Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Platinum-bearing chromite layers are caused by pressure reduction during magma ascent


Platinum-bearing chromitites in mafic-ultramafic intrusions such as the Bushveld Complex are key repositories of strategically important metals for human society. Basaltic melts saturated in chromite alone are crucial to their generation, but the origin of such melts is controversial. One concept holds that they are produced by processes operating within the magma chamber, whereas another argues that melts entering the chamber were already saturated in chromite. Here we address the problem by examining the pressure-related changes in the topology of a Mg2SiO4–CaAl2Si2O8–SiO2–MgCr2O4 quaternary system and by thermodynamic modelling of crystallisation sequences of basaltic melts at 1–10 kbar pressures. We show that basaltic melts located adjacent to a so-called chromite topological trough in deep-seated reservoirs become saturated in chromite alone upon their ascent towards the Earth’s surface and subsequent cooling in shallow-level chambers. Large volumes of these chromite-only-saturated melts replenishing these chambers are responsible for monomineralic layers of massive chromitites with associated platinum-group elements.


The origin of platinum-bearing chromitites (up to 90 vol.% chromite), which occur as monomineralic layers up to a few metres thick and hundreds of kilometres in length within mafic-ultramafic intrusions (Fig. 1), has been under intense scientific scrutiny since the early twentieth century1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. This persistent interest is driven not only by the challenge of resolving the thermodynamic reasons for their formation2,3,4,5,8, but also by their exceptional economic significance—they host over 90% of Earth’s resources of chromium, an important industrial element1 for improving the physical and chemical properties of steels. Some massive chromitites are also highly enriched in platinum-group elements1,8, which are industrially used to break down toxic exhaust gases into relatively benign species. Historically, much of this attention has been focused on the Bushveld Complex—the largest mafic magmatic body on Earth—which hosts most of the world’s resources of chromite and the platinum-group elements. Despite its enormous size, this complex is still merely the uppermost portion of the much larger transcrustal magmatic system that transferred mantle-derived melts through several staging reservoirs towards the Earth’s surface14. There is a growing understanding that the solution to the origin of massive chromitites in the Bushveld Complex and other layered intrusions, must be sought in the mechanisms via which magma is transferred through the crust8,9,10,11,12.

Fig. 1

Massive chromitite layers of the Bushveld Complex, South Africa. a LG6, LG6a and LG6b massive chromitites exposed in an open pit mine working from the Cameron section, Eastern Bushveld Complex. Person for scale is ~1.85 m. b A closer view of the LG6a massive chromitite within the same open pit mine working as above (Cameron section, Eastern Bushveld Complex). The hammer for scale has a length of about 50 cm

It is widely believed that massive chromitites are best explained by crystallisation from mantle-derived basaltic melts, in which chromite was the only liquidus phase. The major challenge is, however, to explain how exactly the Earth’s transcrustal magmatic system generates melts capable of forming chromite deposits. Traditionally, melts directly derived from the mantle or deep-seated magma reservoirs are not thought to be capable of being saturated in chromite alone. This is because olivine is a residual phase in the mantle and its stability field expands with decreasing pressure. Therefore, ascent of mantle-derived magmas towards the Earth’s surface will ensure their saturation in olivine (±chromite), rather than chromite alone. For this reason, various mechanisms: including magma mixing; an increase in total pressure or fO2 of the magma; or contamination by crustal rocks2,3,4,5,6,7 have been proposed to generate melts saturated in chromite alone within shallow crustal magma chambers. Recently, an intriguing alternative hypothesis has been developed. This attributes generation of the voluminous Bushveld chromitite layers to crystallisation from mantle-derived magmas, which became saturated with chromite alone prior to their emplacement into the chamber8. Although this novel idea is strongly supported by textural and field observations from other mafic-ultramafic-layered intrusions and sills9,10,11,12,15,16, the exact reason for saturation of mantle-derived magmas in chromite alone, has not yet been identified.

Here, we present an original solution to this challenging problem using three interrelated approaches—phase equilibria, thermodynamic modelling and experimental data. We show that chromite alone saturation of basaltic magmas is likely due to a previously unrecognised topological feature of liquidus phase equilibria—a so-called chromite topological trough. Basaltic melts located alongside this trough in deep-seated reservoirs may become saturated in chromite alone upon their transcrustal ascent towards the Earth’s surface. This occurs due to expansion of the plagioclase stability volume as the lithostatic pressure decreases, which shifts the chromite topological trough, forcing these basaltic melts into the chromite stability volume. These melts would crystallise pure chromite on cooling forming massive chromitites in layered intrusions. This discovery dramatically changes our understanding of the petrogenesis of world-class chromitite and platinum deposits, while introducing a novel approach for interpreting other magmatic deposits.


Graphical phase equilibria

Ascent of basaltic melts from a mantle source region results in lithostatic pressure reduction, which may substantially affect the liquidus phase equilibria. These changes have marked consequences on melt crystallisation sequences, as illustrated here by pressure-induced modification of the quaternary system Mg2SiO4–CaAl2Si2O8–SiO2–MgCr2O4 (Fig. 2a). In this diagram, we have identified one crucial feature that has so far not been recognised. This is the chromite topological trough that is located between the orthopyroxene/olivine and plagioclase stability volumes (Fig. 2b). The trough results from a substantial decrease in the proportion of cotectically crystallising chromite, as one moves from invariant points in ternary systems (1.4–1.5 wt. and 0.3 wt.%) towards quaternary ones within a tetrahedron (0.12–0.18 wt.%). With decreasing lithostatic pressure, the plagioclase volume expands at the expense of the orthopyroxene and partly olivine volumes17, thus shifting the chromite topological trough away from the plagioclase apex (Fig. 3a). We consider the effect of this change in the liquidus topology for initially orthopyroxene-saturated melts. The most primitive melts, located far away from the trough, will remain orthopyroxene-saturated at both high and lower pressures (Fig. 3b, c, path from A to B). However, some evolved orthopyroxene-saturated melts, which at high pressures are located close to the trough (Fig. 3b, path from B to C) and all orthopyroxene-chromite melts located on the trough (Fig. 3b, path from C to D), will at lower pressures be forced into the trough, becoming saturated in chromite only (Fig. 3c). Similar behaviour is expected for olivine- or olivine-chromite saturated melts. Thus, mantle-derived basaltic melts located alongside the chromite topological trough may become saturated in chromite alone during transcrustal transfer towards the Earth’s surface.

Fig. 2

The chromite topological trough in basaltic systems. a Phase relations in a quaternary system Mg2SiO4–CaAl2Si2O8–SiO2–MgCr2O4 at 1 atm. The stability volume of chromite, represented by a complete solid solution series between MgAl2O4-spinel and MgCr2O4-spinel, occupies almost the entire interior of the diagram. It is continuous between the top apex of the tetrahedron and the small triangular liquidus field of MgAl2O4-spinel on the basal ternary diagram Mg2SiO4–CaAl2Si2O8–SiO2. b A close-up of the diagram showing the chromite topological trough between stability volumes of orthopyroxene/olivine and plagioclase. The trough plays a decisive role in the generation of basaltic melts saturated in chromite alone (Fig. 3). The figure is modified from ref. 13, with the topology being slightly distorted for illustration purposes. Here and in all subsequent figures, cotectic and reaction lines are indicated by one or two arrows, respectively. Here and in all subsequent figures and text: An, anorthite; Fo, forsterite; Opx, orthopyroxene; Ol, olivine; Pl, plagioclase; Cpx, clinopyroxene; Chr, Cr-spinel; Qtz, quartz; Grt, garnet

Fig. 3

A liquidus phase diagram illustrating the mechanism via which melts become saturated in chromite alone by pressure reduction. a Expansion of the plagioclase stability volume with decreasing pressure results in a shift of the chromite topological trough away from the plagioclase apex. b A high pressure section through the chromite topological trough and related stability volumes showing a range of basaltic melts saturated in orthopyroxene (from A to C) and orthopyroxene + chromite (from C to D). c The same section at lower pressures indicates that the most primitive melts (from A to B) will remain orthopyroxene-saturated over the entire pressure range. However, the less primitive orthopyroxene-saturated melts (from B to C) and all orthopyroxene + chromite-saturated melts (from C to D) will move into the chromite topological trough at lower pressure (e.g. ~0–3 kbar). Note that in this process the chromite stability field does not expand but merely changes its position. The location of the section (b, c) is indicated by a rectangle in a, this rectangular section is not a temperature-composition binary diagram

Thermodynamic modelling

We have tested the above prediction of a graphical approach by thermodynamic modelling, using the alphaMELTS software18,19 (Methods), with a focus on generation of chromitites from the Critical Zone (CZ) of the Bushveld Complex8. These rocks are inferred to have parental melts that are pyroxenitic to noritic in composition20,21, which are produced by contamination and fractional crystallisation of primary ultramafic magmas in staging chambers22,23. Starting from one of these compositions (B2 melt21, Table 1) we incrementally and iteratively modified its major element contents (Methods) to explore whether isobaric crystallisation of the obtained basaltic melts may identify a pressure interval within which chromite is the sole liquidus phase. The modelled basaltic liquid that provides the best insights into the crystallisation sequence within a pressure interval from 10 to 1 kbar is listed in Table 1. This basaltic liquid (MgO = 6.68 wt.%; Cr2O3 = 0.10 wt.%) is saturated in both orthopyroxene and chromite along the pressure interval from 10 to 6 kbar (Fig. 4) but has chromite as the first liquidus phase, followed by orthopyroxene at pressure lower than 6 kbar. With decreasing pressure, the temperature interval between the first appearance of liquidus chromite and orthopyroxene increases by up to 40 °C at 1 kbar. Note also that the temperature difference between the appearance of liquidus chromite/orthopyroxene and plagioclase reduces in response to the progressive expansion of the plagioclase stability volume as the pressure decreases (Fig. 4). Thus, the results of this modelling entirely corroborate the key inference of our graphical phase equilibria analysis: that melt compositions located on the chromite topological trough at high pressure become purely saturated in chromite at low pressure (Fig. 3, path C–D).

Table 1 Composition of basaltic liquid used for alphaMELTS modelling at a pressure range from 1 to 10 kbar
Fig. 4

Thermodynamic modelling indicating the mechanism via which basaltic melts become saturated in chromite alone by pressure reduction. The basaltic liquid that is saturated in orthopyroxene and chromite at high pressures (along the interval from 10 to 6 kbar) becomes saturated in chromite alone, which is the first liquidus phase, followed by orthopyroxene, at low pressures (P < 6kbar). This case is analogous to path C–D in Fig. 3b, c. Note that adiabatic ascent of the crystal-free melts from a deep-seated storage region located at pressure of ~10 kbar towards the Earth’s surface may result at 1–3 kbar in up to 80–95 °C of magma superheating relative to their liquidus temperature. Crystallisation of the basaltic liquid (Table 1) was modelled at FMQ oxygen buffer and a low water content (0.45 wt.%) using alphaMELTS software, version 1.4.118, 19. The results are summarised in the electronic appendix (Supplementary Data 1 and 2)

Experimental data

We have further tested the prediction of graphical and thermodynamic approaches by re-examining the available experimental data on chromite stability in basaltic systems. There are not yet fully appreciated data that provide direct support for our theoretical modelling. In particular, data for Cr-solubility in basaltic melts at chromite saturation clearly indicate that the chromite stability volume expands as pressure decreases24,25. These data should not be confused with experiments indicating that the spinel stability volume, in contrast, shrinks with decreasing pressure at the expense of the silicate minerals17. These experiments are done in simple Cr-free and Fe-free systems and are therefore not directly applicable for the behaviour of chromite stability volume in multicomponent basaltic liquids. The resultant change in the position of the chromite topological trough (Fig. 3c), would contribute to moving some basaltic melts, initially saturated in olivine/orthopyroxene and chromite, directly into the chromite stability volume in response to a decrease in lithostatic pressure. Even more importantly, several experimental studies directly indicate that some natural basaltic magmas, at a wide range of water contents and oxygen fugacities, have chromite as the primary liquidus phase at low pressures26,27,28. As an illustration, anhydrous phase relations for a primitive arc basalt (MgO = 15.13 wt%; Cr2O3 = 0.10 wt%)28 indicate that at high pressures (6–10 kbar) it is saturated in both olivine and chromite, whereas at low pressures (0–6 kbar) chromite becomes the only liquidus phase (Fig. 5b). This pure chromite saturation apparently occurs because the initial melt composition is, at high pressures, located on the olivine-chromite liquidus surface of the chromite topological trough (Figs. 2 and 3).

Fig. 5

A physical model for the generation of basaltic melts saturated in chromite alone by a reduction in lithostatic pressure. a Mantle-derived basaltic melts ascending from lower crustal storage regions, or a mantle source, inevitably experience a reduction in lithostatic pressure. This results in shifting of the chromite topological trough and, as a result, basaltic melts located alongside the chromite topological trough, at high pressure regions will become saturated in chromite alone during ascent to shallow-level chambers. Fractional crystallisation of a large volume of these chromite-saturated melts, in an open system where magma can also flow out of the chamber, will produce monomineralic layers of massive chromitites in mafic-ultramafic intrusions. b Phase relations for a primitive basalt (MgO = 15.13 wt.%; Cr2O3 = 0.10 wt.%) in PT space illustrating the model that basaltic melts located alongside the chromite topological trough first become slightly superheated during their ascent and then saturated in chromite alone after stalling and cooling in shallow-level chambers. Therefore, allowing for the development of massive chromitites in shallow-level chambers. This case is analogous to path C–D in Fig. 3b, c and Fig. 4c, in which multiply-saturated liquids become saturated in chromite alone with pressure reduction. The phase diagram is simplified from Fig. 10 in ref. 28 and is only used to graphically illustrate the principle lying at the heart of our model


The above three lines of evidence—graphical phase equilibria, thermodynamic modelling and experimental data—collectively indicate that mantle-derived basaltic melts lying close to, or directly on, the chromite topological trough, may become saturated in chromite alone in response to a decrease in lithostatic pressure. This finding provides a basis for our novel proposal for the origin of massive chromitites in layered intrusions (Fig. 5). We suggest that such basaltic melts, derived either directly from the mantle or deep-seated crustal reservoirs, become first superheated during their upward ascent. For instance, adiabatic ascent of melts from a deep-seated storage region at ~10 kbar towards a shallow-level intrusion at ~1–3 kbar may result in about 80–95 °C of magma superheating (Fig. 4). The adiabatic path may be favoured by rapid ascent of large volumes of magma from depth so that its cooling would be negligible. In reality, some cooling of magma will inevitably occur in response to resorption of any suspended phenocrysts inherited from the deeper magma reservoir, assimilation of crustal wall rocks, and conductive heat loss to cold crustal rocks. The path shown in Fig. 5b takes into account these possible cooling mechanisms during ascent so that upon arrival into a shallow-level chamber the magma will only be superheated by ~10 °C (Fig. 5b). Simple calculations illustrate that magmas with such a degree of superheating are capable of thermochemically eroding a substantial amount of pre-existing footwall cumulates10,11,12,29. This may explain why most, if not all, of the Bushveld’s massive chromitites regionally cut down through several metres of the underlying cumulates and overly regionally extensive igneous unconformities12.

After erosion of footwall rocks with resultant cooling, the shallowly emplaced magma starts to crystallise chromite alone (Fig. 5b) forming a layer of massive chromitite, with associated platinum-group elements, on the chamber floor (Fig. 5a). We suggest that periodic replenishment of shallow-level crustal chambers by such melts is most likely responsible for the development of massive chromitites in mafic-ultramafic intrusions. The production of thick layers of massive chromitite requires a great enough volume of chromite-saturated magma. This is not an issue as most intrusions that host chromitites acted as open systems, with large volumes of magma (equivalent to a layer several km thick) flowing in and out of the system7,8. In particular, there is evidence for this open system behaviour in the Bushveld Complex, with vast quantities of inflowing magmas being subsequently expelled from the chamber and now locally preserved as basaltic lavas of the Rooiberg Group22,30. An advantage of our proposal is that it does not require the complex internal processes that are commonly invoked for chromite-saturation within upper crustal chambers2,3,4,5,6,7. Scrutiny of the concepts involving these processes during the last few decades has revealed that none can adequately explain characteristic features of massive chromitites8,20,31,32,33. Similarly, our proposal makes unnecessary a currently popular appeal for the formation of massive chromitites from crystal-rich slurries, through mechanical segregation of chromite from modally prevailing olivine and orthopyroxene31,32,33, which is associated with several serious physical and compositional problems6,12,20.

The major strength of our novel proposal is in its inherent simplicity. All ascending mantle-derived melts on our planet are inevitably subjected to a reduction in lithostatic pressure. Therefore, it is quite natural that some of them, compositionally located alongside the chromite topological trough, may reach chromite only saturation. This scenario appears to be conceptually the simplest and physically most plausible explanation for a generation of chromite-saturated melts parental to massive chromitites in layered intrusions. This new mechanism necessitates profound reassessment of existing petrogenetic models for chromitite deposits. We also infer that this mechanism can be extrapolated to explain the podiform chromitites that are commonly observed in ophiolites as well as non-ophiolitic peridotite complexes34,35,36. In addition, we predict that the origin of other magmatic deposits can ultimately be resolved by examining the consequences of lithostatic pressure reduction on liquidus phase equilibria. This appears to be a quite promising, yet currently poorly explored, line of research. This study thus potentially provides a long-missing piece of the puzzle for our understanding of the Earth’s magmatic activity that led to the generation of ore-forming melts. The reduction in lithostatic pressure during the transcrustal transfer of mantle-derived melts may represent an outstanding creator of other types of ore-forming melts (e.g. magnetite-only-saturated) thus developing strategic planetary resources, without which modern human society cannot develop in a sustainable manner37.


MELTS programme

Thermodynamic calculations were carried out using alphaMELTS software, version 1.4.118,19. The implementation in computing software of the thermodynamic properties of Cr-bearing phases, involving partitioning of chromium between melt, ortho- and clinopyroxene, in the presence or absence of spinel and/or garnet, has certain limitations. However, our approach targets close-to-liquidus phase relationships, where clinopyroxene, the main silicate host of chromium, is not stable. Hence, the calculations involving equilibrium between liquid-chromite-orthopyroxene-plagioclase are only associated with small errors, due to the fractions of percent of Cr2O3 hosted in orthopyroxene. On the basis of fundamental theories of solid solutions: the effect of Cr2O3 on the density of orthopyroxene and spinel/chromite and the Cr–Al substitutions in orthopyroxene and chromite, one can predict that chromium partitioning into orthopyroxene in the absence of clinopyroxene and in the presence of spinel/chromite and liquid, will have several effects. Among them are an insignificant lowering of the temperature stability field of Cr-bearing orthopyroxene relative to liquid and chromite at low pressure and a negligible increase of the stability field of Cr-bearing orthopyroxene relative to chromite at high pressures. These effects support the concepts of our approach, where a basaltic magma has liquidus (Cr-bearing) orthopyroxene at high pressures, but (higher aluminium) chromite at lower pressures. These effects therefore indicate that the assumption that the influence of Cr2O3 in orthopyroxene is negligible is valid.

Parental melt and its crystallisation sequence

The MELTS algorithm38 was used to explore the relative crystallisation sequence of the B2 melt that is commonly considered as parental for the chromitite-bearing CZ of the Bushveld Complex20,21. We have tested this melt by running the isobaric calculations at the low pressures proposed for the emplacement of the complex (1–3 kbar)39. The results showed that plagioclase is the first mineral to crystallise after chromite, followed by clinopyroxene (pigeonite), and then olivine close to the solidus temperature. No orthopyroxene was produced at low pressures. The outcome is thus in striking contradiction with the phase relationships in the Upper CZ (UCZ) which has orthopyroxene as the first liquidus phase. Therefore, the conventional B2 melt was abandoned in our thermodynamic calculations. Instead, we have modified its major element composition to reproduce the mineral assemblage observed in the UCZ. In particular, the SiO2 was increased to promote the crystallisation of orthopyroxene instead of olivine. The Al2O3 and CaO were adjusted to reproduce the plagioclase in the sequence of crystallisation and its composition in the Bushveld UCZ. The Cr2O3 was increased to explore the temperature of chromite crystallisation and reproduce its composition observed in massive chromitites of the Bushveld CZ. FeO content was decreased to allow orthopyroxene crystallisation before plagioclase and clinopyroxene, to assure clinopyroxene crystallisation after plagioclase, and to increase MgO/FeO ratios in orthopyroxene and chromite, to match their compositions with those in the Bushveld CZ. In this process, we have identified several potential basaltic liquids that produce crystallisation sequences and mineral composition that are roughly comparable with those observed in the Bushveld CZ. One of these liquids is presented in Table 1. Calculations for this basaltic composition were run over a pressure range from 10 to 1 kbar at FMQ oxygen buffer and a low water content (0.45 wt.%) (Supplementary Data 1 and 2). The temperatures of the first appearance of minerals for every run were compiled and plotted in a pressure-temperature diagram.

Data availability

The authors declare that all relevant data are available within the article and its supplementary information files.


  1. 1.

    Dill, H. G. The “chessboard” classification scheme of mineral deposits: mineralogy and geology from aluminium to zirconium. Earth Sci. Rev. 100, 1–420 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ulmer, G. C. Experimental investigations of chromite spinels. Econ. Geol. Monogr. 4, 114–131 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Irvine, T. N. Origin of chromitite layers in the Muskox intrusion and other stratiform intrusions: a new interpretation. Geology 5, 273–277 (1977).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lipin, B. R. Pressure increases, the formation of chromite seams, and the development of the ultramafic series in the Stillwater complex, Montana. J. Petrol. 34, 955–976 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Campbell, I. H. & Murck, B. W. Petrology of the G and H chromitite zones in the Mountain View area of the Stillwater complex, Montana. J. Petrol. 34, 291–316 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Junge, M., Oberthür, T. & Melcher, F. Cryptic variation of chromite chemistry, platinum group element and platinum group mineral distribution in the UG-2 chromitite: an example from the Karee Mine, Western Bushveld Complex, South Africa. Econ. Geol. 109, 795–810 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Marques, J. C. & Ferreira Filho, C. F. The chromite deposits of the Ipueira-Medrado Sill, Bahia, Brazil’. Econ. Geol. 98, 87–108 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Naldrett, A. J., Kinnaird, J., Wilson, A., Yudovskaya, M. & Chunnett, G. The origin of chromitites and related PGE mineralization in the Bushveld Complex: new mineralogical and petrological constraints. Miner. Depos. 47, 209–232 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Latypov, R. M., Chistyakova, S., Yu, Page, A. & Hornsey, R. Field evidence for the in situ crystallization of the Merensky Reef. J. Petrol. 56, 2341–2372 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pebane, M. & Latypov, R. The significance of magmatic erosion for bifurcation of UG1 chromitite layers in the Bushveld Complex. Ore Geol. Rev. 90, 65–93 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mukherjee, R., Latypov, R. & Balakrishnan, A. An intrusive origin of some UG-1 chromitite layers in the Bushveld Igneous Complex, South Africa: insights from field relationships. Ore Geol. Rev. 90, 94–109 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Latypov, R. M., Chistyakova, S., Yu. & Mukherjee, R. A. Novel hypothesis for origin of massive chromitites in the Bushveld Igneous Complex. J. Petrol. (2017).

  13. 13.

    Irvine, T. N. & Sharpe, M. R. in Metallogeny of Basic and Ultrabasic Rocks (eds. M. J., Gallagher, R. A., Ixer, C. R., Neary. & H. M., Pritchard) 183–198 (Instit. Mining Metallurgy, London, 1986).

  14. 14.

    Cashman, K. V., Sparks, R. S. J. & Blundy, J. D. Vertically extensive and unstable magmatic systems: a unified view of igneous processes. Science 355, eaag3055 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Upton, B. G. J. et al. Picritic magmas and the Rum ultramafic complex, Scotland. Geol. Mag. 139, 437–452 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chistyakova, S. Yu, Latypov, R. M. & Zaccarini, F. Chromitite dykes in the Monchegorsk layered intrusion, Russia: in situ crystallization from chromite-saturated magma flowing in conduits. J. Petrol. 56, 2395–2424 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sen, G. & Presnall, D. C. Liquidus phase relationships on the join anorthite-forsterite-quartz at 10 kbar with applications to basalt genesis. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 85, 404–408 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Smith, P. M. & Asimow, P. D. Adiabat_1ph: a new public front-end to the MELTS, pMELTS, and pHMELTS models. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 6, Q02004 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Antoshechkina, P. M., & Asimow, P. D. Alpha MELTS 3.0 and the MAGMA website: educational and research tools for studying the petrology and geochemistry of plate margins. In Abstract ED41B-0644 Presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 Dec. (2010).

  20. 20.

    Cawthorn, R. G. in Layered Intrusions (eds. Charlier B., Namur, O., Latypov R. & Tegner, C.) 517–587 (Springer, New York, NY, 2015).

  21. 21.

    Barnes, S.-J., Maier, W. D. & Curl, E. Composition of the marginal rocks and sills of the Rustenburg layered suite, Bushveld Complex, South Africa: implications for the formation of the PGE deposits. Econ. Geol. 105, 1491–1511 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Maier, W. D., Arndt, N. T. & Curl, E. A. Progressive crustal contamination of the Bushveld Complex: evidence from Nd isotopic analyses of the cumulate rocks. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 140, 316–327 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Eales, H. V. & Costin, G. Crustally contaminated komatiite: primary source of the chromitites and marginal, lower, and critical zone magmas in a staging chamber beneath the Bushveld Complex. Econ. Geol. 107, 645–665 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Roeder, P. L. & Reynolds, I. Crystallization of chromite and chromium solubility in basaltic melts. J. Petrol. 32, 909–934 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ballhaus, C. Origin of podiform chromite deposits by magma mingling. Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett. 156, 185–193 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hill, R. & Roeder, P. The crystallization of spinel from basaltic liquid as a function of oxygen fugacity. J. Geol. 82, 709–729 (1974).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Feig., S., Koepke, J. & Snow, J. Effect of oxygen fugacity and water on phase equilibria of a hydrous tholeiitic basalt. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 160, 551–568 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Stamper, C. C. et al. Oxidised phase relations of a primitive basalt from Grenada, Lesser Antilles. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 167, 954 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Latypov, R. M., Chistyakova, S., Yu, Barnes, S. J. & Hunt, E. J. Origin of platinum deposits in layered intrusions by in situ crystallization: evidence from undercutting Merensky Reef of the Bushveld Complex. J. Petrol. 58, 715–761 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hatton, C. J. & Schweitzer, J. K. Evidence for synchronous extrusive and intrusive Bushveld magmatism. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 21, 579–594 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mondal, S. K. & Mathez, E. A. Origin of the UG2 chromitite layer, Bushveld Complex. J. Petrol. 48, 495–510 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Maier, W. D., Barnes, S.-J. & Groves, D. I. The Bushveld Complex, South Africa: formation of platinum–palladium, chrome- and vanadium-rich layers via hydrodynamic sorting of a mobilized cumulate slurry in a large, relatively slowly cooling, subsiding magma chamber. Miner. Depos. 48, 1–56 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mungall, J. E., Kamo, S. L. & McQuade, S. U–Pb geochronology documents out-of-sequence emplacement of ultramafic layers in the Bushveld Igneous Complex of South Africa. Nat. Commun. 7, 13385 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    González-Jiménez, J.-M. et al. Chromitites in ophiolites: how, where, when, why? Part II. A review and new ideas on the crystallization of chromitites. Lithos. 189, 140–158 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Arai, S. & Miura, M. Podiform chromitites do form beneath mid-ocean ridges. Lithos 232, 143–149 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hunt, E., O’Driscoll, B. & Daly, J. S. Parental magma composition of the syntectonic Dawros Peridotite chromitites, NW Connemara, Ireland. Geol. Mag. 149, 590–605 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Saleem, H. A. et al. Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature 543, 367–372 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ghiorso, M. S. & Sack, R. O. Chemical mass transfer in magmatic processes IV. A revised and internally consistent thermodynamic model for the interpolation and extrapolation of liquid-solid equilibria in magmatic systems at elevated temperatures and pressures. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 119, 197–212 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Waters, D. J. & Lovegrove, D. P. Assessing the extent of disequilibrium and overstepping of prograde metamorphic reactions in metapelites from the Bushveld Complex aureole, South Africa. J. Metamorph. Geol. 20, 135–149 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to B. Robins, B. O’Driscoll, O. Namur, J. Kramers, L. Ashwal, W. Maier, E. Mathez, S. Barnes, A. Morse, J. Day, C. Ballhaus, N. Arndt, I. Veksler, A. Boudreau, P. Horvath, M. Yudovskaya and I. Campbell for fruitful discussions on many aspects of this study as well as for critical comments and useful suggestions on the numerous earlier versions of this manuscript. The research was supported by several research grants to R.L., S.C., E.H. and R.M. from the National Research Foundation of South Africa.

Author information




R.L, S.C. and T.N. conceptualised the original idea. R.L. and S.C. constructed phase diagrams and wrote the original draft paper. G.C. performed thermodynamic calculations. E.H. and R.M. participated in data processing and interpretation as well as in improving clarity of a table and figures. All co-authors discussed the results and problems and contributed to producing a final draft for peer reviews and in revising the manuscript after peer and official reviews.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rais Latypov.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latypov, R., Costin, G., Chistyakova, S. et al. Platinum-bearing chromite layers are caused by pressure reduction during magma ascent. Nat Commun 9, 462 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing