Review Article | Open | Published:

Microbial tryptophan catabolites in health and disease

Nature Communicationsvolume 9, Article number: 3294 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Accumulating evidence implicates metabolites produced by gut microbes as crucial mediators of diet-induced host-microbial cross-talk. Here, we review emerging data suggesting that microbial tryptophan catabolites resulting from proteolysis are influencing host health. These metabolites are suggested to activate the immune system through binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), enhance the intestinal epithelial barrier, stimulate gastrointestinal motility, as well as secretion of gut hormones, exert anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative or toxic effects in systemic circulation, and putatively modulate gut microbial composition. Tryptophan catabolites thus affect various physiological processes and may contribute to intestinal and systemic homeostasis in health and disease.

Introduction

The diverse and dynamic microbial community of the human gastrointestinal tract plays a vital role in health and nutrition of the host1. A mutualistic relationship between host and gut microbiota relies on complex molecular cross-talk, which is fundamental for intestinal homeostasis. Although recent advances in characterizing the composition and function of the gut microbiota have yielded numerous new findings about the role of the gut microbiota in human health, only few microbiota-generated metabolites affecting host physiology have been identified, but these include short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) originating from bacterial degradation of dietary fiber2, secondary bile acids originating from bacterial conversion of bile acids in the colon3, and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), which is a product of microbial-host co-metabolism of nutrients such as phosphatidylcholine, choline, and L-carnitine, present in high-fat foods4,5. The role of bacterial metabolites originating from proteolysis on host physiology has however received only scarce attention. Although bacterial protein degradation products in general have been considered to be deleterious for the host6, recent data suggests that tryptophan catabolites generated by the gut microbiota are important contributors to intestinal homeostasis. Here, we review recent discoveries related to microbial tryptophan catabolites and discuss future efforts to explore their potential role in mediating microbe-host interactions (Fig. 1). Since available studies linking tryptophan catabolites with health are typically associative or originate from mouse models, more research is needed to provide tangible connections between tryptophan catabolites and human health.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Mechanisms of action of microbial tryptophan catabolites on host physiology. Degradation of dietary proteins leads to the release of tryptophan, which is converted into various catabolites by the gut microbiota. The tryptophan catabolites include indole, tryptamine, indoleethanol (IE), indolepropionic acid (IPA), indolelactic acid (ILA), indoleacetic acid (IAA), skatole, indolealdehyde (IAld) and indoleacrylic acid (IA) and may affect host physiology in numerous ways. Indole, IPA and IA affect mucosal homeostasis by decreased intestinal permeability possibly mediated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR). Indole induces the release of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) in enteroendocrine L-cells. GLP-1 is known to suppress appetite, insulin secretion and to slow gastric emptying. Several tryptophan catabolites act on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) found in intestinal immune cells and thereby alter innate and adaptive immune responses in a ligand-specific fashion (e.g. IAld induces increased production of interleukin-22 (IL-22) via AHR activation). Tryptamine induces the release of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin) by enterochromaffin cells. 5-HT stimulates gastrointestinal motility by acting on enteric nervous system neurons. Tryptophan catabolites are absorbed through the intestinal epithelium and enter the bloodstream where some (e.g. IPA, IE, IA) have anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory effects, whereas indoxyl-sulfate (IS), which is produced in the liver from indole by the actions of CYP2E1 and sulfotransferases (SULT), has cytotoxic effects in high concentrations

Bacterial tryptophan catabolism in the gut

Tryptophan is an essential amino acid for humans, and is supplied by dietary protein (Box 1). Although the majority of ingested protein is digested and absorbed in the small intestine7, dependent on intake, significant amounts of proteins and amino acids (6–18 g/day) may reach the colon8, where a range of commensal bacteria degrade them. Bacterial protein catabolism increases with increased protein intake, carbohydrate depletion in the colon, increased colonic pH and prolonged colonic transit time9,10,11,12. The gradual depletion of carbohydrate substrates occurring from the proximal to the distal colon causes a shift in bacterial catabolism from saccharolytic to proteolytic fermentation10. In agreement herewith, concentrations of phenolic compounds from degradation of aromatic amino acids in the human gut content are more than fourfold higher in the distal colon than in the proximal colon12. Bacterial proteolytic specialists are reported to have lower growth potential than generalists and saccharolytic/lipolytic specialists, suggesting that proteolytic specialists thrive when the ecological pressure for fast growth is decreased13. However, the degradation of tryptophan appears not to be limited to proteolytic specialists or to the distal colon as for example the Lactobacilli catabolize tryptophan in the stomach and ileum of mice14. Several bacterial species have been reported to be able to convert tryptophan into indole and indole derivatives (Table 1). Already in 1897, tryptophan was found to be converted into indole by Bacillus coli (now Escherichia coli) and Asiatic cholera (now Vibrio cholerae)15. Later, the production of indole has been used as a diagnostic marker to distinguish E. coli from other enteric bacteria. Because indole has been known for more than 100 years, numerous indole-producing species have been identified as described in a previous review16; therefore these are not discussed in details here. Briefly, indole formation occurs via the action of the enzyme tryptophanase (TnaA), which is expressed in many Gram-negative, as well as Gram-positive bacterial species including Escherichia coli, Clostridium spp. and Bacteroides spp.12,16,17,18. More recently, a number of studies have shown that gut microbial species produce a variety of tryptophan catabolites via various other metabolic pathways (Fig. 2). For example, Clostridium sporogenes converts tryptophan into tryptamine, indolelactic acid (ILA) and indolepropionic acid (IPA)19,20,21. Likewise, Peptostreptococcus spp. including P. russellii, P. anaerobius and P. stomatis are known to convert tryptophan to indoleacrylic acid (IA) and IPA, possibly due to the presence of the phenyllactate dehydratase gene cluster (fldAIBC) on the chromosome of these species22. Indeed, a homologue of this cluster is found to be responsible for the conversion of tryptophan into ILA and IPA in C. sporogenes21. Furthermore, homologue gene-clusters were found in Clostridium cadaveris, Clostridium botulinum and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius21 in agreement with their capability to produce IPA17,21,22. Another group of bacteria capable of converting tryptophan is Lactobacilli. Lactobacillus spp. convert tryptophan to indolealdehyde (IAld) and ILA via the aromatic amino acid aminotransferase (ArAT) and an indolelactic acid dehydrogenase (ILDH)14,23,24. Ruminococcus gnavus converts tryptophan into tryptamine by the action of a tryptophan decarboxylase enzyme20. Several Bacteroides species, as well as Clostridium bartlettii have been reported to produce ILA and indoleacetic acid (IAA)25, whereas Bifidobacterium spp. have been reported to produce ILA25,26. Finally, the common intestinal metabolite 3-methylindole (skatole), which have been extensively studied as the cause of off-flavor in pork, is generated by decarboxylation of IAA by Bacteroides spp. and Clostridium spp.12,17,25,27. Although several species are able to metabolize tryptophan in vitro (Table 1), studies linking the abundances of bacterial species with concentrations of tryptophan catabolites in humans are still needed to identify the main tryptophan catabolite producers in the human gut. Indole and IAA are detected in human fecal samples of healthy adults at mean concentrations of 2.6 mM28 and 5 µM29, respectively. However, the concentrations of other tryptophan catabolites (IPA, ILA, IAld, tryptamine and IA) in the human gut have to our knowledge not been assessed. In serum, mean concentrations in healthy adults have previously reported for IAA (1.3 µM), IPA (1.0 µM), and ILA (0.15 µM)30, while a recent study reported a mean serum IPA concentration of 50 nM31. Additionally, the mean concentrations of microbial tryptophan catabolites in the urine of pregnant women were recently reported for IAA (61 µM), methyl-IAA (8 µM), tryptamine (9 µM), and methyl-IPA (0.5 µM)32. Despite differences in the reported concentrations, these studies suggest that in adults, indole is the most abundant microbial tryptophan catabolite, followed by IAA and IPA. The availability of methods for determination of concentrations of microbial tryptophan catabolites in biological specimens is however currently limited28,32 and better quantitative analytical methods targeting a larger variety of microbial tryptophan metabolites are needed. Such methods will enable the comparison of metabolite concentrations across biological compartments (i.e. feces, blood and urine) and between different human populations.

Table 1 Gut bacterial species reported to produce tryptophan catabolites
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Microbial generation of tryptophan catabolites in the human gut. Overview of the different ways microbes degrade tryptophan in the human gut. The metabolites that are most often found in the human gut are colored in green. Dashed lines represent pathways where no enzymes have been identified

Mechanisms of action of microbial tryptophan catabolites

A growing body of literature suggests that tryptophan catabolites generated by the gut microbiota are important signaling molecules in microbial communities, as well as in host-microbial cross-talk, and may contribute to intestinal and systemic homeostasis (Fig. 1).

Microbial benefits of tryptophan metabolism

While the interaction of intestinal bacterial tryptophan metabolites with the host has received an increasing amount of attention in recent years as reviewed in the following sections, knowledge about the benefit of tryptophan metabolism to the intestinal microbes themselves is limited. Tryptophan has a multitude of metabolic functions, for example, it is incorporated into polypeptide chains of bacterial enzymes and serves as a precursor of the cofactor NAD33. However, most important in the rich intestinal environment is probably the bacterial need for maintenance of redox homeostasis. In the gut, the bacteria generate ATP from fermentation of carbohydrates, which typically involves oxidative steps. Compensating reductions must thus be carried out. As recently reviewed for food fermentation involving lactic acid bacteria34, microbes apply a multitude of different reactions in order to find ultimate electron acceptors allowing them to balance their fermentative metabolism in the absence of oxygen. Similarly in the gut, indole pyruvate generated by transamination of tryptophan may thus be applied as electron acceptor and reduced to ILA by action of the ILA dehydrogenase (Fig. 2). Such fine-tuning reactions might thus equilibrate the redox potential and give microbes a competitive advantage in the gut. Additionally, bacterial cross-feeding on degradation products of aromatic amino acids is likely to occur in the human colon35, and may provide specific bacteria with a growth advantage in the highly competitive gut ecosystem.

Tryptophan catabolites as signals and antimicrobial agents

Indole is well-described as an intercellular signal molecule that appears to be important in microbial communities by affecting spore formation, plasmid stability, drug resistance, biofilm formation, and virulence16. Similarly, indoleethanol (IE, tryptophol) has been identified as a quorum sensing molecule in fungi36. This metabolite also exerts antimicrobial activity towards Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica and Lactobacillus plantarum37,38. Moreover, IE inhibits bacteriophage replication in a thermophilic bacterium, Geobacillus sp. E26339, virus replication in shrimps40, and proliferation of parasitic protozoa41. Also ILA is reported to have antifungal activity against Penicillium strains42 and anti-bacterial activity against E. coli and B. cereus43. Furthermore, there is evidence suggesting that indoles affect the survival of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans44,45. Collectively, these diverse examples suggest that indoles play a role as modulators of microbial gut communities across kingdoms including bacteria, fungi and viruses. Yet, whether the tryptophan catabolites modulate also the microbial community of the mammalian gut remains unexplored.

Tryptophan catabolites as aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands

In recent years it has become evident that bacterial tryptophan catabolites including tryptamine, skatole, IAA, IA, IAld, and ILA are acting as ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)14,23,46,47. AHR is a transcription factor widely expressed by cells in the immune system48 and a number of studies have demonstrated that AHR activation alters innate and adaptive immune responses in a ligand-specific fashion49,50,51. Importantly, the affinities of tryptophan catabolites for the AHR differ between mice and humans47 and even within laboratory mouse strains, where four alleles encoding different forms of the AHR are known to exist52. Whereas the rodent AHR has been found to bind the exogenous ligand 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD or dioxin) with approximately 10-fold higher affinity than the human AHR53, recent studies suggest that the human AHR has higher affinity than the mouse AHR for a number of tryptophan-derived ligands47. Together, these studies reveal that rodent AHR and human AHR exhibit different ligand selectivity, which is very important to consider given that predictions about AHR ligand-receptor interactions in humans are often based on rodent studies. Furthermore, in intestinal cell line models, the tryptophan catabolites have been found to be either agonists or antagonists depending on their molecular structure46,54. Recent studies have underlined that indole-induced AHR activation may be one way that bacteria contribute to mucosal homeostasis. Lactobacillus spp. were found to regulate interleukin (IL)-22 mucosal homeostasis via IAld-mediated activation of AHR, and thereby to protect mice against mucosal candidiasis14. In addition, treatment of mice with three Lactobacillus strains capable of metabolizing tryptophan attenuated intestinal inflammation via AHR activation, as the effects were abrogated in the presence of an AHR antagonist29. Also Lactobacillus bulgaricus OLL1181 was found to activate the AHR pathway and inhibit colitis in a mouse model55. Further deciphering the mechanisms, a recent study in mice revealed that Lactobacillus reuteri via IAld and ILA activates AHR, which reprogram intraepithelial CD4+ T helper cells into immunoregulatory T cells (CD4+ CD8αα double-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes)23. Additionally, ILA was found to inhibit mouse polarization of T helper 17 (TH17) cells in vitro24. Together these studies suggest that tryptophan catabolites via AHR affect the differentiation of naive CD4+ T helper cells into regulatory T (Treg) cells and TH17 cells. The TH17/Treg balance plays an important role in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases56. Thus, the discovery of tryptophan catabolites as AHR ligands may provide new insight about how microbial metabolites affect the immune system in the gut, as well as in systemic circulation. In addition, indoles provided by commensal bacteria have been found to improve the health of a range of different organisms including Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and mice in an AHR-dependent way57. This raises the intriguing possibility that tryptophan catabolites via AHR may reduce frailty and improve health also in humans.

Tryptophan catabolites and intestinal barrier functions

Both in vitro and in vivo studies have indicated that indole enhances intestinal epithelial barrier functions by increasing expression of genes involved in maintenance of epithelial cell structure and function58,59. Moreover, also IPA was found to regulate intestinal barrier function in vivo in mice by acting as a ligand for the xenobiotic sensor, pregnane X receptor (PXR), particularly in the presence of indole60. Activation of PXR has been shown to protect the barrier function in a mouse model of colitis61. In addition, IPA was found to reduce intestinal permeability in mice fed a high fat diet62. Further emphasizing the link between IPA and intestinal barrier function, a recent study colonized germ-free mice with either a wild-type or fldC mutant C. sporogenes (IPA production in C. sporogenes require an intact fldC gene), and showed that the fldC-colonized mice exhibited significantly increased permeability to FITC-dextran compared to their wild-type-colonized counterparts, concordant with depleted levels of luminal IPA21. Also IA has recently been shown to promote intestinal epithelial barrier function and mitigate inflammatory responses in mice by promoting goblet cell differentiation and mucus production, possibly mediated by AHR activation22. Collectively, these studies suggest that tryptophan catabolites signal through PXR and AHR to fortify the intestinal epithelial barrier function.

Tryptophan catabolites and gut hormone secretion

Indole has been seen to function as a signaling molecule, which is able to modulate the secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) from immortalized and primary mouse colonic enteroendocrine L cells63. GLP-1 plays a critical role in stimulating insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells, suppressing appetite and slowing gastric emptying64. Thus, intestinal levels of indole may this way affect appetite. Higher serum concentrations of IPA have recently been associated with reduced prevalence of type 2 diabetes and better insulin secretion and sensitivity65, which adds to the evidence pointing towards a putative role of indoles in modulating glucose metabolism, possibly via L cell-induced secretion of GLP-1. In line with this, a recent study found that rats fed a diet containing IPA had significantly lower fasting blood glucose level compared to rats fed a control diet66. Although the sensing of indole derivatives by L-cells remains elusive, it seems plausible that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are responsive to a range of nutrients and other food components67, may also be responsive to microbial metabolites including tryptophan catabolites as reviewed elsewhere68. Nonetheless, these studies call for more research to be done to elucidate how tryptophan catabolites may modulate the enteroendocrine system and metabolic homeostasis including glucose metabolism.

Tryptamine and gastrointestinal motility

Tryptamine, a tryptophan catabolite produced by C. sporogenes and Ruminococcus gnavus20, is a β-arylamine neurotransmitter, which may influence gut health. In the gut, tryptamine is known to induce the release of the neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin) by enterochromaffin cells69, which are located at the mucosal surfaces70. 5-HT stimulates gastrointestinal motility by acting on enteric nervous system neurons70. In addition, using an Ussing chamber with a segment of proximal-mid murine colon mucosa, it was found that tryptamine itself induced a significant change in short circuit current, confirming that it can affect ion secretion in intestinal epithelial cells20, which plays an important role in gastrointestinal motility. Thus, tryptamine may act as a signaling molecule that affects intestinal transit time, which is strongly associated with the gut microbial composition, diversity and metabolism in humans10,71. Whether bacterial production of tryptamine plays a role in the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome, which often manifests as either chronic diarrhea or chronic constipation72, currently remains unanswered. One species of particular interest could be R. gnavus, which is over-represented in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)73,74, produces tryptamine20 and utilizes mucin75, suggesting that it thrives in close proximity with the enterochromaffin cells. Indeed, R. gnavus mono-associated mice showed induction of several genes involved in tryptophan metabolism as compared to germ-free mice76. As R. gnavus is a common species of the gut microbiota found in around 90% of adults77 and infants78, the ability of this species to produce tryptamine may influence human health.

Tryptophan catabolites in the systemic circulation

Tryptophan catabolites may also systemically affect host physiology as they are absorbed through the intestinal epithelium and enter the bloodstream19 before they are excreted in the urine10,32. Association analyses between the human gut microbiome and ex vivo cytokine responses in whole blood upon microbial stimulations pinpointed a negative association between interferon gamma (IFNγ) production and bacterial genes responsible for the conversion of tryptophan into IE79, suggesting that IE has anti-inflammatory properties. Previous studies have suggested IPA as a scavenger of hydroxyl radicals80, and a protector against oxidative damage in different tissues81,82,83. However a recent study found that IA, but not IPA, had anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects in LPS-activated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) expressed as reduced IL-6 and IL-1β secretion and activation of the NRF2-ARE pathway22, a pathway suggested to be a therapeutic target towards prevention of neurodegenerative disorders84 and IBD85. Similarly, IAA and tryptamine attenuated pro-inflammatory cytokine responses in murine macrophage cultures and hepatocyte cultures in an AHR-dependent way86, suggesting that microbial tryptophan catabolites could influence inflammatory responses in the liver as well. The effects of tryptophan catabolites on production of cytokines may depend on AHR activation, since it has been shown that AHR signaling modifies Toll-like receptor (TLR)-regulated responses in human dendritic cells87. Adding to the complexity, it has been reported that AHR-mediated gene induction may be enhanced by SCFA88.

Although indoles in general appear to be beneficial, an exception to this is indoxyl sulfate (IS), which is a host-microbial co-metabolite generated from indole in the liver by the actions of cytochrome P450 enzymes, including CYP2E1, and sulfotransferase (SULT)89. This metabolite is typically characterized as a uremic toxin that accumulates in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with serum concentrations around 100 µM compared to 2 µM in healthy adults90,91. IS is a potent agonist for AHR92, which induces tubulointerstitial fibrosis93, glomerular sclerosis94, vascular endothelial cell dysfunction95 and oxidative stress in endothelial cells96. IS is undetectable in germ-free mice, as the production of IS depends on commensal bacteria19. Thus, manipulation of the gut microbial tryptophan catabolism may be one strategy to lower circulating levels of IS, as recently demonstrated in gnotobiotic and conventional mice18. Whether diversion of intestinal tryptophan catabolism away from IS will be beneficial in renal diseases needs to be determined in future studies.

Tryptophan catabolites in health and diseases

In light of the effects of tryptophan catabolites on various physiological processes, we discuss three areas in which tryptophan catabolites may play a vital role.

Early life

In light of the great changes of the composition of the gut microbiota occurring during the first years of life97,98, which to a large extent is driven by changes in diet99,100, it is highly likely that the gut microbial tryptophan metabolism also changes in this period. Indeed, indole-producing E. coli are known to be abundant in the first week of life101, whereafter Bifidobacterium species, which are reported to be able to produce ILA26, start dominating the gut microbiome of breastfed infants100,101,102. Later, as complementary diet is introduced, bacterial genera including tryptophan catabolizing species such as Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus and Clostridium become abundant in the gut of infants99. Combined with the fact that tryptophan catabolites via AHR activation modulate and educate the immune system as reviewed above, this makes microbial tryptophan catabolites in early life a very relevant area of research, which has not received much attention. In mice, AHR activation is required for the postnatal expansion of intestinal lymphoid cells expressing the transcription factor RORγt and for the formation of intestinal lymphoid follicles, which are immune system components involved in maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and resistance to infections103. Down these lines, it was recently shown that maternally transmitted microbially derived AHR ligands shape the early immune system of mouse offspring by increasing intestinal group 3 innate lymphoid cells and F4/80(+)CD11c(+) mononuclear cells104. Moreover, delivery mode and gestational age of infants are reported to affect urinary levels of metabolites belonging to the tryptophan pathway105. A recent study revealed that dietary protein depletion compromised adaptive immune responses and altered tryptophan amino acid homeostasis in human infant microbiota-transplanted pigs infected with human rotavirus106, and another study in neonatal pigs showed that formula feeding compared to sow feeding reduced enterochomaffin cell number and shifted tryptophan metabolism from serotonin to tryptamine107. Collectively, these studies suggest that factors such as maternal microbiota and diet, delivery mode, gestational age, infant microbiota and diet influence tryptophan metabolism in early life, which may be essential for the development of intestinal barrier functions and immune system.

Inflammatory bowel disease

During the last decade, IBD has been one of the most studied human conditions linked to the gut microbiota. Interestingly, serum levels of tryptophan are significantly lower in IBD patients than in healthy controls, and is particularly reduced in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) as compared to patients suffering from ulcerative colitis (UC)108. In addition, plasma tryptophan levels are reported to be reduced in CD109,110, whereas fecal tryptophan levels are elevated compared to healthy individuals111. These observations suggest that changes in tryptophan metabolism are involved in the etiology of IBD. In line with this, a tryptophan free diet increased susceptibility to DSS-induced inflammation in mice112. Importantly, not only tryptophan appears to play a role in the etiology of IBD. Also depletion of intestinal tryptophan catabolites may affect the severity of IBD, as it was recently shown that IBD patients have reduced fecal concentrations of the AHR agonist IAA29. Consistent with this, AHR is downregulated in the intestinal tissue of patients with IBD113 and AHR activation protects humanized mice against colitis by induction of regulatory T cells114. Furthermore, IPA is selectively diminished in circulating serum from human subjects with active colitis compared to healthy individuals31, and oral administration of indole, as well as IPA is found to ameliorate colonic inflammation in mice31,115. Gut microbial tryptophan metabolism thus holds promise as a therapeutic target in patients with IBD, provided that future research will untangle the relations between the individual tryptophan catabolites and the propensity of inflammation.

Neurological diseases

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative autoimmune disorder. Astrocytes, a population of cells in the central nervous system (CNS), are thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of MS. A recent study revealed that microbial catabolites of dietary tryptophan combined with type I interferon signaling activates AHR signaling in astrocytes and suppress CNS inflammation in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) animal model of MS116. In addition, they found decreased circulating levels of AHR agonists in individuals with MS, suggesting that imbalances in the uptake, production, or degradation of AHR agonists may contribute to the pathogenesis of MS and other autoimmune disorders116. In line herewith, Laquinimod, an oral drug that is currently being evaluated for the treatment of MS and Huntington’s disease (HD), a rare neurodegenerative disease, was recently shown to have anti-inflammatory effects in EAE mediated by AHR117. Interestingly, plasma levels of IPA were significantly lower in subjects with HD compared to healthy controls30. Thus, targeting the gut microbial tryptophan metabolism by modulating the endogenous gut microbiota or changing the diet may represent alternative strategies to prevent and treat MS and other neurological diseases.

Future directions

Although several bacteria capable of producing tryptophan catabolites have been identified (Table 1), the main contributors in the human gut remain to a large extent unknown despite the large amount of fecal metagenomics data available. As we forge ahead to determine the contributors, we propose to combine profiling of microbes (metagenomics) with quantification of tryptophan catabolites (metabolomics) in stool samples from human cohorts. This will allow us to identify important associations between tryptophan catabolites and microbial species, which can be verified using classic in vitro cultivation and metabolic phenotyping. Since tryptophan catabolites are also produced by other microorganisms than bacteria, it is imperative that we move away from profiling only the bacterial community and start exploring the human gut microbiota across kingdoms. Once we identify the relevant microorganisms and tryptophan catabolites in the gut of infants, adults and elderly, we must identify the exact role of each tryptophan catabolite in host (patho)physiology and unravel their precise mechanisms in the different segments and cells of the intestine, as well as in the different tissues by use of animal models and by conducting human interventions (Fig. 3). In addition, there is a need to identify the receptors recognizing the metabolites. Furthermore, the AHR species-dependent ligand preferences for tryptophan catabolites seen when comparing different mammals22,47 underline the importance of studying tryptophan catabolite interactions in human cells and not solely in murine models. Currently, the connections between tryptophan catabolites and human health remain rather tentative, with most data being associative or originating from mouse models. Therefore, a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of tryptophan catabolites and their functional implications in the different stages of life from birth to old age, from health to disease is needed. This may crucially extend our understanding of intestinal host-microbial cross-talk in health and disease.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Proposed strategy to identify tryptophan-catabolite-producing microbes and to investigate their role in human health and disease. Although a number of tryptophan-catabolite producing microbes have currently been identified (Table 1), no studies have until now taken their starting point from human data, meaning that we do not know the main bacterial producers of tryptophan catabolites in the human gut. Therefore, we suggest to start from human studies and combine metagenomics and metabolomics data in order to pinpoint the most relevant and potential tryptophan-catabolite producing microbes. Based on these associations, selected target species should be cultured in the laboratory and their in vitro production of tryptophan catabolites should be assessed by growth experiments and metabolic profiling. Combined with knowledge about their genomes, this will allow the identification of genes responsible for generation of tryptophan catabolites. Knocking out identified genes of interest will subsequently allow for confirmation of the function of the gene and for testing the importance of the particular gene in relevant animal models as recently exemplified21. Colonizing mice with a given mutant strain and the wild-type counterpart will furthermore allow the investigation of modes of action of the tryptophan catabolites on e.g., intestinal immune cells, intestinal barrier function, intestinal hormone secretion, the inherent gut microbiota, as well as on the immune cells in systemic circulation. Together, this will provide new insights about the role of tryptophan catabolites, and lead to a better understanding of the gut microbiota in human health and disease

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Tremaroli, V. & Bäckhed, F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489, 242–249 (2012).

  2. 2.

    Koh, A., De Vadder, F., Kovatcheva-Datchary, P. & Bäckhed, F. From Dietary Fiber to Host Physiology: Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Key Bacterial Metabolites. Cell 165, 1332–1345 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Wahlström, A., Sayin, S. I., Marschall, H. U. & Bäckhed, F. Intestinal Crosstalk between Bile Acids and Microbiota and Its Impact on Host Metabolism. Cell. Metab. 24, 41–50 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Koeth, R. A. et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat. Med. 19, 576–585 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Wang, Z. et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature 472, 57–63 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Nyangale, E. P., Mottram, D. S. & Gibson, G. R. Gut microbial activity, implications for health and disease: the potential role of metabolite analysis. J. Proteome Res. 11, 5573–5585 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Evenepoel, P. et al. Amount and fate of egg protein escaping assimilation in the small intestine of humans. Am. J. Physiol. 277, G935–G943 (1999).

  8. 8.

    Gibson, J. A., Sladen, G. E. & Dawson, A. M. Protein absorption and ammonia production: the effects of dietary protein and removal of the colon. Br. J. Nutr. 35, 61–65 (1976).

  9. 9.

    Macfarlane, G. T., Cummings, J. H., Macfarlane, S. & Gibson, G. R. Influence of retention time on degradation of pancreatic enzymes by human colonic bacteria grown in a 3-stage continuous culture system. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 67, 520–527 (1989).

  10. 10.

    Roager, H. M. et al. Colonic transit time is related to bacterial metabolism and mucosal turnover in the gut. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16093 (2016). This study demonstrates how a long colonic transit time in humans cause a shift in bacterial catabolism from saccharolytic to proteolytic fermentation.

  11. 11.

    Geypens, B. et al. Influence of dietary protein supplements on the formation of bacterial metabolites in the colon. Gut 41, 70–76 (1997).

  12. 12.

    Smith, E. A. & Macfarlane, G. T. Enumeration of human colonic bacteria producing phenolic and indolic compounds: effects of pH, carbohydrate availability and retention time on dissimilatory aromatic amino acid metabolism. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81, 288–302 (1996).

  13. 13.

    Vieira-Silva, S. et al. Species–function relationships shape ecological properties of the human gut microbiome. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16088 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Zelante, T. et al. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity 39, 372–385 (2013). This study shows for the first time how tryptophan catabolites protect against fungus infections and intestinal inflammation.

  15. 15.

    Smith, T. A modification of the method for determining the production of indol by bacteria. J. Exp. Med. 2, 543–547 (1897).

  16. 16.

    Lee, J. H. & Lee, J. Indole as an intercellular signal in microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34, 426–444 (2010).

  17. 17.

    Elsden, S. R., Hilton, M. G. & Waller, J. M. The end products of the metabolism of aromatic amino acids by clostridia. Arch. Microbiol. 107, 283–288 (1976).

  18. 18.

    Devlin, A. S. et al. Modulation of a Circulating Uremic Solute via Rational Genetic Manipulation of the Gut Microbiota. Cell. Host. Microbe 20, 709–715 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Wikoff, W. R. et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3698–3703 (2009).

  20. 20.

    Williams, B. B. et al. Discovery and characterization of gut microbiota decarboxylases that can produce the neurotransmitter tryptamine. Cell. Host. Microbe 16, 495–503 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Dodd, D. et al. A gut bacterial pathway metabolizes aromatic amino acids into nine circulating metabolites. Nature 551, 648–652 (2017). An elegant study combining genetics and metabolic profiling to characterise a pathway of Clostridium sporogenes that generates aromatic amino acid metabolites.

  22. 22.

    Wlodarska, M. et al. Indoleacrylic Acid Produced by Commensal Peptostreptococcus Species Suppresses Inflammation. Cell. Host. Microbe 22, 25–37.e6 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Cervantes-Barragan, L. et al. Lactobacillus reuteri induces gut intraepithelial CD4(+)CD8αα(+) T cells. Science 357, 806–810 (2017). This study reveals that Lactobacillus reuteri via production of indole derivatives, activates AHR which leads to reprogramming of intraepithelial CD4+ T cells into immunoregulatory T cells.

  24. 24.

    Wilck, N. et al. Salt-responsive gut commensal modulates TH17 axis and disease. Nature 551, 585–589 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Russell, W. R. et al. Major phenylpropanoid-derived metabolites in the human gut can arise from microbial fermentation of protein. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 57, 523–535 (2013). Systematic screening of the ability of colonic bacterial species ferment aromatic amino acids including tryptophan catabolites.

  26. 26.

    Aragozzini, F., Ferrari, A., Pacini, N. & Gualandris, R. Indole-3-lactic acid as a tryptophan metabolite produced by Bifidobacterium spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 38, 544–546 (1979).

  27. 27.

    Whitehead, T. R., Price, N. P., Drake, H. L. & Cotta, M. A. Catabolic Pathway for the Production of Skatole and Indoleacetic Acid by the Acetogen Clostridium drakei, Clostridium scatologenes, and Swine Manure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 1950–1953 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Darkoh, C., Chappell, C., Gonzales, C. & Okhuysen, P. A rapid and specific method for the detection of indole in complex biological samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 8093–8097 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Lamas, B. et al. CARD9 impacts colitis by altering gut microbiota metabolism of tryptophan into aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands. Nat. Med. 22, 598–605 (2016). The study provides evidence that defects in expression of factors involved in innate immunity, such as CARD9, can alter the microbial tryptophan catabolite production, which can then modify the host immune response.

  30. 30.

    Rosas, H. D. et al. A systems-level ‘misunderstanding’: the plasma metabolome in Huntington’s disease. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2, 756–768 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Alexeev, E. E. et al. Microbiota-derived indole metabolites promote human and murine intestinal homeostasis through regulation of interleukin-10 receptor. Am. J. Pathol. 188, 1183–1194 (2018).

  32. 32.

    Pavlova, T. et al. Urinary intermediates of tryptophan as indicators of the gut microbial metabolism. Anal. Chim. Acta 987, 72–80 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Magni, G., Amici, A., Emanuelli, M., Raffaelli, N. & Ruggieri, S. Enzymology of NAD+ synthesis. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 73, 135–182 (1999).

  34. 34.

    Hansen, E. B. Redox reactions in food fermentations. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 19, 98–103 (2018).

  35. 35.

    Van der Meulen, R., Camu, N., Van Vooren, T., Heymans, C. & De Vuyst, L. In vitro kinetic analysis of carbohydrate and aromatic amino acid metabolism of different members of the human colon. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 124, 27–33 (2008).

  36. 36.

    Chen, H. & Fink, G. R. Feedback control of morphogenesis in fungi by aromatic alcohols. Genes Dev. 20, 1150–1161 (2006).

  37. 37.

    Elleuch, L. et al. Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from a New Terrestrial Streptomyces sp. TN262. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 162, 579–593 (2010).

  38. 38.

    Landete, J. M., Rodríguez, H., De las Rivas, B. & Muñoz, R. High-added-value antioxidants obtained from the degradation of wine phenolics by Lactobacillus plantarum. J. Food Prot. 70, 2670–2675 (2007).

  39. 39.

    Jin, M., Xu, C. & Zhang, X. The effect of tryptophol on the bacteriophage infection in high-temperature environment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99, 8101–8111 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Zhu, F. & Jin, M. The effects of a thermophile metabolite, tryptophol, upon protecting shrimp against white spot syndrome virus. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 47, 777–781 (2015).

  41. 41.

    Orhan, I., Şener, B., Kaiser, M., Brun, R. & Tasdemir, D. Inhibitory Activity of Marine Sponge-Derived Natural Products against Parasitic Protozoa. Mar. Drugs 8, 47–58 (2010).

  42. 42.

    Honoré, A. H. et al. Metabolic footprinting for investigation of antifungal properties of Lactobacillus paracasei. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 408, 83–96 (2016).

  43. 43.

    Narayanan, T. K. & Rao, G. R. Beta-indoleethanol and beta-indolelactic acid production by Candida species: their antibacterial and autoantibiotic action. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 9, 375–380 (1976).

  44. 44.

    Lee, J.-H. et al. Indole-associated predator-prey interactions between the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 1776–1790 (2017).

  45. 45.

    Bommarius, B. et al. A Family of Indoles Regulate Virulence and Shiga Toxin Production in Pathogenic E. coli. PLoS ONE 8, e54456 (2013).

  46. 46.

    Cheng, Y. et al. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activity of Tryptophan Metabolites in Young Adult Mouse Colonocytes. Drug Metab. Dispos. 43, 1526–1543 (2015).

  47. 47.

    Hubbard, T. D. et al. Adaptation of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor to sense microbiota-derived indoles. Sci. Rep. 5, 12689 (2015). This paper shows adaptation of human AHR to bind indole as a selective human AHR agonist, suggesting a degree of evolutionary adaption by the AHR.

  48. 48.

    Stockinger, B., Di Meglio, P., Gialitakis, M. & Duarte, J. H. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: multitasking in the immune system. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32, 403–432 (2014).

  49. 49.

    Quintana, F. J. et al. Control of T(reg) and T(H)17 cell differentiation by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature 453, 65–71 (2008).

  50. 50.

    Bessede, A. et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor control of a disease tolerance defence pathway. Nature 511, 184–190 (2014).

  51. 51.

    Gandhi, R. et al. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor induces human type 1 regulatory T cell-like and Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 11, 846–853 (2010).

  52. 52.

    Poland, A., Palen, D. & Glover, E. Analysis of the four alleles of the murine aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 46, 915–921 (1994).

  53. 53.

    Ramadoss, P. & Perdew, G. H. Use of 2-Azido-3-[125I]iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin as a Probe to Determine the Relative Ligand Affinity of Human versus Mouse Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Cultured Cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 66, 129–136 (2004).

  54. 54.

    Jin, U.-H. et al. Microbiome-Derived Tryptophan Metabolites and Their Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Dependent Agonist and Antagonist Activities. Mol. Pharmacol. 85, 777–788 (2014).

  55. 55.

    Takamura, T. et al. Lactobacillus bulgaricus OLL1181 activates the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway and inhibits colitis. Immunol. Cell Biol. 89, 817–822 (2011).

  56. 56.

    Noack, M. & Miossec, P. Th17 and regulatory T cell balance in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 13, 668–677 (2014).

  57. 57.

    Sonowal, R. et al. Indoles from commensal bacteria extend healthspan. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7506–E7515 (2017).

  58. 58.

    Bansal, T., Alaniz, R. C., Wood, T. K. & Jayaraman, A. The bacterial signal indole increases epithelial-cell tight-junction resistance and attenuates indicators of inflammation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 228–233 (2010). The first study to propose that indole strengthens epithelial cell-barrier properties and attenuate inflammation.

  59. 59.

    Shimada, Y. et al. Commensal bacteria-dependent indole production enhances epithelial barrier function in the colon. PLoS ONE 8, e80604 (2013).

  60. 60.

    Venkatesh, M. et al. Symbiotic Bacterial Metabolites Regulate Gastrointestinal Barrier Function via the Xenobiotic Sensor PXR and Toll-like Receptor 4. Immunity 41, 296–310 (2014).

  61. 61.

    Garg, A. et al. Pregnane X Receptor Activation Attenuates Inflammation-Associated Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Dysfunction by Inhibiting Cytokine-Induced Myosin Light-Chain Kinase Expression and c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase 1/2 Activation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 359, 91–101 (2016).

  62. 62.

    Jennis, M. et al. Microbiota-derived tryptophan indoles increase after gastric bypass surgery and reduce intestinal permeability in vitro and in vivo. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 30, e13178 (2017).

  63. 63.

    Chimerel, C. et al. Bacterial metabolite indole modulates incretin secretion from intestinal enteroendocrine L cells. Cell Rep. 9, 1202–1208 (2014). This paper demonstrates that GLP-1 secretion from enteroendocrine L cells is modulated by exposure to indole at concentrations similar to those found in the human large intestine.

  64. 64.

    Holst, J. J. The Physiology of Glucagon-like Peptide 1. Physiol. Rev. 87, 1409–1439 (2007).

  65. 65.

    de Mello, V. D. et al. Indolepropionic acid and novel lipid metabolites are associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Sci. Rep. 7, 46337 (2017).

  66. 66.

    Abildgaard, A., Elfving, B., Hokland, M., Wegener, G. & Lund, S. The microbial metabolite indole-3-propionic acid improves glucose metabolism in rats, but does not affect behaviour. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1080/13813455.2017.1398262 (2017).

  67. 67.

    Reimann, F., Tolhurst, G. & Gribble, F. M. G-Protein-Coupled Receptors in Intestinal Chemosensation. Cell. Metab. 15, 421–431 (2012).

  68. 68.

    Husted, A. S., Trauelsen, M., Rudenko, O., Hjorth, S. A. & Schwartz, T. W. GPCR-Mediated Signaling of Metabolites. Cell. Metab. 25, 777–796 (2017).

  69. 69.

    Takaki, M., Mawe, G. M., Barasch, J. M., Gershon, M. D. & Gershon, M. D. Physiological responses of guinea-pig myenteric neurons secondary to the release of endogenous serotonin by tryptamine. Neuroscience 16, 223–240 (1985).

  70. 70.

    Mawe, G. M. & Hoffman, J. M. Serotonin signalling in the gut—functions, dysfunctions and therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 473–486 (2013).

  71. 71.

    Vandeputte, D. et al. Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut 65, 57–62 (2015).

  72. 72.

    Lacy, B. E., Chey, W. D. & Lembo, A. J. New and Emerging Treatment Options for Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. (N. Y) 11, 1–19 (2015).

  73. 73.

    Png, C. W. et al. Mucolytic bacteria with increased prevalence in IBD mucosa augment in vitro utilization of mucin by other bacteria. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105, 2420–2428 (2010).

  74. 74.

    Joossens, M. et al. Dysbiosis of the faecal microbiota in patients with Crohn’s disease and their unaffected relatives. Gut 60, 631–637 (2011).

  75. 75.

    Tailford, L. E. et al. Discovery of intramolecular trans-sialidases in human gut microbiota suggests novel mechanisms of mucosal adaptation. Nat. Commun. 6, 7624 (2015).

  76. 76.

    Hoffmann, T. W. et al. Microorganisms linked to inflammatory bowel disease-associated dysbiosis differentially impact host physiology in gnotobiotic mice. Isme. J. 10, 460–477 (2016).

  77. 77.

    Qin, J. et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59–65 (2010).

  78. 78.

    Sagheddu, V., Patrone, V., Miragoli, F., Puglisi, E. & Morelli, L. Infant Early Gut Colonization by Lachnospiraceae: High Frequency of Ruminococcus gnavus. Front. Pediatr. 4, 57 (2016).

  79. 79.

    Schirmer, M. et al. Linking the Human Gut Microbiome to Inflammatory Cytokine Production Capacity. Cell 167, 1125–1136.e8 (2016).

  80. 80.

    Chyan, Y. J. et al. Potent neuroprotective properties against the Alzheimer beta-amyloid by an endogenous melatonin-related indole structure, indole-3-propionic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21937–21942 (1999).

  81. 81.

    Hwang, I. K. et al. Indole-3-propionic acid attenuates neuronal damage and oxidative stress in the ischemic hippocampus. J. Neurosci. Res. 87, 2126–2137 (2009).

  82. 82.

    Karbownik, M., Stasiak, M., Zasada, K., Zygmunt, A. & Lewinski, A. Comparison of potential protective effects of melatonin, indole-3-propionic acid, and propylthiouracil against lipid peroxidation caused by potassium bromate in the thyroid gland. J. Cell. Biochem. 95, 131–138 (2005).

  83. 83.

    Karbownik, M., Stasiak, M., Zygmunt, A., Zasada, K. & Lewiński, A. Protective effects of melatonin and indole-3-propionic acid against lipid peroxidation, caused by potassium bromate in the rat kidney. Cell. Biochem. Funct. 24, 483–489 (2006).

  84. 84.

    Joshi, G. & Johnson, J. A. The Nrf2-ARE pathway: a valuable therapeutic target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Recent Pat. CNS Drug Discov. 7, 218–229 (2012).

  85. 85.

    Lu, M.-C. et al. An inhibitor of the Keap1-Nrf2 protein-protein interaction protects NCM460 colonic cells and alleviates experimental colitis. Sci. Rep. 6, 26585 (2016).

  86. 86.

    Krishnan, S. et al. Gut Microbiota-Derived Tryptophan Metabolites Modulate Inflammatory Response in Hepatocytes and Macrophages. Cell Rep. 23, 1099–1111 (2018).

  87. 87.

    Kado, S. et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling modifies Toll-like receptor-regulated responses in human dendritic cells. Arch. Toxicol. 91, 2209–2221 (2016).

  88. 88.

    Jin, U.-H. et al. Short Chain Fatty Acids Enhance Aryl Hydrocarbon (Ah) Responsiveness in Mouse Colonocytes and Caco-2 Human Colon Cancer Cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 10163 (2017).

  89. 89.

    Banoglu, E., Jha, G. G. & King, R. S. Hepatic microsomal metabolism of indole to indoxyl, a precursor of indoxyl sulfate. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 26, 235–240 (2001).

  90. 90.

    Wu, I.-W. et al. p-Cresyl sulphate and indoxyl sulphate predict progression of chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 938–947 (2011).

  91. 91.

    Kim, H. Y. et al. Indoxyl sulfate (IS)-mediated immune dysfunction provokes endothelial damage in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Sci. Rep. 7, 3057 (2017).

  92. 92.

    Schroeder, J. C. et al. The Uremic Toxin 3-Indoxyl Sulfate Is a Potent Endogenous Agonist for the Human Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor. Biochemistry 49, 393–400 (2010).

  93. 93.

    Motojima, M., Hosokawa, A., Yamato, H., Muraki, T. & Yoshioka, T. Uremic toxins of organic anions up-regulate PAI-1 expression by induction of NF-κB and free radical in proximal tubular cells. Kidney Int. 63, 1671–1680 (2003).

  94. 94.

    Niwa, T. & Ise, M. Indoxyl sulfate, a circulating uremic toxin, stimulates the progression of glomerular sclerosis. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 124, 96–104 (1994).

  95. 95.

    Dou, L. et al. The uremic solutes p-cresol and indoxyl sulfate inhibit endothelial proliferation and wound repair. Kidney Int. 65, 442–451 (2004).

  96. 96.

    Dou, L. et al. The uremic solute indoxyl sulfate induces oxidative stress in endothelial cells. J. Thromb. Haemost. 5, 1302–1308 (2007).

  97. 97.

    Yatsunenko, T. et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222–227 (2012).

  98. 98.

    Bergström, A. et al. Establishment of intestinal microbiota during early life: A longitudinal, explorative study of a large cohort of Danish infants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 2889–2900 (2014).

  99. 99.

    Laursen, M. F. et al. Infant Gut Microbiota Development Is Driven by Transition to Family Foods Independent of Maternal Obesity. mSphere 1, e00069–15 (2016).

  100. 100.

    Laursen, M. F., Bahl, M. I., Michaelsen, K. F. & Licht, T. R. First Foods and Gut Microbes. Front. Microbiol. 8, 356 (2017).

  101. 101.

    Bäckhed, F. et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell. Host. Microbe 17, 690–703 (2015).

  102. 102.

    Bazanella, M. et al. Randomized controlled trial on the impact of early-life intervention with bifidobacteria on the healthy infant fecal microbiota and metabolome. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 106, 1274–1286 (2017).

  103. 103.

    Kiss, E. A. et al. Natural Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Ligands Control Organogenesis of Intestinal Lymphoid Follicles. Sci. (80-.). 334, 1561–1565 (2011).

  104. 104.

    Gomez de Aguero, M. et al. The maternal microbiota drives early postnatal innate immune development. Sci. (80-.). 351, 1296–1302 (2016). First study to suggest that tryptophan catabolites may shape the composition and function of early postnatal immunity.

  105. 105.

    Hill, C. J. et al. Evolution of gut microbiota composition from birth to 24 weeks in the INFANTMET Cohort. Microbiome 5, 21 (2017).

  106. 106.

    Fischer, D. D. et al. Protein Malnutrition Alters Tryptophan and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Homeostasis and Adaptive Immune Responses in Human Rotavirus-Infected Gnotobiotic Pigs with Human Infant Fecal Microbiota Transplant. Clin. Vaccin. Immunol. 24, e00172–17 (2017).

  107. 107.

    Saraf, M. K. et al. Formula diet driven microbiota shifts tryptophan metabolism from serotonin to tryptamine in neonatal porcine colon. Microbiome 5, 77 (2017).

  108. 108.

    Nikolaus, S. et al. Increased Tryptophan Metabolism is Associated With Activity of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastroenterology 153, 1504–1516.e2 (2017).

  109. 109.

    Hisamatsu, T. et al. Novel, Objective, Multivariate Biomarkers Composed of Plasma Amino Acid Profiles for the Diagnosis and Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. PLoS ONE 7, e31131 (2012).

  110. 110.

    Gupta, N. K. et al. Serum analysis of tryptophan catabolism pathway: correlation with Crohn’s disease activity. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 18, 1214–1220 (2012).

  111. 111.

    Jansson, J. et al. Metabolomics reveals metabolic biomarkers of Crohn’s disease. PLoS ONE 4, e6386 (2009).

  112. 112.

    Hashimoto, T. et al. ACE2 links amino acid malnutrition to microbial ecology and intestinal inflammation. Nature 487, 477–481 (2012).

  113. 113.

    Monteleone, I. et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor-induced signals up-regulate IL-22 production and inhibit inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology 141, 237–248 (2011). 248.e1.

  114. 114.

    Goettel, J. A. et al. AHR Activation Is Protective against Colitis Driven by T Cells in Humanized Mice. Cell Rep. 17, 1318–1329 (2016).

  115. 115.

    Whitfield-Cargile, C. M. et al. The microbiota-derived metabolite indole decreases mucosal inflammation and injury in a murine model of NSAID enteropathy. Gut Microbes 7, 246–261 (2016).

  116. 116.

    Rothhammer, V. et al. Type I interferons and microbial metabolites of tryptophan modulate astrocyte activity and central nervous system inflammation via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nat. Med. 22, 586–597 (2016). The study provides evidence that tryptophan metabolites modulate the activity of central nervous system resident cells and suppress neuroinflammation.

  117. 117.

    Kaye, J. et al. Laquinimod arrests experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by activating the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, E6145–E6152 (2016).

  118. 118.

    Honeyfield, D. C. & Carlson, J. R. Effect of Indoleacetic Acid and Related Indoles on Lactobacillus sp. Strain 11201 Growth, Indoleacetic Acid Catabolism, and 3-Methylindole Formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 1373–1377 (1990).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Martin Frederik Laursen and Egon Bech Hansen for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Innovation Fund Denmark (grant no. 11-116163/0603-00487B; Center for Gut, Grain and Greens).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, DK-1958, Frederiksberg, Denmark

    • Henrik M. Roager
  2. National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark

    • Henrik M. Roager
    •  & Tine R. Licht

Authors

  1. Search for Henrik M. Roager in:

  2. Search for Tine R. Licht in:

Contributions

H.M.R. drafted the text and figures with inputs from T.R.L. Both authors revised and finalized the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Henrik M. Roager or Tine R. Licht.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05470-4

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.