Article | Open | Published:

# Uniform doping of graphene close to the Dirac point by polymer-assisted assembly of molecular dopants

## Abstract

Tuning the charge carrier density of two-dimensional (2D) materials by incorporating dopants into the crystal lattice is a challenging task. An attractive alternative is the surface transfer doping by adsorption of molecules on 2D crystals, which can lead to ordered molecular arrays. However, such systems, demonstrated in ultra-high vacuum conditions (UHV), are often unstable in ambient conditions. Here we show that air-stable doping of epitaxial graphene on SiC—achieved by spin-coating deposition of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-tetracyano-quino-dimethane (F4TCNQ) incorporated in poly(methyl-methacrylate)—proceeds via the spontaneous accumulation of dopants at the graphene-polymer interface and by the formation of a charge-transfer complex that yields low-disorder, charge-neutral, large-area graphene with carrier mobilities ~70 000 cm2 V−1 s−1 at cryogenic temperatures. The assembly of dopants on 2D materials assisted by a polymer matrix, demonstrated by spin-coating wafer-scale substrates in ambient conditions, opens up a scalable technological route toward expanding the functionality of 2D materials.

## Introduction

Homogeneous doping of graphene down to low carrier densities enables the study of delicate and fascinating physics at the Dirac point. The prime experimental archetypes for the study of Dirac physics in solid-state devices are van der Waals (VdW) hetero-structures of graphene and hexagonal boron nitride (hBN). In these, extremely low carrier densities in graphene are attainable, especially when prepared on atomically flat, electrically conductive substrates that screen long-range potential fluctuations (i.e. disorder) in the graphene layer1,2. Typically microscopic in size, VdW hetero-structures are prone to size-induced mesoscopic effects that obscure novel physical effects expected in graphene at charge neutrality. Large-area graphene, uniformly doped to the Dirac point as in the case of VdW hetero-structures, is required to unveil the intimate details of, for instance, metal-insulator transitions3, interacting Dirac fermions4, and Zitterbewegung of electrons in graphene5. Atomically flat, large-scale epitaxial graphene on SiC (SiC/G) has demonstrated its potential for scalability in applications that demand extremely high-quality graphene over large areas, including quantum metrology6,7 and high-frequency electronics8,9. Yet, in practice, carrier density control of SiC/G remains a challenge because of high intrinsic n-doping (n > 1013 cm−2) due to interaction with the substrate, making it difficult to substantially tune its carrier concentration10. While numerous gating techniques have been applied to SiC/G to reduce its carrier density8,9, such approaches introduce carrier density fluctuations, which prevent further explorations of Dirac physics in this material.

Here we show a molecular approach to control the carrier density of epitaxial graphene homogeneously over macroscopic areas, yielding graphene with low carrier density (n < 1010 cm−2), low charge fluctuations (at the level of Δn ≈ ± 6 × 109 cm−2), and carrier mobilities up to 70 000 cm2 V−1 s−1 at low temperatures. So far, such electron transport properties have only been attained in microscopic single-crystal graphene flakes encapsulated by hBN11 or in suspended graphene12. The doping method described here was applied to samples over 5 × 5 mm2, resulting in epitaxial graphene devices that display quantum Hall effect at magnetic fields B < 1 T. These measurements indicate, as we elaborate below, a highly homogeneous spatial distribution of charge carriers on graphene. Chemical analysis reveals that air-stable molecular doping of graphene is achieved when organic molecules, embedded in a polymer matrix, diffuse through the matrix and spontaneously accumulate at the graphene surface due to formation of a charge-transfer complex. High-electron-affinity 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-tetracyano-quino-dimethane (F4TCNQ) molecules are mixed in a liquid solution with poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA) and spin-coated at ambient conditions on SiC/G, with graphene being used both as the target substrate for molecular assembly and, simultaneously, as a charge sensor. The stability of the samples allows us to study the chemical composition as well as electronic transport properties of the F4TCNQ/graphene system. We expect this method to open up a scalable route toward expanding the properties and functionality of graphene and other two-dimensional (2D) materials well beyond doping control.

## Results

### Doping schemes

The different chemical doping schemes of graphene devices are shown in Fig. 1b. Our devices include large (W = 5 mm × L = 5 mm) (Fig. 1a) and small (W = 2–100 μm × L = 10–180 μm) epitaxial graphene Hall bars fabricated by conventional electron beam lithography (see Methods section). When PMMA is used as a spacer between graphene and the molecular dopant layer, the carrier density decreases three orders of magnitude from its pristine value, n ≈ 1 × 1013 cm−2 to near charge neutrality, n ≈ 1 × 1010 cm−2 (Fig. 1c). Importantly, even at such low carrier densities the carrier mobility remains high, with the largest measured value exceeding μ ≈ 50 000 cm2 V−1 s−1 at T = 2 K. The effect of doping is homogeneous over millimeter scale and large samples display quantum Hall effect at magnetic fields B < 1 T (Fig. 1a), retaining their low carrier density over the course of 2 years, even under ambient conditions (Supplementary Fig. 1). To achieve this, a 200-nm-thick layer of the PMMA-F4TCNQ dopant blend is spin-coated onto a PMMA-protected sample, followed by thermal annealing above the PMMA glass transition temperature. The resulting carrier density could be fine-tuned by the total annealing time. For a concentration of 7% of F4TCNQ in PMMA by weight, charge-neutral graphene is achieved after annealing at T = 160 °C for 5 min. Shorter annealing times yield hole-doping and longer times yield electron-doping (Supplementary Fig. 1). Using the optimal time, we have consistently observed a decrease in electron density by three orders of magnitude together with a tenfold increase of carrier mobility at T = 2 K in more than 20 devices on 11 different chips (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2). Typical carrier concentrations in doped samples are of the order of 5 × 1011 cm−2 at room temperature. They decrease to values 1 × 1010 cm−2 at T = 2 K, due to freezing of thermally activated carriers13. The corresponding carrier mobilities are in the range of 30 000–50 000 cm2 V−1 s−1 (Fig. 1d). The PMMA spacer layer plays a crucial role in achieving high carrier mobilities. While both PMMA and the dopant blend act independently as moderate p-dopants when deposited directly on SiC/G, it is only when the PMMA spacer layer is added between graphene and the dopant blend that we observe the near to charge neutrality doping effect. Similarly, carrier mobilities exceed 10 000 cm2 V−1 s−1 only if the PMMA spacer and dopant blend operate in tandem (Supplementary Fig. 3).

### Chemical analysis of graphene-polymer hetero-structure

We demonstrate that the doping of graphene is the result of F4TCNQ molecules diffusing through the PMMA layer and accumulating at the graphene surface. Figure 2a, b shows the chemical depth profile of the polymer stack, obtained by using time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), revealing both diffusion of F4TCNQ through the PMMA spacer and the accumulation of molecules at the graphene surface. From this we estimate the diffusion coefficient of F4TCNQ through PMMA to be of the order of 1014 cm2 s−1 and by integrating the areas under the ion current intensity curves, we estimate the density of F4TCNQ molecules near the graphene surface to be ~4.6 × 1014 cm−2 (Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Note 1). Graphene and metallic surfaces promote the accumulation of F4TCNQ, while there are virtually no dopant molecules at the polymer/SiC interface. The surface density of F4TCNQ is roughly 50% greater on graphene (and sixfold higher on gold) compared to that in the dopant blend layer (Fig. 2c). We attribute the accumulation of F4TCNQ on the graphene surface and the measured p-doping effect to the formation of a charge transfer complex, with partially charged F4TCNQ remaining at the graphene interface to preserve overall charge neutrality. F4TCNQ is known to be mobile in thin polymer films14,15, with its diffusion depending on polarity and glass transition temperature of the polymer. When using an inert PMMA as a host matrix, F4TCNQ remains neutral both in the doping layer and as it diffuses through PMMA spacer layer16. The formation of a charge transfer complex takes place only when encountering an electron donor, such as graphene. Once charged, the F4TCNQ anion is bound to graphene, stabilized by Coulomb interaction17.

### Low charge disorder in SiC/G doped close to Dirac point

We investigated further electron transport details of the F4TCNQ-graphene charge-transfer complex system by introducing a top electrostatic gate (Fig. 3a, inset) on top of a 30 μm × 180 μm Hall bar. The top gate enables additional fine tuning of the carrier concentration within Δn ~ 5 × 1011 cm−2 using gate voltages VG = −100 to +200 V. At VG = 0 V the carrier density is n = 5 × 1011 cm−2 at room temperature and graphene is in the metallic limit. In this case, ρXX(T, VG = 0 V) decreases linearly with temperature from its room temperature value, due to suppression of acoustic phonon scattering. Quantum corrections to resistance result in a log(T) dependence below the Bloch-Grüneisen temperature $${{T}}_{{\mathrm{BG}}} = 2v_{{\mathrm{ph}}}{{E}}_{\mathrm{F}}/\left( {k_{\mathrm{B}}v_{\mathrm{F}}} \right) = 2v_{{\mathrm{ph}}}\hbar v_{\mathrm{F}}\sqrt {\pi n} /\left( {k_{\mathrm{B}}v_{\mathrm{F}}} \right) \approx 38\,{\mathrm{K}}$$, with the phonon velocity νph = 2 × 104 m s−1 ($${{E}}_{\mathrm{F}} = \hbar v_{\mathrm{F}}\sqrt {\pi n}$$ the Fermi level of graphene, ħ the reduced Planck’s constant, kB the Boltzmann constant, and ѵF = 106 m s−1 the Fermi velocity in graphene18). In contrast, when graphene is gated to the Dirac point, the sheet resistance ρXX(T, Vg = −50 V) monotonically increases as the temperature drops, though remains finite with no indication of a transport gap in the current voltage characteristics down to T = 2 K (Fig. 3a).

To characterize the magnitude of carrier density fluctuations (i.e. how precisely one can approach the Dirac point) we conducted low-temperature magnetotransport measurements on chemically and electrostatically gated devices and found these fluctuations to be on the level of Δn ~ ± 6 × 109 cm−2EF ~ ± 9 meV). Figure 3b shows longitudinal resistance vs. carrier concentration in which every data point, extracted from individual measurements of ρXX(B), RXY(B) at a fixed gate voltage, corresponds to devices behaving as a system with a single electronic band and spatially homogenous carrier density19,20,21,22,23. That is, data points in Fig. 3b fulfill simultaneously the criteria of linear RXY(B) at low fields19,20,21,22, and fully developed half-integer quantum Hall Effect at high fields23, i.e. ρXX(B) = 0 Ω and strictly quantized RXY plateau over the entire available range of magnetic field (Supplementary Fig. 5). The gap in data around zero carrier concentration thus corresponds to data points where graphene is in the charge puddle regime. Under quantizing conditions, the residual disorder in the sample causes non-zero and oscillatory ρXX(B) once the magnetic length approaches the average charge puddle size23,24. In our samples with low carrier density concentration ~1010 cm−2 we have observed no deviation from ρXX(B) = 0 to the largest magnetic field available in our setup (B = 14 T) (Supplementary Fig. 5). Thus, we establish an upper limit for the puddle size of about $$l_{\mathrm{B}} = \sqrt {\hbar /{{eB}}} \approx 7\,{\mathrm{nm}}$$. The charge puddle magnitude is directly connected to disorder introduced by, e.g., topography or inhomogeneous doping25. The small magnitude of charge puddles measured in our devices indicate that SiC/G doped with F4TCNQ molecules is homogenous also at the microscopic scale, with carrier density fluctuations comparable to those in high-quality, hBN-encapsulated single-crystal graphene flakes obtained by exfoliation11 or by chemical vapor deposition growth26 (Supplementary Fig. 6).

It is remarkable that epitaxial graphene displays such low disorder even at extreme dopant coverage, being decorated with a dense layer of molecules of about 3–4 molecules per nm2 (c ≈ 3 × 1014 cm−2, comparable to the molecular coverage of c ≈ 4.6 × 1014 cm−2 from SIMS). We estimated the molecular density at the graphene surface from the shift in carrier density measured in doped graphene with respect to its pristine concentration (Δn ≈ 1 × 1013 cm−2), and assuming that 0.3 electrons are withdrawn from epitaxial graphene per molecule27,28 with 1/10 gate efficiency10. The homogeneity in doping is in part enabled by the high degree of F4TCNQ dispersion inside the PMMA matrix, shown by room temperature grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXs). The diffractogram in Fig. 4a, b reveals a broad amorphous halo with a distinct diffraction peak at q = 9.6 nm−1 from PMMA (Supplementary Note 2). The absence of diffraction spots from F4TCNQ implies the lack of molecular aggregation (i.e. crystallites) inside the matrix. Given the size of the F4TCNQ molecule, we propose that at this packing density a feasible molecular orientation of F4TCNQ is close to that of molecules standing up on the graphene surface28. Yet, we do not rule out molecular re-orientation or thermally induced redistribution of charges in the dopant layer under the effect of electric field, even at low temperatures. Such charge redistribution in the dopants in close vicinity to graphene may be responsible for screening charge inhomogeneities that facilitate highly uniform doping1. Thermally activated motion of charges in the dopant layer is a plausible source of the hysteresis in ρXX(T) when devices are subjected to thermal excursion from T = 2 to 230 K (Fig. 4c). This is also suggested by more accurate resistance measurements, which reveal that charges in the dopant layer are mobile down to T ≈ 113 K (Supplementary Fig. 7), in notable coincidence with the energy scale of the measured charge inhomogeneity in doped epitaxial graphene (ΔEF ~ ± 9 meV). The charge homogeneity of the samples is thus determined by the temperature at which the screening charges freeze.

## Discussion

A possible explanation for the observed low disorder and high charge carrier mobility of SiC/G at large molecular coverage is a high degree of spatial correlation between adsorbed F4TCNQ and impurities present on bare graphene. Together with the low charge carrier density fluctuations, increasing impurity (e.g. F4TCNQ) density can lead to suppression of charge scattering in graphene if there is sufficient inter-impurity correlation present in the system29,30 (Supplementary Fig. 8). The actual organization and conformation of charged molecules on graphene is the result of delicate balance between molecule-graphene interactions as well as the intermolecular many-body dispersion forces31 in the presence of polymer. While the exact arrangement of molecules on graphene is difficult to probe through the thick polymer layers with surface science techniques, the graphene layer itself utilized as detector allows gaining an insight of such molecular reorganization at the polymer-graphene interface.

In summary, we presented a method of guiding the assembly of molecular dopants onto the surface of graphene by using an organic polymer matrix. With the doping stability observed in our samples, the tuneability of molecular coverage, and given the vast catalog of polymers and organic/organo-metallic molecules, we expect this method to open up a scalable route toward expanding the properties and functionality of graphene and other 2D materials well beyond doping control. Moreover, the presented analysis of chemical and electron transport properties of doped graphene sheds light on the complex processes that molecular dopants undergo when embedded in polymers. This is relevant to the understanding of performance, materials, and interfaces in organic electronic devices, especially when combined with 2D materials. This method can be explored in the future to create and study electron transport properties of novel 2D systems of ordered molecular arrays templated by 2D crystals32,33,34,35.

## Methods

### Sample fabrication

Monolayer SiC/G was grown on the Si-face of SiC using thermal decomposition of 7 mm × 7 mm 4H(0001)-SiC substrates. The samples were grown in argon atmosphere of 800 mbar, and kept at a temperature of around 1700 °C for 5 min36. Optical microscopy37 revealed a typical surface coverage of >95% monolayer graphene.

Epitaxial graphene Hall bars were fabricated using electron beam lithography described in detail elsewhere38. The electrical contacts were fabricated using physical vapor deposition of Ti and Au, 5 and 80 nm thick, respectively. After fabrication samples were cleaned using isopropyl alcohol, acetone, and dried using nitrogen gas. For pristine SiC/G (shown in Fig. 1b) a hBN flake was exfoliated and transferred to pristine SiC/G using a polydimethylsiloxane stamp. To clean the interface the sample was annealed in argon 800 mbar at 755 °C, after which standard lithography was performed.

The dopant blend consisted of a mixture of F4TCNQ (Sigma-Aldrich) and PMMA (Microlithography Chemicals Corp., molecular weight 950 000). A unit of 25 mg of dry F4TCNQ powder was mixed with 3 ml anisole solvent. A volume of 0.5 ml of this solution was then mixed with 1 ml PMMA A6 (6% PMMA by weight in anisole). The PMMA spacer layer and encapsulation layers used either PMMA A4 (5% by weight in anisole) or PMMA-based copolymer (MMA (8.5) MAA) EL6 (6% by weight in ethyl lactate solvent). All polymer layers were deposited on graphene using spin-coating at 6000 rpm for 1 min. After each spin-coating step a 5 min baking step on a hotplate set at 160 °C follows. The dopant blend is an exception, since the baking time dictates the final doping level.

The electrostatic top gate was fabricated using a shadow mask, and physical vapor deposition of Au in order to avoid disruption of the chemically doped sample. In order to preserve the integrity of the doping strength of graphene, additional layers of dopant blend and PMMA encapsulation layers were deposited before fabrication of the gate. The samples with the full stack of five polymer layers are the most resilient to drift in carrier concentrations in ambient conditions.

### Electrical measurements

Standard electrical characterization was performed in a liquid 4He gas flow cryostat, which allowed for temperatures down to 2 K and magnetic fields up to 14 T. All reported values of charge carrier mobility and charge carrier concentration were extracted from four-probe Hall and quantum Hall measurements. The standard measurement setup used current biased samples at maximum of 100 nA DC (Keithley 6221 DC and AC current source, Agilent 34420 A nanovolt meter), in this range samples showed linear IV characteristics down to cryogenic temperatures. The electrostatic top gate was DC biased with voltages ranging from −100 to +200 V, where leakage current was <0.05 nA.

### Secondary ion mass spectrometry

ToF-SIMS analysis was performed using a TOF.SIMS 5 instrument (ION-TOF GmbH, Münster, Germany). The instrument is equipped with a 25 keV Bi3+ cluster ion gun as the primary ion source and a 10 keV C60+ ion source for sputtering and etching. The samples were analyzed using a pulsed primary ion beam (Bi3++, 0.34 pA at 50 keV) with a focus of approximately 2 μm at a field of view of 150 µm × 150 µm. The mass resolution using this setup was at least MM = 5000 full width at half maximum at m/z 500. All spectra were acquired and processed with the Surface Lab software (version 6.4, ION-TOF GmbH). Depth profile analysis was performed using a C60++ beam at 20 keV with a current of 0.2 nA in a non-interlaced mode with 1 s of analysis, 1 s of sputtering, and a pause of 1 s for each sputter cycle at 350 µm × 350 µm. The maximum ion dose density of Bi3++ was kept between 4 × 1012 and 7 × 1012 cm−2 over the whole depth profiling experiment, while the ion dose for C60++ ranged from 2 × 1014 to 4 × 1014 ions per cm2. Low-energy electrons were used for charge compensation during analysis.

### Grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering

Data were obtained at the D1-beam line at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source at Cornell University. The measurements used a positron beam with synchrotron radiation of a wavelength of 1.162 Å, Pilatus 200K detector with pixel size of 172 μm × 172 μm and sample to detector distance of 177.2 mm. Measurements were done in ambient conditions at room temperature. The exposure time for each individual measurement was 20 s.

## Data availability

The authors declare that the main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Extra data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Ponomarenko, L. A. et al. Tunable metal–insulator transition in double-layer graphene heterostructures. Nat. Phys. 7, 958–961 (2011).

2. 2.

Hunt, B., Taniguchi, T., Moon, P., Koshino, M. & Ashoori, R. C. Massive Dirac Fermions and hofstadter butterfly in a van der Waals heterostructure. Science 340, 1427–1431 (2013).

3. 3.

Evers, F. & Mirlin, A. D. Anderson transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355–1417 (2008).

4. 4.

Müller, M., Fritz, L. & Sachdev, S. Quantum-critical relativistic magnetotransport in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 78, 115406 (2008).

5. 5.

Katsnelson, M. I. Zitterbewegung, chirality, and minimal conductivity in graphene. Eur. Phys. J. B 51, 157–160 (2006).

6. 6.

Tzalenchuk, A. et al. Towards a quantum resistance standard based on epitaxial graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 186–189 (2010).

7. 7.

Janssen, T. et al. Operation of graphene quantum Hall resistance standard in a cryogen-free table-top system. 2D Mater. 2, 35015 (2015).

8. 8.

Wu, Y. et al. State-of-the-art graphene high-frequency electronics. Nano Lett. 12, 3062–3067 (2012).

9. 9.

Lin, Y. M. et al. 100-GHz transistors from wafer-scale epitaxial graphene. Science 327, 662 (2010).

10. 10.

Kopylov, S., Tzalenchuk, A., Kubatkin, S. & Fal’ko, V. I. Charge transfer between epitaxial graphene and silicon carbide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 11–14 (2010).

11. 11.

Xue, J. et al. Scanning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy of ultra-flat graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Mater. 10, 282–285 (2011).

12. 12.

Mayorov, A. S. et al. How close can one approach the dirac point in graphene experimentally? Nano Lett. 12, 4629–4634 (2012).

13. 13.

Li, Q., Hwang, E. H. & Das Sarma, S. Disorder-induced temperature-dependent transport in graphene: puddles, impurities, activation, and diffusion. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 84, 115442 (2011).

14. 14.

Li, J. et al. Measurement of small molecular dopant F4TCNQ and C60F36 diffusion in organic bilayer architectures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 28420–28428 (2015).

15. 15.

Jacobs, I. E. & Moul, A. J. Controlling molecular doping in organic semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 29, 1703063 (2017).

16. 16.

Pingel, P. & Neher, D. Comprehensive picture of p-type doping of P3HT with the molecular acceptor F4TCNQ. Phys. Rev. B 87, 115209 (2013).

17. 17.

Li, J. et al. Quantitative measurements of the temperature-dependent microscopic and macroscopic dynamics of a molecular dopant in a conjugated polymer. Macromolecules 50, 5476–5489 (2017).

18. 18.

Lara-Avila, S. et al. Disordered Fermi liquid in epitaxial graphene from quantum transport measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 166602 (2011).

19. 19.

Cho, S. & Fuhrer, M. S. Charge transport and inhomogeneity near the minimum conductivity point in graphene. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 77, 081402 (2008).

20. 20.

Tiwari, R. P. & Stroud, D. Model for the magnetoresistance and Hall coefficient of inhomogeneous graphene. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 79, 165408 (2009).

21. 21.

Ping, J. et al. Disorder-induced magnetoresistance in a two-dimensional electron system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 047206 (2014).

22. 22.

Knap, M., Sau, J. D., Halperin, B. I. & Demler, E. Transport in two-dimensional disordered semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 186801 (2014).

23. 23.

Yang, M. et al. Puddle-induced resistance oscillations in the breakdown of the graphene quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 1–5 (2016).

24. 24.

Poumirol, J. M. et al. Electron–hole coexistence in disordered graphene probed by high-field magneto-transport. New J. Phys. 12, 083006 (2010).

25. 25.

Zhang, Y., Brar, V. W., Girit, C., Zettl, A. & Crommie, M. F. Origin of spatial charge inhomogeneity in graphene. Nat. Phys. 5, 722–726 (2009).

26. 26.

Banszerus, L. et al. Ultrahigh-mobility graphene devices from chemical vapor deposition on reusable copper. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500222–e1500222 (2015).

27. 27.

Chen, W., Chen, S., Dong, C. Q., Xing, Y. G. & Wee, A. T. S. Surface transfer p-type doping of epitaxial graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10418–10422 (2007).

28. 28.

Coletti, C. et al. Charge neutrality and band-gap tuning of epitaxial graphene on SiC by molecular doping. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 81, 235401 (2010).

29. 29.

Li, Q., Hwang, E. H., Rossi, E. & Das Sarma, S. Theory of 2D transport in graphene for correlated disorder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 156601 (2011).

30. 30.

Yan, J. & Fuhrer, M. S. Correlated charged impurity scattering in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 206601 (2011).

31. 31.

Yang, S., Jiang, Y., Li, S. & Liu, W. Many-body dispersion effects on the binding of TCNQ and F4-TCNQ with graphene. Carbon N. Y. 111, 513–518 (2017).

32. 32.

Mao, J. et al. Tunability of supramolecular kagome lattices of magnetic phthalocyanines using graphene-based moiré patterns as templates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 14136–14137 (2009).

33. 33.

Cho, J. et al. Structural and electronic decoupling of C 60 from epitaxial graphene on sic. Nano Lett. 12, 3018–3024 (2012).

34. 34.

Wang, Q. H. & Hersam, M. C. Room-temperature molecular-resolution characterization of self-assembled organic monolayers on epitaxial graphene. Nat. Chem. 1, 206–211 (2009).

35. 35.

Tsai, H.-Z. et al. Molecular self-assembly in a poorly screened environment: F 4 TCNQ on graphene/BN. ACS Nano 9, 12168–12173 (2015).

36. 36.

Virojanadara, C. et al. Homogeneous large-area graphene layer growth on 6H-SiC(0001). Phys. Rev. B 78, 245403 (2008).

37. 37.

Yager, T. et al. Express optical analysis of epitaxial graphene on SiC: impact of morphology on quantum transport. Nano Lett. 13, 4217–4223 (2013).

38. 38.

Yager, T. et al. Low contact resistance in epitaxial graphene devices for quantum metrology. AIP Adv. 5, 87134 (2015).

## Acknowledgements

We thank Dmitry Golubev, Alexander Tzalenchuk, and Tord Claeson for useful discussion and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was jointly supported by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) (No. IS14-0053, GMT14-0077, and RMA15-0024), Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Chalmers Area of Advance NANO, the Swedish Research Council (VR) 2015–03758 and 2016–048287, the Swedish-Korean Basic Research Cooperative Program of the NRF (No. NRF-2017R1A2A1A18070721), and European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 766714/HiTIMe). We thank Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS) for providing time for GIWAXs measurements. CHESS is supported by the NSF & NIH/NIGMS via NSF award DMR-1332208.

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### Department of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden

• Hans He
• , Kyung Ho Kim
• , Andrey Danilov
• , Domenico Montemurro
• , Floriana Lombardi
• , Thilo Bauch
• , Sergey Kubatkin
•  & Samuel Lara-Avila
2. #### Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea

• Kyung Ho Kim
•  & Yung Woo Park
3. #### Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296, Göteborg, Sweden

• Liyang Yu
• , Kasper Moth-Poulsen
• , Per Malmberg
•  & Christian Müller
4. #### Institute of Applied Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea

• Yung Woo Park
5. #### Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA

• Yung Woo Park
6. #### Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linkoping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden

• Tihomir Iakimov
•  & Rositsa Yakimova
7. #### National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK

• Samuel Lara-Avila

### Contributions

H.H. and S.L.-A. fabricated samples, performed transport measurements, and analyzed data. K.H.K., A.D., D.M., F.L., Y.W.P. and T.B. performed transport experiments. P.M. performed and analyzed SIMS measurements. K.M.-P., L.Y. and C.M. analyzed GIWAXS measurements. H.H. and S.L.A. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from all of the authors. S.K. and S.L.A. conceived and designed the experiment.

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Lara-Avila.