The transcription factor STAT5 catalyzes Mannich ligation reactions yielding inhibitors of leukemic cell proliferation

Abstract

Protein-templated fragment ligations have been established as a powerful method for the assembly and detection of optimized protein ligands. Initially developed for reversible ligations, the method has been expanded to irreversible reactions enabling the formation of super-additive fragment combinations. Here, protein-induced Mannich ligations are discovered as a biocatalytic reaction furnishing inhibitors of the transcription factor STAT5. STAT5 protein catalyzes multicomponent reactions of a phosphate mimetic, formaldehyde, and 1H-tetrazoles yielding protein ligands with greatly increased binding affinity and ligand efficiency. Reactions are induced under physiological conditions selectively by native STAT5 but not by other proteins. Formation of ligation products and (auto-)inhibition of the reaction are quantified and the mechanism is investigated. Inhibitors assembled by STAT5 block specifically the phosphorylation of this protein in a cellular model of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), DNA-binding of STAT5 dimers, expression of downstream targets of the transcription factor, and the proliferation of cancer cells in mice.

Introduction

In protein-templated fragment ligations, proteins catalyze the formation of ligands with enhanced binding affinity from bound reactive fragments, thereby integrating chemical synthesis of protein ligands and modulation of protein activity in one single step1,2,3,4,5,6. The chemical space accessible by protein-templated reactions, however, is still strongly limited. Whereas most applications so far have employed reversible7,8,9,10, i.e., dynamic ligation reactions, few reactions have been used for the irreversible11,12,13,14,15 formation of stable protein ligands by protein-templated reactions, mostly employing dipolar cycloaddition reactions13,14. Recently, amide bonds, a privileged fragment linkage in bioactive molecules, have been accessed by protein-templated chemistry16. Evidently, it would be a major expansion of the chemical space populated by protein-dependent reactions, if multicomponent reactions could be employed for ligand formation—possibly exploiting alternative mechanisms9.

Here, Mannich ligations, three-component reactions of an amine, aldehyde, and N- or C-nucleophile, are investigated as protein-catalyzed reactions for discovering protein ligands. As a target, the transcription factor STAT5 (STAT = signal transducers and activators of transcription) is selected representing a central hub in the signaling of numerous cancer cell types. A small heterocyclic phosphate-mimetic binding to STAT5 with low affinity is discovered from a fragment screen and used as a starting point for fragment expansion using protein-induced multicomponent reactions. Mannich ligation products with improved affinity for STAT5 are assembled by the protein and selectivity, pH-dependence, and the biocatalytic mechanism of this protein-induced reaction are investigated. Furthermore, selectivity and functional efficacy of the inhibitors are validated for isolated proteins, in complex cell lysates, in living cells and finally in mice in order to evaluate the functional potential of protein ligands generated by protein-induced ligation.

Results

Target selection

The transcription factor STAT5 was selected as a target owing to its central role in the signaling of numerous cancer cell types17,18. STAT5 is expressed in two closely related forms, STAT5a and b, with 94% identity of the amino-acid sequence. STAT5 contains an SH2 domain, which is responsible for the binding of the protein to phosphotyrosine-containing peptide sequences of kinases, resulting in the phosphorylation at tyrosine 694/699. Phospho-STAT5 dimerizes via its SH2 domain and translocates into the nucleus19. There, p-STAT5 dimers bind to genomic promoter sequences inducing the transcription of target genes. In consequence, ligands of STAT-SH2 domains are able to suppress STAT signaling and have been recognized as potential anticancer drugs. STATs, however, have been described as difficult pharmacological targets20. Although highly potent peptide ligands have been reported for the STAT-SH2 domains21,22, these phosphopeptide mimetics usually fail to provide significant cellular activity. Several cellularly active small molecule inhibitors of STAT5 have been developed as well, however, none of these have been based on protein-induced reactions yet23,24,25.

Discovery and validation of a phosphate-mimetic fragment

Binding of fragments to the recombinantly expressed STAT5b-SH2 domain fused to maltose-binding protein (MBP) as affinity tag was recorded by measuring fluorescence polarization (FP) of the carboxyfluoresceine-labeled phosphotyrosine octapeptide 1 (KD = 55 nm) (Fig. 1a)21. A collection of 17,000 fragments and fragment combinations composed in accordance with the substructure composition of the World Drug Index (WDI)26 was screened for inhibiting the phosphopeptide-STAT5b interaction. Primary amine fragments were tested in the FP assay in the presence of electrophilic phosphotyrosine mimic 2 as described earlier for protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTP) in order to distinguish secondary site binders that enhance the inhibition of 2 from inhibitors that are not affected by 25,21. From the second group, one fragment, 4-amino-furazan-3-carboxylic acid 3 (M = 129 g mol−1, Fig. 1a) displayed a KD value of 420 µm, corresponding to the ligand efficiency of 2.1 kJ mol−1 per non-hydrogen atom, higher than that of the nanomolar phosphopeptide 1, the phosphotyrosine-mimetic 2, and the best reported STAT5 inhibitors23,24,25. Ligands with such high ligand efficiency are rather found for enzymatic binding pockets than for protein–protein interaction sites and thus fragment 3 was selected for further validation27. Binding of 3 to STAT5b-SH2 was confirmed using the thermofluor assay28,29, a thermal shift assay (TSA), as an independent biophysical assay. Binding of fragment 3 augmented the melting point of STAT5 by ΔTm of 3 °C (Supplementary Figure 1). Potential binding modes of the phosphotyrosine 2 and the fragment hit 3 were scrutinized using a homology model of STAT5b derived from the crystal structure of STAT5a (PDB:1Y1U [https://doi.org/10.2210/pdb1Y1U/pdb]) for molecular docking (Fig. 1b, c)30. The phosphotyrosine binding site in the STAT5-SH2 domain is shallow compared with the deeper binding pockets of PTP31,32, coordinating phenyl phosphate 2 by only two amino-acid residues, Arg618 and Ser622. As a result, the benzene ring of 2 is not buried in a cavity like in the case of PTPs but rather exposed to the solvent at the protein surface. Binding of fragment 3 is mediated by the Coulomb interaction between the carboxylate anion and the cation of protonated Arg618 and H-bonds involving Arg618, Ser622, and Asn642.

Fig. 1
figure1

Discovery of phosphate-mimetic fragment 3. a Fluorescently labeled phosphotyrosine peptide 1 was used in an FP assay for the screening of a fragment library furnishing 4-amino-furazan-3-carboxylic acid 3 as a phosphate-mimetic21. Phosphotyrosine-mimetic fragment 4-formyl-phenyl phosphate 2 was employed to investigate fragment hits for second site binding. b–c Molecular docking results of fragments 2 and 3 into homology model of human STAT5b-SH2 domain, generated from the published structure of STAT5a (PDB accession codes, 1Y1U [http://dx.doi.org/10.2210/pdb1Y1U/pdb])30. Hydrogen bonds with key residues in the hydrophilic binding pocket of the STAT5-SH2 domain were illustrated as red dashed lines

Fragment expansion via protein-induced Mannich ligations

First, the discovered phosphate-mimetic 3 was expanded by amidation (Fig. 2a), a reaction recently introduced to protein-templated fragment ligations16. The N-acetyl derivative 4 and all other tested amides including 5, however, were inactive in the FP assay. In order to reduce the steric demand from a carbonyl to the more flexible methylene linkage, the Mannich ligation was investigated as fragment expansion method (Fig. 2b). Fragment 3 was found to react readily with formaldehyde (FA) and various N-heterocycles in aqueous buffer at pH 5.0 at room temperature yielding Mannich ligation products, whereas no reaction was observed without protein at pH 7.4. In order to implement protein-dependent Mannich ligations, the compatibility of the reaction with the protein MBP-STAT5b-SH2 and with the FP assay was investigated. 3-(N-Morpholino)-propane sulfonic acid (MOPS, 50 mm, pH 7.4) was used as a buffer containing no primary and secondary amines that could interfere with the reaction. FP of MBP-STAT5b-SH2 (125 nm) with peptide 1 (10 nm) was recorded in the presence of increasing concentrations of FA at pH 7.4. No change of FP was observed at concentrations up to 250 µm FA, whereas at higher concentrations, FP values increased considerably (Fig. 3a). Likewise, up to 250 µm no effect of FA on the melting point of STAT5b-SH2 was recorded in the TSA, although higher FA concentrations reduced the intensity of the fluorescence signal, suggesting interference of FA with the fluorescent dye (Fig. 3b). For in situ Mannich ligation assays, fragment 3 was incubated with one hetaryl nucleophile and FA (all 250 µm) per microtiter plate-well in water resulting in pH 5.0. After 12 h incubation at room temperature, protein MBP-STAT5b (125 nm in 50 mm MOPS buffer pH 7.4) with the peptide probe 1 were added and further incubated for 15 min before FP was recorded. Several of the added heterocycles led to substantially decreased FP values—suggesting the formation of a Mannich ligation product as inhibitor of STAT5b with increased affinity. Active Mannich ligation products were re-synthesized, purified, and tested in the FP assay (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Figures 1113). Remarkably, the addition of five-membered N-heterocycles (“azoles”) to the formimine of fragment 3 led to strongly enhanced inhibition of STAT5b. The 1,2,3-triazol-1-yl product 6 as well as the benzo-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl 7 increased the affinity by a factor of > 2, pyrazol-1-yl 8 > threefold, 1,2,4-triazol-1-yl 9> ninefold and tetrazol-1-yl 10 300-fold resulting in a KI of 1.4 µm (Supplementary Figure 2). The reaction with 5-substituted tetrazoles yielded strongly active inhibitors 11–17, some even with submicromolar affinities, including 4-(5-phenyl-tetrazol-1-yl-methylamino)-furazane-3-carboxylate 11 (1.4 µm), 5-(3-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)- 12 (0.9 µm), 5-(3-fluorophenyl) 13 (0.6 µm), 5-benzyl 16 (2.9 µm), and 5-biphenyl 17 (0.8 µm). Esters of the furazane carboxylic acid (18, 19) were prepared as prodrug derivatives. 4-(Tetrazolyl-1-methylamino)-furazan-3-carboxylic acid 10 is the STAT5 inhibitor with the highest ligand efficiency of 2.23 kJ mol−1 per non-hydrogen atom. All starting azoles like tetrazole 25 were completely inactive at concentrations of 5 mm, thus the inhibitors constitute examples of super-additive fragment combinations. As a consequence, the observed protein-dependent ligation reaction did not proceed as a protein-templated reaction, that requires the binding of both reacting fragments to the protein.

Fig. 2
figure2

Expansion of fragment 3 through protein-induced reactions. a Amidation of 3 yielded compounds 4 and 5, which were inactive in the FP assay. b Mannich ligation was investigated as an alternative fragment expansion method to obtain the active compounds 6–19 containing a linker with reduced steric hindrance and better structural flexibility

Fig. 3
figure3

Assembly of STAT5 inhibitor 10 through protein-induced Mannich ligations. a FA was tolerated at up to 250 µm in the FP assay of MBP-STAT5b-SH2 (n = 3). FA did not affect the STAT5b protein stability in the TSA at ≤ 250 µm (data shown are one representative of n = 3). c Protein-induced formation of 10 in the FP assay with increasing FA concentrations (n = 3). d Protein-induced formation of 10 from fragments 3 and 1H-tetrazole 25 with increasing FA concentrations in the TSA (ΔTm = 7 °C) (data shown are one representative of n = 3). e Formation of 10 detected in the HPLC-QTOF-MS. 1: No formation of 10 from FA, fragments 3 and 25 (all 250 µm) at pH 7.4 in MOPS buffer without protein. 2: Protein-induced formation of compound 10 with protein MBP-STAT5b-SH2 (250 nm) at pH 7.4. 3–6: Inhibition of protein-induced formation of 10 by peptide 1 (3,4) or inhibitor 16 (5,6). 7,8: No formation of compound 10 in the presence of Maltose Binding Protein (1 µm) or GST-STAT3 (250 nm). 9–11: Compound 10 was not formed in the presence of phosphatases, SHP2 (250 nm) and PTP1B (250 nm) nor in the presence of mutant STAT5b-N642A at pH 7.4 in MOPS buffer. 12: Formation of compound 10 at pH 5.0 without protein. Data shown are one representative example of n = 3. f 3D-binding model of the STAT5b:10 complex. Hydrogen bonds are illustrated as red dashed lines. g, Mechanism of the protein-induced formation of 10 from 3 with FA and 25 (R = H). (i) Binding of 3 via Arg618, Ser622, and Asn642, activation of FA with Asn642. (ii) Activation of the forminium cation of 3, coordination of the incoming tetrazolium anion of 25 by Asn642 leads to formation of Mannich ligation product 10 (iii). Error bars denote mean ± S.D

Mechanistic analysis of the protein-induced reactions

Protein-catalyzed reactions of fragment 3 with FA and 1H-tetrazole 25 were investigated by using the binding assays (FP, TSA), and high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) analysis. Incubation of fragments 3 and 25 (250 µm each) with MBP-STAT5b-SH2 (250 nm) with increasing concentrations of FA at pH 7.4 led to decreased FP values, suggesting the formation of an inhibitor (Fig. 3c). The protein-induced formation of a STAT5 inhibitor was confirmed in the TSA: Incubation of fragments 3 and 25 with increasing concentrations of FA and the protein resulted in a shift of the protein's melting point ΔTm by 7 °C (Fig. 3d). High-resolution HPLC-QTOF-MS analysis was employed to quantify Mannich ligation product 10 formed with or without protein present (Fig. 3e). At pH 7.4, absolutely no inhibitor was formed from 3, 25, and FA, if MBP-STAT5-SH2 protein was not present (trace 1). With 250 nm MBP-STAT5-SH2 in the buffer at pH 7.4, 432 nm of 10 were formed over 24 h (average of three independent experiments). The protein-dependent reaction was saturated after 24 h, no significant changes in product concentration were observed between 24 and 48 h reaction time—suggesting product inhibition of the ligation reaction. Addition of phosphopeptide 1 or inhibitor 16 to the protein-induced reaction suppressed the formation of 10 completely or partly in a concentration-dependent manner (traces 3–6). If instead of the MBP-STAT5-SH2 protein only the protein tag MBP (1 µm) or the catalytic domains of tyrosine phosphatases PTP1B or SHP2 (250 nm) were added, no product was formed at all (traces 7,9,10). In contrast, incubation of reagents 3, 25, and FA at pH 5.0 led with or without protein to the formation of 7 µm of inhibitor 10 in a protein-independent background reaction (trace 12). Similar data were obtained for the protein-dependent reaction of fragments 3, FA, and benzyl-tetrazole 26 although traces of a background reaction were observed in this case (Supplementary Figure 3). In contrast, no protein-dependent reaction was observed when replacing the 1H-tetrazoles by 1,2,4-triazole (Supplementary Figure 3).

Molecular docking suggested that the large increase in binding affinity of compound 10 was contributed by expansion of the binding interaction into the adjacent amphiphilic pocket containing residues Trp641, Leu643, and Met639 via hydrophobic contacts. The H-bond, between the 4-amino group of 10 and the carbonyl of Asn642 was retained and possibly enforced by the higher polarity of the NH-bond in 10 (Fig. 3f). An additional H-bond was proposed by BINding ANALyzer (BINANA) between the tetrazole ring and the amide-NH2 of Asn642 and strengthened the binding of compound 10 in the binding pocket18,23,33,34. In order to challenge the postulated importance of Asn642 for the reactivity of fragment 3 with STAT5b-SH2, the fragment ligation of 3, FA, and 1H-tetrazole at pH 7.4 was investigated with GST-STAT3, a protein without Asn in the otherwise similar phosphotyrosine recognition site (Fig. 3, trace 8). With STAT3 instead of STAT5b absolutely no fragment ligation product was formed. In addition, the mutant MBP-STAT5b-SH2 N642A was generated by site-directed mutagenesis. The mutant protein displayed strongly reduced binding affinity to peptide 1 with KD of ca. 5 µm (instead of 55 nm for the wildtype) (Supplementary Figure 2g). Binding of the peptide was inhibited by compound 10 with an IC50 of 30 µm (instead of 1.5 µm for the wildtype) (Supplementary Figure 2h). Accordingly, the conditions of the fragment ligation reaction yielded no product with the mutant protein as well. Plausibly, the side chain carbonyl group of Asn642 binds to the amino group of compound 3 via accepting an H-bond (Fig. 3g). As a result, the amide-NH2 of Asn642 is free to coordinate and activate the incoming FA as an H-bond donor, leading to the formation of the formiminium derivative of 3, which is again stabilized by its H-bond to the Asn-carbonyl. Next, the amide-NH2 could coordinate the incoming 1H-tetrazolium ion which reacts to the observed ligation product 10.

Specificity of STAT5 inhibitors

Compound 10 was tested with closely related STAT3 and the catalytic domain of protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 (PTPN10) and at concentrations up to 1 mm no binding or inhibition was observed (Supplementary Figure 4). Next, phosphorylated STAT-dimers were extracted from nuclei of BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells and binding of STAT1, 3, 5a, and 5b to DNA was detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) specific for the respective protein-DNA-complexes. Compounds 3, 10, and 16 inhibited formation of the DNA complex of STAT5a and STAT5b, but not of STAT1 and STAT3 (Fig. 4b). Likewise, inhibition of the STAT5:DNA complex by compound 10 was detected in the electro mobility shift assay (EMSA) (Fig. 4c). The specificity of compound 10 was further investigated in complex cell lysates using cellular thermal shift assays (CETSA) (Fig. 4d)35. Compound 10 bound to isolated MBP-STAT5b-SH2 shifting the melting temperature (Tm) by 9 °C (Fig. 4a). BaF3/FLT3-ITD cell lysates were incubated with 10 and exposed to a temperature gradient from 43–73 °C36. Supernatants were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting was performed with STAT5a/b antibodies. Inhibitor 10 shifted the melting temperatures of STAT5a/b by 5 and 8 °C, respectively, indicating the thermal stabilization of STAT5 proteins through ligand binding in cell lysates (Fig. 4d, e).

Fig. 4
figure4

Inhibitor 10 blocks STAT5 dimerization, DNA-binding, and is active in CETSA and photocrosslinking assays in cellular lysates. a 10 stabilizes MBP-STAT5b-SH2 shifting the melting temperature (ΔTm) by 9 °C in the TSA (data shown are one representative example of n = 3). b 10 and 16 inhibit formation of trimeric (STAT5b)2-DNA complexes in an ELISA (n = 3). c (i) 10 inhibits binding of STAT5 dimers, isolated from nuclear extracts of BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells, to its target DNA in the electro mobility shift assay (EMSA) and (ii) shows selectivity for disrupting STAT5a,b-DNA complexes in the TransAM® STAT family ELISA (n = 3). d–e 10 binds to STAT5a and STAT5b in complex cellular lysates as demonstrated by cellular TSA (CETSA), resulting in shifted melting curves at 50 µm compared with vehicle (DMSO). Relative STAT5a and STAT5b band intensities were plotted against corresponding incubation temperatures and fitted to Boltzmann sigmoidal curve. The blue triangle represents DMSO and red circle represents compound 10 (n = 3). f Binding of 10 to STAT5 in BaF3/FLT3-ITD cell lysate was determined by photo-crosslinking (n = 3). (i) The dual-labeled (carboxyfluorescein and biotin) peptide probe 27 binds to STAT5 with submicromolar affinity and photocrosslinked (ii) with target proteins by activating the 4-phosphoncarbonyl residue that acts as a photoactive phosphotyrosine-mimetic. (iii) Cross-linked proteins can be isolated by biotin pull-down using Neutravidine beads. (iv) Displacement of 27 (100 µm) by compound 10 (50 µm) in BaF3/FLT3-ITD cell lysates (1 mg ml−1) resulted in significantly reduced photo-crosslinking of 27 and STAT5 as demonstrated in the western blotting using STAT5 antibodies (right lane), whereas other biotinylated proteins were not reduced (middle lane). For an uncropped image of c, d, e, f see Supplementary Figure 10. Error bars denote mean ± S.D. and p values are considered as follows: *p value < 0.05; **p value < 0.01; and ***p value < 0.001. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA or the two-tailed Student’s t tests where appropriate

The specific interaction of inhibitor 10 with STAT5 was further challenged by interfering with the photo-crosslinking of STAT5b-SH2 and the dual-labeled STAT5-binding peptide 5-CF-K(biotin)GpcFLSLPPW-NH2 27 (CF = carboxyfluorescein, pcF = phosphono-carboxy-phenylalanine)21. Peptide 27 was demonstrated to photo-crosslink STAT5b after being exposed to UV irradiation at 365 nm and 10 suppressed the photo-crosslinking in a concentration-dependent manner (Supplementary Figure 4). When peptide 27 was incubated with BaF3/FLT3-ITD cell lysate, irradiated for 15 min at 4 °C and subjected to pull-down using avidin beads, compound 10 repressed STAT5-crosslinking by displacing peptide 27 competitively in the complex lysate (Fig. 4f).

Validation of STAT5 inhibitors in living cells and animals

The biological activity of inhibitors was studied in a cellular disease model using the murine pro-B-cell line BaF3 stably transfected with the internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation of the human FLT3 receptor (FLT3-ITD)37. In these cells, STAT5 is constitutively phosphorylated without cytokine activation. As the FLT3-ITD mutation is found in 35% of AML patients, it can be considered as a relevant model for this disease38.

At first, STAT5 phosphorylation at tyrosine residues (Tyr694/Tyr699) was investigated. 5-Aryl-substituted derivatives like 11–13 could not be tested in cells as they precipitated in buffer. Compounds 10, 16, and 18 were dissolved in dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) (20 mm) and added to BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells. After 6 h cells were harvested to determine the level of STAT5 phosphorylation using phosphotyrosine-specific antibodies. The strongest inhibition was observed for compound 16 with > 50% reduction of STAT5 phosphorylation at 25 µm (Fig. 5a). In contrast, the phosphorylation of STAT5 was inhibited by 10 only with an IC50 value of > 100 µm. We suspected that the low cellular activity of 10 was hampered by low cellular uptake owing to its high polarity. This suspicion was substantiated by the higher activity of ester derivative 18, which might act as prodrug being activated by intracellular esterases24,33,39. A time course experiment indeed showed that compound 18 reduced STAT5 phosphorylation steadily over 10 h (Supplementary Figure 5). Both compounds 16 and 18 had no effect on the overall expression of endogenous STAT5 (Supplementary Figure 5).

Fig. 5
figure5

Activity, target occupancy, and functional effects of STAT5 inhibitor 16 tested in STAT5-dependent cells. a 16 blocks tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5 in a dose-dependent manner as shown by western blot analysis in BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells after 6 h treatment. Relative STAT5 phosphorylation levels were plotted as after quantification using Image J software. Immunoblotting for beta-actin was used as a control for uniform protein loading (n = 3). b Compound 16 inhibits transcriptional activity of STAT5 in BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells as measured by normalized Fluc/Rluc ratio in dual luciferase reporter assay (n = 3). c Expression of downstream targets of STAT5 Pim1,BcL-xL and Cis was reduced after 18 h of treatment with compound 16. Gene expression was quantified by quantitative PCR (n = 3). d Compound 16 inhibits the proliferation of BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells after 48 h as determined by the Alamar Blue assay (n = 3). e, i BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells were treated with compound 16 after which annexin-V/propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry were performed (gating strategy as in Supplementary Figure 11a, data shown are one representative of n = 3); (ii) Intracellular levels of phosphorylated STAT5 were evaluated by flow cytometry after 6 h exposure of cells to compound 16 for 50 µm (gating strategy as in Supplementary Figure 11b, data shown are one representative of n = 3). f–g, In-cell occupancy of STAT5a and STAT5b by compound 16 in BaF3/FLT3-ITD, determined using ITDRF. ITDRF of compound 16 on STAT5a and STAT5b denaturization at 60 °C for 3 min based on raw data from western blotting chemiluminescence readings (n = 3). CETSA, cellular thermal shift assay; ITDRF, isothermal dose–response fingerprint; OC50, the concentration at which 50% of the STAT5 in the cell was occupied by inhibitor. For an uncropped image of panels f and g see Supplementary Figure 10. Error bars denote mean ± S.D. and p values are considered as follows: **p value < 0.01; and ***p value < 0.001. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA or the two-tailed Student’s t tests where appropriate

Next, inhibition of gene transcription by 16 was determined. BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells transfected with a dual firefly/Renilla luciferase system were treated with 16 for 6 h and the activity of the STAT5-transcribed luciferase reporter gene was found to reduce significantly in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5b). Inhibition of the endogenous transcription of STAT5 target genes by 16 and 18 was studied, too. BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells were treated with inhibitors for 6 h, mRNA was harvested and analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. Transcription and protein expression of three target genes of STAT5, Pim1 kinase, Bcl-xl, and Cis, which play essential roles in cell cycle progression and survival, was found to be strongly reduced (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Figure 5).

The effect of STAT5 inhibitors 10, 16, and 18 on the proliferation of cancer cells carrying the common FLT3-ITD mutation after 48 h was quantified by the Alamar Blue assay (Fig. 5d). All three compounds showed a clear dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation. For comparison, the compounds were tested with four non-STAT5-dependent cell lines (HT-29, COS-7, HeLa and MDA-MB-231) and here cytotoxicity was negligible at up to 500 µm (Supplementary Figure 6). The compounds also showed no effects on STAT3 phosphorylation and on endogenous STAT3 expression (Supplementary Figures 5 and 6)25. The percentage of necrotic vs. apoptotic cells death after treatment with 16 was studied by flow cytometry staining with a fluorescent annexin-V conjugate and with propidium iodide (PI), likewise reduced STAT5 phosphorylation was studied using a fluorophor-conjugated anti-pSTAT5 antibody (PE-Cy7 Mouse anti-STAT5, pY694, Fig. 5e).

Target specificity of compound 16 to STAT5 in living cells was evaluated using isothermal dose–response fingerprints (ITDRF)40, a variation of CETSA experiments. BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells were treated with 16 at concentrations between 0 and 100 µm for 6 h. All samples were heated for 3 min to 60 °C, the denaturation temperature based on the Tm curves in the CETSA experiment (Fig. 4d, e), lyzed and immunoblotted with STAT5a/b antibodies. The amount of STAT5 protein found in the blot was plotted against logarithmic concentration of the inhibitor, indicating the in-cell occupancy (OC50) of STAT5a/b of 63 and 28 µm, respectively, correlating well with the inhibition of target phosphorylation and cell proliferation (Fig. 5f, g).

Fig. 6
figure6

Synergy of inhibitor 16 and kinase inhibitor midostaurin (PKC412). Activity tested in a murine cancer model. a MV-411 cells were treated with PKC412 (10 nm) or compound 16 (10 µm) alone or in combination and incubated for 24 h followed by annexin-V/ propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Apoptosis was quantitated for three independent experiments (n = 3) and error bars denote mean ± S.D. b Cell viability assays were carried out by treating MV-411 cells with compound 16 (10 µm) and PKC412 (10 nm) alone or in combination. The number of viable cells was distinguished using an ATP-dependent bioluminescence assay (CellTiter-Glo, Promega) (n = 3, error bars denote mean ± S.D.). c Combination index (CI) plot showing the synergistic effect of compound 16 and PKC412 in MV-411 cells. CI values were generated using CalcuSyn software (Conservion, Ferguson, MO) and plotted as a function of fractional growth inhibition (n = 3) (Fa) where Fa = (A570 control−A570 treated)/A570control. CI values of < 1, = 1, and > 1 indicate synergism, additivity, and antagonism, respectively. Error bars denote mean ± S.D. d Relative STAT5 phosphorylation levels were plotted based on the raw data from western blotting chemiluminescence readings to study the synergistic effect of both compounds on STAT5 phosphorylation reduction. MV-411 cells were treated with compound 16 or PKC412 alone or in combination and incubated for 6 h (n = 3, error bars denote mean ± S.D.). e The corresponding body weight changes in non-xenografted mice during compound 16 treatments (n = 6, error bars denote mean ± S.D.). f Compound 16 significantly inhibits tumor growth in BaF3/FLT3-ITD xenograft tumor model. Time course of tumor growth suppressed by compound 16 (200 mg kg−1) in mice bearing BaF3/FLT3-ITD tumor (n = 6, error bars denote mean ± S.D.)

Moreover, the synergistic effects of STAT5 inhibitor 16 with the staurosporine-derived FLT3-inhibitor PKC412 were investigated41,42. The receptor tyrosine kinase FLT3 and especially the constitutively activated mutant FLT3-ITD have been described to be responsible for the phosphorylation and, thereby, overactivation of STAT5. Treatment of AML patients bearing the FLT3 mutation with PKC412 alone exhibited a therapeutic effect, however, often led to major drawbacks such as incomplete target inhibition and short-lived responses. Therefore, combination treatment of leukemic cells with two inhibitors, one targeting FLT3 and the other STAT5, can be a promising strategy to enhance inhibition of STAT5 signaling, overcome or prevent resistance toward kinase inhibitors and improve treatment efficacy38,41. MV-411 leukemic cells were treated with concentrations of inhibitors resulting in 20% of cell apoptosis individually as well as in combination. The combination of 16 and PKC412 resulted in a threefold increase in annexin-V-staining corresponding to 60% apoptotic cells, in decreased reporter gene expression, and in reduced STAT5 phosphorylation (Fig. 6a–d). Both compounds impaired synergistically the cell proliferation after 48 h of treatment as demonstrated by a Chou–Talalay combination index (CI) plot (Fig. 6c)43. For example, the IC50 of compound 16 was reduced threefold in the presence of 1.25 nm (IC10) of PKC412.

Finally, the inhibitory effect of 16 was examined in a murine xenograft model of leukemia. Treatment of nude mice with 16 was tolerated well and had no significant effect on mice body weight (Fig. 6e). Nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells. The control group displayed rapid tumor growth, while tumor growth in the group treated s.c. with compound 16 (200 mg kg−1) was delayed and became first apparent on day 11 (Fig. 6f). Tumor growth in the treated group was reduced to 6% T/C on day 11 and 28% on day 14 proving that compound 16 exhibited anti-tumor efficacy in vivo.

Discussion

In this contribution, protein-induced Mannich ligations have been discovered and characterized as protein-catalyzed, non-enzymatic reactions following a fundamental mechanism for the formation and identification of protein ligands. The reactions delivered potent, specific, and cellularly active inhibitors of the transcription factor STAT5. The starting point, phosphate-mimetic fragment 3 was activated by the protein STAT5b-SH2 enabling three-component reactions with FA and various 1H-tetrazoles in aqueous physiological buffer yielding low-micromolar and submicromolar inhibitors of the protein–protein interaction site. The progress of the observed Mannich ligations depended on the pH of the solution and on the presence of the protein. At pH 7.4, the reaction occurred only in the presence of the protein, whereas at pH 5.0 it was switched to an entirely protein-independent reaction. Protein-induced reactions were analyzed using FP and TS assays; products formed were quantified by HPLC-MS and protein-induced product was saturated at 432 nm (average of three independent experiments) with 250 nm protein. Product saturation is typical for protein-dependent reactions and resulted from auto-inhibition by the products formed. The reaction was also inhibited competitively by alternative ligands of the SH2 domain confirming that the phosphotyrosine recognition site constituted the catalytic center.

Remarkably, all initial 1H-tetrazole fragments like compound 25 did not bind to the STAT5b-SH2 protein at all (KI > 10 mm), whereas, for example, the ligation product of 3, FA, and 25, namely 4-(1H-tetrazol-1-yl)-methylamino-furazan-3-carboxylate 10, displayed super-additive binding with an affinity of 1.4 µm and the enhanced ligand efficiency of 2.23 kJ mol−1 per non-hydrogen atom. This findings excluded the mechanism of a protein-templated reaction, which requires the binding of both fragments to the protein template in order to initiate the reaction. Instead, an alternative mechanism of protein-dependent reactions was observed, in which only one of the starting molecules, here fragment 3, binds to the protein. Molecular modeling suggested that H-bonding by the side chain amide of Asn642 induced the reaction of fragment 3 with FA, that of the intermediary formiminium ion with tetrazoles, and the high selectivity of the reactions21. This hypothesis was challenged by investigating the protein-dependent reaction of 3, FA, and 1H-tetrazole with the phosphotyrosine binding site of STAT3-SH2, which is structurally closely related containing Arg618 and Ser622 but lacks Asn642. Indeed STAT3-SH2 did not catalyze the Mannich ligation reaction and no product was identified in HPLC-MS. In agreement with this result, STAT3, STAT1, and the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2, all lacking the Asn-residue in the phosphotyrosine recognition sites, did not bind the STAT5 inhibitors 10 and 16, although cross-reactivity has been reported for other STAT-inhibitors44,45. The importance of Asn642 was further confirmed by the mutant STAT5b-N642A, which was generated by site-directed mutagenesis. The mutant protein displayed strongly reduced binding affinity to peptide 1 and to inhibitor 10 and did not catalyze a Mannich ligation reaction as shown for the wildtype protein. In conclusion, the observed protein-dependent reaction constitutes indeed a protein-induced reaction in which the protein catalytically activates the bound fragment 3 by specific binding interactions without templating the reacting fragments priorly.

Specificity of the formed inhibitors for STAT5 was also confirmed in complex cellular systems. Binding of inhibitors 10 and 16 to STAT5a,b in cell lysates was determined by CETSA. The high selectivity of the protein-ligand interaction was demonstrated by the fact that inhibitor 10 in cell lysates suppressed photo-crosslinking of the biotinylated STAT5 ligand 27 with STAT5 but not with other proteins. In addition, the selectivity of compound 16 in living cells was proven by ITDRF. It was found that 50% of the target proteins STAT5a and b were occupied in living cells with 16 at concentrations (OC50 values) being in the same range as the IC50 values observed for the inhibition of STAT5 phosphorylation and cell proliferation, indicating that the interaction of 16 with the target STAT5 alone was sufficient to generate and explain the observed biological effects. Likewise, compound 16 was able to block STAT5 transcription and to inhibit cellular proliferation of cancer cells in a mouse model. Another proof for the cellular selectivity of 16 for STAT5 was that the proliferation of all tested cell lines which proliferate independently from STAT5 activation was not inhibited by 16 and these cells showed no sign of toxicity.

Our work demonstrates the growing power of protein-dependent fragment ligations in fragment-based drug discovery. Protein-induced multicomponent reactions such as Mannich ligations enlarge the chemical diversity of protein ligands accessible by the method considerably. Protein-induced fragment ligations seem to be especially advantageous for the formation of potent and specific ligands as molecular interactions responsible for binding catalyze the ligation reaction. Considering the omnipresence of FA in living cells46,47 and the versatility of reactions this and other aldehydes can undergo, the mechanism should find broad application on numerous protein targets and many bioactive fragments should be expandable to chemically diverse and potent protein ligands, possibly even in living cells. Thus, protein-induced reactions seem to constitute an additional, non-enzymatic mechanism exerted by proteins enabling the molecular evolution of ligands and modulating protein activities and functions.

Methods

General methods

Protocols and reaction schemes for the chemical synthesis of compounds 1–27 as well as other methodological information are reported in the Supplementary Methods. Identity and purity ( > 95%) of all compounds were determined by chromatography (silica or RP-18 HPLC), by fully assigned 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra, by high-resolution mass spectra and by elemental analysis.

Antibodies and reagents

The following antibodies were used for immunoblotting: anti-STAT5a (C-6, cat. sc271542, 1 µg ml−1) and STAT5b (G-2, cat. sc-1656, 1 µg ml−1), anti-STAT3 (C-20, cat. sc-482, 1 µg ml−1), anti-phospho-STAT3 (Tyr 705) (cat. sc-7993, 1 µg ml−1), anti-STAT5 (C-17, cat. sc-835, 1 µg ml−1), and anti-Bcl-xL (H-5, cat. sc-8392, 1 µg ml−1) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies recognizing Cyclin D1 (92G2, cat. 2978 s, 2 µg ml−1), FLT3 (8F2, cat. 3462 s, 1 µg ml−1), phospho-STAT5 (Tyr694) (cat. 9351, 1 µg ml−1), phospho-FLT3 Tyr591 (cat. 3461 s, 1 µg ml−1) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Anti-Pim1 (M08, clone 1C10, cat. H00005292-M08, 2 µg ml−1) was purchased from Abnova (Taiwan), anti-Beta-actin (cat. ab8227, 0.5 µg ml−1) was from Abcam (Cambridge, MA), anti Biotin−Peroxidase antibody (cat. A4541, 1 µg ml−1) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany) and anti-CIS (cat. PA5–27128, 1 µg ml−1) was from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Braunschweig, Germany). For phospho flow cytometry experiments, PE-Cy™7 mouse anti-Stat5 (pY694) (clone 47, cat. 560117, 20 µl each test) and anti-mouse IgG1 monoclonal antibody (clone A85-1, cat. 550083, 0.2 µg ml−1) were from BD Biosciences. Antibodies were validated by the manufacturers. Recombinant mouse IL3 protein (cat. PMC0034, 1 ng ml−1) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific and midostaurin hydrate (PKC412, cat. M1323) was from Sigma-Aldrich. Both TransAM STAT family kit (cat. 42296) and nuclear extraction kit (cat. 40010) were from Active Motif (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Cell lines and cell culture

MV-411 (CRL-9591) and K562 (CCL-243) cells were from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), (LGC Standards GmbH, Wesel, Germany). BaF3 and BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells were kind gifts from professor Carol Stocking (University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf). All suspension cells were cultured in Rosewell Park Memorial Institute media supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) without or without recombinant mouse IL3 (1 ng ml−1). COS-7 (CRL-1651), HeLa (CCL-2), MDA-MB-231 (HTB-26), and HT-29 (HTB-38) were from and certified by ATCC and cultured in DMEM media supplemented with 10% FCS. Cell culture media and FCS were purchased from Biozol (Biozol, Eching, Germany). Cells were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 atmosphere. All cell lines were tested and were mycoplasma-free using MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza).

Detection of protein-induced ligand formation via FP assay

All FP assays were conducted in a total volume of 20 µl in 50 mm of MOPS buffer (pH 7.4) at room temperature. For investigating the tolerance of the assay for FA, serial dilutions of FA (concentration range: 0–1 mm) were prepared and incubated with 250 nm of MBP-STAT5b in buffer. For the protein-induced reaction, 250 nm of MBP-STAT5b protein were added to a mixture of 250 µm of 3 and one heteraryl nucleophile per microtiter plate well with increasing concentration of FA up to the concentration of 250 µm. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 12 h with mild shaking. Plates were centrifuged and 10 nm of FP probe 1 were added and incubated for 1 h with mild shaking before measurement with Safire2 well plate reader (Tecan, Crailsheim, Germany).

Detection of protein-induced ligand formation via TSA

Here we introduced the possibility of using TSA48 assay to determine protein-induced ligand formation. The compatibility of FA with the TSA was investigated using MBP-STAT5b-SH2 protein (500 nm) mixed with increasing concentrations of FA up to the concentration of 250 µm and incubated at room temperature with mild shaking in a sealed 384 PCR plate. To determine the formation of ligand via a protein-induced reaction, MBP-STAT5b-SH2 protein 500 nm was added to 250 µm (IC20) 4-amino-furazane-3-carboxylic acid 3, equimolar amount (250 µm) of one heteraryl nucleophile per PCR plate well with increasing concentration of FA up to the concentration of 250 µM. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 12 h with mild shaking at room temperature, respectively. After 12 h, the plates were centrifuged and 1 µl of 400X Sypro Orange solution (Thermo Scientific) was added, resulting in a total assay volume of 20 µl, with a final protein concentration of 475 nm. The PCR plates were again sealed with optical seal, shaken for 15 min, and centrifuged. Thermal scanning (20–95 °C at 1 °C min−1) was performed using a real-time PCR setup (LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and fluorescence intensity was measured after every 0.3 s. Curve fitting, melting temperature calculation, and report generation on the raw data were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software.

Detection of protein-induced ligand formation by LC/MS

Extracted ion chromatography was performed with reaction mixtures containing 250 nm of MBP-STAT5b protein, 250 µm (IC20) 4-amino-furazane-3-carboxylic acid 3, equimolar amount (250 µm) of one heteraryl nucleophile and FA with a total volume of 100 µl. The reaction mixtures were vortexed to mix thoroughly and incubated overnight at room temperature and was analyzed using a HPLC/QTOF-MS instrument by Agilent, consisting of an Infinity 1290 UHPLC coupled to a 6550 iFunnel QTOF. After 12 h each sample was analyzed in triplicate by injecting (10 μl) into the LC/MS instrument and the ligation products were identified by their molecular weights and by comparison of the retention times of synthetic reference. Calibration curves for hit compounds 10 and 16 are given in Supplementary Figure 19.

Determination of STAT-DNA binding using ELISA

Binding of STAT1, STAT3, STAT5a, and b to DNA was determined from nuclear protein extracts using the TransAM STAT family kit from Active Motif (Carlsbad, CA). Nuclear protein extract was prepared by resuspending nuclear pellet by pipetting up and down in 50 µl of complete lysis buffer (Active Motif, Carlsbad,CA) in the presence of 2.5 µl of detergent to ease solubilization of membrane associated nuclear proteins. Suspension was incubated on ice for 30 min on a rocking platform at 150 rpm followed by 30 s vortex at highest setting. Nuclear extract fraction was collected through centrifugation at 14,000×g and protein concentration was determined using Bradford assay. Nuclear extract (2 µl of a 1 µg µl−1 solution) containing activated, dimeric STAT was dissolved in a mixture of a solution of the inhibitor 3, 10, or 16 in complete lysis buffer (20 μl, 1% (v/v) DMSO) and complete binding buffer (30 μl) in microtiter wells coated with DNA of the respective STAT consensus sequence. After incubation at room temperature for 1 h, the wells were washed three times with the wash buffer and incubated with respective STAT antibodies for 1 h. After washing as before, wells were incubated with a secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase for 1 h at room temperature. Wells were washed again for three times, incubated with 100 μl of developing solution, quenched with 100 μl of the stop solution, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using Safire2 well plate reader (Tecan, Crailsheim, Germany).

EMSA

Gel shift assay was conducted using a double-stranded, biotin-labeled oligonucleotide probe containing the consensus binding site for STAT5 (sense strand, 5′-AGATTTCTAGGAATTCAATCC-3′), using the Gelshift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Active Motif). In brief, protein–DNA complexes were resolved on a nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel, transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane, and cross-linked to the membrane using the UV-light cross-linker. After blocking, the membrane was incubated with blocking buffer containing streptavidin conjugated to HRP. After washing, protein–DNA complexes were detected using a chemiluminescent substrate (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA)40,49.

Photo-crosslinking and enrichment of biotinylated proteins

Peptide probe 27 (100 µm) was incubated with BaF3/FLT3-ITD whole cell lysates (1 ml of 1 mg ml−1) in the binding buffer (50 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 200 mm NaCl, 2 mm MgCl2, 0.1% Tween-20, 20% glycerol, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, Roche Complete ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-free protease inhibitor cocktail) for 1 h at 4 °C. The samples were then irradiated at 365 nm using a UV transilluminator for 15 min at 4 °C. For competitive displacement studies, compound 10 (50 µm) was added together with peptide probe 27 and incubated with whole cell lysates for 1 h at 4 °C prior to UV photo-crosslinking for 15 min at 4 °C. The mixture was then incubated with Neutravidin agarose resin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 h at room temperature. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), the enriched proteins were eluted by boiling the beads in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer.

Statistical analysis

Statistical calculations were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.01 software and reported as mean ± S.D. Experiments were performed in triplicates and/or repeated at least three times unless indicated otherwise. Two-tailed Student’s t tests and one-way analysis of variance were used to identify statistically significant data. p values are considered as follows: *p value < 0.05; **p value < 0.01; and ***p value < 0.001 and statistical significance was attributed to p values < 0.05. Synergy in cell viability assays was determined by plotting isobolograms and calculating the CI using CalcuSyn software (Calcusyn software, Biosoft, San Diego, CA, USA) (Conservion, Ferguson, MO) using the Chou–Talalay method43 to ascertain if the effects of drug combinations were synergistic (CI < 1), additive (CI = 1), or antagonistic (CI > 1).

Animal experiments

NSG mice (NOD/Shi-scid/IL-2Rγnull) obtained from The Jackson Laboratory aged 6 weeks with an average body weight of 22 g. All animal experiments have been approved by the Tierversuchskommission (commission for animal experiments) of the Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales (LaGeSo, the state office for health and social affairs), which is the responsible ethics committee for all animal experiments conducted in the state of Berlin. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the United Kingdom coordinating committee on cancer research regulations for the welfare of animals and with German Animal Protection Law and were reviewed by the animal protection officer (Tierschutzbeauftragter) at Experimental Pharmacology & Oncology (EPO) Berlin-Buch GmbH. BaF3/FLT3-ITD cells were injected into mice subcutanously (106 cells per mouse). Inoculated and control mice (six in each group) were treated for 16 d once daily s.c. with either the vehicle (10% (v/v) DMSO/0.25% Tween 80) or compound 16 (200 mg kg−1) dissolved in vehicle, starting shortly after tumor cell inoculation. Former studies had shown that this concentration of test compound is well tolerated by the mice. Tumor volumes and body weights were recorded daily (n = 6, error bars denote mean ± S.D.).

Reporting Summary

Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability statement

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. A reporting summary for this Article is available as a Supplementary Information file. The source data underlying Figs. 3b, 3d, 3f, 4a, 6e, f, and Supplementary Figures 2g–i have been submitted to FigShare: https://figshare.com/s/4a8e28d4337b5509c6ed. All other relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Jaegle, M. et al. Protein-templated fragment ligations - from molecular recognition to drug discovery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 7358–7378 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Herrmann, A. Dynamic combinatorial/covalent chemistry: a tool to read, generate and modulate the bioactivity of compounds and compound mixtures. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 1899–1933 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mondal, M. & Hirsch, A. K. H. Dynamic combinatorial chemistry: a tool to facilitate the identification of inhibitors for protein targets. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2455–2488 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ramström, O. & Lehn, J.-M. Drug discovery by dynamic combinatorial libraries. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 1, 26–36 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Schmidt, M. F., Groves, M. R. & Rademann, J. Dynamic substrate enhancement for the identification of specific, second-site-binding fragments targeting a set of protein tyrosine phosphatases. Chembiochem 12, 2640–2646 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jaegle, M., Nawrotzky, E., Wong, E. L., Arkona, C. & Rademann, J. in Fragment-based Drug Discovery Lessons and Outlook (eds Erlanson, D. A. & Jahnke, W.) 293–326 (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2016).

  7. 7.

    Schmidt, M. F. & Rademann, J. Dynamic template-assisted strategies in fragment-based drug discovery. Trends Biotechnol. 27, 512–521 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Schmidt, M. F. et al. Sensitized detection of inhibitory fragments and iterative development of non-peptidic protease inhibitors by dynamic ligation screening. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 3275–3278 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Burda, E. & Rademann, J. Catalytic activation of pre-substrates via dynamic fragment assembly on protein templates. Nat. Commun. 5, 5170 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Schmidt, M. F., El-Dahshan, A., Keller, S. & Rademann, J. Selective identification of cooperatively binding fragments in a high-throughput ligation assay enables development of a picomolar caspase-3 inhibitor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6346–6349 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Erlanson, D. A. et al. Site-directed ligand discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9367–9372 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Suzuki, T. et al. An unexpected example of protein-templated click chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 6817–6820 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hu, X., Sun, J., Wang, H.-G. & Manetsch, R. Bcl-XL-templated assembly of its own protein− protein interaction modulator from fragments decorated with thio acids and sulfonyl azides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13820–13821 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kulkarni, S. S., Hu, X., Doi, K., Wang, H.-G. & Manetsch, R. Screening of protein–protein interaction modulators via sulfo-click kinetic target-guided synthesis. ACS Chem. Biol. 6, 724–732 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Becker, D. et al. Irreversible inhibitors of the 3C protease of Coxsackie virus through templated assembly of protein-binding fragments. Nat. Commun. 7, 12761 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jaegle, M., Steinmetzer, T. & Rademann, J. Protein-templated formation of an inhibitor of the blood coagulation Factor Xa through a background-free amidation reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 3718–3722 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bar-Natan, M., Nelson, E. A., Xiang, M. & Frank, D. A. STAT signaling in the pathogenesis and treatment of myeloid malignancies. JAK-STAT 1, 55–64 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cumaraswamy, A. A., Todic, A., Resetca, D., Minden, M. D. & Gunning, P. T. Inhibitors of Stat5 protein signalling. MedChemComm 3, 22–27 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gianti, E. & Zauhar, R. An SH2 domain model of STAT5 in complex with phospho-peptides define “STAT5-binding signatures”. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 25, 1–20 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Liu, S. et al. Targeting STAT5 in hematological malignancies through inhibition of the bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) bromodomain protein BRD2. Mol. Cancer Ther. 13, 1194–1205 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Horatscheck, A. et al. Benzoylphosphonate-based photoactive phosphopeptide mimetics for modulation of protein tyrosine phosphatases and highly specific labeling of SH2 domains. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9441–9447 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Schust, J., Sperl, B., Hollis, A., Mayer, T. U. & Berg, T. Stattic: a small-molecule inhibitor of STAT3 activation and dimerization. Chem. Biol. 13, 1235–1242 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cumaraswamy, A. A. et al. Nanomolar-potency small molecule inhibitor of STAT5 protein. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 5, 1202–1206 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Elumalai, N., Berg, A., Natarajan, K., Scharow, A. & Berg, T. Nanomolar inhibitors of the transcription factor STAT5b with high selectivity over STAT5a. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 4758–4763 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Page, B. D. G. et al. Small molecule STAT5-SH2 domain inhibitors exhibit potent antileukemia activity. J. Med. Chem. 55, 1047–1055 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lisurek, M. et al. Design of chemical libraries with potentially bioactive molecules applying a maximum common substructure concept. Mol. Divers. 14, 401–408 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hopkins, A. L., Keseru, G. M., Leeson, P. D., Rees, D. C. & Reynolds, C. H. The role of ligand efficiency metrics in drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 13, 105–121 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fedorov, O., Niesen, F. H. & Knapp, S. Kinase inhibitor selectivity profiling using differential scanning fluorimetry. Methods Mol. Biol. 795, 109–118 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Niesen, F. H., Berglund, H. & Vedadi, M. The use of differential scanning fluorimetry to detect ligand interactions that promote protein stability. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2212–2221 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Neculai, D. et al. Structure of the unphosphorylated STAT5a dimer. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 40782–40787 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Barr, A. J. et al. Large-scale structural analysis of the classical human protein tyrosine phosphatome. Cell 136, 352–363 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hirsch, A. K., Fischer, F. R. & Diederich, F. Phosphate recognition in structural biology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 338–352 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Elumalai, N. et al. Rational development of Stafib-2: a selective, nanomolar inhibitor of the transcription factor STAT5b. Sci. Rep. 7, 819 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wingelhofer, B. et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of STAT5 in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 32, 1135–1146 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Almqvist, H. et al. CETSA screening identifies known and novel thymidylate synthase inhibitors and slow intracellular activation of 5-fluorouracil. Nat. Commun. 7, 11040 (2016).

  36. 36.

    Molina, D. M. et al. Monitoring drug target engagement in cells and tissues using the cellular thermal shift assay. Science 341, 84–87 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mizuki, M. et al. Flt3 mutations from patients with acute myeloid leukemia induce transformation of 32D cells mediated by the Ras and STAT5 pathways. Blood 96, 3907–3914 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kindler, T., Lipka, D. B. & Fischer, T. FLT3 as a therapeutic target in AML: still challenging after all these years. Blood 116, 5089–5102 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mandal, P. K. et al. Potent and selective phosphopeptide mimetic prodrugs targeted to the Src Homology 2 (SH2) domain of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. J. Med. Chem. 54, 3549–3563 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jafari, R. et al. The cellular thermal shift assay for evaluating drug target interactions in cells. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2100–2122 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Fabbro, D. et al. PKC412-a protein kinase inhibitor with a broad therapeutic potential. Anticancer Drug Des. 15, 17–28 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Weisberg, E. et al. Inhibition of mutant FLT3 receptors in leukemia cells by the small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor PKC412. Cancer Cell 1, 433–443 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chou, T. C. Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou–Talalay method. Cancer Res. 70, 440–446 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Croucher, D. C. et al. The potent STAT3/5 Inhibitor, BP-1-102 demonstrates significant anti-tumor activity against Waldenström Macroglobulinemia. Am. Soc. Hematol. 118, 5101-5101 (2011).

  45. 45.

    Lim, J. S. J. et al. Extended cohort study of OPB51602, a novel inhibitor of STAT3/5 activation, in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 15, 8028–8028 (2014).

  46. 46.

    Burgos-Barragan, G. et al. Mammals divert endogenous genotoxic formaldehyde into one-carbon metabolism. Nature 548, 549 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Brewer, T. F. & Chang, C. J. An aza-cope reactivity-based fluorescent probe for imaging formaldehyde in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 10886–10889 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Krishna, S. N. et al. A fluorescence-based thermal shift assay identifies inhibitors of mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 4. PLoS. ONE 8, e81504 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Qian, Y.-H., Xiao, Q., Chen, H. & Xu, J. Dexamethasone inhibits camptothecin-induced apoptosis in C6-glioma via activation of Stat5/Bcl-xL pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1793, 764–771 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support is gratefully acknowledged from the Investitionsbank Berlin (grant No. 10142914), the Deutsche Krebshilfe, and the DFG (FOR 806, SFB765, and the Berlin School of Integrative Oncology for a fellowship granted to E.L.W.). We thank Professor Thorsten Berg, University of Leipzig, for the plasmid containing STAT5-MBP and Professor Carol Stocking, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf for providing us with the BaF3/FLT3-ITD cell line. We are grateful to Dr. Anne Diehl, FMP, for protein expression, to Dr. Jens Peter von Kries, FMP, for screening support, to Dr. María Isabel Fernández-Bachiller, FU Berlin, for initial discussion on FP assays, and to Thomas Rudolf, FU Berlin, for supporting chemical synthesis.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.R., E.L.W., D.C., and C.A. conceived and designed the experiments, E.L.W., B.G.K., S.B., and X.W. performed the experiments. E.L.W., C.A., M.L., and J.R. analyzed the data. E.N., B.G.K., S.B., C.A., and S.W. contributed reagents. J.R. and E.L.W. wrote the manuscript. J.R. acquired funding for and administered the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Rademann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal Peer Review Information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, E.L., Nawrotzky, E., Arkona, C. et al. The transcription factor STAT5 catalyzes Mannich ligation reactions yielding inhibitors of leukemic cell proliferation. Nat Commun 10, 66 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07923-2

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing