΔCTI and ΔCDTI). P values are shown for each line and the conditional R2 values of single-predictor models are shown in the upper right corners. CTI community temperature index, CDTI community drought tolerance index, SPEI standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index, CSTI community shade tolerance index, CDI community disturbance index


These results point to a dominant role of anthropogenic disturbances underlying forest compositional changes during recent centuries in these northern temperate forests. Disturbance-related adaptations of different taxa were captured in two indices, one focused on well-established shade tolerance scores, CSTI31,32, thought to capture expected responses to severe disturbances (e.g., clear-cut logging, anthropogenic fire). The other index (CDI) was developed specifically for this study to capture expected responses to a wider range of disturbance severities (e.g., selective logging; see Methods, Supplementary Table 1). This CDI showed the strongest temporal changes, involving increases for a broad spectrum of disturbance-adapted taxa (e.g., early-successional Populus spp. and Betula papyrifera, as well as more shade-tolerant but logging-favored Acer spp. and Abies balsamea) at the expense of long-lived late-successional taxa (Picea spp., Tsuga canadensis, Fagus grandifolia; Supplementary Figure 4). The CSTI showed less pronounced changes, mostly linked to increases in early-successional deciduous taxa (Populus spp., Betula papyrifera; Supplementary Figure 4). These results are consistent with similar land-use-driven shifts toward more disturbance-adapted and less shade-tolerant taxa in recent centuries found for portions of northeastern North America further to the south23,33,34.

Our results provide no clear evidence of direct climate change impacts upon the composition of these forests over the twentieth century. Changes in the moisture regime can significantly influence forest dynamics, particularly through severe drought14,32,35,36, and as predicted our results showed a shift toward less drought-tolerant communities. However, the magnitude of such changes was not correlated with changes in moisture, and the shift in the average CDTI may have been a correlate of disturbance-driven changes. Taxon-level affinities with disturbance, light and drought were correlated to different degrees (Supplementary Table 3), and changes in CDTI were significantly affected by changes in the disturbance-related indices CSTI and CDI (Fig. 4b). ΔCDI and ΔCSTI were both negatively correlated with ΔCDTI (Fig. 4), mainly due to increases of the disturbance-adapted and drought-intolerant Abies balsamea37,38 at the expense of drought-tolerant, late-successional taxa such as Betula alleghaniensis, Picea spp. and Thuja occidentalis (Supplementary Figure 4). We found no average change in the CTI, and site-to-site variation in ΔCTI also appears to have been influenced by disturbance-related changes (Fig. 4a). Increased CTI was associated with increased CDI due to increases of disturbance- and warm-adapted Acer spp. and decreases of late-successional, cold-adapted Picea spp. (Supplementary Figure 4). Decreased CTI was associated with decreased CSTI due to increases of early-successional, cold-adapted Populus spp. and Betula papyrifera, with decreases at some sites of the warmest adapted, late-successional taxa (i.e., Tsuga canadensis, Betula alleghaniensis, Fagus grandifolia; Supplementary Figure 4). Overall, we detected no signal of warming-related changes, and while we cannot totally exclude some influence of an altered moisture regime on vegetation dynamics24,25, it is clear that any effects of climate change (altered temperature and/or rainfall) appear to have been dwarfed by the dominant influence of disturbance.

Fig. 4

Relationships between changes in different community indices. Linear mixed models: a ΔCTI against ΔCSTI and ΔCDI, and b ΔCDTI against ΔCSTI and ΔCDI. P values are shown for each line and the conditional R2 values are shown in the upper right corners. CTI community temperature index, CDTI community drought tolerance index, CSTI community shade tolerance index, CDI community disturbance index

Natural disturbances such as wildfire or insect outbreaks, the frequency and intensity of which have increased in many parts of the world as an indirect effect of climate change39,40, could also have played a role in the observed shift toward more disturbance-adapted tree communities. We are, however, confident in attributing past forest changes to the direct effects of anthropogenic disturbance rather than indirect effects of climate change via increased natural disturbance. First, fire frequency has actually declined in this region due to increased moisture41 as well as efficient fire suppression since the mid-twentieth century42. Second, while insect outbreaks have occurred cyclically during the twentieth century (principally Choristoneura fumiferana43 and Malacosoma disstria44), there is no indication of an increased outbreak frequency43. In addition, the tree species most affected by these defoliators (Abies balsamea, Populus tremuloides, Acer saccharum) are among the species that actually showed the strongest increases over time in our study area (Supplementary Figure 2). These considerations, along with the significant correlation between change in population density and both ΔCSTI and ΔCDI, provide clear evidence of an overriding influence of land-use-driven disturbances on long-term changes in the composition of forests in southern Québec.

Our results have important implications for understanding forest dynamics in an era of rapid global changes. First, changes in successional processes induced by disturbance represent more powerful drivers of forest dynamics compared to direct effect of climate change at the temporal scale of a century. Given ongoing changes in disturbance regimes that can be mediated by both land use45,46 and climate change39,40, we might expect that forest disturbance will significantly influence future responses to changes in temperature and moisture regime47,48. We found evidence of disturbance-induced compositional changes that countered the direction of expected warming-induced dynamics (e.g., increases in less warm-adapted taxa) despite the clear trend of increasing temperatures during the last century49. To the extent that these changes were driven by anthropogenic disturbance, this may help explain the frequently observed lags in responses of tree communities to recent warming16 and it suggests that disturbance may hinder forest ecosystems’ adaptation to the predicted temperature increase in the coming century50. At the same time, we found some disturbance impacts that appear to favor the same taxa expected to increase with greater moisture (e.g., increases in less drought-adapted taxa), thus potentially accelerating this aspect of climate-induced changes. However, the shift we observed towards less drought-tolerant tree communities took place during one of the wettest periods of the last five centuries in northeastern North America24,25, and if future droughts increase in intensity and frequency51, disturbance-related changes may exacerbate tree mortality and compromise forest resilience14. More generally, our study highlights how large-scale secondary succession and recovery processes induced by land use or other sources of disturbance, which may persist for decades to centuries48, could significantly influence the response of ecosystems to future climate change.


Tree community data

Preindustrial forest composition was characterized using early land survey data aggregated to a 25 km2 grid across southern Québec. Early land survey data were extracted from logbooks reporting the original surveys of 302 townships between 1790 and 1900 (Supplementary Figure 1). Surveys were conducted along the boundaries of the townships and subdividing range lines within townships (every 1.6 km, Supplementary Figure 1), where surveyors described the forest composition in the form of lists of taxa (e.g., hemlock, beech and maples) (note that these data were collected in a different way than the General Land Office data widely used to reconstruct past forests characteristics in the northeastern United States52). In total, 103,011 lists of taxa from 1790 to 1900 were precisely georeferenced using historical and modern digital cadastral maps and used in this study (Supplementary Figure 1). These observations were divided into two geometric types: point observations (69% of total observations, usually spaced 100–200 m apart) and line descriptions (31% of total observations and usually pertaining to one lot boundary of ~260 m). In order to incorporate these two data types in the same database, a weight was assigned to each observation that represented the length of line observations and the mean spacing of point observations (the mean distance to the previous and next observations53). Data were then aggregated to a 25 km2 grid; in each grid cell we estimated a taxon’s frequency (Supplementary Figure 2) as the cumulative weight of observations in which the taxon was mentioned divided by the total weight of observations. A previous study validated the high accuracy of this method to estimate the nineteenth-century forest composition by comparison with the results obtained using early forest inventories available for a restricted portion of the study area54.

Modern forest composition was quantified using the Québec government’s forest inventories since 1980. These inventories are based on 400 m2 circular plots distributed across different types of productive forest through stratified random sampling (Supplementary Figure 1). Only plots that were located within a maximum distance of 3 km from historical observations were retained, resulting in a total of 59,359 plots. The vast majority of plots have been continuously forested during the last century, with <1% of plots having developed on abandoned farmlands. Within these plots, all stems >9 cm diameter at breast height of each species were measured and inventoried and were used to compute species basal area per plot. Surveyors of the nineteenth century did not systematically distinguish all phylogenetically close species and thus several species had to be grouped at the genus level to match the taxa that were recorded by historical surveyors (Picea spp., Pinus spp., Acer spp., Populus spp.). Because the nineteenth-century surveyors only specified the most abundant taxa in their observations, we also controlled the number of taxa per modern plot in order to obtain more comparable datasets. Taxa that represented <5% of the total basal area of a modern plot were removed; this threshold was chosen to obtain roughly the same number of taxa per observation in both historical and modern datasets (Supplementary Figure 1). Modern taxa frequencies were finally aggregated to the 25 km2 grid by calculating number of plots where a taxon is present divided by the number of plots in the corresponding grid cell (Supplementary Figure 2).

Taxa and community indices

Changes in functional composition were quantified using indices that characterize the affinities of taxa within communities with temperature (CTI), drought (CDTI), light (CSTI) and disturbance (CDI). These community indices were calculated as follows. First, indices that quantify taxon-specific relationships with temperature, drought tolerance, shade tolerance and disturbance were assigned to the main 17 taxa present in the historical and modern datasets (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). The “taxon temperature index” (TTI) was calculated as the median annual temperature across the geographic range of a given taxon7,15,55 using interpolated annual surface temperature maps56 and continental scale distribution maps57. To assess the robustness of our analyses to the decision to use median temperatures, we also calculated variants of TTI using the mean, 10th percentile, and 90th percentile of temperatures across the geographic range of a given taxon (see Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Tables 4 and 5), with the latter two representing the cold and warm limits of distributions, respectively. Because none of these variants significantly changed the results (Supplementary Figure 7 and Supplementary Table 6), we report only results for the median in the main text. Taxon drought tolerance and shade tolerance indices (TDTI and TSTI, respectively, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2) were taken from a database of northern hemisphere trees and shrubs31,32. These indices were derived from a meta-analysis of published literature ranking taxa according to their drought and shade tolerance on a common scale (from low tolerance; 1, to high tolerance; 5); they have been frequently used to quantify tree functional composition32,58. The rankings obtained with our taxon climatic indices (TTI and TDTI) are also consistent with recent analyses of growth–climate relationships of restricted pools of taxa considered in our analysis37,38. Concerning disturbance-related indices, since TSTI mostly accounts for adaptions to severe stand-replacing disturbances (e.g., land clearing, clearcutting), we also developed for this study a more comprehensive taxon disturbance index (TDI) that considers adaptations to both severe and partial disturbances (e.g., partial cutting). TDI was calculated with a point system involving 11 key traits (Supplementary Tables 1) taken from various sources including the PLANTS and TRY databases59,60 and references on tree species ecology61,62. Five traits were considered primarily as adaptations to stand-replacing disturbances: shade tolerance, growth rate, longevity, age at sexual maturity and capacity of vegetative reproduction. Six additional traits were considered to reflect adaptations to both stand-replacing and partial disturbance: fruiting frequency, seed abundance, effective seed dispersal, germination substrate requirement, seedling vigor, and response to release. For each trait, the range of values across species was first standardized to vary from 0 to 1 (giving them equal weight) and then summed across traits for a given taxon to obtain TDI values.

For species grouped at the genus level (Picea spp., Pinus spp., Acer spp. and Populus spp.), values of TTI, TDTI, TSTI and TDI were averaged across the main species present in study area (our results were robust to various combinations of species included in these taxon-level values; see Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Tables 7 and 8, Supplementary Figures 8 and 9). For each time period separately, community indices were calculated for each 25 km2 grid cell as the weighted mean index value across taxa found in that grid cell, with weights determined by taxon frequency. In order to obtain values comparable across the four community-level indices, despite the different scales of taxon-level indices, all taxon-level indices were first standardized to vary from 0 to 1 among taxa prior to calculations of community-level indices (Supplementary Table 2). Thus, each community index potentially ranges from 0 to 1 (Supplementary Figure 3), and changes in community indices (the difference between the 1980–2010 and 1790–1900 periods) potentially range between −1 and 1.

Climate and population density data

Climate data were obtained at the 25 km2 grid scale for the 1901–1980 period using BIOSIM 10 software63. The year 1901 corresponds to the earliest date for which accurate climate records are available in our study area, while 1980 correspond to the earliest modern inventories used in the analysis. Changes in mean annual temperature were calculated as the linear slope of mean annual temperature per calendar year for each cell separately. To assess changes in moisture regime, we used the SPEI, which is based on the difference between monthly precipitation and temperature-induced potential evapotranspiration64. Negative values of SPEI indicate dry events, with values < −1.5 commonly considered as severe drought, while positive values indicate wet events. The 24-month SPEI between January 1901 and December 1980 were calculated in R using the SPEI package65 and changes in SPEI were calculated with the linear slope of SPEI per month for each cell separately.

In the absence of precise and extensive data on land-use history over the relevant spatial and temporal scales in our study area, we used changes in human population density since the early nineteenth century as a proxy for the intensity of anthropogenic disturbances over this time period. Sub-regions of our study area experienced their most intense periods of land use at different times. For example, some areas reached their peak in agricultural development and rural population as early as the end of the nineteenth century28, shortly after surveyors opened the territory for settlement (Supplementary Figures 1 and 5). Other regions reached such peaks between the middle and the end the twentieth century29. In order to account for this heterogeneity, we computed changes in mean population density between 1831 and, for each cell separately, the maximum mean population density recorded in one of the three subsequent censuses in 1871, 1951 or 2001 (see details in Supplementary Figure 5), which represent three key periods of land-use history in our study area28,29. Data from the 1831 and 1871 censuses have been made available by the Centre Interuniversitaire d’Études Québecoises (CIEQ; Projet GÉORIA, version 2003) and data from the 1951 and 2001 censuses are freely available on the Canada’s Century Research Infrastructure (CCRI) website (

Statistical analysis

Relationships between changes in community indices and potential predictors were tested with linear mixed effects models, which were constructed in R with the nlme package66. In all models, we accounted for natural biogeographic variation in forest composition by first conducting a spatially constrained clustering of 25 km2 cells based on preindustrial composition and then using the six resulting groups (see Supplementary Figure 6) as a random factor in all models. Spatial autocorrelation was taken into account within cluster groups using an exponential spatial correlation structure constructed with the corExp function contained in the nlme package66. We first tested for individual effects of potential predictors on community indices: we tested effects of ΔTemperature on ΔCTI, of ΔSPEI on ΔCDTI and of ΔPopulation on both ΔCSTI and ΔCDI. Second, because taxon-level affinities with disturbance, light and drought were correlated to some degree (Supplementary Table 3), we tested effects of potential predictors after controlling for changes in other community indices32. Effects of ΔTemperature on ΔCTI and of ΔSPEI on ΔCDTI were tested after accounting for changes in disturbance-related indices (i.e., ΔCSTI and ΔCDI). Conversely, effects of changes in population density on ΔCSTI and ΔCDI were tested after accounting for changes in climate change-related indices (i.e., ΔCTI and ΔCDTI). Finally, we tested correlations between changes in climate- and disturbance-related community indices, with ΔCTI or ΔCDTI as dependent variables (separately) and ΔCSTI and ΔCDI as predictors.

Code availability

The code used to fit mixed models can be made available from the corresponding author upon request.

Data availability

The historical data that support the findings of this study are available from the Laboratoire d’Écologie Historique et de Dendrochronologie ( upon reasonable request. Modern forest data are freely available from the Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec website (


  1. 1.

    Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W. & Courchamp, F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 15, 365–377 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Franklin, J., Serra-Diaz, J. M., Syphard, A. D. & Regan, H. M. Global change and terrestrial plant community dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3725–3734 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Willis, K. J. et al. How can a knowledge of the past help to conserve the future? Biodiversity conservation and the relevance of long-term ecological studies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 362, 175–187 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Petit, R. J., Hu, F. S. & Dick, C. W. Forests of the past: a window to future changes. Science 320, 1450–1452 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Beckage, B. et al. A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4197–4202 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    De Frenne, P. et al. Microclimate moderates plant responses to macroclimate warming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18561–18565 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Savage, J. & Vellend, M. Elevational shifts, biotic homogenization and time lags in vegetation change during 40 years of climate warming. Ecography 38, 546–555 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bodin, J. et al. Shifts of forest species along an elevational gradient in Southeast France: climate change or stand maturation? J. Veg. Sci. 24, 269–283 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Foster, J. R. & D’Amato, A. W. Montane forest ecotones moved downslope in northeastern USA in spite of warming between 1984 and 2011. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 4497–4507 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ameztegui, A., Coll, L., Brotons, L. & Ninot, J. M. Land-use legacies rather than climate change are driving the recent upward shift of the mountain tree line in the Pyrenees. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 263–273 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ellis, E. C. et al. Used planet: a global history. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7978–7985 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Vellend, M., Brown, C. D., Kharouba, H. M., McCune, J. L. & Myers-Smith, I. H. Historical ecology: using unconventional data sources to test for effects of global environmental change. Am. J. Bot. 100, 1294–1305 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fisichelli, N. A., Frelich, L. E. & Reich, P. B. Temperate tree expansion into adjacent boreal forest patches facilitated by warmer temperatures. Ecography 37, 152–161 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Clark, J. S. et al. The impacts of increasing drought on forest dynamics, structure, and biodiversity in the United States. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2329–2352 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Fadrique, B. et al. Widespread but heterogeneous responses of Andean forests to climate change. Nature 564, 207–212 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sittaro, F., Paquette, A., Messier, C. & Nock, C. A. Tree range expansion in eastern North America fails to keep pace with climate warming at northern range limits. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3292–3301 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Vanderwel, M. C. & Purves, D. W. How do disturbances and environmental heterogeneity affect the pace of forest distribution shifts under climate change? Ecography 37, 10–20 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Liang, Y., Duveneck, M. J., Gustafson, E. J., Serra-Diaz, J. M. & Thompson, J. R. How disturbance, competition, and dispersal interact to prevent tree range boundaries from keeping pace with climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 335–351 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Miller, K. M. & McGill, B. J. Land use and life history limit migration capacity of eastern tree species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 57–67 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Grime, J. P. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties (Wiley, London, 2006).

  21. 21.

    Frelich, L. E. in (ed.) Lee E. Frelich Forest Dynamics and Disturbance Regimes: Studies from Temperate Evergreen-Deciduous Forests 90–123 (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2002).

  22. 22.

    Turner, M. G. & Gardner, R. H. in (eds.) Monica G. Turner and Robert H. Gardner Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process 175–228 (Springer, New York, 2015).

  23. 23.

    Nowacki, G. J. & Abrams, M. D. Is climate an important driver of post-European vegetation change in the Eastern United States? Glob. Change Biol. 21, 314–334 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    McEwan, R. W., Dyer, J. M. & Pederson, N. Multiple interacting ecosystem drivers: toward an encompassing hypothesis of oak forest dynamics across eastern North America. Ecography 34, 244–256 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pederson, N. et al. Climate remains an important driver of post-European vegetation change in the eastern United States. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2105–2110 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Abrams, M. D. & Nowacki, G. J. Large-scale catastrophic disturbance regimes can mask climate change impacts on vegetation - a reply to Pederson et al. (2014). Glob. Change Biol. 24, 395–396 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    MacDowell, L. S. An Environmental History of Canada (UBC Press, Vancouver, 2012).

  28. 28.

    Domon, G. & Bouchard, A. The landscape history of Godmanchester (Quebec, Canada): two centuries of shifting relationships between anthropic and biophysical factors. Landsc. Ecol. 22, 1201–1214 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ruiz, J. & Domon, G. Analysis of landscape pattern change trajectories within areas of intensive agricultural use: case study in a watershed of southern Québec, Canada. Landsc. Ecol. 24, 419–432 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Boucher, Y., Arseneault, D., Sirois, L. & Blais, L. Logging pattern and landscape changes over the last century at the boreal and deciduous forest transition in Eastern Canada. Landsc. Ecol. 24, 171–184 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Niinemets, Ü. & Valladares, F. Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecol. Monogr. 76, 521–547 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang, T., Niinemets, Ü., Sheffield, J. & Lichstein, J. W. Shifts in tree functional composition amplify the response of forest biomass to climate. Nature 556, 99 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Thompson, J. R., Carpenter, D. N., Cogbill, C. V. & Foster, D. R. Four centuries of change in northeastern United States forests. PLoS ONE 8, e72540 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Goring, S. J. et al. Novel and lost forests in the upper Midwestern United States, from new estimates of settlement-era composition, stem density, and biomass. PLoS ONE 11, e0151935 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    McIntyre, P. J. et al. Twentieth-century shifts in forest structure in California: denser forests, smaller trees, and increased dominance of oaks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1458–1463 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Millar, C. I. & Stephenson, N. L. Temperate forest health in an era of emerging megadisturbance. Science 349, 823–826 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Huang, J. et al. Radial growth response of four dominant boreal tree species to climate along a latitudinal gradient in the eastern Canadian boreal forest. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 711–731 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    D’Orangeville, L. et al. Beneficial effects of climate warming on boreal tree growth may be transitory. Nat. Commun. 9, 3213 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Seidl, R. et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 395–402 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sommerfeld, A. et al. Patterns and drivers of recent disturbances across the temperate forest biome. Nat. Commun. 9, 4355 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Drobyshev, I. et al. Strong gradients in forest sensitivity to climate change revealed by dynamics of forest fire cycles in the post Little Ice Age era: forest fires in post LIA era. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 122, 2605–2616 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Cardil, A., Lorente, M., Boucher, D., Boucher, J. & Gauthier, S. Factors influencing fire suppression success in the province of Quebec (Canada). Can. J. For. Res. (2018).

  43. 43.

    Boulanger, Y. & Arseneault, D. Spruce budworm outbreaks in eastern Quebec over the last 450 years. Can. J. For. Res. 34, 1035–1043 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cooke, B. J. & Lorenzetti, F. The dynamics of forest tent caterpillar outbreaks in Québec, Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 226, 110–121 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Meyfroidt, P. & Lambin, E. F. Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36, 343–371 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Turner, M. G. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91, 2833–2849 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Johnstone, J. F. et al. Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 369–378 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gennaretti, F. et al. Bayesian multiproxy temperature reconstruction with black spruce ring widths and stable isotopes from the northern Quebec taiga. Clim. Dyn. 49, 4107–4119 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 2013).

  51. 51.

    Cook, B. I., Smerdon, J. E., Seager, R. & Coats, S. Global warming and 21st century drying. Clim. Dyn. 43, 2607–2627 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Larsen, C. P. S., Tulowiecki, S. J., Wang, Y.-C. & Trgovac, A. B. Predicting historic forest composition using species lists in presettlement land survey records, western New York. Appl. Veg. Sci. 18, 481–492 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Dupuis, S., Arseneault, D. & Sirois, L. Change from pre-settlement to present-day forest composition reconstructed from early land survey records in eastern Québec, Canada. J. Veg. Sci. 22, 564–575 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Terrail, R., Arseneault, D., Fortin, M.-J., Dupuis, S. & Boucher, Y. An early forest inventory indicates high accuracy of forest composition data in pre-settlement land survey records. J. Veg. Sci. 25, 691–702 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Feeley, K. J., Hurtado, J., Saatchi, S., Silman, M. R. & Clark, D. B. Compositional shifts in Costa Rican forests due to climate-driven species migrations. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 3472–3480 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Little, E. L. & Viereck, L. A. Atlas of United States trees. Vol. 5 (US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, 1971).

  58. 58.

    Marks, C. O., Muller-Landau, H. C. & Tilman, D. Tree diversity, tree height and environmental harshness in eastern and western North America. Ecol. Lett. 19, 743–751 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    USDA & NRCS. The PLANTS Database (National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, 2017).

  60. 60.

    Kattge, J. et al. TRY - a global database of plant traits. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2905–2935 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Burns, R. M. & Honkala B. H. Silvics of North America (U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, 1990).

  62. 62.

    Wonkka, C. L., Lafon, C. W., Hutton, C. M. & Joslin, A. J. A CSR classification of tree life history strategies and implications for ice storm damage. Oikos 122, 209–222 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Régnière, J., Saint-Amant, R. & Béchard, A. BioSIM 10: User’s Manual (Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Services, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, 2014).

  64. 64.

    Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S. & López-Moreno, J. I. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J. Clim. 23, 1696–1718 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Beguería, S. & Vicente-Serrano, S. M. SPEI: Calculation of the Standardised Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index. (2017).

  66. 66.

    Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3, 1–117 (2016).

Download references


The authors thank Jean Noël and Marie-Claude Lambert for their help with the modern forest inventories and climate data and Byron Moldofsky, Laurent Richard and Marc St-Hilaire for their help with historical population density data. This project was financially supported by the Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec (MFFP, project #142332085), the Fonds de Recherche du Québec Nature et Technologies (FRQNT), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Chaire de recherche sur la forêt habitée (UQAR) and through a MITACS-sponsored industrial partnership with the forest product company Rayonier Advanced Materials (La Sarre, QC).

Author information




V.D. and D.A. designed the study and methodology with substantial inputs from M.V., Y. Boucher and J.L. S.D., G.F., M.L. A.d.R., R.T. and V.D. extracted and compiled the historical data. V.D. analyzed the data. V.D. wrote the first draft with substantial inputs from D.A., M.V., Y. Boucher, J.L. and Y. Bergeron.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Danneyrolles.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danneyrolles, V., Dupuis, S., Fortin, G. et al. Stronger influence of anthropogenic disturbance than climate change on century-scale compositional changes in northern forests. Nat Commun 10, 1265 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing