Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Higher order effects in organic LEDs with sub-bandgap turn-on

Matters Arising to this article was published on 15 October 2019


Spin-dependent nonlinear processes in organic materials such as singlet-fission and triplet-triplet annihilation could increase the performance for photovoltaics, detectors, and light emitting diodes. Rubrene/C60 light emitting diodes exhibit a distinct low voltage (half-bandgap) threshold for emission. Two origins for the low voltage turn-on have been proposed: (i) Auger assisted energy up-conversion, and (ii) triplet-triplet annihilation. We test these proposals by systematically altering the rubrene/C60 interface kinetics by introducing thin interlayers. Quantitative analysis of the unmodified rubrene/C60 device suggests that higher order processes can be ruled out as the origin of the sub-bandgap turn-on. Rather, band-to-band recombination is the most likely radiative recombination process. However, insertion of a bathocuproine layer yields a 3-fold increase in luminance compared to the unmodified device. This indicates that suppression of parasitic interface processes by judicious modification of the interface allows a triplet-triplet annihilation channel to be observed.


Spin-transport in organic materials and coherent spin processes like singlet-fission (SF) and triplet-triplet annihilation (TTA) have gained recent interest in the scientific community due to the possibility to observe and study quantum phenomena at room temperature. Additionally, the comparably long relaxation times in organic materials may enable quantum-based information storage and logic devices. In the established areas of organic photovoltaics (OPVs) and organic light-emitting diodes (OLED), SF and TTA are promising mechanisms for enhanced device performance. SF enables increased current density in photovoltaic applications and high quantum yields and increased response in detector applications. In OLEDs, TTA enables device performance above the 25% emission efficiency limit of singlet emitters, as three-fourth of injected carriers form triplets and only ¼th will form singlet exciton states. Another benefit of triplet-based OLEDs is a possible reduction in the drive voltage that, despite recent success of OLEDs in small format displays, remains relatively high compared to LEDs based on compound semiconductors like GaAs or InGaAs. In OLEDs, the applied potential for effective emission is often observed to be on the order of the optical bandgap1,2,3 that in turn leads to confusion and potential misinterpretation if a “sub-bandgap” or low turn-on voltage is observed.

Recently, OLED devices have been reported with electroluminescence (EL) turn-on at voltages less than half of the optical gap based on both polymer4 and small-molecule emitters5. One of the most commonly studied devices uses the small-molecule rubrene as emitter and hole transporter and the fullerene C60 as the electron transporter. In these devices, two distinct mechanisms have been proposed for the low-voltage EL: an Auger-assisted energy up-conversion process at the heterojunction interface6,7, or Dexter transfer of triplet charge transfer (CT) states into triplet exciton states, followed by TTA to produce an emitting singlet8,9,10. In both cases, the non-linear charge dynamics at the rubrene/C60 interface are crucial to the mechanism.

In this report, we study OLED devices where we systematically alter the rubrene/C60 interface to vary the CT-state formation and recombination rates via the introduction of (i) a thin bathocuproine (BCP) interlayer (1–5 nm), that should significantly suppress CT-state formation from singlets and CT-state non-radiative recombination or (ii) a mixed rubrene/C60 interlayer that should greatly enhance the role of the interface in total device performance. Our results show that non-linear processes such as TTA and Auger are inconsistent with the device current–voltage characteristics. However, when parasitic interface pathways are suppressed, evidence for a TTA process is observed.


Qualitative device measurements

Heterojunction OLEDs based on rubrene/C60 interfaces with or without a thin (0–5 nm) interlayer of BCP or co-evaporated rubrene:C60 (1:1 by mass ratio) was fabricated. The active layers were evaporated onto Glass/ITO/PEDOT:PSS:Nafion substrates, with PEDOT:PSS:Nafion acting as the hole injection layer (HIL), and capped by BCP/Al acting as electron injection layer. The composition of the mixed PEDOT:PSS:Nafion HIL was tuned to provide a higher work function (−5.3 eV to −5.8 eV11,12,13,14,15) and closer energetic match to the highest occupied molecular orbital, HOMO, of the rubrene emission layer. Throughout the manuscript we will use the chemical nomenclature of HOMO to describe the ionization potential and hole transport level and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) to describe the electron affinity and electron transport level. Bandgap will refer to the HOMO–LUMO separation, while optical gap will refer to the absorption onset. Shown in Fig. 1 are the chemical structures of rubrene and C60 as well as the architectures used for the devices reported within this manuscript.

Fig. 1

Molecular structures and energy level diagrams. Molecular structures of (a) rubrene and (b) C60. Energy level diagrams of devices with (c) BCP interlayer and (d) mixed rubrene:C60 (1:1) interlayer. Highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) values for rubrene and C60 taken from refs. 6, 7, 10, 51, BCP values taken from refs. 18, 19. Range of commonly reported work functions for PEDOT:PSS:Nafion, for 10% Nafion, the expected work function is near 5.5 eV11,12,13,14,15

Shown in Fig. 2 are the current density, J(V)-characteristics, and luminance, L(V)-characteristics, for control devices fabricated with no C60 ETL (rubrene only) and with no interface modification (BCP, 0 nm). Also shown are the BCP interlayer and rubrene:C60 interlayer devices. The reference rubrene-only device exhibits a forward bias turn-on of the injection current near 2.0 V and of the luminescence near 2.8 V, which is above the ≈2.2 eV optical bandgap of rubrene. The observed L(V)-characteristics match the results by He et al.16. The rubrene/C60 control device exhibits a forward bias turn-on near 0.8 eV, and an earlier luminescence turn-on voltage of about 1 V, coinciding with half the optical gap of rubrene, in close agreement with earlier literature reports6,7,8,9,10. Similarly, the variation and magnitude of the magneto-electroluminescence (MEL) response (Supplementary Note 1 - Supplementary Figure 3) is in accord with earlier literature9. The introduction of the thin BCP interlayers or thin rubrene:C60 intermixed layers does not significantly alter the J(V)-characteristics of the devices; however, a significant effect on the luminescence of the OLED is observed. The mixed interlayer suppresses luminance by an order of magnitude, while an increase in emitted light intensity can be observed for thin (1–3) nm BCP interlayers. In contrast, a thick >5 nm BCP interlayer decreases the device luminance.

Fig. 2

OLED device characteristic. J(V)- and L(V)-characteristics of rubrene/C60 OLEDs with BCP or rubrene:C60 (1:1) interlayers inserted between the rubrene and C60 layers. A plot on linear scale can be found in Supplementary Figure 1

For all devices studied, the spectral response is invariant and matches the reported EL and photoluminescence spectra for rubrene (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figure 2)5,6. In an earlier study of thick (40 nm) mixed interlayers, strong emission at ~870 nm was observed and attributed to CT-state emission17. We observe a very weak luminescence feature at 870 nm (≈1.4 eV) in the case of the 5 nm thick rubrene:C60 mixed interlayer. The very similar J(V)-characteristics of the devices with and without BCP interlayers (<5 nm) suggests that charge carrier transport across the nominally insulating layer is possible and is only compromised for thick BCP layers. This may be due to a trap assisted hopping of electrons across the interlayer similar to that observed at the C60/BCP/metal electrode18,19, direct tunneling, or percolation across a non-continuous layer. In devices limited by interface recombination20, an exponential decrease in current with spacer thickness has been reported.

Fig. 3

Emission spectra. a Electroluminescence spectra of rubrene/C60 OLEDs with BCP or rubrene:C60 (1:1) interlayers inserted between the rubrene and C60 layers. For comparison, a control device (rubrene/C60) with no interlayer is shown. b The emission data normalized to the maximum (in the wavelength range 600–610 nm). All spectra were recorded at a current level of 18.75 mA/cm2

The devices in Fig. 2 were additionally characterized with respect to their performance as heterojunction solar cells. Shown in Fig. 4 are the J(V)-characteristics under AM 1.5 illumination. With increasing BCP interlayer thickness, a monotonic decrease in short-circuit current density (Jsc) is observed. The devices with mixed rubrene:C60 interlayers (2 and 5) nm exhibit similar photocurrent relative to the rubrene/C60 control, suggesting that absorption and/or exciton transport in the rubrene is current limiting.

Fig. 4

OPV device characteristic. J(V)-characteristics of rubrene/C60 devices operated as solar cells with BCP or rubrene:C60 interlayer thicknesses between 1  and 5 nm under AM1.5 conditions. For comparison, a reference heterojunction rubrene/C60 without the either of the two interlayers is shown

Shown in Fig. 5 is a summary of the OLED- and OPV-relevant characteristics for the various BCP and rubrene:C60 interlayer thicknesses. The luminescence at 2 V bias shows a maximum at about 2–3 nm of BCP interlayer thickness, corresponding to a threefold increase compared to the reference device. In contrast, the introduction of the mixed rubrene:C60 layer leads to a radical decrease in luminescence with interlayer thickness. This is in agreement with recent observations of Chen et al.9 for a mixed rubrene:C60 active layer. Strikingly, the short-circuit density in PV operation of the mixed interlayers seems to be independent of interlayer thickness, but decreases exponentially with BCP interlayer thickness. CT states are bound by long-range Coulombic interactions, thus the influence of a spacer can be complex, modifying both CT-state binding energy21 and formation and dissociation rates22,23. As will be discussed later, the exponential decrease in OPV Jsc with BCP layer thickness indicates that CT-state recombination is not rate limiting and the increase in luminesce arises from a decrease in parasitic singlet quenching via CT-state formation.

Fig. 5

Device summary. a Luminance of rubrene/C60 OLEDs as a function of interlayer thickness. b Short-circuit current of rubrene/C60 PV devices under AM 1.5 conditions as a function of interlayer thickness. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation of four devices. Lines are guides to the eye

A closer look at the sub-bandgap “turn-on”

In order to understand the origin of the sub-bandgap turn-on and further explore the role of higher order recombination processes such as Auger-assisted up-conversion at the heterojunction interface or TTA, we examine the L(J)-characteristics and J(V)-characteristics more closely. First, we investigate the J(V)-characteristics to gain information on the recombination order via analysis of the diode ideality factor n. For a classic semiconductor, the diode ideality factor depends on the order of recombination as n = 2/order, e.g., n = 2 (order = 1) for monomolecular (presumably from trap-assisted recombination or surface recombination), n = 1 (order = 2) for bimolecular, and n = 2/3 (order = 3) for trimolecular or Auger recombination24,25. Although the diode equation and ideality were derived for inorganic pn-junctions with well-defined band structure and delocalized free charge carriers, Giebink et al. have shown that a similar diode equation can be derived for organic heterojunctions where charge transport in an intrinsic material characterized by a transport level is dominated by hopping through tightly bound localized states26,27. Again, just like in the inorganic case, bimolecular recombination at the donor/acceptor interface is characterized by an ideality of unity, and trap-assisted recombination yields an ideality larger than unity.

Shown in Fig. 6 are the J(V)- and L(V)-characteristics of the reference rubrene/BCP, the rubrene/C60 heterojunction, and the optimized device with 3 nm BCP interlayer, as well as fits to the J(V) data using a one-diode-equivalent circuit model based on Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics:

$$J = J_0\left( {e^{\frac{{V - R_{\mathrm{S}}J}}{{nV_{\mathrm{t}}}}} - 1} \right) + \frac{{V - R_{\mathrm{S}}J}}{{R_{\mathrm{P}}}},$$

where Rs and Rp are a series and parallel shunt resistance that depend on the morphology within the device as well as macroscopic connections.

Fig. 6

Equivalent circuit fit. J(V)- and L(J)-characteristics of rubrene/C60 OLEDs, (a) reference device with no C60 ETL, (b) baseline device without BCP interlayer, (c) optimized device with 3 nm BCP interlayer. Broken red lines correspond to a fit to a 1-diode-equivalent circuit model and modified exponential term in case of the J(V)- and L(V)-characteristics, respectively

The J(V)-data can be reasonably well represented by the 1-diode model over a wide range of bias voltages; the results of the fit to the model are summarized in Table 1. We also determine an ideality factor from the L(V) data by fitting the region around the turn-on voltage (1 V for the rubrene/C60-based devices and 2 V for the rubrene/BCP device) with an exponential of the form:

Table 1 Summary of the 1-diode-equivalent circuit model

\({{L}} = {{L}}_0\left( {{{e}}^{\frac{{{V}}}{{{{nV}}_{{{\mathrm{t}}}}}}} - 1} \right)\). We restrict the range, as for large bias voltages the current density through the device is limited by the series resistance Rs, and for small voltages, the current is dominated by Rp. Note that the L(V)-data after turn-on matches the shape of the J(V) data. The luminance ideality factor is also given in Table 1.

We observe an ideality factor of 2 in case of the rubrene/BCP device, pointing towards trap-assisted recombination or injection-limited current such that the device is limited by monomolecular recombination. Charge carrier injection limitations are supported by the relatively large series resistance. For the two C60-based devices, that exhibit half-bandgap thresholds, the diode ideality factor is between 1.4 and 1.6. This effectively rules out Auger recombination and a coherent triplet formation process (see Supplementary Note 2: Considerations on Diode Ideality) as dominant processes in the device at these bias voltages and suggests a combination of mono- and bimolecular recombination as is typically observed in organic devices28,29.

A drift-diffusion model without higher order recombination

The absence of evidence for Auger recombination (diode ideality factor of 2/3) or fourth-order processes (coherent TTA) suggests that higher order up-conversion processes are not required to explain the low-voltage EL and indicates that it can be understood in the same framework as inorganic pn-junction LEDs, where low-voltage EL is commonplace. In a classic pn-junction LED, the EL stems from the ideal diode minority carrier diffusion current (that is simply band-to-band recombination in the quasi-neutral regions, following Eq. (1)) and thus can be observed at arbitrarily low bias set by the sensitivity of the photon detection system. This is rigorously established through the generalized Planck equation for luminescent radiation derived by Würfel30 that has been successfully applied to OPV devices31,32 and is such a common occurrence for inorganic LEDs that it is rarely commented upon33,34,35,36,37. Contrary to this, in the field of organic electronics, the built-in potential (built-in voltage Vbi) is often viewed as difference between the transport levels and as such approximately the bandgap of the semiconductor. This leads to the believe that the turn-on voltage in OLEDs, which is roughly the built-in voltage, must be equivalent to the bandgap of the material. However, from the point of view of a classical homojunction and its adaption to organic materials, the built-in potential is smaller than the bandgap as does the turn-on of the device, see Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Figure 4.

To determine if the low-voltage turn-on and half-gap luminesce are consistent with classic heterojunction diodes with reduced built-in voltage due to transport gap offsets, we performed drift-diffusion simulations of the entire device structure using the open source device simulator GPVDM (Ver. 4.98.011) developed by R.C.I. MacKenzie38,39,40. Detailed information on how the simulator solves the drift-diffusion and Poisson-equation can be found elsewhere41. For simplicity, we simulate the J(V)-characteristics of the reference rubrene/C60 device allowing bimolecular recombination, R = k(np − ni2), from free holes and electrons only. The bimolecular recombination rate k was assumed to be of the value of Langevin recombination rate determined by the electron and hole mobilities throughout the device. It is well known that organic materials exhibit tail states extending from the transport edge into the bandgap. To effectively simulate transport via these states, we replaced the HOMO/LUMO energies of rubrene and C60 with an effective energy representing the tail states. It is reasonable to assume that disorder will lead to 1015 cm−3 to 1016 cm−3 trap states that might reach up to 50–150 meV further into the gap. This leads us to an effective transport gap of 2 eV in case of the rubrene and 1.85 eV in case of C60. A detailed summary of all simulation parameters in the GPVDM notation can be found in Supllementary Note 4 - Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2.

Shown in Fig. 7 are the simulated J(V)-characteristics in direct comparison with the experimental J(V) curve obtained for the rubrene/C60 heterojunction device, as well as the obtained luminance and its derived parameters. Note the good agreement between the experimental and simulated diode characteristics. The simulation produces the early-voltage turn-on despite not including any TTA or Auger recombination. Additionally, the model predicts the nominal linear dependence of luminescence on current. However, the diode ideality is not captured perfectly as bimolecular recombination inherently is characterized by an ideality of 1.

Fig. 7

Drift diffusion modeling. Simulated and experimental J(V)-characteristics of a rubrene/C60 ( 40 nm/20 nm) heterojunction (a). Also shown are the band diagram (b) and the bimolecular recombination rate within the device (c) at 0.8 V. L(J), ∂log(L)/ ∂log(J), and the internal quantum efficiency are shown in df. In case of the simulation, the internal quantum efficiency, and in case of the experimental data, the external quantum efficiency are shown. Note all recombination within the device is bimolecular recombination of free charge carriers. The simulation included a series resistance of 25 Ω corresponding to the ITO and wire resistances and a 35 MΩ shunt resistance

A rate equation-based model

While neither TTA nor Auger are necessary to describe the current and luminescence of the baseline rubrene/C60 device, the increase in luminescence with BCP layer thickness suggests that interface kinetics are relevant to the interlayer modified devices. We investigate this with a detailed kinetic model for CT-state-mediated singlet production. Assuming the injected current leads to the formation of CT states at the interface and triplets (T) and singlets (S) in the rubrene layer of the heterojunction device via incoherent pooling, the steady-state rate equations are:

$$\frac{{{\mathrm{d}}n}}{{{\mathrm{d}}t}} = \frac{{{\mathrm{d}}p}}{{{\mathrm{d}}t}} = \frac{J}{{qa_0}} - knp + k_{{\mathrm{CT}},{\mathrm{diss}}}{\mathrm{CT}} = 0,$$
$$\begin{array}{l}\frac{{{\mathrm{dCT}}}}{{{\mathrm{d}}t}} = c_{{\mathrm{CT}}} \times knp - k_{{\mathrm{CT}},{\mathrm{diss}}}{\mathrm{CT}} - k_{{\mathrm{CT,}T}}{\mathrm{CT}} - k_{{\mathrm{CT}},{\mathrm{rec}}}\,{\mathrm{CT}}\\ + k_{{T,{\mathrm{CT}}}}T + k_{S,{\mathrm{CT}}} \, S = 0,\end{array}$$
$$\begin{array}{l}\frac{{{\mathrm{d}}T}}{{{\mathrm{d}}t}} = \left( {1 - c_S} \right)\left( {1 - c_{{\mathrm{CT}}}} \right) \times knp + k_{{\mathrm{CT}},T}{\mathrm{CT}} - k_{T,{\mathrm{CT}}}T\\ - k_TT - k_{{\mathrm{TTA}}}T^2 + 2k_{{\mathrm{SF}}}S = 0,\,{\mathrm{and}}\end{array}$$
$$\begin{array}{l}\frac{{{\mathrm{d}}S}}{{{\mathrm{d}}t}} = c_S(1 - c_{{\mathrm{CT}}}) \times knp + \frac{1}{2}k_{{\mathrm{TTA}}}T^2 - k_{{\mathrm{SF}}}S - k_{{\mathrm{rad}}}S\\ - k_{{\mathrm{nonRad}}}S - k_{S,{\mathrm{CT}}} \, S = 0,\end{array}$$

where k is the recombination rate of free charge carriers, kTTA the TTA coefficient, kT the recombination rate of triplets T to the ground state, kSF the singlet-fission rate, and krad and knonRad the rates at which singlets in rubrene recombine radiatively and non-radiatively. For simplicity, we do not distinguish between radiative and non-radiative recombination of triplets. The generation and recombination or dissociation of bound CT states at the heterojunction interface are described by kCT, kT,CT, kCT,T, kCT,rec, and kS,CT. For energetic reasons, we do not allow for generation of singlet excitons from CT states; as the energy of the triplet state in rubrene and the CT state nearly coincide, exchange between the two species was included. Note that back transfer from rubrene triplet states to CT states is penalized energetically and a small rate constant is to be expected. Often, instead of recombination rates, the lifetimes for certain processes are found in the literature, τ = k−1. The proportionality constant cS determines the fraction of singlet to triplet excitons generated from free charge carriers; under normal device operation cS = 1/4. In a similar manner, the constant cCT determines the fraction of carrier recombination generated CT states vs. the fraction of directly generated singlets and triplets in rubrene. Thus, cCT represents the branching between the bulk singlet and triplet channels, captured in the drift-diffusion model, and parallel charge recombination channels at the interface. The luminescence intensity is proportional to LkradS. Equations (2) to (5) form a system of non-linear equations and simulated luminescence data will be shown later in the manuscript.

It is illustrative to simplify the equations to look at limiting cases. Neglecting the generation of singlets from free charge carriers (cS = 0), singlet fission, and generation of CT states from triplets, we can estimate the current density dependence of the luminescence L(J). This represents the recent model by Qiao42. In this case, assuming low-triplet-state densities, Eq. (4) leads to a linear relationship between triplet state density and injected current \(T\sim \frac{{\tau _T}}{{qa_0}}J\), and via Eq. (5) to a quadratic dependence for the luminescence intensity with respect to the injected current density LSJ2. In case of a high triplet density, \(T > \left( {\tau _Tk_{{\mathrm{TTA}}}} \right)^{ - 1}\) or very long triplet lifetimes, Eq. (4) can be simplified to \(T\sim \sqrt {\frac{1}{{k_{{\mathrm{TTA}}}qa_0}}J}\). In this case, Eq. (5) yields a linear luminescence dependence LSJ. In the case of a coherent process, and neglecting other recombination types, Eq. (2) essentially must be replaced by:

$$\frac{{{\mathrm{d}}n}}{{{\mathrm{d}}t}} = \frac{{{\mathrm{d}}p}}{{{\mathrm{d}}t}} = \frac{J}{{qa_0}} - k_{{\mathrm{coh}}}n^2p^2 + k_{{\mathrm{CT}},{\mathrm{diss}}}{\mathrm{CT}} = 0,$$

which, neglecting singlet exciton generation from free charge carriers, leads to the same current dependencies for low-triplet-state densities LSJ2 and high-triplet-state density LSJ.

Shown in Fig. 8 are the experimental L(J)-characteristics, ∂log(L)/ ∂log(J) and current efficiencies as function of device current within the exponential region of the J(V)- and L(V)-data, where the device is minimally affected by either series or parallel resistance. For small currents, we observe a near unity dependence of L(J) vs. current through the device, while for medium-to-high currents, the devices with a thin BCP interlayer exhibit an exponent above 1. The exponent increases from 0 nm BCP with increasing BCP thickness, reaching its maximum at 4 nm BCP before decreasing for thicker films. In all cases, for high-current densities, the exponent decreases back to unity, as the device becomes more and more series-resistance limited. These observations are contrary to the simple model prediction of n ≈ 2 at low current (triplet density) and are in contrast to the recent results by Qiao42, who observed an exponent of 2 for small current. Our results suggest that while TTA may be observed experimentally in medium-to-high current densities, at low-current densities, the simplified model fails to describe the device behavior.

Fig. 8

Detailed luminescence characteristics. a L(J)-characteristics of rubrene/BCP and rubrene/C60 OLEDs as a function of interlayer thickness. b ∂log(L)/ ∂log(J) and (c) current efficiency for the same devices as shown in a. The beginning of the “turn-on” area is indicated. Note that at high-current densities (>100 mA/cm2), the device is series-resistance limited

In the following, we examine the L(J)-characteristics when generation of singlet excitons from free charge carriers, via minority carrier recombination, and singlet fission are not neglected. The rate constants for the triplet decay, singlet fission, and TTA in rubrene have been determined by others from time-delayed fluorescence, time-resolved photoluminescence, and transient absorption spectroscopy. Ryasnyanskiy and Ivan Biaggio measured a triplet lifetime τT in single rubrene crystals on the order of 100 μs and a recombination constant kTTA on the order of 10−14 cm3/s43. The singlet-fission rate and radiative recombination rate in solutions and films was investigated by Wen et al.44, Piland et al.45, Ma et al.46,47, Jankus et al.48, Tao et al.49, and others. In case of singlet fission, two characteristic lifetimes τSF, with the shorter lifetime being between 2  and 6 ps, and a second lifetime, delayed due to phonon scattering, on the order of 20 –50 ps were observed. Radiative recombination in solution was about 16 ns. Assuming a non-radiative lifetime of singlets on the order of the phonon-scattering time (50 ps), we can readily determine the L(J)-characteristics and the power law dependence of LJn.

Simulated L(J)-characteristics and ∂log(L)/ ∂log(J) as function of device current within the exponential region of the J(V)- and L(V)-data using the rate equations (2)–(5) are shown in Fig. 9. The fraction of singlet excitons generated from free charge carriers was varied between 0 and 1/4, corresponding to the above discussed extreme case and more realistic device operation. The rate constants involving the CT state are not known. However, their nominal dependence on BCP layer thickness can be proposed based on simple physics and existing literature. Insertion of the insulating spacer will lower the binding energy of the CT state21,22 and therefore decrease kCT,rec (energy gap law and wavefunction effects20,22,23,50), slightly decrease cCT (lower driving energy) and slightly increase kCT,diss22,23. Additionally, the spacer should decrease kS,CT due to changes in the wavefunction overlap between the molecular singlet and charge-separated CT exciton22,23,50. In Fig. 9, kS,CT and kCT,rec are assumed to obey a decaying exponential form, consistent with previous literature. The weakly varying rates are assumed constant. In Supplementary Note 5 we explore the degree at which each of the rates contribute to the simulations. Shown in Supplementary Figure 5 are simulations assuming that only kS,CT is changed by the introduction of the BCP interlayer; Supplementary Figure 6 shows simulations assuming that kCT,rec is the sole thickness-dependent rate. However, from a simulation of the short-circuit density Jsc shown in Supplementary Figure 7, it is evident that the decrease in Jsc with increasing interlayer thickness is due to the thickness dependence of kS,CT and cannot be described by the thickness dependence of kCT,rec alone.

Fig. 9

Kinetic model results. a Simulated L(J)-characteristics, (b) ∂log(L)/ ∂log(J), and (c) current efficiency of rubrene-based OLEDs. The data were calculated using Eq. (2)–(5) and literature values for kTTA = 10−14 cm3/s, τT = 100 μs, τSF = 5 ps, τnonRad = 50 ps, and τrad = 15 ns, cCT = 50%, and kT,CT = 0. Assumed values: τCT = 50 ns; τCT,T = 10 ps, τS,CT = 10 ps. The fraction of directly generated singlets, Cs, has been simulated for 0 and 25%. To simulate the introduction of a thin BCP layer, the rates kCT and kS,CT have been multiplied by an exponential term of the form exp(−d/d0), with d0 = 0.5 nm and d = 0…5 nm. All other rates are assumed to be either independent (singlet fission, TTA, …) or only weakly varying (CT dissociation, ….) with BCP layer thickness. Shown in d is a schematic representation of the possible recombination pathways. The exponentially varied rates are highlighted in red in the schematic summary of included processes shown in d

The simulated data for neglectable singlet generation of free charge carriers reproduces the above-derived dependencies for the simple model: low LSJ2 and high-triplet-state density LSJ. Once generation of singlet states from minority charge injection is included, the low-current density luminescence becomes linear with current through the device and reproduces our experimentally observed results of ∂log(L)/ ∂log(J). For low-current densities near the turn-on voltage, these singlets dominate the luminescence characteristics and singlets generated via TTA only correspond to a small fraction of the singlet population. Only for medium- and high-current densities is TTA of significant importance leading to enhanced light emission. Two critical observations arise from the kinetic model. The first is the need to have a direct singlet generation channel (bulk formation from minority carrier injection) to reproduce the linear behavior at low current. The second is the role of interface quenching in determining the luminescence from interface states. While either a decrease in kS,CT or kCT,rec can lead to increased CT states and increased TTA with increasing BCP thickness, only a decrease in kS,CT is simply consistent with both the increase in luminescence and decrease in OPV Jsc for the modified devices.

We note in passing that prior reports on rubrene/C60 LEDs have relied on MEL studies to identify higher order spin-dependent up-conversion processes as the source of the half-bandgap turn-on voltage. We find the MEL response to lack the specificity needed to assign TTA as the dominant process involved in the emission process (S1). On the other hand, our electrical analysis provides clear evidence that neither Auger or TTA processes significantly affect the device current.


We have probed the role of interface kinetics in rubrene/C60 heterojunction OLEDs by selective modification of the junction. We show that the introduction of a 2 –3 nm-thick BCP interlayer leads to a threefold increase in device luminance, while maintaining the characteristic half bandgap turn-on. The detailed device studies clearly indicate that neither Auger recombination (diode ideality of 2/3) nor TTA (non-linear L(J) behavior) are necessary (or consistent) with the behavior of the baseline, rubrene/C60 device. The success of the drift-diffusion model establishes that low-voltage EL in OLEDs can simply arise from the low built-in potential of a heterojunction interface and minority carrier recombination, as is known for inorganic LEDs, in complete agreement with the generalized Planck equation. We do find that, by tuning the interfacial rates, an interface state mediated up-conversion process can be revealed. Critical to this is the understanding that heterojunctions can act to dissociate singlets, thus modification of this parasitic channel is critical to observation of interface generated singlets. This is in contrast to studies where the CT states (exciplexes) are emissive, where the role of bulk singlet quenching is avoided.


Device fabrication

To systematically vary the electron-hole separation distance between rubrene and C60, we employed the following device structure: indium-tin-oxide (145 nm)/PEDOT:PSS:Nafion (20 nm)/rubrene (40 nm)/BCP or rubrene:C60 interlayer (0 –5 nm)/C60 (20 nm)/BCP (10 nm)/Al (90 nm). A reference rubrene-only device was also created with the structure: ITO (145 nm)/PEDOT:PSS:Nafion (20 nm)/rubrene (40 nm)/BCP (10 nm)/Al (90 nm). Devices were deposited on commercially available patterned indium tin oxide (thin film devices (Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper in order to specify the experimental procedure adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.), Rs = 15 ohms/sq). Substrates were cleaned via sonication in deionized water, acetone, and isopropanol, followed by 15 min of ultraviolet/ozone treatment. Next, a mixture of PEDOT:PSS and Nafion by mass (9:1) was spin-coated at 523 rad s−1 (5000 r.p.m.) for 1 min and annealed at 140 °C for 20 min. The rubrene (Sigma-Aldrich, >99.99), BCP (Lumtec >99 %), C60 (M.E.R. Corporation, >99.9%), and Al (R.D. Mathis, >99.99 %) were thermally evaporated using a Lesker deposition system at a base pressure of <1.2 10−4 Pa connected to an Argon purged glovebox (<5 ppm H2O, O2). The active area, as defined by the overlap of ITO and metal contacts, was 4 mm2.

Device characterization

Current–voltage, J(V), characteristics were measured using a Keithley 2636 A source meter. Absolute luminance values were measured with a Photo Research PR880 photometer at drive currents of 0.2 , 1 , 10, and 20 mA, and mapped onto a relative L(V)-curve measured by a Si-photodetector (Thorlabs SM1PD1B). MEL was measured in air on devices encapsulated inside an Ar filled glovebox placed between the poles of an electromagnet, with the magnetic field vector perpendicular to the surface normal. The magnetic field was measured using a Hall probe GaussMeter with a maximum strength of 100 mT and was applied parallel to the device surface. The EL spectra were measured with an Ocean Optics QE65PRO spectrometer. Drive currents for MEL and EL spectra were 0.75 mA. Solar cell JV measurements were measured under AM1.5 conditions.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Kotchapadist, P. et al. Synthesis, characterisation, and electroluminescence properties of N-coumarin derivatives containing peripheral triphenylamine. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 496–505 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sangchart, T. et al. Synthesis, physical and electroluminescence properties of 3,6-dipyrenylcarbazole end capped oligofluorenes. RSC Adv. 5, 26569–26579 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nie, H. et al. Modulation of aggregation-induced emission and electroluminescence of silole derivatives by a covalent bonding pattern. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 8137–8147 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Qian, L. et al. Electroluminescence from light-emitting polymer/ZnO nanoparticle heterojunctions at sub-bandgap voltages. Nano Today 5, 384–389 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pandey, A. K. & Nunzi, J. M. Rubrene/fullerene heterostructures with a half-gap electroluminescence threshold and large photovoltage. Adv. Mater. 19, 3613–3617 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pandey, A. K. & Nunzi, J.-M. Upconversion injection in rubrene/perylene-diimide-heterostructure electroluminescent diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 263508 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    He, S. J. & Lu, Z. H. Ultralow-voltage Auger-electron-stimulated organic light-emitting diodes. J. Photo. Energy 6, 12 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Xiang, C., Peng, C., Chen, Y. & So, F. Origin of sub-bandgap electroluminescence in organic light-emitting diodes. Small 11, 5439–5443 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chen, Q. et al. Determining the origin of half-bandgap-voltage electroluminescence in bifunctional rubrene/C60 devices. Sci Rep. 6, 25331 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Pandey, A. K. Highly efficient spin-conversion effect leading to energy up-converted electroluminescence in singlet fission photovoltaics. Sci Rep. 5, 7787 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Lee, T. W., Chung, Y., Kwon, O. & Park, J. J. Self-organized gradient hole injection to improve the performance of polymer electroluminescent devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 390–396 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lee, T.-W. et al. Hole-injecting conducting-polymer compositions for highly efficient and stable organic light-emitting diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 231106 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    van Reenen, S., Kouijzer, S., Janssen, R. A. J., Wienk, M. M. & Kemerink, M. Origin of work function modification by ionic and amine-based interface layers. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 1, 1400189 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kim, S. H. et al. Tuning the work function of printed polymer electrodes by introducing a fluorinated polymer to enhance the operational stability in bottom-contact organic field-effect transistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 12637–12646 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ma, S. et al. Optical–electrical–chemical engineering of PEDOT:PSS by incorporation of hydrophobic nafion for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 3902–3911 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    He, S.-J., Wang, D.-K., Jiang, N., Zhang, J. & Lu, Z.-H. Auger-electron-stimulated organic electroluminescence at ultralow voltages below the energy gap. Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 054011 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ng, A. M. C., Djurišić, A. B., Chan, W.-K. & Nunzi, J.-M. Near infrared emission in rubrene:fullerene heterojunction devices. Chem. Phys. Lett. 474, 141–145 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yoshida, H. Electron transport in bathocuproine interlayer in organic semiconductor devices. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 24459–24464 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lee, J. et al. Electron transport mechanism of bathocuproine exciton blocking layer in organic photovoltaics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 5444–5452 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    He, S.-J., Wang, D.-K., Jiang, N. & Lu, Z.-H. Nonradiative charge-transfer exciton recombination at organic heterojunctions. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 21325–21329 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Nakanotani, H., Furukawa, T., Morimoto, K. & Adachi, C. Long-range coupling of electron-hole pairs in spatially separated organic donor-acceptor layers. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501470 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Campbell, I. H. & Crone, B. K. Improving an organic photodiode by incorporating a tunnel barrier between the donor and acceptor layers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 023301 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liu, F., Crone, B. K., Paul Ruden, P. & Smith, D. L. Control of interface microscopic processes in organic bilayer structures and their effect on photovoltaic device performance. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 044516 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sze, S. M. Semiconductor Devices-Physics and Technology (Wiley, New York, 2001).

  25. 25.

    Manor, A. & Katz, E. A. Open-circuit voltage of organic photovoltaics: implications of the generalized Einstein relation for disordered semiconductors. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 97, 132–138 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Giebink, N. C., Wiederrecht, G. P., Wasielewski, M. R. & Forrest, S. R. Ideal diode equation for organic heterojunctions. I. Derivation and application. Phys. Rev. B 82, 155305 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Giebink, N. C., Lassiter, B. E., Wiederrecht, G. P., Wasielewski, M. R. & Forrest, S. R. Ideal diode equation for organic heterojunctions. II. The role of polaron pair recombination. Phys. Rev. B 82, 155306 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wetzelaer, G. A. H., Kuik, M., Lenes, M. & Blom, P. W. M. Origin of the dark-current ideality factor in polymer:fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 153506 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wetzelaer, G. A. H., Koster, L. J. A. & Blom, P. W. M. Validity of the Einstein relation in disordered organic semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 066605 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wurfel, P. The chemical potential of radiation. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 15, 3967 (1982).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Vandewal, K., Tvingstedt, K., Gadisa, A., Inganäs, O. & Manca, J. V. On the origin of the open-circuit voltage of polymer–fullerene solar cells. Nat. Mater. 8, 904 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Vandewal, K., Tvingstedt, K., Manca, J. V. & Inganäs, O. Charge-transfer states and upper limit of the open-circuit voltage in polymer:fullerene organic solar cells. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 16, 1676–1684 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yeh, H. J. J. & Smith, J. S. Fluidic self-assembly for the integration of GaAs light-emitting diodes on Si substrates. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 6, 706–708 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Takashi, E. et al. First fabrication of AlGaAs/GaAs double-heterostructure light-emitting diodes grown on GaAs(111)A substrates using only silicon dopant. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1270 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wilkinson, S. T., Jokerst, N. M. & Leavitt, R. P. Resonant-cavity-enhanced thin-film AlGaAs/GaAs/AlGaAs LED’s with metal mirrors. Appl. Opt. 34, 8298–8302 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wu, M.-C., Lu, S.-C., Lee, C.-Y. & Yang, Y.-C. Interface abruptness and LED performance of the AlGaAs/InGaP single heterostructure grown by liquid-phase epitaxy. J. Cryst. Growth 112, 803–807 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    As, D. J. et al. Electroluminescence of a cubic GaN/GaAs (001) p–n junction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 13–15 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    MacKenzie, R. C. I., Kirchartz, T., Dibb, G. F. A. & Nelson, J. Modeling nongeminate recombination in P3HT:PCBM solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 9806–9813 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    MacKenzie Roderick, C. I., Shuttle Christopher, G., Chabinyc Michael, L. & Nelson, J. Extracting microscopic device parameters from transient photocurrent measurements of P3HT:PCBM solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 662–669 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Deschler, F. et al. Increasing organic solar cell efficiency with polymer interlayers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 764–769 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    MacKenzie, R. C. I. General-Purpose Photovoltaic Device Model—gpvdm (2018).

  42. 42.

    Qiao, X., Yuan, P., Ma, D., Ahamad, T. & Alshehri, S. M. Electrical pumped energy up-conversion: a non-linear electroluminescence process mediated by triplet-triplet annihilation. Org. Electron. 46, 1–6 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ryasnyanskiy, A. & Biaggio, I. Triplet exciton dynamics in rubrene single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 84, 193203 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Wen, X., Yu, P., Yuan, C.-T., Ma, X. & Tang, J. Singlet and triplet carrier dynamics in rubrene single crystal. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 17741–17747 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Piland, G. B., Burdett, J. J., Kurunthu, D. & Bardeen, C. J. Magnetic field effects on singlet fission and fluorescence decay dynamics in amorphous rubrene. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 1224–1236 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ma, L. et al. Singlet fission in rubrene single crystal: direct observation by femtosecond pump-probe spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 8307–8312 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ma, L. et al. Fluorescence from rubrene single crystals: interplay of singlet fission and energy trapping. Phys. Rev. B 87, 201203 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Jankus, V. et al. Competition between polaron pair formation and singlet fission observed in amorphous rubrene films. Phys. Rev. B 87, 224202 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tao, S. et al. Relaxation dynamics of photoexcited excitons in rubrene single crystals using femtosecond absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 097403 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Sampat, S. et al. Tunable charge transfer dynamics at tetracene/LiF/C60 interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 1286–1290 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Han, S., Yuan, Y. & Lu, Z.-H. Highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes with metal/fullerene anode. J. Appl. Phys. 100, 074504 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


A.J.B. acknowledges support from a National Institute of Standards and Technology National Research Council fellowship. We want to thank Kurt Pernstich and Beat Ruhstaller from the Optoelectronic Research Laboratory, ZHAW School of Engineering for help full discussions and feedback. We thank Roderick MacKenzie for helpful discussions on the use of GPVDM.

Author information




A.J.B. performed device optimization and device measurement, and S.E. performed device analysis and modeling. E.G.B. provided experimental support. S.E. and A.J.B. wrote the manuscript. N.C.G. provided critical device modeling insights, L.J.R. and D.J.G. oversaw experimental design, analysis, and writing. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sebastian Engmann or David J. Gundlach.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Engmann, S., Barito, A.J., Bittle, E.G. et al. Higher order effects in organic LEDs with sub-bandgap turn-on. Nat Commun 10, 227 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing