Abstract

Mechanism-based glycoside hydrolase inhibitors are carbohydrate analogs that mimic the natural substrate’s structure. Their covalent bond formation with the glycoside hydrolase makes these compounds excellent tools for chemical biology and potential drug candidates. Here we report the synthesis of cyclohexene-based α-galactopyranoside mimics and the kinetic and structural characterization of their inhibitory activity toward an α-galactosidase from Thermotoga maritima (TmGalA). By solving the structures of several enzyme-bound species during mechanism-based covalent inhibition of TmGalA, we show that the Michaelis complexes for intact inhibitor and product have half-chair (2H3) conformations for the cyclohexene fragment, while the covalently linked intermediate adopts a flattened half-chair (2H3) conformation. Hybrid QM/MM calculations confirm the structural and electronic properties of the enzyme-bound species and provide insight into key interactions in the enzyme-active site. These insights should stimulate the design of mechanism-based glycoside hydrolase inhibitors with tailored chemical properties.

Introduction

Of the three main biological polymeric building blocks, carbohydrates are the most structurally diverse. Unlike DNA and proteins, their sequence is not templated and instead relies on the activity and specificity of enzyme-catalyzed processes that use carbohydrates and their derivatives as substrates1. For example, glycoside hydrolases (GHs)2 are ubiquitous in nature and catalyze the removal of carbohydrates from a range of biomolecules. Thus GHs are not only critical for digesting carbohydrates and degrading plant biomass but are also key players in pathogen infection, antibacterial defense, and many other essential cellular processes3. As a result, natural product inhibitors of GHs, including castanospermine4, mannostatin A5, nojirimycin6, and acarbose7, are often pursued as therapeutics (Fig. 1a). For example, starting with the natural product Neu2en5Ac8 medicinal chemical approaches gave rise to the influenza therapeutic oseltamivir (Fig. 1b)9.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Select competitive inhibitors of glycoside hydrolases. a Representative natural products. b Natural product (Neu2en5Ac) inspired therapeutic agent (oseltamivir)

Of note, many GH inhibitors incorporate a basic nitrogen atom6 that mimics the nascent charge of pyranosylium ion-like transition states10 (Fig. 2a). Structural elements that mimic enzyme-bound substrates11 and preclude a ground state chair conformation include sp2-hybridized ring atoms12, five-membered rings5, or bicyclic scaffolds4,13 and are also common features in GH inhibitors. Considering that GHs exhibit high catalytic proficiencies (~1017 M–1)14,15, deciphering structures along the reaction pathway can lead to improved understanding of their catalytic mechanism and profoundly affect inhibitor design16. Of the GH mechanisms that catalyze glycosidic bond hydrolysis, most that occur with retention of stereochemistry rely on two active site aspartic acid (Asp) and/or glutamic acid (Glu) residues (Fig. 2a)1,10,17,18. These enzymes employ sequential SN2-like reactions, each involving an inversion of configuration, where the first generates a covalent glycosyl-enzyme intermediate and the second one hydrolyzes the intermediate1,10,19,20,21. Previously, we exploited the ability of GHs to stabilize anomeric positive charge development during glycosylation and deglycosylation in the design of cyclohexene22 (e.g., 1) and cyclopropylmethyl22,23,24 mechanism-based covalent GH inhibitors. The cyclohexene inhibitors likely undergo a pseudo-glucosylation reaction as shown for 1 (Fig. 2b)22. Recently, Danby and Withers reported that the related cyclohexene carbaglucose analog 2 was a substrate for several β-glucosidases (Fig. 2c)25. Here we present the synthesis of three cyclohexene-based mimics of galactose including a 2-deoxy-2-fluorogalactose analog and the kinetic characterization of their reactions with an α-galactosidase from Thermotoga maritima (TmGalA). The GH inhibitory activity of these compounds is compared with that of a 2-deoxy-2-fluoroglycoside and a cyclophellitol analog, both established inactivators26,27. We also present the structural characterization of our carbasugars with TmGalA in the form of Michaelis complexes for the inhibitor (with an active site mutant), the reaction products, and most critically, the covalent adduct formed during the turnover of our cyclohexene mimic of 2-deoxy-2-fluorogalactose. Using a combination of quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods, we also provide support for the X-ray structural results by localizing and characterizing the relevant enzyme-bound states.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Glycoside hydrolase catalysis and chemical structures for select inhibitors. a Mechanism for glucosylation with a natural substrate analog. b Proposed mechanism of pseudo-glucosylation for the allylic α-glucoside mimic 1. c Structures of mechanism-based 4-nitrophenyl covalent inhibitor 1; 2,4-dinitrophenyl β-glucoside analog 2; the α-galactose analog inhibitors 3a, b; the 2-deoxy-2-fluoro covalent inhibitors 4; 5, and 6 the hydrolyzed products for the α-galactose analog inhibitors 3 and 4, respectively; and two conventional glycoside hydrolase inactivators: 2-deoxy-2-fluorogalactoside (7) and cyclophellitol analog (8). For clarity, most hydroxyl groups are not shown for the transition state or intermediate in a, b

Results

Synthesis of cyclohexene galactose analogs

Previously, we have reported that the cyclohexene carbasugar 1 is a covalent inhibitor of yeast α-glucosidase (GH13 family)22 and that the reaction takes place through a covalent enzyme-bound intermediate, which undergoes slow hydrolysis to regenerate active enzyme. That is, covalent inhibitors result in reversible loss of enzyme activity, a process that is irreversible with covalent inactivators. As a result, we hypothesized that a galacto-configured analog would covalently label a GH36 α-galactosidase, a member of GH clan-D, that has as its main structural element a (β/α)8 fold, which is the same protein fold as found for family GH13. Notably, these two GH families bind bicyclo[4.1.0]heptyl amines (with the appropriate stereochemistry) tightly13,28. Initially, we used a tetra-O-benzylcyclohexenol24 that was arylated via an SNAr reaction after debenzylation with BCl3 in CH2Cl2 to give covalent inhibitor 3a. Unfortunately, after performing a variety of crystal soaking experiments with inhibitor 3a, only structures of the Michaelis complex (with an active site mutant) and product complex were obtained and no covalent adduct was observed (vide infra). In an effort to characterize structurally the covalent intermediate, we elected to (i) enhance the leaving group ability of the pseudo-aglycone and (ii) structurally modify the substituents on the cyclohexene ring in an effort to increase the lifetime of the covalent intermediate. Thus we targeted the galacto configured 2,4-dinitrophenyl ether 3b and the corresponding 2-fluoro analog 4, with the expectation that covalent intermediates would form faster and that the 2-fluoro group in 4 would decrease the rate of hydrolysis of the covalent intermediate29,30.

Synthesis of the 2-hydroxycarbasugar 3b started with 2-deoxy-l-ribose-derived aldehyde 9, which was subjected to a proline-catalyzed α-chlorination-aldol reaction (Fig. 3)31,32 that effects a dynamic kinetic resolution involving the racemization of chloroaldehydes 10 and 11 and delivered the anti-aldol-syn-chlorohydrin 13 in good yield and excellent diastereoselectivity (dr > 20:1)31. With chlorohydrin 13 in hand, several olefination methods were examined and we found that a Julia–Kocienski reaction31 using the lithium anion derived from methylsulfonyl phenyltetrazole delivered the diene 14 without requiring protection of the secondary alcohol function. Unfortunately, attempts to effect a ring closing metathesis (RCM)33,34,35 on this material using various catalysts returned only starting material. Also, removal of the TIPS protecting group (TBAF) followed by treatment with Grubbs’ first33 or second-generation34 catalyst resulted primarily in isomerization to the ethyl ketone 1736,37. In an effort to circumvent these problems and facilitate the desired RCM reaction, we converted chlorohydrin 14 into the corresponding syn-epoxide by treatment with CsOH in hot EtOH-H2O. While the TIPS-protected epoxyalcohol was not a productive substrate for a RCM, following the removal of the silyl protecting group the corresponding alcohol 15 was readily transformed into cyclohexene 16 using either Stewart–Grubbs'35 or Grubbs’ second-generation catalyst34. From here, conversion into the protected carbasugar simply involved reaction of the epoxy alcohol 16 with CO2 and CsCO3 in warm dimethylformamide (DMF), which afforded the carbonate 18 in excellent yield. Finally, removal of the carbonate and reaction of the resulting triol with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene23 afforded a mixture of arylated carbasugars from which the targeted dinitrophenyl adduct 3b could be isolated by preparative thin-layer chromatography (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Figs. 821).

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Synthesis of the cyclohexene carbagalactose analog 3b

The corresponding 2-fluorocarbasugar 4 was accessed following a similar route to that described above (Fig. 4). However, we modified our previously reported α-chlorination aldol reaction by first effecting a proline-catalyzed α-fluorination32,38,39,40 of aldehyde 9 using Selectfluor in DMF followed directly by reaction of the resulting unstable α-fluoroaldehyde (not shown) with dioxanone 12 in CH2Cl2. This subsequent proline-catalyzed aldol reaction proceeded smoothly to afford fluorohydrin 19 as a single diastereomer.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Synthesis of the 2-deoxy-2-fluorocarbagalactose analog 4

To mitigate degradation of the unstable aldol adduct 19, the crude reaction product was subjected directly to the optimized Julia–Kocienski olefination conditions41, which afforded the diene 20 as a stable and isolable intermediate. From here, acetylation of the free alcohol provided diene 21, which following removal of the TIPS protecting group, underwent RCM using Grubbs’ second-generation catalyst34 to afford protected 2-fluorocarbasugar 22 in excellent overall yield. Finally, arylation of the free alcohol function and global deprotection provided the target 2-fluorocarbasugar 4 in good yield (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Figs. 2229).

Evaluation of GH36 α-galactosidase covalent inhibitors

With the target molecules in hand, we first assayed the GH36 family α-galactosidase from T. maritima (TmGalA) with activated carbasugar analog 3b, which was turned over within 10 min and is therefore considered a poor substrate for TmGalA (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 1). Of note, we observed (using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in D2O) that compound 3b undergoes an intramolecular rearrangement to give the isomer in which the aryloxy group is attached to C-2 (i.e., 23, Supplementary Fig. 2) with a final equilibrium position (in D2O) is ~2:1 in favor of 3b (Supplementary Figs.30 and 31). As a result, our measured kinetic parameters kcat and kcat/Km for the hydrolysis of 3b by TmGalA (Table 1) are lower limits if, as expected, the enzyme does not bind the C2 aryloxy isomer.

Table 1 Kinetic parameters for the TmGalA-catalyzed reactions with 3b and 4

Next we measured the kinetic parameters for turnover of 4 by TmGalA (Table 1: Supplementary Fig. 3a shows a standard Michaelis–Menten plot for this hydrolysis reaction) and found that the apparent binding constant (Km) is in the low μM range. This result suggests that pseudo-deglycosylation of 4 is rate-limiting25 and that the replacement of the 2-hydroxyl group with a fluorine results in accumulation of the covalent intermediate. Consequently, we undertook a sequential mixing stopped-flow experiment to measure the rate constants for the pseudo-glycosylation reaction42. Plots of remaining α-galactosidase activity against incubation time for four concentrations of 4 are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. It is clear from these stopped-flow data of rate constant versus inhibitor concentration (Supplementary Fig. 3b) that we can only calculate the second-order rate constant kinact/Ki from these covalent labeling experiments. We next compared our covalent inhibitor with the corresponding α-galacto analogs from two well-characterized classes of GH inactivators. Specifically, we synthesized both 2,4-dinitrophenyl 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-α-d-galactopyranoside 7 and the cyclophellitol analog 8 following literature procedures43,44 with minor modifications (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Figs. 32 and 33). Of note, we observed no time-dependent decrease in TmGalA activity in the presence of 7; rather we determined that it is a poor substrate for GH36 α-galactosidase (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 5). As reported for the human GH27 enzyme44, cyclophellitol analog 8 forms the covalent intermediate with GH36 α-galactosidase in a time-dependent manner that is characterized by a second-order rate constant that is about 23,000-fold lower than that for 3b (Table 1, Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7).

Structural insights into carbasugar inhibition of TmGalA

With the aim of delineating the conformational itinerary for intermediates along the reaction path, we undertook structural studies to observe enzyme-bound species during the covalent inhibition of TmGalA by carbasugar 3a. In order to obtain a complex with intact 3a, we employed a D387A mutant of TmGalA in which the acid/base aspartic acid is mutated to alanine; this mutant displays an approximate 3100-fold reduction in its second-order rate constant (kcat/Km) relative to wild-type45 for the hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenyl α-d-galactopyranoside (Table 1). Crystals of TmGalA D387A that were soaked with 3a for 2 h diffracted to 2.20 Å resolution and the structure was solved using molecular replacement with apo TmGalA (PDB 5M0X) as the search model. We note that the active site contains electron density consistent with a Michaelis complex of an intact molecule of 3a bound (Fig. 5a). The carbasugar moiety displays a 2H3 half chair conformation with key interactions between the C6-OH with Asp221; the C4-OH with Trp257, Asp220, and Lys325; and the C3-OH with Lys325, Arg383, and Tyr191. The C2-OH and the 3,5-difluorophenyl leaving group of 3a form no interactions with TmGalA, and 3a itself has no interactions with bound water molecules.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Structure of TmGalA in complex with 3a and 5. a Structure of TmGalA mutant D387A in complex with intact 3a. b Structure of TmGalA in complex with hydrolyzed inhibitor 5. The maximum likelihood/σA weighted 2FobsFcalc electron density map is contoured at 1.2 sigma in a and 2 sigma in b. The catalytic residues D327 and D387 (or D387A) residues are shown. c, d Structure of TmGalA in complex with hydrolyzed inhibitor 5 illustrating active site residues that hydrogen bond with the inhibitor. The red sphere in c and gray sphere in d represent a water molecule

To obtain structural information regarding the enzyme-bound species, 3a was also soaked with wild-type TmGalA crystals. Following an overnight soak with 3a, the structure solved using data to 1.22 Å resolution revealed electron density consistent with the hydrolyzed form 5 in the active site of TmGalA (Fig. 5b). The interactions in the active site were essentially the same as for 3a (Fig. 5c), except for the addition of hydrogen bonds between the C2-OH with Arg383 and Asp387, and C1-OH with Asp387 and a water molecule. Thus, within the overnight timeframe 3a had been hydrolyzed with retention of stereochemistry at the pseudo-anomeric center, yielding a Michaelis complex of the reaction product. In an effort to observe the covalent intermediate derived from 3a, crystals were soaked for various time periods (from 5 s to 8 h) with 3a but did not yield any additional information. We therefore turned our attention to obtaining structural insights of TmGalA with 4, for which the covalent intermediate has a longer half-life (vide infra). Co-crystallization of the D387A mutant with 4 produced crystals that diffracted to 1.72 Å resolution. The active site contained electron density consistent with an intact molecule of 4 bound (Fig. 6a), which again displayed a 2H3 half chair conformation, and identical interactions to those described for the complex with 3a.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Structure of TmGalA in complex with 4. a Structure of TmGalA mutant D387A in complex with intact 4. b Structure of TmGalA in complex with 2-deoxy-2-fluorocarbagalactose fragment of 4 covalently bound to the nucleophile D327. c Structure of TmGalA in complex with hydrolyzed inhibitor 6. The maximum likelihood/σA weighted 2FobsFcalc electron density map is contoured at 1.5 sigma in all cases. The catalytic residues D327 and D387 (or D387A) residues are shown

To obtain structural information on the interactions made between 4 and wild-type TmGalA, crystals were grown and then soaked with the inhibitor for various periods of time. Following a 1 h soak with 4, the structure, solved using data to 1.42 Å resolution, revealed electron density in the active site of TmGalA consistent with the hydrolyzed carbasugar 6 (Fig. 6b) and active site interactions that were identical to those described above for the complex with 5. Thus, within this timeframe 4 had been hydrolyzed with retention of stereochemistry. However, crystals that were soaked for a much shorter period of time (~2 min) with 4 led to a structure, solved using data to 1.77 Å resolution, where the electron density showed the covalent adduct of the carbasugar with the nucleophile Asp327 of TmGalA (Fig. 6c). Of note, in these three structures (Fig. 6) there are no direct interactions between the ligand and any water molecule.

Structural insights from QM/MM simulations

Structures of the key stable states in the catalytic cycle for covalent inhibition of TmGalA by carbasugar 4 and the subsequent hydrolysis step were localized and optimized by means of hybrid QM/MM calculations (see Methods section). Snapshots of the active site corresponding to the Michaelis complex E:I, covalent intermediate E-I, and the Michaelis product complex E:P, obtained at density functional theory (DFT)/MM level are shown in Fig. 7. Following optimization of the enzyme-bound species on the reaction pathway, the conformations of the six-membered ring were classified using the Cremer–Pople ring puckering coordinates46 and the corresponding angles used in Hill and Reilly method47 (Supplementary Fig. 36 and Supplementary Table 4).

Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Structural snapshots of the active site of TmGalA. The enzyme's active site is shown in complex with: a 4 (or E:I); b 2-deoxy-2-fluorocarbagalactose fragment of 4 covalently bound to the nucleophile Asp327 (or E-I) and c hydrolyzed inhibitor 6 (or E:P). Structures were optimized at DFT/MM level of theory

Discussion

The minimal kinetic scheme for covalent inhibition of a GH by carbasugars is shown in Fig. 8. That is, the covalent labeling of TmGalA by 4 involves rapid formation of the covalent intermediate (k3), from the first-formed Michaelis complex (E:I), that is slowly hydrolyzed (k5) to regenerate active enzyme (Fig. 8a). The appropriate equations for the full catalytic cycle involving enzyme-catalyzed turnover of 4 are given in Fig. 8b. Moreover, when the glycosylated intermediate accumulates (k3 » k5) the kinetic expressions for the time-dependent loss of enzyme activity are given in Fig. 8c. Notably, the second-order rate constant for the catalyzed turnover of substrate (kcat/Km) is identical to the corresponding rate constants for time-dependent inactivation (kinact/Ki).

Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Scheme for the covalent inhibition of α-glycosidases by cyclohexene carbasugar analogs. a Mechanistic scheme showing individual rate constants. b Kinetic expressions for hydrolysis of inhibitor. c Kinetic expressions for the covalent labeling stopped-flow experiments

Considering that the two calculated second-order rate constants kcat/Km and kinact/Ki are similar (the value for kcat/Km assumes that the enzyme is 100% active, Table 1) and that no curvature is discernible in Supplementary Fig. 3b, we conclude that kcat ≈ k5 for turnover of 4 and likely for 3b as well. Thus the half-lives of the two covalent intermediates formed during the reactions of 3b and 4 with TmGalA are approximately 7 s and 20 min, respectively. Here the introduction of the 2-fluoro group retards hydrolysis of the covalent intermediate by a factor of about 150, whereas the second-order rate constant (kcat/Km) for formation of the covalent intermediate for the reaction of 3b is 400-fold larger than that for 4 (Table 1). That is, the fluorine substitution shows an approximate two-fold larger rate reducing effect on covalent labeling of the enzyme than on dealkylation of the resulting covalent intermediate. In contrast to the established utility of activated 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-β-d-glycosides as covalent inhibitors of β-glycosidases26, the corresponding 2,4-dinitrophenyl 2-deoxy-2-fluorogalactoside (7) is rapidly hydrolyzed by TmGalA through a reaction involving rate-determining glycosylation (Table 1, k3 < k5). Conversely, we found that cyclophellitol 8 is a slow time-dependent inactivator of TmGalA (Table 1, Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7) with no reactivation of the covalent enzyme intermediate over the course of 30 h (k5 ≈ 0).

Interestingly, these three distinct types of mechanism-based inhibitors exhibit completely different reactivities. First, our carbasugar analogs (3a, 3b, and 4) are covalent inhibitors that rapidly alkylate TmGalA to give a colavently bound intermediate that is slowly hydrolyzed to regenerate active enzyme. That is, our compounds have the potential to show temporal effects of GH activity and offer unique advantages as probe molecules in cells. Second, cyclophellitol analog 8 is an inactivator of TmGalA and thus other derivatives of this structural motif, such as the aziridines pioneered by Overkleeft44, can be used as chemical biology probes for enzyme localization and quantification, though not as modulators of enzyme activity. Lastly, the 2-deoxy-2-fluoroglycoside 7 proved to be a substrate for TmGalA and thus has little utility as a probe molecule.

The X-ray diffraction experiments provide an insight into the enzyme-bound species and afford three structures that define the reaction pathway for the two inversion events that occur at the pseudo-anomeric center. These data enable us to analyze the conformational changes that take place during the catalytic cycle for the reaction of our cyclohexene covalent inhibitors. Specifically, the formation of a covalent linkage between the pseudo-anomeric carbon of 4 and the nucleophile of TmGalA (Asp327) confirms that this reaction occurs with inversion of stereochemistry. Notably, the carbasugar ring binds in a flattened half-chair (2H3) conformation. An overlay of this structure with TmGalA in complex with intact 4 reveals that formation of the covalent bond between the pseudo-anomeric carbon (C1) and Asp327 necessitates significant movement of C1 (2.04 Å), C2, and C6 (the carbon atom in the position of the endocyclic oxygen) and to a lesser extent C3, C4, and C5 (Fig. 9a). We note that all interactions with active site residues for the carbasugar remain unchanged when compared to the complex with 6.

Fig. 9
Fig. 9

Superposition of TmGalA structures. a Structure of TmGalA mutant D387A in complex with intact 4 (cyan) and of wild-type TmGalA in complex with 2-deoxy-2-fluorocarbagalactose fragment of 4 covalently bound to the nucleophile Asp327 (yellow). b Structure of wild-type TmGalA in complex with hydrolyzed inhibitor 6 (pink) and of wild-type TmGalA in complex with 2-deoxy-2-fluorocarbagalactose fragment of 4 covalently bound to the nucleophile Asp327 (yellow). c Structure of TmGalA mutant D387A in complex with intact 4 (cyan) and of wild-type TmGalA in complex with hydrolyzed inhibitor 6 (pink)

Hydrolysis of the covalent intermediate gives the hydrolyzed carbasugar 6, which binds in a similar position and with the same conformation (2H3) as that observed for the carbasugar ring of the Michaelis complex with 4 (Fig. 9b). Specifically, a significant motion of C1, C2, and C6 returns the cyclohexene ring to close to its original position in the first Michaelis complex (Fig. 9c). In the complex with 6, the pseudo-anomeric carbon is displaced by 0.39 Å compared to its position in the complex of the D387A mutant with 4.

The DFT/MM calculations show that the carbasugar ring of 4 in the initial Michaelis complex (Fig. 7a) has a 2H3 half chair conformation, in agreement with the X-ray structure. This 2H3 half chair is slightly deformed towards a 4H31S3 conformation in the fragment of 4 covalently bound to the nucleophile Asp327 in the covalent intermediate (Fig. 7b). Of note, the DFT/MM optimized structures and the conformations deduced from the X-ray structure exhibit very similar puckering indices. Finally, the DFT/MM optimized structure of the Michaelis product complex (Fig. 7c) display a 2H3 half chair conformation while the X-ray structure is classified as lying between a 2H3 half chair and a 2E conformation. We extended our comparison between the QM/MM and X-ray structures to the analysis of the interatomic distances between the sugar and the residues of the active site (Supplementary Tables 6 and 7). Again, the agreement between experiments and calculations is remarkable with both techniques basically describing the same pattern of interactions. In addition, we computed the energies for the interactions that occur within the enzymatic active site between the inhibitor and the protein, an analysis that is based on the QM/MM interaction energies as shown in Supplementary Figs. 37 and 38. We found that interactions with Trp190, Asp220, and Lys325 stabilize all species along the reaction pathway. Also, Asp327 mediates a long-range interaction between Trp65 and Trp257 that stabilizes the leaving group fragment in the Michaelis complex E:I, an interaction that is likely perturbed in the TmGalA D327A mutant used in the crystallographic experiments. The total sugar–protein interaction energies computed from the QM/MM and the X-ray structures also confirm the agreement between the results obtained from these two complementary techniques (Supplementary Fig. 38).

In summary, we synthesized two cyclohexene carbasugars that mimic both galactose and 2-deoxy-2-fluorogalactose and have determined their kinetic parameters for turnover and inhibition with TmGalA. We show that our compounds are covalent inhibitors but importantly not covalent inactivators. As a result, our compounds inhibit GHs in a temporal fashion and enzyme activity returns when the covalent–enzyme intermediate is hydrolyzed. This is not the case for the cyclophellitol aziridine, cyclosulfate inactivators, and other inactivators that include the conduritol epoxides and most of the 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-β-glycosides. Therefore, our covalent inhibitors are functionally distinct to the listed covalent inactivators and in principal allow researchers to monitor cellular responses as enzyme activity decreases and then subsequently returns to baseline levels. In addition, we have provided structural insights into the conformations of the inhibitors at each step through the catalytic cycle derived from X-ray diffraction analysis as well as from theoretical QM/MM calculations. Together these findings provide a glimpse into the subtleties of GH catalysis, which will aid the exploration of GH mechanisms and direct development of carbocyclic covalent inhibitors and inactivators of GHs.

Methods

Protein expression and purification

A mutation, D387A, was introduced into the plasmid encoding TmGalA using the QuikChange Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using primers ForD387A, 5′-GATGAGGATAGGACCTGCTACTGCGCCGTTCTGGG-3′ and RevD387A, 5′-CCCAGAACGGCGCAGTAGCAGGTCCTATCCTCATC-3′. The plasmid encoding either α-galactosidase TmGalA or TmGalA with the D387A mutation was transformed into Escherichia coli BL-21(DE3) cells. TmGalA and the D387A mutant were expressed recombinantly by growing cultures at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani broth containing kanamycin (50 µg mL–1), until an optical density at 600 nm of approximately 0.6 absorbance units was reached. Overexpression was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside, and cells were cultured for a further 4 h at 37 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, re-suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, 20 mM imidazole, and lysed using a cell disruptor at 30 kpsi. TmGalA was applied to a nickel affinity chromatography column (5 mL HisTrap FF, GE Healthcare), washed with 10 column volumes of PBS, pH 7.4, and 50 mM imidazole, and eluted with 5 column volumes of PBS, pH 7.4, and 250 mM imidazole. TmGalA was buffer exchanged into 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl (HiPrep 26/10 desalting column, GE Healthcare) and then applied to a size-exclusion column (Superdex 200 16/60, GE Healthcare) for further purification. TmGalA was judged to be >95% pure by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Enzyme kinetics

Michaelis–Menten kinetic parameters for the hydrolysis of the cyclohexene carbasugar mimics of galactose (3), 2-deoxy-2-fluorogalactose (4) and the substrate 2,4-dinitrophenyl 2-deoxy-2-fluorogalactoside (7) were determined from a minimum of six initial rate measurements using a concentration range of at least Km/4 to 4 × Km. The progress of each reaction was monitored continuously for 5 min at 400 nm using a Cary 300 UV-vis spectrometer equipped with a temperature controller. Each 500 μL reaction mixture was prepared by addition of the appropriate volume of buffer (50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, T = 37 °C), substrate and enzyme. The rate versus substrate concentration data were fit to a Michaelis–Menten equation using a standard nonlinear least-squares computer program (Prism 7.0).

All covalent inhibition experiments with 4 were performed at 37 °C in 50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4 using an Applied Photophysics SX18 stopped-flow spectrophotometer, equipped with an external temperature controller. The stopped-flow spectrometer was used in the sequential double mixing mode, in which rapidly mixed enzyme and inhibitor 4 were incubated for various time intervals prior to rapid mixing of the enzyme/inhibitor solution with a buffered solution of 4-nitrophenyl α-d-galactopyranoside. The remaining enzyme activity was monitored at a wavelength of 400 nm. Pseudo first-order rate constants for loss of enzyme activity (kobs) at each inhibitor concentration were calculated by fitting the absorbance versus time data to a standard first-order rate equation using a nonlinear least squares routine in Prism 7.0. The kinetic parameters for inactivation by cyclophellitol 8 were determined using a classical dilution assay that involved preincubation of the enzyme with varying concentrations of inhibitor at 37 °C in 50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4 containing bovine serum albumin (BSA; 1 mg mL–1). The remaining enzyme activity was measured periodically by removing an aliquot (10 µL) and adding it to a pre-equilibrated solution (37 °C) containing 4-nitrophenyl α-D-galactopyranoside (250 µM) in HEPES buffer (50 mM, pH = 7.4, [BSA] = 1 mg mL–1). The first-order rate constants for inactivation (kobs) were determined by fitting the absorbance versus time data to a standard first-order rate equation. The first- and second-order rate constants (kinact and kinact/Ki) for inactivation were calculated by fitting the rate constant data versus the inactivator concentration to a standard Michaelis–Menten equation (Prism 7.0).

Crystallization

TmGalA (10 mg mL–1) was crystallized from 0.2 M MgSO4 and 20% (w/v) poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) 3350, and crystals were soaked in 30% (w/v) PEG 3350 containing 1 mM inhibitor 3a overnight or in 0.2 M MgSO4 and 30% (w/v) PEG 3350 containing a minute amount of inhibitor 4 added as powder for either 2 min or 1 h. The TmGalA mutant D387A (10 mg mL–1) was crystallized from 0.2 M MgSO4 and 20% (w/v) PEG 3350, and crystals were soaked in 30% (w/v) PEG 3350 containing 2 mM inhibitor 3a for 2 h. The TmGalA mutant D387A (10 mg mL–1) was incubated with ~1 mM inhibitor 4 and co-crystallized from 0.2 M MgSO4 and 20% (w/v) PEG 3350. All crystals were cryo-protected in 0.2 M MgSO4 and 30% (w/v) PEG 3350 prior to vitrification in liquid nitrogen.

Data collection and processing

X-ray diffraction data were collected at Diamond Light Source (DLS) (TmGalA mutant D387A in complex with 3a, beamline I04-1; TmGalA in complex with 5, beamline I04-1; TmGalA in covalent complex with fragment of 4, beamline I03) or the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (TmGalA mutant D387A in complex with 4, beamline ID29; TmGalA in complex with 6, beamline ID29). Data processing and refinement statistics are listed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. Diffraction data were processed using the Xia248 pipeline to run DIALS or XDS49 with Aimless50 from the CCP4 suite51. Molecular replacement was performed using MOLREP52 or Phaser53 with Protein Data Bank (PDB) entry 5M0X as the search model. Refinement was performed using REFMAC554 and manual model building was done using Coot55. Structures were validated using PDB_REDO56. Models for the inhibitors were built in JSME57 and the library was generated with PRODRG58.

Starting structure for theoretical simulations

The starting structure for the computer simulations of the inhibition and hydrolysis of inhibitor 4 by TmGalA) was the structure PDB code 5M1223. This structure corresponds to the structure of TmGalA in complex with an intact cyclopropyl carbasugar. The structure of the cyclopropyl carbasugar was modified to correspond to inhibitor 4. Missing atoms of Glu80 and Lys77 residues in X-ray structure were added using Accelrys Discovery Studio Visualizer v 4.559. The charges and parameters for inhibitor 4, obtained using the Antechamber software package along with a general AMBER force field (GAFF)60, are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Hydrogen atoms were added using the tLEAP61 module of Amber Tools program. The protonation state of titratable amino acids at pH 7.4 was determined using pKa results calculated using PROPKA ver. 3.162 available on PDB2PQR server63. The results indicate that Asp 387 and Glu 459 are present in their protonated form. Additionally, Glu224 was protonated to allow more favorable hydrogen bonding between neighboring Asp221 and inhibitor 4. Furthermore, His30 and His273 were protonated at the δ-position, while the rest of histidine residues were protonated at the ε-position. Neutralization of the total charge of the system was made by addition of 17 sodium cations (Na+) in the electrostatically most favorable positions. Next, the system was placed in orthorhombic box of TIP3P64 water molecules with size of 89 × 96 × 79 Å3. The geometries of the remaining water molecules were then optimized. The full system was formed by the protein (8453 atoms), the substrate (37 atoms in E:I, 23 atoms in E-I and 25 atoms in E:P), and 17,398 solvation water molecules (52,194 atoms).

MM MD simulations

After performing the A387D reverse mutation and setting up the model, NAMD software65 with the AMBER force field66 was used to run classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with the full solvated protein to equilibrate the system. In all, 10 ns of classical MD simulation (at temperature 310 K) was carried out in the NVT ensemble using the Langevin–Verlet algorithm to equilibrate the system at the E:I state, after heating from 0 to 310 K with 0.001 K temperature increment. Periodic boundary conditions using the particle mesh Ewald method were applied. In order to improve time of calculations, a cut-off for nonbonding interactions was applied using a smooth switching function with between 14.5 to 16 Å. The time dependence of root mean square deviation, temperature, total energy, and fluctuation of Cα positions during the MD simulation are plotted in Supplementary Figure 34, while a graphical representation of the B-factor values on the protein as well as its population analysis are reported in Supplementary Figure 35. The results indicate that the system can be considered equilibrated after 10 ns of the MD simulation. The structure of TmGalA appears to be quite rigid, with no dramatic fluctuations during MD simulations (the maximum value of B-factor was 7.4 Å2).

QM/MM optimizations

The last structure from the 10 ns MM MD simulation of E:I complex was used to run the QM/MM calculations using fDynamo library67 (Supplementary Figs. 39 and 40). In order to reduce time of calculations, positions of atoms presented beyond 20 Å from the inhibitor 4 were fixed. The QM subset of atoms were described first by the semiempirical AM1 Hamiltonian and later with the M06-2×68 hybrid functional and the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set, as described below. The protein and water molecules were described with the OPLS69 and TIP3P64 classical force fields, respectively. fDynamo library67 combined with Gaussian 0970 were used for all the QM/MM calculations. Structures of the corresponding stable states for the formation of the covalent intermediate between the inhibitor 4 and the protein and its hydrolysis, E:I, E-I, and E:P, were first optimized at AM1/MM level of theory. E-I and E:P were located from the previously equilibrated Michaelis complex, E:I, by modifying the interatomic distances d(OD2Asp327−C1), d(C1–OLg), d(OD2Asp387−HAsp387), and d(HAsp387−OLg). Thus, once the covalent bond between Asp327 and C1 atom of the sugar ring of inhibitor 4 was formed (intermediate E-I:Lg), the leaving group, Lg, was removed from the system and the cavity was filled with 5 water molecules. Next, 500 ps of QM/MM MD was run where the position of all atoms beyond distance of 20 Å from the substrate was fixed, thus generating the E-I intermediate after equilibration. Finally, the hydrolysis of this covalent intermediate and generation of compound 6 in the active site, E:P, was obtained by controlling the distances d(OWAT−C1), d(C1–OAsp327), d(OD2Asp387–HWAT) and d(HWAT–OAsp387). The structure was then fully optimized without constraints.

Both Asp327 and Asp387 together with full inhibitor 4 were included in the QM region to locate the covalent intermediate, E-I. The two aspartate residues, the remaining part of inhibitor and one water molecule were described at QM level in the generation of the hydrolyzed inhibitor in the cavity of the protein, E:P. To saturate the valence of the QM/MM frontier atoms, link atoms were placed in the frontier QM–MM bonds of the two aspartate residues, as depicted in Supplementary Figure 39. Finally, the three key structures (E:I, E-I, and E:P) were optimized at M06-2×/OPLS-AA/TIP3P level, using the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set for the treatment of the QM subset of atoms.

QM/MM MD simulations

After the structures of the stationary points, Michaelis complex (E:I), covalent intermediate (E-I), and products (E:P) were optimized, 100 ps AM1/MM MD simulations were done in order to obtain statistical representation of these structures. Subsequent analysis of geometries and interaction energies was done based on 1000 structures.

Puckering coordinates of the ring: Two different formalisms have been used to define the puckering of the ring in the three key states of the full conformational itinerary: the one based on the Cremer–Pople puckering coordinates46 and the angles used in the Hill and Reilly method47. The results are reported in Supplementary Table 4 and in Supplementary Figure 36.

Individual interaction energies by amino acid

The contributions of individual amino acid residues to the inhibitor stabilization were computed (in kcal mol–1) as an average of the total QM–MM interaction energy over 1000 structures generated along the AM1/MM MD simulations initiated from optimized structures for the different TmGalA structures: intact 4; 2-deoxy-2-fluorocarbagalactose fragment of 4 covalently bound to the nucleophile Asp327; and inhibitor 6 (see Supplementary Table 8 and Supplementary Figs. 37 and 38). Owing to the fact that this magnitude is directly obtained from the QM–MM interaction term of the full QM/MM Hamiltonian, only the atoms of compound 4 were included in the QM region (not Asp327 or Asp387) in the first case, E:I (Supplementary Fig 37A). For the E-I state (Supplementary Fig. 37B) and since the fragment of compound 4 was covalently bounded to the protein, only this fragment of the compound and the sidechain of Asp327 were included in the QM region. Finally, for the E:P state (Supplementary Fig. 37C), only the hydrolyzed inhibitor, compound 6, was included in the QM region.

The analysis of the interactions energies in the E-I state as plotted in Supplementary Figure 37B has to be carried out with caution due to the fact that Asp327 is covalently bound to the fragment of 4, and the interactions that appear in the figure can be established with this residue and not with the fragment of inhibitor 4. This is the case of Trp65 and Arg383, the repulsive interaction with Asp425, or the overestimated stabilizing interaction established with the positively charged Lys325. Nevertheless, as observed, the remaining favorable interactions are in agreement with the geometrical analysis that can be deduced from the inter-atomic distances (Supplementary Tables 57). Finally, when comparing the interactions of 6 (Supplementary Fig. 37C) with those established in 5, less intense interactions are measured but a similar pattern is detected.

Data availability

The accession codes for the structures reported in this article are: 6GTA, 6GVD, 6GWF, 6GWG, and 6GX8. All other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

  • 07 September 2018

    In the originally published version of this Article, the affiliation details for Tracey M. Gloster were incorrectly given as 'Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada'. The correct affiliation is 'Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9ST, UK'. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

  • 13 September 2018

    This Article was originally published without the accompanying Peer Review File. This file is now available in the HTML version of the Article; the PDF was correct from the time of publication.

References

  1. 1.

    Sinnott, M. Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry: Structure and Mechanism 2nd edn (RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2013).

  2. 2.

    Lombard, V., Ramulu, H. G., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M. & Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D490–D495 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Varki, A. Essentials of Glycobiology 3rd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2017).

  4. 4.

    Hohenschutz, L. D. et al. Castanospermine, a 1,6,7,8-tetrahydroxyoctahydroindolizine alkaloid, from seeds of Castanospermum australe. Phytochemistry 20, 811–814 (1981).

  5. 5.

    Berecibar, A., Grandjean, C. & Siriwardena, A. Synthesis and biological activity of natural aminocyclopentitol glycosidase inhibitors: mannostatins, trehazolin, allosamidins, and their analogues. Chem. Rev. 99, 779–844 (1999).

  6. 6.

    Inouye, S., Tsuruoka, T., Ito, T. & Niida, T. Structure and synthesis of nojirimycin. Tetrahedron 24, 2125–2144 (1968).

  7. 7.

    Breuer, H. W. M. Review of acarbose therapeutic strategies in the long-term treatment and in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 41, 421–440 (2003).

  8. 8.

    Kamerling, J. P., Vliegenthart, J. F. G., Schauer, R., Strecker, G. & Montreuil, J. Isolation and identification of 2-deoxy-2,3-dehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acid from urine of a patient with sialuria. Eur. J. Biochem. 56, 253–258 (1975).

  9. 9.

    Klumpp, K. & Graves, B. J. Optimization of small molecule drugs binding to highly polar target sites: Lessons from the discovery and development of neuraminidase inhibitors. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 6, 423–434 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Vocadlo, D. J. & Davies, G. J. Mechanistic insights into glycosidase chemistry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 12, 539–555 (2008).

  11. 11.

    Speciale, G., Thompson, A. J., Davies, G. J. & Williams, S. J. Dissecting conformational contributions to glycosidase catalysis and inhibition. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 28, 1–13 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Schmidt, D. D. et al. a-Glucosidase inhibitors: new complex oligosaccharides of microbial origin. Naturwissenschaften 64, 535–536 (1977).

  13. 13.

    Tanaka, K. S. E., Winters, G. C., Batchelor, R. J., Einstein, F. W. B. & Bennet, A. J. A new structural motif for the design of potent glucosidase inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 998–999 (2001).

  14. 14.

    Wolfenden, R. Degrees of difficulty of water-consuming reactions in the absence of enzymes. Chem. Rev. 106, 3379–3396 (2006).

  15. 15.

    Wolfenden, R., Lu, X. & Young, G. Spontaneous hydrolysis of glycosides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 6814–6815 (1998).

  16. 16.

    Lillelund, V. H., Jensen, H. H., Liang, X. & Bols, M. Recent developments of transition-state analogue glycosidase inhibitors of non-natural product origin. Chem. Rev. 102, 515–553 (2002).

  17. 17.

    Davies, G. J., Planas, A. & Rovira, C. Conformational analyses of the reaction coordinate of glycosidases. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 308–316 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Mhlongo, N. N., Skelton, A. A., Kruger, G., Soliman, M. E. S. & Williams, I. H. A critical survey of average distances between catalytic carboxyl groups in glycoside hydrolases. Proteins 82, 1747–1755 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Schwarz, J. C. P. Rules for conformation nomenclature for five- and six-membered rings in monosaccharides and their derivatives. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 505–508 (1973).

  20. 20.

    Sinnott, M. Comprehensive Biological Catalysis: A Mechanistic Reference (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).

  21. 21.

    Sinnott, M. L. Catalytic mechanisms of enzymic glycosyl transfer. Chem. Rev. 90, 1171–1202 (1990).

  22. 22.

    Shamsi Kazem Abadi, S. et al. New class of glycoside hydrolase mechanism-based covalent inhibitors: glycosylation transition state conformations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 10625–10628 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Adamson, C. et al. Structural snapshots for mechanism-based inactivation of a glycoside hydrolase by cyclopropyl-carbasugars. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 14978–14982 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Chakladar, S. et al. A mechanism-based inactivator of glycoside hydrolases involving formation of a transient non-classical carbocation. Nat. Commun. 5, 5590 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Danby, P. M. & Withers, S. G. Glycosyl cations versus allylic cations in spontaneous and enzymatic hydrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 10629–10632 (2017).

  26. 26.

    Rempel, B. P. & Withers, S. G. Covalent inhibitors of glycosidases and their applications in biochemistry and biology. Glycobiology 18, 570–586 (2008).

  27. 27.

    Breen, I. Z. et al. Competitive and covalent inhibitors of human lysosomal retaining exoglucosidases. eLS https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0027591 (2018).

  28. 28.

    Wang, Y. & Bennet, A. J. A potent bicyclic inhibitor of a family 27 a-galactosidase. Org. Biomol. Chem. 5, 1731–1738 (2007).

  29. 29.

    Vocadlo, D. J., Davies, G. J., Laine, R. & Withers, S. G. Catalysis by hen egg-white lysozyme proceeds via a covalent intermediate. Nature 412, 835–838 (2001).

  30. 30.

    Withers, S. G., Street, I. P., Bird, P. & Dolphin, D. H. 2-Deoxy-2-fluoroglucosides: a novel class of mechanism-based glucosidase inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 7530–7531 (1987).

  31. 31.

    Bergeron-Brlek, M., Teoh, T. & Britton, R. A tandem organocatalytic a-chlorination-aldol reaction that proceeds with dynamic kinetic resolution: a powerful tool for carbohydrate synthesis. Org. Lett. 15, 3554–3557 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Enders, D. & Grondal, C. Direct organocatalytic de novo synthesis of carbohydrates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 1210–1212 (2005).

  33. 33.

    Dias, E. L., Nguyen, S. T. & Grubbs, R. H. Well-defined ruthenium olefin metathesis catalysts: Mechanism and activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 3887–3897 (1997).

  34. 34.

    Scholl, M., Ding, S., Lee, C. W. & Grubbs, R. H. Synthesis and activity of a new generation of ruthenium-based olefin metathesis catalysts coordinated with 1,3-dimesityl-4,5-dihydroimidazol-2-ylidene ligands. Org. Lett. 1, 953–956 (1999).

  35. 35.

    Stewart, I. C. et al. Highly efficient ruthenium catalysts for the formation of tetrasubstituted olefins via ring-closing metathesis. Org. Lett. 9, 1589–1592 (2007).

  36. 36.

    Finnegan, D., Seigal, B. A. & Snapper, M. L. Preparation of aliphatic ketones through a ruthenium-catalyzed tandem cross-metathesis/allylic alcohol isomerization. Org. Lett. 8, 2603–2606 (2006).

  37. 37.

    Werner, H., Grunwald, C., Stuer, W. & Wolf, J. Deactivation of the Grubbs carbene complex [RuCl2(=CHPh)(PCY3)2] by allylic alcohols. Organometallics 22, 1558–1560 (2003).

  38. 38.

    Beeson, T. D. & MacMillan, D. W. C. Enantioselective organocatalytic alpha-fluorination of aldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 8826–8828 (2005).

  39. 39.

    Marigo, M., Fielenbach, D. I., Braunton, A., Kjoersgaard, A. & Jorgensen, K. A. Enantioselective formation of stereogenic carbon-fluorine centers by a simple catalytic method. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3703–3706 (2005).

  40. 40.

    Steiner, D. D., Mase, N. & Barbas, C. F. Direct asymmetric alpha-fluorination of aldehydes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3706–3710 (2005).

  41. 41.

    Blakemore, P. R., Cole, W. J., Kocienski, P. J. & Morley, A. A stereoselective synthesis of trans-1,2-disubstituted alkenes based on the condensation of aldehydes with metallated 1-phenyl-1H-tetrazol-5-yl sulfones. Synlett 1998, 26–28 (1998).

  42. 42.

    Khazaei, K., Yeung, J. H. F., Moore, M. M. & Bennet, A. J. Inhibitory efficiencies for mechanism-based inactivators of sialidases. Can. J. Chem. 93, 1207–1213 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Namchuk, M. N., McCarter, J. D., Becalski, A., Andrews, T. & Withers, S. G. The role of sugar substituents in glycoside hydrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 1270–1277 (2000).

  44. 44.

    Willems, L. I. et al. Potent and selective activity-based probes for GH27 Human retaining a-galactosidases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 11622–11625 (2014).

  45. 45.

    Comfort, D. A. et al. Biochemical analysis of Thermotoga maritima GH36 a-galactosidase (TmGalA) confirms the mechanistic commonality of Clan GH-D glycoside hydrolases. Biochemistry 46, 3319–3330 (2007).

  46. 46.

    Cremer, D. & Pople, J. A. General definition of ring puckering coordinates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 1354–1358 (1975).

  47. 47.

    Hill, A. D. & Reilly, P. J. Puckering coordinates of monocyclic rings by triangular decomposition. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47, 1031–1035 (2007).

  48. 48.

    Winter, G. xia2: an expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 186–190 (2010).

  49. 49.

    Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010).

  50. 50.

    Evans, P. R. & Murshudov, G. N. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr. D 69, 1204–1214 (2013).

  51. 51.

    Collaborative Computer Project Number 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 50, 760–763 (1994).

  52. 52.

    Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. MOLREP: an automated program for molecular replacement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 30, 1022–1025 (1997).

  53. 53.

    McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

  54. 54.

    Murshudov, G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 355–367 (2011).

  55. 55.

    Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

  56. 56.

    Joosten, R. P., Long, F., Murshudov, G. N. & Perrakis, A. The PDB_REDO server for macromolecular structure model optimization. IUCrJ 1, 213–220 (2014).

  57. 57.

    Bienfait B. & ErtlP. JSME: a free molecule editor in JavaScript. J. Cheminform. 5, 24 (2013).

  58. 58.

    Schuttelkopf, A. W. & van Aalten, D. M. F. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 1355–1363 (2004).

  59. 59.

    Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, Release 4.5 (Accelrys Software Inc., 2015).

  60. 60.

    Wang, J. M., Wang, W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 25, 247–260 (2006).

  61. 61.

    Case, D. A. et al. AMBER 12 (University of California, San Francisco, 2012).

  62. 62.

    Olsson, M. H. M., Sondergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M. & Jensen, J. H. PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pK apredictions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 525–537 (2011).

  63. 63.

    Dolinsky, T. J., Nielsen, J. E., McCammon, J. A. & Baker, N. A. PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W665–W667 (2004).

  64. 64.

    Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).

  65. 65.

    Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).

  66. 66.

    Duan, Y. et al. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 24, 1999–2012 (2003).

  67. 67.

    Field, M. J., Albe, M., Bret, C., Proust-De Martin, F. & Thomas, A. The Dynamo library for molecular simulations using hybrid quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical potentials. J. Comput. Chem. 21, 1088–1100 (2000).

  68. 68.

    Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. Density functionals with broad applicability in chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 157–167 (2008).

  69. 69.

    Pranata, J., Wierschke, S. G. & Jorgensen, W. L. OPLS potential functions for nucleotide bases - Relative association constants of hydrogen-bonded base-pairs in chloroform. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 2810–2819 (1991).

  70. 70.

    Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.02 (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada (AJB Discovery Grants: 121348–2012 & 2017–04910) was received. T.M.G. and V.O. are funded by a Wellcome Trust Career Development Fellowship, R.P. by Wellcome Trust ISSF, M.M. by a NSERC CGSD, M.F.-D. by a NSERC CGS-MSFSS and a GlycoNet Research Exchange Program, and R.B. by NSERC Discovery Grant and by a MSFHR Career Investigator Award. V.M. and K.Ś. thank the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad and FEDER funds (project CTQ2015-66223-C2) and a Juan de la Cierva – Incorporación (ref. IJCI-2016-27503) contract, respectively, and Universitat Jaume I (project UJI·B2017-31). We thank the staff at DLS and ESRF synchrotrons for assistance with data collection.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada

    • Weiwu Ren
    • , Marco Farren-Dai
    • , Oluwafemi Akintola
    • , Jason Draper
    • , Michael Meanwell
    • , Saswati Chakladar
    • , Robert Britton
    •  & Andrew J. Bennet
  2. Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9ST, UK

    • Robert Pengelly
    • , Verena Oehler
    •  & Tracey M. Gloster
  3. Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada

    • Saeideh Shamsi Kazem Abadi
  4. Department de Química Física i Analítica, Universitat Jaume I, 12071, Castellón, Spain

    • Katarzyna Świderek
    •  & Vicent Moliner

Authors

  1. Search for Weiwu Ren in:

  2. Search for Robert Pengelly in:

  3. Search for Marco Farren-Dai in:

  4. Search for Saeideh Shamsi Kazem Abadi in:

  5. Search for Verena Oehler in:

  6. Search for Oluwafemi Akintola in:

  7. Search for Jason Draper in:

  8. Search for Michael Meanwell in:

  9. Search for Saswati Chakladar in:

  10. Search for Katarzyna Świderek in:

  11. Search for Vicent Moliner in:

  12. Search for Robert Britton in:

  13. Search for Tracey M. Gloster in:

  14. Search for Andrew J. Bennet in:

Contributions

R.B. conceived of the de novo synthetic route. W.R., J.D. and M.M. assisted in planning and execution of the synthesis of covalent inhibitors. W.R. synthesized the 2-deoxy-2-fluorogalactoside and the cyclophellitol analog. R.P. and V.O. performed single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments. R.P. and T.M.G. analyzed X-ray diffraction data. S.S.K.A. and O.A. performed the kinetic experiments, S.C. made compound 3a. K.Ś. and V.M. designed the computational studies and analyzed the results. K.Ś. and M.F.-D. carried out the calculations. A.J.B. designed the covalent inhibitors and the overall study. A.J.B., T.M.G., R.B. and V.M. contributed to writing the paper. W.R. assisted with editing the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Robert Britton or Tracey M. Gloster or Andrew J. Bennet.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05702-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.