The molecules of life were created by a continuous physicochemical process on an early Earth. In this hadean environment, chemical transformations were driven by fluctuations of the naturally given physical parameters established for example by wet–dry cycles. These conditions might have allowed for the formation of (self)-replicating RNA as the fundamental biopolymer during chemical evolution. The question of how a complex multistep chemical synthesis of RNA building blocks was possible in such an environment remains unanswered. Here we report that geothermal fields could provide the right setup for establishing wet–dry cycles that allow for the synthesis of RNA nucleosides by continuous synthesis. Our model provides both the canonical and many ubiquitous non-canonical purine nucleosides in parallel by simple changes of physical parameters such as temperature, pH and concentration. The data show that modified nucleosides were potentially formed as competitor molecules. They could in this sense be considered as molecular fossils.
The molecules of life originated around 4 billion years ago under conditions governed by the composition of the Earth’s crust and atmosphere at that time1, 2. Molecules such as nucleic acids and amino acids must have formed by a continuous physicochemical process, in which greater structural complexity was generated based on fluctuations of the naturally given physical parameters3. Geothermal fields, for example, could have established such fluctuations by wet–dry cycles that may have driven chemical transformations, which ultimately allowed the emergence of life4,5,6,7,8. The appearance of (self)-replicating RNA was certainly of central importance for the transition from an abiotic world to biology9,10,11. We need to consider, however, that an early genetic polymer might have been structurally different from contemporary RNA. This involves differences regarding the sugar configuration (e.g., pyranosyl RNA) or the presence of other nucleobases12, 13. Selection pressure led in this scenario to the chemical evolution of RNA. Contemporary RNA molecules contain four canonical nucleosides (A, G, C, U), which establish the sequence information. In addition, >120 non-canonical nucleosides are present, which govern a diverse set of properties such as correct folding, e.g., to enable catalysis14. In fact, the genetic system of all known life is dependent on modified nucleosides. Many of these non-canonical nucleosides are found today in all three domains of life, which indicates that they were present early on during the development of life. For the ubiquitous non-canonical nucleosides we may assume that they were already formed as competitors in parallel with the canonical ones on the early Earth15. So far, however, a geochemical scenario that would allow for the parallel formation of canonical and non-canonical RNA building blocks by a continuous process is not known. All reported multistep chemical models so far rely on tightly controlled laboratory conditions and the isolation and purification of central reaction intermediates by sophisticated methods1, 16,17,18,19.
Herein, we report a robust synthetic pathway, which is purely based on fluctuations of physicochemical parameters such as pH, concentration, and temperature, driven by wet–dry cycles. These fluctuations enable the direct enrichment or purification of all reaction intermediates that are directly used for the next synthetic steps. As such, a continuous synthesis is established. Our results show that RNA building blocks can indeed be formed in a prebiotically plausible geochemical environment without sophisticated isolation and purification procedures. The chemical scenario presented here supports the hypothesis that life may have originated in a hydrothermal milieu on land rather than in a deep sea environment. The key assembly step in our pathway is the formation of variously substituted 5-nitroso-pyrimidines (nitrosoPys) that can be converted into formamidopyrimidines (FaPys) in the presence of formic acid and elementary metals (Ni or Fe). When combined with ribose, the FaPy compounds react to give a set of purine nucleosides. This chemical pathway delivers not only the canonical purine nucleosides but concomitantly many of the ubiquitously present non-canonical relatives, suggesting their origin as prebiotic competitor nucleosides (A, ms2A, m2A, DA, G, m2G, m22G, m1G). Since chemical evolution depended on those molecules that were available on early Earth, these non-canonical nucleosides may be considered to be molecular fossils, which maintained their essential life-supporting character until the present day.
Selective crystallization of an organic salt
The chemical scenario that leads to a continuous synthesis of RNA building blocks by just fluctuations of physical parameters is shown in Figs. 1 and 2a. The scenario starts with an aqueous solution of malononitrile 1 and different amidinium salts 2a-d (HCl or H2SO4 salts, 400 mM), both recognized prebiotic compounds18. In addition, sodium nitrite and acetic acid are present to establish a slightly acidic pH of around 4. Under these conditions the amidine molecules (2a-d) are protonated, which leads to their chemical deactivation. This allows selective nitrosation of malononitrile 1 to give (hydroxyimino)malononitrile 3 in situ. Slow evaporation of water under ambient conditions, followed by gentle cooling to 8–10 °C resulted in crystallization of a salt from the ca. 1 M amidinium solution. This crystallization is very robust and resembles naturally occurring concentration processes. The resultant crystals had excellent quality for X-ray analysis, which showed that the salts are formed from the amidinium cations 2a-d and the (hydroxyimino)malononitrile anion of 3 (Fig. 2b). Interesting is the distance between the negatively charged oxygen in 3 and the positively charged H-bond donor centre of the amidininium units 2a-d. We determined distances between 1.85–1.95 Å, which is long for a salt bridge but right in the regime for a typical hydrogen bond. This is important because it is supposedly the reason for the comparably low melting temperatures of the salts, which we determined between 110 and 160 °C. The robustness and ease of crystallization establishes a first physical enrichment step that finishes the initial wet–dry phase with the deposition of these salt materials (Fig. 2b).
When the obtained salts containing 2a-d and 3 are subsequently heated to their respective melting temperatures, transformation into the corresponding nitroso-pyrimidines (4a-d, Fig. 3a) occurs. The required temperatures between 110 and 160 °C could have been readily accessible under early Earth conditions, due to, for example, volcanic activity in geothermal fields or sunlight shining on dark surfaces. In order to investigate whether the nitroso-compounds 4a-d would form in parallel despite their varying structures and different melting points, the different salts were combined in a reaction flask and a temperature gradient (1 °C/5 min, from 100–160 °C) was applied to simulate soil that would slowly heat up. Subsequent 1H-NMR analysis indicated successful formation of the anticipated nitroso-pyrimidines 4a-d (Supplementary Fig. 1).
The resultant nitroso-pyrimidines are stable compounds with melting points typically >250 °C without decomposition. In addition we noted that the nitroso-pyrimidines are rather insoluble in water, which offers the possibility for a second physical enrichment step. Addition of water to the reaction mixture dissolves unreacted starting materials, leaving the nitroso-pyrimidines in basically NMR-pure form behind (Supplementary Fig. 2). In this model, one wet–dry cycle and two physical enrichment steps with a final rain shower or flooding would be sufficient to deposit a mixture of stable nitroso-pyrimidines (4a-d) in excellent purities and good chemical yields between 60 and 85% (Fig. 3a).
Diversification by hydrolysis and aminolysis
Depending on the composition and pH of the aqueous environment, which may or may not contain different amines, the nitroso-pyrimidines could undergo further hydrolysis and aminolysis reactions (Fig. 3a). Because these reactions are very slow under neutral conditions, we used dilute HCl to accelerate the processes for investigation. Importantly, we noted a high regioselectivity. Upon treatment overnight at room temperature with 0.5 M HCl, compounds 4a and 4c for example are hydrolyzed to afford the oxo-nitroso-pyrimidines 4f and 4i in near quantitative yields. Hydrolysis of 4b to product 4e was comparitively slower, and under our accelerated conditions a mixture of 4b and 4e was obtained. This inefficient conversion would be advantageous in a prebiotic context given that from 4b the canonical nucleoside adenosine (A) and its 2-thiomethyl derivative (ms2A) are derived later, whereas 4e gives rise to guanosine derivatives (G, m2G, m22G, Fig. 3a). This allows for the simultaneous formation of canonical and non-canonical bases from the same precursor. In contrast to the 2-amino (4a,c) or 2-methyl (4d) substituted nitroso-pyrimidines, we noted that the 2-thiomethyl functionality in 4b and 4e was prone to undergo selective nucleophilic substitution. Reaction of 4e with different amines leads to efficient formation of the nitroso-pyrimidines 4g-i with the concomitant release of methanethiol. Due to its insolubility under basic conditions, nucleophilic substitutions of 4b are very inefficient. To confirm this, we partially hydrolyzed 4b to 4e in the presence of methylamine (300 mM) and dimethylamine (100 mM). The pH was carefully adjusted with Na2CO3 to about pH 10. Compound 4b precipitated, while 4e stayed in solution, consequently protecting 4b from further reactions. It is in this context interesting that nucleosides that would form via aminolysis of 4b have not yet been found in nature. In contrast, 4e reacts efficiently and after 3–4 days at room temperature 4e is almost completely converted into 4g and 4h, which are direct precursors to the ubiquitous non-canonical RNA bases m2G and m22G (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 3).
Thus, a few simple chemoselective and regioselective hydrolysis and aminolysis reactions affords a diverse mixture of differently substituted nitroso-pyrimidines (4b-d, f-i), all of which possess the right substitution pattern for the synthesis of naturally occuring canonical and non-canonical RNA nucleosides. Because all the formed nitroso-pyrimidines are poorly soluble in water at neutral pH, neutralizing the solutions leads to their efficient precipitation, providing a naturally occurring purification step (Fig. 3b). Importantly, all nitroso-pyrimidines that later give adenosine-derived nucleosides (4b-d) are soluble in water under acidic conditions, while the nitroso-compounds that are converted into guanosine-derived nucleosides (4g-i, except for 4f) are soluble under basic pH conditions. These properties allow for potentially divergent chemical pathways leading to A-derived and G-derived nucleosides (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 4).
Formamidopyrimidine formation as nucleobase precursor
The next wet–dry cycles allow for the formation and isolation of formamidopyrimidines (FaPys) 5a-h, from nitroso-pyrimidines 4 that are after their precipitation exposed to acidic conditions like dilute formic acid in the presence of elementary Fe or Ni, which are components of the Earth’s crust. This leads to reduction of the nitroso-pyrimidines 4 to aminopyrimidines as non-isolated reaction intermediates (Fig. 3a, in square brackets), which are immediately formylated to give the water soluble formamidopyrimidines (FaPys) 5a-h in a one-pot reaction. During the wet phase, Ni0 and Fe0 are converted into the biologically relevant Ni2+/Fe2+ ions, while formic acid decomposes into CO2 and H2 (Fig. 3c). In the reaction formic acid has a dual function. It provides the H-atoms needed for the reduction and it subsequently reacts with the formed aminopyrimidines to give FaPy compounds that were already shown to be prebiotically valid precursors to purine nucleosides18. The Ni/Fe/formic acid environment converts quantitatively all nitroso-compounds 4b-d,f-i into the corresponding FaPy compounds 5a-h (Fig. 3a). The water soluble FaPy compounds (under dilute basic conditions) can now be separated from unreacted Ni0/Fe0 and from the formed Ni2+/Fe2+ byproducts. Under slightly basic conditions (pH ≈ 9–10) the latter compounds precipitate as insoluble carbonate or hydroxide salts. The FaPys 5a-h are thus washed away, while the transition metal compounds sediment out. Final evaporation of water concentrates the reaction mixture, leading to the crystallization of the FaPy molecules. This third physical enrichment step, involving a wet–dry cycle, leads to the NMR-clean formation of FaPy-derivatives 5a-h (Fig. 3c).
The 2-(methylthio)-5-nitrosopyrimidine-4,6-diamine (4b) gives after treatment with formic acid and elementary Ni two different FaPy products depending on the reaction conditions. One of the products (5b) contains a thiomethyl group, while the other (5c) is desulfurated. The desulfurization reaction is simply controlled by time and can be promoted when H2 is bubbled through the solution prior to reaction. Compound 5c is always generated in a stepwise reaction cascade via compound 5b which was confirmed by reacting 4b for 2 h and isolating the only product formed (5b, Fig. 3c). The isolated product was immediately subjected to the same conditions, which provided 5c after 7 days in pure form. This pathway via nitroso-pyrimidines thus affords 5c, the precursor for the canonical base A under plausible prebiotic conditions20. These conditions also lead to the parallel formation of the precursor to the ubiquitous 2-thiomethyl modification (ms2A), which is today found in all three domains of life.
Formation of canonical and non-canonical nucleosides
All of the prepared FaPy compounds undergo rapid and regioselective condensations with ribose when they are present in the same dry-state environment (Fig. 4). We do not assume that ribose was formed at the same location together with the FaPy compounds since the required carbohydrate chemistry may be incompatible. Several models are available, however, that show ribose formation in different physical environments21,22,23,24. Even though ribose and FaPys might have formed separately, the water solubility of the FaPys and of ribose allows them to be washed into the same environment by rain or flooding. Evaporation of water in the last wet–dry cycle would enable a condensation reaction under dry-state conditions. Indeed, the physically enriched FaPy compounds (5a-h) engage in a rapid reaction with ribose to give the corresponding FaPy-ribosides. Upon dissolution in water and subsequent heating under basic conditions, all four expected purine α/β-ribofuranosides (α/β−f) and α/β-pyranosides (α/β−p) are obtained (6a-h, Fig. 4a), completing the last wet–dry cycle. The LC-MS traces of the reactions using both UV- and MS-detection are shown in Fig. 4b. To ensure correct structural assignment we chemically synthesized some of the expected products and performed co-injection studies (Supplementary Methods). These experiments show that the major isomers are the naturally occurring β-configured pyranosides and furanosides. Pyranosides are building blocks for pyranosyl-RNA, which was suggested to be a potential RNA predecessor12. Therefore, our scenario delivers the building blocks for this pre-RNA and for RNA. As such it provides the basis for the chemical transition from one genetic polymer to the other directed by selection pressure. Importantly, our continuous synthetic pathway provides next to the canonical bases A and G also the non-canonical β-furanosyl-nucleosides (β−f) m2G, m22G, m1G, ms2A and m2A (in red, Fig. 4b), arguing that the early RNA polymer was structurally already more complex regarding the nucleobases. The ribosylation of the FaPys leading to non-canonical nucleosides is equally efficient to the formation of A and G, with yields between 15 and 60%. Interestingly, we noted that for some A derivatives (m2A, DA and A) other regioisomers were found as well. These isomers were not formed when pure FaPy starting materials were used that were not derived from our continuous synthesis. We believe that these isomers might be the N3-connected nucleosides, previously proposed by Wächtershäuser for homo-purine RNA25. Despite the presence of these side products, we observe efficient N9-nucleoside formation with remarkable yields of up to 60% for the canonical and the non-canonical nucleosides. This work demonstrates that the non-canonical compounds could plausibly have formed as companion and potential competitor compounds in parallel to the canonical nucleosides.
Life on earth certainly did not start in a chemists’ laboratory, where the relevant compounds are assembled in a step-by-step process from pure starting materials under tightly controlled conditions. Even if the individual reaction steps are performed under plausibly prebiotic conditions, the controlled assembly over many steps with sophisticated isolation and purification procedures of reaction intermediates is an unlikely scenario for chemical synthesis under early Earth conditions. For the process of chemical evolution on the early Earth, we may rather envision a more continuous synthesis, in which small organic molecules, initially formed by volcanic action or lightning, reacted to give increasingly more complex structures (Fig. 1). Here, chemical transformations may have been driven by physical fluctuations, established for example by day-night, seasonal or wet–dry cycles. Such fluctuating parameters might include temperature, concentration, and pH, which have triggered selective precipitation and crystallization to purify and concentrate reaction intermediates (Fig. 2a).
Regarding the central nucleoside building blocks of life, we believe that the four canonical nucleosides were finally selected from a more diverse prebiotic nucleoside pool. These canonical bases today establish the sequence information. The synthesis of the canonical purine (A, G)18 and pyrimidine (U, C)16 RNA building blocks has been previously demonstrated in aqueous environments. It is questionable, however, if these multistep synthesis pathways are able to provide all four canonical bases at the same time, which fuels the development of new prebiotically plausible nucleoside formation reactions17, 26, 27. Recently, all four canonical nucleosides (A, G, U, C) were accessed in low yields via a one-pot procedure from pure formamide28. However, in order to establish a functional genetic system a number of non-canonical nucleosides is required as well that provide other functions related to folding and catalysis29,30,31,32,33,34. Since many of these non-canonical bases are present in all three domains of life, it is likely that they have been early on part of the abiotic chemical selection process15. We report here the discovery of a continuous synthesis pathway that enables the efficient production of canonical and non-canonical purine bases in parallel. Our data show that formation of the many nucleosides needed to establish a functional genetic system is in fact an unavoidable event if we assume the presence of simple starting materials such as formic acid, acetic acid, sodium nitrite, malononitrile (1), amidinium compounds (2a-d), as well as transition metals like Ni or Fe. These simple compounds react in several successive wet–dry phases, leading to physical enrichment (I, II, and III) of reaction intermediates to finally give RNA building blocks. Wet–dry cycles have already been shown to be a plausible geological scenario especially for polymerization reactions35, 36. Our reported chemical scenario shows now that such a geological setup can also result in a diverse set of purine nucleosides by continuous synthesis (6a-h, Fig. 4). These nucleosides can be converted into the phosphorylated nucleotides based on recent advances in prebiotic phosphorylation reactions37, 38. So far, however, we are not yet able to include this step into our continuous synthesis.
Importantly, all here-reported non-canonical bases are known to exist in the three domains of life. Many are postulated components of the early genetic system of the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), suggesting that they were indeed present already at the onset of biological evolution39, 40. Based on the continuous synthesis pathway reported here, we hypothesize that the canonical and at least these non-canonical nucleosides could have formed side by side, dating the formation of the first non-canonical nucleosides back to the origin of chemical evolution around 4 billion years ago. As such, they could have been part of the chemical evolution process that established the putative RNA world41. Our chemistry invokes that methylated and thiomethylated nucleosides could particularly have been integral components of the first instructional (pre)-RNA molecules, likely to stabilize folded structures in order to accelerate catalytic processes29,30,31,32,33,34. We therefore propose that these nucleosides could be vestiges and molecular fossils of an early Earth, as it was suggested for cofactors42.
1-methylguanidine (2a) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3)
1-methylguanidine (2a) hydrochloride salt (10.95 g, 100 mmol, 1 eq.) and malononitrile (1) (6.65 g, 100 mmol, 1 eq.) was dissolved in H2O (230 mL, containing 6 mL of AcOH) in a 500 mL beaker. A solution of NaNO2 (7.00 g, 101 mmol, 1.01 eq., in 20 mL of H2O) was slowly added at room temperature. After stirring at room temperature for 2 h the reaction mixture was kept at 45 °C in an oil bath for 3–4 days open to the air until the mixture was concentrated to about 100 mL. The reaction mixture was placed in a fridge overnight at 8–10 °C. The formed yellow crystals were filtered off to give the desired product (6.70 g, 40 mmol, 40%).
Mp.: 108 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 7.23 (br m, 5H), 2.72 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 157.85, 119.50, 113.31, 107.18, 28.23. IR (cm−1): 3405 (m), 3351 (br, m), 3197 (m), 2977 (br, m), 2229 (s), 2218 (s) 1675 (s), 1635 (s), 1465 (w) 1428 (m), 1344 (s), 1269 (s) 1226 (s), 1172 (w), 1098 (m), 915 (m), 765 (m).
Methylthioamidine (2b) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3)
S-Methylisothiourea (2b) hemisulfate salt (27.8 g, 200 mmol, 1 eq.) and malononitrile (1) (13.3 g, 200 mmol, 1 eq.) was dissolved in H2O (460 mL, containing 12 mL of AcOH) in a 600 mL beaker. A solution of NaNO2 (14.0 g, 202 mmol, 1.01 eq., in 40 mL of H2O) was slowly added at room temperature. After stirring at room temperature for 2 h the reaction mixture was kept at 45 °C in an oil bath for 3–4 days open to the air until the mixture was concentrated to about 200 mL. The reaction mixture was placed in a fridge overnight at 8–10 °C. The formed yellow crystals were filtered off to give the desired product (16.7 g, 90 mmol, 45%).
Mp.: 126 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.90 (s, 4H), 2.56 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 171.62, 119.46, 113.29, 107.17, 13.71. IR (cm−1): 3282(m), 3146 (br, m), 2742 (br, w), 2530 (w), 2222 (s), 2213 (s) 1698 (m), 1663 (s), 1643 (s) 1549 (m), 1450 (m), 1424 (s) 1375 (w), 1335 (s), 1269 (s), 1223 (s), 1180 (w), 1099 (m), 1076 (w), 982 (m), 970 (w), 960 (w), 897 (br, m), 801 (m), 736 (m).
Guanidine (2c) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3)
Guanidine (2c) hydrochloride salt (9.55 g, 100 mmol, 1 eq.) and malononitrile (1) (6.65 g, 100 mmol, 1 eq.) was dissolved in H2O (230 mL, containing 6 mL of AcOH) in a 500 mL beaker. A solution of NaNO2 (7.00 g, 101 mmol, 1.01 eq., in 20 mL of H2O) was slowly added at room temperature. After stirring at room temperature for 2 h the reaction mixture was kept at 45 °C in an oil bath for 3–4 days open to the air until the mixture was concentrated to about 100 mL. The reaction mixture was placed in a fridge overnight at 8–10 °C. The formed yellow crystals were filtered off to give the desired product (8.20 g, 53 mmol, 53%).
Mp.: 159 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 6.91 (s, 6H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 158.32, 119.52, 113.32, 107.18. IR (cm−1): 3473 (m), 3373 (m), 3172 (w), 3087 (w), 2815 (br, w), 2223 (s), 2217 (s), 1668 (m), 1641 (s), 1578 (w), 1552 (w), 1369 (w), 1343 (s), 1294 (w), 1264 (s), 1220 (s), 1140 (w), 975 (w), 792 (w), 757 (w).
Acetamidine (2d) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3)
Acetamidine (2d) hydrochloride salt (9.45 g, 100 mmol, 1 eq.) and malononitrile (1) (6.65 g, 100 mmol, 1 eq.) was dissolved in H2O (230 mL, containing 6 mL of AcOH) in a 500 mL beaker. A solution of NaNO2 (7.00 g, 101 mmol, 1.01 eq., in 20 mL of H2O) was slowly added at room temperature. After stirring at room temperature for 2 h the reaction mixture was kept at 45 °C in an oil bath for 3–4 days open to the air until the mixture was concentrated to about 100 mL. The reaction mixture was placed in a fridge overnight at 8–10 °C. The formed yellow crystals were filtered off to give the desired product (8.80 g, 60 mmol, 60%).
Mp.: 142 °C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 8.60 (s, 4H), 2.11 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 168.11, 119.50, 113.31, 107.18, 18.72. IR (cm−1): 3282 (m), 3140 (br, m), 2781 (m), 2395 (w), 2236 (s), 2217 (s) 1708 (s), 1661 (s), 1592 (br, w) 1513 (m), 1373 (s), 1351 (s) 1259 (s), 1200 (s), 1191 (s), 1160 (w), 1125 (m), 969 (w), 907 (w), 883 (w), 857 (w), 790 (s), 691 (s), 684 (s).
Synthesis of nitrosopyrimidine 4a-d from salts containing 2a-d and 3
The reaction time of the following procedures for the formation of 4a-d depend on the crystal size of the organic salts and the heating source. Usually conversions were done in a beaker open to the air in an oil bath to simulate hot soil. Large crystals sometimes already convert into nitroso-pyrimidines by a solid-state reaction without melting. Then much longer reaction times of up to 7 days are required because of unequally distributed temperature. Alternatively, the organic salt can be converted by heating in an oven where temperature is equally distributed within the sample.
1-methylguanidine (2a) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3) (5.00 g, 29.5 mmol, 1 eq.) was heated slowly to its melting temperature of 108 °C and kept overnight. The compound melts suddenly but becomes a dark red solid again after leaving it overnight. The quantitative reaction mixture can be directly used for the next step without purification.
For analytical reasons a small batch of 1-methylguanidine (2a) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3) (100 mg, 0.59 mmol, 1 eq.) was reacted as described above. The reaction mixture was suspended well in water (2–3 mL) and the dark red solid was filtered off to give 6-imino-1-methyl-5-nitroso-1,6-dihydropyrimidine-2,4-diamine (59 mg, 0.35 mmol, 59%).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 11.44 (s, 1H), 8.41 (s, 1H), 8.08 (br, 1H), 7.67 (br, 1H), 7.49 (s, 1H), 3.26 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 165.44, 157.64, 146.95, 137.22, 27.64. HRMS (ESI + ): calc. for [C5H9N6O]+ 169.0832, found: 169.0832 [M + H]+
Methylthioamidine (2b) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3) (5.00 g, 27 mmol, 1 eq.) was heated slowly to its melting temperature of 126 °C and kept overnight. Caution: if the product is heated too quickly above the melting temperature it decomposes with the release of MeSH! The compound melts suddenly but becomes a dark green solid again. The quantitative reaction mixture can be directly used for the next step without purification.
For analytical reasons a small batch of methylthioamidine (2b) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3) (100 mg, 0.54 mmol, 1 eq.) was reacted as described above. The reaction mixture was suspended in water (2–3 mL) and the dark green solid was filtered off to give 2-(methylthio)-5-nitrosopyrimidine-4,6-diamine (64 mg, 0.35 mmol, 64%).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.18 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 9.00 (s, 1H), 8.42 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 2.46 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 179.05, 164.73, 146.22, 139.43, 14.08. HRMS (ESI+): calc. for [C5H8N5OS]+ 186.0444, found: 186.0444 [M + H]+
Guanidine (2c) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3) (5.00 g, 32 mmol, 1 eq.) was heated slowly to its melting temperature of 159 °C and kept overnight. The compound melts suddenly but becomes a red/pinkish solid again after leaving it overnight. The quantitative reaction mixture can be directly used for the next step without purification.
For analytical reasons a small batch of guanidine (2c) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3) (100 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1 eq.) was reacted as described above. The reaction mixture was suspended in water (2–3 mL) and the solid was filtered off to give NMR clean 5-nitrosopyrimidine-2,4,6-triamine (85 mg, 0.55 mmol, 85%).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.26 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (s, 1H), 7.19 (s, 2H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 166.52, 165.32, 151.43, 138.04. HRMS (ESI+): calc. for [C4H7N6O]+ 155.0676, found: 155.0676 [M + H]+
Acetamidine (2d) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3) (5.00 g, 32.5 mmol, 1 eq.) was heated slowly to its melting temperature of 142 °C and kept overnight. The compound melts suddenly but becomes a red/pinkish solid again after leaving it overnight. The quantitative reaction mixture can be directly used for the next step without purification.
For analytical reasons a small batch of acetamidine (2d) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3) (100 mg, 0.65 mmol, 1 eq.) was reacted as described above. After suspension in H2O (2–3 mL) the solid is filtered off to give NMR clean 2-methyl-5-nitrosopyrimidine-4,6-diamine (71 mg, 0.46 mmol, 71%).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 10.04 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 8.97 (s, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (s, 1H), 2.20 (s, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 175.20, 166.38, 146.76, 139.94, 26.83. HRMS (ESI-): calc. for [C5H6N5O]− 152.0578, found: 152.0578 [M-H]−
All data generated or analyzed during this study are presented in this article and its Supplementary Information File, or are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. X-ray crystallographic data were also deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) under the following CCDC deposition numbers: 1574226 for 1-methylguanidine (2a) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3); 1574223 for methylthioamidine (2b) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3); 1574225 for guanidine (2c) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3); 1574224 for acetamidine (2d) salt of (hydroxyimino)malononitrile (3). These can be obtained free of charge from CCDC via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for financial support through the research funding schemes SFB749, SFB1032, SPP1784, GRK2062, and the DFG Normalverfahrensprogram CA275-11/1. We thank the European Union Horizon 2020 program for funding the ERC Advanced project EPiR (741912). Further we thank the excellence cluster CiPS-M. We thank Florian Steinmann for synthetic help, Dr Markus Müller for further discussions and Dr Peter Mayer for providing X-ray structures.
About this article
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.